The present disclosure relates to the field of remote network monitoring and controlling of the status of a movable barrier, more particularly to the initial determination of the open/close status of a garage door and the subsequent wireless transmission, via the Internet, of such status to an Internet access device such as a user's handheld Smartphone, and even more particularly, in response to the receipt of such garage door status, the transmission, via the Internet, of a change-of-door-status command to move the garage door in compliance with such command.
Movable barriers, such as upward-acting sectional or single panel garage doors, residential and commercial rollup doors, and slidable and swingable gates, are used to alternatively allow and restrict entry to building structures and property. These barriers are driven between their respective open and closed positions by motors or other motion-imparting mechanisms, which are themselves controlled by barrier moving units, sometimes referred to as “movable barrier operators,” and in the specific case of a door, as “door operators,” and in the even more specific case of a garage door, as “garage door operators.” Garage door operators are effective to cause the DC or AC motor, and accompanying motor drive assembly, to move the associated garage door, typically between its open and closed positions.
Each garage door operator includes a door controller (typically, a microprocessor, microcontroller, or other programmable platform) for processing incoming door commands and generating output control signals to the motor which, in combination with its associated drive assembly, moves the garage door in accordance with the incoming door commands. The incoming door commands, in the past, have been in the form of wired or wireless signals transmitted from interior or exterior wall consoles, or from proximately located hand held or vehicle mounted RF transmitters.
However, with the near ubiquity of the Internet and the proliferation of electronic devices and equipment designed to access the Internet, such as personal computers, cellphones, and Smartphones, systems are currently being designed and implemented in the trade that enable non-proximate, or remote, monitoring and control, via the Internet, of door status. For example, if a homeowner is not in proximity to its residence, and wants to determine whether the garage door the homeowner had intended to close, did in fact close, or whether the garage door it intended to leave open for a workman to enter, had in fact been left open, using one of these systems, the homeowner can, through access to the Internet, remotely monitor the status of the garage door (e.g., whether it is open or closed). Moreover, if the garage door is not in the desired position, these systems are designed to also enable the homeowner to transmit change-of-door status commands over the Internet to move the garage door to the desired position, all without having to be physically proximate the garage to do so.
These aforestated systems typically use means capable of determining the status of the garage door that is then remotely transmitted to the homeowner. For example, some systems use door status monitoring apparatus affixed to, or proximate, the garage door to directly monitor the garage door status. While this approach is generally acceptable for many applications, the requirement to have separate apparatus affixed to, or proximate, the garage door may, for various reasons, not be the most desired approach. Other systems have indirectly determined door status from the door controller of the garage door operator (i.e., from the microprocessor, microcontroller or other programmable platform of the garage door opener). However, these systems have not been entirely acceptable for all conditions of service.
It is therefore among the objectives of the embodiments of the remote door status monitoring and control system and method disclosed herein to present a new and improved version of such system and method that is reliable, takes advantage of Internet signal transmission, and is convenient to install and use.
In accordance with the aforementioned and other objectives, disclosed herein are alternative embodiments of a remote movable barrier status monitoring and control system and method that enables the initial accurate determination of the status of a movable barrier (e.g., the garage door), such status typically being whether the door is open or closed, or closed or not closed, followed by the effective transmission of that door status, via the Internet, to the user of an Internet access device, like a Smartphone, so as to enable the user to remotely monitor the movable barrier status. Among the advantages of the herein described system and method is that the barrier status determination (i.e., the monitoring operation) is carried out (i) without the requirement of barrier monitoring apparatus physically attached to, or proximate, the monitored movable barrier (e.g., the garage door), and (ii) without having to obtain garage door status information from the garage door operator, nor particularly from the programmable platform controller of the garage door operator. Instead, the status determination operation of the present invention is derived from the operation of the motor that drives the garage door.
Accordingly, the disclosed system and method incorporating the principles of the present invention (i) initially produces motor signal pulses indicative of the extent and direction of rotation of the rotatable shaft of the motor associated with the monitored movable barrier, and therefore the extent and direction of travel of the movable barrier itself; and (ii) thereafter, pursuant to the programmable-controlled operation by a microprocessor, microcontroller, or the like in the door control module, these motor signal pulses are converted to digital signals indicative of the open/closed or other desired status of the movable barrier. Such digital door status signals are thereafter wirelessly transmitted by the door control module, via the Internet, to the remotely located Smartphone, or other suitable Internet access device.
Thereafter, in accordance with the control aspect of the hereindescribed remote status monitoring and control system, should it be determined that the status of the movable barrier (i.e., the garage door) should be changed (for example, from open to closed), the user of the Smartphone transmits a change-of-door status command back to the door control module, via the Internet, the door control module thereafter transmitting such command to the garage door operator, specifically the programmable platform controller, that then responsively directs the motor to move the garage door to the status (i.e., position) instructed by the change-of-door-status command. Thus, the garage door operator controller plays no role in determining the status of the garage door, its sole door-related function in the overall system of this invention being to transmit remotely (or locally) transmitted door movement commands to the motor.
Pursuant to alternate embodiments of the status determination portion of the disclosed system, motor signal pulses are initially generated by an encoder responsive to the rotational movement of the rotatable output shaft of the motor driving the garage door, the encoder producing motor signal pulses corresponding to the extent and direction of such rotational (angular) movement, and therefore corresponding to the extent and direction of movement of the door.
In accordance with one preferred embodiment of an encoder, the design and operation of which are subsequently described in greater detail, the generation of the motor signal pulses is provided by a rotary optical encoder that produces optical pulses corresponding to the extent and direction of rotation of the motor shaft, and therefore the extent and direction of door movement. This optical encoder includes a wheel attached to the rotatable output shaft of the motor and has spaced paddles projecting therefrom. The spaces or “gaps” between the paddles permit the selective passage of light therethrough, the light emanating from a light “transmitter” directing its light rays toward a light sensor or “receiver,” dual optical pulse generators radially offset from one another a prescribed distance include respective sets of a light transmitter and light receiver, with the gapped wheel, rotating with the rotation of the motor shaft, disposed between a light transmitter and light receiver. The resulting pattern of light impingement on the light receivers, coupled with the angular displacement of the optical pulse generators, result in the generation of optical pulses indicative of the extent and direction of rotation of the motor shaft, and therefore the extent and direction of movement of the garage door within its travel limits. A phototransistor, forming part of the encoder, then converts these optical motor signal pulses to electrical motor signal pulses.
In accordance with a unique feature of the disclosed system, buffered ones of the electrical motor signal pulses are then routed to a microprocessor (or other programmable platform) of the door control module, where they are programmably processed/converted to digital signals indicative of the alternate status of the garage door, typically the open or closed status thereof.
Additional features, aspects, and objectives of the disclosed embodiments of the new and improved remote movable barrier status monitoring and control system and method will become readily apparent to those skilled in the art from the hereinafter detailed description, read in conjunction with the following drawings.
Embodiments of the remote movable barrier status monitoring and control system in accordance with the principles of the present invention, as defined solely by the appended claims, will be described below. These described embodiments are only non-limiting examples of implementations of the invention as defined solely by the attached claims. Additionally, in an effort to provide a focus of the description of important features of the disclosed embodiments emphasizing the principles of the present invention, some details that may be incorporated, or may prefer to be incorporated, in a commercial implementation of the hereindescribed system, but are not necessary for an understanding of the invention by one skilled in the art, have been omitted in order to highlight the important features relevant to an understanding of the invention. Also, the accompanying drawing figures are not necessarily to scale and certain elements may be shown in generalized, schematic or block diagram format in the interest of clarity and conciseness.
With initial reference now to
The motor 167 is operatively coupled to a conventional drive assembly 196, the motor 167 and drive assembly 196 effective to impart movement to the door 195 in accordance with door commands remotely and/or proximately transmitted to garage door operator 180 and thereafter to motor 167. The drive assembly 196 may be any of the standard and conventional drive assemblies available on the market that are suitable to move the garage door 195 in response to motor 167.
In accordance with the overall operation of the garage door status monitoring and control system 10, the motor signal pulses, generated to correspond to the operation of motor 167, and specifically indicative of the extent and direction of motor shaft rotation, and therefore the extent and direction (up or down) of garage door 195, are conductively transmitted by wire to the door control module 150, the design and operation of which are subsequently described with reference to
The door control module 150 is effective to process and convert the incoming motor signal pulses to digital door status signals indicative of the garage door status, for example “open/closed” or “closed/not closed” status, of the garage door 195. This door status information is then wirelessly transmitted by the door control module 150, via a WiFi home router 94, to (and for storage in) cloud server 92 of the Internet 93, where such status information is subsequently pushed to a Smartphone 90, or any other suitable Internet access device, such as a desktop or laptop computer, personal data assistant (PDA), mobile phone, tablet, or the like, for user review of the then current garage door status. It is emphasized that nowhere in system 10 is door status ever requested, the door status information always being “pushed” to the next component or stage.
With continuing reference to
Upon receipt of the remotely generated change-of-door-status command, door control module 150 is effective to transmit the change-of-door-status (and corresponding light) commands to the garage door operator 180, specifically to the door controller 183 (
Referring now to
Referring initially to
As illustrated in
The electrical pulses are subsequently routed via opto connector 187 (which connects the encoder 166 with the GDO board) to and through input buffers 186 and, in turn, as electrical pulses Opto I and Opto-Q, are routed through input buffers 161 of door control module 150 (
With continuing reference to
The transceiver 151 of door control module 150 is effective to receive any remotely generated change-of-door-status command, such command then routed to microprocessor 155. After the change-of-door-status command is compared with the door status information previously stored in microprocessor 155, to assure that the change-of-door-status made the subject of the incoming command is not the same as the previously stored status, the incoming change-of-door-status command is then routed by microprocessor 155 (in direction of downwardly pointed arrow) to microprocessor 157.
The microprocessor 157 then routes the change-of-door-status command, via the door command generator 160 of the door control module 150, and via the input circuitry 184 of the garage door operator 180 (
However, prior to the microprocessor 157 routing the change-of-door-status command to the door controller 183, the microprocessor 157 activates the piezo sounder 154 and light interface circuitry 159 to respectively sound the on board buzzer and flash the worklight 198, to warn anyone near the garage door of the imminent unattended movement of the garage door 195. Thus, when the microprocessor 157 receives the command to move the door 195, an annunciation period begins, during which the piezo sounder 154 and flashing light 198 are activated at the rate and duration in compliance with UL325 requirements. After this annunciation period has expired, the microprocessor 157 then transmits the change-of-door-status command to the door controller 183.
In accordance with the preferred embodiment of the rotary optical encoder 166, reference now is to
As best illustrated in
Thus, the identically sized and spaced paddles 170 provide for the generation of evenly spaced optical pulses of the same pulse length, with the paddle 171 providing a light pulse after a shorter interval. While the spacing between paddles may be in accordance with whatever output is desired, in the preferred embodiment shown (and best illustrated in
As best illustrated in
The processing of the motor signal pulses from the encoder 166 may be in accordance with programmable software executed by microprocessor 157. For example, the processing algorithms of such software may be directed to reliably performing the task of determining the location of the close limit and tracking position to determine when the garage door is in sufficient proximity to that close limit to declare the door as being “closed.” All other detected positions of the door may then be declared as “not closed”, or “open.” Thus, the microprocessor 157, under control of the algorithm of the software, may infer, from the motor signal pulse inputs, that it has run in one direction for a predetermined minimum time and then stopped, that the door is away from the other limit. Therefore, if the door runs upwardly and then stops, the determination is that it is not at the close limit. Another algorithm may then be used to confirm that finding. Thus, microprocessor 157, under control of that algorithm, may record that the minimum and maximum positions that are detected are the working limits.
Thus, in accordance with the monitoring aspect of the system 10 that determines the existing door status, the microprocessor 157 interprets the motor signal pulses (i.e., the electrical pulses routed from the input buffers 161 when using a rotary optical encoder) in order to determine the status of the barrier 195. For example, if the first pattern of motor signal pulses are generated (as a consequence of the clockwise rotation of the motor shaft), then the microprocessor 157 interprets the incoming electrical pulses to indicate that the door 195 has moved in the open direction. If the second pattern of motor signal pulses are generated (as a consequence of the counterclockwise rotation of the motor shaft), then the microprocessor 157 interprets the incoming electrical pulses to indicate that the door 195 has moved in the closed direction.
In summary, the microprocessor 157 may be programmed to use a variety of methods to determine whether the door 195 is closed or not closed, or closed or open. Thus, in accordance with programming of one method, or algorithm, if the pattern of electrical pulses includes at least a predetermined threshold number of pulses, the microprocessor 157 may then interpret the door 195 to be “closed.” Conversely, if the pattern of electrical pulses includes less than the predetermined threshold number of pulses, the microprocessor 157 interprets the barrier to be not closed or open.
As another example, the microprocessor 157 may be programmed to interpret a first pattern of electrical pulses inputted therein, for a predetermined first threshold of time, to mean that the door 195 has moved in the open direction, and is not closed, and to interpret a second pattern of pulses, for a second predetermined threshold of time, to mean that the door 195 is fully closed.
These predetermined threshold periods of time may be user input from the smartphone 90, which then transmits the periods via the Internet, to the microprocessor 157 over the Internet 93/Cloud 92. Alternatively, the predetermined threshold periods of time may be factory programmed into microprocessor 157.
The microprocessor 157 may use the presence or absence of the electrical pulses to verify proper operation. For example, if pulses are not received at the anticipated intervals, then an error has occurred that may mean that the door 195 is stuck. In accordance with a feature of some embodiments of system 10, if errors are detected, the barrier opener system 10 may stop the door 195 or cause it to stop and reverse direction of travel.
In accordance with another feature of the system 10, electrical power is provided by power supply 181 not only to the garage door operator (GDO) 180, but also to the door control module 150 after conversion to a suitable voltage level by the DC/DC converter 156. The primary power supplied is 16 VAC, with a secondary 13.8 VDC line from a battery. The door control module 150 and garage door operator 180 share a common ground. It should be noted that in instances where the door control module 150 is operating on the 13.8 VDC line, the processor 155 may be shut down to conserve power.
Various type apparatus may be used for the pulse encoder 166. For example, an absolute position sensor may be used to detect the angular position of the rotatable motor shaft. An example of a suitable absolute position sensor that can be used as a magnetic pulse generator for pulse encoder 166 is described in U.S. Pat. No. 8,113,263, to Reed et al., issued Feb. 14, 2012, and entitled Barrier Operator With Magnetic Position Sensor, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Various modifications may be made to the disclosed embodiments without departing from the principles of the present invention. For example, while the specific examples set forth above describe transmitting the door status information, or transmitting the change-of-door-status command, via a separate Wi-Fi home router 94, it should be understood that this is a non-limiting example, and the router 94 may alternatively be part of the Internet 93.
Moreover, those skilled in the art, having benefit of this disclosure, will appreciate that other embodiments can be envisioned that do not depart from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined solely by the attached claims, and equivalents thereof.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Nos. 62/505,711 and 62/513,943, both titled “REMOTE NETWORK MONITORING AND CONTROL OF A MOVABLE BARRIER” filed May 12, 2017, and Jun. 1, 2017, respectively, both of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety for all purposes.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3262105 | Bell | Jul 1966 | A |
4338553 | Scott, Jr. | Jul 1982 | A |
5039925 | Schap | Aug 1991 | A |
6229276 | Fitzgibbon et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6376832 | Smith et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6495983 | Stern | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6998977 | Gregori et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7071813 | Fitzgibbon | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7224275 | Fitzgibbon | May 2007 | B2 |
8587404 | Laird | Nov 2013 | B2 |
20060197481 | Hotto | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20100127882 | Sitarski | May 2010 | A1 |
20150084779 | Saladin | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20160281411 | Calagaz, Jr. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
707464 | Jul 2014 | CH |
2006066213 | Jun 2006 | WO |
Entry |
---|
European Search Report in corresponding European Patent Application No. 18171888.3, dated Oct. 1, 2018, 9 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180330605 A1 | Nov 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62513943 | Jun 2017 | US | |
62505711 | May 2017 | US |