The disclosure relates generally to a method and system for managing the operation of a plant, such as a chemical plant or a petrochemical plant or a refinery, and more particularly to a method for improving the performance of components that make up operations in a plant.
A plant or refinery may include fired heaters for heating process streams. Fired heaters may be subject to various problems. Equipment may break down over time, and need to be repaired or replaced. Additionally, a process may be more or less efficient depending on one or more operating characteristics. There will always be a need for improving process efficiencies and improving equipment reliability.
The following summary presents a simplified summary of certain features. The summary is not an extensive overview and is not intended to identify key or critical elements.
One or more embodiments may include a system including a plant that includes a fired heater unit, one or more sensors configured to measure operating information for the fired heater unit of the plant, a data collection platform, a data analysis platform, and/or a control platform. The data collection platform may include one or more processors of the data collection platform; a communication interface of the data collection platform and in communication with the one or more sensors; and non-transitory computer-readable memory storing executable instructions that, when executed, cause the data collection platform to: receive sensor data comprising the operating information for the fired heater unit of the plant; correlate the sensor data with time data; and transmit the sensor data. The data analysis platform may include one or more processors of the data analysis platform; non-transitory computer-readable memory storing executable instructions that, when executed, cause the data analysis platform to: receive the sensor data from the data collection platform; analyze the sensor data to determine fuel input information for the plant, air information for the plant, and emissions information for the plant; based on the fuel input information for the plant, the air information for the plant, and the emissions information for the plant, determine an adjustment to an operating parameter of the plant to reduce energy consumption of the plant; and transmit a command configured to cause the adjustment to the operating parameter of the plant. The control platform may include one or more processors of the control platform; non-transitory computer-readable memory storing executable instructions that, when executed, cause the control platform to: receive the command for the adjustment to the operating parameter of the plant; and adjust the operating parameter of the plant.
One or more embodiments may include non-transitory computer-readable media storing executable instructions that, when executed by one or more processors, cause a system to: receive sensor data comprising operating information for a fired heater unit of a plant; analyze the sensor data to determine fuel input information for the plant, air information for the plant, and emissions information for the plant; based on the fuel input information for the plant, the air information for the plant, and the emissions information for the plant, determine an adjustment to an operating parameter of the plant to reduce energy consumption of the plant; and transmit a command configured to cause the adjustment to the operating parameter of the plant.
One or more embodiments may include a method including receiving, by a data analysis computing device, sensor data for a sensor associated with a fired heater unit of a plant; based on analyzing the sensor data, determining, by the data analysis computing device, a current operating condition for an element of the fired heater unit; determining, by the data analysis computing device, a difference between the current operating condition for the element of the fired heater unit and a design operating condition for the element of the fired heater unit; based on the analyzed sensor data, determining, by the data analysis computing device, a command for adjusting the element of the fired heater unit to reduce the difference between the current operating condition and the design operating condition for the element of the fired heater unit; causing, by the data analysis computing device, display of the difference between the current operating condition and the design operating condition on a dashboard outlining recommendations for adjusting the element of the fired heater unit to reduce the difference between the current operating condition and the design operating condition for the element of the fired heater unit; and sending the command for adjusting the element of the fired heater unit to reduce the difference between the current operating condition and the design operating condition for the element of the fired heater unit.
Other technical features may be readily apparent to one skilled in the art from the following figures, descriptions, and claims.
The present disclosure is illustrated by way of example and not limited in the accompanying figures in which like reference numerals indicate similar elements and in which:
In the following description of various illustrative embodiments, reference is made to the accompanying drawings, which form a part hereof, and in which is shown, by way of illustration, various embodiments in which aspects of the disclosure may be practiced. It is to be understood that other embodiments may be utilized, and structural and functional modifications may be made, without departing from the scope of the present disclosure.
It is noted that various connections between elements are discussed in the following description. It is noted that these connections are general and, unless specified otherwise, may be direct or indirect, wired or wireless, and that the specification is not intended to be limiting in this respect.
Chemical processes frequently need heating of process streams. Fired heaters (furnaces or process heaters) are common process units in chemical plants for such heating. A fired heater is a direct-fired heat exchanger that uses the hot gases of combustion to raise the temperature of a process fluid feed flowing through tubes (coils) positioned within the heater. Fired heaters may deliver feed at a predetermined temperature to the next stage of the reaction process or perform reactions such as thermal cracking.
Fired heaters are designed to heat feed streams or intermediate process streams to temperatures necessary for the chemical reactions in the processes to occur at a reasonable rate. Fired heaters used in the petrochemical industry generally utilize both radiant and convective heat transfer and comprise an insulated enclosure containing tubes (coils). As seen in
A non-limiting example fired heater process 100 is shown in
The fired heater 100 comprises a firebox 108 having a plurality of walls 118 and a floor 120 which define a radiation section 122, a convection section 124, and a stack 130. Walls 118 may adjoin roof sections 126 which define a transition section 128 (crossover) between the radiation section 122 and the convection section 124. The radiation section 122 contains radiation section tubes 132 and is a portion of the heater in which heat is transferred to the tubes primarily by radiation. The convection section 124 contains the convection section tubes 134 is a portion of the heater in which heat is transferred to the tubes primarily by convection.
Stack 130 is a vertical conduit used to discharge flue gas to the atmosphere. The stack may have a damper (not shown) to introduce variable resistance in order to regulate the flow of flue gas or air. The fired heater may utilize a natural draft—wherein a stack effect induces the combustion air and removal of the flue gases; a forced draft—wherein combustion air is supplied by a fan or mechanical means into the heater; an induced-draft—wherein a fan removes flue gases and maintains negative pressure in the heater to induce combustion air without a forced-draft fan; or a balanced draft—wherein forced-draft fans supply combustion air and induced draft fans remove the flue gases.
In the fired heater 100, product or natural gas may be used as fuel to enter the fired heater 100 through a header (not shown), which distributes the gas into the burners to be combusted. Refractory is used throughout the inside of the heater to shield the heater casing from excess temperatures and is typically castable and ceramic fiber and may be two or more layers.
Heating tubes in the fired heater 100 carry fluid material such as crude oil through the fired heater 100 to be heated. Radiation section tubes 132 are disposed along the walls 118 of the radiation section 122. Banks or rows of convection section tubes 134 are disposed along the walls 118 and through the open space between the walls 118 in the convection section 124. The convection section tubes 134 may have a smooth outside surface or the convection section tubes 134 may have studs or fins welded to the outside surface.
The lowest rows, for example, the lowest three rows, of convection section tubes 134 may be shock tubes 134a. These shock tubes 134a absorb both radiation heat from the radiation section 122 and convection heat from the flue gas flowing through convection section 124. The shock tubes 134a in the lowest banks 136 can be designed thicker than standard furnace shock tubes to accommodate higher temperatures.
The shock tubes 134 a may be specified as 9-Chrome, 1-Molybdenum Schedule 80 AW or 347H austenitic stainless steel tubes Schedule 80 AW, which may be more resistant to corrosion-based fouling due to high-temperature surface oxidation. The other convection section 134 and radiant section tubes 132 may be specified to be 9-Chrome, 1-Molybdenum Schedule 40 AW. Other tube metallurgies may be suitable.
The convection section tubes 134 may be disposed, for example, in a triangular pitch or a square pitch. Multiple banks of convection tubes 134 may be suitable. In an embodiment, 10 to 20 rows of convection tubes 134 may be used, but more or fewer rows of convection tubes may be suitable. Multiple flue gas ducts (not shown) at the top of the convection section 124 may route to one stack 130. In some embodiments, there may be two to four flue gas ducts at the top of the convection section 124 routing flue gas to the stack 130.
Surface burners 104 are provided in the floor 120 of the fired heater 100. Surface burners may be free convection burners which provide oxygen-containing gas such as air through a passageway that directs air in proximity to injected fuel gas to generate a flame. The surface burners 104 can be configured to burn fuel gas or liquid fuel.
Fuel gas is provided to surface burners 104. The surface burners may be continuously fired at a fuel gas flow rate substantially less than maximum capacity and preferably at maximum turndown or minimal capacity, so as to remain lit. In some embodiments, the surface burners 104 may be located in the floor as shown, or the surface burners may be located along the walls.
The surface burners 104 may be arrayed in one or multiple rows on the floor 112 of the radiant section 122 although other arrays may be suitable. Depending on the size and operating parameters, at least one or more burners (e.g., 40 to 200 surface burners) 104 may be provided on the floor 112.
A floor type of surface burner 104 is shown in
In addition to surface burners, duct burners may be present. Duct burners operate differently than the surface burners 104 by injecting fuel into an oxygen-containing stream that is passing the duct burner, whereas the surface burners 104 provide and direct into close proximity the oxygen-containing stream and the fuel gas necessary for combustion.
Premix burners may also be used as surface burners 104. In a premix burner, an intake that admits air into the pipe (not shown) directs air into proximity with the fuel in the pipe and the orifices inject fuel as well as air. Orifices in fluid communication with said air intake receive air and fuel from the passageway.
Suitable burners may include, for example, Callidus burners by UOP, which may be designed to meet NOx reduction requirements in refinery or petrochemical fired heater applications.
References herein to a “plant” are to be understood to refer to any of various types of chemical and petrochemical manufacturing or refining facilities. References herein to a plant “operators” are to be understood to refer to and/or include, without limitation, plant planners, managers, engineers, technicians, technical advisors, specialists (e.g., in instrumentation, pipe fitting, and welding), shift personnel, and others interested in, starting up, overseeing, monitoring operations of, and shutting down, the plant.
Monitoring Fired Heaters
One of the biggest operating costs in chemical process industries (CPI) is energy. Fired heaters are the major consumers of energy, especially in petroleum refineries and petrochemical plants. Fired heaters can account for as much as 70% of total energy consumption in a plant. One way to attempt to lower this recurring expense is to improve the performance of the fired heaters. Obtaining valuable and/or timely feedback may assist in improving the performance of such fired heaters.
Process equipment used in the fired heater process may deteriorate over time, affecting the performance and integrity of the process. Deteriorating equipment may ultimately fail, but before failing, may decrease efficiency, yield, and/or product properties. Thus, a contributor to poor performance in fired heaters may be a state of disrepair of burners. Such disrepair may be addressed with timely maintenance. In some systems, burners in disrepair may go unnoticed until a near catastrophic event occurs. Therefore, by monitoring equipment performance, fired heaters or fired-heater components (e.g., burners) in need of repair may be identified.
Fired heater equipment may be monitored using one or more sensors to monitor certain conditions or parameters in a fired heater. For example, sensors may be used to monitor data, and a system may be configured to take one or more actions, such as sending one or more alerts or sounding one or more alarms if certain conditions are met.
Examples of measurements that may be taken regarding fired heater equipment may include:
Bridgewall temperature—temperature of flue gas leaving the radiant section.
Radiation loss/setting loss—heat lost to the surroundings from the casing of the heater and ducts and auxiliary equipment.
Volumetric heat release—heat released divided by the net volume of the radiant section, excluding the tubes and refractory dividing walls.
Heat absorption—total heat absorbed by the tubes, excluding any combustion-air preheat.
Fouling resistance—factor used to calculate the overall heat transfer coefficient.
Total heat release—heat liberated from the specified fuel, using the lower heating value of the fuel.
Excess air—amount of air above the stoichiometric requirement for complete combustion (expressed as a %).
Flue gas—gaseous product of combustion including excess air.
Pressure drop—difference between the inlet and the outlet static pressures between termination points, excluding the static differential head.
Fuel efficiency—total heat absorbed divided by the total input of heat derived from the combustion of fuel only (lower heating value basis).
Thermal efficiency—total heat absorbed divided by the total input of heat derived from the combustion of fuel plus sensible heats from air, fuel and any atomizing medium.
Average heat flux density—heat absorbed divided by the exposed surface of the tube section.
Aspects of the system described herein are directed to monitoring and analysis of utility process conditions and interrelationships (e.g., fuel, air, emissions). The system may further provide data, alerts, or automated or manual responses to data, which may allow for corrective actions to avoid unscheduled shutdowns associated with poor performance, e.g., poor burner performance, and/or provide data to help to optimize the performance of fired heaters and/or reduce energy consumption.
For example, monitoring fired heaters may be performed to determine if burner issues or other problems are occurring, or if equipment failures are imminent. Monitoring also helps to collect data that can be correlated and used to predict behavior or problems in different fired heaters used in the same plant or in other plants and/or processes.
Key performance indicators that may be indicative of burner wear or heater imbalance may include, but are not limited to, O2 levels, CO emissions, NOx emissions, fuel gas pressure, TMT variation, and energy savings. Sensors used to gather information used to determine such indicators may include, for example, temperature sensors, pressure sensors, flow sensors, moisture sensors/analyzers, infrared cameras, tunable laser diodes, optical pyrometry, chemical sensors/analyzers, and gas valve position sensors.
Aspects of the disclosure may be used to identify deteriorating equipment. There may or may not be anything that can be done to correct issues or problems associated with the issues in existing equipment, depending on the cause of the issues. In some aspects, process changes or operating conditions may be altered to preserve the equipment until the next scheduled maintenance period.
Furthermore, elements of plants may be exposed to the outside and thus can be exposed to various environmental stresses. Such stresses may be weather related, such as temperature extremes (hot and cold), high-wind conditions, and precipitation conditions such as snow, ice, and rain. Other environmental conditions may be pollution particulates, such as dust and pollen, or salt if located near an ocean, for example. Such stresses can affect the performance and lifetime of equipment in the plants. Different locations may have different environmental stresses. For example, a refinery in Texas may have different stresses than a chemical plant in Montana. Aspects of the disclosure can be used to identify if such stresses are occurring and suggest corrective action.
Sensor Data Collection and Processing
In some plants, an operational objective may be to improve fired heaters efficiencies on an ongoing and consistent basis. Therefore, a system may deliver timely and/or regular reports indicating current performance, along with interpretation and consulting on what actions may be performed to improve fired heater performance. These actions can include modifications to furnace operating conditions and/or burner maintenance to address fundamental burner performance issues. This system may provide an alternative to a very rudimentary data collection and analysis process, which may yield poor recommendations that are not generated with the required expertise and/or are not provided in a timely manner. The system may provide improved reporting and recommendations via a software monitoring system that delivers a timely report (e.g., web based), and/or additional recommendations, alerts, or triggers of remedial or corrective actions.
The system may include one or more computing devices or platforms for collecting, storing, processing, and analyzing data from one or more sensors.
Although the computing system environment 500 of
In yet another example, the data collection platform 502 and data analysis platform 504 may reside on a single server computer or virtual machine and be depicted as a single, combined logical box on a system diagram. Moreover, a data store may be separate and apart from the data collection platform 502 and data analysis platform 504 to store a large amount of values collected from sensors and other components. The data store may be embodied in a database format and may be made accessible to the public network 516; meanwhile, the control platform 506, data collection platform 502, and data analysis platform 504 may be restricted to the private network 514 and left inaccessible to the public network 516. As such, the data collected from a plant may be shared with users (e.g., engineers, data scientists, others), a company's employees, and even third parties (e.g., subscribers to the company's data feed) without compromising potential security requirements related to operation of a plant. The data store may be accessible to one or more users and/or remote devices over the public network 516.
Referring to
In addition, sensors may include transmitters and deviation alarms. These sensors may be programmed to set off an alarm, which may be audible and/or visual.
Other sensors may transmit signals to a processor or a hub that collects the data and sends to a processor. For example, temperature and pressure measurements may be sent to a hub (e.g., data collection platform 502). In one example, temperature sensors 526 may include thermocouples, fiber optic temperature measurement, thermal cameras, and/or infrared cameras. Skin thermocouples may be applied to tubes or placed directly on a wall of a fired heater unit. Alternatively, thermal (infrared) cameras may be used to detect temperature (e.g., hot spots) in one or more aspects of the equipment, including tubes. A shielded (insulated) tube skin thermocouple assembly may be used to obtain accurate measurements. One example of a thermocouple may be a removable XTRACTO Pad. A thermocouple can be replaced without any additional welding. Clips and/or pads may be utilized for ease of replacement. Fiber Optic cable can be attached to a unit, line, or vessel to provide a complete profile of temperatures.
Furthermore, flow sensors 531 may be used in flow paths such as the inlet to the path, outlet from the path, or within the path. If multiple tubes are utilized, the flow sensors 531 may be placed in corresponding positions in each of the tubes. In this manner, one can determine if one of the tubes is behaving abnormally compared to other tubes. Flow may be determined by pressure-drop across a known resistance, such as by using pressure taps. Other types of flow sensors 531 include, but are not limited to, ultrasonic, turban meter, hot wire anemometer, vane meter, Kármán™, vortex sensor, membrane sensor (membrane has a thin film temperature sensor printed on the upstream side, and one on the downstream side), tracer, radiographic imaging (e.g., identify two-phase vs. single-phase region of channels), an orifice plate in front of or integral to each tube or channel, pitot tube, thermal conductivity flow meter, anemometer, internal pressure flow profile, and/or measure cross tracer (measuring when the flow crosses one plate and when the flow crosses another plate).
Moisture level sensors 524 may be used to monitor moisture levels at one or more locations. For example, moisture levels at an outlet may be measured. Additionally, moisture levels at an inlet or at a predetermined depth within the fired heater unit may be measured. In some embodiments, a moisture level at an inlet may be known (e.g., a feed is used that has a known moisture level or moisture content).
A gas chromatograph 523 on the feed or fuel gas to the fired heater can be used to speciate the various components to provide empirical data to be used in calculations.
Sensor data, process measurements, and/or calculations made using the sensor data or process measurements may be used to monitor and/or improve the performance of the equipment and parts making up the equipment, as discussed in further detail below. For example, sensor data may be used to detect that a desirable or an undesirable chemical reaction is taking place within a particular piece of equipment, and one or more actions may be taken to encourage or inhibit the chemical reaction. Chemical sensors may be used to detect the presence of one or more chemicals or components in the streams, such as corrosive species, oxygen, hydrogen, and/or water (moisture). Chemical sensors may utilize gas chromatographs 523, liquid chromatographs, distillation measurements, and/or octane measurements. In another example, equipment information, such as wear, efficiency, production, state, or other condition information, may be gathered and determined based on sensor data.
Corrective action may be taken based on determining this equipment information. For example, if the equipment is showing signs of wear or failure, corrective actions may be taken, such as taking an inventory of parts to ensure replacement parts are available, ordering replacement parts, and/or calling in repair personnel to the site. Certain parts of equipment may be replaced immediately. Other parts may be safe to continue to use, but a monitoring schedule may be adjusted. A control platform (e.g., control platform 506) may send one or more signals to automatically adjust one or more valves 542, pipes, gates 543, sprayers 545, pumps 540, feeds (e.g., using feed switcher 541), inputs or settings of a fired heater (e.g., fired heater 544) or the like. Alternatively or additionally, one or more inputs or controls relating to a process may be adjusted as part of the corrective action. These and other details about the equipment, sensors, processing of sensor data, and actions taken based on sensor data are described in further detail below.
Monitoring the fired heaters and the processes using fired heaters includes collecting data that can be correlated and used to predict behavior or problems in different the fired heater used in the same plant or in other plants and/or processes. Data collected from the various sensors (e.g., measurements such as flow, pressure drop, thermal performance, vessel skin temperature at the top, vibration) may be correlated with external data, such as environmental or weather data. Process changes or operating conditions may be able to be altered to preserve the equipment until the next scheduled maintenance period. Fluids may be monitored for corrosive contaminants and pH may be monitored in order to predict higher than normal corrosion rates within the fired heater equipment. At a high level, sensor data collected (e.g., by the data collection platform 502) and data analysis (e.g., by the data analysis platform 504) may be used together, for example, for process simulation, equipment simulation, and/or other tasks. For example, sensor data may be used for process simulation and reconciliation of sensor data. The resulting, improved process simulation may provide a stream of physical properties that are used to calculate heat flow, etc. These calculations may lead to thermal and pressure drop performance prediction calculations for specific equipment, and comparisons of equipment predictions to observations from the operating data (e.g., predicted/expected outlet temperature and pressure vs. measured outlet temperature and pressure). This causes identification of one or issues that may eventually lead to a potential control changes and/or recommendations, etc.
Systems Facilitating Sensor Data Collection
Sensor data may be collected by a data collection platform 502. The sensors may interface with the data collection platform 502 via wired or wireless transmissions. Sensor data (e.g., temperature data) may be collected continuously or at periodic intervals (e.g., every second, every five seconds, every ten seconds, every minute, every five minutes, every ten minutes, every hour, every two hours, every five hours, every twelve hours, every day, every other day, every week, every other week, every month, every other month, every six months, every year, or another interval). Data may be collected at different locations at different intervals. For example, data at a known hot spot may be collected at a first interval, and data at a spot that is not a known hot spot may be collected at a second interval. The data collection platform 502 may continuously or periodically (e.g., every second, every minute, every hour, every day, once a week, once a month) transmit collected sensor data to a data analysis platform, which may be nearby or remote from the data collection platform.
The computing system environment 500 of
In addition, the platform and/or devices in
Furthermore, the platform and/or devices in
In some examples, one or more sensor devices in
Referring to
Data collection platform 502 may include or be in communication with one or more data historians 566. The data historian 566 may be implemented as one or more software modules, one or more virtual machines, or one or more hardware elements (e.g., servers). The data historian may collect data at regular intervals (e.g., every minute, every two minutes, every ten minutes, every thirty minutes).
The data historian 566 may include or be in communication with a process scout 567. The process scout 567 may be implemented as one or more software modules, one or more virtual machines, or one or more hardware elements (e.g., servers). The process scout 567 may work with or in place of the data collection module 565 and/or the data historian 566 to handle one or more aspects of data replication.
Although the elements of
In addition, the data collection module 565 may assist the processor 560 in the data collection platform 502 in communicating with, via the communications interface 568, and processing data received from other sources, such as data feeds from third-party servers and manual entry at the field site from a dashboard graphical user interface. For example, a third-party server may provide contemporaneous weather data to the data collection module. Some elements of chemical and petrochemical/refinery plants may be exposed to the outside and thus may be exposed to various environmental stresses. Such stresses may be weather related such as temperature extremes (hot and cold), high wind conditions, and precipitation conditions such as snow, ice, and rain. Other environmental conditions may be pollution particulates such as dust and pollen, or salt if located near an ocean, for example. Such stresses can affect the performance and lifetime of equipment in the plants. Different locations may have different environmental stresses. For example, a refinery in Texas will have different stresses than a chemical plant in Montana. In another example, data manually entered from a dashboard graphical user interface (or other means) may be collected and saved into memory by the data collection module. Production rates may be entered and saved in memory. Tracking production rates may indicate issues with flows. For example, as fouling occurs, the production rate may fall if a specific outlet temperature can no longer be achieved at the targeted capacity and capacity has to be reduced to maintain the targeted outlet temperature.
Referring to
In addition, the data analysis platform 504 may include a loop scout 574. In some embodiments, the loop scout 574 may comprise computer-executable instructions that, when executed by the processor, cause the data analysis platform to perform one or more of the steps disclosed herein. In other embodiments, the loop scout 574 may be a virtual machine. In some embodiments, the loop scout 574 may be a hybrid of software-based and/or hardware-based instructions to perform one or more of the steps disclosed herein.
Further, the data analysis platform 504 may include a data service 576. In some embodiments, the data service 576 may comprise computer-executable instructions that, when executed by the processor, cause the data analysis platform 504 to perform one or more of the steps disclosed herein. In other embodiments, the data service 576 may be a virtual machine. In some embodiments, the data service 576 may be a hybrid of software-based and/or hardware-based instructions to perform one or more of the steps disclosed herein.
Also, the data analysis platform 504 may include a data historian 577. In some embodiments, the data historian 577 may comprise computer-executable instructions that, when executed by the processor, cause the data analysis platform 504 to perform one or more of the steps disclosed herein. In other embodiments, the data historian 577 may be a virtual machine. In some embodiments, the data historian 577 may be a hybrid of software-based and/or hardware-based instructions to perform one or more of the steps disclosed herein. The data historian 577 may collect data at regular intervals (e.g., every minute, every two minutes, every ten minutes, every thirty minutes).
Additionally, the data analysis platform 504 may include a data lake 578. In some embodiments, the data lake 578 may comprise computer-executable instructions that, when executed by the processor, cause the data analysis platform 504 to perform one or more of the steps disclosed herein. In other embodiments, the data lake 578 may be a virtual machine. In some embodiments, the data lake 578 may be a hybrid of software-based and/or hardware-based instructions to perform one or more of the steps disclosed herein. The data lake 578 may perform relational data storage. The data lake 578 may provide data in a format that may be useful for processing data and/or performing data analytics.
Moreover, the data analysis platform 504 may include a calculations service 579. In some embodiments, the calculations service 579 may comprise computer-executable instructions that, when executed by the processor, cause the data analysis platform 504 to perform one or more of the steps disclosed herein. In other embodiments, the calculations service 579 may be a virtual machine. In some embodiments, the calculations service 579 may be a hybrid of software-based and/or hardware-based instructions to perform one or more of the steps disclosed herein. The calculations service 579 may collect data, perform calculations, and/or provide key performance indicators. The calculations service may implement, for example, process dynamic modeling software or tools (e.g., UniSim).
Furthermore, the data analysis platform 504 may include a utility service 580. In some embodiments, the utility service 580 may comprise computer-executable instructions that, when executed by the processor, cause the data analysis platform 504 to perform one or more of the steps disclosed herein. In other embodiments, the utility service 580 may be a virtual machine. In some embodiments, the utility service 580 may be a hybrid of software-based and/or hardware-based instructions to perform one or more of the steps disclosed herein. The utility service 580 may take information from the calculations service and put the information into the data lake. The utility service 580 may provide data aggregation service, such as taking all data for a particular range, normalizing the data (e.g., determining an average), and combining the normalized data into a file to send to another system or module.
One or more components of the data analysis platform 504 may assist the processor 570 in the data analysis platform 504 in processing and analyzing the data values stored in the database. In some embodiments, the data analysis platform 504 may perform statistical analysis, predictive analytics, and/or machine learning on the data values in the database to generate predictions and models. For example, the data analysis platform 504 may analyze sensor data to detect new hot spots and/or to monitor existing hot spots (e.g., to determine if an existing hot spot is growing, maintaining the same size, or shrinking) in the equipment of a plant. The data analysis platform 504 may compare temperature data from different dates to determine if changes are occurring. Such comparisons may be made on a monthly, weekly, daily, hourly, real-time, or some other basis.
Referring to
Although the elements of
Referring to
In a plant environment such as illustrated in
Referring to
Although
Although the elements of
Referring to
The aforementioned cloud computing infrastructure may use a data collection platform 502 (such as process scout) associated with a plant to capture data, e.g., sensor measurements, which are automatically sent to the cloud infrastructure, which may be remotely located, where it is reviewed to, for example, eliminate errors and biases, and used to calculate and report performance results. The data collection platform 502 may include an optimization unit that acquires data from a customer site, other site, and/or plant (e.g., sensors and other data collectors at a plant) on a recurring basis. For cleansing, the data may be analyzed for completeness and corrected for gross errors by the optimization unit. The data may also be corrected for measurement issues (e.g., an accuracy problem for establishing a simulation steady state) and overall mass balance closure to generate a duplicate set of reconciled plant data. The corrected data may be used as an input to a simulation process, in which the process model is tuned to ensure that the simulation process matches the reconciled plant data. An output of the reconciled plant data may be used to generate predicted data using a collection of virtual process model objects as a unit of process design.
The performance of the plant and/or individual process units of the plant may be compared to the performance predicted by one or more process models to identify any operating differences or gaps. Furthermore, the process models and collected data (e.g., plant operation information) may be used to run optimization routines that converge on an optimal plant operation for a given values of, e.g., feed, products, and/or prices. A routine may be understood to refer to a sequence of computer programs or instructions for performing a particular task.
The data analysis platform 504 may comprise an analysis unit that determines operating status, based on at least one of a kinetic model, a parametric model, an analytical tool, and a related knowledge and best practice standard. The analysis unit may receive historical and/or current performance data from one or a plurality of plants to proactively predict future actions to be performed. To predict various limits of a particular process and stay within the acceptable range of limits, the analysis unit may determine target operational parameters of a final product based on actual current and/or historical operational parameters. This evaluation by the analysis unit may be used to proactively predict future actions to be performed. In another example, the analysis unit may establish a boundary or threshold of an operating parameter of the plant based on at least one of an existing limit and an operation condition. In yet another example, the analysis unit may establish a relationship between at least two operational parameters related to a specific process for the operation of the plant. Finally in yet another example, one or more of the aforementioned examples may be performed with or without a combination of the other examples.
The plant process model may predict plant performance that is expected based upon plant operation information. The plant process model results can be used to monitor the health of the plant and to determine whether any upset or poor measurement occurred. The plant process model may be generated by an iterative process that models at various plant constraints to determine the desired plant process model.
Using a web-based system for implementing the method of this disclosure provides many benefits, such as improved plant economic performance due to an increased ability by plant operators to identify and capture economic opportunities, a sustained ability to bridge plant performance gaps, and an increased ability to leverage personnel expertise and improve training and development. Some of the methods disclosed herein allow for automated daily evaluation of process performance, thereby increasing the frequency of performance review with less time and effort required from plant operations staff.
Further, the analytics unit may be partially or fully automated. In one embodiment, the system is performed by a computer system, such as a third-party computer system, remote from the plant and/or the plant planning center. The system may receive signals and parameters via the communication network, and displays in real time related performance information on an interactive display device accessible to an operator or user. The web-based platform allows all users to work with the same information, thereby creating a collaborative environment for sharing best practices or for troubleshooting. The method further provides more accurate prediction and optimization results due to fully configured models. Routine automated evaluation of plant planning and operation models allows timely plant model tuning to reduce or eliminate gaps between plant models and the actual plant performance. Implementing the aforementioned methods using the web-based platform also allows for monitoring and updating multiple sites, thereby better enabling facility planners to propose realistic optimal targets.
As shown in
Detecting and Addressing Problems with Fired Heaters
Aspects of the present disclosure are directed to monitoring fired heater processes for potential and existing issues, providing alerts, and/or adjusting operating conditions to optimize burner life. There are many process performance indicators that may be monitored including, but not limited to, fuel, air (oxygen), emissions (e.g., CO, NOx), temperature, and/or pressure.
In some embodiments, a system may determine operating characteristics. The system may determine system performance characteristics. The system may determine optimal operating characteristics. In some embodiments, the optimal operating characteristics may be based on a designed-for operating level, a regulation (e.g., a maximum allowable emission level), or one or more other criteria. The system may determine whether there is a difference between recent operating performance and the optimal operating performance. If there is a difference (e.g., if the difference is above a threshold), the system may suggest adjusting one or more operating characteristics to decrease the difference between the actual operating performance in the recent and the optimal operating performance.
In some embodiments, the system may automatically adjust the one or more operating characteristics. Alternatively or additionally, the system may provide an alert or other information to an operator, with a request to adjust the one or more operating characteristics. In one example the system may adjust the flow of fuel gas, excess air to the heater, process flow, stack pressure, or the like. Adjusting the operating characteristics may be performed in an iterative fashion.
Periodically, the system may determine whether there is a difference between the actual operating performance and the optimal performance, and if so, again adjust operating characteristics to decrease the difference. By iteratively reviewing recent performance and adjusting characteristics, the system may thereby optimize the operating performance for a fired heater unit. This may result in improved performance, e.g., extend burner life, reduce energy use, reduce emissions.
Processing Sensor Data
One or more calculations may be performed for fired heater remote monitoring service. These calculations may assist in alerting and helping diagnose the status of burners and other components used in fired heaters.
The data processing platform may receive (e.g., from one or more sensors) one or more operational parameters, which may be used alone or in combination for determining the efficiency of the fired heater.
The data processing platform may use one or more design parameters, alone or in combination, for determining the status of the fired heater. A design parameter may be a level at which the fired heater was designed to operate at, below, or above. For example, a fired heater may be designed to emit less than a threshold level of a particular matter (e.g., based on a regulation controlling emissions of that matter).
In some instances, the timestamp of a calculated attribute may match the timestamp of the raw data used for the calculation. In some instances, a calculated attribute may use one or more results of one or more other calculated attributes; therefore, the order in which the attributes are calculated may be relevant.
In some embodiments, raw values may be checked for bad values. If bad values are detected, the data processing platform may either skip calculation or replace the bad value with NULL, as appropriate for subsequent calculations. For averages, a provision may be made to skip bad/null values and/or timestamps.
Some units of measurement for variables may be specified. Some variables may be dimensionless, and therefore might not have a defined unit of measurement.
Dashboard
The dashboard 700 may be different based on an intended user of the dashboard 700. For example, as depicted in
Returning to
The dashboard 700 may display the information for a particular time or period of time (e.g., the last five minutes, the last ten minutes, the last hour, the last two hours, the last 12 hours, the last 24 hours, multiple days, multiple months). The dashboard 700 may be adjustable to show different ranges of time, automatically or based on user input.
The dashboard 700 may include a contact name and/or contact information (e.g., telephone number, pager number, email address, text message number, social media account name) for a sales representative. Then, for example, if a dashboard user needs assistance (e.g., purchasing more burners, seeking assistance for repairs, finding out more information about purchased products), the dashboard user may easily contact the sales representative.
The dashboard 700 may include a contact name and/or contact information for technical support. Then, for example, if the dashboard user using the dashboard needs assistance (e.g., interpreting dashboard data, adjusting a product level, adjusting an equipment setting, adjusting an operating characteristic), the dashboard user may easily contact technical support.
The dashboard 700 may display a time and/or date range of the time and/or date range for which data is being displayed. For example,
Returning to
The dashboard 700 may include, on one or more graphs, a line indicating a design level. Specifically, the line may indicate the level at which the equipment was designed to operate. The design line may be static. The design line may be based on an actual operating condition of another factor. For example, the design line for emission levels of a first matter may be based on the actual operating level of a second matter. Thus, for example, if the O2 concentration is at a first level, the design line for CO emissions may be at a first level, and if the O2 concentration is at a second level, the design line for CO emissions may be at a second level. The design line may be provided by, e.g., an entity associated with a design of the equipment, the plant, or the like.
The dashboard 700 may include, on one or more graphs, a line, bar, or other indicator of an actual operating result. The actual operating result may be related to a time and/or date range (e.g., the displayed time and/or date range). The actual operating result may be related to a particular fired heater unit (e.g., dark blue for a first fired heater unit, medium blue for a second fired heater unit, light blue for a third fired heater unit). The actual operating result may be dynamic.
The dashboard 700 may include one or more colored banners (e.g., at the bottom of the dashboard) that may correspond to one or more current operating conditions corresponding to one or more graphs of the dashboard. The colored banners may include one or more colors (e.g., green, yellow, red), which may correspond to one or more operating conditions of fired heater equipment. For example, if a gas concentration level of equipment is at an acceptable level, the colored banner may be green. If the gas concentration level of the equipment is at a level that necessitates increased monitoring or that may indicate an impending need (e.g., maintenance), the colored banner may be yellow. If the gas concentration level of the equipment is at a problematic level, the colored banner may be red.
The dashboard 700 may include a graph 704 that shows O2 concentration in the stack over a time period (e.g., six weeks). The graph may include a first line that indicates an ideal or desired level, and a second line that indicates an actual operating level. The graph may correspond with a colored banner at the bottom of the screen. The banner may indicate if the O2 level is within in a suitable range (e.g., green), an elevated but acceptable range (e.g., yellow), or is out of range (e.g., red).
The dashboard 700 may include a graph 706 that shows CO emissions in the stack over a time period (e.g., eight weeks). The graph may include a first line that indicates a maximum emission level (e.g., based on a regulation), and a second line that indicates an actual emission level. The graph may correspond with a colored banner at the bottom of the screen. The banner may indicate if the CO level is in a suitable range (e.g., green), an elevated but acceptable range (e.g., yellow), or is out of range (e.g., red).
The dashboard 700 may include a graph 708 that shows NOx concentration in the stack over a time period. The graph may include a first line that indicates a maximum emission level (e.g., based on a regulation), a second line that indicates an actual operating level, and a third line that indicates an emission level based on another factor (e.g., what the NOx emissions would be if the O2 concentration was at the designed-for level (e.g., 3%)). The graph may correspond with a colored banner at the bottom of the dashboard. The banner may indicate if the NOx level is in a suitable range (e.g., green), an elevated but acceptable range (e.g., yellow), or is out of range (e.g., red).
The dashboard 700 may include a graph 710 that shows fuel gas pressure at the burner inlets over a time period. The graph may include a first line that indicates fuel gas pressure at an ideal condition (based on a number of different conditions, e.g., weather, feed composition), and a second line that indicates fuel gas pressure at current operating conditions. By seeing the two different lines on the same graph, a user may determine a deviation between the two lines. If the deviation changes, the user may determine that something has changed in the system, and may further determine that additional inspections and/or repairs need to be made. In some embodiments, the system may generate and/or send an alert to a local or remote device based on the deviation changing more than a threshold amount or passing above or below a particular threshold amount. The graph may correspond with a colored banner at the bottom of the dashboard. The banner may indicate if the fuel gas concentration is in a suitable range (e.g., green), an elevated but acceptable range (e.g., yellow), or is out of range (e.g., red).
The dashboard 700 may include a graph 712 that shows flue gas temperatures in the stack over a time period. The graph may include a first line that indicates a temperature at a first section (e.g., radiation section) of the fired heater, and a second line that indicates a temperature at a second section (e.g., convection section) of the fired heater. The graph may correspond with a colored banner at the bottom of the dashboard. The banner may indicate if the FuelGas temperature is in a suitable range (e.g., green), an elevated but acceptable range (e.g., yellow), or is out of range (e.g., red).
The dashboard 700 may include a display 714 of tube metal temperature (TMT) variation in the convection and radiation sections. The graph may include multiple charts; for example, a first chart 718 that shows TMT in a first section (e.g., radiation section) of the fired heater, and a second chart 716 that shows TMT in a second section (e.g., convection section) of the fired heater. Each chart may depict a daily average of a number of different temperature readings from within the corresponding section of the fired heater. For example, the temperature of the convection section of the fired heater may be measured hourly, and the 24 different temperature readings from the course of the day may be averaged to determine the average temperature for that day of the convection section of the fired heater. The graph may include a line that shows the designed-for average temperature for each section (e.g., convection, radiation) of the heater. The graph may also represent each tube metal temperature indication separately, allowing the user to look for hot spots within the heater box. Hot spots could be an indication of equipment degradation and future maintenance requirements. The graph may correspond with a colored banner at the bottom of the dashboard. The banner may indicate if the TMT radiation, TMT convection, and transition temperature are within suitable ranges (e.g., green), elevated but acceptable ranges (e.g., yellow), or are out of range (e.g., red).
In another example, a savings chart (e.g., accumulated energy savings chart) 720 may show an accumulated amount of energy savings, which may be a dynamically increasing total number of dollars that the operator saved by optimizing fired heater operating characteristics. For example, energy losses may be suffered by using more fuel than is necessary. Because the system makes more close monitoring possible, as well as corresponding repairs and adjustments to operating conditions, a fuel heater may be operated more efficiently, thereby producing energy savings.
In another example, a losses chart (e.g., accumulated energy losses chart) 722 may show current levels of energy losses (e.g., energy expended unnecessarily) over time. As energy losses are decreased (e.g., by operating the fired heater more efficiently), the energy savings (e.g., as depicted on the energy savings chart) may increase. The losses chart may include a line that shows a baseline amount of energy losses, which may correspond to a design level of energy usage, a historical average level of energy usage, or some other baseline against which to compare current energy losses.
In some embodiments, the dashboard 700 may include a summary 724 of current stack energy losses, historic stack energy losses, and current stack energy savings over a time period, e.g., yearly.
In some embodiments, the dashboard 700 may include heater information 726, such as the type of configuration, service, fuel type, and/or number of burners of a heater.
The dashboard 700 may be configured to receive a confirmation of whether one or more fired heater units are operating within healthy operating times. This may give the operator additional confidence and/or information about how to adjust one or more operating characteristics for the fired heater unit to optimize burner life while minimizing risk to the process outcomes. Alternatively or additionally, a control system may automatically adjust the one or more operating characteristics for the fired heater unit to optimize burner life while minimizing risk to the process outcomes.
In some aspects, data displayed by the dashboard 700 may be refreshed in real time, according to a preset schedule (e.g., every five seconds, every ten seconds, every minute), and/or in response to a refresh request received from a user.
The dashboard 700 may include a button or option that allows a user to send data to one or more other devices. For example, the user may be able to send data via email, SMS, text message, IMESSAGE, FTP, cloud sharing, AIRDROP, or some other method. The user may be able to select one or more pieces of data, graphics, charts, graphs, elements of the display, or the like to share or send.
The data collected by this system may provide a historical information of events, operations, and/or data. This information can be modelled to predict and/or anticipate future issues. This can be used to call for proactive maintenance actions and/or make corrective actions to the operation of the process unit to have an uninterrupted service.
Alerts
In some embodiments, a graphical user interface of an application may be used for providing alerts and/or receiving or generating commands for taking corrective action related to fired heater units, in accordance with one or more embodiments described herein. The graphical user interface may include an alert with information about a current state of a piece of equipment (e.g., a fired heater), a problem being experienced by a piece of equipment (e.g., a fired heater or burner), a problem with a plant, or the like. For example, the graphical user interface may include an alert that a fired heater is experiencing a particular issue, a fired heater is operating at a particular level, a particular problem has been detected, or another alert.
The graphical user interface may include one or more buttons that, when pressed, cause one or more actions to be taken. For example, the graphical user interface may include a button that, when pressed, causes an operating characteristic (e.g., of a fired heater unit, of a valve, of a plant, or the like) to change. For example, an amount of fuel being used may be increased or decreased (e.g., the computer may send a signal that opens or closes one or more valves or adjusts one or more flow controllers that control an amount of fuel provided to a fired heater) in response to a particular condition being detected. In another example, the graphical user interface may include a button that, when pressed, sends an alert to a contact, the alert including information similar to the information included in the alert provided via the graphical user interface. For example, an alert may be sent to one or more devices, and one or more users of those devices may cause those devices to send alerts, further information, and/or instructions to one or more other devices. In a further example, the graphical user interface may include a button that, when pressed, shows one or more other actions that may be taken (e.g., additional corrective actions, adjustments to operating conditions).
Several levels of alerts may be utilized. One level of alerts may be for alerts that require emergency action (e.g., Level 1). Another level of alerts may be for alerts that require action, but not immediate action (e.g., Level 2). Another level of alerts may be for alerts that are not related to the fired heater unit (e.g., Level 3). A number of illustrative alerts are described below. These alerts are merely illustrative, and the disclosure is not limited to these alerts. Instead, these are merely examples of some of the types of alerts that may be related to, e.g., a fired heater unit. As exemplified below, the alerts may identify the problem or issue and/or what corrective action (if any) may or should be taken.
An alert may include an indication of the alert level (e.g., level 1, level 2, level 3). The alert may include a name or identifier of the alert. The name or descriptive identifier of the alert may include a description of the determined problem that the alert is based on. The alert may include information on the determined problem. The alert may include information about potential causes of the determined problem. The alert may include a recommended further action (e.g., investigate and contact service representative). The alert may include information about who has received the alert. The alert may include an error code and/or error description for the error. The alert may include potential consequences of the error. The alert may include suggested actions for resolving the error.
Level 1 Alert: Burner not Operating.
The system has detected a major concern relating to burner #17. Please investigate and contact service representative. A copy of this alert has been sent to your service representative. Error: Burner inoperable.
Level 2 Alert: Burner Inefficiency.
The system has detected a concern relating to the burner #19. Please investigate and take corrective actions. A copy of this alert has been sent to your service representative. Error: Burner inefficiency. Suggested Actions: Investigate potential causes, and continue operation. May require burner replacement.
Aspects of the disclosure have been described in terms of illustrative embodiments thereof. Numerous other embodiments, modifications, and variations within the scope and spirit of the appended claims will occur to persons of ordinary skill in the art from a review of this disclosure. For example, one or more of the steps illustrated in the illustrative figures may be performed in other than the recited order, and one or more depicted steps may be optional in accordance with aspects of the disclosure.
This application claims the benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) to U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/521,967, filed Jun. 19, 2017, which is incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4159239 | Schwartz | Jun 1979 | A |
4267458 | Uram | May 1981 | A |
4284494 | Bartholic | Aug 1981 | A |
4362614 | Asdigian | Dec 1982 | A |
4380146 | Yannone | Apr 1983 | A |
4385985 | Gross | May 1983 | A |
4411773 | Gross | Oct 1983 | A |
4709546 | Weiler | Dec 1987 | A |
4775460 | Reno | Oct 1988 | A |
4795545 | Schmidt | Jan 1989 | A |
4902469 | Watson | Feb 1990 | A |
5077252 | Owen et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5227121 | Scarola | Jul 1993 | A |
5582684 | Holmqvist et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5605435 | Haugen | Feb 1997 | A |
5616214 | Leclerc | Apr 1997 | A |
5642296 | Saxena | Jun 1997 | A |
5666297 | Britt et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5817517 | Perry et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
6038540 | Krist et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6081230 | Hoshino | Jun 2000 | A |
6230486 | Yasui | May 2001 | B1 |
6266605 | Yasui | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6271845 | Richardson | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6392114 | Shields et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6760716 | Ganesamoorthi et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6772044 | Mathur et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6795798 | Eryurek et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6982032 | Shaffer | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6983227 | Thalhammer-Reyero | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7006889 | Mathur et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7067333 | Pasadyn et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7133807 | Karasawa | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7151966 | Baier et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7246039 | Moorhouse | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7313447 | Hsuing et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7415357 | Stluka et al. | Aug 2008 | B1 |
7567887 | Emigholz et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7742833 | Herbst et al. | Jun 2010 | B1 |
7836941 | Song | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7877596 | Foo Kune et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7925979 | Forney et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7936878 | Kune et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7979192 | Morrison et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7995526 | Liu et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8050889 | Fluegge et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8055371 | Sanford et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8111619 | Liu et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8128808 | Hassan et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8204717 | McLaughlin et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8244384 | Pachner et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8280057 | Budampati et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8352049 | Hsiung et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8354081 | Wheat et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8385436 | Holm et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8428067 | Budampati et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8458778 | Budampati et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8571064 | Kore et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8630962 | Maeda | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8644192 | Budampati et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8811231 | Budampati et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8815152 | Burgess et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8923882 | Gandhi et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8926737 | Chatterjee et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
9053260 | Romatier et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9134717 | Trnka | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9166667 | Thanikachalam | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9176498 | Baramov | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9354631 | Mohideen et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9571919 | Zhang et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9580341 | Brown et al. | Feb 2017 | B1 |
9751817 | Jani et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9864823 | Horn et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9968899 | Gellaboina et al. | May 2018 | B1 |
10095200 | Horn et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10107295 | Brecheisen | Oct 2018 | B1 |
10180680 | Horn et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10183266 | Victor et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10222787 | Romatier et al. | Mar 2019 | B2 |
10328408 | Victor et al. | Jun 2019 | B2 |
20020123864 | Eryurek et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020179495 | Heyse et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020179525 | Shaffer | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030036052 | Delwiche et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030105775 | Shimada | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030147351 | Greenlee | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030223918 | Cammy | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040079392 | Kuechler | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040099572 | Evans | May 2004 | A1 |
20040109788 | Li | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040122273 | Kabin | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040122936 | Mizelle et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040147036 | Krenn et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040148144 | Martin | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040204775 | Keyes | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040204913 | Mueller et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040220689 | Mathur et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040220778 | Imai et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050027721 | Saenz | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050029163 | Letzsch | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050133211 | Osborn et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050216209 | Evans | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060020423 | Sharpe, Jr. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060133412 | Callaghan | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060252642 | Kanazirev | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060259163 | Hsiung et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070020154 | Evans | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070059159 | Hjerpe | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070059838 | Morrison et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070091824 | Budampati et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070091825 | Budampati et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070185664 | Tanaka | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070192078 | Nasle et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070212790 | Welch et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070250292 | Alagappan et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070260656 | Wiig | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070271452 | Foo Kune et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080086322 | Wallace | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080130902 | Foo Kune et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080154434 | Galloway et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080217005 | Stluka et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080282606 | Plaza | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090059786 | Budampati et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090060192 | Budampati et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090064295 | Budampati et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090201899 | Liu et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090204245 | Sustaeta | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090245286 | Kore et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090268674 | Liu et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090281677 | Botich | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100014599 | Holm et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100108567 | Medoff | May 2010 | A1 |
20100125347 | Martin et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100152900 | Gurciullo et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100158764 | Hedrick | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100230324 | Al-Alloush et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100262900 | Romatier et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110112659 | Pachner et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110152590 | Sadler et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110152591 | Sadler et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110174597 | Bartek | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110213488 | Suzuki et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110311014 | Hottovy et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120029966 | Cheewakriengkrai et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120083933 | Subbu et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120095808 | Kattapuram et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120104295 | Do et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120121376 | Huis in Het Veld | May 2012 | A1 |
20120123583 | Hazen et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120197616 | Trnka | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120259583 | Noboa et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130029587 | Gandhi et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130031960 | Delrahim | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130079899 | Baramov | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130090088 | Chevsky | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130094422 | Thanikachalam | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130172643 | Pradeep | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130180175 | Leininger et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130238154 | Noureldin et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130253898 | Meagher et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130270157 | Ferrara | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130311437 | Stluka et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130327052 | O'Neill | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140008035 | Patankar et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140026598 | Trawicki | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140074273 | Mohideen et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140114039 | Benham et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140131027 | Chir | May 2014 | A1 |
20140150438 | Ellis et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140163275 | Yanagawa et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140179968 | Yanagawa et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140212978 | Sharpe, Jr. et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140294683 | Siedler | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140294684 | Siedler | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140296058 | Sechrist et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140309756 | Trygstad | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140337256 | Varadi et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140337277 | Asenjo et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150059714 | Bernards | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150060331 | Sechrist et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150077263 | Ali et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150078970 | Iddir et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150098862 | Lok et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150158789 | Keusenkothen | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150185716 | Wichmann et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150276208 | Maturana et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150284641 | Shi | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150330571 | Beuneken | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20160033941 | T et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160048119 | Wojsznis | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160098037 | Zornio et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160098234 | Weaver | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160102859 | Fisher | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160122663 | Pintart et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160147204 | Wichmann et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160184549 | Bugamelli et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160237910 | Saito | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160260041 | Horn | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160291584 | Horn et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160292188 | Horn et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160292325 | Horn et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160313653 | Mink | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160363315 | Colannino et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170009932 | Oh | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170058213 | Oprins | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170082320 | Wang | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170107188 | Kawaguchi | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170284410 | Sharpe, Jr. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170315543 | Horn et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170323038 | Horn et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170352899 | Asai | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180046155 | Horn et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180081344 | Romatier et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180082569 | Horn et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180121581 | Horn et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180122021 | Horn et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180155638 | Al-Ghamdi | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180155642 | Al-Ghamdi et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180197350 | Kim | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180275690 | Lattanzio et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180275691 | Lattanzio et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180275692 | Lattanzio et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180280914 | Victor et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180280917 | Victor et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180282633 | Van de Cotte et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180282634 | Van de Cotte et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180282635 | Van de Cotte et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180283368 | Van de Cotte et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180283392 | Van de Cotte et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180283404 | Van de Cotte et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180283811 | Victor et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180283812 | Victor et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180283813 | Victor et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180283815 | Victor et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180283816 | Victor et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180283818 | Victor et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180284705 | Van de Cotte et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180286141 | Van de Cotte et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180311609 | McCool et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180362862 | Gellaboina et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20180363914 | Faiella et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20180364747 | Charr et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190002318 | Thakkar et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190003978 | Shi et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190015806 | Gellaboina et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190041813 | Horn et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190083920 | Bjorklund et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190101336 | Victor et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190101342 | Victor et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190101907 | Charr et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190102966 | Lorenz | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190108454 | Banerjee et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190120810 | Kumar et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190151814 | Victor et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190155259 | Romatier et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190258234 | Kaye | Aug 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
105378384 | Mar 2016 | CN |
0181744 | May 1986 | EP |
0488969 | Jun 1992 | EP |
2746884 | Jun 2014 | EP |
2801937 | Nov 2014 | EP |
1134439 | Nov 1968 | GB |
WO 1990010083 | Sep 1990 | WO |
WO 2001060951 | Aug 2001 | WO |
2006044408 | Apr 2006 | WO |
WO 2006044408 | Apr 2006 | WO |
WO 2007095585 | Aug 2007 | WO |
WO 2009046095 | Apr 2009 | WO |
WO 2014042508 | Mar 2014 | WO |
WO 2014123993 | Aug 2014 | WO |
WO 2016141128 | Sep 2016 | WO |
WO 2017079058 | May 2017 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Nov. 22, 2018 (PCT/US) International Search Report—App 2018/038264. |
Bespalov A. V. et al., Control systems of chemical and technological processes, pp. 508-509 (2001) (Russian). |
Daniel Goebel, Dry Gas Seal Contamination During Operation and Pressurization Hold, [online], Feb. 2016, [retrieved on Jun. 19, 2019]. Retrieved from <https ://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/84815277. pdf> (Year: 2016). |
EnergyMEDOR®, Product brochure (Nov. 2014). |
Chistof Huber, Density and Concentration Measurement Application for Novel MEMS-based Micro Densitometer for Gas, [online], 2016, [retrieved on Jun. 19, 2019], Retrieved from <https://www.ama-science.org/proceedings/getFile/ZwZ1 BD==> (Year: 2016). |
Lotters, Real-time Composition Determination of Gas Mixtures, [online], 2015, [retrieved on Jun. 19, 2019], Retrieved from <https:// www .ama-science.org/proceedings/getFile/ZwNOZj==> (Year: 2015). |
Maybeck, Peter S., “Stochastic models, estimation, and control,” vol. 1, Academic Press (1979), 19 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180363914 A1 | Dec 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62521967 | Jun 2017 | US |