Ubiquitous remote access to application programs and data has become commonplace as a result of the growth and availability of broadband and wireless network access. In addition, users are accessing application programs and data using an ever-growing variety of client devices (e.g., mobile devices, table computing devices, laptop/notebook/desktop computers, etc.). Data may be communicated to the mobile device from a remote server over a 3G and 4G mobile data networks or wireless networks such as WiFi and WiMax. Most mobile devices have access to the Internet and are able to interact with various types of application programs.
Disclosed herein are systems and methods for providing remote access to an application program executing on, e.g., a server. In accordance with some implementations, a method of providing remote access to at least one application program is disclosed. The method may include providing a server remote access program at a server computing device; enumerating at least one Uniform Resource Locator (URL) that is associated with the at least one application program; receiving a communication from a client at the at least one URL; intercepting display information associated with the at least one application program associated with the at least one URL; and communicating the display information to the client computing device using the server remote access program.
In accordance with other implementations, there is provided a method for providing remote access to an application program. The method may include providing a server remote access program at a server computing device; receiving a communication at the server computing device from a client computing device to access the application program; intercepting display data associated with the application program; and communicating the display data to the client computing device.
In accordance with yet other implementations, there is provided a method for providing remote access to an application program. The method may include providing a server remote access program at a server computing device, the server computing device hosting the application program; providing an display data interception scraping application that receives display data associated with the application; receiving a request at the server computing device from a client computing device, the request being made at an enumerated Uniform Resource Locator (URL) in order to access the application program; and communicating the display data from the server computing device to the client computing device.
Other systems, methods, features and/or advantages will be or may become apparent to one with skill in the art upon examination of the following drawings and detailed description. It is intended that all such additional systems, methods, features and/or advantages be included within this description and be protected by the accompanying claims.
The components in the drawings are not necessarily to scale relative to each other. Like reference numerals designate corresponding parts throughout the several views.
Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art. Methods and materials similar or equivalent to those described herein can be used in the practice or testing of the present disclosure. While implementations will be described for remotely accessing and viewing application programs, it will become evident to those skilled in the art that the implementations are not limited thereto.
Referring to
The server computing device 102A may be connected to a first Local Area Network (LAN) 109A and the server computing device 102B is connected to a second Local Area Network (LAN) 109B that are connected to the communications network 110. It is noted that any number of server computers may be connected to the communications network 110 in accordance with the present disclosure.
As shown in
The server remote access programs 107A and 107B and the client remote access program may be implemented using standard programming languages and communication is enabled using standard communication technologies such as, for example, Hyper Text Transfer Protocol (HTTP), virtual private networks (VPN), and secure socket layers (SSL) which are well known to those skilled in the art. Further, an instance of a server remote application may be provided on a different server than the server executing the screen scraping application. In such an implementation, screen data may be communicated over a direct or networked connection between the server executing the screen scraping application and the other server executing the server remote application. In some implementations, the server remote access programs 107A and 107B and the client remote access program enable the implementation of aspects of the present disclosure as a retrofit to existing technologies on the server side as well as on the client side.
As shown in
To provide remote access to the application program 103A, communication is established between, e.g., the client computing device and the server computing device 102A at an enumerated URL associated with the application program 103A. In particular, the communication is enabled by the server remote access program 107A and the client remote access program, as shown in
During a remote communications session with the client computing device, the server remote access program 107A receives screen data from the screen scraping application 105A. Upon receipt, the server remote access program 107A generates presentation data 109A of the screen image data and transmits the same to the client remote access program.
Optionally or additionally, the presentation data 109A may be generated according to hardware capabilities of the client computing device 112A, 112B, 112C or 112N, for example, accounting for processing capacity, memory size, type of graphical display, and type of user interface. Thus, the server computing device 102A may scale or resize the screen data that is communicated to the client computing device such that the screen data is displayed on the client computing devices 112A, 112B, 112C . . . 112N in accordance with the characteristics of the device. As such, each type of device that is participating in the collaborative session presents the user interface having a device-appropriate resolution based on information contained in the state model of
In some implementations, the presentation data 109A is generated based on a selection of a window or display region of the application program 103A. For example, a selection of a region or window to be displayed on the client computing device may be received at the server computing device 102A. The server computing device 102A may then crop the screen data such that only the selected region or window is generated in the presentation data 109A and communicated by the server remote access program 107A to the client remote access program.
In some implementations, the presentation data 109A may also be provided to the server computing device 102A. This enables a user at the server computing device 102A to see what is being displayed at the client computing devices 112A, 112B, 112C or 112N.
With reference now to
Optionally or additionally, the display of the application programs 103A and 103B may be presented through a process called recombination, which may be based on information contained in the state model of
As shown in
With reference now to
During a remote communications session with the client computing device, the server remote access program 107A receives screen data from the screen scraping application 105A. Upon receipt, the server remote access program 107A generates first presentation data 109A of the first screen image data and transmits the same to the client remote access programs 112A and 112N. Other aspects of the environment of
The environment of
In such an implementation, the remote access program 107A may act as a proxy server to intercept requests from the various web browsers in a co-browsing session. A web browser, once configured to use the remote access program 107A as a proxy server, sends a complete URL request to the remote access program 107A. The remote access program 107A then retrieves screen data from the screen scraping application 105A associated with the application program 103A, and sends the result of the request back to the web browsers.
The web browsers may execute a client remote access program (e.g., Flash, Silverlight, Java) to enable the co-browsing session to receive information. Additionally or alternatively, HTML5 may be used to enable the web browser to natively receive information. As such, the web browser may be the client remote access program.
In some implementations, users co-browsing within the system 100 may be interacting with plural application programs 103A and 103B (e.g., a hybrid of the environments of
In some implementations, the operation of the remote access program (server and client) is performed in cooperation with a state model 300, as illustrated in
Upon receipt of application data from the screen scraping application, the server remote access program updates the state model 300 in accordance with the screen or application data, generates presentation data in accordance with the updated state model, and provides the same to the user interface program on the client computing device. The state model 300 comprises an association of logical elements of the application program with corresponding states of the application program, with the logical elements being in a hierarchical order. For example, the logical elements may be a screen, a menu, a submenu, a button, etc. that make up the application program user interface. This enables the client device, for example, to natively display the logical elements. As such, a menu of the application program 103A that is presented on a mobile phone will look like a native menu of the mobile phone. Similarly, the menu of the application program 103A that is presented on desktop computer will look like a native menu of the desktop computer operating system. In accordance with aspects of the present disclosure, the screen image may be communicated as a single logical element in a separate channel to the client. The screen image may be referenced in the state model to enable the client remote access program to retrieve the screen image from the separate channel and display it on the client. As such, the screen will have a substantially similar appearance on each of the client computing devices 112A, 112B, 112C . . . 112N, although it may be scaled according to the characteristics of each device.
The state model 300 is determined such that each of the logical elements is associated with a corresponding state of the application program. The state model 300 may be determined such that the logical elements are associated with user interactions. For example, the logical elements of the application program are determined such that the logical elements comprise transition elements with each transition element relating a change of the state model 300 to one of control data and application representation data associated therewith.
In some implementations, the state information may include a reference or references to one or more rectangular regions that comprise the screen image generated by the application program. A control may be provided by the client remote access program to enable a user to select among the one or more rectangular regions for display at the client device. In some implementations, the control may provide a selection among one or more rectangular regions of screen image data created by plural application programs (e.g., 103A and 103B) for selection by a user.
In some implementations, as noted above with regard to
At 404, a communication is received from a client. A user may contact the server computing device 102A using the user interaction program on a client computing device. The client may also provide information to the server remote access program 107A about the client computing device's characteristics and capabilities.
At 406, the screen associated with the application is scraped. The display generated by the application program 103A scraped by the screen scraping application 105A. At 407, the screen may be scaled or cropped, if desired, by the application program (service). At 408, the presentation data is generated for communication to the client. In accordance with the client computing device's characteristics and capabilities, the service (i.e., screen scraping application) may scale or crop display information that is provided to the client computing device such that it is appropriately sized for the client computing device.
At 410, the state model is updated. As described above, the state model 300 is determined such that each of the logical elements is associated with a corresponding state of the application program. The screen image, which is communicated in a separate channel, may as a single logical element that is referenced in the state model. At 412, the presentation data and the state model are communicated to the client. The communication may be over the communications network 110. At 414, the screen data is retrieved from the separate channel and presented on the client device for viewing.
In accordance with some implementations, a user may interact with the application program 103A through the user interaction program and the cooperation of the client and server remote access programs. As such, the user interaction(s) may be used to update the state model at 416, which may be returned to the server computing device 102A to update the application program 103A.
Thus in view of the above, there is provided a system and method for non-invasively providing remote access to an application program running on a server.
In the operational flow 500, the URL mechanism described above is employed to provide remote access to the server-based application program. At 502, a remote access program is provided at a server computing device to enumerate one or more URLs associated with one or more applications. For example, server remote access program 107A may be provided on the server computing device 102A. A URL may be accessed within the user interaction program on a client computing device to access, e.g., the application program 103A running on the server computing device 102A. The server remote access program 107A may determine which application programs are running on the server computing device 102A to enumerate the URL associated with each of the applications and to provide access to the determined application programs at the URL.
At 504, a communication is received from a client. A user may contact the server computing device 102A by connecting to one or more of the enumerated URLs that are provided in the user interaction program on a client computing device. The client may also provide information to the server remote access program 107A about the client computing device's characteristics and capabilities.
At 506, the screen associated with the application is scraped. The display generated by the application program 103A scraped by the screen scraping application 105A. At 508, the presentation data is generated for communication to the client. In accordance with the client computing device's characteristics and capabilities, the server computing device 102A may scale, resize or crop display information that is provided to the client computing device such that it is appropriately sized for the client computing device.
At 510, the presentation data is communicated to the client. The communication may be over the communications network 110. At 512, the screen data is presented on the client device for viewing. In accordance with some implementations, a user may interact with the application program 103A through the user interaction program and the cooperation of the client and server remote access programs. As such, the user interaction(s) may be used to access one or more URLs presented in the user interaction program. At 514, a connection may be established via a selected URL such that the user may interact with a different application or currently with multiple applications. Further, more than one client computing device may remotely interact with an application program in accordance with
Thus in view of the above, there is provided yet another system and method for non-invasively providing remote access to an application program running on a server.
Numerous other general purpose or special purpose computing system environments or configurations may be used. Examples of well known computing systems, environments, and/or configurations that may be suitable for use include, but are not limited to, personal computers, server computers, handheld or laptop devices, multiprocessor systems, microprocessor-based systems, network personal computers (PCs), minicomputers, mainframe computers, embedded systems, distributed computing environments that include any of the above systems or devices, and the like.
Computer-executable instructions, such as program modules, being executed by a computer may be used. Generally, program modules include routines, programs, objects, components, data structures, etc. that perform particular tasks or implement particular abstract data types. Distributed computing environments may be used where tasks are performed by remote processing devices that are linked through a communications network or other data transmission medium. In a distributed computing environment, program modules and other data may be located in both local and remote computer storage media including memory storage devices.
With reference to
Computing device 600 may have additional features/functionality. For example, computing device 600 may include additional storage (removable and/or non-removable) including, but not limited to, magnetic or optical disks or tape. Such additional storage is illustrated in
Computing device 600 typically includes a variety of tangible computer readable media. Tangible computer readable media can be any available media that can be accessed by device 600 and includes both volatile and non-volatile media, removable and non-removable media.
Tangible computer storage media include volatile and non-volatile, and removable and non-removable media implemented in any method or technology for storage of information such as computer readable instructions, data structures, program modules or other data. Memory 604, removable storage 608, and non-removable storage 610 are all examples of computer storage media. Tangible computer storage media include, but are not limited to, RAM, ROM, electrically erasable program read-only memory (EEPROM), flash memory or other memory technology, CD-ROM, digital versatile disks (DVD) or other optical storage, magnetic cassettes, magnetic tape, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other medium which can be used to store the desired information and which can be accessed by computing device 600. Any such computer storage media may be part of computing device 600.
Computing device 600 may contain communications connection(s) 612 that allow the device to communicate with other devices. Computing device 600 may also have input device(s) 614 such as a keyboard, mouse, pen, voice input device, touch input device, etc. Output device(s) 616 such as a display, speakers, printer, etc. may also be included. All these devices are well known in the art and need not be discussed at length here.
It should be understood that the various techniques described herein may be implemented in connection with hardware or software or, where appropriate, with a combination of both. Thus, the methods and apparatus of the presently disclosed subject matter, or certain aspects or portions thereof, may take the form of program code (i.e., instructions) embodied in tangible media, such as floppy diskettes, CD-ROMs, hard drives, or any other machine-readable storage medium wherein, when the program code is loaded into and executed by a machine, such as a computer, the machine becomes an apparatus for practicing the presently disclosed subject matter. In the case of program code execution on programmable computers, the computing device generally includes a processor, a storage medium readable by the processor (including volatile and non-volatile memory and/or storage elements), at least one input device, and at least one output device. One or more programs may implement or utilize the processes described in connection with the presently disclosed subject matter, e.g., through the use of an application programming interface (API), reusable controls, or the like. Such programs may be implemented in a high level procedural or object-oriented programming language to communicate with a computer system. However, the program(s) can be implemented in assembly or machine language, if desired. In any case, the language may be a compiled or interpreted language and it may be combined with hardware implementations.
Although the subject matter has been described in language specific to structural features and/or methodological acts, it is to be understood that the subject matter defined in the appended claims is not necessarily limited to the specific features or acts described above. Rather, the specific features and acts described above are disclosed as example forms of implementing the claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/225,598, filed Mar. 26, 2014, and entitled “Non-Invasive Remote Access to an Application Program,” which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/586,007, filed Aug. 15, 2012, and entitled “Non-Invasive Remote Access to an Application Program.” The present application also claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Nos. 61/523,632 and 61/523,644, each filed on Aug. 15, 2011 and entitled “Non-Invasive Remote Access to an Application Program.” The above-referenced applications are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4975690 | Torres | Dec 1990 | A |
5249121 | Baum | Sep 1993 | A |
5345550 | Bloomfield | Sep 1994 | A |
5491800 | Goldsmith et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5555003 | Montgomery et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5742778 | Hao et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5844553 | Hao et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5870559 | Leshem et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5870759 | Bauer et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5903725 | Colyer | May 1999 | A |
5909545 | Frese, II et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5920311 | Anthias | Jul 1999 | A |
5978842 | Noble et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5987376 | Olson et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5996002 | Katsurabayashi et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6045048 | Wilz et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6061689 | Chang et al. | May 2000 | A |
6075531 | DeStefano | Jun 2000 | A |
6141698 | Krishnan et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6145098 | Nouri et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6151621 | Colyer et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6253228 | Ferris et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6342906 | Kumar et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6343313 | Salesky et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6453334 | Vinson et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6453356 | Sheard et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6529230 | Chong | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6570563 | Honda | May 2003 | B1 |
6601233 | Underwood | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6602185 | Uchikubo | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6662210 | Carleton et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6698021 | Amini et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6742015 | Bowman-Amuah | May 2004 | B1 |
6748418 | Yoshida et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6763371 | Jändel | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6792607 | Burd et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6918113 | Patel et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6938096 | Greschler et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6938212 | Nakamura | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6970459 | Meier | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6976077 | Lehew et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6981062 | Suryanarayana | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6996605 | Low et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7003550 | Cleasby et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7065568 | Bracewell et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7069227 | Lintel, III et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7073059 | Worely et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7133895 | Lee et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7149761 | Cooke et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7152092 | Beams et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7167893 | Malone et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7174504 | Tsao | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7181686 | Bahrs | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7191233 | Miller | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7193985 | Lewis et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7197561 | Lovy et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7240162 | de Vries | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7246063 | James et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7254634 | Davis et al. | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7287054 | Lee et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7320131 | O'Toole, Jr. | Jan 2008 | B1 |
7343310 | Stender | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7346616 | Ramanujam et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7350151 | Nakajima | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7356563 | Leichtling et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7363342 | Wang et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7418711 | Lee et al. | Aug 2008 | B1 |
7451196 | de Vries et al. | Nov 2008 | B1 |
7533146 | Kumar | May 2009 | B1 |
7577751 | Vinson et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7620901 | Carpenter et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7624185 | Miller et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7647370 | Liu et al. | Jan 2010 | B1 |
7650444 | Dirstine et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7656799 | Samuels et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7676506 | Reinsch | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7703024 | Kautzleben et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7706399 | Janczak | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7725331 | Schurenberg et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7783568 | Fracchia et al. | Aug 2010 | B1 |
7802183 | Essin | Sep 2010 | B1 |
7810089 | Sundarrajan et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7831919 | Viljoen et al. | Nov 2010 | B1 |
7921078 | McCuller | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7941488 | Goodman et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7950026 | Urbach | May 2011 | B1 |
7966572 | Matthews et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7984115 | Tien et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8010901 | Rogers | Aug 2011 | B1 |
8024523 | de Vries et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8065166 | Maresh et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8122341 | Dayan et al. | Feb 2012 | B1 |
8195146 | Prakash et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8239773 | Billman | Aug 2012 | B1 |
8261345 | Hitomi et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8356252 | Raman et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8359591 | de Vries et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8478307 | Hayes | Jul 2013 | B1 |
8509230 | Vinson et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8527591 | Pirnazar | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8527706 | de Vries et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8533103 | Certain et al. | Sep 2013 | B1 |
8572178 | Frazzini et al. | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8606952 | Pasetto et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8607158 | Molander et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8627081 | Grimen et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8667054 | Tahan | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8832260 | Raja et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8856259 | Burckart et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8909703 | Gupta et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8910112 | Li et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8924512 | Stoyanov et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8935328 | Tumuluri | Jan 2015 | B2 |
9152970 | Trahan | Oct 2015 | B1 |
9239812 | Berlin | Jan 2016 | B1 |
9256856 | Fairs et al. | Feb 2016 | B1 |
9686205 | Leitch et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
20010006382 | Sevat | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010033299 | Callaway et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010037358 | Clubb et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010047393 | Arner et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020032751 | Bharadwaj | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020032783 | Tuatini | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020032804 | Hunt | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020051541 | Glick et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020092029 | Smith | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020198941 | Gavrilescu et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030014735 | Achlioptas et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030023670 | Walrath | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030055893 | Sato et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030065738 | Yang et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030120324 | Osborn et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030120762 | Yepishin et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030149721 | Alfonso-Nogueiro et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030149941 | Tsao | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030163514 | Waldschmidt | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030179230 | Seidman | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030184584 | Vachuska et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030208472 | Pham | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040015842 | Nanivadekar et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040029638 | Hytcheson et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040039742 | Barsness et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040045017 | Dorner et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040068516 | Lee et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040077347 | Lauber et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040103195 | Chalasani et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040103339 | Chalasani et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040106916 | Quaid et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040117804 | Scahill et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040128354 | Horikiri et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040153525 | Borella | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040162876 | Kohavi | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040183827 | Putterman et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040236633 | Knauerhase et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040243919 | Muresan et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040249885 | Petropoulakis et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050005024 | Samuels et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050010871 | Ruthfield et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050021687 | Anastassopoulos et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050050229 | Comeau et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050114711 | Hesselink et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050114789 | Chang et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050138631 | Bellotti et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050154288 | Wang | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050188046 | Hickman et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050188313 | Matthews et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050190203 | Gery et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050193062 | Komine et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050198578 | Agrawala et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050216421 | Barry et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050240906 | Kinderknecht et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050246422 | Laning | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060004874 | Hutcheson et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060026006 | Hindle | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060031377 | Ng et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060031481 | Patrick et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060036770 | Hosn et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060041686 | Caspi et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060041891 | Aaron | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060053380 | Spataro et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060066717 | Miceli | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060069797 | Abdo et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060085245 | Takatsuka et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060085835 | Istvan et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060101397 | Mercer et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060112188 | Albanese et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060130069 | Srinivasan et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060179119 | Kurosawa et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060221081 | Cohen et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060231175 | Vondracek et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060236328 | DeWitt | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060242254 | Okazaki et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060258462 | Cheng et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060265689 | Kuznetsov et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060271563 | Angelo et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060288171 | Tsien | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060294418 | Fuchs | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070024645 | Purcell et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070024706 | Brannon et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070047535 | Varma | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070067754 | Chen et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070079244 | Brugiolo | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070112880 | Yang et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070120763 | De Paepe et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070130292 | Tzruya et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070143398 | Graham | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070203944 | Batra et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070203990 | Townsley et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070203999 | Townsley et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070208718 | Javid et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070226636 | Carpenter et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070233706 | Farber et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070244930 | Bartlette et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070244962 | Laadan et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070244990 | Wells | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070256073 | Truong et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070282951 | Selimis et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080016155 | Khalatian | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080028323 | Rosen et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080052377 | Light | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080134211 | Cui | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080146194 | Yang et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080159175 | Flack | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080183190 | Adcox et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080195362 | Belcher et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080276183 | Siegrist et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080301228 | Flavin | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080313282 | Warila et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080320081 | Shriver-Blake et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090070404 | Mazzaferri | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090080523 | McDowell | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090089742 | Nagulu et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090094369 | Woolbridge et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090106422 | Kriewall | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090119644 | de Vries et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090164581 | Bove et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090172100 | Callanan et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090187817 | Ivashin et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090209239 | Montesdeoca | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090217177 | DeGrazia | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090044171 | Avadhanula | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090328032 | Crow et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100012911 | Akinaga et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100017727 | Offer et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100018827 | Ueda | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100061238 | Godbole et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100077058 | Messer | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100082747 | Yue et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100115023 | Peled | May 2010 | A1 |
20100131591 | Thomas et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100150031 | Allen et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100174773 | Penner et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100205147 | Lee | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100223566 | Holmes et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100223661 | Yang | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100268762 | Pahlavan et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100268813 | Pahlavan et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100274858 | Lindberg et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100281107 | Fallows et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100306642 | Lowet | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110047190 | Lee et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110058052 | Bolton | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110113350 | Carlos et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110119716 | Coleman, Sr. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110128378 | Raji | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110138016 | Jung et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110138283 | Marston | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110145863 | Alsina et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110154302 | Balko et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110154464 | Agarwal et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110157196 | Nave et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110162062 | Kumar et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110184993 | Chawla et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110187652 | Huibers | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110191438 | Huibers et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110191823 | Huibers | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110213830 | Lopez et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110219419 | Reisman | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110222442 | Cole et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110223882 | Hellgren | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110246891 | Schubert et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110252152 | Sherry et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110314093 | Sheu et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120016904 | Mahajan et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120023418 | Frields et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120030275 | Boller et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120072833 | Song et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120072835 | Gross et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120079080 | Pishevar | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120079111 | Luukkala et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120084713 | Desai et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120090004 | Jeong | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120133675 | McDowell | May 2012 | A1 |
20120151373 | Kominac et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120154633 | Rodriguez | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120159308 | Tseng et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120159356 | Steelberg | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120169874 | Thomas et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120210242 | Burckart et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120210243 | Uhma et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120221792 | de Vries et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120226742 | Momchilov et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120233555 | Psistakis et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120245918 | Overton et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120246225 | Lemire et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120324032 | Chan | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120324358 | Jooste | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120331061 | Lininger | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130007227 | Hitomi et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130013671 | Relan et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130031618 | Momchilov | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130054679 | Jooste | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130070740 | Yovin | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130086155 | Thomas et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130086156 | McFadzean et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130086652 | Kavantzas et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130110895 | Valentino et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130113833 | Larsson | May 2013 | A1 |
20130117474 | Ajanovic et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130120368 | Miller | May 2013 | A1 |
20130132485 | Thomas et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130138791 | Thomas et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130147845 | Xie et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130159062 | Stiehl | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130159709 | Ivory et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130179962 | Arai et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130208966 | Zhao et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130212483 | Brakensiek et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130262566 | Stephure et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130290408 | Stephure et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130297676 | Binyamin | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130346482 | Holmes | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140136667 | Gonsalves et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140240524 | Julia et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140241229 | Bertorelle et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140258441 | L'Heureux et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140298420 | Barton et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150026338 | Lehmann et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150067769 | Barton et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150156133 | Leitch et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150163292 | Lemire et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150319252 | Momchilov et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20160054897 | Holmes et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160226979 | Lancaster et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20170228799 | Perry et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2646414 | Oct 2007 | CA |
2697936 | Mar 2009 | CA |
1278623 | Jan 2001 | CN |
1499841 | May 2004 | CN |
101539932 | Sep 2009 | CN |
102129632 | Jul 2011 | CN |
102821413 | Dec 2012 | CN |
0349463 | Jan 1990 | EP |
1422901 | May 2004 | EP |
2007084744 | Mar 1995 | JP |
2002055870 | Feb 2002 | JP |
2004287758 | Oct 2004 | JP |
2005031807 | Feb 2005 | JP |
2005521946 | Jul 2005 | JP |
2008099055 | Apr 2008 | JP |
4405812 | Jan 2010 | JP |
2010256972 | Nov 2010 | JP |
2295752 | Mar 2007 | RU |
2298287 | Apr 2007 | RU |
2305860 | Sep 2007 | RU |
1998025666 | Jun 1998 | WO |
1998058478 | Dec 1998 | WO |
2001016724 | Mar 2001 | WO |
2001091482 | Nov 2001 | WO |
2002009106 | Jan 2002 | WO |
2003032569 | Apr 2003 | WO |
2003083684 | Oct 2003 | WO |
2008011063 | Jan 2008 | WO |
2008087636 | Jul 2008 | WO |
2010060206 | Jun 2010 | WO |
2010088768 | Aug 2010 | WO |
2010127327 | Nov 2010 | WO |
2011087545 | Jul 2011 | WO |
2012093330 | Jul 2012 | WO |
2012127308 | Sep 2012 | WO |
2013024342 | Feb 2013 | WO |
2013046016 | Apr 2013 | WO |
2013072764 | May 2013 | WO |
2013076554 | May 2013 | WO |
2013109984 | Jul 2013 | WO |
2013128284 | Sep 2013 | WO |
2013153439 | Oct 2013 | WO |
2014033554 | Mar 2014 | WO |
2015080845 | Jun 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
ADASS XXI Conference Schedule, European Southern Observatory, http://www.eso.org/sci/meetings/2011/adass2011/program/schedule.html#day2, Nov. 7, 2011, 4 pages. |
Brandom, R., “Google Photos and the unguessable URL,” The Verge, retrieved on Sep. 25, 2017 from https://www.theverg.com/2015/6/23/8830977/goole-photos-security-public-url-privacy-protected, Jun. 23, 2015, 7 pages. |
“Calgary Scientific Revolutionizes Application Sharing and Advanced Collaboration with PureWeb 3.0,” Press Release, Jun. 21, 2011, 3 pages. |
Coffman, Daniel, et al., “A Client-Server Architecture for State-Dependent Dynamic Visualizations on the Web,” IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, 2010, 10 pages. |
Federl, P., “Remote Visualization of Large Multi-dimensional Radio Astronomy Data Sets,” Institute for Space Imaging Science, University of Calgary, 2012, pp. 1-10. |
Federl, P., “Remote Visualization of Large Multi-dimensional Radio Astronomy Data Sets,” Institute for Space Imaging Science, University of Calgary, 2012, pp. 11-22. |
Fraser, N., “Differential Synchronization,” Google, Mountain View, CA, Jan. 2009, 8 pages. |
GoInstant, Shared Browsing Technology, http://website.s3.goinstant.com.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Goinstant-Shared-Web-Technology.pdf, 2012, 4 pages. |
“GTK 3, Broadway and an HTML5 websocket gui, for free,” retrieved on Sep. 26, 2017 at http://compsci.ca/v3/viewtopic.php?t=36823, Apr. 12, 2014, pp. 1-3. |
Hong, C., et al., “Multimedia Presentation Authoring and Virtual Collaboration in Medicine,” International Journal of Kimics, vol. 8, No. 6, 2010, pp. 690-696. |
Jourdain, Sebastien, et al., “ParaViewWeb: A Web Framework for 3D Visualization and Data Processing,” International Journal of Computer Information Systems and Industrial Management Applications, vol. 3, 2011, pp. 870-877. |
Layers: Capture Every Item on Your Screen as a PSD Layered Image, Internet Website, retrieved on Jun. 30, 2016 at http://web.archive.org/web/20140218111143, 2014, 9 pages. |
Li, S.F., et al., “Integrating Synchronous and Asynchronous Collaboration with Virtual Network Computing,” Internet Computing, IEEE 4.3, 2000, pp. 26-33. |
Luo, Y., et al., “Real Time Multi-User Interaction with 3D Graphics via Communication Networks,” 1998 IEEE Conference on Information Visualization, 1998, 9 pages. |
Microsoft Computer Dictionary, Microsoft Press, 5th Edition, Mar. 15, 2002, p. 624. |
Mitchell, J. Ross, et al., A Smartphone Client-Server Teleradiology System for Primary Diagnosis of Acute Stroke, Journal of Medical Internet Research, vol. 13, Issue 2, 2011, 12 pages. |
ParaViewWeb, KitwarePublic, retrieved on Jan. 27, 2014 from http://www.paraview.org/Wiki/ParaViewWeb, 1 page. |
Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP), retrieved on May 4, 2014 from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remote_Desktop_Protocol, 7 pages. |
Remote Desktop Services (RDS), Remote App, retrieved on May 4, 2014 from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remote_Desktop_Services, 9 pages. |
Remote Desktop Services (RDS), Windows Desktop Sharing, retrieved on May 4, 2014 from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remote_Desktop_Services, 9 pages. |
Samesurf web real-time co-browser application, http://i.samesurf.com/i/0586021, 2009, 2 pages. |
Shim, H., et al., Providing Flexible Services for Managing Shared State in Collaborative Systems, Proceedings of the Fifth European Conference, 1997, pp. 237-252. |
Yang, L., et al., “Multirate Control in Internet-Based Control Systems,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Part C: Applications and Reviews, vol. 37, No. 2, 2007, pp. 185-192. |
European Search Report, dated Sep. 1, 2015, received in connection with European Patent Application No. 12824077.7. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion, dated Feb. 18, 2014, received in connection with International Patent Application No. PCT/IB2012/001590. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Dec. 28, 2012, received in connection with International Patent Application No. PCT/IB2012/001590. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180375916 A1 | Dec 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61523632 | Aug 2011 | US | |
61523644 | Aug 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14225598 | Mar 2014 | US |
Child | 15988139 | US | |
Parent | 13586007 | Aug 2012 | US |
Child | 14225598 | US |