Remote control system for a locomotive with solid state tilt sensor

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6470245
  • Patent Number
    6,470,245
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, January 31, 2002
    23 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 22, 2002
    22 years ago
  • Inventors
  • Original Assignees
  • Examiners
    • Cuchlinski, Jr.; William A.
    • Marc-Coleman; Marthe Y.
    Agents
    • Merchant & Gould P.C.
Abstract
A portable master controller for a locomotive remote control system. The portable master controller has a user interface for receiving commands to control the movement of the locomotive. The user interface is responsive to operator commands to generate control signals. A processing unit receives the control signals from the user interface to generate digital command signals directing the movement of the locomotive. A transmission unit receives the digital command signals and generates a RF transmission conveying the digital command signals to the slave controller. A solid-state tilt sensor in communication with the processing unit communicates inclination information to the processing unit about the portable master controller. The processing unit receives and processes the inclination information. If the inclination information indicates that the portable master controller is in an unsafe operational condition, the processing unit generates an emergency digital command signal to the transmission unit, without input from the operator, for directing the locomotive to acquire a secure condition.
Description




FIELD OF THE INVENTION




The present invention relates to an electronic system and components thereof for remotely controlling a locomotive. The system has a tilt sensor designed to operate in low temperatures often encountered in northern regions.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




Economic constraints have led railway companies to develop portable master controllers allowing a ground-based operator to remotely control a locomotive in a switching yard. The portable master controller has a transmitter communicating with a slave controller on the locomotive by way of a radio link. To enhance safety, the portable master controller carried by the operator is provided with a tilt-sensing device to monitor the spatial orientation of the portable master controller and determine occurrence of operator incapacitating events, such as the operator tripping and falling over objects and loss of conscience due to a medical condition, among others. When the tilt-sensing device reports that the portable master controller is outside the normal range of inclination, the portable master controller will automatically generate, without operator input, a command signal over the radio link to stop the locomotive.




Tilt-sensing devices used by prior art portable master controllers are in the form of mercury switches. Those have proven unreliable in cold temperature operations where the mercury bead in the switch can freeze and loose mobility. Attempts to overcome this drawback include adding thallium to the mercury to lower its freezing point. This solution, however, is objectionable because thallium is a toxic substance. Hence, for environmental reasons, thallium is very rarely used in the industrial community.




Against this background, the reader will appreciate that a clear need exists in the industry to develop a system and components thereof for remotely controlling a locomotive, featuring tilt-sensing devices that can reliably operate in very low temperatures and do not use mercury or thallium materials in their construction.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




In one broad aspect, the invention provides a portable master controller for a locomotive remote control system. The portable master controller has a user interface for receiving commands to control a movement of the locomotive. The user interface is responsive to operator commands to generate control signals. The portable master controller includes a processing unit receiving the control signals from the user interface to generate digital command signals directing the movement of the locomotive. A transmission unit receives the digital command signals and generates a RF transmission conveying the digital command signals to the slave controller.




A solid-state tilt sensor in communication with the processing unit communicates inclination information to the processing unit about the portable master controller. The processing unit receives and processes the inclination information. If the inclination information indicates that the portable master controller is in an unsafe operational condition, the processing unit generates an emergency digital command signal to the transmission unit, without input from the operator, for directing the locomotive to acquire a secure condition.




By “solid-state” is meant a tilt sensor that does not uses a liquid to produce inclination information.




In a specific and non-limiting example of implementation, the solid-state tilt sensor includes a single axis accelerometer responsive to the acceleration of gravity. Optionally, the accelerometer is a multi-axis device responding to vertical acceleration and acceleration in at least another axis, as well. The ability to assess acceleration levels in axes other than the vertical axis permits detection of unsafe conditions that do not necessarily translate into an excessive inclination of the portable master controller.




The inclination information sent by the solid-state tilt sensor can be in any form as long as it allows the processing unit to detect an unsafe operational condition. The determination as to what is safe and what is unsafe can vary greatly according to the specific application. All the variants, however, include a common denominator, which is an assessment of the degree of inclination of the portable master controller. In addition to the assessment of the degree of inclination, other parameters may be taken into account, such as the time during which the portable master controller remains beyond a certain inclination angle, among others.




Once the occurrence of an unsafe operational condition has been detected, the processing unit generates an emergency command signal to direct the locomotive to acquire a secure condition. A “secure” condition is a condition in which the risk of accident from the locomotive is substantially reduced. An example of a secure condition is stopping the locomotive.




In a second broad aspect, the invention provides a remote control system for a locomotive including in combination the portable master controller defined broadly above and the slave controller for mounting on-board the locomotive.




In third broad aspect, the invention provides a portable master controller that uses an accelerometer to generate inclination information.




Under a fourth broad aspect, the invention provides a remote control system for a locomotive that has a portable master controller using an accelerometer to generate inclination information.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS




A detailed description of examples of implementation of the present invention is provided hereinbelow with reference to the following drawings, in which:





FIG. 1

is a functional block diagram of the remote control system for a locomotive according to a specific and non-limiting example of implementation of the invention;





FIG. 2

is a structural block diagram of the portable master controller of the system shown in

FIG. 1

;





FIG. 3

is a structural block diagram of the slave controller of the system shown in

FIG. 1

; and





FIG. 4

is a flow chart illustrating a diagnostic procedure to identify a malfunction of the solid state tilt sensor.











In the drawings, embodiments of the invention are illustrated by way of example. It is to be expressly understood that the description and drawings are only for purposes of illustration and as an aid to understanding, and are not intended to be a definition of the limits of the invention.




DETAILED DESCRIPTION





FIG. 1

is a high-level block diagram of a remote control system


10


for a locomotive. The remote control system


10


includes a portable master controller


12


that is carried by a human operator. The system


10


also includes a slave controller


14


mounted on-board the locomotive (locomotive not shown in the drawings). The portable master controller


12


and the slave controller


14


exchange information over a radio link


16


.




The portable master controller


12


includes a user-interface


18


through which the operator enters commands to control the movement of the locomotive. Such commands may include forward movement, backward movement, movement at a certain speed, coasting, stopping, etc. Optionally, the user interface


18


also conveys information to the operator, such as status information, alarms, etc. The user-interface


18


may comprise a variety of input mechanisms to permit the user to enter commands. Those input mechanisms may include electromechanical knobs and switches, keyboard, pointing device, touch sensitive surface and speech recognition capability, among others. Similarly, the user-interface


18


may comprise a variety of output mechanisms to communicate information to the user such as visual display or audio feedback, among others.




The user-interface


18


generates control signals


20


, which represent the inputs of the operator. In instances where the user-interface


18


also communicates information to the operator, data signals


22


are supplied to the user-interface


18


from a processing unit


24


, to be described below. The data signals convey the information that is to be communicated to the user.




The processing unit


24


receives and processes the control signals


20


. The extent of the processing performed by the unit


24


will depend on the particular control strategy implemented by the system


10


. At its output, the processing unit


24


will issue digital command signals


26


that direct the operation of the locomotive. Those command signals


26


represent commands, such as move forward, move backwards, stop, move at a selected speed, throttle command, brake command, among others.




The command signals


26


are supplied to a transmission unit


28


that generates a Radio Frequency (RF) transmission conveying those commands over the RF link


16


to the slave controller


14


.




The slave controller


14


is comprised of a receiver module


30


for sensing the RF transmission over the RF link


16


. The receiver module


30


generates at its output digital command signals


32


that are passed to a processing module


34


that processes those signals and issues local signals


36


that control the locomotive. The local signals


36


include, for example, throttle settings, brake settings, etc.




An important feature of the system


10


is a tilt sensor


38


that is part of the portable master controller


12


. The tilt sensor


38


produces inclination information about the portable master controller


12


and sends this inclination information to the processing unit


24


. The processing unit


24


will analyze this information to determine if the portable master controller


12


is in a potentially unsafe operational condition. In the affirmative, the processing unit


24


generates internally an emergency digital command signal directing the locomotive to acquire a secure condition. The digital command signal is sent to the slave controller via the transmission unit


28


and the radio link


16


.




The inclination information processing strategy, which determines if the portable master controller


12


is in an operational condition that is safe or unsafe, can greatly vary and can take into account various parameters. One of those parameters is the degree of inclination of the portable master controller


12


. In one example, the degree of inclination can be quantified in terms of angle of inclination. Another parameter is the time during which the portable master controller


12


is maintained at or beyond a certain degree of inclination. One possible strategy is to declare an unsafe operational condition only after a certain degree of inclination has been maintained for a predetermined time period, thus avoiding issuing the emergency digital command signal in cases where the operator moves his body in such a way that it will excessively tilt the portable master controller


12


, but only for a moment.




The reader will appreciate that a wide variety of inclination information processing strategies are possible without departing from the spirit of the invention. All those strategies rely on the degree of inclination as parameter, alone or in combination with other parameters.




In a specific example of implementation, the tilt sensor


38


is an accelerometer that is responsive to static gravitational acceleration. By “static” it is meant that the accelerometer senses the force of gravity even when the portable master controller


12


is not moving vertically up or down. The accelerometer is mounted in the casing of the portable master controller


12


such that the axis along which the acceleration is sensed coincides with the vertical axis. When the portable master controller


12


is inclined, the component of the force of gravity along the vertical axis changes which allows determining the degree of inclination of the portable master controller


12


.




Optionally, the accelerometer may also be sensitive about axes other than the vertical axis to detect abnormal accelerations indicative of potentially unsafe conditions that may not translate in an abnormal inclination of the portable master controller


12


. Examples of such other abnormal accelerations arise when the portable master controller


12


(or the operator) is severely bumped without, however, the operator falling on the ground.




In a possible variant the tilt sensor


38


may include a plurality of accelerometers, each accelerometer being sensitive in a different axis.




When the tilt sensor


38


includes an accelerometer that outputs a signal having both a dynamic and a static component, it is desirable to filter out the dynamic component such as to be able to more easily determine or derive the orientation of the master controller


12


. Techniques to filter out the dynamic component of the output signal are known in the art and will not be discussed here in detail.




If the processing unit


24


recognizes an unsafe operational condition, it issues an emergency command signal to secure the locomotive. One example of securing the locomotive includes directing the locomotive to perform to stop.




In a specific and non-limiting example of implementation the tilt sensor


38


is based on an accelerometer available from Analog Devices Inc. in the USA, under part number ADXL202. The output of the tilt sensor


38


is a pulse width modulated signal, where the width of the pulse indicates the degree of inclination.




For safety reasons, it is desirable for the processing unit


24


to determine when the tilt sensor


38


may be malfunctioning. At this end the processing unit


24


has diagnostic unit


25


that implements a diagnostic procedure. The diagnostic procedure runs continuously during the operation of the master controller


12


. The flow chart of the diagnostic procedure is shown at FIG.


4


. The procedure starts at step


100


. At step


102


the signal from the tilt sensor


38


is received by the processing unit


24


. The diagnostic procedure then performs two series of actions designed to confirm the proper operation of the tilt sensor


38


and the continued operation of the tilt sensor


38


. The proper operation procedure will be described first. At step


104


a timer is started. The timer runs for a predetermined period of time. For example, this period of time can be from a couple of seconds to a couple of minutes. Decision step


26


detects changes in the output signal of the tilt sensor


38


. If a change is noted, i.e., indicating a movement of the master controller


12


, the timer


104


is reset. If no change is noted i.e., indicating a lack of master controller movement during the predetermined time period (the timer expires), the step


108


is initiated.




The step


108


verifies the integrity of tilt sensor


108


by performing a calibration test. This is effected by subjecting the tilt sensor


38


to a known condition that will produce a variation in the output signal. One possibility is to subject the tilt sensor


38


to a self-test which will induce a change in the output signal. Sending a control signal to a pin of the tilt sensor


38


initiates such self-test. At step


110


, the processing unit


24


observes the output signal and if a change is noted, which indicates that no detectable malfunction is present, then processing continues at step


100


. Otherwise, the conditional step


110


branches to step


112


that triggers an alarm. The alarm may be an audible, visual (or both) indication on the user interface


18


that a malfunction has been noted. Once the alarm at step


112


has been triggered, one possibility for the processing unit


24


is to generate an emergency digital command signal to the transmission unit


28


without input from the operator, for directing the locomotive to acquire a secure condition.




The continued operation procedure is performed at the same time as the proper operation procedure. The continued operation procedure includes a decision step


114


at which the output signal of the tilt sensor


38


is validated. In this example, the validation includes observing the signal to determine if it is within a normal range of operation. For example, when the output signal of the tilt sensor


38


is a pulse width modulated signal (PWM) the decision step


114


screens the signal continuously and if the frequency of the signal falls outside the normal range of operation of the tilt sensor


38


or the signal disappears altogether, a tilt sensor failure is declared. When such tilt sensor failure occurs, the alarm


112


is triggered and the locomotive brought to a secure condition, as described earlier.




It should be noted that the diagnostic procedure implemented by the processing unit


24


might vary from the example described earlier without departing from the spirit of the invention. For instance, the diagnostic procedure may include only the steps necessary to perform the proper operation procedure without the steps for performing the continued operation procedure. Alternatively, the diagnostic procedure may include only the steps necessary to perform the continued operation procedure without the steps for performing the proper operation procedure. Objectively, both the proper operation and continued operation procedures are desirable from the standpoint of enhanced safety, however one of them can be omitted while still providing at least some degree of protection against tilt sensor failure.





FIG. 2

is a structural block diagram of the portable master controller


12


. The portable master controller


12


is largely software implemented and includes a Central Processing Unit (CPU)


40


that connects with a data storage medium


42


over a data bus


44


. The data storage medium


42


holds the program element that is executed by the CPU


40


to implement various functional elements of the portable master controller


12


, in particular the processing unit


24


. Data is exchanged between the CPU


40


and the data storage medium


42


over the data bus


44


. Peripherals connect to the data bus


44


such as to send and receive information from the CPU


40


and the data storage medium


42


. Those peripherals include the user interface


18


, the transmission unit


28


and the tilt sensor


38


.




It should be noted that the diagnostic unit


25


(shown in

FIG. 1

) is implemented in software by the processing unit


24


. Alternatively, the diagnostic procedure may be implemented partly in hardware and partly in software or only in hardware.





FIG. 3

is a structural block diagram of the slave controller


14


. As is the case with the portable master controller


12


, the slave controller


14


has a CPU


45


connected to a data storage medium


48


with a data bus


50


. The data storage medium


48


holds the program element that is executed by the CPU


46


to implement various functional elements of the slave controller


14


, in particular the processing module


34


. Peripherals connect to the data bus


50


such as to send and receive information from the CPU


46


and the data storage medium


48


. Those peripherals include the receiver module


30


and an interface


52


through which the slave controller


14


connects to the locomotive controls.




Although various embodiments have been illustrated, this was for the purpose of describing, but not limiting, the invention. Various modifications will become apparent to those skilled in the art and are within the scope of this invention, which is defined more particularly by the attached claims.



Claims
  • 1. A portable master controller for a locomotive remote control system, the locomotive remote control system having a slave controller mounted on-board a locomotive, said portable master controller comprising:a) a user interface for receiving commands to control a movement of the locomotive from a human operator, said user interface being responsive to the commands from the human operator to generate control signals; b) a processing unit in communication with said user interface for receiving the control signals to generate digital command signals for directing the movement of the locomotive; c) a transmission unit in communication with said processing unit for receiving the digital command signals and for generating an RF transmission conveying the digital command signals to the slave controller; d) a solid-state tilt sensor in communication with said processing unit for supplying to said processing unit inclination information about said portable master controller, said processing unit: i) being operative to determine at least in part on the basis of the inclination information if said portable master controller is in a safe operational condition or in an unsafe operational condition; ii) when said processing unit determines that the portable master controller is in an unsafe operational condition said processing unit is operative to generate an emergency digital command signal to said transmission unit without input from the operator, for directing the locomotive to acquire a secure condition.
  • 2. A portable master controller as defined in claim 1, wherein said solid-state tilt sensor includes an accelerometer.
  • 3. A portable master controller as defined in claim 2, wherein said accelerometer responds to static gravitational acceleration.
  • 4. A portable master controller as defined in claim 3, wherein said accelerometer generates an output signal including a static component representative of the static gravitational acceleration and a dynamic component representative of dynamic acceleration.
  • 5. A portable master controller as defined in claim 4, wherein said processing unit is operative to filter out the dynamic component.
  • 6. A portable master controller as defined in claim 4, wherein said signal output by said tilt sensor is a pulse width modulated signal.
  • 7. A portable master controller as defined in claim 3, wherein the emergency digital command signal directs the locomotive to stop.
  • 8. A portable master controller as defined in claim 3, wherein said processing unit includes a diagnostic unit to detect a malfunction of said tilt sensor.
  • 9. A portable master controller as defined in claim 8, wherein said diagnostic unit is operative to perform a proper operation procedure.
  • 10. A portable master controller as defined in claim 9, wherein said proper operation procedure implements a timer to measure a time during which said tilt sensor supplies inclination information to said processing unit indicating that an orientation of said master controller does not change.
  • 11. A portable master controller as defined in claim 10, wherein said timer defines a maximal time period, when the inclination information supplied by said tilt sensor to said processing unit indicates that the orientation of said master controller has not changed during said maximal time period, said diagnostic unit is operative to send a signal to said tilt sensor to force said tilt sensor to supply inclination information indicating a change of orientation of said master controller.
  • 12. A portable master controller as defined in claim 9 wherein said diagnostic unit is operative to perform a continued operation procedure.
  • 13. A portable master controller as defined in claim 12, wherein said tilt sensor generates an output signal indicative of the inclination information, said continued operation procedure including validating the output signal of the tilt sensor.
  • 14. A portable master controller as defined in claim 13, wherein the validation of the output signal includes observing a characteristic parameter of the output signal.
  • 15. A portable master controller as defined in claim 14, wherein the characteristic parameter of the output signal is a frequency of the output signal.
  • 16. A portable master controller as defined in claim 8, wherein when said diagnostic unit detects a malfunction of said tilt sensor, said processing unit is operative to generate an emergency digital command signal to said transmission unit without input from the operator, for directing the locomotive to acquire a secure condition.
  • 17. A remote control system for a locomotive, comprising:a) a portable master controller, including: i) a user interface for receiving commands to control movements of the locomotive from a human operator, said user interface being responsive to the commands from the human operator to generate control signals; ii) a processing unit in communication with said user interface for receiving the control signals to generate digital command signals for directing the movement of the locomotive; iii) a transmission unit in communication with said processing unit for receiving the digital command signals and for generating a RF transmission conveying the digital command signals to the slave controller; b) a solid-state tilt sensor in communication with said processing unit for supplying to said processing unit inclination information about said portable master controller, said processing unit: i) being operative to determine at least in part on the basis of the inclination information if said portable master controller is in a safe operational condition or in an unsafe operational condition; ii) when said processing unit determines that the portable master controller is in an unsafe operational condition said processing unit is operative to generate an emergency digital command signal to said transmission unit without input from the operator, for directing the locomotive to acquire a secure condition; c) a slave controller for mounting on-board the locomotive, said slave controller including: i) a receiver module for sensing the RF transmission; ii) a processing module in communication with said receiver module, said processing module being responsive to digital command signals conveyed by the RF transmission to generate local signals controlling the locomotive.
  • 18. A remote control system as defined in claim 17, wherein said solid-state tilt sensor includes an accelerometer.
  • 19. A remote control system as defined in claim 18, wherein said accelerometer responds to static gravitational acceleration.
  • 20. A remote control system as defined in claim 19, wherein said accelerometer generates an output signal including a static component representative of the static gravitational acceleration and a dynamic component representative of dynamic acceleration.
  • 21. A remote control system as defined in claim 20, wherein said processing unit is operative to filter out the dynamic component.
  • 22. A remote control system as defined in claim 20, wherein said signal output by said tilt sensor is a pulse width modulated signal.
  • 23. A remote control system as defined in claim 19, wherein the emergency digital command signal directs the locomotive to stop.
  • 24. A remote control system as defined in claim 19, wherein said processing unit includes a diagnostic unit to detect a malfunction of said tilt sensor.
  • 25. A remote control system as defined in claim 24, wherein said diagnostic unit is operative to perform a proper operation procedure.
  • 26. A remote control system as defined in claim 25, wherein said proper operation procedure implements a timer to measure a time during which said tilt sensor supplies inclination information to said processing unit indicating that an orientation of said master controller does not change.
  • 27. A remote control system as defined in claim 26, wherein said timer defines a maximal time period, when the inclination information supplied by said tilt sensor to said processing unit indicates that the orientation of said master controller has not changed during said maximal time period, said diagnostic unit is operative to send a signal to said tilt sensor to force said tilt sensor to supply inclination information indicating a change of orientation of said master controller.
  • 28. A remote control system as defined in claim 25 wherein said diagnostic unit is operative to perform a continued operation procedure.
  • 29. A remote control system as defined in claim 28, wherein said tilt sensor generates an output signal indicative of the inclination information, said continued operation procedure including validating the output signal of the tilt sensor.
  • 30. A remote control system as defined in claim 29, wherein the validation of the output signal includes observing a characteristic parameter of the output signal.
  • 31. A remote control system as defined in claim 30, wherein the characteristic parameter of the output signal is a frequency of the output signal.
  • 32. A remote control system as defined in claim 24, wherein when said diagnostic unit detects a malfunction of said tilt sensor, said processing unit is operative to generate an emergency digital command signal to said transmission unit without input from the operator, for directing the locomotive to acquire a secure condition.
  • 33. A portable master controller for a locomotive remote control system, the locomotive remote control system having a slave controller mounted on-board a locomotive, said portable master controller comprising:a) a user interface for receiving commands to control a movement of the locomotive from a human operator, said user interface being responsive to the commands from the human operator to generate control signals; b) a processing unit in communication with said user interface for receiving the control signals to generate digital command signals for directing the movement of the locomotive; c) a transmission unit in communication with said processing unit for receiving the digital command signals and for generating an RF transmission conveying the digital command signals to the slave controller; d) an accelerometer in communication with said processing unit for supplying to said processing unit inclination information about said portable master controller, said processing unit: i) being operative to determine at least in part on the basis of the inclination information if said portable master controller is in a safe operational condition or in an unsafe operational condition; ii) when said processing unit determines that the portable master controller is in an unsafe operational condition said processing unit is operative to generate an emergency digital command signal to said transmission unit without input from the operator, for directing the locomotive to acquire a secure condition.
  • 34. A remote control system for a locomotive, comprising:a) a portable master controller, including: i) a user interface for receiving commands to control movements of the locomotive from a human operator, said user interface being responsive to the commands from the human operator to generate control signals; ii) a processing unit in communication with said user interface for receiving the control signals to generate digital command signals for directing the movement of the locomotive; iii) a transmission unit in communication with said processing unit for receiving the digital command signals and for generating a RF transmission conveying the digital command signals to the slave controller; b) an accelerometer in communication with said processing unit for supplying to said processing unit inclination information about said portable master controller, said processing unit: i) being operative to determine at least in part on the basis of the inclination information if said portable master controller is in a safe operational condition or in an unsafe operational condition; ii) when said processing unit determines that the portable master controller is in an unsafe operational condition said processing unit is operative to generate an emergency digital command signal to said transmission unit without input from the operator, for directing the locomotive to acquire a secure condition; c) a slave controller for mounting on-board the locomotive, said slave controller including: i) a receiver module for sensing the RF transmission; ii) a processing module in communication with said receiver module, said processing module being responsive to digital command signals conveyed by the RF transmission to generate local signals controlling the locomotive.
US Referenced Citations (3)
Number Name Date Kind
5511749 Horst et al. Apr 1996 A
5685507 Horst et al. Nov 1997 A
5817934 Skantar Oct 1998 A
Non-Patent Literature Citations (5)
Entry
Analog Devices; Low Cost+ 2g Dual Axis; iMEMS Accelerometer with Digital Output; ADXL202; World Wide Web Site: http: www.analog.com; Analog Devices, Inc. 1998.
Weinberg et al., “Using the ADXL202 accelerometer as a multifunction sensor (tilt, vibration and shock) in car alarms,”Analog Devices -Technical Note (Aug. 1998).
Jachman, John., “Using piezoresistive accelerometers for automotive road testing,” Sensors, pp. 40-47 (May 1990).
Link, Brian, “Field-qualified silicon accelerometers: from 1 milli g to 200,200 g,” Sensors, pp. 28-33 (Mar. 1993).
Horton et al., “A dual-axis tilt sensor based on micromachined accelerometers,” Sensors, pp. 91-94 (Apr. 1996).