A number of sports or recreational activities require the attachment of a user's body part (frequently a foot) to a piece of equipment via a binding in order to allow the user to control the equipment. For example, snow skiing, snowboarding, waterskiing, wakeboarding, and the like all generally employ a binding that attaches a skier's foot (or shoe/boot) to a board or ski. However, unlike many other attachment mechanisms that are designed to detach (or release) only in response to one or more specific user inputs (pressing a button, moving the object in a certain way, etc.), ski bindings typically are designed to release in response to an external stressor e.g., in the event of a fall so as to avoid or reduce significant injury. However, mechanisms to facilitate this “stress-based” release, can be challenging to design, as the force and stresses placed on the binding during normal use can be quite significant and an unexpected/undesired release during normal activity can also result in significant injury. Because stress-based releases typically come from unexpected and unpredictable angles, it is almost always desirable for the binding system to enable release in virtually any direction. Moreover, different users with different skill sets, levels of experience, or desired activities may have significantly different desired tolerance levels for the factors such as the force or torque that are required to trigger a stress-based release. (Consider for example, the varied release tolerances of a beginning or recreational water-skier, a beginning or recreational snow skier/boarder, a professional slalom skier (water or snow), a downhill racer, a mogul skier, or an aerialist.) Furthermore, for obvious reasons that tend to be consistent across a variety of sports equipment, is it generally desirable for the binding to be lightweight and have a low or small profile on the ski. However most current binding systems suffer from some combination of: limited degrees of freedom of releasability, excess weight, or contact distance between boot and ski. Accordingly, there is a need for a binding system that addresses each of these concerns.
Accordingly, there is a great need for lightweight, low profile bindings that have easily adjustable tolerances and which enable release in virtually any number of incremental rotations and directions.
The present disclosure provides a mechanism for releasably attaching a first object to a second object. According to various embodiments, the attachment mechanism enables release in a wide array of incremental directions and rotations. Moreover, various embodiments provide an attachment mechanism which enables the user to select a release threshold wherein only a force or torque applied above this threshold results in release. The mechanism may also include a user-operated release mechanism that may or may not be subject to the threshold force or torque requirements. As a specific example, the mechanism may be employed in a binding system that releasably attaches a boot or other wearable article to a ski or other piece of sports equipment.
In general, the present disclosure provides a mechanism for releasably attaching a first object to a second object. According to various embodiments, the attachment mechanism enables release in a wide array of incremental directions and rotations. Moreover, various embodiments provide an attachment mechanism which enables the user to select a release threshold wherein only a force or torque applied above this threshold results in release. Of course, the mechanism may also include a user-operated release mechanism that may or may not be subject to the threshold force or torque requirements.
As a specific example, the mechanism may be employed in a binding system that releasably attaches a boot or other wearable article to a ski or other piece of sports equipment. Of course, it will be understood that while many of the specific examples are directed towards a boot/ski binding system, the mechanism itself may be applicable to a wide variety of applications wherein it is desirable for a second object to be able to release in a variety of rotational directions from a first object only after application of a pre-determined, and perhaps user-defined amount of force. While perhaps most easily understood in the context of ski bindings, such applications are not necessarily limited to sports equipment, but may include for example, prosthetics, safety riggings, and other applications where there is a desire for a range of release direction options and a preferred failure point.
According to some embodiments the binding described herein may attach a wearable object to another object. For the purposes of the present disclosure a wearable object may be any object which is normally worn, mounted, or otherwise attached to a body (including both humans and animals) including, for example, without limitations, shoes, boots, helmets, harnesses, saddles, wrappings, etc. Because the present mechanism can perhaps most easily be understood in the context of skiing, the present disclosure, for the purposes of simplicity will refer to a “binding” that attaches a “skier's” “boot” to a “ski.” However, it should be understood that the disclosure and invention should not be considered to be limited to only those objects. Accordingly, the as described attachment system can easily be used to attach any first object to any second object. Moreover, it will be understood that the user may not necessarily be engaged in the act of skiing and thus may not actually be a “skier.”
Because the present disclosure relies heavily on an understanding of how and when the binding releases as well as a unique sphere in cylinder design, understanding of the invention will be greatly enhanced by a general discussion of the nomenclature that is used herein to describe directions of translation and incremental rotations. There are three orthogonal directions (in three dimensions) and we name them relative to the ski as follows:
X: The positive X direction points toward the skier's right, when the skier is facing the tip of the ski.
Y: The positive Y direction points toward the ski's tip.
Z: The positive Z direction points upward, normal to the plane of the ski.
There are also three orthogonal rotations in three dimensions, and there are many ways to characterize them, including the order in which they are applied or, equivalently, whether the rotation planes are attached to the world or the body. However, for this context we do not need that level of exactness, and we just need to name the rotations for reference.
In addition, the present disclosure refers to “incremental rotations.” In mathematics, this is called a Lie Algebra, and in three dimensions there are six such rotations—in each rotation plane, we also differentiate by the direction of incremental rotation. We choose to name rotations according to the axis they rotate around, and use a right-handed nomenclature: if your right thumb is pointed down the axis, then your fingers curl in the direction of positive rotation. As a short-hand, we denote “positive-direction rotation around the X axis” as simply “+X rotation.” Corresponding methodology is applied for the intended meanings of −X rotation, +Y rotation, −Y rotation, +Z rotation, and −Z rotation.
According to a first embodiment, the binding system disclosed herein is comprised of two components, a mount, which is affixed to or integrated with the ski and an insert which is affixed to or integrated with the boot.
As best seen in
Returning to simultaneous viewing of
As stated above, the binding system comprises both the mount and an insert.
Directing attention towards the toe end half of the undersole, seated within and, under some conditions, extending out of, front pin channel 60 (shown only in
In the depicted embodiment, a rear tension controlled release mechanism includes the same elements at the heel end of the undersole. Namely, a rear pin 72 sits within and, under some conditions, extends out of a rear pin channel (not shown). A rear tension spring 74 is seated within the rear pin channel. Seated within rear dial hole 76 is rear dialmate 78 and rear tension dial 80.
Whether in the front or rear of the binding, the tension controlled release mechanisms operate in substantially the same way. That is, the tension spring is operably connected to the dialmate and tension dial, which acts as a cam, and rotation of the tension dial either slightly extends or compresses the spring so as to increase or decrease the force required to displace the pin within its corresponding socket, thus allowing the user to make the binding “tighter” or “looser” according to his or her desired setting. It should be noted that the depicted embodiment enables the user to independently set the binding ‘tightness” at the toe and heel ends of the binding. Of course, those of skill in the art will understand that there is a wide variety of tension control mechanisms that could be used in the present mechanism and that such mechanisms may or may not be controlled using the cam/dial system depicted. In general, in embodiments which employ the pin in socket configuration described herein, the tension control mechanism should control the amount of force required to displace the pin within the socket.
According to some embodiments, the insert can be mounted to the bottom of a boot, as shown in
In order to discuss how the binding release mechanism operates, greater attention must first be paid to the above-mentioned concave and convex curvatures of the various engagement surfaces. As stated above, one desired attribute of ski bindings is the ability to release the boot from the ski in a variety of directions while still allowing the binding to be maintained under the skier's foot. Moreover, an ideal binding would allow for a release in any incremental rotation and any combination thereof. Accordingly, one embodiment of the present disclosure employs a “sphere inside a cylinder” configuration wherein the two mount bodies and the insert all share a radius. In the context of these nested components, it will be understood that the term “share a radius” should be interpreted as meaning that the components that “share a radius” have radial edges that enabling nesting of one component within the other. Accordingly, it will be understood that the actual radius of the component that is nested within the other component is marginally smaller. Moreover, it should also be understood that the phrase “share a radius” does not necessarily require the presence of physical structure for the entire circumference of the shared radius, as this would essentially require a circular insert surrounded entirely by a mount, but rather that where the components are adjacent to each other, at least a portion of the adjacent surfaces have nested radial edges, as shown in the embodiments in the various Figures. (Of course, while not depicted, an embodiment with a circular insert is possible and contemplated by the present disclosure.)
Turning now to
Further understanding of the release mechanism will now be aided by discussion of exemplary pin and socket geometries which facilitate operation of the herein described ski binding. For the purposes of discussion, the term “normal operation” is intended to mean those conditions when the skier wants the boot to remain attached to the ski—i.e. during normal skiing. The term “release event” is intended to mean those conditions during which a skier wants the boot to detach from the ski, for example at impact during a fall and thus an event which results in sufficient torque or force being placed on the binding to overcome the user-set tension setting which secures the boot to the ski. It will be understood of course, that different skiers will have different tolerances to conditions (a new skier may want the ski to release with nearly any type of torque or impact while a professional slalom skier would likely expect (and want) a substantial amount of torque to be placed on the skis during normal operation and thus would only want the ski to release in response to a high or very high degree of torque or force). Accordingly, the above-described tensioning system enables the individual skier to set the amount of force that is required to differentiate between what they would consider to be normal operations and a release event, and to change this setting as they see fit. Of course it will be understood that the present binding system could be provided with a single fixed tension setting (whether or not this fixed tension setting is initially dictated by the user) and that such embodiments are contemplated by the present disclosure.
According to various embodiments, when the binding is secured for normal operation, each pin is forced into a corresponding socket by a tensioner, such as a spring. Moreover, the pin, pin channel, and corresponding sockets are designed such that when in the locked position, a shear force, acting in any direction between the mount bodies and the sole, creates a force toward the center along the pin channel. Under normal operation, the force of the compressed spring is greater than the shear force, so the pin does not retract and the side walls of the socket prevent the pin from moving. However, when a translated shear force exceeds the force provided by the spring (for example due to impact during a fall), the pin begins to retract and/or move laterally within the socket. This lateral motion is translated to the insert, leading to release of the pin from the socket and a corresponding release of the insert from the mount bodies. (Of course it will be understood that the direction of shear force and corresponding pin movement and eventual release can occur within in any rotational or translational directions thus the reference to “lateral” movement is not limited to simply movement in the Z-plane, but includes any of the possible coordinates in the in the releasability hemisphere.)
However, according to some embodiments, it may be desirable to maximize the differential between the holding force under normal operation and holding force during a release event. Put another way, it may be desirable to ensure the binding is secure as possible (and thus won't release) during normal operation, but that release is as fast and easy as possible during a release event. Accordingly, in these embodiments, a pin and socket geometry that increases the holding force during displacement may be less desirable.
Accordingly, the present disclosure provides alternate channel geometries wherein the steepest tangent angle of lateral contact surfaces between the pin and socket occurs when the pin is in the locked position within the socket, and the tangent angle of contact surfaces decreases when/as the pin is displaced, ensuring that displacement of the pin does not increase and in some cases actually decreases, the holding force.
An alternative socket geometry, referred to herein as a “vortex socket” is depicted in
It is noted that according to various embodiments, the sockets are entirely passive (i.e. include no moving parts) and, in fact, as depicted, the entire mount can easily be manufactured to include no moving parts. In these embodiments, any moving parts are contained within the insert. Accordingly, in embodiments wherein the mount is attached to the ski and the insert is attached to (or an integrated component of) the boot, the components attached to the ski can be small and light weight, reducing the weight of the ski, which may be significant when skis are carried. Small components on the ski also allows maximum contact surface of the boot to the ski in applications where the feet need to be close together and thus some or all of the mount lies underneath the boot, such as on a slalom water ski.
Of course while the depicted embodiments have shown only a single pin and socket tension controlled release mechanism at each end of the insert, it will be understood that any number of tension controlled release mechanisms may be used, as space and need dictate or allow. It will be understood that some embodiments of the presently described binding may be better situated for 2, 3, 4, 5, or more tension controlled release mechanisms. For example, mono-skis, sit-skis and other adaptive equipment may require a larger ski and/or greater area of contact between the equipment that is strapped (or otherwise connected) to the skier and the ski. In this case, it may be preferable to increase the number of tension controlled release mechanisms to create a suitable binding.
When multiple pins extend out of the same end of the boot or undersole, special asymmetric head geometries may be used. Most of the same considerations that relate to a single pin (per end) still apply. In addition, the individual pins may be asymmetric to the left and right of their long axis, but the pins may be approximately symmetric to each other about the YZ plane. For example, if the inward-facing surfaces are steeper than the outward-facing surfaces, then when a pin enters a socket that is not the intended or correct socket, it will both not penetrate deeply and be depressed fully flush with relatively little around Z torque. This helps to prevent a pin from sticking in an incorrect socket, either when entering the system or during a Z-rotation release.
Of course it will be understood that the radial arrangement of the pins as depicted in
It will be appreciated that some multi-pin embodiments, such as the radial arrangement described above, prevent a pin from inadvertently entering the wrong hole and misaligning the releasable undersole relative to the mount bodies. Another option to prevent inadvertent mismatching is to choose pin/socket cross-sections that do not allow a pin to enter to a non-matching socket. For example, a square pin and a round pin, with appropriate sizes, will not fit into each other's sockets. Of course it will be appreciated that many other non-matching cross-sections are possible.
A variation on the non-matching cross-sections is to mount the bodies of the pins at different out-of-plane angles. This type of pin geometry is shown in
It should be noted that while many of the depicted embodiments show the sliding axis of the pin to be aligned radially, this is not a requirement. Moreover, it will be understood that various combinations of any of the above geometries are also possible. As a non-limiting example, a particular binding may employ the single pin geometry shown in
Of course it will be understood that the direction that each pin protrudes does not need to be generally away from the foot, but can be toward the interior instead. In this case, the geometric analogy of the socket and sole may be swapped: the socket where it connects to the pin is cut from a sphere, and the sole where the pin exits is cut from a cylinder. Moreover, in an embodiment where all of the pins point inward and approximately radially, a single shared mount piece that has sockets for each of the pins could be employed. As an example, this mount piece might have a circular cross-section and be cut from a sphere, and placed near the center of the skier's foot, while the insert may comprise one or two portions cut from the sphere's surrounding cylinder, positioned to both receive and position the shared mount piece.
Note that, in practice, a thin part that is cut by a sphere is almost indistinguishable from one cut from a cylinder, because the cosine of a small angle is nearly 1.0. Therefore, various alternative embodiments could employ any combination sphere- or cylinder-derived segments or subsets thereof.
As stated above, the sphere in cylinder geometry of the presently described binding enables infinitely incremental releases throughout an entire releasability hemisphere. These releases are demonstrated in
It should be noted that when in the locked position, the circle in cylinder geometry has the added feature of providing a nearly seamless contact surface for the skier's boot/foot. For maximum performance and control, it is typically desirable to have as much contact as possible both between the insert and the mount and between the skier's boot and the ski. As shown, the concave curvature of each mount body (28, 30) matches the convex curvature of the toe and heel ends of the insert, so that the engagement surfaces of the mount bodies are smoothly aligned with the engagement surfaces of the insert with minimal gapping between the components. This provides the skier with a smooth, comfortable, and solid feeling footing as well as maximum control as the skier's movements are easily and directly translated to the ski.
Of course it should be realized that any angle which enables release, can also be employed in the reverse for engagement. Accordingly, the same rotations (but in the opposite direction) shown in
As a whole,
According to various embodiments, it may be desirable for the skier to be able to adjust the binding relative to the ski without actually redrilling holes or reattaching the mount and without changing any of the release characteristics of the binding. To accommodate this, the holes in the mount plate through which the bolts attach to ski, can be slotted in the Y direction. When the mount bolts are loose, this allows the plate to move in Y.
According to some embodiments, a subset of these slotted holes can have teeth placed on either or both sides of the slot, in any combination of embedded in or protruding out from the mount plate. In this configuration, each tooth could run along the X axis a short distance. According to this embodiment, a matching, separate bolt holder could also be provided, which also has matching teeth. The teeth may be any reasonable periodic pattern, such as triangle wave (aka saw tooth), sinusoid, or alternating half-circles. The teeth would allow a relatively fine selectin of Y position for the boot. But when the teeth are engaged and the bolt is tight, it becomes almost impossible for the mounted system to move in the Y direction. This assures the mount remains where it was intended to be.
As a further embodiment, teeth that are 180° out of phase with each other can be placed on either side of a slot. The bolt holder could also have this paired-out-of-phase pattern. This would allow the bolt to be positioned with a resolution of half the spacing of the teeth, by choosing whether to take the odd or even positions by rotating the bolt holder 180 degrees.
Alternatively or additionally, it may be desirable for the sole of the boot to be positioned on the ski rotated around the linear axis. For example, in some of the relevant disciplines, notably slalom-waterskiing, wakeboarding, and snowboarding, it is often desirable to adjust the Z-rotation (sometimes called pivot) of the mounted position of a boot. To facilitate that, the mount is rotated in the plane of the ski. Note that the axis of this rotation is not necessarily the center of the virtual sphere and cylinder of the release mechanism. Further note that this rotation has no impact on the mounting or release characteristics, because the inserts will be rotated to match when installed.
To produce a rotatable mount (i.e. one wherein the specific Z-rotation of the mounts can be selected by the skier), arced slots that all share the same axis of rotation can be used. If a mount plate is used, the holes for the mount plate can be slotted. Alternatively, whether or not a mount plate is used, the bolt holes in the mount bodies could be slotted.
In either case, teeth can be used in a manner similar to that described above, except that the teeth are in a radial pattern—i.e. the teeth all run toward the shared center. As before, the teeth may be embedded in and/or raised above the mount plate, and their radial profile may be any reasonable periodic function. Matching teeth are then cut in the bottom of each socket. Note that these socket pieces do not necessarily have identical tooth patterns to each other, due to the release center being different from the mount-rotation center.
Moreover, it should be noted that in an activity like snowboarding, where both feet are attached to the same board, this embodiment would easily enable the skier to specifically and separately adjust the specific Z-rotation angle for each foot.
Alternatively or additionally, it may be desirable for the sole of the boot to be non-coplanar with the ski. For example, it may be desired to set the boot with an X rotation (sometimes called pitch) or with a Y rotation (sometimes called cant). For small amounts of such rotations, a wedge plate placed underneath the mount plate suffices, with mount holes matching the mount plate. To allow some choice of the rotations, plates of various angles can be provided, and then stacked. For example, a 2-degree X rotation plate and a 1-degree Y rotation plate could both be placed under the mount plate. Again, this has the advantage of making no change to the release characteristics. If a larger amount of X or Y rotation is desired, then a version of the mount plate may be used that is shaped like a wedge but has holes oriented in the Z direction. Alternatively, material inside the boot can create the desired orientation of shin to ski.
Finally, while substantial attention has been paid to release of the boot from the ski due to shear force (i.e. in the event of a crash), it is understood that it may be desirable for the skier to release the boot from the ski voluntarily—for example, when a run has ended. According to a first embodiment, to voluntarily detach the skier's foot from the ski, the skier can simply loosen the boot (e.g. buckles or laces) and remove his or her foot from the boot. In this case, no actual voluntary release mechanism is integrated into the system. This is quite suitable and often employed for water sport bindings, but may not be desirable for snow sports.
Accordingly, some embodiments may include a voluntary release mechanism. An exemplary mechanism might be or include an integrated lever that forces release. For example, a longer lever outside the sole could be attached via an axis inside the sole, to a shorter lever. This creates the mechanical advantage to force the mechanism to release with a relatively small force on the external lever. Alternatively, the mechanism could include a similar lever that either pushes on the pin or de-tensions the tensioner, allowing the boot to be easily released with a slight lift.
Under no circumstances may the patent be interpreted to be limited to the specific examples or embodiments or methods specifically disclosed herein. Under no circumstances may the patent be interpreted to be limited by any statement made by any Examiner or any other official or employee of the Patent and Trademark Office unless such statement is specifically and without qualification or reservation expressly adopted in a responsive writing by Applicants.
The terms and expressions that have been employed are used as terms of description and not of limitation, and there is no intent in the use of such terms and expressions to exclude any equivalent of the features shown and described or portions thereof, but it is recognized that various modifications are possible within the scope of the invention as claimed. Thus, it will be understood that although the present invention has been specifically disclosed by preferred embodiments and optional features, modification and variation of the concepts herein disclosed may be resorted to by those skilled in the art, and that such modifications and variations are considered to be within the scope of this invention as defined by the appended claims.
The following application claims benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Nos. 62/299,251, filed Feb. 24, 2016 and 62/364,534, filed Jul. 20, 2016, each of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5947488 | Gorza | Sep 1999 | A |
8376390 | Neiley | Feb 2013 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170239554 A1 | Aug 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62299251 | Feb 2016 | US | |
62364534 | Jul 2016 | US |