The present invention relates to increasing the efficiency of querying database data by moving or copying derived caches, that are derived from the database data, during data rebalance.
At times, it is useful for a database management system (DBMS) to generate and maintain data that is derived from database data, such as metadata that describes particular portions of tables stored within a database, data that is stored in a different format than the database data, etc. For example, for each one megabyte (MB) of a given table in a database, the DBMS that manages the database derives metadata that indicates particular aspects of the data in that one MB, e.g., the max and min values for a given column in the table. This metadata is computed as data loads and updates and is also computed as the DBMS scans the table in connection with responding to queries over the table. The DBMS stores, e.g., in main memory, this derived metadata as a data summary in a “derived cache” that is associated with the database data from which the data summary is derived.
The DBMS utilizes derived caches associated with a particular table to speed up processing of queries that run over the table. In the context of a data summary that includes min and max data for a particular column of a table, the DBMS uses the min and max data from the data summary to determine whether the portion of the table associated with the min and max data includes information that is required by the query.
For example, a particular query selects rows from a table T that includes a column A, where the value of column A is less than five. During execution of this query, the DBMS determines, from a derived metadata summary stored for a particular portion of table T, that the min value of column A within that portion of the table is 10. As such, none of the rows within the portion of table T associated with this derived cache are selected by the query, and the DBMS need not scan the rows in that portion of table T in order to execute the query. In this way, the DBMS uses a derived cache to prune input/output (I/O) operations from the query execution, specifically, I/O operations on the portion of table T that is associated with the derived cache.
Since I/O operations are relatively costly operations, the ability to prune I/O operations from query execution increases the efficiency of executing queries that involve values summarized in derived caches. Likewise, other types of derived caches speed up execution of operations over database data and, as such, increase the efficiency of the DBMS.
Generally, derived cache data is built based on queries and other operations (such as data loads and updates) that have been run over a particular instance of data, i.e., from which the derived cache is derived. As such, data that has been newly replicated or relocated does not have the benefit of derived cache data to increase the efficiency of operations over the data. It would be beneficial to make derived cache data, that is derived based on other instances of particular data, available to the DBMS in connection with other, newer, replicas of the particular data.
The approaches described in this section are approaches that could be pursued, but not necessarily approaches that have been previously conceived or pursued. Therefore, unless otherwise indicated, it should not be assumed that any of the approaches described in this section qualify as prior art merely by virtue of their inclusion in this section.
In the drawings:
In the following description, for the purposes of explanation, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. It will be apparent, however, that the present invention may be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, well-known structures and devices are shown in block diagram form in order to avoid unnecessarily obscuring the present invention.
Derived caches (e.g., Storage Indexes or data summaries, Columnar Cache, etc.) are caches of data that are derived from persistently-stored database data. A DBMS can use a derived cache to speed up application processing over the database data.
According to embodiments, a derived cache that is derived from a first instance of particular data is used to speed up queries and other operations over a second instance of the particular data. Traditionally, a DBMS generates and uses derived cache data only for the database data from which the derived data was derived. However, according to embodiments, derived cache data associated with a first instance of database data is relocated to the location of a second, newly created, instance of the database data. Since the derived cache data is derived from an identical copy of the database data, the cache data derived for the first instance can successfully be used to speed up applications running over the second instance of the database data.
Derived Caches
A derived cache is composed of data that is derived from persistent data, such as database data. Unlike cache data comprising a reproduction of one or more portions of persistent data, which is stored in a cache in order to speed up access to the information stored on disk, derived data (in a derived cache) comprises metadata describing associated persistent data (such as Storage Indexes or data summaries), or comprises information from persistent data that is in a different format than the format of associated persistent data (such as Columnar Cache).
A Storage Index is a type of derived cache that stores data summaries, which comprise metadata (such as min and max values of particular columns, whether given columns include null values, etc.) about an associated portion of database data. To illustrate, a particular Storage Index associated with a given portion of database data indicates the min and max values of a particular column within a table represented within the associated portion of database data.
According to one or more embodiments, Storage Indexes (and other types of derived cache), are stored in main memory of a storage system host that also persistently stores associated persistent data. (For more information about Storage Indexes, see “Smart Scans Meet Storage Indexes”, by Arup Nanda, published in Oracle Magazine, May/June 2011, the entire contents of which are incorporated by reference hereby as if fully set forth herein.)
Another example of a derived cache represents associated persistent data in a different format than the format in which the persistent data is stored on disk. For example, a Columnar Cache is a derived cache that stores, in a column-based format, data that is stored on disk in a row-based format.
According to embodiments, Columnar Cache is stored in volatile memory, on persistent storage, and/or in a flash memory, such as the flash cache of an Exadata system. (See “A Technical Overview of the Oracle Exadata Database Machine and Exadata Storage Server”, An Oracle White Paper, June 2012, found at the time of writing this document as “exadata-technical-whitepaper-134575.pdf” at http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/database/exadata/. The entire contents of this document is incorporated by reference hereby as if fully set forth herein.)
According to one or more embodiments, each derived cache is associated with a discrete portion of persistently-stored data. A portion of data is a unit of allocation within storage system hosts (or “cells”) of a storage system, where each unit of allocation is comprised of a certain amount of data, such as 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, or 64 megabytes.
A DBMS may generate derived data when data is loaded, when data is updated, and/or while the DBMS scans the associated portion of data in connection with running operations over the data. Thus, derived caches are built up over time. As the execution of operations over the data require calculation of data summaries and/or require conversion of data into a different format than the format in which the data is stored on disk, the storage server in a storage system host stores these data summaries or reformatted data into derived caches. These derived caches may then be used to speed up operations over the associated data. For example, a storage server in a storage system host determines, based on any derived cache associated with database data referred to by a particular query, whether any portion of query processing (such as data reformatting or I/O operations) may be pruned or skipped.
Creating New Replicas of Database Data
At times, derived cache data, that is developed for a first instance of particular data, can be used to speed up query processing over a second instance of the particular data. Specifically, when the second instance of data is a new replica of the particular data, derived cache data developed for another replica of the data can be used to speed up processing of operations over the new replica without waiting for independent development of derived caches for the new replica.
Storage manager instances 114 and 124 are run on server devices 110 and 120, respectively. Storage manager instances 114 and 124 are responsible for initializing cell-to-cell rebalancing among the storage system hosts (or “cells”) in storage system 140. Once cell-to-cell rebalancing is initiated among two of the cells, the storage servers on the cells take responsibility for relocating data (and derived cache) amongst the cell storage. Accordingly, storage servers 142A-N (within the cells of storage system 140) locally manage data stored within storage system 140, i.e., by performing read/write I/O, managing data cache, managing derived cache, performing smart scan, taking part in cell-to-cell rebalancing, etc. Storage system 140 includes multiple storage system hosts 140A-N, each of which represent a storage server 142 and storage 144, which includes one or more of flash memory, volatile memory, and/or one or more storage disks. Storage 144 within the cells of storage system 140 may be used to store redundant physical replicas of database data.
Storage manager instances 114 and 124 collectively implement a storage management system that manages where, within storage system 140, particular data is stored. Storage manager instances 114 and 124 provide instructions to storage servers 142A-N as to how cell-to-cell data rebalancing should be accomplished, including on what cell particular data should be stored. The storage management system also manages data redundancy, including automatically creating additional physical replicas of data when needed, e.g., when a disk failure causes a previously-established physical replica of data to become unusable.
Many times, administrator require a DBMS to store multiple copies of particular database data at all times, which reduces the likelihood of data loss. When required, the DBMS establishes (via the storage management system) the indicated number of copies of the indicated database data, i.e., within storage system 140 of
At times, when persistent data is copied or moved from one location to another (e.g., because of data rebalancing among nodes in a cluster, initiated by storage manager instance 114 or 124, etc.), derived data that is associated with the persistent data is not replicated to memory of the destination cell. Derived caches are recorded for the new replica of the database data, without benefit of derived data developed for other replicas of the data, in the new location as the replica on the destination cell is scanned for operations over the data.
However, according to one or more embodiments, derived cache data, associated with particular database data, is relocated to the destination of a new replica of the database data as depicted in flowchart 200 of
At step 202 of flowchart 200, a database is maintained on persistent storage of a storage device. For example, database server instance 112 maintains particular database data on a disk of storage 144B.
Each unit of data is uniquely identifiable, at least based on an identifier of the partition of a cell disk (which is referred to as a “grid disk”) of a storage 144 in which the unit of data is stored, and an offset into the identified grid disk. For example, unit of data 300 is from grid disk number 4 (within storage 144B) and offset 500 with a length of 1 MB, and unit of data 310 is from grid disk number 5 (within storage 144B) and offset 100 with a length of 1 MB.
At step 204, one or more derived caches are maintained in memory of the storage device, wherein a particular derived cache, of the one or more derived caches, includes information derived from a unit of data, from the database, that is stored persistently in a particular region of the persistent storage. For example, as database server instance 112 performs operations over unit of data 300, storage server 142B compile one or more data summaries of unit of data 300 and stores the one or more data summaries to a derived cache 302 within storage 144B. As a further example, storage server 142B reformat at least a portion of unit of data 300 from a row-based format to a column-based format and storage server 142B store the reformatted data to derived cache 304 within storage 144B. Derived caches 302 and 304 are, therefore, derived from data in unit of data 300 and are associated with that unit of data.
Storage servers 142A-N store derived caches, derived from a particular unit of data, based on the same unique identifier as the particular unit of data. As such, derived caches 302 and 304 are identified as the derived caches associated with the unique identifier (of unit of data 300) grid disk number 4, of storage 144B, and offset 500.
At step 206, it is determined to copy the unit of data, that is stored in the particular region of the persistent storage, to a second storage device. Copying the unit of data may be a result of data rebalancing among storage system hosts 140A-N, initiation by storage manager instance 114 or 124, etc.
For example, storage manager instance 114 detects that a disk within storage system host 140A has failed. In response to detecting the failure, storage manager instance 114 determines that a new physical replica of database data that is stored within the failed disk of storage 144A needs to be created, i.e., based on a replication policy for the data. In this example, the replication policy for the data mandates that the data be physically replicated on at least two storage cells at all times.
According to one or more embodiments, steps 208 and 210 are performed in response to determining to copy the unit of data, that is stored in the particular region of the persistent storage, to a second storage device.
At step 208, the unit of data, that is stored in the particular region of the persistent storage, is copied to a second storage device. Continuing with the previous example, before the failure of storage 144A, the replication policy was being complied with by maintaining replicas of the data on both storage system host 140A and storage system host 140B (where units of data 300 and 310 comprise at least a portion of the physical replica of the data housed on disk at storage system host 140B).
Thus, based on the replication policy, storage manager instance 114 initiates creation of a new replica of the database data on the failed disk of storage system host 140A. Storage manager instance 114 automatically identifies storage system host 140N as the destination location for the new replica. As instructed by storage manager instance 114, storage server 142B automatically begins copying the replica of the data from storage 144B to storage 144N, including copying unit of data 300 from storage 144B to storage 144N. The new replica of unit of data 300, within storage 144N, is represented in
At step 210, the particular derived cache is copied to the second storage device. For example, a storage server of a cell identifies one or more derived caches associated with a particular unit of data being copied from the storage of the cell based on the unique identifier of the unit of data. In the context of
Storage server 142N assigns derived caches 322 and 324 the same unique identifier as unit of data 320, with which the copied derived caches are associated in the cell. Specifically, according to the example above, storage server 142N causes derived caches 322 and 324 to be read out at grid disk 1 (of storage 144N) at offset 200.
According to one or more embodiments, storage manager instance 114 also instructs storage server 142B to copy unit of data 310 from storage 144B to storage 144N. The replica of unit of data 310 within storage 144N is represented as unit of data 330. In a manner similar to that described for unit of data 300 above, storage server 142B identifies derived cache 312 as being associated with unit of data 310 based on the derived cache having the same unique identifier as unit of data 310. In connection with copying unit of data 310, storage server 142B automatically copies derived cache 312 to the memory of storage 144N. In
Architecture for Replicating Derived Caches
According to one or more embodiments, one or both of server devices 110 and 120 implement a single-server database management system. According to one or more embodiments, server devices 110 and 120 are nodes in a cluster of nodes managed by a multi-node DBMS, e.g., a shared-everything cluster database environment (such as Oracle Real Application Clusters (“RAC”)). (See “Oracle Real Application Clusters (RAC)”, An Oracle White Paper, June 2013, Oracle Database 12C documentation. This document is incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein.) According to one or more embodiments, any number of nodes may be part of a node cluster managed by a multi-node DBMS. Specifically, resources from multiple nodes in a multi-node database system can be allocated to run a particular database server's software.
Server devices 110 and 120 are implemented by any type of computing device that is capable of communicating with storage system 140 and also capable of running a database server instance and a storage manager instance. In network arrangement 100, server device 110 is configured with a database server instance 112 and server device 120 is configured with a database server instance 122.
A database server instance (or “instance”) is a server that comprises a combination of the software and allocation of resources from a node. Specifically, a server, such as a database server, is a combination of integrated software components and an allocation of computational resources, such as memory, a node (i.e., a computing device), and/or processes on the node for executing the integrated software components on a processor, the combination of the software and computational resources being dedicated to performing a particular function on behalf of one or more clients.
Database server instances 112 and 122 maintain access to and manage database data in storage 144A-N within storage system 140. According to one or more embodiments, access to a given database comprises access to (a) a set of disk drives storing data for the database, and (b) data blocks stored thereon.
Storage system hosts 140A-N in storage system 140 include computer hardware components, and may further include software components. One or more storage servers 142A-N execute on storage system hosts 140A-N. Storage servers 142A-N are integrated software components and allocations of computational resources, such as memory and processes of the corresponding storage system host 140A-N. As such, storage system hosts 140A-N represent storage hardware and/or storage servers required to store database data. Storage 144A-N within storage system hosts 140A-N represent any type of storage, including one or more of volatile and non-volatile storage, e.g., random access memory (RAM), one or more hard disks, main memory, etc.
One or more of the functions attributed to processes running on server devices 110 and 120, as described herein, may be performed by services on other server devices that are communicatively coupled. Furthermore, any of the functionality attributed to database server instances 112 and 122, storage manager instances 114 and 124, and storage servers 142A-N herein may be performed by any other logical entity of network arrangement 100, according to one or more embodiments. Server devices 110 and 120 may be configured with other mechanisms, processes and functionalities, depending upon a particular implementation. Also, example network arrangement 100 may include other devices, including client devices, server devices, storage devices, networks, and display devices, according to one or more embodiments.
In an embodiment, each of the processes and/or functionality described in connection with database server instances 112 and 122, storage manager instances 114 and 124, and/or storage servers 142A-N are performed automatically and may be implemented using one or more computer programs, other software elements, and/or digital logic in any of a general-purpose computer or a special-purpose computer, while performing data retrieval, transformation, and storage operations that involve interacting with and transforming the physical state of memory of the computer.
Automatic Storage Management System
Server devices 110 and 120 are configured with database server instances 112 and 122, which are clients of storage servers 142A-N. For example, database server instances 112 and 122 send storage server requests to storage servers 142A-N.
Server devices 110 and 120 are also configured with storage manager instances 114 and 124, respectively. Storage manager instances 114 and 124 implement a storage management system for storage system hosts 140A-140N within storage system 140. One example of storage manager instances 114 and 124 is the Oracle Automatic Storage Management, which acts as a cluster volume manager and file system used to manage Oracle Exadata storage system resources. (information Oracle Automatic Storage Management is found in the “Automatic Storage Management Administrator's Guide”, in the Oracle Database Online Documentation 11 g Release 2 (11.2) documentation, found at the time of writing this document as “asmcon.htm” at “docs.oracle.com/cd/E11882_01/server.112/e18951”, the contents of which are incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein.) Alternatively, one or more techniques described herein may be practiced without any specialized storage manager instance in server devices 110 and 120.
Collectively, storage manager instances 114 and 124 and storage servers 142A-N within storage system 140 implement an automatic storage management system (ASMS) that automatically rebalances data from cell to cell, and manages the data within storage 144A-N.
According to one or more embodiments, storage system 140 is a disk group that storage manager instances 114 and 124 use to store data files for databases being managed by one or both of database server instances 112 and 122. (More information about an example storage system is found in “Oracle Grid Infrastructure for a Standalone Server”, Oracle Database Installation Guide, Oracle Database Online Documentation 11 g Release 2 (11.2), which is found at “oraclerestart.htm” in docs.oracle.com/cd/E11882_01/install.112/e47689, the entire contents of which are incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein.)
The ASMS ensures that data is stored evenly across storage system hosts 140A-N. Furthermore, the ASMS ensures that replication of the data conforms to replication requirements. Based on replication requirements, storage manager instances 114 and 124 initiates the required number of physical replicas within storage system hosts 140A-N, and, if a particular physical replica is compromised, causes automatic creation of a new replacement physical replica within storage system hosts 140A-N. Storage servers 142A-N receive instructions from storage manager instances 114 and 124 for data management tasks and storage servers 142A-N perform these tasks. As such, the data stored in storage system 140 is manipulated locally by storage servers 142A-N.
Hardware Overview
According to one embodiment, the techniques described herein are implemented by one or more special-purpose computing devices. The special-purpose computing devices may be hard-wired to perform the techniques, or may include digital electronic devices such as one or more application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs) or field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs) that are persistently programmed to perform the techniques, or may include one or more general purpose hardware processors programmed to perform the techniques pursuant to program instructions in firmware, memory, other storage, or a combination. Such special-purpose computing devices may also combine custom hard-wired logic, ASICs, or FPGAs with custom programming to accomplish the techniques. The special-purpose computing devices may be desktop computer systems, portable computer systems, handheld devices, networking devices or any other device that incorporates hard-wired and/or program logic to implement the techniques.
For example,
Computer system 400 also includes a main memory 406, such as a random access memory (RAM) or other dynamic storage device, coupled to bus 402 for storing information and instructions to be executed by processor 404. Main memory 406 also may be used for storing temporary variables or other intermediate information during execution of instructions to be executed by processor 404. Such instructions, when stored in non-transitory storage media accessible to processor 404, render computer system 400 into a special-purpose machine that is customized to perform the operations specified in the instructions.
Computer system 400 further includes a read only memory (ROM) 408 or other static storage device coupled to bus 402 for storing static information and instructions for processor 404. A storage device 410, such as a magnetic disk, optical disk, or solid-state drive is provided and coupled to bus 402 for storing information and instructions.
Computer system 400 may be coupled via bus 402 to a display 412, such as a cathode ray tube (CRT), for displaying information to a computer user. An input device 414, including alphanumeric and other keys, is coupled to bus 402 for communicating information and command selections to processor 404. Another type of user input device is cursor control 416, such as a mouse, a trackball, or cursor direction keys for communicating direction information and command selections to processor 404 and for controlling cursor movement on display 412. This input device typically has two degrees of freedom in two axes, a first axis (e.g., x) and a second axis (e.g., y), that allows the device to specify positions in a plane.
Computer system 400 may implement the techniques described herein using customized hard-wired logic, one or more ASICs or FPGAs, firmware and/or program logic which in combination with the computer system causes or programs computer system 400 to be a special-purpose machine. According to one embodiment, the techniques herein are performed by computer system 400 in response to processor 404 executing one or more sequences of one or more instructions contained in main memory 406. Such instructions may be read into main memory 406 from another storage medium, such as storage device 410. Execution of the sequences of instructions contained in main memory 406 causes processor 404 to perform the process steps described herein. In alternative embodiments, hard-wired circuitry may be used in place of or in combination with software instructions.
The term “storage media” as used herein refers to any non-transitory media that store data and/or instructions that cause a machine to operate in a specific fashion. Such storage media may comprise non-volatile media and/or volatile media. Non-volatile media includes, for example, optical disks, magnetic disks, or solid-state drives, such as storage device 410. Volatile media includes dynamic memory, such as main memory 406. Common forms of storage media include, for example, a floppy disk, a flexible disk, hard disk, solid-state drive, magnetic tape, or any other magnetic data storage medium, a CD-ROM, any other optical data storage medium, any physical medium with patterns of holes, a RAM, a PROM, and EPROM, a FLASH-EPROM, NVRAM, any other memory chip or cartridge.
Storage media is distinct from but may be used in conjunction with transmission media. Transmission media participates in transferring information between storage media. For example, transmission media includes coaxial cables, copper wire and fiber optics, including the wires that comprise bus 402. Transmission media can also take the form of acoustic or light waves, such as those generated during radio-wave and infra-red data communications.
Various forms of media may be involved in carrying one or more sequences of one or more instructions to processor 404 for execution. For example, the instructions may initially be carried on a magnetic disk or solid-state drive of a remote computer. The remote computer can load the instructions into its dynamic memory and send the instructions over a telephone line using a modem. A modem local to computer system 400 can receive the data on the telephone line and use an infra-red transmitter to convert the data to an infra-red signal. An infra-red detector can receive the data carried in the infra-red signal and appropriate circuitry can place the data on bus 402. Bus 402 carries the data to main memory 406, from which processor 404 retrieves and executes the instructions. The instructions received by main memory 406 may optionally be stored on storage device 410 either before or after execution by processor 404.
Computer system 400 also includes a communication interface 418 coupled to bus 402. Communication interface 418 provides a two-way data communication coupling to a network link 420 that is connected to a local network 422. For example, communication interface 418 may be an integrated services digital network (ISDN) card, cable modem, satellite modem, or a modem to provide a data communication connection to a corresponding type of telephone line. As another example, communication interface 418 may be a local area network (LAN) card to provide a data communication connection to a compatible LAN. Wireless links may also be implemented. In any such implementation, communication interface 418 sends and receives electrical, electromagnetic or optical signals that carry digital data streams representing various types of information.
Network link 420 typically provides data communication through one or more networks to other data devices. For example, network link 420 may provide a connection through local network 422 to a host computer 424 or to data equipment operated by an Internet Service Provider (ISP) 426. ISP 426 in turn provides data communication services through the world wide packet data communication network now commonly referred to as the “Internet” 428. Local network 422 and Internet 428 both use electrical, electromagnetic or optical signals that carry digital data streams. The signals through the various networks and the signals on network link 420 and through communication interface 418, which carry the digital data to and from computer system 400, are example forms of transmission media.
Computer system 400 can send messages and receive data, including program code, through the network(s), network link 420 and communication interface 418. In the Internet example, a server 430 might transmit a requested code for an application program through Internet 428, ISP 426, local network 422 and communication interface 418.
The received code may be executed by processor 404 as it is received, and/or stored in storage device 410, or other non-volatile storage for later execution.
In the foregoing specification, embodiments of the invention have been described with reference to numerous specific details that may vary from implementation to implementation. The specification and drawings are, accordingly, to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense. The sole and exclusive indicator of the scope of the invention, and what is intended by the applicants to be the scope of the invention, is the literal and equivalent scope of the set of claims that issue from this application, in the specific form in which such claims issue, including any subsequent correction.
This application claims the benefit of Provisional Appln. No. 62/280,862, filed Jan. 20, 2016, titled “Storage Index And Columnar Cache Relocation During ASM Rebalance”, the entire contents of which is hereby incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein, under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e). This application is related to the following applications, the entire contents of each of which is hereby incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein: U.S. Pat. No. 9,292,564, filed Jul. 21, 2014 and issued Mar. 22, 2016, titled “Mirroring, In Memory, Data From Disk To Improve Query Performance”, referred to herein as the “Mirroring Application”;U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/726,372, filed May 29, 2015, titled “Optimizing A Query With Extrema Function Using In-Memory Data Summaries On The Storage Server”;U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/268,524, filed Sep. 16, 2016, titled “Reducing Data I/O Using In-Memory Data Structures”;U.S. Pat. No. 9,430,550, filed Sep. 28, 2012 and issued Aug. 30, 2016, titled “Clustering A Table In A Relational Database Management System”;U.S. Pat. No. 8,996,544, filed Sep. 28, 2012 and issued Mar. 31, 2015, titled “Pruning Disk Blocks Of A Clustered Table In A Relational Database Management System”;U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/245,934, filed Apr. 4, 2014, titled “Techniques For Using Zone Map Information For Post Index Access Pruning”;U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/840,811, filed Mar. 15, 2013, titled “Method To Accelerate Queries Using Dynamically Generated Alternate Data Formats In Flash Cache”;U.S. Patent Appln. No. 62/245,193, filed Oct. 22, 2015, titled “Columnar Caching In Tiered Storage”; andU.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/490,367, filed Sep. 18, 2014, titled “Movement Offload To Storage Systems”.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4425615 | Swenson et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
4782325 | Jeppsson et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
5255356 | Michelman et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5265246 | Li | Nov 1993 | A |
5504890 | Sanford | Apr 1996 | A |
5717893 | Mattson | Feb 1998 | A |
5742792 | Yanai et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5765034 | Recio | Jun 1998 | A |
5778430 | Ish et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5848408 | Jakobsson et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5870759 | Bauer et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5943689 | Tamer | Aug 1999 | A |
5987453 | Krishna et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5999943 | Nori et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6009432 | Tarin | Dec 1999 | A |
6023695 | Osborn et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6035306 | Lowenthal et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6049798 | Bishop et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6128621 | Weisz | Oct 2000 | A |
6457105 | Spencer et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6484179 | Roccaforte | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6618729 | Bhashyam et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6636870 | Roccaforte | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6662174 | Shah et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6665684 | Zait et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6728823 | Walker et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6732115 | Shah et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6748394 | Shah et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6778996 | Roccaforte | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6785666 | Nareddy et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6804714 | Tummalapalli | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6865575 | Smith et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6898608 | Hopeman et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6920640 | Srinivasan et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6922754 | Liu et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6928451 | Mogi et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6957222 | Ramesh | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6973457 | Bastawala | Dec 2005 | B1 |
7007029 | Chen | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7028046 | Anjur et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7031953 | Shah et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7031994 | Lao et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7047253 | Murthy et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7069324 | Tiwana et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7072897 | Shah et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7076507 | Tarin | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7080090 | Shah et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7089331 | Gollapudi et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7093162 | Barga et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7096224 | Murthy et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7103590 | Murthy et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7113951 | Bourekas | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7143098 | Chen et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7149769 | Lubbers et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7159076 | Madter | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7165144 | Choubal et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7167859 | Shah et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7228300 | Lei et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7233982 | Chen | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7272589 | Guay | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7287022 | Netz et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7290090 | Madter | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7313559 | Netz et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7315849 | Bakalash et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7320001 | Chen | Jan 2008 | B1 |
7333982 | Bakalash et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7366730 | Greenfield et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7373353 | Adler et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7379944 | Adler et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7383275 | Chen et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7389283 | Adler | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7389284 | Surlaker et al. | Jun 2008 | B1 |
7392248 | Bakalash et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7346617 | Wong | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7415457 | Dombroski et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7418438 | Gould et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7433886 | Rathakrishnan | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7437372 | Chen et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7461147 | Mowat et al. | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7480662 | Postapov et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7480663 | Colossi et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7496589 | Jain et al. | Feb 2009 | B1 |
7502894 | Luo | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7505888 | Legault et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7506103 | Madter | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7558779 | Luo | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7593955 | Legault et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7610300 | Legault et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7610351 | Gollaapudi et al. | Oct 2009 | B1 |
7617235 | Srinivasan et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7617312 | Tummalapalli | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7636814 | Karr et al. | Dec 2009 | B1 |
7657503 | Cormode et al. | Feb 2010 | B1 |
7657516 | Zaman et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7660823 | Clover | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7685092 | Reichert et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7689621 | Huber et al. | Mar 2010 | B1 |
7707143 | Bruce et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7716167 | Colossi et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7716172 | Anjur et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7765246 | Basu et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7769733 | Chen et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7774379 | Basu et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7779038 | Adler et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7814104 | Raghavan et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7831082 | Adler et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7831615 | Bailey et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7836262 | Gunna et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7860891 | Adler et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7873664 | Andersche et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7873684 | Sounder et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7890546 | Shah et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7895191 | Colossi et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7904327 | Phelan et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7904562 | Takase et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7930200 | McGuirtk et al. | Apr 2011 | B1 |
7949674 | Middelfart | May 2011 | B2 |
7966322 | Clover | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7966330 | Raghavan et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7979425 | Garg et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7996378 | Wang et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8000996 | Sanli et al. | Aug 2011 | B1 |
8001112 | Dombroski | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8032499 | Faerber et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8041670 | Bakalash et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8051102 | Everett | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8065262 | Bailey | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8082239 | Yang et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8126871 | Malloy et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8131533 | Legault et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8135688 | Shankar et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8150850 | Herrnstadt | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8160917 | Solanki et al. | Apr 2012 | B1 |
8161085 | Souder et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8170984 | Bakalash et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8195602 | Bakalash et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8195645 | Thiebaut-George | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8200612 | Soylemez et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8203972 | Sauermann | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8209280 | Kearney et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8209294 | Shankar et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8244984 | Glasco et al. | Aug 2012 | B1 |
8327080 | Der | Dec 2012 | B1 |
8370452 | Harvell et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8392382 | Marwah et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8433684 | Munoz | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8583692 | Ganesh | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8645337 | Kapoor et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8832142 | Marwah et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8856484 | Ben-Trion et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
9292564 | Kamp et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9514187 | Ziauddin | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9941311 | Hayk et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9952782 | Chandrasekaran | Apr 2018 | B1 |
20020059287 | Karasudani | May 2002 | A1 |
20020078068 | Krishnaprasad et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020095421 | Koskas | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20030115324 | Blumenau et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030126143 | Roussopoulos | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030195898 | Agarwal et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040003087 | Chambliss et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040033803 | Varonen et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040064466 | Manikutty et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040117396 | Avadhanam et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040117441 | Liu et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040148486 | Burton | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040153435 | Gudbjartsson et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040177065 | Tropf | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040225845 | Kruckemyer et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040254943 | Malcom | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050004936 | Potapov | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050033756 | Kottomtharayil | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050044102 | Gupta et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050055355 | Murthy et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050055380 | Thompson et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050056520 | Dharmapurikar et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050086267 | Avadhanam et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050102467 | Lam et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050160224 | Cuomo et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050165798 | Cherkauer et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050193160 | Bhatt et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050210202 | Choubal et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060047670 | Yu et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060064441 | Yamamoto | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060106890 | Paul et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060173833 | Purcell et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060224451 | Kerschbrock et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060224551 | Lariba-Pey et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060253429 | Raghavan | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070041718 | Fontijn | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070006757 | Morris et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070061287 | Le et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070078813 | Beavin | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070078914 | Correl | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070124415 | Lev-Ran et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070156957 | MacHardy et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070220348 | Mendoza et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070260819 | Gao et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080046736 | Arimilli et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080059492 | Tarin | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080014759 | Young-Lai | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080155229 | Beyer et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080195668 | Chandrasekar et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080235479 | Scales | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080256250 | Wakefield | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080281784 | Zane et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080281865 | Price et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080307266 | Chandrasekaran | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090106210 | Slezak | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090193189 | Carswell et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090248871 | Takase et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090307290 | Barsness et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100017556 | Chin et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100070448 | Omoigui | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100077107 | Lee et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100082648 | Potapov | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100122026 | Umamageswaran et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100161567 | Makela | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100235335 | Heman et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100235344 | Chandrasekar | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100250549 | Muller et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100257181 | Zhou | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100281017 | Hu | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100332901 | Nussbaum et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110016157 | Bear et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110022801 | Flynn | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110029569 | Ganesh et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110035369 | Halasipuram | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110066791 | Goyal | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110137940 | Gradin et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110138123 | Aditya et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110173325 | Cherian et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110191522 | Condict | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110191543 | Craske et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110258376 | Young | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120005184 | Thilagar et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120084287 | Lakshminarayan | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120117038 | Ganesh et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120117054 | Shrinivas | May 2012 | A1 |
20120173515 | Chanho et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120173774 | Lee | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120209873 | He | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120290588 | Egan | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120296883 | Ganesh | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120323971 | Pasupuleti | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130086330 | Baddepudi | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130151491 | Gislason | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130198165 | Cheng | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130212332 | Umamageswaran | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130232190 | Miller et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130326152 | Loaiza et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140040218 | Kimura et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140075493 | Krishnan et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140108751 | Brown et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140281247 | Loaiza et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140337314 | Potapov et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150088811 | Hase et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150088822 | Raja et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150088824 | Kamp et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150088830 | Kamp et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150088926 | Chavan et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150089125 | Mukherjee et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150089134 | Mukherjee et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150089138 | Tao et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150089140 | Sridharan et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150100556 | Sekiguchi | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150149479 | Geringer et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150242452 | Dickie | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20160092491 | Cowling | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160092507 | Ng et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160140137 | Konik | May 2016 | A1 |
20170060918 | Iyer | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170116136 | Macnicol | Apr 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101150483 | Mar 2008 | CN |
2 608 070 | Jun 2013 | EP |
1 332 631 | Oct 1973 | GB |
2409 301 | Jun 2005 | GB |
2002278704 | Sep 2002 | JP |
2003150419 | May 2003 | JP |
2004038758 | Feb 2004 | JP |
WO 9318461 | Sep 1993 | WO |
WO2007078444 | Jul 2007 | WO |
WO2012032184 | Mar 2012 | WO |
WO 2012032184 | Mar 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Thanh Hung; “New Objective Function for Vertical Partitioning in Database System”; 2008; Processing of the Spring Young Researcher's Colloquium on Database and Information Systems SYrCoDIS (Year: 2008). |
Ng, U.S. Appl. No. 14/726,372, filed May 29, 2015, Office Action, dated Sep. 19, 2017. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/840,811, filed Mar. 15, 2013, Interview Summary, dated Apr. 27, 2015. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/629,897, filed Sep. 28, 2012, Office Action, dated Mar. 18, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/629,897, filed Sep. 28, 2012, Office Action, dated Jun. 19, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/629,897, filed Sep. 28, 2012, Final Office Action, dated Jan. 4, 2016. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/629,897, filed Sep. 28, 2012, Notice of Allowance, dated Apr. 28, 2016. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/629,897, filed Sep. 28, 2012, Office Action, dated Feb. 26, 2016. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/629,897, filed Sep. 28, 2012, Office Action, dated Oct. 5, 2015. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/629,907 filed Sep. 28, 2012, Office Action, dated May 22, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/629,907, filed Sep. 28, 2012, Notice of Allowance, dated Dec. 1, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/840,811, filed Mar. 15, 2013, Final Office Action, dated Jul. 15, 2015. |
Loaiza, U.S. Appl. No. 13/840,811, filed Mar. 15, 2013, Office Action, dated Dec. 15, 2016. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/840,811, filed Mar. 15, 2013, Interview Summary, dated Apr. 5, 2016. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/490,367, filed Sep. 18, 2014, Office Action, dated Mar. 10, 2016. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/840,811, filed Mar. 15, 2013, Office Action, dated Jan. 12, 2015. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/245,934, filed Apr. 4, 2014, Notice of Allowance, dated Jul. 25, 2016. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/245,934, filed Apr. 4, 2014, Office Action, dated Mar. 17, 2016. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/337,179, filed Jul. 21, 2014, Final Office Action, dated Apr. 10, 2015. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/337,179, filed Jul. 21, 2014, Interview Summary, dated Jun. 17, 2015. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/337,179, filed Jul. 21, 2014, Notice of Allowance, dated Nov. 3, 2015. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/337,179, filed Jul. 21, 2014, Office Action, dated Dec. 29, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/337,179, filed 074/21/2014, Notice of Allowance, dated Jul. 29, 2015. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/490,367, filed Sep. 18, 2014, Final Office Action, dated Oct. 6, 2016. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/840,811, filed Mar. 15, 2013, Final Office Action, dated Dec. 21, 2015. |
Loaiza, U.S. Appl. No. 13/840,811, filed Mar. 15, 2013, Office Action, dated Jan. 10, 2018. |
DB Technology, “Netezza Questions and Answers”, dated Aug. 2, 2009, 5 pages. |
“XQuery 1.0: An XML Query Language”, dated Dec. 14, 2010, W3C, 165 pages. |
IBM DB2 Universal Database, “Administration Guide: Planning”, IBM, dated Jan. l, 2004, 102 pages. |
Howard, Philip, “Netezza: More Than You Might Imagine”, Bloor Research, dated Oct. 3, 2006, 6 pages. |
Graefe et al., “Hash joins and hash teams in Microsoft SQL server,” 1998. Proceedings of the 24th VLDB Conference New York, USA, pp. 87-90. |
Farber et al., “SAP HANA Database—Data Management for Modern Business Applications”, SIGMOD Record, dated Dec. 2011, vol. 40, No. 4, 8 pages. |
Elmasri, et al, “Fundatmentals of Database Systems,” Third Edition, Addison-Wesley Longman, 2000, pp. 32, 70, 118, 131-132, 134, 155-159, 170, 252-254, 558, 569-573, 591-592, and 789-790 (26 pgs). |
Dittrich et al., “Towards a One Size Fits All Database Architecture” Proceedings of the 5th Biennial Conference on Innovative Data Systems Research, dated Jan. 6, 2011, 4 pages. |
Dijcks, Jean-Pierre, “A Not So fabulous New Release (The Data Warehouse Insider)”, dated Aug. 30, 2009, 9 pages. |
IBM, “Best Practices Physical Database Design for Data Warehouse Environments”, dated 2012, 70 pages. |
DBMS 2: DataBase Management System Services, “Netezza vs. Conventional Data Warehousing RDBMS”, dated Sep. 20, 2006, 8 pages. |
Khalid Sayood:, “Introduction to data Compression”, Morgan Kaufmann Publisher, dated Dec. 1996, 4 pages. |
Chen et al., “Adjoined Dimension Colum Clustering to Improve Data Warehouse Query Performance”, IEEE, dated 2008, 4 pages. |
Bloom, Burton H. (1970), “Space/time trade-offs in hash coding with allowable errors”, Communications of the ACM 13 (7): 422-426. |
Birmingham, David, “Netezza Underground”, “Zone Maps and Data Power”, dated Jul. 11, 2011, 5 pages. |
Big Data Topics, “Using nz_Zonemap to Visualize Netezza's Zone Map Effectiveness”, dated Jul. 20, 2012, 5 pages. |
Battacharjee et al., “Efficient Query Processing for Multi-Dimensionally Cluster Tables in DB2”, Proceedings dated 2003, VLDB Conference, dated Jan. 1, 2013, 12 pages. |
Banerjee et al., “Oracle8i-the XML Enabled Data Management System”, dated 2000 Proceedings 16th International, Conference on Data Engineering, 8 pages. |
An Oracle White Paper, “A Technical Overview of the Oracle Exadata Database Machine and Exadata Storage Server”, dated Jun. 2012, 36 pages. |
Ailamaki, Anastassia, et al, “Weaving Relations for Cache Performance,” Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, Rome, Italy, Sep. 11-14, 2001, 14 pages. |
Abadi, D. et al., “Column-Stores vs. Row-Stores: How Different Are They Really?”, Sigmod 2008(14 pages). |
Dharmapurikar, Sarang, et al., “Deep Packet Inspection using Parallel Bloom Filters”, <http://www.arl.wustl.edu/˜sarang/27_dharmapurikar_s_updated.pdf>, retrieved on Oct. 28, 2005, 8 pages. |
Oracle, “Data Warehousing on Oracle RAC Best Practices,” Oct. 2008, 28 pages. http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/database/clustering/pdf/bp_rac_dw.pdf. |
W3Schools “SQL Update Statement”, Wayback Machine darted Apr. 19, 2012, on the internet www.w3schools.com/sql/sql_update.asp>, 1 page. |
Snow, Dwaine, “FUD Competitors are Spreading on Netezza”, dated Jun. 28, 2012, 3 pages. |
Shao et al., “Clotho: Decoupling Memory Page Layout from Storage Organization”, Proceedings of the 30th VLDB Conference, Toronto, Canada, 2004, 12 pages. |
Schaffner et al., “A Hybrid Row-Column OLTP Database Architecture for Operational Reporting”, dated Aug. 24, 2008, 14 pages. |
Ronthal, Adam, “Appliances Are Easy to Use”, Blog, dated Mar. 27, 2012, 3 pages. |
Ramamurthy, Ravishankar, “A Case for Fractured Mirrors” Proceedings of the 28th VLDB Conference, dated, 2002, 12 pages. |
Phipps, Colin:, “Mapping Deflated Files”, Internet Article, dated Jan. 6, 2013, http://zsync.moria.org.uk/paper/ch03s02.html, 3 pages. |
Oracle, Help Center, “Database Installation Guide”, 3 Oracle Grid Infrastructure for a Standalone Server, dated 2016, 29 pages. |
IBM TDB, “A Scheduling Algorithm for Processing Mutually Exclusive Workloads in a multi-system Configuration”, ip.com dated Aug. 19, 2002 (3 pages). |
Oracle, “Oracle7 Server Concepts”, Release 7.3, dated Feb. 1996, 178 pages. |
Zhe, Li, et al., “PERF join: an alternative to two-way semijoin and Bloomjoin” Proceedings of the 1995 ACM CIKM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management 1995, pp. 187-144. |
Oracle Database, “Oracle Real Application Clusters (RAC)”, An Oracle White Paper, dated Jun. 2013; 23 pages. |
O'Neil et al., “The Star Schema Benchmark and Augmented fact Table Indexing”, dated Aug. 24, 2009, 16 pages. |
O'Neil, P., et al., “Multi-table joins through bitmapped join indices”, SIGMOD Record, ACM, New York, NY, US, vol. 24, No. 3, Sep. 1, 1995, pp. 8-11, ISSN: 0163-5808. |
NZGuv, Netezza Tips, Tricks and Cool SQL, “With Netezza Always Use Integer Join Keys for Good Compression, Zone Maps, and Joins” dated Nov. 20, 2010, 1 page. |
Nirmesh, Malviya, “Recovery Algorithms for In-Memory OLTP Databases”, Master of Science Thesis, dated Jul. 1, 2012, 66 pages. |
Netezza Database Software Technology, “A partial Overview of Netzza Database Software Technology”, dated Jun. 21, 2010, 12 pages. |
Nanda, Arupa, “Oracle Exadata: Smart Scans Meet Storage Indexes”, dated May 2011, 4 pages. |
Microsoft, “Database Instant File Initialization”, SQL Server 2016, https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms175935.aspx, 3 pages. |
Loizos et al., “Improving Join Efficiency with Extended Bloom Filter Operations”, AMC, 2007, 8 pages. |
Oracle, Automatic Storage Management Administrator's Guide, 1 Introduction to Oracle Automatic Storage Management, dated 2016, 12 pages. |
Macnicol, U.S. Appl. No. 15/268,254, filed Sep. 16, 2016, Notice of Allowance, dated Mar. 27, 2018. |
Ng, U.S. Appl. No. 14/726,372, filed May 29, 2015, Office Action, dated May 18, 2018. |
Loaiza, U.S. Appl. No. 13/840,811, filed Mar. 15, 2013, Notice of Allowance, dated Jun. 7, 2018. |
Loaiza, U.S. Appl. No. 13/840,811, filed Mar. 15, 2013, Final Office Action, dated Jul. 5, 2017. |
Sridharan, U.S. Appl. No. 14/490,367, filed Sep. 18, 2014, Notice of Allowance, dated May 12, 2017. |
Loaiza, U.S. Appl. No. 13/840,811, filed Mar. 15, 2013, Interview Summary, filed Mar. 30, 2017. |
Ng, U.S. Appl. No. 14/726,372, filed May 29, 2015, Notice of Allowance, dated Aug. 28, 2019. |
Meiyyappan, U.S. Appl. No. 15/721,328, filed Sep. 29, 2017, Office Action, dated Nov. 29, 2019. |
Oracle, “Using the Database Resource Manager”, Chapter 24, Using the Database Resource Manager, dated May 2006, 34 pages. |
Oracle Database, “Administrator's Guide”, 11g Release 2 (11.2), Chapter 27, dated May 2015, 65 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170206199 A1 | Jul 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62280862 | Jan 2016 | US |