Relative progress and event indicators

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9665529
  • Patent Number
    9,665,529
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, March 29, 2007
    17 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, May 30, 2017
    7 years ago
  • CPC
  • Field of Search
    • US
    • 715 772000
    • 715 856000
    • 715 859000
    • CPC
    • G06F15/0291
  • International Classifications
    • G06F15/02
    • Term Extension
      1406
Abstract
A user's progress through a digital work may be presented using a progress gauge. One or more content dividers may be presented dividing the progress gauge into segments. Each segment of the progress gauge may correspond to a section of the digital work, and may visually represent an amount of content in the corresponding section of the digital work, relative to other sections of the digital work. A collection of digital works available for access by a computing device may be displayed. A progress gauge may be presented in association with one or more of the digital works in the collection of available digital works.
Description
BACKGROUND

Electronic distribution of information has gained importance with the proliferation of personal computers and wide area networks such as the Internet. With the widespread use of the Internet, it has become possible to store and distribute large, coherent units of information, such as books, using electronic technologies. Books and other media in electronic format are commonly referred to as electronic books (“eBooks”) or digital works.


Typically, digital works are structured as virtual frames presented on a computing device, and a user may turn or change from one virtual frame or “page” of electronic content to another. The term “page” as used herein refers to a collection of content presented at one time on a display. Thus, “pages” as described herein are not fixed permanently, and may be redefined or repaginated based on variances in display conditions, such as screen size, font type or size, margins, line spacing, resolution, or the like. Due in part to the variable nature of such “pages,” users may find it difficult to gauge their progress through the digital work. This problem is compounded by the fact that digital works may be displayed and read on a variety of different computing devices (e.g., computer monitors, portable digital assistants (PDAs), pocket computers, specialized eBook reader devices, etc.), under a variety of different display conditions (e.g., screen size and resolution, font type and size, margins, line spacing, etc.).


Accordingly, there remains a need to improve a reader's ability to navigate within a digital work and to better identify his or her location within the content of the digital work.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The detailed description is set forth with reference to the accompanying figures. In the figures, the left-most digit(s) of a reference number identifies the figure in which the reference number first appears. The use of the same reference numbers in different figures indicates similar or identical items.



FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of an eBook reader device displaying a digital work along with one illustrative progress gauge, in the form of a progress bar, visually indicating a user's progress through the digital work.



FIG. 2A is a schematic diagram showing the progress gauge of FIG. 1 in more detail.



FIG. 2B is a detail view showing the portion of the progress gauge shown in region B of FIG. 1.



FIG. 2C is a schematic diagram showing another illustrative progress gauge in the form of a progress bar.



FIG. 2D is a schematic diagram showing yet another illustrative implementation having multiple progress bars.



FIG. 2E is a schematic diagram showing yet another illustrative progress gauge, in the form of a semicircular progress gauge.



FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of an eBook reader device displaying an illustrative collection of digital works available for access to a user of the eBook reader device, along with a progress bar showing a user's progress through each digital work in the collection.



FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram showing another illustrative collection of digital works available to a user of an eBook reader device, along with a semicircular progress gauge showing a user's progress through each digital work in the collection.



FIG. 5 is a block diagram showing various components of an illustrative eBook reader device.



FIG. 6 is a flowchart showing an illustrative method of presenting a digital work and a progress gauge.



FIG. 7 is a flowchart showing an illustrative method of presenting a collection of digital works along with progress gauges showing a user's progress through each digital work in the collection of digital works.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Overview


In some computing devices, a progress bar is used to visually show the user's location in the digital work. However, simply knowing a location in the digital work may be of limited value to a user, unless the user also knows how long the digital work is relative to some frame of reference. In addition, such progress bars typically do not provide any information about the structure or layout of the digital work. Thus, a user has no way of knowing, for example, how much of the digital work is the primary content and how much is front matter (e.g., title page, copyright page, table of contents, etc.) or back matter (e.g., appendices, indexes, glossary, etc.). Nor is the user able to see where chapters, acts, sections, or other parts of the digital work begin and end.


As mentioned above, users may find it difficult, using existing display technology, to gauge their progress through digital works. While some existing devices employ a progress bar to visually show the user's location in the digital work, this information has limited value unless the user also knows the length of the digital work relative to some frame of reference. In addition, users may desire additional information about the structure or layout of the digital work which is not apparent from the existing progress bars. This disclosure describes techniques for displaying a progress gauge indicating the user's progress through the digital work, along with additional information about the structure, content, and/or layout of the digital work. In one example, content dividers are used to divide the progress gauge into segments corresponding to sections of the digital work. Each segment of the progress gauge is sized to visually represent an amount of content in the corresponding section of the digital work, relative to other sections of the digital work.


Also described are techniques of displaying a collection of digital works available for access by a user on a device, and a progress gauge for one or more digital works in the collection of available digital works. The progress gauges enable the user to see the relative lengths of the digital works in the collection and/or the user's progress through the associated digital works.


In illustrative implementations described herein, progress gauges are described in the context of displaying electronic books (“eBook”) or digital works. The terms “eBook” and “digital work” are used synonymously and, as used herein, may include any type of content which can be stored and distributed in digital form. By way of illustration, without limitation, digital works and eBooks can include all forms of textual information such as books, magazines, newspapers, newsletters, periodicals, journals, reference materials, telephone books, textbooks, anthologies, proceedings of meetings, forms, directories, maps, manuals, guides, references, photographs, articles, reports, documents, etc., and all forms of audio and audiovisual works such as music, multimedia presentations, audio books, movies, etc.


Also, while the progress gauges are described in various implementations as being displayed on an eBook reader device, the concepts may be implemented in other electronic devices or electronic readers besides eBook reader devices including, for example, personal computers, portable computers (e.g., laptops or pocket PCs), personal digital assistants (PDAs), portable gaming devices, wireless phones, and the like. Similarly, while certain implementations are described in the context of presentation of textual media (e.g., reading rates, reading time, etc.), progress bars and other progress gauges are also applicable to consumption of other types of digital works, such as audio, video, multimedia, or other types of content. In addition, while progress gauges are described as visually representing a user's progress through a digital work, in some instances progress gauges may additionally or alternatively represent a user's progress through a digital work audibly or in a tactile manner.


In view of the above, this disclosure describes ways of representing a user's progress through a digital work. In one aspect, a user's progress through the digital work may be presented using a progress gauge. The progress gauge may be divided into segments using one or more content dividers. Each segment of the progress gauge may correspond to a section of the digital work, and may visually represent an amount of content in the corresponding section of the digital work, relative to other sections of the digital work. Accordingly, a user may at a glance assess his or her progress through the digital work.


In another aspect, a collection of digital works available for access by a user may be displayed. A progress bar may be presented in association with one or more of the digital works in the collection of available digital works. Each progress bar indicates a user's progress through the associated digital work. Thus, the user may readily assess his or her progress through the multiple digital works.


Illustrative Computing Device with Progress Gauge



FIG. 1 illustrates an illustrative implementation of an eBook reader device 100 having a display screen 102, on which are displayed a header pane 104, a reading pane 106, and a navigation pane 108. In other implementations, one or more of these panes may be combined, modified, or omitted as necessary or desired for a given application. The header pane 104 may be used to display a title, author, date, time, chapter, section, and/or any other pertinent data to a user. The reading pane 106 may be used to display content of an eBook or digital work for consumption by a user. The navigation pane 108 may include any of a variety of interfaces which allow a user to navigate within and among eBooks and other content stored in memory or system storage of the eBook reader device 100.


In the implementation shown in FIG. 1, the navigation pane 108 includes a progress gauge 110 configured to visually indicate the user's progress through the digital work. In addition to the user's progress through the digital work, the progress gauge 110 may convey a variety of additional information to a user. For example, the progress gauge 110 and/or navigation pane 108 may in various implementations provide information about the digital work itself (e.g., structure, content, layout of the digital work, etc.), the user's consumption of the digital work (e.g., consumption rate, consumption time, etc.), information associated with the digital work (e.g., bookmarks, annotations, size of underlying data file, etc.), or virtually any other information which might be of interest to the user. The progress gauge 110 and/or navigation pane 108 may also include a variety of controls to the user, such as navigation controls (e.g., page forward/back, manual or auto scroll, search, go to, etc.), formatting controls (e.g., change font size or type, zoom in or out on the progress gauge, etc.), or any other sort of controls which might be useful to the user.


Illustrative In-Work Progress Gauges



FIG. 2A illustrates a display screen 200 including an illustrative progress gauge 202 which may be generated for display on a computing device, such as the eBook reader device 100. The progress gauge 202 in this implementation comprises a linear progress bar showing a user's progress through a digital work, a page indicator 204 showing current page and total number of pages in the digital work, and a “Go To” field 206 usable to jump to a specific location within the digital work. Of course, in other implementations, such as those described below, a variety of additional or alternative information and controls may be included in or associated with the progress gauge 202.


In the illustrated implementation, content dividers 208 are used to divide the progress bar 202 into segments corresponding to sections of the digital work. In this example, segments of the progress bar 202 correspond to primary content of the digital work, front matter (e.g., title page, copyright page, table of contents, and any other matter occurring prior to the primary content of the digital work), and back matter (e.g., appendices, indexes, glossary, end notes, and any other matter following the primary content of the digital work). In addition, the primary content, front matter, and back matter may be further divided into multiple parts (e.g., chapters, acts, scenes, sections, appendices, or other divisions), and the progress bar may include segments corresponding to the parts. However, in other implementations, progress bar segments may correspond to other sections of a digital work, such as unfolioed pages, drawings, figures, and the like. In addition, the various sections of the digital work may be shown by different colors, different shades of the same color, shading, or other designation. For example, primary content may be shown in one color, front matter in another color, back matter in another color, and unfolioed pages in still another color.


In the example shown, the progress bar 202 is divided into eight segments corresponding to front matter, six chapters of the primary content, and back matter, respectively. In the illustrated implementation, the content dividers 208 are shown as tick marks positioned along the top of the progress bar 202. However, in other implementations, any other desired shape and/or size of visual element may be used as a content divider and they content dividers may be placed in any other suitable location relative to the progress bar.


In the illustrated implementation, the segments of the progress bar 202 are sized to visually represent the relative sizes of the sections of the digital work. That is, larger sections of the digital work are generally represented by larger segments of the progress bar. This allows a user to readily see how the digital work is laid out and how large each section is relative to other sections of the digital work. This principle may be applied strictly linearly as shown in FIG. 2A, such that the largest segment of the progress bar corresponds to the largest section of the digital work (in this case Chapter 4), the second largest segment corresponds to the second largest section of the digital work (in this case Chapter 5), on down to the smallest segment, which corresponds to the smallest segment of the digital work (in this case the Front Matter). In other words the segments are sized proportionally to the sizes of the corresponding sections of the digital work.


Alternatively, segmentation of the progress bar 202 may be applied more generally in a non-linear manner. In one general segmentation example, sections of the digital work are grouped into classes (e.g., small, medium, and large) based on their size. For example, sections of a digital work smaller than a certain size (e.g., 500 units) could be classified as small, medium size sections of digital work (e.g., 500-10,000 units) could be classified as medium, and sections of the digital work larger than a certain size (e.g., 10,000 units) could be classified as large. The progress bar could then be divided into small, medium, and/or large segments according to the size of the sections of the digital work. In that case, the progress bar would still provide a general picture of the relative size of the segments, but using only segments of three different sizes. Of course, any number and size of classes may be used, depending on the level of detail, granularity, and/or segment size desired. This general segmentation approach may be appropriate where a few sections are substantially larger than the other sections of the digital work. In that case, under strict segmentation, segments corresponding to the substantially larger sections of the digital work would dominate the progress bar and segments corresponding to the smaller sections of the digital work might be difficult to discern on the progress bar due to their small size.


Another alternative would be to apply a strict segmentation approach, subject to predetermined minimum and/or maximum segment sizes. Thus, the segment sizes would be determined according to the strict segmentation approach described above, except that sections of the digital work smaller than a certain size would be represented on the progress bar by a predetermined minimum segment size, and/or sections of the digital work larger than a certain size would be represented on the progress bar by a predetermined maximum segment size. In each of the segmentation approaches described herein, the size of the digital work may be measured in a variety of ways, such as, for example, based on the number of characters, words, horizontal bands of content, bytes, multiples of bytes, or any other suitable unit of measurement.


In addition, in some implementations, the overall size of the progress bar 202 may be based on the size of the digital work relative to other digital works. That is, larger digital works would have longer progress bars than shorter digital works. This principle can again be applied strictly or generally in roughly the same manner described above for sizing the segments of the progress bar.


The progress bar 202 shows the user's progress through the digital work as a total of the user's progress during a current or most recent consumption session 210 (shown in dark stippling) and the user's progress during previous consumption sessions 212 (shown in light stippling). From this a user can easily determine not only his or her total progress through a digital work, but also how much progress he or she has made during the current or most recent consumption session. It should be understood the progress bar is not limited to the stippling shown in the figures and may include any suitable colors, shading, texture, or other visual elements which convey a user's progress through a digital work.


The progress bar 202 may also include a location slider 214 which represents a location of content presently being displayed, for example on the reading pane 106 of the eBook reader device 100. The location slider 214 generally tracks the user's progress through the digital work, at any given time designating the user's present location in the digital work. However, if the user wishes to reread a portion of the digital work, the location slider will move back to the location presently being reread, while the progress bar 202 will still show the user's overall progress through the digital work. Also, as the name suggests, in some implementations the location slider 214 may be used as a navigation tool to move to a desired section of the digital work. For example, a user desiring to reread chapter four, could move the location slider 214 to the beginning of chapter four on the progress bar (as shown in broken lines in FIG. 2A), and the corresponding content may be displayed in the reading pane 106.


The progress bar 202 may also include any number of visual elements designating bookmarks 216, annotations 218, or other information which may be of interest to the user. Of course, the visual elements used to represent bookmarks, annotations, or any other information are not limited to those illustrated, and any suitable visual elements (e.g., shapes, colors, symbols, numbers, letter, etc.) may be used. Bookmarks 216 provide a way of designating a location of interest within a digital work (e.g., a virtual tab), while annotations 218 typically provide the additional ability to append additional information to the digital work, such as a comment, citation, pointer to another location (e.g., a hyperlink) in the same or another digital work, or virtually any other information. Annotations 218 may be in a variety of formats, depending on the software and hardware provided eBook reader device 100 or other computing device. By way of example and not limitation, annotations may include textual annotations, graphical annotations (e.g., images, handwritten notes, drawings, etc.), audio annotations, video annotations, links to external references, and/or combinations of these annotation types. The annotations 218 may correspond to the digital work in general or to one or more designated portions of the digital work. Bookmarks 216 and/or annotations 218 may be authored and appended to a digital work by a source of the digital work (e.g., publisher, merchant, etc.), by the user after receipt of the digital work, and/or by one or more third party authors (e.g., other users of the digital work).


Other information which may be shown on or in connection with the progress bar 202 includes a relative density of the digital work. Density refers to the amount of content (e.g., number of characters, words, bytes, etc.) per unit of the digital work (e.g., per frame or page, per line, etc.). Changes in density may be illustrated by different colors, shades of the same color, shading, or the like. Changes in density may be shown by a continuously variable gradient or by discreet stepwise changes in color, shading, or other designation.



FIG. 2A shows two triangular visual elements corresponding to bookmarks 216 and a diamond shaped visual element corresponding to an annotation 218. In this implementation, the text or other appended content of the annotation 218 is hidden and displayed only in response to user selection of (e.g., by pointing a cursor 220) the diamond visual indicator corresponding to the annotation 218. However, in other implantations, the content of annotations may appear at all times, or be presented in any other suitable manner. Additional details of illustrative techniques of annotating digital works and presenting annotations can be found in U.S. application Ser. No. 11/039,645, filed Jan. 19, 2005, and entitled “Method and System for Providing Annotations of a Digital Work,” and U.S. application Ser. No. 11/693,682, Filed concurrently herewith and entitled “Providing Annotations of a Digital Work,” both of which are incorporated herein by reference.


All available information may or may not be displayed on the progress bar 202 at once. For example, some of the information associated with the progress bar 202 may be suppressed to avoid cluttering the progress bar 202. This suppression may be automatic, at the request of the user, or both. In that case, suppressed details may be viewed by, for example, zooming in on a specific section of the progress bar 202. Zooming may be performed automatically, for example, upon commencement of a new section of the digital work. In that case, the progress bar 202 may zoom in to show the segment corresponding to the commenced section of the digital work in more detail. Additionally or alternatively, zooming may be performed in response to user selection (e.g., by pointing a cursor 220) of a portion of the digital work, such as the portion circled at B in FIG. 2A.



FIG. 2B is an expanded view of the portion B of the progress bar 202 to which the user has zoomed. As shown, the progress bar 202 now shows the progress bar segment corresponding to Chapter 5 of the digital work in more detail. In this case, Chapter 5 is further divided into five sections (Sec1-Sec5), which are also sized according to the relative size of sections of the digital work to which they correspond. The portion of the digital work prior to Chapter 5 is shown by as a single segment <<Ch4, and the portion of the digital work following Chapter 5 is shown by a single segment Ch6>>. The progress bar 202 in this view is adjusted to show the user's progress through Chapter 5. Also, what appeared as a single bookmark 216 when zoomed out (in FIG. 2A), now appears as three separate bookmarks 216 when zoomed in (in FIG. 2B). That is, visual indicators in close proximity to one another may be consolidated on the progress bar when zoomed out, to avoid clutter.


Also in FIG. 2B, content 222 of the annotation 218 is displayed in response to user selection of the diamond visual indicator of the annotation 218 with the cursor 220. Alternatively, the content 222 of the annotation 218 may be displayed in response to the zooming action and/or in response to the progress bar 202 becoming less cluttered and providing sufficient space to display the content 222. Also, while not shown in this figure, the title pane 104 (see FIG. 1) may change, in response to the zooming, to display a chapter or section title in addition to or instead of the title of the digital work (e.g., Romeo and Juliet—Act 3, Scene 1).



FIG. 2C shows a display screen 224 showing another illustrative progress bar 226. In this implementation, the progress bar 226 includes progress markers 228 indicating the user's progress through the digital work during each consumption session. In the illustrated example, the user has consumed the digital work in seven different sessions (230a-230f), the first six sessions being shown in light stippling, and the last or current session again being shown by the darker stippling.


The display screen 224 in this implementation also includes a time field 232, a rate field 234, a search field 236, and a location field 238 associated with the progress bar 226. The time field 232 in the illustrated example shows a reading time during the current session. However, the time field may designate a variety of additional or alternative time-based information, such as a total elapsed consumption time to the current point in the digital work, an elapsed time during the current consumption session, an estimated remaining time to complete the digital work or a section thereof, a simple countdown timer, a clock, or the like.


The rate field 234 in the illustrated example shows a reading rate at which the user is progressing through the digital work. However, if the digital work were other than a textual work, the rate field 234 may display another rate of consumption of the digital work. The user's reading rate may change over the course of the digital work. The variation in the reading rate may be indicated on the progress bar 226 by different colors, shading, histograms, or the like. Additionally or alternatively, the rate field may show a “cumulative” reading rate for the digital work or a section thereof, or an “instantaneous” reading rate showing the user's reading rate over a more limited period (e.g., the last ten minutes). In one example, the time field 232 may display an estimated time remaining to complete the current chapter or other section of the digital work, based on the user's cumulative or instantaneous reading rate.


The search field 236 allows the user to enter a search term to search within the digital work. In some implementations, the search field 236 may also allow the user to search contents of local memory of the eBook reader or other computing device, remote data stores, and/or the Internet.


The location field 238 displays a present location within the digital work and the total number of locations within the digital work, both in terms of invariant location reference identifiers. As mentioned above, a problem arises when attempting to identify and communicate a page or position within a digital work, due to the variable screen size, font type or size, margins, line spacing, resolution, and other variable display conditions of the computing devices. Invariant location reference identifiers, as their name suggests, make it possible to identify and communicate a specific location or segment of content in the digital work, regardless of screen size, font type or size, resolution, or other display conditions of the computing device on which the digital work is displayed. Generally, this is accomplished by assigning unique reference identifiers at locations throughout the content of a digital work, or to individual segments of the digital work. These reference identifiers are not dependent on display conditions of a computing device on which the digital work is displayed. In that sense, the reference characters are invariant.


There are numerous ways of providing invariant location reference identifiers in, or in association with, content of a digital work. In addition, there are a variety of ways in which digital works may be partitioned and assigned invariant location reference identifiers. For example, each invariant location reference identifier may be assigned to an individual character or word, a group of words, a sentence, a paragraph, a band of text of predetermined size, a unit of data, or some other division of the digital work. Additional details of invariant location reference identification schemes can be found in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/693,677, filed concurrently herewith, and entitled “Invariant Referencing in Digital Works,” which is incorporated herein by reference.



FIG. 2D illustrates another display screen 240 including another illustrative progress bar 242. In this implementation, a number of information bars may also be provided with the progress bar 242, including a goal bar 244 illustrating a consumption goal for the user and an assignment bar 246 illustrating an assigned consumption level. By way of example, the goal bar 244 may be manually entered by the user or automatically generated based on the user's reading rate, age, or some other criteria. The assignment bar 246 may be manually entered by the user or may be assigned by a third party (e.g., a reading assignment from a professor) over a network.


Also in this implementation, a second progress bar is displayed along with the first progress bar 242. The second progress bar in this implementation comprises an “Others' Progress” bar 248, showing the progress of one or more other users. Such an “Others' Progress” bar 248 may be used by a teacher to monitor progress of individual students in a class. Alternatively, students might have an “Others' Progress” bar 248 showing the progress of their peers through a digital work. In FIG. 2D, the “Others' Progress” bar 248 illustrates a class average progress in light stippling, and a class leader progress in darker stippling. These and numerous other types of progress and/or information bars may additionally or alternatively be presented to a user of the eBook reader or other computing device.



FIG. 2E illustrates a display screen 250 showing yet another illustrative progress gauge 252, namely a semicircular progress gauge. Progress gauges may come in a variety of shapes and sizes, including but not limited to progress bars and semicircular progress gauges. Other suitable progress gauges which may be used to visually represent a user's progress through a digital work may be apparent to those skilled in the art. The progress gauge 252 includes a number of content dividers 254 disposed around the outside of the progress gauge 252 to divide the progress gauge 252 into segments corresponding to sections of the digital work. As in the previous implementations, the segments of the progress gauge 252 are sized to visually represent the relative size of the sections of the digital work. That is, larger sections of the digital work are generally represented by larger segments of the progress gauge 252. Also, the size of the digital work, relative to other digital works, may be visually represented by the size, or in this case, the angle of the progress gauge. Larger digital works being visually represented by a larger angle θ (closer to a full circle), and smaller digital works being represented by a smaller angle θ. Additionally or alternatively, larger books may be visually represented by multiple progress gauges, or portions thereof.


In this implantation a consumption rate field 256, a consumption time field 258, and a location field 260 similar to those described with respect to the implementations above are also displayed in association with the progress gauge 252. Also in this implementation, a part field 262 is displayed, which designates a part of the digital work currently being displayed (in this case Act 3 of the digital work Romeo and Juliet), as well as an annotation field 264, which displays annotation content associated with annotation visual indicators 266 along the progress gauge 252.


While specifics of several illustrative progress gauge implementations have been described, it should be understood that elements of each of the described implementations may be combined, modified, or omitted as desired to arrive at additional progress gauges for eBook reader devices or other computing devices.


Illustrative Collection Progress Gauges


The progress gauges described above are generally displayed in connection with a specific digital work, while the digital work is being consumed (“in-work”). However, many of the same or similar features of the foregoing progress gauges are applicable to a collection of digital works as well. Details of a few such illustrative progress gauges are described below.



FIG. 3 illustrates an eBook reader device 300, on which is presented an illustrative collection interface 302 of digital works available for access via the eBook reader device 300. The digital works available via the eBook reader device 300 may include digital works stored locally in memory of the eBook reader device 300 and/or remotely in memory of a remote computing device (e.g., a personal computer, another eBook reader device, a remote storage, or the like). The collection interface 302 may include a heading field 304 to identify the collection. In the illustrated implementation, only one collection is available. However, in some instances, multiple collections may be available for different types of digital works (e.g., texts, music, video, multimedia, etc.), for different genres of digital works (e.g., classics, fiction, biographies, comedies, jazz, rock, country, etc.), and/or for different users of the eBook reader or other computing device (e.g., Mom's digital works, Dad's digital works, Junior's digital works, etc.). In that case, the heading field 304 may identify which of the collections is presently being displayed.


The collection interface 302 also may include a collection field 306 including a list of available digital works. Each digital work in the list includes a title 308 or other identifier, and a progress bar 310 indicating the user's progress through the associated digital work. Where more than one digital work is included in the collection, the collection field 306 also may visually indicate the relative size of the digital works (i.e., larger works have larger progress bars than shorter works). This is illustrated in FIG. 3 by the fact that the progress bar 310 associated with the digital work War and Peace is longer than the progress bar associated with the digital work Peter Pan.


The progress bars 310 in the collection interface 302 are generally abbreviated or simplified relative to those described in the foregoing “in-work” implementations. For example, the progress bars 310 shown in FIG. 3 illustrate the user's overall progress and progress during a most recent consumption session, but do not show bookmarks, annotations, or other information which may be available on an “in-work” progress bar. However, the progress bars 310 may, in some instances, include any or all of the aspects described for the progress bars in the preceding implementations.


In some implementations, such as that shown in FIG. 3, a progress bar 310 is shown directly below each digital work in the collection. However, in other implementations, a progress bar may be presented only next to those digital works which the user has begun to consume. Additionally, the size, shape, location, colors, textures, and other characteristics of the progress bars may vary as necessary or desired for a given application. In still other implementations, progress bars may be normally hidden and only displayed in response to selection of, or pointing to, a corresponding digital work in the collection interface 302.


From the collection interface 302 the user may select one or more of the digital works listed in the collection field 306 for consumption. Selection may be accomplished in any known manner, such as by moving a selection box 312 using a thumb wheel, pointing device, touch screen, or any other suitable user input. Upon selection of a digital work from the collection interface, the digital work may be opened and displayed along with an in-work progress gauge, as shown in FIG. 1.



FIG. 4 illustrates another illustrative collection interface 400 usable with the eBook reader 300 or other computing device. The collection interface 400 is similar to that shown in FIG. 3, except that instead of using progress bars to show a users progress through digital works, a number of circular and/or semicircular progress gauges 402 are used. In this implementation, the relative lengths of the digital works included in the collection are shown by a number of whole and/or partial circles associated with each work. The more circles or parts thereof, the longer the digital work. Each circle may represent a predetermined size (e.g., 25,000 words, 10 kilobytes, etc.), with partial circles representing fractions of a whole. The user's progress through each digital work is also shown on the progress gauges 402. In the illustrated implementation, the user's progress during a most recent consumption session is shown in dark stippling, while consumption during previous consumption sessions is shown in lighter stippling. Additional details of the collection interface 400 are the same or similar to collection interface 302 and have, therefore, been omitted for brevity.


Illustrative eBook Reader Device



FIG. 5 illustrates one illustrative eBook reader device 500 which may be used to display digital works along with any of the foregoing progress gauges. However, virtually any other type of computing device may be used. In the illustrated implementation, the device 500 is embodied as a handheld eBook reader device. Various features of the device 500 are described briefly below. However, a fuller description of this illustrative computing device may be found in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/277,893, filed Mar. 29, 2006, and entitled “Handheld Electronic Book Reader Device Having Dual Displays,” which is incorporated herein by reference.


As shown in FIG. 5, the eBook reader device 500 has a body or housing 502, a keyboard 504, and a dual display system comprised of a first display 506 and a second display 508. The device keyboard 304 includes a plurality of alphabetic, numeric, and/or function keys for entry of user input.


The first display 506 in the dual display system presents content in a human-readable format to the user. The content presented in the first display 506 may include digital works, such as electronic books, newspapers, or other readable or viewable materials. For example, the display 506 provides the text of the electronic books and also depicts any illustrations, tables, or graphic elements which might be contained in the electronic books.


The second display 508 of the dual display system is a narrow screen located adjacent to the content display 506. The narrow display 508 is illustrated as being positioned to the right of the content display 506, although it may be located elsewhere in the housing 502 in other implementations. The narrow display screen 508 may be responsive to user input registered via, for example, a finger, a stylus, or other similar pointing device. Additionally, the narrow display screen 508 may enable presentation of graphic elements which correspond to content displayed in the content display 506.


The eBook reader device 500 may also include a variety of user inputs 510 to navigate through and among eBooks and digital works. Examples of user inputs that may be present include buttons, scroll wheels, thumb wheels, thumb sticks, sensors which detect and register movement of a user's thumb or finger, tactile sensors, or any other conventional user input mechanism.


The eBook reader device 500 also has various internal components, which are referred to generally as eBook reader subsystems 512. In one implementation, the subsystems 512 include system storage 514 and a processing unit 516. The processing unit 516 interacts with the system storage 514 to facilitate operation of the eBook reader device 500. The system storage 514 may be used to store one or more eBooks 518, annotations 520, authentication certificates 522, and other content, as well as software programs or other executable modules 524 which may be executed by the processing unit 516. Examples of such programs or modules include a progress gauge module 524a for generating and/or presenting a progress gauge, an indexing module 524b for indexing eBooks with invariant location reference identifiers, a reader module 524c, one or more control modules 524d (e.g., power management), network connection module 524e, as well as various other modules which are not shown, such as operating models, display drivers, sensor algorithms, page turn detectors, and the like. If included, the progress gauge module 524a may generate any of the progress gauges described herein. In some implementations, metadata describing the components of the progress gauge and how they should be displayed may be embedded in the digital work data file itself, attached as a separate interface data file, or otherwise appended to the digital work. In other implementations, the progress gauge module 524a may include logic to generate the progress gauge on the fly from the format and/or content of the digital work itself. Various other approaches to generating the progress gauges may also be used and will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art.


In addition to the system storage 514, the eBook reader device 500 may have access to one or more sources of remote storage 526 over a network or on a peer-to-peer basis. The sources of remote storage 526 may be accessible using a network connection module, for example, and may be in communication via a wired or wireless connection. The remote storage 526 may include a personal computer, another eBook reader, or any other suitable remote storage device.


The system storage 514 and remote storage 526 may include volatile memory (such as RAM), nonvolatile memory, removable memory, and/or non-removable memory, implemented in any method or technology for storage of information, such as computer-readable instructions, data structures, program modules, or other data. Also, the processing unit 516 may include onboard memory in addition to or instead of the system storage 514. Some examples of storage media which may be included in the system storage 514 and/or processing unit 516 include, but are not limited to, RAM, ROM, EEPROM, flash memory or other memory technology, CD-ROM, digital versatile disks (DVD) or other optical storage, magnetic cassettes, magnetic tape, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other medium which can be used to store the desired information and which can be accessed by the eBook reader device 500. Any such computer storage media may be part of the eBook reader device 500.


Various instructions, methods and techniques described herein may be considered in the general context of computer-executable instructions, such as program modules, executed by one or more computers or other devices. Generally, program modules include routines, programs, objects, components, data structures, etc. for performing particular tasks or implementing particular abstract data types. These program modules and the like may be executed as native code or may be downloaded and executed, such as in a virtual machine or other just-in-time compilation execution environment. Typically, the functionality of the program modules may be combined or distributed as desired in various implementations. An implementation of these modules and techniques may be stored on or transmitted across some form of computer-readable media.


The above-described eBook reader device 500 or other computing devices may store software instructions that, when executed, implement aspects and features of the present invention. For example, such software can be stored on a computer-accessible medium (e.g., magnetic or optical disk or other device), or downloaded from a remote source, for loading into memory of the eBook reader 500 or other computing device to be executed by the processing unit 516.


Illustrative Method of Presenting In-Work Progress Gauges



FIG. 6 is a flowchart showing an illustrative method 600 of presenting a progress gauge along with content of a digital work. The method 600 may be implemented using an eBook reader device, such as the one shown in FIG. 5, or any other suitable digital work computing device capable of displaying digital works.


At 602, content of a digital work is presented to a user. In the illustrated implementation, the content of the digital work (e.g., text, graphics, video, etc.) is displayed in a reading pane 106 on a display screen 102 of an eBook reader device 100 or other computing device. A progress gauge is also presented, at 604, along with the content in the reading pane 106. In some implementations, the progress gauge 110 may be presented along a border of the reading pane. However, in other implementations, the progress gauge may be positioned and sized in a variety of other manners. For example, the progress gauge may be overlaid on a portion of the content of the digital work. The progress gauge indicates the user's progress through the digital work. In some implementations, the progress gauge may also indicate the user's progress through the digital work in a most recent or current consumption session. In the described implementation, the progress gauge comprises a progress bar. However, in other implementations, the progress gauge may be semicircular, circular, triangular, square, or any other shape or size which may be used to show a user's progress through a digital work.


At 606, one or more content dividers may be presented to divide the progress bar into segments corresponding to sections of the digital work. The content dividers may be tick marks, as shown in FIG. 2A, for example, or may take the form of any other suitable visual indicator that illustrates a boundary between one segment and the next. At 608, the segments defined by the content dividers are sized to visually represent an amount of content in corresponding sections of the digital work. That is, larger segments are used to represent larger sections of the digital work, while smaller segments are used to represent smaller sections of the digital work. In some implementations, the segments are sized proportionally to the sections of the digital work that they represent. In the case where the progress gauge is a progress bar, segment length can be sized based on the size of the corresponding section of the digital work. In some implementations, the segments may be sized according to a linear function to be proportional in size to the corresponding segments of the digital work. In that case, the segments may be sized according to the following equation: SL=(CS/CT)*PL. SL is the segment length, CS is the amount of content in the section of the digital work corresponding to the segment, CT is the total amount of content in the digital work, and PL is the total length of the progress bar. In other implementations, however, the segments may be sized according to a non-linear function, such that the segments are non-proportional as described in more detail above in the section entitled “Illustrative In-Work Progress Gauges.”


At 610, start, end, and location markers are presented to designate the beginning of the digital work, end of the digital work, and a present location of the user in the digital work, respectively. The location marker may, in some implementations, comprise a location slider, which is movable by a user to navigate to a desired location within the digital work. When not being used for navigation, the location marker typically follows the progress bar to designate the user's present location within the digital work.


Depending on the size of the digital work, the amount of information associated with the progress bar, user preference, and the like, it may be desirable to show less than all of the available information on the progress bar at a given time. For example, in some instances it may be desirable to display a progress bar of the whole digital work, showing only coarse divisions (e.g., volumes, chapters, acts, etc.) as a default. Also, multiple proximate visual indicators (e.g., bookmarks, annotations, etc.) may be consolidated in this coarse view, to avoid clutter. If desired, a portion of the progress bar corresponding to one or more sections may then be expanded, at 612, to display additional information, such as finer divisions (e.g., sections, scenes, etc.), bookmarks, annotations, and the like. This expansion may be performed automatically, for example, at the commencement of a new chapter, section, or other part of the digital work, or on the happening of some other event where expansion would be desirable. Additionally or alternatively, the expansion may be performed in response to a user request to zoom in on the expanded section of the progress bar.


Additional information may also be shown with the progress gauge in a number of other ways. For example, at 614, information on the progress bar may be toggled to display additional or alternative information. In the illustrated implementation, toggling is performed in response to user selection of the progress bar by, for example, pointing to or clicking on or near the progress bar. Toggling may also be performed automatically in response to certain circumstances (e.g., consumption of a certain type of digital work) or periodically (e.g., every thirty seconds). At 616, one such piece of additional information, a user's rate of progress through the digital work, is displayed. At 618, other additional information is displayed, in the form of one or more bookmarks and/or annotations. The bookmarks and/or annotations may be associated with, and point to, specified content in the digital work. Bookmarks and annotations may originate from a publisher, author, distributor, or other “source” of the digital work or a consumer or other “user” of the digital work subsequent to distribution or sale of the digital work.


It should be understood that certain acts in method 600 need not be performed in the order described, may be modified and/or may be omitted entirely, depending on the circumstances. For example, sizing the segments according to the equation in act 608 only applies if the progress gauge comprises a progress bar. Also, the acts of expanding 612, toggling 614, displaying progress rate 616, and displaying bookmarks and/or annotations 618, all may be omitted in various implementations.


Illustrative Method of Presenting Collection Progress Gauges



FIG. 7 is a flowchart showing an illustrative method 700 of presenting a collection interface. The method 700 may be implemented on an eBook reader device, such as that shown in FIG. 5, or any other suitable digital work computing device capable of displaying digital works.


At 702, a collection of digital works available on the computing device is presented to the user. The collection of available digital works may include works stored in local memory of the computing device and/or remote storage, such as in memory of a personal computer, another eBook reader device, or other remote data store. A progress gauge is presented, at 704, associated with one or more of the digital works in the collection. In some implementations the progress gauge comprises a progress bar. Also in some implementations, a progress bar is associated with each digital work in the collection. However, in other implementations, only those digital works which the user has begun consuming will have a progress gauge associated with them. Each progress gauge may be presented above, below, beside, or in any other suitable location in association with the corresponding digital work.


In addition to the user's total progress through a digital work, at 706, a user's progress through the digital work during a most recent or current session is indicated on the progress gauge.


From the collection interface a user can select any of the listed digital works for consumption. At 708, a request is received by the eBook reader device to open a digital work listed in the collection and, in response, at 710, the eBook reader device opens the digital work. From here, the method proceeds at A to presentation of the digital work along with an “in-work” progress gauge, at block A in FIG. 6.


It should be understood that certain acts in method 700 need not be performed in the order described, may be modified and/or may be omitted entirely, depending on the circumstances. For example, in some instances, the act 706 of indicating a user's progress during a most recent consumption session may be omitted.


Moreover, any of the acts of any of the methods described herein may be implemented at least partially by a processor or other computing device based on instructions stored on one or more computer-readable media. Computer-readable media can be any available media which can be accessed by a preprocessing system, computing device, and/or digital work, as appropriate. By way of example, and not limitation, computer-readable media may comprise computer storage media and communication media. Computer storage media includes volatile and nonvolatile, removable and non-removable media implemented in any method or technology for storage of information such as computer-readable instructions, data structures, program modules or other data. Computer storage media includes, but is not limited to, RAM, ROM, EEPROM, flash memory or other memory technology, CD-ROM, digital versatile disks (DVD) or other optical storage, magnetic cassettes, magnetic tape, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other medium which can be used to store the desired information and which can accessed by the preprocessing system, computing device, and/or digital work. Combinations of the any of the above should also be included within the scope of computer-readable media.


CONCLUSION

Although the subject matter has been described in language specific to structural features and/or methodological acts, it is to be understood that the subject matter defined in the appended claims is not necessarily limited to the specific features or acts described. Rather, the specific features and acts are disclosed as illustrative forms of implementing the claims. For example, the methodological acts need not be performed in the order or combinations described herein, and may be performed in any combination of one or more acts.

Claims
  • 1. A system comprising: one or more processors;memory comprising a reader module and a progress bar presentation module executable on the one or more processors: the reader module to present a page of paginated text characters of a plurality of pages of paginated text characters of an electronic text on a display;the progress bar presentation module to present a progress bar on the display concurrently with the page of paginated text characters and to revise the progress bar based on a user input to turn at least one page of paginated text characters to at least another page of paginated text characters, the progress bar including; a segmented portion indicating a user's progress of a previous consumption session of the plurality of pages of paginated text characters displayed simultaneously with another segmented portion indicating the user's progress of a current consumption session of the plurality of pages of paginated text characters, andcontent dividers dividing the progress bar into segments corresponding to sections of the electronic text including front matter, primary content, and back matter,wherein each segment of the progress bar represents an amount of paginated text characters in the corresponding section of the electronic text, relative to other sections of the electronic text.
  • 2. The system of claim 1, wherein the memory further comprises a collection of electronic texts available for access via the system, wherein the progress bar is presented in association with at least one electronic text in the collection of electronic texts and indicates the user's progress through the at least one electronic text.
  • 3. The system of claim 2, wherein the progress bar presentation module is configured to present a progress bar in association with each electronic text in the collection of electronic texts.
  • 4. The system of claim 2, wherein the progress bar presentation module is configured to present multiple progress bars, each progress bar being presented in association with an electronic text in the collection of electronic texts.
  • 5. The system of claim 2, further comprising remote storage configured to store electronic texts, wherein the collection of electronic texts available via the system includes electronic texts stored in the memory and electronic texts stored in the remote storage.
  • 6. A computer-implemented method of presenting a user's progress through an electronic text, the method comprising: causing a page of paginated text characters of the electronic text to be presented on a display;causing a progress gauge to (1) indicate the user's progress through a plurality of pages of the paginated text characters of the electronic text based on the user turning respective pages of the plurality of pages of the paginated text characters of the electronic text, and (2) causing the progress gauge to be presented on the display concurrently with the page of paginated text characters of the electronic text, wherein the progress gauge includes; a segmented portion indicating a user's progress of a previous consumption session of the plurality of pages of paginated text characters of the electronic text displayed simultaneously with another segmented portion indicating a user's progress during a current consumption session of the plurality of pages of paginated text characters of the electronic text, andone or more content dividers dividing the progress gauge into segments including front matter, primary content, and back matter, each segment of the progress gauge corresponding to a section of the electronic text,wherein each segment of the progress gauge visually represents an amount of paginated text characters in the corresponding section of the electronic text, relative to other sections of the electronic text.
  • 7. The computer-implemented method of claim 6, wherein the segments are sized based on an amount of paginated text characters in the corresponding section of the electronic text.
  • 8. The computer-implemented method of claim 6, wherein the segments are sized according to a linear sizing function, such that the segments are proportional in size to the corresponding sections of the electronic text.
  • 9. The computer-implemented method of claim 6, wherein the segments are sized according to a nonlinear sizing function, such that the segments are non-proportional in size to the corresponding sections of the electronic text.
  • 10. The computer-implemented method of claim 6, wherein each segment is sized according to the following relationship: SL=(CS/CT)*PL, where SL is segment length, CS is an amount of paginated text characters in the section of the electronic text corresponding to the segment, CT is a total amount of paginated text characters in the electronic text, and PL is a total length of the progress gauge.
  • 11. The computer-implemented method of claim 6, wherein the progress gauge includes a start marker corresponding to a beginning of the electronic text, an end marker corresponding to an end of the electronic text, and a location marker corresponding to the user's present location in the electronic text.
  • 12. The computer-implemented method of claim 6, wherein the electronic text includes chapters, and segments of the progress gauge correspond to the chapters of the electronic text.
  • 13. The computer-implemented method of claim 6, further comprising causing an expanded portion of the progress gauge to be displayed, wherein the expanded portion of the progress gauge includes additional information related to the user's progress through the electronic text.
  • 14. The computer-implemented method of claim 13, wherein the additional information comprises at least one bookmark pointing to a specified location in the electronic text.
  • 15. The computer-implemented method of claim 13, wherein the additional information comprises at least one annotation of specified paginated text characters in the electronic text.
  • 16. The computer-implemented method of claim 13, wherein the additional information comprises further content dividers dividing the progress bar into finer segments.
  • 17. The computer-implemented method of claim 6, further comprising causing a user's rate of progress through the electronic text to be displayed in association with the progress gauge.
  • 18. The computer-implemented method of claim 6, further comprising causing paginated text characters of the electronic text to be displayed in a reading pane.
  • 19. The computer-implemented method of claim 18, wherein causing the progress gauge to be displayed comprises causing the progress gauge to be displayed along a border of the reading pane.
  • 20. The computer-implemented method of claim 18, wherein causing the progress gauge to be displayed comprises causing the progress gauge to be overlaid on the reading pane.
  • 21. The computer-implemented method of claim 6, further comprising causing a bookmark pointing to a specified location in the electronic text to be displayed, the bookmark being located at a position along the progress gauge relative to the specified location in the electronic text.
  • 22. The computer-implemented method of claim 21, wherein the bookmark originates from a source of the electronic text.
  • 23. The computer-implemented method of claim 21, wherein the bookmark originates from a user of the electronic text.
  • 24. The computer-implemented method of claim 6, further comprising a visual element pointing to an annotation of specified paginated text characters in the electronic text to be displayed, the visual element being located along the progress gauge at a position relative to the location of the specified paginated text characters in the electronic text.
  • 25. The computer-implemented method of claim 6, further comprising causing an information bar to be displayed, the information bar visually indicating at least one of the following: progress of the user through a discreet section of the electronic text, progress of the user through a predetermined amount of digital content, progress of another user through the electronic text, consumption rate of the user, an amount of assigned content, a content consumption goal, and a remaining amount of content until end of the electronic text.
  • 26. The computer-implemented method of claim 6, further comprising causing at least two progress gauges to be presented, each progress bar being associated with a different electronic text.
  • 27. The computer-implemented method of claim 26, wherein the progress gauges are sized to visually convey the relative sizes of the electronic texts with which they are associated.
  • 28. The computer-implemented method of claim 6, further comprising causing a collection of electronic texts available for access via a computing device to be displayed, wherein causing the progress gauge to be presented comprises causing the progress gauge to be presented in association with at least one electronic text in the collection of electronic texts, and wherein the progress gauge indicates the user's progress through the at least one electronic text.
  • 29. The computer-implemented method of claim 28, further comprising causing a progress gauge to be displayed in association with each electronic text in the collection of electronic texts, and wherein each progress bar indicates the user's progress through the corresponding electronic text.
  • 30. The computer-implemented method of claim 29, wherein the collection of electronic texts available for access via the computing device includes electronic texts stored in local memory of the computing device and electronic texts stored remotely from the computing device.
  • 31. The computer-implemented method of claim 6, wherein the progress gauge comprises a circular gauge.
  • 32. The computer-implemented method of claim 6, wherein the progress gauge comprises a linear progress bar.
  • 33. A computer-implemented method comprising: causing a collection of electronic texts available for access via a computing device to be presented;causing a first progress gauge to be presented in association with at least one electronic text in the collection of available electronic texts;causing a second progress gauge to be displayed in association with another of the electronic texts in the collection of available electronic texts,wherein each progress gauge includes a segmented portion indicating a user's progress of a previous consumption session of a plurality of pages of paginated text characters displayed simultaneously with another segmented portion indicating a most recent consumption session of a plurality of pages of paginated text characters through each associated electronic text, respectively, andwherein the progress gauges visually convey the relative sizes of the electronic texts with which they are associated relative to one another.
  • 34. The computer-implemented method of claim 33, further comprising displaying a progress gauge associated with each electronic text in the collection of available electronic texts.
  • 35. The computer-implemented method of claim 33, wherein each progress gauge is displayed in response to user selection of the associated electronic text.
  • 36. The computer-implemented method of claim 33, wherein the collection of available electronic texts includes electronic texts stored in local memory of the computing device and electronic texts stored remotely from the computing device.
  • 37. The computer-implemented method of claim 33, further comprising, in response to selection of one of the electronic texts: causing paginated text characters of the selected electronic text to be displayed; andcausing a progress gauge indicating the user's progress through the electronic text to be displayed along with the paginated text characters of the electronic text, wherein the progress gauge includes one or more content dividers dividing the progress gauge into segments, each segment of the progress gauge corresponding to a section of the electronic text.
  • 38. The computer-implemented method of claim 37, wherein each segment of the progress gauge visually represents an amount of paginated text characters in the corresponding section of the electronic text, relative to other sections of the electronic text.
  • 39. The computer-implemented method of claim 33, wherein the progress gauge comprises a circular gauge.
  • 40. The computer-implemented method of claim 33, wherein the progress gauge comprises a linear progress bar.
  • 41. A system comprising: one or more processors;memory comprising a reader module and a progress bar presentation module executable on the one or more processors: the reader module to: paginate text characters of a digital work based at least in part on a screen size of a display and a size of the text characters;present a page of the paginated text characters on the display, an amount of the paginated text characters presented on the display being based at least in part on the screen size of the display and the size of the text characters;the progress bar presentation module to: generate a progress bar based at least in part on the amount of paginated text characters, the progress bar to revise based at least in part on a user input to turn at least one page of paginated text characters to at least another page of paginated text characters,wherein the progress bar includes a segmented portion indicating a user's progress of a previous consumption session of the plurality of pages of paginated text characters displayed simultaneously with another segmented portion indicating the user's progress of a current consumption session of the plurality of pages of paginated text characters; andpresent the progress bar on the display concurrently with the page of paginated text characters.
US Referenced Citations (560)
Number Name Date Kind
2684955 Knowles Sep 1954 A
4622627 Rodriguez et al. Nov 1986 A
4985697 Boulton Jan 1991 A
5418549 Anderson et al. May 1995 A
5495268 Pearson et al. Feb 1996 A
5499359 Vijaykumar Mar 1996 A
5517407 Weiner May 1996 A
5544305 Ohmaye et al. Aug 1996 A
5566098 Lucente et al. Oct 1996 A
5600775 King et al. Feb 1997 A
5623260 Jones Apr 1997 A
5630159 Zancho May 1997 A
5640553 Schultz Jun 1997 A
5659742 Beattie et al. Aug 1997 A
5661635 Huffman et al. Aug 1997 A
5663748 Huffman et al. Sep 1997 A
5696982 Tanigawa et al. Dec 1997 A
5710922 Alley et al. Jan 1998 A
5711922 O'Brien et al. Jan 1998 A
5742905 Pepe et al. Apr 1998 A
5761485 Munyan Jun 1998 A
5765168 Burrows Jun 1998 A
5774109 Winksy et al. Jun 1998 A
5813017 Morris Sep 1998 A
5845278 Kirsch et al. Dec 1998 A
5845301 Rivette et al. Dec 1998 A
5847698 Reavey et al. Dec 1998 A
5892900 Ginter et al. Apr 1999 A
5923861 Bertram et al. Jul 1999 A
5930026 Jacobson et al. Jul 1999 A
5940846 Akiyama Aug 1999 A
5956048 Gaston Sep 1999 A
5960411 Hartman et al. Sep 1999 A
5973681 Tanigawa et al. Oct 1999 A
5991439 Tanaka et al. Nov 1999 A
6018575 Gross et al. Jan 2000 A
6034839 Hamming Mar 2000 A
6037954 McMahon Mar 2000 A
6041335 Merritt et al. Mar 2000 A
6047189 Yun et al. Apr 2000 A
6049334 Bates et al. Apr 2000 A
6049796 Siitonen et al. Apr 2000 A
6064980 Jacobi et al. May 2000 A
6073148 Rowe et al. Jun 2000 A
6105042 Aganovic et al. Aug 2000 A
6113394 Edgar Sep 2000 A
6148340 Bittinger et al. Nov 2000 A
6154757 Krause et al. Nov 2000 A
6160553 Robertson et al. Dec 2000 A
6164974 Carlile et al. Dec 2000 A
6195698 Lillibridge et al. Feb 2001 B1
6201771 Otsuka et al. Mar 2001 B1
6209007 Kelley et al. Mar 2001 B1
6226642 Beranek et al. May 2001 B1
6233318 Picard et al. May 2001 B1
6272461 Meredith et al. Aug 2001 B1
6300947 Kanevsky Oct 2001 B1
6308320 Burch Oct 2001 B1
6313828 Chombo Nov 2001 B1
6331866 Eisenberg Dec 2001 B1
6331867 Eberhard et al. Dec 2001 B1
6335678 Heutschi Jan 2002 B1
6351750 Duga et al. Feb 2002 B1
6385596 Wiser et al. May 2002 B1
6401086 Bruckner Jun 2002 B1
6401239 Miron Jun 2002 B1
6442651 Crow et al. Aug 2002 B2
6449627 Baer et al. Sep 2002 B1
6457030 Adams et al. Sep 2002 B1
6466951 Birkler et al. Oct 2002 B1
6484212 Markowitz et al. Nov 2002 B1
6487669 Waring Nov 2002 B1
6493734 Sachs et al. Dec 2002 B1
6496803 Ho et al. Dec 2002 B1
6529920 Arons et al. Mar 2003 B1
6535857 Clarke, III et al. Mar 2003 B1
6542874 Walker et al. Apr 2003 B1
6559882 Kerchner May 2003 B1
6560699 Konkle May 2003 B1
6574658 Gabber et al. Jun 2003 B1
6629138 Lambert et al. Sep 2003 B1
6631495 Kato et al. Oct 2003 B2
6642947 Feierbach Nov 2003 B2
6658623 Schilit et al. Dec 2003 B1
6685482 Hopp et al. Feb 2004 B2
6687878 Eintracht et al. Feb 2004 B1
6704733 Clark et al. Mar 2004 B2
6721869 Senthil Apr 2004 B1
6724403 Santoro et al. Apr 2004 B1
6725227 Li Apr 2004 B1
6726487 Dalstrom Apr 2004 B1
6735583 Bjarnestam et al. May 2004 B1
6744891 Allen Jun 2004 B1
6744967 Kaminski et al. Jun 2004 B2
6801751 Wood et al. Oct 2004 B1
6803930 Simonson Oct 2004 B1
6804489 Stuppy et al. Oct 2004 B2
6829594 Kitamura Dec 2004 B1
6847966 Sommer et al. Jan 2005 B1
6904449 Quinones Jun 2005 B1
6912398 Domnitz Jun 2005 B1
6933928 Lilienthal Aug 2005 B1
6938076 Meyer et al. Aug 2005 B2
6947922 Glance Sep 2005 B1
6948135 Ruthfield et al. Sep 2005 B1
6953343 Townshend Oct 2005 B2
6966029 Ahern Nov 2005 B1
6980652 Braitberg et al. Dec 2005 B1
6985932 Glaser et al. Jan 2006 B1
6992687 Baird et al. Jan 2006 B1
6999449 Barna et al. Feb 2006 B2
6999565 Delaney et al. Feb 2006 B1
7007015 Nayak Feb 2006 B1
7009596 Seet et al. Mar 2006 B2
7010500 Aarnio Mar 2006 B2
7010751 Shneiderman Mar 2006 B2
7020654 Najmi Mar 2006 B1
7020663 Hay et al. Mar 2006 B2
7054914 Suzuki et al. May 2006 B2
7057591 Hautanen et al. Jun 2006 B1
7062707 Knauft et al. Jun 2006 B1
7071930 Kondo et al. Jul 2006 B2
7080076 Williamson et al. Jul 2006 B1
7089292 Roderick et al. Aug 2006 B1
7092116 Calaway Aug 2006 B2
7103848 Barsness et al. Sep 2006 B2
7107533 Duncan et al. Sep 2006 B2
7111250 Hayward et al. Sep 2006 B1
7130841 Goel et al. Oct 2006 B1
7133506 Smith Nov 2006 B1
7135932 Quadir et al. Nov 2006 B2
7149776 Roy et al. Dec 2006 B1
7165217 Kondo Jan 2007 B1
7181502 Incertis Feb 2007 B2
7188085 Pelletier Mar 2007 B2
7191346 Abe et al. Mar 2007 B2
7209888 Frid-Nielsen et al. Apr 2007 B2
7216116 Nilsson et al. May 2007 B1
7237123 LeVine et al. Jun 2007 B2
7246118 Chastain et al. Jul 2007 B2
7249046 Katsurabayashi et al. Jul 2007 B1
7249060 Ling Jul 2007 B2
7249324 Nakamura et al. Jul 2007 B2
7257577 Fagin et al. Aug 2007 B2
7287068 Eriksson et al. Oct 2007 B1
7290285 McCurdy et al. Oct 2007 B2
7298851 Hendricks et al. Nov 2007 B1
7304635 Seet et al. Dec 2007 B2
7310629 Mendelson et al. Dec 2007 B1
7313759 Sinisi Dec 2007 B2
7349901 Ramarathnam et al. Mar 2008 B2
7350704 Barsness et al. Apr 2008 B2
7355591 Sugimoto Apr 2008 B2
7375649 Gueziec May 2008 B2
7383505 Shimizu et al. Jun 2008 B2
7386480 Sarig Jun 2008 B2
7386804 Ho et al. Jun 2008 B2
7398244 Keith Jul 2008 B1
7401286 Hendricks et al. Jul 2008 B1
7454238 Vinayak et al. Nov 2008 B2
7461406 Pelly et al. Dec 2008 B2
7496767 Evans Feb 2009 B2
7506246 Hollander et al. Mar 2009 B2
7506356 Gupta et al. Mar 2009 B2
7509270 Hendricks et al. Mar 2009 B1
7519278 Ikeda et al. Apr 2009 B2
7533152 Stark et al. May 2009 B2
7539478 Herley et al. May 2009 B2
7546618 Bacon Jun 2009 B2
7558884 Fuller et al. Jul 2009 B2
7562032 Abbosh et al. Jul 2009 B2
7562038 Brumfield et al. Jul 2009 B1
7574653 Croney et al. Aug 2009 B2
7574658 Kisanuki Aug 2009 B2
7631013 Parsons et al. Dec 2009 B2
7634429 Narin et al. Dec 2009 B2
7656127 Shutt et al. Feb 2010 B1
7657459 Anderson et al. Feb 2010 B2
7657831 Donahue Feb 2010 B2
7680849 Heller et al. Mar 2010 B2
7716224 Reztlaff, II et al. May 2010 B2
7720892 Healey, Jr. et al. May 2010 B1
7747949 Incertis Carro Jun 2010 B2
7760986 Beuque Jul 2010 B2
7788369 McAllen et al. Aug 2010 B2
7792756 Plastina et al. Sep 2010 B2
7835989 Hendricks et al. Nov 2010 B1
7849393 Hendricks et al. Dec 2010 B1
7865405 Hendricks et al. Jan 2011 B2
7865567 Hendricks et al. Jan 2011 B1
7865817 Ryan et al. Jan 2011 B2
7870022 Bous et al. Jan 2011 B2
7890848 Bodin et al. Feb 2011 B2
7900133 Cragun et al. Mar 2011 B2
7908628 Swart et al. Mar 2011 B2
7920112 Kurihara et al. Apr 2011 B2
7920320 Watson et al. Apr 2011 B2
8018431 Zehr et al. Sep 2011 B1
8117128 Ishibashi Feb 2012 B2
8131647 Siegel et al. Mar 2012 B2
8161198 Kikuchi Apr 2012 B2
8165998 Semerdzhiev Apr 2012 B2
8175925 Rouaix May 2012 B1
8209623 Barletta et al. Jun 2012 B2
8244468 Scalisi et al. Aug 2012 B2
8260915 Ashear Sep 2012 B1
8312096 Cohen et al. Nov 2012 B2
8341210 Lattyak et al. Dec 2012 B1
8370196 Choi et al. Feb 2013 B2
8370341 Cromwell et al. Feb 2013 B1
8417772 Lin et al. Apr 2013 B2
8429028 Hendricks et al. Apr 2013 B2
8452797 Paleja et al. May 2013 B1
8510247 Kane, Jr. et al. Aug 2013 B1
8601084 Carlander Dec 2013 B2
8631451 Bennett et al. Jan 2014 B2
8725565 Ryan May 2014 B1
8793575 Lattyak et al. Jul 2014 B1
9137322 Hamada et al. Sep 2015 B2
9268367 Aguera y Arcas et al. Feb 2016 B2
20010007980 Ishibashi et al. Jul 2001 A1
20010025302 Suzuki et al. Sep 2001 A1
20010026287 Watanabe Oct 2001 A1
20010027450 Shinoda et al. Oct 2001 A1
20010027478 Meier et al. Oct 2001 A1
20010036822 Mead et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010037328 Pustejovsky et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010039493 Pustejovsky et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010049623 Aggarwal et al. Dec 2001 A1
20010050658 Adams Dec 2001 A1
20010052855 Ogilvie Dec 2001 A1
20010053975 Kurihara Dec 2001 A1
20020002540 DeMello et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020010707 Chang et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020010759 Hitson et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020012134 Calaway Jan 2002 A1
20020023010 Rittmaster et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020026443 Chang et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020035697 McCurdy et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020046261 Iwata et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020049717 Routtenberg et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020054059 Schneiderman May 2002 A1
20020057286 Markel et al. May 2002 A1
20020059415 Chang et al. May 2002 A1
20020069222 McNeely Jun 2002 A1
20020069312 Jones Jun 2002 A1
20020087532 Barritz et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020090934 Mitchelmore Jul 2002 A1
20020091584 Clark et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020092031 Dudkiewicz et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020095468 Sakata Jul 2002 A1
20020101447 Carro Aug 2002 A1
20020103809 Starzl et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020111907 Ling Aug 2002 A1
20020120635 Joao Aug 2002 A1
20020120650 d'Aquin Aug 2002 A1
20020123336 Kamada Sep 2002 A1
20020126140 Gorbet et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020129012 Green Sep 2002 A1
20020138291 Vaidyanathan et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020138649 Cartmell et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020143822 Brid et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020147724 Fries et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020152473 Unger Oct 2002 A1
20020154157 Sherr et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020165707 Call Nov 2002 A1
20020169615 Kruger et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020184319 Willner et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020194474 Natsuno et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030005002 Chen et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030009459 Chastain et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030012216 Novaes Jan 2003 A1
20030018720 Chang et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030025731 Chastain et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030028395 Rodgers et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030040970 Miller Feb 2003 A1
20030046233 Ara et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030052928 Williams Mar 2003 A1
20030056139 Murray et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030058265 Robinson et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030065642 Zee Apr 2003 A1
20030069812 Yuen et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030076513 Sugimoto et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030078986 Ayres et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030085916 Thiry et al. May 2003 A1
20030090572 Belz et al. May 2003 A1
20030093312 Ukita et al. May 2003 A1
20030093382 Himeno et al. May 2003 A1
20030097354 Finlay et al. May 2003 A1
20030097361 Huang et al. May 2003 A1
20030105679 Krishnan et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030110503 Perkes Jun 2003 A1
20030126123 Kodama Jul 2003 A1
20030129963 Nurcahya Jul 2003 A1
20030135495 Vagnozzi Jul 2003 A1
20030152894 Townshend Aug 2003 A1
20030163399 Harper et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030164844 Kravitz et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030177112 Gardner Sep 2003 A1
20030182551 Frantz et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030190145 Copperman et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030191737 Steele et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030204496 Ray et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030212613 Sarig Nov 2003 A1
20040002943 Merrill et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040003344 Lai et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040003398 Donian et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040015467 Fano Jan 2004 A1
20040019564 Goldthwaite et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040023191 Brown et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040030686 Cardno et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040044723 Bell et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040049743 Bogward Mar 2004 A1
20040054499 Starzyk et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040068471 Kato Apr 2004 A1
20040078273 Loeb et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040078757 Golovchinsky et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040088328 Cook et al. May 2004 A1
20040098350 Labrou et al. May 2004 A1
20040117189 Bennett Jun 2004 A1
20040122912 Kim et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040128359 Horvitz et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040139400 Allam et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040140975 Saito et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040167822 Chasen et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040181467 Raiyani et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040201633 Barsness et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040205457 Bent et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040210561 Shen Oct 2004 A1
20040212635 Mussini Oct 2004 A1
20040212941 Haas et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040229194 Yang Nov 2004 A1
20040237033 Woolf et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040239703 Angelica Dec 2004 A1
20040243613 Pourheidari Dec 2004 A1
20040252692 Shim et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040254013 Quraishi et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040254917 Brill et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040267552 Gilliam et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040268232 Tunning Dec 2004 A1
20040268253 DeMello et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050021464 Lindauer et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050022113 Hanlon Jan 2005 A1
20050044148 Son et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050044224 Jun et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050066219 Hoffman et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050069225 Schneider et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050069849 McKinney et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050076012 Manber et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050086514 Han et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050088410 Chaudhri Apr 2005 A1
20050091604 Davis Apr 2005 A1
20050097007 Alger et al. May 2005 A1
20050102618 Naito May 2005 A1
20050125222 Brown et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050132281 Pan et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050138007 Amitay Jun 2005 A1
20050138428 McAllen et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050144221 Shin et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050144895 Grimes et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050149985 Okamoto Jul 2005 A1
20050154601 Halpern et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050176438 Li Aug 2005 A1
20050177562 Raciborski Aug 2005 A1
20050177567 Hughes et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050193330 Peters Sep 2005 A1
20050195975 Kawakita Sep 2005 A1
20050198070 Lowry Sep 2005 A1
20050222977 Zhou et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050223315 Shimizu et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050228836 Bacastow et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050246374 Blinn et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050250439 Leslie Nov 2005 A1
20050256822 Hollingsworth Nov 2005 A1
20050257261 Shraim et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050262258 Kohno et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050289394 Arrouye et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060004840 Senda Jan 2006 A1
20060020469 Rast Jan 2006 A1
20060031316 Forstadius Feb 2006 A1
20060045470 Poslinski Mar 2006 A1
20060047830 Nair et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060047844 Deng Mar 2006 A1
20060048047 Tao Mar 2006 A1
20060048184 Poslinski Mar 2006 A1
20060053045 Danielson et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060053364 Hollander et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060057960 Tran Mar 2006 A1
20060061595 Goede et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060069697 Shraim et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060071754 Tofts et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060075205 Martin et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060075444 Dillen Apr 2006 A1
20060077897 Kotzin Apr 2006 A1
20060080261 Christal Apr 2006 A1
20060095404 Adelman et al. May 2006 A1
20060095459 Adelman et al. May 2006 A1
20060098900 King et al. May 2006 A1
20060101328 Albornoz et al. May 2006 A1
20060109242 Simpkins May 2006 A1
20060123053 Scannell Jun 2006 A1
20060129618 Maier Jun 2006 A1
20060129924 Nelson et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060143558 Albornoz et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060145950 Tanaka Jul 2006 A1
20060156222 Chi et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060161578 Siegel et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060161635 Lamkin et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060175983 Crouse et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060179137 Jennings et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060190489 Vohariwatt et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060190568 Patterson Aug 2006 A1
20060195431 Holzgrafe et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060209175 Cohen et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060235803 Romney Oct 2006 A1
20060236240 Lebow Oct 2006 A1
20060240799 Kim et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060250994 Sasaki et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060253441 Nelson Nov 2006 A1
20060253458 Dixon et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060253461 de Bonet Nov 2006 A1
20060256083 Rosenberg Nov 2006 A1
20060265518 Owens et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060271629 MacDowell Nov 2006 A1
20060281058 Mangoaela Dec 2006 A1
20060282797 Barsness et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070005570 Hurst-Hiller et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070005616 Hay et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070005757 Finger et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070014404 Cha Jan 2007 A1
20070016555 Ito et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070025704 Tsukazaki et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070039023 Kataoka Feb 2007 A1
20070050346 Goel et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070055926 Christiansen et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070061335 Ramer et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070061337 Saito et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070061803 Barrett Mar 2007 A1
20070073596 Alexander et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070078273 Hirota Apr 2007 A1
20070079236 Schrier et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070079383 Gopalakrishnan Apr 2007 A1
20070089053 Uhlig et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070094285 Agichtein et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070094351 Kalish et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070097073 Takashima et al. May 2007 A1
20070105536 Tingo, Jr. May 2007 A1
20070112817 Danninger May 2007 A1
20070118533 Ramer et al. May 2007 A1
20070130109 King et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070136660 Gurcan et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070136679 Yang Jun 2007 A1
20070142934 Boercsoek et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070150456 Lian et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070162961 Tarrance et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070174545 Okada et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070185865 Budzik et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070189719 Furumachi Aug 2007 A1
20070201702 Hendricks et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070208751 Cowan et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070219983 Fish Sep 2007 A1
20070220419 Stibel et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070233562 Lidwell et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070233692 Lisa et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070234209 Williams Oct 2007 A1
20070238077 Strachar Oct 2007 A1
20070240187 Beach et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070242225 Bragg et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070250573 Rothschild Oct 2007 A1
20070256020 Haga Nov 2007 A1
20070282809 Hoeber et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070283158 Danseglio Dec 2007 A1
20070283173 Webb et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070288853 Neil Dec 2007 A1
20080005097 Kleewein et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080005203 Bots et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080005664 Chandra Jan 2008 A1
20080016064 Sareday et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080016164 Chandra Jan 2008 A1
20080027933 Hussam Jan 2008 A1
20080031595 Cho Feb 2008 A1
20080040233 Wildman et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080059702 Lu et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080066155 Abraham Mar 2008 A1
20080082518 Loftesness Apr 2008 A1
20080082903 McCurdy et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080082911 Sorotokin et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080089665 Thambiratnam et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080100568 Koch et al. May 2008 A1
20080111788 Rosenberg et al. May 2008 A1
20080113614 Rosenblatt May 2008 A1
20080115224 Jogand-Coulomb et al. May 2008 A1
20080120101 Johnson et al. May 2008 A1
20080120280 Iijima et al. May 2008 A1
20080133479 Zelevinsky et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080154908 Datar et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080163039 Ryan et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080164304 Narasimhan et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080165141 Christie Jul 2008 A1
20080168073 Siegel et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080198139 Lacroix et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080208833 Basmov Aug 2008 A1
20080222552 Batarseh et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080235351 Banga et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080243788 Reztlaff, II et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080243814 Gurcan et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080243828 Reztlaff, II et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080259057 Brons Oct 2008 A1
20080270930 Slosar Oct 2008 A1
20080293450 Ryan et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080294674 Reztlaff, II et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080295039 Nguyen et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080298083 Watson et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080301820 Stevens Dec 2008 A1
20080320396 Mizrachi et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090094528 Gray et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090094540 Gray et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090181649 Bull et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090228774 Matheny et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090231233 Liberatore Sep 2009 A1
20090241054 Hendricks Sep 2009 A1
20090263777 Kohn Oct 2009 A1
20090267909 Chen et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090296331 Choy Dec 2009 A1
20090319482 Norlander et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100023259 Krumm et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100081120 Nanjiani et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100095340 Ei et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100125876 Craner et al. May 2010 A1
20100131385 Harrang et al. May 2010 A1
20100156913 Ortega et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100164888 Okumura et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100188327 Frid et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100284036 Ahn et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100328223 Mockarram-Dorri et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110050591 Kim et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110050594 Kim et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110057884 Gormish et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110069073 Unger Mar 2011 A1
20110112671 Weinstein May 2011 A1
20110119165 Zee May 2011 A1
20110191710 Jang et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110261030 Bullock Oct 2011 A1
20110267333 Sakamoto et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110295926 Battiston et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120001923 Weinzimmer et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120016774 Dicke et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120036431 Ito et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120041941 King et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120079372 Kandekar et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120096373 Aguera y Arcas et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120197998 Kessel et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120227001 Gupta et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120240081 Sim et al. Sep 2012 A1
20130138531 Baughman et al. May 2013 A1
20130219320 Seet et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130246157 Puppin et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130326253 Lam et al. Dec 2013 A1
20140218286 Kim Aug 2014 A1
20150269488 Galai et al. Sep 2015 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (50)
Number Date Country
1362682 Aug 2002 CN
1841373 Oct 2006 CN
101120358 Feb 2008 CN
1197902 Apr 2002 EP
1544720 Jun 2005 EP
6274493 Sep 1994 JP
07078139 Mar 1995 JP
09179870 Jul 1997 JP
10091640 Apr 1998 JP
11074882 Mar 1999 JP
2000501214 Feb 2000 JP
2001052016 Feb 2001 JP
2001052025 Feb 2001 JP
2001195412 Jul 2001 JP
2001236358 Aug 2001 JP
2001344524 Dec 2001 JP
2002099739 Apr 2002 JP
2002197079 Jul 2002 JP
2002203156 Jul 2002 JP
2002259718 Sep 2002 JP
2002536736 Oct 2002 JP
2003016104 Jan 2003 JP
2003122969 Apr 2003 JP
2003513384 Apr 2003 JP
2003516585 May 2003 JP
2003517158 May 2003 JP
2003186910 Jul 2003 JP
2005056041 Mar 2005 JP
2005100146 Apr 2005 JP
2006011694 Jan 2006 JP
2006107496 Apr 2006 JP
2006129323 May 2006 JP
2006190114 Jul 2006 JP
2008071334 Mar 2008 JP
2008516297 May 2008 JP
2008527580 Jul 2008 JP
2008197634 Aug 2008 JP
1020020020262 Mar 2002 KR
1020050038645 Apr 2005 KR
WO9720274 Jun 1997 WO
WO9720274 Jun 1997 WO
WO0045588 Aug 2000 WO
WO0045588 Aug 2000 WO
WO0075840 Dec 2000 WO
WO0142978 Jun 2001 WO
WO0239206 May 2002 WO
WO 0239206 May 2002 WO
WO2004055647 Jul 2004 WO
WO2006078728 Jul 2006 WO
WO2008042745 Apr 2008 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (299)
Entry
U.S. Appl. No. 11/537,484, filed Sep. 29, 2006, Thomas Ryan, “Expedited Acquisition of a Digital Item Following a Sample Presentation of the Item.”
U.S. Appl. No. 11/537,518, filed Sep. 29, 2006, John Lattyak, “Acquisition of an Item based on a Catalog Presentation of Items.”
U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,314, filed Jun. 14, 2007, John Lattyak; Craig Griffin; Steven Weiss, “Display Dependent Markup Language.”
U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,339, filed Jun. 14, 2007, David Isbister; Marshall Willilams; Nicholas Vaccaro, “Power Management Techniques for a User Device.”
U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,357, filed Jun. 14, 2007, James Reztlaff II; John Lattyak, “Obtaining and Verifying Search Indices.”
U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,363, filed Jun. 14, 2007, James Reztlaff II; Thomas Ryan, “Search Results Generation and Sorting.”
U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,375, filed Jun. 14, 2007, John Lattyak, Girish Bansil Bajaj, Kevin R. Cheung, Thomas Fruchterman, Robert L. Goodwin, Kenneth P. Kiraly, Richard Moore, Subram Narasimhan, Thomas A. Ryan, Michael V. Rykov, Jon Saxton, James C. Slezak, Beryl Tomay, Aviram Zagorie, Gregg Elliott Zehr, “Delivery of Items for Consumption by a User Device.”
U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,376, filed Jun. 14, 2007, Kenneth Kiraly; Thomas Ryan; Gregg Zehr; John Lattyak; Michael Rykov; Girish Bansilal Bajaj; James Slezak; Aviram Zagorie; Richard Moore; Kevin Cheung; Thomas Fruchterman; Robert Goodwin, “Notification of a User Device to Perform an Action.”
U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,378, filed Jun. 14, 2007, John Lattyak; Thomas Ryan; Gregg Zehr; Kenneth Kiraly; Michael Rykov; Girish Bansilal Bajaj; James Slezak; Aviram Zagorie; Richard Moore; Kevin Cheung; Thomas Fruchterman; Robert Goodwin; Xiaotian Guo, “Transfer of Instructions to a User Device.”
U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,381, filed Jun. 14, 2007, Michael Rykov; Girish Bansilal Bajaj; James Slezak; Aviram Zagorie; Richard Moore; Kevin Cheung; Thomas Fruchterman; Robert Goodwin, “Selecting and Providing Items in a Media Consumption System.”
U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,386, filed Jun. 14, 2007, Thomas Ryan; Gregg Zehr; Kenneth Kiraly; John Lattyak; Michael Rykov; Girish Bansilal Bajaj; James Slezak; Aviram Zagorie; Richard Moore; Kevin Cheung; Thomas Fruchterman; Robert Goodwin, “Handling of Subscription-Related Issues in a Media Consumption System.”
U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,390, filed Jun. 14, 2007, Girish Bansilal Bajaj; Michael Rykov; James Slezak; Aviram Zagorie; Richard Moore; Kevin Cheung; Thomas Fruchterman; Robert Goodwin, “Providing User-Supplied Items to a User Device.”
U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,392, filed Jun. 14, 2007, Thomas Ryan; Gregg Zehr; Kenneth Kiraly; John Lattyak; Subram Narasimhan; Michael Rykov; Girish Bansilal Bajaj; James Slezak; Aviram Zagorie; Richard Moore; Kevin Cheung; Thomas Fruchterman; Robert Goodwin, “Administrative Tasks in a Media Consumption System .”
U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,393, filed Jun. 14, 2007, John Lattyak; Michael Rykov; Girish Bansilal Bajaj; James Slezak; Aviram Zagorie; Richard Moore; Kevin Cheung; Thomas Fruchterman; Robert Goodwin,, “Incremental Updates of Items.”
U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,395, filed Jun. 14, 2007, Thomas Ryan; Gregg Zehr; Kenneth Kiraly; John Lattyak; Michael Rykov; Girish Bansilal Bajaj; James Slezak; Aviram Zagorie; Richard Moore; Kevin Cheung; Thomas Fruchterman; Robert Goodwin; James Reztlaff II, “Providing Supplemental Information Based on Hints in a Media Consumption System.”
U.S. Appl. No. 11/963,618, filed Dec. 21, 2007, Michael Rykov; Laurent An Minh Nguyen; Steven Moy, “Dissemination of Periodical Samples.”
U.S. Appl. No. 12/333,215, filed Dec. 11, 2008, Aviram Zagorie; Craig Griffin; John Lattyak; Michael Rykov, “Device-Specific Presentation Control for Electronic Book Reader Devices.”
U.S. Appl. No. 12/351,629, filed Jan. 9, 2009, John Johnston; Weiping Dou; Steven Chase, “Antenna Placement on Portable Device.”
U.S. Appl. No. 12/351,663, filed Jan. 9, 2009, Chris Li; Steven Chase, “Surface Mount Clip for Routing and Grounding Cables.”
Cleveland, Jr. et al., “Questions and Answers about Biological Effects and Potential Hazards of Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields” OET Bulletin 56, Fourth Edition, Aug. 1999, 38 pages.
Cleveland, Jr., et al, “Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields” OET Bulletin 65, Edition 97-01, Aug. 1997, 84 pages.
Means, et al., “Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields”, OET Bulletin 65 Edition 97-01, Jun. 2001, 57 pages.
Oqo “A Full PC That Fits in Your Pocket” Retrieved on Sep. 22, 2008 at <<http://www.oqo.com/support/documentation.html>>.
PCT Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US 08/57848, mailed Jul. 7, 2008 (9 pages).
PCT Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US 08/64387, mailed Sep. 9, 2008 (2 pages).
U.S. Appl. No. 12/360,089, filed Jan. 26, 2009, Thomas Dimson, Janna Hamaker, Eugene Kalenkovich, Tom Killalea, “Aggregation of Highlights.”
U.S. Appl. No. 12/360,744, filed Jan. 27, 2009, Rajiv Kotesh Ghanta; Marcos Frid; Joseph J. Hebenstreit; John T. Kim, “Electronic Device With Haptic Feedback.”
U.S. Appl. No. 12/366,941, filed Feb. 6, 2009, Scott Dixon; Eriel Thomas, “Bundled Digital Content.”
U.S. Appl. No. 12/414,914, filed Mar. 31, 2009, Amit Agarwal; Zaur Kambarov; Tom Killalea, “Questions on Highlighted Passages.”
U.S. Appl. No. 29/331,528, filed Jan. 27, 2009, Chris Green, “User Interface Cluster.”
U.S. Appl. No. 11/277,894, filed Mar. 29, 2006, Jateen P. Parekh, Gregg E. Zehr, and Subram Narasimhan,“Reader Device Content Indexing”.
Bradley, “Plastic Shape Shifter”, retrieved on May 7, 2009 at <<http://www.reactivereports.com/61/61—3.html>>, Chemistry WebMagazine, Issue No. 61, Dec. 2006, 2 pgs.
Cavanaugh “EBooks and Accommodations”, Teaching Expectional Children vol. 35 No. 2 p. 56-61 Copyright 2002 CEC, pp. 56-61.
Chi et al. “eBooks with Indexes that Reorganize Conceptually”, CHI2004, Apr. 24-29, 2004, Vienna, Austria ACM 1-58113-703-06/04/004, pp. 1223-1226.
Davison et al. “The Use of eBooks and Interactive Multimedia, as Alternative Forms of Technical Documentation” SIGDOC'05, Sep. 21-23, 2005, Conventry, United Kingdom, Copyright 2005 ACM 1-59593-175-9/5/0009, pp. 108-115.
Elspass, et al., “Portable Haptic Interface with Active Functional Design”, In Proceedings SPIE Conference on Smart Structures and Integrated Systems, Newport Beach, California, vol. 3668, Mar. 1999, 926-932.
“Haptic History—Machine Haptics (Expansion)” retrieved on May 7, 2009 at <<http://hapticshistory.chc61.uci.cu/haptic/site/pages/Machine-Haptics-Became—5.php.>> from Google's cache, text-only version as webpage appeared on Apr. 16, 2009, 8 pgs.
Jones, et al., “Development of a Tactile Vest”, IEEE Computer Society, In the Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, Mar. 27-28, 2004, pp. 82-89.
Leutwyler, “Shape-shifting Polymer Gels”, retrieved on May 7, 2009 at <<http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=shape-shifting-polymer-ge&print=true>>, Scientific American, Nov. 9, 2000, 1 pg.
Nakatani, et al., “3D Form Display with Shape Memory Alloy”, In Proceedings of 13th International Conference on Artificial Reality and Teleexistence (ICAT), 2003, pp. 179-184.
“Shape Memory Polymer”, retrieved on May 7, 2009 at <<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shape—Memory—Polymer>>, Wikipedia, 8 pgs.
Sohn et al. “Development of a Standard Format for eBooks”, SAC2002, Madrid, Spain, 2002 ACM 1-58113-445-2/02/0, pp. 535-540.
Wellman, et al., “Mechanical Design and Control of a High-Bandwidth Shape Memory Alloy Tactile Display”, Springer-Verlag, In the Proceedings of the International Symposium on Experimental Robotics, Barcelona, Spain, Jun. 1997, pp. 56-66, 12 pgs.
Yoshikawa, et al., “Vertical Drive Micro Actuator for Haptic Display Using Shape Memory Alloy Thin Film”, IEE Japan, Papers of Technical Meeting on Micromachine and Sensor System, Journal Code L2898B, vol. MSS-05, No. 21-44, 2005, pp. 103-108.
Cafesoft.com, “Security Glossary”, dated Oct. 13, 2003, retrieved from the Wayback Machine on Jul. 2, 2009 at <<http://web.archive.org/web/20031013022218/http://cafesoft.com/support/security-glossary.html>>, 6 pages.
PCT Search Report from Application No. PCT/US08/57829, mailed on Aug. 15, 2008, 2 pages.
PCT Search Report from Application No. PCT/US08/64368, mailed on Sep. 22, 2008, 2 pages.
PCT Search Report from Application No. PCT/US07/89105, mailed on Aug. 18, 2008, 4 pages.
PCT Search Report from Application No. PCT/US08/57871, mailed on Nov. 3, 2008, 4 pages.
“A Universally Unique IDentifier (UUID) URN Namespace”, Jul. 2005, IETF, Retrieved on Apr. 21, 2010 at <<http://tools.ietf.org/pdf/rfc4122.pdf>> pp. 1-32.
Bellwood, et al., “UDDI Version 2.04 API Specification UDDI Committee Specification, Jul. 19, 2002”, Oasis, Retrieved on Apr. 21, 2010 via Wayback Machine at <<http://web.archive.org/web/20050314033213/www.oasis-open.org/committees/uddi-spec/doc/tcspecs.htm>> pp. 1-93.
PCT Search Report for PCT Application No. PCT/US10/22060, mailed Mar. 8, 2010 (7 pages).
“Universal Unique Identifier”, dated Dec. 16, 2002. The Open Group, Retrieved on Apr. 21, 2010 via Wayback Machine at <<http://web.archive.org/web/20021216070918/http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9629399/apdxa.htm>> 9 pgs.
“Web Services Architecture: W3C Working Group Note Feb. 11, 2004”, Feb. 11, 2004, W3C, Retrieved on Apr. 21, 2010 via Wayback Machine at <<http://web.archive.org/web/2004040205185/http://www.w3.org/TR/ws-arch/>> pp. 1-98.
Beigbeder, et al., “An Information Retrieval Model Using the Fuzzy Proximity Degree of Term Occurences”, 2005 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, pp. 1018-1022.
Biskup, et al, “Towards a Credential-Based Implementation of Compound Access Control Policies” SACMAT '04, Proceedings of the ninth ACM symposium on Access control models and technologies, Jun. 4, 2004, NY, retrieved from the internet <<http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=990036.990042>>, retrieved Nov. 9, 2010, 10 pages.
Breu, et al., “The Medoc Distributed Electronic Library: Accounting and Security Aspects”, Electronic Publishing, New Models and Opportunities, Proceedings of an ICCC/IFIP Conference, Apr. 14, 1997, pp. 237-249.
Gladney, “Access Control for Large Collections”, NY, vol. 15, No. 2, Apr. 1, 1997, pp. 154-194.
Henke, “Survey on Electronic Book Features”, Open eBook Forum, online, Mar. 20, 2002, retrieved from the internet <http://www.openebook.org/doc—library/surveys/IDPF—eBook—Features—2002.pdf>> retrieved Nov. 8, 2010, pp. 1-14.
Navarro, et al., “Modern Information Retrieval, Chapter 8: Indexing and Searching”, Jan. 1, 1999, Modern Information Retrieval, ACM Press, New York, pp. 191-228.
Ziviani, et al., “Modern Information Retrieval, Text Operations”, Jan. 1, 1999, Modern Information Retrieval, ACM Press, NY, pp. 163-190.
Zobel, et al., “Inverted Files for Text Search Engines” ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 38, No. 2, Jul. 1, 2006, NY, NY, pp. 1-56.
Desmoulins et al., “Pattern-Based Annotations on E-books: From Personal to Shared Didactic Content”, Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop on Wireless adn Mobile Techniques in Education, 2002, 4 pages.
Leach et al, “A Universally Unique IDentifier (UUID) URN Namespace”, Jul. 2005, IETF, retrieved on Apr. 21, 2010 at http://tools.ietf.org/pdf/rfc4122.pdf, 32 pgs.
“Annotation Engine,” Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard Law School <http://cyber.law .harvard. edulproj ectsl annotate.html> [Retrieved Jan. 30, 2004], 3 pages.
“Annotator Instructions,” Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard Law School <<http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/annotate/instructions.html>>, also found at <<http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/cite/instructions.html>>, [Retrieved Jan. 30, 2004], 1 page.
“Annotator Wishlist,” Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard Law School <http://cyber.law.harvard.edulcite/annotate.cgi ?action=print&markup ;center=; view=http%3A%2F%2Fcy > [Retrieved Jan. 30, 2004], 1 page.
Roscheisen, M., et al., “Beyond Browsing: Shared Comments, SOAPs, Trails, and On-Line Communities,” Computer Networks and ISDN Systems 27:739-749, 1995.
Canadian Office Action mailed Apr. 14, 2009 for Canadian Patent Application No. 2594573, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/039,645, 3 pages.
The Chinese Office Action mailed May 9, 2008 for Chinese Patent Application No. 200680002606.2, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/039,645, 22 pages.
The Chinese Second Office Action mailed Jun. 5, 2009 for Chinese Patent Application No. 200680002606.2, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/039,645, 20 pages.
The Chinese Third Office Action mailed Nov. 27, 2009 for Chinese Patent Application No. 200680002606.2, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/039,645, 15 pages.
Carter, S., et al., “Digital Graffiti: Public Annotation of Multimedia Content,” Proceedings o/the CHI2004, Vienna, Austria, Apr. 24-29, 2004, pp. 1207-1210.
Extended European Search Report mailed Dec. 22, 2009, issued in corresponding European Patent Application No. EP 06 71 8773.2, filed Jan. 18, 2006, 9 pages.
The European Search report mailed Dec. 22, 2009 for European Patent Application No. 06718773.2, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/039,645, 9 pages.
Office Action U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,375, mailed Feb. 23, 2010, 15 pages.
The Japanese Office Action mailed Jan. 25, 2011 for Japanese Patent Application No. 2007-552235, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/039,645, 6 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/537,518, mailed on Apr. 28, 2011, John Lattyak, “Acquisition of an Item Based on a Catalog Presentation of Items” 26 pages.
International Search Report mailed Sep. 9, 2008, in International Application No. PCT/US/08/64387, filed May 21, 2008, 1 page.
International Search Report mailed Aug. 15, 2008, in International Application No. PCT/US07/89105, filed Dec. 28, 2007, 2 pages.
International Search Report mailed Aug. 15, 2008, in corresponding International Application No. PCT/US08/57829, filed Mar. 21, 2008, 1 page.
International Search Report mailed Jul. 7, 2008, in International Application No. PCT/US08/57848, filed Mar. 31, 2008, 2 pages.
PCT International Search Report and the Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US 08/64389, mailed on Jan. 28, 2009, 7 pgs.
PCT International Search Report and the Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2006/001752, mailed on Jul. 27, 2006, 8 pgs.
“Say No To Third Voice,” Worldzone.net, 1999-2004, <http://worldzone.netiinternetipixelsnttv/index.html> [retrieved Jan. 30, 2004], 5 pages.
“The Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard Law School: Annotation Engine,” Harvard.Edu, 1999-2004, <http://cyber.iaw.harvard.eduJprojects/annotate.html> [Retrieved Jan. 30, 2004], 3 pages.
Marshall, C.C., “The Future of Annotation in a Digital (Paper) World,” Proceedings o/the 35th Annual GSLIS Clinic, University of Illinois at UrbanaChampaign, Urbana, 11, Mar. 22-24, 1998, pp. 1-19.
Kumar, A., “Third Voice Trails off . . . ,” Wired News, 2004, <http://www.wired.comlnews/printIO. 1294,42803 ,00.html> [retrieved Jan. 30, 2004], 3 pages.
BarnesandNoble.com, “Barnes and Noble Homepage”, retrieved on Aug. 2, 2011 http://web.archive.org/web/19981202183957/http://www.barnesandnoble.com/, Dec. 2, 1998, 2 pages.
Cavanaugh, “EBooks and Accommodations”, Teaching Exceptional Children, vol. 35, No. 2, Copyright 2002 CEC, 6 pages.
The Chinese Office Action mailed Jul. 14, 2011 for Japanese patent application No. 20078004873.9, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Pat. No. 7,865,817, 6 pages.
Chinese Office Action mailed Aug. 25, 2011 for Chinese patent application No. 200880024964.2, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,358, 6 pages.
The European Office Action mailed Mar. 26, 2010 for European Patent Application No. 06718773.2, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/039,645, 1 page.
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/360,089, mailed on Oct. 5, 2011, Killalea et al., “Aggregation of Highlights”, 75 pages.
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,357, mailed on May 26, 2011, Reztlaff, “Obtaining and Verifying Search Indices” 13 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,314, mailed on Jun. 13, 2011, Craig S. Griffin, “Display Dependent Markup Language” 26 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,682, mailed on Jun. 9, 2011, Hilliard B. Siegel, “Providing Annotations of a Digital Work” 12 pages.
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/333,215, mailed on Jul. 18, 2011, Zagorie et al., “Device-Specific Presentation Control for Electronic Book Reader Devices”, 22 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,685, John Lattyak, “Relative Progress and Event Indicators” 22 pages.
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/414,914, mailed on Aug. 4, 2011, Agarwal et al., “Questions on Highlighted Passages”, 39 pages.
Non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/537,484, mailed on Aug. 19, 2011, Thomas A. Ryan, “Expedited Acquisition of a Digital Item Following a Sample Presentation of the Item”, 13 pages.
Non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,363, mailed on Aug. 26, 2011, James R. Rezlaff II, “Search Results Generation and Sorting”, 10 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,358, mailed on Sep. 12, 2011, James R. Retzlaff II, “Managing Status of Search Index Generation”, 11 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/963,618, mailed on Sep. 26, 2011, Michael Rykov, “Dissemination of Periodical Samples”, 15 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, mailed on Sep. 27, 2011, Thomas Ryan, “Consumption of Items via a User Device”, 17 pages.
The Chinese Office Action mailed Dec. 13, 2012 for Chinese patent application No. 20078004873.9, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Pat. No. 7,865,817, 4 pages.
The Chinese Office Action mailed Dec. 14, 2012 for Chinese patent application No. 200880017589.9, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,369, 8 pages.
The Chinese Office Aciton mailed Feb. 1, 2013 for Chinese patent application No. 200880025056.5, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, 19 pages.
The Japanese Office Action mailed Dec. 17, 2012 for Japanese patent application No. 2010-509529, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, 7 pages.
The Japanese Office Action mailed Dec. 7, 2012 for Japanese patent application No. 2010-501124, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,682, 6 pages.
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/943,211, mailed on Feb. 6, 2013, Reztlaff, II et al., “Obtaining and Verifying Search Indices”, 9 pages.
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,392, mailed on Feb. 14, 2013, Ryan et al., “Administrative Tasks in a Media Consumption System”, 47 pages.
US Pat. Pub. No. 2004081300 dated Apr. 29, 2004, corresponds to Japanese Patent Application Laid-open No. 2002-259718, 14 pages.
U.S. Pat. No. 7,340,436 dated Mar. 4, 2008, corresponds to Japanese Patent Application Laid-open No. 2003-513384, 7 pages.
Final Office Action from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 12/414,914, mailed on Jan. 4, 2012, 16 pgs.
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/294,803, mailed on Feb. 21, 2013, Inventor #1, “Progress Indication for a Digital Work”, 76 pages.
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,386, mailed on Feb. 28, 2013, Ryan et al., “Handling of Subscription-Related Issues in a Media Consumption System”, 17 pages.
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/360,089, mailed on Mar. 5, 2013, Killalea et al., “Aggregation of Highlights”, 17 pages.
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,390, mailed on Apr. 8, 2013, Bajaj et al, “Providing User-Supplied Items to a User Device”, 7 pages.
Oki et al., “The Infomation Bus-An Architecture for Extensive Distributed Systems”, ACM, 1993, 11 pages.
Palm Reader Handbook, Palm Inc., 2000, 56 pages.
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, mailed on Apr. 22, 2013, Ryan et al., “Consumption of Items via a User Device”, 17 pages.
International Search Report mailed Sep. 9, 2008, in International Application No. PCT/US08/64387, filed May 21, 2008, 1 page.
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,395, mailed on May 2, 2013,Ryan et al., “Providing Supplemental Information Based on Hints in a Media Consumption System”, 12 pages.
The Chinese Office Action mailed Sep. 24, 2012 for Chinese patent application No. 200880017259.X, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,682, 5 pages.
The Japanese Office mailed Oct. 12, 2012 for Japanese patent application No. 2009-544304, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Pat. No. 7,865,817, 6 pages.
The Japanese Office Action mailed Sep. 18, 2012 for Japanese patent application No. 2007-552235, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Pat. No. 8,131,647, 4 pages.
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374 mailed on Oct. 16, 2012, Ryan et al, “Consumption of Items via a User Device”, 13 pages.
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/083,445, mailed on Oct. 5, 2012, Siegel et al., “Method and System for Providing Annotations of a Digital Work”, 29 pages.
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/360,089, mailed on Nov. 23, 2012, Killalea et al., “Aggregation of Highlights”, 15 pages.
The Chinese Office Action mailed Aug. 3, 2012 for Chinese patent application No. 200880025056.5, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, 17 pages.
Card et al., “3Book: a 3D Electronic Smart Book”, AVI'04 May 25-28, 2004, Hallipoli, Italy, ACM 2004, pp. 303-pp. 307.
The Chinese Office Action mailed Oct. 10, 2011 for Chinese patent application No. 200880017259.X, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,682, 7 pages.
The Chinese Office Action mailed Sep. 26, 2011 for Chinese patent application No. 200880017589.9, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,369, 9 pages.
The Chinese Office Action mailed Sep. 30, 2011 for Chinese patent application No. 200880025056.5, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, 9 pages.
The Japanese Office Action mailed Oct. 25, 2011 for Japanese patent application No. 2007-552235, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/039,645, 3 pages.
Mercier et al., “Sphere of influence Model in Information retrieval”, IEEE 2005 International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, pp. 120-pp. 125.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/537,484, mailed on Jan. 24, 2012, Thomas A. Ryan, “Expedited Acquisition of a Digital Item Following a Sample Presentation of the Item”, 22 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/414,914, mailed on Jan. 4, 2012, Agarwal et al., “Questions on Highlighted Passages”, 41 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,392, mailed on Oct. 14, 2011, Thomas Ryan, “Administrative Tasks in a Media Consumption System”, 38 pages.
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,390, mailed on Oct. 24, 2011, Bajaj et al., “Providing User-Supplied Items to a User Device”, 11 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/759,828, mailed on Nov. 10, 2011, James R. Retzalff II, “Search and Indexing on a User Device”, 16 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/537,518, mailed on Nov. 25, 2011, John Lattyak, “Acquisition of an Item Based on a Catalog Presentation of Items,” 8 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,386, mailed on Nov. 8, 2011, Thomas Ryan, “Handling of Subscription-Related Issues in a Media Consumption System”, 10 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,395, Thomas Ryan, “Providing Supplemental Information Based on Hints in a Media Consumption System”, 10 pages.
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,357 , mailed on Dec. 21, 2011, Reztlaff et al., “Obtaining and Verifying Search Indices”, 14 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,363, mailed on Dec. 23, 2011, James R. Rezlaff II et al., “Search Results Generation and Sorting”, 10 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,369, mailed on Dec. 29, 2011, James R. Reztlaff II et al., “Search of Multiple Content Sources on a User Device”, 21 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,685, dated Dec. 8, 2011, John Lattyak et al., “Relative Progress and Event Indicators”, 23 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, mailed on Feb. 13, 2012, Thomas Ryan et al., “Consumption of Items via a User Device”, 14 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,393, mailed on Feb. 16, 2012, John Lattyak et al., “Incremental Updates of Items”, 24 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/943,211, mailed on Jun. 6, 2012, James. R. Retzlaff II et al., “Obtaining and Verifying Search Indices”, 10 pages.
The Chinese Office Action mailed May 17, 2012 for Chinese patent application No. 20078004873.9, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Pat. No. 7,865,817, 5 pages.
The Chinese Office Action mailed May 21, 2012 for Chinese patent application No. 20088001789.9, a counterpart foreign application for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,369, pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,369 mailed on Jun. 7, 2012, James R. Reztlaff II et al., “Search of Multiple Content Sources on a User Device”, 20 pages.
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,392, mailed on Jun. 27, 2012, Ryan et al., “Administrative Tasks in a Media Consumption System”, 47 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,375, mailed on Aug. 6, 2010, 17 pgs.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,378, mailed on Oct. 15, 2009, 31 pgs.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,375, mailed on Jan. 19, 2010, 31 pgs.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,378, mailed on Mar. 16, 2010, 16 pgs.
Canadian Office Action mailed Jul. 6, 2012 for Canadian patent application No. 2594573, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Pat. No. 8,131,647, 5 pages.
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,390, mailed on Jun. 27, 2012, Bajaj et al., “Providing User-Supplied Items to a User Device”, 7 pages.
The Chinese Office Action mailed Jun. 28, 2013 for Chinese patent application No. 20078004873.9, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Pat. No. 7,865,817, 4 pages.
The Chinese Office Action mailed Jun. 6, 2013 for Chinese patent application No. 201080006308.7, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Pat. No. 8,378,979, 13 pages.
The Chinese Office Action mailed Jul. 10, 2013 for Chinese patent application No. 200880025056.5, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, 8 pages.
The European Office Action mailed Jun. 10, 2013 for European patent application No. 06718773.2, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,682, 6 pages.
Goodreads.com, “About goodreads”, 2006, 2 pages.
The Japanese Office Action mailed Apr. 12, 2013 for Japanese patent application No. 2010-501125, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,369, 5 pages.
The Japanese Office Action mailed May 24, 2013 for Japanese patent application No. 2010-501124, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,682, 7 pages.
The Japanese Office Action mailed May 31, 2013 for Japanese patent application No. 2010-509529, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, 5 pages.
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,369, mailed on May 14, 2013, Reztlaff, II et al., “Search of Multiple Content Sources on a User Device”, 24 pages.
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/294,803, mailed on Jun. 4, 2013, Lattyak et al., “Progress Indication for a Digital Work”, 26 pages.
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/759,828, mailed on Jun. 6, 2013, Reztlaff, II et al., “Search and Indexing on a User Device”, 27 pages.
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/360,089, mailed on Jul. 3, 2013, Killalea et al., “Aggregation of Highlights”, 14 pages.
Final; Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/360,089, mailed on Mar. 28, 2012, Tom Killalea et al., “Aggregation of Highlights”, 17 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/366,941, mailed on Mar. 30, 2012, Scott Dixon et al., “Bundled Digital Content”, 12 pages.
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,682, mailed on Apr. 23, 2012, Siegel et al., “Providing Annotations of a Digital Work”, 12 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,386, mailed on Apr. 26, 2012, Thomas Ryan et al., “Handling of Subscription-Related Issues in a Media Consumption System”, 14 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/083,445, mailed on May 4, 2012, Hilliard B. Siegel et al., “Method and System for Providing Annotations of a Digital Work”, 20 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,395, mailed May 9, 2012, Thomas Ryan et al., “Providing Supplemental Information Based on Hints in a Media Consumption System”, 12 pages.
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,685, mailed on Aug. 15, 2013, Lattyak et al., “Relative Progress and Event Indicators”, 24 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,395, mailed on Oct. 30, 2013, Thomas A. Ryan, “Providing Supplemental Information Based on Hints in a Media Consumption System”, 14 pages.
The Japanese Office Action mailed Aug. 23, 2013 for Japanese patent application No. 2009-544304, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Pat. No. 7,865,817, 4 pages.
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,386, mailed on Oct. 16, 2013, Ryan et al., “Handling of Subscription-Related Issues in a Media Consumption System”,18 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/943,211, mailed on Oct. 8, 2013, “Obtaining and Verifying Search Indices”, 9 pages.
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,376, mailed on Aug. 19, 2013, Kiraly et al., “Notification of a User Device to Perform an Action”, 16 pages.
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/537,484, mailed on Aug. 27, 2013, Ryan, “Expedited Acquisition of a Digital Item Following a Sample Presentation of the Item”, 13 pages.
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/414,914, mailed on Sep. 13, 2013, Agarwal et al, “Questions on Highlighted Passages”, 35 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,369, mailed on Sep. 16, 2013, James R. Reztlaff II et al., “Search of Multiple Content Sources on a User Device”, 23 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/294,803, mailed on Sep. 24, 2013, John Lattyak, “Progress Indication for a Digital Work”, 27 pages.
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/722,961, mailed on Sep. 5, 2013, Lattyak et al., “Delivery of Items for Consumption by a User Device”, 6 pages.
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/083,445, mailed Dec. 22, 2016, Siegel et al., “Method and System for Providing Annotations of a Digital Work”, 20 pages.
The European Office Action mailed Oct. 26, 2016 for European Patent Application No. 10736293.1, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 12/360,744, 9 pages.
The Extended European Search Report mailed Dec. 9, 2016 for European patent application No. 08744189.5, 7 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/537,513, filed Sep. 29, 2006 John Lattyak, “Acquisition of an item based on a Catalog Presentation of Items”.
Barnes & Noble, “Nook User Guide”, retrieved from the Internet Feb. 5, 2013, 120 pgs.
The Canadian Office Action mailed Feb. 11, 2015 for Canadian patent application No. 2681755, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,349, 4 pages.
The Canadian Office Action mailed Mar. 30, 2015 for Canadian patent application No. 2688002, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,358, 5 pages.
The Canadian Office Action mailed Nov. 4, 2105 for Canadian patent application No. 2681754, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,369, 4 pages.
The Canadian Office Action mailed Dec. 15, 2014 for Canadian patent application No. 2681754, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. No. 11/763,369, 5 pages.
The Canadian Office Action mailed May 29, 2014 for Canadian patent application No. 2684580, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, 3 pages.
The Canadian Office Action mailed Jun. 10, 2015 for Canadian patent application No. 2684580, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, 3 pages.
The Canadian Office Action mailed Jul. 31, 2015 for Canadian patent application No. 2684955, a counterpat foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,682, 4 pages.
The Canadian Office Action mailed Jul. 7, 2016 for Canadian patent application No. 2684580, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, 3 pages.
The Canadian Office Action mailed Aug. 14, 2014 for Canadian patent application No. 2684955, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,682, 3 pages.
The Canadian Office Action mailed Sep. 4, 2015 for Canadian patent application No. 2750759, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Pat. No. 8,378,979, 4 pages.
The Chinese Office Action mailed Feb. 25, 2014 for Chinese patent application No. 200880025056.5 , a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, 13 pages.
The Chinese Office Action mailed Oct. 15, 2015 for Chinese patent application No. 200880017589.9, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,369, 10 pages.
The Chinese Office Action mailed Feb. 3, 2016 for Chinese patent application No. 200880017589.9, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,369, 16 pages.
The Chinese Office Action mailed Mar. 30, 2015 for Chinese patent application No. 200880017589.9, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,369, 10 pages.
The Chinese Office Action mailed Jun. 16, 2014 for Chinese patent application No. 200880025056.5, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, 18 pages.
The Chinese Office Action mailed Jun. 5, 2014 for Chinese patent application No. 201080006308.7, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Pat. No. 8,378,979, 9 pages.
The Mintues of the Oral Proceedings mailed on Nov. 27, 2014 for European patent application No. 06718773.2, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Pat. No. 8,131,647, 13 pages.
The European Office Action mailed Dec. 12, 2009 for European Patent Application No. 06718773.2, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/039,645, 9 pages.
The European Office Action mailed Sep. 23, 2014 for European patent application No. 08732668.2, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,369, 7 pages.
The European Office Action mailed Nov. 27, 2014 for European patent application No. 06718773.2, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Pat. No. 8,131,647, 31 pages.
The European Office Action mailed Apr. 7, 2014 for European patent application No. 06718773.2, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Pat. No. 8,131,647, 7 pages.
The European Office Action mailed Jul. 27, 2016 for European patent application No. 08827356.0, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Pat. No. 8,234,282, 9 pages.
The European Office Action mailed Aug. 3, 2016 for European patent application No. 08756060.3, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, 4 pages.
The Extended European Search Report mailed Feb. 10, 2016 for European Patent Application No. 10736293.1, 15 pages.
ePaperBoard.de “Hanlin V3 Review”, retrieved on Jan. 22, 2016 at <<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=li4K5LCj54>>, Jun. 15, 2008, *the whole video*, *segment 4:50-5:10*, 1 page.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/414,914, mailed on Feb. 10, 2014, Amit D. Agarwal, “Questions on Highlighted Passages”, 40 pages.
Malloy, et al., “Google Search”, retrieved on Sep. 17, 2014 at <<http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Google—Search&oldid=118323867, Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, Mar. 27, 2007, 6 pages.
Homer, et al., “Instant HTML”, Wrox Press, 1997, pp. 76-79.
The Japanese Office Action mailed Sep. 2, 2014 for Japanese patent application No. 2011-548210, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 12/360,744, 4 pages.
The Japanese Office Action mailed Jan. 14, 2014 for Japanese patent application No. 2011-548210, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Pat. No. 8,378,979, 4 pages.
The Japanese Office Action mailed Nov. 4, 2015 for Japanese Patent Application No. 2014-245401, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,369, 9 pages.
The Japanese Office Action mailed Dec. 16, 2014 for Japanese patent application No. 2009-544304, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,677, 2 pages.
The Japanese Office Action mailed Mar. 10, 2015 for Japanese patent application No. 2010-501125, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,369, 19 pages.
The Japanese Office Action mailed Aug. 5, 2014 for Japanese patent application No. 2010-501125, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,369, 7 pages.
Kindle Community, Discussions—Screen Saver, retrieved from the Internet on Nov. 6, 2009 at <<http://www.amazon.com/tag/kindle/forum?cdForum=Fx1D7SY3BVSESG&cdThread=Tx28QGUBE29L22J>>, 4 pages.
“Kobo Wireless eReader & Desktop Application User Guide”, Feb. 2011, 170 pgs.
The Korean Office Action mailed Dec. 19, 2014 for Korean patent application No. 10-2009-7024279, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,358, 6 pages.
The Korean Office Action mailed Oct. 14, 2015 for Korean Patent Application No. 10-2011-7017613, a counterpart foreeign application of U.S. Pat. No. 3,378,979, 6 pages.
The Korean Office Action mailed Dec. 19, 2014 for Korean patent application No. 10-2009-7024280, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, 10 pages.
The Korean Office Action mailed Sep. 25, 2015 for Korean patent application No. 10-2009-7024280, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, 7 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/366,941, mailed on Jan. 6, 2015, Scott Dixon, “Bundled Digital Content”, 15 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/537,518, mailed on Jan. 9, 2015, John Lattyak, “Acquistion of an Item Based on a Catalog Presentation of Items”, 13pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/836,877, mailed on Jan. 15, 2015, Gilles Jean Roder Belin, “Cover Display”, 45 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,378, mailed on Feb. 5, 2015, John Lattyak, “Transfer of Instructions to a User Device”, 21 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/959,589, mailed on Feb. 26, 2015, Thomas A. Ryan, “Administrative Tasks in a Media Consumption System”, 45 pages.
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/959,589, mailed on Jan. 5, 2016, Ryan et al., “Administrative Tasks in a Media Consumption System”, 32 pages.
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/963,618, mailed on Jan. 6, 2016, Rykov et al., “Dissemination of Periodical Samples”, 16 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/722,961, mailed on Oct. 10, 2014, John Lattyak, “Delivery of Items for Consumption by a User Device”, 8 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/884,476, mailed on Oct. 11, 2016 John Lattyak, “Delivery of Items for Consumption by User Device”, 11 pages.
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/943,211 mailed on Oct. 16, 2015, Retzlaff II et al., “Obtaining and Verifying Search Indices”, 13 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/284,446, mailed on Oct. 31, 2014, Linsey R. Hansen “Indicators for Navigating Digital Works”, 17 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,378, mailed on Oct. 6, 2014, Lattyak et al., “Transfer of Instructions to a User Device”, 16 pgs.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,682, mailed on Oct. 7, 2014, Siegelet al., “Providing Annotations of a Digital Work”, 12 pages.
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,314 mailed on Oct. 8, 2015, Griffin et al., “Display Dependent Markup Language”, 56 pages.
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/537,518 mailed on Nov. 10, 2015, Lattyak, “Acquisition of an Item Based on a Catalog Presentation of Items”, 13 pages.
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/179,380 mailed on Nov. 5, 2015, Bajaj et al., “Providing User-Supplied items to a User Device”, 13 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/959,589, mailed on Nov. 6, 2014, Thomas A. Ryan, “Administrative Tasks in a Media Consumption System”, 29 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/179,380, mailed on Dec. 19, 2014, Girish Bansilal Bajaj, “Providing User-Supplied Items to a User Device”, 11 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/537,518, mailed on Feb. 14, 2014, John Lattyak, “Acquisition of an Item Based on a Catalog Presentation of Items”, 14 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/886,877, mailed on Feb. 21, 2014, Gilles Jean Roger Belin, “Cover Display”, 36 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/070,328, mailed on Feb. 25, 2014, Sailesh Rachabathuni, “Last Screen Rendering for Electronic Book Readers”, 11 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,314, mailed on Mar. 10, 2014, Craig S. Griffin, “Display Dependent Markup Language”, 42 pages.
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/366,941, mailed on Mar. 14, 2014, Dixon et al., “Bundled Digital Content”, 13 pages.
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/567,984, mailed on Mar. 15, 2013, Kim, “Last Screen Rendering for Electronic Book Readern”, 10 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,357, mailed on Mar. 27, 2014, James R. Retzlaff II, “Obtaining and Verifying Search Indices”, 14 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/943,211, mailed on Apr. 24, 2015, James R. Retzlaff II, “Obtaining and Verifying Search Indices”, 10 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/722,961 mailed on Apr. 25, 2014 John Lattyak, “Delivery of Items for Consumption by User Device”, 4 pages.
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/537,518, mailed on Apr. 4, 2016, Lattyak, “Acquisition of an Item Based on a Catalog Presentation of Items”, 15 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/083,445, mailed on May 12, 2016, Siegel et al., “Method and System for Providing Annotations of a Digital Work”, 34 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, mailed on May 14, 2014, Thomas A. Ryan “Consumption of Items via a User Device”, 21 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12,759,828, mailed on May 2, 2014, James R. Retzlaf II “Search and Indexing on a User Device”, 27 pages.
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/083,445 mailed on May 27, 2015, Siegel et al., “Method and System for Providing Annotations of a Digital Work”, 27 pages.
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/943,211, mailed on May 27, 2016, Retzlaff, II et al., “Obtaining and Verifying Search Indices”, 14 pages.
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,314, mailed on May 31, 2016, Griffin et al., “Display Dependent Markup Language”, 61 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/959,589, mailed on Jun. 2, 2014, Thomas A. Ryan, “Administrative Tasks in a Media Consumption System”, 24 pages.
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/284,446, mailed on Jun. 24, 2014, Hansen, “Indicators for Navigating Digital Works”, 19 pages.
Office Acton for U.S. Appl. No. 14/216,596, mailed on Jun. 26, 2015, Thomas A. Ryan “Expedited Acquistion of a Digital Item Following a Sample Presentation of the item”, 22 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,378 mailed on Jun. 3, 2015, John Lattyak, “Transfer of Instructions to a User Device”, 25 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,682, mailed on Jun. 30, 2015, Hilliard B. Siegel, “Providing Annotations of a Digital Work”, 13 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/949,115, mailed on Jun. 4, 2014, Thomas A. Ryan “Invariant Referencing in Digital Works”, 11 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/959,589, mailed on Jul. 16, 2015, Thomas A. Ryan, “Administrative Tasks in a Media Consumption System”, 47 pages.
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/943,211, mailed on Jul. 2, 2014, Retzlaff, II et al., “Obtaining and Verifying Search Indices”, 9 pages.
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/070,328, mailed on Jul. 25, 2013, Rachabathuni, “Last Screen Rendering for Electronic Book Readers”, 11 pages.
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/537,518, mailed on Jul. 31, 2015, Lattyak, “Acquisition of an Item Based on a Catalog Presentation of Items”, 6 pages.
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/959,589, mailed on Jul. 7, 2016, Ryan et al., “Adminstrative Tasks in a Media Consumption System”, 34 pages.
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/070,328, mailed on Aug. 12, 2014, Rachabathuni, “Last Screen Rendering for Electronic Book Readers”, 6 pages.
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/886,877, mailed on Aug. 13, 2014, Belin et al., “Cover Display”, 40 pages.
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,314, mailed on Aug. 28, 2014, Griffin et al., “Display Dependent Markup Language”, 52 pages.
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/179,380, mailed on Aug. 3, 2015, Bajaj et al., “Providing User-Supplied Items to a User Device”, 13 pages.
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/886,877, mailed on Sep. 11, 2013, Belin et al., “Cover Display”, 31 pages.
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/366,941 mailed on Sep. 15, 2015, Dixon et al., “Bundled Digital Content”, 18 pages.
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/083,445, mailed on Sep. 24, 2014, Siegel et al., “Method and System for Providing Annotations of a Digital Work”, 31 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/567,984, mailed on Sep. 27, 2012, John T. Kim, “Last Screen Rendering for Electronic Book Reader”, 9 pages.
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/963,618 mailed on Sep. 3, 2015, Rykov et al., “Dissemination of Periodical Samples”, 16 pages.
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/537,518, mailed on Sep. 4, 2014, Lattyak, “Acquisition of an Item Based on a Catalog Presentation of Items”, 10 pages.
“Trilogy Defintion”, Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary, Tenth Edition, 1999, 2 pages.
The Chinese Office Action mailed Jan. 6, 2014 for Chinese patent application No. 201080006308.7, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Pat. No. 8,378,979, 12 pages.
The Chinese Office Action mailed Nov. 5, 2013 for Chinese patent application No. 200880025056.5, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, 15 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/360,089, mailed on Jan. 28, 2014, Tom Killalea, “Aggregation of Highlights”, 14 pages.
The Japanese Office Action mailed Nov. 12, 2013 for Japanese patent application No. 2010-501125, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,369, 9 pages.
“Mastering to Become a True Manager, Well-selected commands for an efficient event log management, Part 1,” Windows Server World, vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 86-96, IDG Japan, Japan, Feb. 1, 2004.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/759,828, mailed on Dec. 17, 2013, James R. Retzlaff II, “Search and Indexing on a User Device”, 25 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, mailed on Dec. 24, 2013, Thomas A. Ryan, “Consumption of Items via a User Device”, 16 pages.