In automotive repair garages, many of the tools used to diagnose and repair cars have transitioned to computer-based systems. Many of these diagnostic systems include an Internet-connected, off-the-shelf diagnostic computer running an operating system such as Microsoft Windows, and contain an installed and licensed diagnostic application(s) that was developed by an automotive manufacturer, such as Ford, or a diagnostic company, such as Snap-on. These systems are increasingly complex and, in many cases, a mechanic will use a different diagnostic system for each brand of vehicle they are working on. While some mechanics may be comfortable with these new diagnostic systems, others do not have the time or interest to learn how to use them. These diagnostic systems can also be very expensive, sometimes out of reach for technicians.
There are some existing solutions to this problem. A few companies offer a paid service in which they offer a remote service to help the local mechanic use their diagnostic system. These solutions are not cost effective for technicians because both require an upfront purchase of equipment. Also, existing solutions suffer from technical short comings.
The present invention provides a remote service that may be embodied in a hardware kit that may be leased or rented to the local mechanic and shipped pre-configured with special remote software, and include a service where a remote technician performs all diagnostic functions. While the invention is embodied in a system for remote vehicle diagnostics, its principles could also be applied to a system and method for remote reprogramming of a vehicle's electronic control units.
A vehicle diagnostic system and method of performing vehicle diagnostics, according to an aspect of the invention, includes a local system that is adapted to connect with a vehicle and a remote system that is adapted to connect with the local system via an Internet. The local system has a vehicle interface and a local computer system operatively connected with the vehicle interface. The local computer system operates a diagnostic program specific to the vehicle under test. The remote system has a remote diagnostic control program. The remote diagnostic control program interfaces with the local computer system for performing a diagnostic evaluation of a vehicle under test. The remote system controls the local system to perform the diagnostic evaluation of the vehicle under test exclusive of the local system operator.
The vehicle interface may have a unique identification and the local computer system may be associated with a particular vehicle interface according to the identification of that vehicle interface. The local computer system may be a portable computer that is owned by the owner of the remote system. The remote system may be capable of enabling and disabling the local computer system. The owner of the remote system provides all maintenance on the local computer and vehicle interface. The portable computer may have a built-in Internet connection.
The local computer system may have a display and the diagnostic control program may prohibit a local operator of the local system to view progress of a diagnostic evaluation being performed with the local system. The local computer system may have a display and the diagnostic control program may allow a local operator to view progress of a diagnostic evaluation being performed with the local system.
The remote diagnostic system may push updates to the local diagnostic control computer. The diagnostic program may be adapted to perform (i) check of the status of all electronic modules of the vehicle and/or (ii) an emissions certification test of the vehicle and/or (iii) programming of modules or service procedures related to reprogramming. The remote system may include a database of common faults, indications and symptoms of common vehicle failure modes for each type of vehicle and performs an analysis of data in said database for diagnosing failure conditions in a particular type of vehicle and for providing failure statistics to vehicle manufacturers and regulators.
These and other objects, advantages and features of this invention will become apparent upon review of the following specification in conjunction with the drawings.
Referring now to the drawings and the illustrative embodiment depicted therein, a vehicle diagnostic system 20 for use with a vehicle 22 is operated by a local operator, such as a mechanic 24 using a local diagnostic computer system or local system 28 and a remote technician 26 using a remote diagnostic computer system or remote system 30 (
Local diagnostic computer 34 is operatively connected with vehicle interface 32 and includes a commercially available diagnostic application program 58 that is configured to the specific vehicle under test and a remote diagnostic assistance launcher program 60 that will be described in more detail below. Diagnostic application 58 comprises a program provided by an automotive manufacturer or a company that supplies diagnostic application programs, such as Snap-On Incorporated. In practice, computer 34 will include multiple diagnostic application programs 58 each for use with various makes and/or models of vehicles to enable local system 28 to be used with such vehicles. Alternatively, a diagnostic application program 58 may be employed for use with multiple vehicles. Local system 28 further has an Internet interface 40 to provide a communication link with remote system 30 via the Internet 42 using conventional cloud technology. In the illustrated embodiment, local diagnostic computer 34 is a portable computer having a built in Internet connection as well as a monitor and keyboard or virtual keyboard, such as a tablet device. Alternative computing devices may, however, be employed.
In the illustrated embodiment remote system 30 includes a computer 36 having a monitor, keyboard and an Internet interface 62 that allows the remote system to connect with local system 28 via Internet 42. Remote system computer 36 runs a remote diagnostic control program 38 that provides for performing a diagnostic evaluation of a vehicle under test, as will be described in more detail below. In particular, remote diagnostic control program 38 in conjunction with remote diagnostic assistance software launcher program 60 allows remote technician 26 to control local system 28 exclusive of the local system operator 24 who has no control over the local diagnostic program 58.
The vehicle diagnostic system 20 and method of performing vehicle diagnostics thus includes the local system 28 that is adapted to connect with vehicle 22, and includes remote system 30 that is adapted to connect with the local system 28 via an Internet. The local computer system 28 thus operates a diagnostic program 58 of the local system 28 specific to the vehicle 22 under test. The remote system 30 has a remote diagnostic control program 38 that interfaces with the local computer system 28 for performing a diagnostic evaluation of the vehicle 22 under test, with the remote system 30 controlling the local system 28 to perform the diagnostic evaluation exclusive of the local system operator or mechanic 24.
Remote system 30 may be made selectively available for use, such as to a local mechanic 24 at an automotive repair facility, and such as upon registration for and/or payment for the services. Referring now to
A user, such as a local mechanic 24, will connect the vehicle interface 32 with a vehicle. An example of a vehicle interface is a MONGOOSEPRO provided by Drew Technologies, Inc. of Ann Arbor, Mich. After the mechanic 24 performs a login at 69, the main menu is displayed at 70. The main menu provides the mechanic 24 with a series of features that can be launched in addition to various housekeeping functions at 71 and 72. Program 60 allows the mechanic to launch various tools at 73, such as investigating the status of various components of local system 28 at 74 or 75. Program 60 allows the local mechanic 24 to initiate either a diagnostic test routine 78 by initiating a health check function at 77 or a vehicle emission check 80 by initiating an emissions test function at 79. The functions initiated at 77 and 79 are communicated via Internet 42 to remote tech computer 36. Program 60 allows the local mechanic 24 to select at 76 a remote process program 92 used by remote technician 26 to begin a test sequence, as will be explained in more detail below, including with reference to
Referring now to
From main menu 82 of program 38, the technician 26 can perform various administrative functions including locking or unlocking at 85 vehicle interface 32 or remote computer 60 to allow control over these devices, such as due to non-payment or other reason. From main menu 82, the technician 26 may also schedule appointments at 91A, such as may be requested by a mechanic 24. Technician 26 may also perform queries or research via program 38, such as looking up information regarding customers at 91B, and/or search for information regarding a particular local computer system 34 at 91C, including with the ability to send messages to a particular local computer 34.
Still further, from main menu 82 the remote technician 26 can launch a diagnostic health check 78 (
As noted, a remote testing program 92, shown in
If the remote technician 26 is ready to begin a remote diagnostic session, a start session selection is made at 103 (
With further reference to
As illustrated in
Referring now to
Manager software program 140 additionally allows review of and action to be taken with regard to billing issues at 142, such as suspending accounts for customers that are in arrears, issuing refunds, and updating customer payment information. Program 140 additionally enables, such as at 143, accounts for new technicians 26 to be created, or to delete or suspend the account of a technician 26. For example, the owner or operator of system 20 may enable third party technicians 26 to utilize system 20. As also illustrated, program 140 additionally enables system backups to be performed and reviewed.
Referring now to
Referring now to
Thus, it can be seen that the present invention is embodied in a remote diagnostic system including a hardware kit that is leased or rented to the local mechanic and shipped pre-configured, special remote software, and a service where a remote technician performs all diagnostic functions. A computer or tablet is provided with a commercial-operating system onsite with the local mechanic that completely allows the remote technician access to perform diagnostics and programming, but the local mechanic is not given access to control or interfere with the diagnostic software or process (except for perhaps unplugging the system). The local mechanic also cannot monitor or see what is transpiring on screen unless the local mechanic is placed in a group that allows for such monitoring. In such group, the local mechanic is not given access or control to interfere with the diagnostics process, but has the ability to monitor or see the process as it is occurring. This application could even pop up labels or descriptions as to the in-progress steps as they happen. This might help the local mechanic to understand what is involved in the process.
The local computer system may be rented or leased to the local mechanic at a low cost. The local mechanic does not need to purchase a system. The mechanic can simply lease it until they are done using it. The revenue can be collected by charging per-incident fees instead of requiring an upfront tool purchase or high lease payment. The local computer system may include an installed Internet connection that is pre-configured (such as 3G/4G) so the local mechanic does not have to install their own Internet connection or configure it to connect to a hot spot. Upon power up, the local system will automatically connect to the Internet. Because the local mechanic is leased the computer, the local mechanic does not need to obtain a license to use the local software included in diagnostic system 20. The local mechanic is supplied the licensed programmed machine. There are no further obligations in addition to making lease payments and per-use fees.
Since the pre-configured system is setup and ready to go, there is no risk of use of out-of-date or unlicensed (pirated) diagnostic software. Local computer system 34 will be kept properly licensed, configured, and up to date. The diagnostic system 20 can be tightly monitored and controlled with the system properly maintained and all automatic updates provided. Whenever a determination is made that there is a software update that is required for any diagnostic application, operating system, or hardware driver, the update can be “pushed” to all customers in an efficient and controlled way that does not require the local mechanic to interact. Updates that might negatively affect proper functioning of the computer or the diagnostic applications will be withheld.
Diagnostic system 20 may include built-in billing methods used by the local technician. When a remote diagnostic service is performed, it can automatically be charged to the credit card of the vehicle owner or local mechanic and the invoice automatically generated. A scheduler function may be provided in which the local mechanic can setup an appointment for the remote diagnostics service based on the next available slot or for a future time when he expects the vehicle to be ready for testing.
An emissions compliance test may be performed by diagnostic system 20 and carried out by the remote technician in the manner previously set forth with respect to diagnostic tests. An OBD health check may be incorporated into this diagnostic system 20 where this test is conducted by a remote technician and the status of all modules in the vehicle are printed on a health report for the customer or local mechanic. A locking feature may be provided in which components of the vehicle diagnostics system can be remotely locked in the event that the local mechanic's account becomes delinquent or the components are stolen. An insurance feature may be provided in order to have insurance cover any expense if the diagnostics or programming procedures are unsuccessful. This insurance would cover all costs to repair the vehicle, including towing, parts, and third party service fees.
Thus, it can be seen that the present invention is embodied in a diagnostic system and method that is superior to previously proposed techniques. For example, a prior art system is shown in
Another prior art system is shown in
While the foregoing description describes several embodiments of the present invention, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that variations and modifications to these embodiments may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention, as defined in the claims below. The present invention encompasses all combinations of various embodiments or aspects of the invention described herein. It is understood that any and all embodiments of the present invention may be taken in conjunction with any other embodiment to describe additional embodiments of the present invention. Furthermore, any elements of an embodiment may be combined with any and all other elements of any of the embodiments to describe additional embodiments.
The present application claims priority of U.S. provisional application Ser. No. 62/305,699 filed Mar. 9, 2016, which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5491418 | Alfaro et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
6122575 | Schmidt | Sep 2000 | A |
6154658 | Caci | Nov 2000 | A |
6728603 | Pruzan | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6879894 | Lightner | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6928349 | Namaky et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6956501 | Kitson | Oct 2005 | B2 |
7092803 | Kapolka et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7373226 | Cancilla | May 2008 | B1 |
7502672 | Kolls | Mar 2009 | B1 |
7519458 | Buckley | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7532962 | Lowrey | May 2009 | B1 |
7584030 | Graham | Sep 2009 | B1 |
7786851 | Drew et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7840812 | Levenberg | Nov 2010 | B1 |
7928837 | Drew et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8190322 | Lin et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8258936 | Mahalingaiah | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8306687 | Chen | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8339254 | Drew et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8352577 | Martone | Jan 2013 | B2 |
D675568 | Drew et al. | Feb 2013 | S |
8514825 | Addepalli | Aug 2013 | B1 |
8589020 | Angus | Nov 2013 | B1 |
8638207 | Drew et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8640228 | Croize | Jan 2014 | B2 |
D701832 | Drew et al. | Apr 2014 | S |
8688313 | Margol | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8825276 | Lake | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8848608 | Addepalli | Sep 2014 | B1 |
D718201 | Drew et al. | Nov 2014 | S |
8909416 | Chen | Dec 2014 | B2 |
D725519 | Drew et al. | Mar 2015 | S |
8977423 | Merg | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8989958 | Ric | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9002554 | Chen | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9141830 | Uczekaj | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9266626 | Cheriere | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9407635 | Angus | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9475590 | Buehler | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9507982 | Mylaraswamy | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9530255 | Drew | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9563988 | Drew et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9637244 | Wischmeyer | May 2017 | B2 |
9857430 | Kallfelz | Jan 2018 | B2 |
10013816 | Nassar et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10109119 | Keane | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10181225 | Liebl | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10282924 | Drew et al. | May 2019 | B2 |
20030001720 | Wade et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030020759 | Cancilla | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20040044454 | Ross et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040106404 | Gould | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040167689 | Bromley et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20050021294 | Trsar et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050038581 | Kapolka | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050060070 | Kapolka et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050171661 | Abdel-Malek | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050182537 | Tefft et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050240555 | Wilde | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050251304 | Cancellara et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060052921 | Bodin et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060106508 | Liebl | May 2006 | A1 |
20060202862 | Ratnakar | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060211446 | Wittmann et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060217855 | Chinnadurai et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070005201 | Chenn | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070010923 | Rouyre | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070043488 | Avery et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070050105 | Chinnadurai | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070055420 | Krzystofczyk et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070073460 | Bertosa et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070112576 | Avery | May 2007 | A1 |
20070185624 | Duddles | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070233340 | Raichle et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080177438 | Chen | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080269975 | Bertosa et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080280602 | Ban | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090062978 | Picard | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090077626 | Leclercq | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090112569 | Angus | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090119657 | Link, II | May 2009 | A1 |
20090138874 | Beck | May 2009 | A1 |
20090187976 | Perroud | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090192659 | Beebe | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090259358 | Andreasen | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090265055 | Gillies | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090276115 | Chen | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090326757 | Andreasen | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100174446 | Andreasen | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100262335 | Brozovich | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110071709 | Damiani | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110153150 | Drew et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110276218 | Dwan | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110313593 | Cohen | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120046826 | Panko | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120182935 | Addepalli | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120215491 | Theriot | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120254345 | Montoya | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130159466 | Mao | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130305391 | Haukom | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140086242 | Drew et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140121894 | Drew et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140121937 | Drew et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140172230 | Drew | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140297099 | Drew | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140309905 | Drew | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150161618 | Angus | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20160070559 | West | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160071331 | Angus | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160110937 | Berglund | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160300402 | Nassar | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160364224 | Tuukkanen | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170024942 | Drew | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170172397 | Zardini | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170186248 | Fournier | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170242680 | Angus | Aug 2017 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Commonly assigned co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/651,351, filed Jul. 17, 2017, entitled Vehicle Diagnostic and Programming Device and Method. |
Commonly assigned co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/485,531, filed Apr. 12, 2017, entitled Vehicle Programming and Diagnostic Device With Integrated Battery Charger. |
Commonly assigned co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/485,643, filed Apr. 12, 2017, entitled Battery Charger With Projecting Members. |
Commonly assigned co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 29/600,447, filed Apr. 12, 2017, entitled Vehicle Diagnostic Device. |
Article entitled “Remote Vehicle Diagnostic System Using Mobile Handsets” by Doo-Hee Jung, Gu-Min Jeong, and Hyun-Sik Ahn, understood to be from the proceedings of the Jun. 2006 International Conference on Wireless Networks, ICWN 2006, Las Vegas, Nevada. |
Thesis entitled “Remote Connection of Diagnostic Tool” by Irina-Elena Apetri and Ali Raza, Chalmers University of Technology, dated 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/245,641, as filed on Sep. 26, 2011, entitled Remote Diagnostic System for Vehicles, inventors Robert U. Beckmann, Michael Kirlauski and Andrew Woodard. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/353,809, as filed on Nov. 17, 2016, entitled Device and Method to Measure and Ensure Compliance With Vehicle Recalls or Mandatory Service Updates, claiming priority to Dec. 1, 2015, inventors Thomas Fournier, Lothar Geilen and Brian Herron. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62305699 | Mar 2016 | US |