This invention relates to electromagnetic relays and contactors, and is more specifically related to the structure of an electromagnetic or electromechanical relay of the type that has a winding or coil that is energized to move an armature such that a load current may be applied to a load device. Relays and contactors may be considered as devices in which the appearance of a pilot current or voltage causes the opening or closing of a controlled switching device to apply or discontinue application of load current. The invention is particularly concerned with a the structure of the magnetic pole piece of the magnetic core of the winding, and the corresponding pole piece of the movable armature, structured in a way that manages the magnetic flux between core and armature as the armature closes so as to avoid noise, chatter, and wear, and to permit the relay to operate at smaller values of current for a given coil.
Electromagnetic or electromechanical relays or contactors are devices in which current that flows through an actuator coil closes or opens a pair (or multiple pairs) of electrical contacts. This may occur in a number of well-known ways, but usually a ferromagnetic armature is magnetically deflected towards the core of the coil to make (or break) the controlled circuit.
Electromagnetic or electromechanical relays are commonly used to control the application of power to a load, for example, to control the application power to a blower or fan in a ventilation, heating, or air conditioning system. These devices are inexpensive and in general have good reliability over a reasonable life span. However, due to the fact that the magnetic flux has to move across a gap that diminishes as the armature closes, the armature of the relay experiences a maximum force and acceleration at closure, which can result in a loud slapping noise, and can also produce bounce and chatter at the normally-open (NO) contact. The bounce or chatter may also produce RF switching noise, which may disturb electronic devices located near the relay.
A conventional relay is formed of a relay coil mounted on a yoke or frame of a ferromagnetic material. A core, i.e., a post formed of iron on which the coil is mounted, is affixed to the yoke, and a movable armature, also formed of ferromagnetic material, is mounted at an armature bearing, i.e., a hinge, to the yoke. The armature extends across the axis of the core of the coil, and a spring biases the armature away from the core so as to form a magnetic gap between the tip or magnetic pole face of the core and a facing surface on the armature. A conductive arm is supported on the armature and carries one or more movable contact members. In a typical relay, a normally-closed or NC movable contact is biased by the spring against a fixed normally-closed contact, and a normally-open or NO movable contact is biased by the spring away from a fixed normally-open contact.
In the conventional relay, the core pole face is a generally flat surface, and the facing portion of the armature is also a flat surface.
In order to actuate the relay, i.e., to close the normally-open contacts, current is supplied to the coil at sufficient amperage so that the magnetic force between the core pole face and the armature will overcome the spring force, and move the armature to a closed position against the core. At the initial open position, the gap is relatively large, but as the armature moves, the gap becomes smaller and smaller. For any given number of ampere-turns in the coil, the magnetic force felt by the armature will be in proportion to the inverse cube of the gap distance or separation between the armature and the core pole face. Consequently, a relatively large current is initially required to overcome the spring force and start the closure motion of the relay armature. Then at that same current, the force on the armature increases sharply as the gap distance diminishes. This results in a large acceleration just as the armature reaches the pole face of the core. The sudden collision of the armature with the core can cause the armature to bounce off, and can also cause the normally-open contacts to open and close intermittently, creating chatter and also producing arcing and RF switching noise. In addition, the relay closure can be audible, and present unpleasant clicking noises to persons present in the vicinity.
To date, no one has come up with any effective way to limit or control the magnetic forces involved with relay actuation, and no one has effectively reduced relay noise, chatter, or RF switching noise. It has been previously proposed, e.g., in Kozai et al. U.S. Pat. No. 7,932,795 and in Copper et al. U.S. Pat. No. 6,798,322 to place a cushion, pad or bump between the core pole face and the armature as a way of cushioning the closure of the armature so as to avoid audible or acoustic relay noise. However, these arrangements add to the complexity of the coil, do not level out the magnetic force on the armature, and have limited success at reducing chatter and electrical switching noise.
Accordingly, it is an object of the present invention to provide an improvement to a relay or contactor that overcomes the above-mentioned drawback(s) of the prior art.
It is a more particular object to provide an improved structure for a relay to achieve faster and quieter operation, and improved dynamics of the stroke of the armature, while employing bobbin, coil, spring, yoke and contacts that are the same or similar to those used in similar existing relays.
It is another object to provide a relay with improved geometry of the core pole face and the mating pole face of the armature to manage the magnetic flux so that initial magnetic force is increased over the conventional design at the commencement of actuation, and is reduced in respect to that of relays of conventional design at closure, so as to avoid acoustical noise, bounce, chatter, and electrical switching noise.
According to an aspect of this invention, an electromechanical relay is formed of a yoke of a ferromagnetic material, with a relay coil mounted on the yoke, and with the ferromagnetic core being affixed onto the yoke. The core protrudes through an axis of the relay coil. An armature formed of a ferromagnetic material has an armature bearing at a proximal end hinged onto the yoke. The armature extends across the axis of the core. The armature is arranged so that it is pulled in to a closed position against the core when the coil is energized. A return spring is mounted on the yoke and on the armature, and biases the armature so as to pull it to an open position when the coil is de-energized. A movable contact is mechanically carried on the armature to move between open and closed positions. A fixed contact positioned to close electrically with the movable contact when the latter is in one of its open and closed positions. The relay of this invention is improved in that the core pole face, at an axial end of the magnetic core, takes the form of a series of stepped substantially flat strips that extend generally in respective planes and successive ones of which are joined by riser surfaces that extend up or axially from the plane to the plane of the next such strip. The armature includes a corresponding armature pole face in the form of a corresponding series of stepped substantially flat strips and riser surfaces. The corresponding steps or strips of the core pole face and the armature pole face focus the magnetic flux as the edges of the stepped flat strips as the strips pass one another during closure, so that there is an initial increased magnetic force that is kept at a value to close the relay quietly, without the objectionable noise, bounce or chatter.
In a favorable embodiment, a first step of the armature pole face is positioned laterally beyond the core pole face in the direction towards the armature bearing. In the preferred embodiment, the axial height of the stepped flat strips of the core pole face increases in the direction away from the armature bearing. The armature pole face may have a flat strip that protrudes axially below an end of the core pole face on the direction towards the armature bearing. The return spring may be a leaf spring of omega profile having one leg affixed to the armature and another leg affixed to the yoke, with a generally arcuate portion arching over the armature bearing. The armature bearing may have a pair of transverse hinge members extending laterally from a proximal end of the armature. Favorably the yoke may have a pair of hinge posts, such that the hinge members fit against the hinge posts of the yoke to form the armature bearing. The hinge members have an arcuate or radiused surface facing against the respective hinge posts, such that as the armature closes it also travels longitudinally to create a wipe motion. This motion allows the corners or edges of the core pole face and of the armature pole face to be more or less aligned to focus the magnetic flux, but to keep the riser surface from colliding with each other when the armature is drawn to its closed position.
In the relay of this invention the yoke may be formed of a ferromagnetic material, with a relay coil mounted on the yoke and a ferromagnetic core affixed onto the yoke and protruding through the axis of the coil. An armature formed of a ferromagnetic material has an armature bearing formed at one end and is hinged onto the yoke, with the armature extending across the axis of the core, and arranged so to be pulled in to a closed position against the core when the coil is energized. A return spring is mounted onto the yoke and the armature and is biased to pull the armature to an open position when the coil is de-energized. One or more movable contacts may be mechanically carried on the armature to move between open and closed positions, with at least one fixed contact being positioned to close electrically with the movable contact when the latter is in one of its open and closed positions. In the relay of this invention, the core and the armature have corresponding respective pole faces with mating zig-zag profiles, considered in the longitudinal direction of the armature, i.e., transverse to the axis of the armature bearing. These zig-zag profiled pole faces define stepped successive transverse and axial surfaces that meet at corners. The magnetic flux between the core pole face and armature pole face is concentrated at successive corners of the mating zig-zag profiles as the armature moves from its open position to its closed position.
Favorably, the armature is in the form of a plate of a ferromagnetic metal having a proximal end at which are formed transverse hinge members that fit against hinge posts of the yoke to form the armature bearing. A series of steps that extend transversely across the armature plate constitute the armature pole face. Corresponding with the series of steps, the armature is of progressively reduced thickness from proximal to the distal, and the steps have radiused edges or corners.
Favorably also, the hinge members that form the armature bearing have an arcuate surface facing the respective hinge posts, so that as the armature closes it also travels laterally to create a wipe motion. This motion also moves the armature pole face in the proximal direction so that the vertical surface of the structured pole faces do not touch one another as the armature closes.
In any electro-mechanical relay or contactor, the magnetic force field exists in the air gap between the armature pole and the core pole. The field strength is proportional to the area of the poles at the gap, and decreases rapidly as the air gap increases. The structure of the armature and core pole faces is such as to “trick” the air gap. This occurs because over the full distance or stroke of the armature, the stair-step configuration of the pole faces provides a number of different points where the air gap is smaller than the distance that the armature has to travel to closure. In the embodiment described below, there are four such points where the corners or edges of the stair-steps face each other to focus the magnetic flux. The strongest flux is generated at the edges of the steps, because there is a smaller air gap there between the armature and core pole faces. This focused flux increases the total force applied on the armature at the initial, or open position, for a given number of ampere-turns. This stronger force will break the normally-closed contact as the armature engages in an earlier movement as compared with a standard design relay. This means there is more acceleration at the time when current first starts flowing in the relay coil, causing the relay to have a faster closing time. We have found the actual closing time of the relay of this inventive design to be twice as fast as a conventional relay that has the same coil and same gap length or stroke. Viewed in another way, this also means that the relay will function well with a reduced actuation current. Alternatively, the relay coil can be made with a smaller number of turns, or with finer wire for the same performance as with the existing relay, but requiring less copper.
The above and many other objects, features, and advantages of the improved relay (or contactor) of his invention will become apparent from the ensuing detailed description of a preferred embodiment, considered in connection with the accompanying Drawing.
With reference to the Drawing, and initially to
A spring 30, here in the form of an omega-shaped leaf spring, is affixed onto the yoke 20 and onto the outer surface of the armature 22, and has an arcuate center portion that arches over the armature bearing 24. The spring 30 urges the armature 22 upwards, or axially away from the coil 12. In other possible embodiments, the spring can take on other forms.
As also shown, a movable contact 32 (or contacts) is supported on the distal end of the armature 22, and faces a normally closed contact 34 and a normally open contact 36, at the beginning and end of the armature stroke positions, respectively.
In the relay 10 of the present invention, the pole face 18 of the relay coil core 16 and a corresponding relay face 38 of the armature 22 have mutually interacting stair-step or zig-zag configurations, which increases the initial closing force on actuation, and moderates the closing force as the gap width decreases.
The shape and configuration of the magnetic core 16 of this embodiment can be explained by consideration of
The stair-step configuration of the pole face 38 of the armature 22 of this embodiment is illustrated in
Also shown in
The magnetic flux-focusing or flux-concentrating effect in the relay of this invention can be explained with reference to
The prior-art relay of
As illustrated in
When the relay coil 12 is energized and the armature 22 begins to move, the action of the curved faces 80 of the hinge members 28 against the flat surfaces of the yoke posts 26 causes the armature 22 to move distally, in the direction towards the armature bearing 24. This moves the vertical surfaces 40 and 70 out of vertical alignment with one another so that they will not contact each other. At the same time, this brings the next set of corners, formed by the stair-step surfaces 50 and 44 and surfaces 62 and 72 vertically one above the other, which focuses the magnetic flux at the small gap formed between those two corners or edges. At the same time, the vertical surfaces or risers 40 and 70 face one another across a gap that is parallel to the axis of the core. The flux across that gap does not contribute to the acceleration of the armature 22. At each increment of movement of the armature towards is closed or no-gap position, the successive sets of edges or corners of the armature pole face 38 and the core pole face 18 align with one another to continue the controlled or managed concentration of magnetic flux. That is, as the armature moves towards the core, the successive corresponding edges of the stair-step structure are positioned so as to concentrate the magnetic flux as the relay closes.
A comparison of force-to-gap characteristics of the prior art relay (e.g.,
Initially, for the same applied current and the same number of winding turns, the stair-step structure of the pole faces 18 and 38 of this embodiment creates a significantly greater magnetic force than does the relay of the prior art, to with, 163 units versus 117 units. This means a significantly smaller current would be required to overcome the spring force to start moving the armature. Stated otherwise, the armature 22 of the embodiments of this invention commences motion earlier than does the armature 22′ of the prior art relay. The stair-step configuration of the pole faces 18 and 38 ensures that the magnetic flux is properly managed, that is, the magnetic force remains higher in the relay of this invention than in the prior art relay, until the armature has moved to near its closed position. As shown in
The relay of this invention is not to be limited only to the specific embodiment illustrated here. The core faces could have somewhat different geometry with different arrangements of zig-zag or stair-step pole faces, with more or fewer edges or corners, but designed to manage the magnetic flux so as to achieved the improved characteristics such as reduced noise and chatter, and better RF characteristics. The illustrated embodiment is a simple single-pole, double-throw relay with a single movable contact and a pair of fixed contacts, namely the usual NO and NC contacts. However, the principles of this invention can also be readily applied to multiple-pole relays, to specialized relays such as so-called contactors, and can be used in both AC and DC relays.
While the invention has been described with reference to a preferred embodiment, the invention is not limited only to that embodiment, but should be considered to cover many other possible variations thereof without departing from the scope and spirit of this invention, as defined in the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3775715 | Bosch et al. | Nov 1973 | A |
4238699 | Seilly | Dec 1980 | A |
5155458 | Gamble | Oct 1992 | A |
5260677 | Gamble | Nov 1993 | A |
5548259 | Ide et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5638041 | Beyer et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
6441707 | Swartzentruber et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6737946 | Seale et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6798322 | Copper et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6827331 | Roos | Dec 2004 | B1 |
7626288 | Protze | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7750772 | Hagen et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7932795 | Kozai et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8212636 | Fujimoto et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
20080136266 | Protze | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20100225428 | Fujimoto et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |