The present invention generally relates to the field of computer-assisted surgery, and more specifically to a system and method to remotely mentor an end-user of a medical device during computer-assisted surgery.
Training a surgeon and their medical team with a new and complex medical device is both time consuming and requires on-site trainers in the operating room (OR) for several procedures. Depending on the complexity of the device, an experienced mentor (i.e., a user, surgeon, or trainer having extensive experience using the device) is recommended to train the new user. This is especially the case in robotic surgery, where the new user requires several days of training and supervised patient cases before becoming proficient with the device. When a new device is first released on the market or when there are only a few devices in the field, the number of experienced mentors is low. Thus, the mentors usually have to travel long distances and expense their time to train new users in the OR and repeat the inefficient travel to the next treating OR. This travel and training time also hinders the manufacturer's ability to globally release the product in an efficient time frame.
In other situations, a first experienced end-user may simply want to obtain additional advice from a second experienced end-user. The first end-user may want to learn additional skills with the device, obtain a second opinion for a particular patient case, or discuss possible innovations using the device. For example, an end-user may be capable of proficiently executing a standard total hip arthroplasty (THA) with no complications. However, if the end-user has a patient with severe hip dysplasia, the end-user may want to consult with a mentor having experience with hip dysplasia cases. The end-user may even want to have the mentor available during the procedure. In such a situation, the mentor has to either provide advice to the end-user prior to the procedure, or travel to the location of the patient and physically be present in the OR.
Finally, with respect to robotic surgery, the end-user must have the ability to pause or stop the robotic arm at any point during the procedure. Even though robotic devices are designed with several fail-safe mechanisms, the end-user must always supervise and have complete control of the robotic device. Control of the robotic device is typically accomplished using an input device (e.g., pendant, controller, joystick) that allows the user to immediately remove power to the robotic arm, among other functions. This is an important safety requirement for any robotic system. If the end-user is being trained by a mentor, the mentor should also have the ability to control or remove power from the device, which requires the physical presence of the mentor in the OR.
Thus there is a need in the art for a system and method that permits a mentor to remotely observe, train, or mentor an end-user of a medical device. There is a further need for the remote mentor to have the ability to control or quickly cut power to the device.
A remote mentoring system is provided that includes a medical device located in an operating room (OR), and a remote mentoring station located outside the OR having a remote display of the medical device and a remote input device. A network connection provides the remote mentoring station with observation of the medical device and communication to the OR thereby enabling a mentor to provide an end-user of the medical device instruction and to provide the remote mentor using the remote mentoring station control to the medical device via the remote mentoring station.
A method of using a remote mentoring system for conducting medical procedures is provided. The method includes connecting the remote mentor station outside an operating room to the medical device in the operating room (OR), and using the remote mentor station to communicate with and control the medical device.
The present invention is further detailed with respect to the following drawings that are intended to show certain aspects of the present of invention, but should not be construed as limit on the practice of the invention, wherein:
The present invention has utility as a system and method that permits a mentor to remotely observe, train, or mentor an end-user of a medical device. Embodiments of the present invention allow the remote mentor to observe and take control, if necessary, of a medical device during the surgical procedure from a remote location using a network connection. Therefore, new end-users, or end-users requiring assistance, may obtain feedback directly from the mentor in real-time. Specifically, the remote mentor may remove power from the medical device at any time to provide assistance or recommendations to the end-user. The remote mentor can then re-activate the power, or allow the device to re-power, after assessing the situation. The following description of the various embodiments of the invention is not intended to limit the invention to these specific embodiments, but rather to enable any person skilled in the art to make and use the invention through exemplary aspects thereof.
As used herein, a medical device is to encompass any device used in a surgical operation or used in the diagnostics of a patient or subject. In particular embodiments, the medical devices are computer-assisted surgical systems including, but not limited to a hand-held surgical system having 1, 2, . . . N degrees of freedom as to movement, an autonomous serial-chain manipulator system, a haptic serial-chain manipulator system, a parallel robotic system, a master-slave robotic system, or navigated surgical instruments, such as those described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,086,401, 7,206,626, 8,876,830, 8,961,563, U.S. Pat. App. No. 2013/0060278, and PCT Intl. App. No. US2015/051713. Examples of robotic systems particularly useful with embodiments of the invention include The TSolution One® Surgical System (THINK Surgical, Fremont, Calif.), the RIO® Robotic Arm Interactive Orthopedic System (Stryker-Mako, Ft. Lauderdale, Fla.), the ROSA™ Robotic Device (Zimmer-Medtech, Montpellier, France), and other robotic surgical systems having an electromechanical arm.
While depicted in the following drawings as a single OR, it is appreciated that in some inventive embodiments, a monitor station is coupled to a plurality of ORs, thereby allowing a remote mentor to be available as a resource during multiple medical procedures, simultaneously or sequentially, using the medical device. This is exploited as a business method, in which the remote mentor access is provided for financial remuneration as a consultant during the planning of a procedure involving the medical device, during the procedure, or post-operatively.
Referring now to the figures,
In a particular embodiment, the operating room 100 includes an OR network controller 114, a medical device 116, an OR camera 118, an OR input device 120, and the end-user 122. The network connection 104 transmits data between the mentor station 102 and the operating room 100. The medical device 116 selectively engaging a surgical field of a patient. In a particular embodiment, the network connection 104 is any type of known network including a fixed wire line network, cable and fiber optics, over the air broadcasts, satellite, local area network (LAN), wide area network (WAN), global network (e.g., Internet), intranet, etc. that have high transmission data rates and low latency. Additional forms of network connections are also viable including wireless data transfer with Wi-Fi and Bluetooth, or wired data transfer such as an Ethernet line. In some inventive embodiments, a redundant network connection 104′ is provided to mitigate a network outage during a surgical procedure in the OR 100. The redundant network connection 104′ ideally being on a separate carrier to harden the connection against an outage of a given network. However, it will become apparent that the data rates and latency between the OR 100 and the mentor station 102 are important in certain embodiments.
The mentor station 102 may be located in the same hospital as the OR 100 or located as far away as another country. The OR network controller 114 and remote network controller 106 process and control the incoming and outgoing data. In a particular embodiment, the OR camera 118 (e.g., CCD, CMOS, or other video camera imaging source) provides a live-feed to the remote display 108 (e.g., video monitor, computer monitor, tablet display, smartphone, and the like). The remote mentor 112 may then watch the procedure in real-time on the remote display 108. In a specific embodiment, the remote mentor 112 may provide input to the medical device 116 using an input device 110. In a specific embodiment, the input device 110 is a single button that allows the remote mentor 112 to remove power from the medical device 116 as further described below. The use of a single button or other touch sensitive control as the input device 110 allows the mentor to only have the ability to stop the procedure and provide feedback to the end-user 122 without taking complete control over the device. This is more akin to a traditional mentoring approach (i.e., stop and teach), rather than having the mentor perform the actual surgery (i.e., take full control of the device). However, it should be appreciated that the input device 110 may have additional inputs to control the medical device 116. For example, the input device 110 may include a joystick, a mouse, a pendant, a keyboard, a foot pedal, or a specifically designed input device having several buttons for controlling several different functions of the device (i.e., a space mouse). In a specific embodiment, the input device 110 may be integrated with the display device 108 as a touchscreen with the ability to enter commands via the display screen. In other inventive embodiments, the mentor has a stereoscopic display that provides a field of view depth that appears 3-dimensional. In still other embodiments, the mentor manual input device provides haptic feedback as the medical device 116 interacts with patient tissue.
The end-user 122 also has control over the medical device 116 via the OR input device 120. In a particular embodiment, the OR input device 120 has additional functionality than that of the remote input device 110. Therefore, in this particular embodiment the end-user 122 has greater control over the medical device 116 and the procedure in general. In another embodiment, the OR input device 120 and the remote input device 110 are identical. In a specific embodiment, safety mechanisms are employed in the event the network connection is lost. In such an event, the end-user 122 would take full control over the medical device 116 for safety and disconnect any inputs from the remote mentor 112.
In a specific embodiment, the medical device 116 has direct network connection capabilities (Internet communication), wherein the network controller 114 is essentially embodied within the medical device 116.
With reference to
With reference to
The OR display 142 is in communication, by a wired or wireless connection, to the medical device 116, such as the robot 128 of
While at least one exemplary embodiment has been presented in the foregoing detailed description, it should be appreciated that a vast number of variations exist. It should also be appreciated that the exemplary embodiment or exemplary embodiments are only examples, and are not intended to limit the scope, applicability, or configuration of the described embodiments in any way. Rather, the foregoing detailed description will provide those skilled in the art with a convenient roadmap for implementing the exemplary embodiment or exemplary embodiments. It should be understood that various changes may be made in the function and arrangement of elements without departing from the scope as set forth in the appended claims and the legal equivalents thereof.
This application claims priority of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/420,028 filed Nov. 10, 2016 entitled “REMOTE MENTORING STATION”, the entire contents of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2017/060313 | 11/7/2017 | WO | 00 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62420028 | Nov 2016 | US |