The disclosure relates generally to a method and system for managing the operation of a plant, such as a chemical plant or a petrochemical plant, a refinery, or equipment within a plant or refinery, and more particularly to a method for improving the performance of components that make up operations in a plant.
Industrial processes are typically implemented using large numbers of devices, such as pumps, valves, compressors, or other industrial equipment used to implement various aspects of the industrial processes. With these large numbers of devices, scheduled or responsive maintenance needs to be efficient in order to maintain overall efficiency of a plant.
The following summary presents a simplified summary of certain features. The summary is not an extensive overview and is not intended to identify key or critical elements.
One or more embodiments may include a system comprising: one or more sensors configured to measure operating information for a PSA unit; a data collection platform; a data analysis platform; and/or a control platform. The data collection platform may include: one or more processors of the data collection platform; a communication interface in communication with the one or more sensors; and memory storing executable instructions that, when executed, cause the data collection platform to: receive sensor data from the one or more sensors; correlate the sensor data with metadata comprising time data; and transmit the sensor data. The data analysis platform may include: one or more processors of the data analysis platform; and memory storing executable instructions that, when executed, cause the data analysis platform to: receive the sensor data from the data collection platform; analyze the sensor data; transmit the sensor data and calculations to a dashboard; and based on the analyzed sensor data, send a command for an adjustment to an operating condition related to the PSA unit. The control platform may include: one or more processors of the control platform; and memory storing executable instructions that, when executed, cause the control platform to: receive the command for the adjustment to the operating condition related to the PSA unit; and adjust an element of the PSA unit based on the command for the adjustment to the operating condition.
In one or more embodiments, the memory of the data analysis platform stores instructions that, when executed, cause the data analysis platform to: based on the sensor data from the one or more sensors, identify a change in an operating condition of a valve of the PSA unit relative to a same operating condition of a different valve of the PSA unit; and send a command to change an operating parameter of the valve of the PSA unit.
In one or more embodiments, the memory of the data analysis platform stores instructions that, when executed, cause the data analysis platform to: based on the sensor data from the one or more sensors, identify a step change in an operating condition of a valve of the PSA unit relative to a historical operating condition of the valve of the PSA unit; and send a command to change an operating parameter of the valve of the PSA unit.
In one or more embodiments, the memory of the data analysis platform stores instructions that, when executed, cause the data analysis platform to: based on the sensor data from the one or more sensors, predict a remaining life of a valve of the PSA unit; and based on the predicted remaining life of the valve of the PSA unit, generate a recommendation for a maintenance to be performed on the valve of the PSA unit.
In one or more embodiments, the memory of the data analysis platform stores instructions that, when executed, cause the data analysis platform to: perform heuristic analysis on the sensor data from the one or more sensors to determine a recommendation for a maintenance to be performed on the PSA unit.
In one or more embodiments, the memory of the data analysis platform stores instructions that, when executed, cause the data analysis platform to: use the sensor data from the one or more sensors to predict an upcoming maintenance requirement for the PSA unit.
In one or more embodiments, the memory of the data analysis platform stores instructions that, when executed, cause the data analysis platform to: use the sensor data from the one or more sensors to monitor equipment health of the PSA unit.
One or more embodiments may include one or more non-transitory computer-readable media storing instructions that, when executed by one or more processors, cause a system to: receive sensor data from one or more sensors configured to measure operating information for a PSA unit; correlate the sensor data with metadata comprising time data; analyze the sensor data; transmit the sensor data and calculations to a dashboard; and based on the analyzed sensor data, send a command for an adjustment to an operating condition related to the PSA unit.
One or more embodiments may include a method comprising: receiving, by a data analysis computing device, sensor data for a sensor associated with a PSA unit; based on analyzing the sensor data, determining a current operating condition for an element of the PSA unit; determining a difference between the current operating condition for the element of the PSA unit and an optimal operating condition for the element of the PSA unit; displaying the difference between the current operating condition and the optimal operating condition on a dashboard outlining recommendations for adjustments to the element of the PSA unit; based on the analyzed sensor data, determining a command for adjusting the element of the PSA unit to reduce the difference between the current operating condition and the optimal operating condition; and sending the command for adjusting the element of the PSA unit.
Other technical features may be readily apparent to one skilled in the art from the following figures, descriptions, and claims.
The present disclosure is illustrated by way of example and not limited in the accompanying figures in which like reference numerals indicate similar elements and in which:
In the following description of various illustrative embodiments, reference is made to the accompanying drawings, which form a part hereof, and in which is shown, by way of illustration, various embodiments in which aspects of the disclosure may be practiced. It is to be understood that other embodiments may be utilized, and structural and functional modifications may be made, without departing from the scope of the present disclosure. Further, various connections between elements are discussed in the following description. It is noted that these connections are general and, unless specified otherwise, may be direct or indirect, wired or wireless, and that the specification is not intended to be limiting in this respect.
A chemical plant or a petrochemical plant or a refinery may include one or more pieces of equipment that process one or more input chemicals to create one or more products. References herein to a “plant” are to be understood to refer to any of various types of chemical and petrochemical manufacturing or refining facilities. References herein to a plant “operators” are to be understood to refer to and/or include, without limitation, plant planners, managers, engineers, technicians, technical advisors, specialists (e.g., in instrumentation, pipe fitting, and welding), shift personnel, and others interested in, starting up, overseeing, monitoring operations of, and shutting down, the plant.
A piece of equipment commonly used in many petrochemical and refinery processes is a pressure swing adsorption (PSA) unit. Adsorption is the preferential partitioning of substances from the gaseous or liquid phase onto the surface of a solid substrate (adsorbent). Most PSA units are used to recover and purify hydrogen process streams such as from hydrocracking and hydrotreating process streams. But PSA units can also be used to recover and purify helium, methane, monomer, chlorine, and carbon dioxide. Most hydrogen PSA unit applications are used for steam methane reformers, refinery off-gas (Platforming, HC, etc.), and ethylene off-gas. PSA units may accept feeds with purities from about 35% up to 99% and may be designed for a very wide range of product rates.
A typical PSA unit may have a control system containing hardware, software, and human-machine interface for operator interface, and a valve skid containing control valves, piping, and instrumentation. The devices in the valve skid communicate with the control system to operate the PSA. The PSA unit also contains multiple adsorber vessels and a tail gas surge tank. The adsorber vessels contain adsorbents.
There may be any number of adsorber vessels depending on the plant design, for example at least 3 and up to 20 adsorber vessels, often referred to as beds—e.g., a 6 bed polybed PSA unit or a 10 bed polybed PSA unit. Parameters that are monitored include feed flow, feed pressure, feed capacity, recovery, and purity. Loading refers to the quantity of adsorbed material per mass unit of adsorbent.
The PSA unit relies on a pressure swing cycle and the ability of adsorbents to adsorb more impurities at high pressure than at low pressure.
Hydrogen recovery (%) is the quantity of hydrogen in the product stream divided by the quantity of hydrogen in the feed stream. Generally, the higher the number of adsorber units, the greater the percentage of hydrogen recovery. Recovery is maximized through pressure equalizations.
The off-gas or tail-gas stream from a PSA operates at varying flow and composition; hence a surge tank is utilized to dampen flow fluctuations caused by the cyclic nature of the process and provide mixing. Ideally, the resulting tail-gas stream is a constant flow, pressure, temperature off-gas, usually at low pressure. But the cyclic and batch nature of the process causes inherent swings in pressure and flowrate. The feed gas and hydrogen product stream operate at nearly the same pressure. The impurities and some unrecovered hydrogen are rejected at low pressure. The pressure of the tail gas generally has a strong impact on the efficiency of the PSA unit, and hence should be monitored.
An impurity level signal is used to adjust the operation of the PSA unit for optimum recovery, product purity, and maximum capacity. In some embodiments, the system may use a closed loop option. The system may maintain product purity by taking automatic corrective action to the unit's operation before significant levels of impurities can break through into the product gas (feed forward control). For each cycle, a self-tuning function monitors and adjusts the initial opening values of certain valves (PP, BD, Rep) to maintain the most efficient operation. The self-tuning function can adjust for positioner drift, changes in the flow characteristic from the vessels, etc.
The PSA unit can be designed to automatically pressurize each vessel for start-up. Auto pressure start-up helps ensure the smoothest possible start-up with the least operator intervention by automatically ramping each adsorber to the appropriate start-up pressure. Included in automatic capacity control is automatic tail gas flow adjustment to minimize fluctuations in tail gas flow and pressure.
A major advantage of a PSA unit is that it can produce very high purity hydrogen, typical total impurity levels in the product are between 1000 and 10 ppm, or even lower impurity levels. But the process must be carefully monitored in order to achieve and maintain such purity levels.
The process of adsorption and desorption occurs quite rapidly, e.g., every 90 seconds. Hence the pressure in each adsorber vessel increases and decreases rapidly and the valves used in the process must cycle on and off continuously and quickly. As many adsorber vessels may be used in a PSA unit, many valves are utilized in the process. It is critical that such valves operate in an efficient manner. The valves control the drastic changes in pressure that occurs in each adsorber vessel. Each adsorber vessel utilizes three to six valves, for example. Each valve may cycle, for example, 100,000 to 200,000 cycles per year. Thus the process is very abusive on the valves. The specialized valves contain soft seats that break down over time and need to be replaced or rebuilt. Sometimes the valves will stick open or closed resulting in a significant rock to the system.
Often the process will be operated until one or more valves fail (e.g., the valve didn't open or close, or took so long to open or close that the system determined that the valve failed), at which point the affected beds need to be taken offline at an inopportune time in the process. The system may take a pair of beds out of operation—for example, if it is a 10-bed unit, it then runs in 8-bed mode. When the system automatically takes a valve out, it has a potential for shutdown because it is a rough process to take a valve out of operation. Additionally, the plant operators have to scramble to get the valve fixed as soon as possible to return to operating in normal mode. This is not efficient and can be expensive and wasteful.
Alternatively, a data analysis platform may anticipate when valves may break down and take an adsorber offline during an optimal transition time in a cycle. Specifically, by detecting and predicting valve issues ahead of time, the data analysis platform may give warning to do maintenance on the valve in the future. The maintenance can be planned for, the valve vendor can be notified, a replacement valve can be ordered and prepared. Then, when the parts and maintenance workers are ready, and the process is at an appropriate stopping point, the maintenance can be quickly performed (e.g., in 30 minutes instead of five hours or two days), depending on the site and its resources. This allows a smooth transition to another adsorbent vessel.
In one or more embodiments, the PSA adsorbent fully regenerates each cycle, but mis-operation can lead to permanent deactivation. Deactivation will reduce the unit capacity and might not allow for the desired hydrogen purity to be reached.
The present disclosure is directed to providing advance notice for replacing key materials like catalyst or adsorbents or equipment such as valves. Sensors may be used to retrieve and transmit data, and the system may be configured to take one or more actions, such as sending one or more alerts or sounding one or more alarms if certain conditions are met. Additionally, this disclosure is directed to compiling and analyzing operational performance data and efficiently presenting this data (e.g., to a user) with expert recommendations to improve system operations and efficiency.
Suitable sensors include pressure sensors, temperature sensors, flow sensors for feed and product streams, chemical composition analyzers, and liquid level sensors are position throughout the PSA unit, as seen in
In some embodiments, the system may include analyzers on the Feed, Product, and/or Tail Gas lines in order to feed composition data into an analytics engine (e.g., a data analysis platform). Some embodiments may include component-monitoring equipment, such as spectroscopy or gas chromatographs, to monitor the composition of each of the feed, product, and/or tail gas streams. The component-monitoring equipment may enable accurate and timely composition data into the analytics engine, which may increase the accuracy of the analytics calculation. One or more additional metrics and features may also be included.
In some plants, an operational objective may be to improve PSA unit operation on an ongoing and consistent basis. Therefore, a system may deliver timely and/or regular reports indicating current performance, along with interpretation and consulting on what actions may be performed to improve PSA unit performance.
Some plants routinely require technical support in the operation of the plant. Many of these plant operators perform little to no past/present/future analysis on the operation of their plant. This disclosure may solve both of those problems by analyzing plant data and incorporating algorithms and rules to proactively manage the plant and provide advance notice for replacing materials like catalyst, adsorbents, or equipment.
The disclosure ties together plant information with big data and analytics. The disclosure may also empower review of real plant data, which may allow for more accurate fault models based on, e.g., catalyst adsorbent materials. Ultimately, the disclosure may result in a more robust product tailored for a specific plant. The advantages that can be achieved are numerous and rooted in both new product development and optimization of plants.
The present disclosure incorporates technical service know-how and utilizes automated rules rather than engineers reviewing data. The present disclosure provides assurance that unit is operating at optimum purity/recovery while protecting adsorbent load, including capacity/purity monitoring; unit on-stream percentage; switchover history/time in each mode; process alarm tracking and diagnostics; dashboard links to electronic operating manual. The present disclosure also provides maximizing on stream time by recording, identifying, and scheduling maintenance activities, including valve cycle count and time since last maintenance; identifying suspected leaking valves; advanced valve diagnostics (open/close speed, overshoot, etc.); vessel cycle count; spare parts information/ordering support; control panel software updates. The present disclosure also provides quick resolution of unplanned downtime, including Technical Service group having access to internal dashboard for each plant, including access to preconfigured trends, displays, and historical data—no data exchange needed.
The system may include one or more computing devices or platforms for collecting, storing, processing, and analyzing data from one or more sensors.
Although the computing system environment 500 of
In yet another example, the data collection platform 502, data analysis platform 504, and/or control platform 506 may reside on a single server computer or virtual machine and be depicted as a single, combined logical box on a system diagram. Moreover, a data store may be illustrated in
Referring to
In addition, sensors may include transmitters and deviation alarms. These sensors may be programmed to set off an alarm, which may be audible and/or visual. Alternatively or additionally, an alert may be sent, such as via email, text message, application alert, or the like.
Other sensors may transmit signals to a processor or a hub that collects the data and sends to a processor. For example, temperature and pressure measurements may be sent to a hub (e.g., data collection platform 502, control platform 506). In one example, temperature sensors 518 may include thermocouples, fiber optic temperature measurement, thermal cameras 519, and/or infrared cameras. Skin thermocouples may be applied to tubes or placed directly on a wall of an adsorption unit. Alternatively, thermal (infrared) cameras 519 may be used to detect temperature (e.g., hot spots) in one or more aspects of the equipment, including tubes. A shielded (insulated) tube skin thermocouple assembly may be used to obtain accurate measurements. One example of a thermocouple may be a removable XTRACTO Pad. A thermocouple can be replaced without any additional welding. Clips and/or pads may be utilized for ease of replacement. Fiber Optic cable can be attached to a unit, line, or vessel to provide a complete profile of temperatures.
Furthermore, flow sensors 523 may be used in flow paths such as the inlet to the path, outlet from the path, or within the path. If multiple tubes are utilized, the flow sensors 523 may be placed in corresponding positions in each of the tubes. In this manner, one can determine if one of the tubes is behaving abnormally compared to other tubes. Flow may be determined by pressure-drop across a known resistance, such as by using pressure taps. Other types of flow sensors 523 include, but are not limited to, ultrasonic, turban meter, hot wire anemometer, vane meter, Kármá™, vortex sensor, membrane sensor (membrane has a thin film temperature sensor printed on the upstream side, and one on the downstream side), tracer, radiographic imaging (e.g., identify two-phase vs. single-phase region of channels), an orifice plate in front of or integral to each tube or channel, pitot tube, thermal conductivity flow meter, anemometer, internal pressure flow profile, and/or measure cross tracer (measuring when the flow crosses one plate and when the flow crosses another plate).
Moisture level sensors 525 may be used to monitor moisture levels at one or more locations. For example, moisture levels at an outlet may be measured.
A gas chromatograph on the feed to the PSA unit can be used to speciate the various components to provide empirical data to be used in calculations.
Sensor data, process measurements, and/or calculations made using the sensor data or process measurements may be used to monitor and/or improve the performance of the equipment and parts making up the equipment, as discussed in further detail below. For example, sensor data may be used to detect that a desirable or an undesirable chemical reaction is taking place within a particular piece of equipment, and one or more actions may be taken to encourage or inhibit the chemical reaction. Chemical sensors may be used to detect the presence of one or more chemicals or components in the streams, such as corrosive species, oxygen, hydrogen, and/or water (moisture). Chemical sensors may utilize gas chromatographs, liquid chromatographs, distillation measurements, and/or octane measurements. In another example, equipment information, such as wear, efficiency, production, state, or other condition information, may be gathered and determined based on sensor data.
Corrective action may be taken based on determining this equipment information. For example, if the equipment is showing signs of wear or failure, corrective actions may be taken, such as taking an inventory of parts to ensure replacement parts are available, ordering replacement parts, and/or calling in repair personnel to the site. Certain parts of equipment may be replaced immediately. Other parts may be safe to continue to use, but a monitoring schedule may be adjusted. Alternatively or additionally, one or more inputs or controls relating to a process may be adjusted as part of the corrective action. For example, control platform 506 may adjust one or more pumps 528 or valves 529, which may cause an adjustment to a temperature, a pressure, a flow rate, or the like. These and other details about the equipment, sensors, processing of sensor data, and actions taken based on sensor data are described in further detail below.
Monitoring the PSA units and the processes using PSA units may include collecting data that can be correlated and used to predict behavior or problems in different PSA units used in the same plant or in other plants and/or processes. Data collected from the various sensors (e.g., measurements such as flow, pressure drop, thermal performance, vessel skin temperature at the top, vibration) may be correlated with external data, such as environmental or weather data. Process changes or operating conditions may be able to be altered to preserve the equipment until the next scheduled maintenance period. Fluids may be monitored for corrosive contaminants and pH may be monitored in order to predict higher than normal corrosion rates within the PSA equipment. At a high level, sensor data collected (e.g., by the data collection platform, control platform) and data analysis (e.g., by the data analysis platform) may be used together, for example, for process simulation, equipment simulation, and/or other tasks. For example, sensor data may be used for process simulation and reconciliation of sensor data. The resulting improved process simulation may provide a stream of physical properties that may be used to calculate heat flow, etc. These calculations may lead to thermal and pressure drop performance prediction calculations for specific equipment, and comparisons of equipment predictions to observations from the operating data (e.g., predicted/expected outlet temperature and pressure vs. measured outlet temperature and pressure). This may enable identification of one or issues that may eventually lead to a potential control changes and/or recommendations, etc.
Sensor data may be collected by a data collection platform 502. In one or more embodiments, the data collection platform 502 may be part of the control platform 506 (e.g., the sensors may send data directly to the control platform 506). The sensors may interface with the data collection platform 502 via wired or wireless transmissions. Sensor data (e.g., temperature data) may be collected continuously or at periodic intervals (e.g., every second, every five seconds, every ten seconds, every minute, every five minutes, every ten minutes, every hour, every two hours, every five hours, every twelve hours, every day, every other day, every week, every other week, every month, every other month, every six months, every year, or another interval). Data may be collected at different locations at different intervals. For example, data at a known hot spot may be collected at a first interval, and data at a spot that is not a known hot spot may be collected at a second interval. The data collection platform 502 may continuously or periodically (e.g., every second, every minute, every hour, every day, once a week, once a month) transmit collected sensor data to a data analysis platform 504, which may be nearby or remote from the data collection platform 502.
The computing system environment 500 of
In addition, the platform and/or devices in
Furthermore, the platform and/or devices in
In some examples, one or more sensor devices in
Referring to
Data collection platform 502 may include or be in communication with one or more data historians 538. The data historian 538 may be implemented as one or more software modules, one or more virtual machines, or one or more hardware elements (e.g., servers). The data historian 538 may collect data at regular intervals (e.g., every minute, every two minutes, every ten minutes, every thirty minutes).
The data historian 538 may include or be in communication with a process scout 539. The process scout 539 may be implemented as one or more software modules, one or more virtual machines, or one or more hardware elements (e.g., servers). The process scout 539 may work with or in place of the data collection module 537 and/or the data historian 538 to handle one or more aspects of data replication.
Although the elements of
In addition, the data collection module 537 may assist the processor 534 in the data collection platform 502 in communicating with, via the communications interface 540, and processing data received from other sources, such as data feeds from third-party servers and manual entry at the field site from a dashboard graphical user interface. For example, a third-party server may provide contemporaneous weather data to the data collection module. Some elements of chemical and petrochemical/refinery plants may be exposed to the outside and thus may be exposed to various environmental stresses. Such stresses may be weather related such as temperature extremes (hot and cold), high wind conditions, and precipitation conditions such as snow, ice, and rain. Other environmental conditions may be pollution particulates such as dust and pollen, or salt if located near an ocean, for example. Such stresses can affect the performance and lifetime of equipment in the plants. Different locations may have different environmental stresses. For example, a refinery in Texas will have different stresses than a chemical plant in Montana. In another example, data manually entered from a dashboard graphical user interface (or other means) may be collected and saved into memory by the data collection module. Production rates may be entered and saved in memory. Tracking production rates may indicate issues with flows. For example, as fouling occurs, the production rate may fall if a specific outlet temperature can no longer be achieved at the targeted capacity and capacity has to be reduced to maintain the targeted outlet temperature.
Referring to
In addition, the data analysis platform 504 may include a data acquisition tool 544. In some embodiments, the data acquisition tool 544 may comprise computer-executable instructions that, when executed by the processor, cause the data analysis platform to perform one or more of the steps disclosed herein. In other embodiments, the data acquisition tool 544 may be a virtual machine. In some embodiments, the data acquisition tool 544 may be a hybrid of software-based and/or hardware-based instructions to perform one or more of the steps disclosed herein.
Further, the data analysis platform 504 may include a data service 545. In some embodiments, the data service 545 may comprise computer-executable instructions that, when executed by the processor, cause the data analysis platform to perform one or more of the steps disclosed herein. In other embodiments, the data service 545 may be a virtual machine. In some embodiments, the data service 545 may be a hybrid of software-based and/or hardware-based instructions to perform one or more of the steps disclosed herein.
Also, the data analysis platform may include a data historian 546. In some embodiments, the data historian 546 may comprise computer-executable instructions that, when executed by the processor, cause the data analysis platform to perform one or more of the steps disclosed herein. In other embodiments, the data historian 546 may be a virtual machine. In some embodiments, the data historian 546 may be a hybrid of software-based and/or hardware-based instructions to perform one or more of the steps disclosed herein. The data historian 546 may collect data at regular intervals (e.g., every minute, every two minutes, every ten minutes, every thirty minutes).
Additionally, the data analysis platform 504 may include a data lake 547. In some embodiments, the data lake 547 may comprise computer-executable instructions that, when executed by the processor, cause the data analysis platform to perform one or more of the steps disclosed herein. In other embodiments, the data lake 547 may be a virtual machine. In some embodiments, the data lake 547 may be a hybrid of software-based and/or hardware-based instructions to perform one or more of the steps disclosed herein. The data lake 547 may perform relational data storage. The data lake 547 may provide data in a format that may be useful for processing data and/or performing data analytics.
Moreover, the data analysis platform 504 may include a calculations service 548. In some embodiments, the calculations service 548 may comprise computer-executable instructions that, when executed by the processor, cause the data analysis platform to perform one or more of the steps disclosed herein. In other embodiments, the calculations service 548 may be a virtual machine. In some embodiments, the calculations service 548 may be a hybrid of software-based and/or hardware-based instructions to perform one or more of the steps disclosed herein. The calculations service 548 may collect data, perform calculations, and/or provide key performance indicators. The calculations service 548 may implement, for example, process dynamic modeling software or tools (e.g., UniSim).
Furthermore, the data analysis platform 504 may include a utility service 549. In some embodiments, the utility service 549 may comprise computer-executable instructions that, when executed by the processor, cause the data analysis platform to perform one or more of the steps disclosed herein. In other embodiments, the utility service 549 may be a virtual machine. In some embodiments, the utility service 549 may be a hybrid of software-based and/or hardware-based instructions to perform one or more of the steps disclosed herein. The utility service 549 may take information from the calculations service 548 and put the information into the data lake 547. The utility service 549 may provide data aggregation service, such as taking all data for a particular range, normalizing the data (e.g., determining an average), and/or combining the normalized data into a file to send to another system or module.
One or more components of the data analysis platform 504 may assist the processor in the data analysis platform in processing and analyzing the data values stored in the database. In some embodiments, the data analysis platform 504 may perform statistical analysis, predictive analytics, and/or machine learning on the data values in the database to generate predictions and models. For example, the data analysis platform 504 may analyze sensor data to detect new hot spots and/or to monitor existing hot spots (e.g., to determine if an existing hot spot is growing, maintaining the same size, or shrinking) in the equipment of a plant. The data analysis platform 504 may compare temperature data from different dates to determine if changes are occurring. Such comparisons may be made on a monthly, weekly, daily, hourly, real-time, or some other basis.
The data analysis platform 504 may generate recommendations for adjusting one or more parameters for the operation of the plant environment depicted in
Although the elements of
Referring to
The control platform 506 may include a local analytics module 556. In some embodiments, a control program (e.g., that runs PSA processes) may include an embedded analytics module. Calculating analytics locally (e.g., rather than remotely on the cloud) may provide some benefits, such as increased response time for providing real-time information to local plant systems. For example, if a thousand valves that each open and close 10 times a second are each providing operating information to the local control platform, the sheer volume of data may introduce a delay in calculating short-term maintenance-required calculations, analytics, or alerts if there is not sufficient bandwidth between the plant and the remote cloud processing system. Thus, a subset of the analytics data (e.g., analytics data relevant to realtime operating information, equipment for which a delayed failure alert may result in a catastrophic failure, or the like) may be processed and provided locally, while other data (e.g., analytics data related to long-time trends, historical analytics data, or the like) may be sent to a cloud platform for processing. In some embodiments, all the data is sent to the cloud, including the data that is processed locally. The data processed locally may be used for providing realtime information, such as alerts or control system changes, and sent to the cloud for logging, storage, long-term or historical trends analysis, or the like. The local version of the data may be discarded after a certain time period. In some embodiments, all data may be processed locally. Local and/or cloud data may be combined on a dashboard, or alternatively may be provided on separate dashboards.
In a plant environment such as illustrated in
Referring to
Although
Although the elements of
Referring to
At the stack level, the cloud-computing infrastructure may provide a secure, scalable infrastructure for collecting, aggregating and storing data, allowing connected “things” to communicate, making an offering/SaaS solution available, IaaS/PaaS, and/or data lakes.
Different devices, systems, and/or platforms may be connected via the cloud or direct, remote connection (e.g., Lyric Thermostat, SaaS). Furthermore, the disclosure may include infrastructure enabling connected services (e.g., Sentience).
The aforementioned cloud computing infrastructure may use a data collection platform 502 (such as process scout) associated with a plant to capture data, e.g., sensor measurements, which may be automatically sent to the cloud infrastructure, which may be remotely located, where it is reviewed to, for example, eliminate errors and biases, and used to calculate and report performance results. The data collection platform 502 may include an optimization unit that acquires data from a customer site, other site, and/or plant (e.g., sensors and other data collectors at a plant) on a recurring basis. For cleansing, the data may be analyzed for completeness and corrected for gross errors by the optimization unit. The data may also be corrected for measurement issues (e.g., an accuracy problem for establishing a simulation steady state) and overall mass balance closure to generate a duplicate set of reconciled plant data. The corrected data may be used as an input to a simulation process, in which the process model is tuned to ensure that the simulation process matches the reconciled plant data. An output of the reconciled plant data may be used to generate predicted data using a collection of virtual process model objects as a unit of process design.
The performance of the plant and/or individual process units of the plant may be compared to the performance predicted by one or more process models to identify any operating differences or gaps. Furthermore, the process models and collected data (e.g., plant operation information) may be used to run optimization routines that converge on an optimal plant operation for a given values of, e.g., feed, products, and/or prices. A routine may be understood to refer to a sequence of computer programs or instructions for performing a particular task.
The data analysis platform 502 may comprise an analysis unit that determines operating status, based on at least one of a kinetic model, a parametric model, an analytical tool, and a related knowledge and best practice standard. The analysis unit may receive historical and/or current performance data from one or a plurality of plants to proactively predict future actions to be performed. To predict various limits of a particular process and stay within the acceptable range of limits, the analysis unit may determine target operational parameters of a final product based on actual current and/or historical operational parameters. This evaluation by the analysis unit may be used to proactively predict future actions to be performed. In another example, the analysis unit may establish a boundary or threshold of an operating parameter of the plant based on at least one of an existing limit and an operation condition. In yet another example, the analysis unit may establish a relationship between at least two operational parameters related to a specific process for the operation of the plant. Finally in yet another example, one or more of the aforementioned examples may be performed with or without a combination of the other examples.
The plant process model may predict plant performance that is expected based upon plant operation information. The plant process model results can be used to monitor the health of the plant and to determine whether any upset or poor measurement occurred. The plant process model may be generated by an iterative process that models at various plant constraints to determine the desired plant process model.
Using a web-based system for implementing the method of this disclosure provides many benefits, such as improved plant economic performance due to an increased ability by plant operators to identify and capture economic opportunities, a sustained ability to bridge plant performance gaps, and an increased ability to leverage personnel expertise and improve training and development. Some of the methods disclosed herein allow for automated daily evaluation of process performance, thereby increasing the frequency of performance review with less time and effort required from plant operations staff.
Further, the analytics unit may be partially or fully automated. In one embodiment, the system may be performed by a computer system, such as a third-party computer system, remote from the plant and/or the plant planning center. The system may receive signals and parameters via the communication network, and displays in real time related performance information on an interactive display device accessible to an operator or user. The web-based platform allows all users to work with the same information, thereby creating a collaborative environment for sharing best practices or for troubleshooting. The method further provides more accurate prediction and optimization results due to fully configured models. Routine automated evaluation of plant planning and operation models allows timely plant model tuning to reduce or eliminate gaps between plant models and the actual plant performance. Implementing the aforementioned methods using the web-based platform also allows for monitoring and updating multiple sites, thereby better enabling facility planners to propose realistic optimal targets.
As shown in
Aspects of the present disclosure are directed to monitoring PSA unit processes for potential and existing issues, providing alerts, and/or adjusting operating conditions to optimize PSA unit life. There are many process performance indicators that may be monitored including, but not limited to, flow rates, chemical analyzers, temperature, and/or pressure. In addition, valve operation may be monitored, including opening speed, closing speed, and performance.
In some embodiments, a system may determine operating characteristics. The system may determine system performance characteristics. The system may determine optimal operating characteristics. In some embodiments, the optimal operating characteristics may be based on a designed-for operating level, a regulation (e.g., a minimum hydrogen purity), or one or more other criteria. The system may determine whether there is a difference between recent operating performance and the optimal operating performance. If there is a difference, the system may suggest adjusting one or more operating characteristics to decrease the difference between the actual operating performance in the recent and the optimal operating performance.
In some embodiments, the system may automatically adjust the one or more operating characteristics. Alternatively or additionally, the system may provide an alert or other information to a remote device (e.g., a mobile device of an operator), with a request to adjust the one or more operating characteristics and/or to take another necessary action to optimize performance. In one example the system may transfer operation of one adsorbent unit to another adsorbent unit in order to replace a valve or replace contaminated adsorbent.
Periodically, the system may determine whether there is a difference between the actual operating performance and the optimal performance, and if so, again adjust operating characteristics to decrease the difference. Alternatively or additionally, in some embodiments, the system may notify the operator to take necessary action to optimize the performance.
For example, the system may provide a recommendation or set of recommendations to improve operations of the unit. In one or more embodiments, the system may provide an alert recommending that some action is taken (e.g., perform maintenance on Valve XXX). Additionally, in one or more embodiments, with the different Process Indicators being tracked on the dashboard, the system may provide a summary that may include an explanation of the takeaway message of the impact of operating in a particular manner.
For example: Product Purity. A unit may be designed for 99.9% Hydrogen Purity. The plant may be operating at 99.95% Hydrogen Purity. This operation is conservative and is impacting the plant's Hydrogen recovery by X. The system may determine and/or recommend that, to operate at the design recovery level, an adjustment to Y and Z. This recommendation may be displayed on the dashboard, delivered as an alert, and/or sent to the control platform to be implemented.
By iteratively reviewing recent performance and adjusting characteristics, the system may thereby optimize the operating performance for a PSA unit. This may result in improved performance, e.g., extend valve life, extend adsorbent life, reduce energy use, optimize plant output.
One or more calculations may be performed for PSA unit remote monitoring service. These calculations may assist in alerting and helping diagnose the status of valves and other components used in PSA units. A PSA unit may over 100 valves, all cycling extremely fast. The valves may last an average of 3 to 5 years. But some may last only two years, while some may last ten years. But eventually all the valves wear out because they're opening and closing so fast so many times. The data processing platform may monitor valve performance and identify before a valve fails.
The data processing platform may receive (e.g., from one or more sensors) one or more operational parameters, which may be used alone or in combination for determining the efficiency of the PSA units, e.g., adsorber vessels. For example, one or more operational parameters may include (e.g., for a valve) an amount of overshoot, a number of oscillations, a lag between a feedback and an output, an open time, a stroke time, a close time. As discussed previously, the system may collect sensor information, put it into data traps, and send it through the system, such that the system can review and analyze high-speed information based on regular (e.g., one-minute) data pulls.
The data processing platform may perform heuristic analysis on the sensor data. The data processing platform may analyze the sensor data to look for variations in the data over time. E.g., the data analysis platform may determine a minor change in a way the valve operates over time, based on having collected and analyzed data on thousands of valve operations. The data analysis platform may receive data from one plant or from multiple plants. Valves with partially or wholly similar specifications (e.g., the soft goods, the positioners, the actuators, the complete build itself (every single component identical) may be used at a variety of plants, multiple of which send valve operating information to the data processing platform. The data analysis platform may identify a minor change as being an indicator of a failure that is coming.
In one or more embodiments, the data processing platform may determine whether values in the sensor data exceed certain thresholds. As an example, the data processing platform may analyze valve data to see if a particular valve operation deviates from an average operation of other valves in similar service (e.g., in a same piece of equipment, in a same plant, in a same piece of equipment at a different plant, or the like).
Alternatively or additionally, the data processing platform may look for a step change in operating parameter. For example, if a valve was taking three seconds to open, then suddenly starts taking four or five seconds to open, the data processing platform may flag that valve as a valve that may fail soon in the future. Thus, the data processing platform may help identify valves before they fail.
The data processing platform may perform online or offline data analytics to identify when there has been discrete failures for valves. The data processing platform may analyze the data leading up to a valve failure to identify patterns—what is the opening time, the close time, the oscillations, etc. In one or more embodiments, one or more third-party tools may be used to help with pattern recognition, to help identify events that occurred, to find common patterns that lead up to a failure, or the like.
The data processing platform may use one or more design parameters, alone or in combination, for determining the status of the PSA unit. A design parameter may be a level at which the PSA unit was designed to operate at, below, or above. For example, a PSA unit may be designed to achieve 99.99% hydrogen purity.
The data processing platform may analyze the sensor data to determine new thresholds. For example, a valve vendor may say the valve is good for 500 k strokes. At 500 k strokes, one or more warnings may be provided—e.g., the valve may need preventative maintenance, based solely on stroke count. Some plants may ignore recommended operating thresholds, and run the valve straight to failure. The data processing platform may analyze valve failures in those conditions, and determine a new threshold based on actual failure time. For example, the data processing platform may determine that a valve that has a recommended life of 500 k strokes, in typical use, frequently lasts until 650 k strokes before failing. Thus, the data processing platform may determine and provide a new recommended operating threshold of 650 k strokes (or 300 k, or whatever the actual data shows). In other embodiments, the data analysis platform may identify commonalities among failures of other pieces of equipment, and use those identified commonalities to update thresholds to make them more accurate.
The data processing platform, when analyzing equipment, may take into account similarities or differences between different pieces of equipment. For example, the data processing platform may take into account a positioner model, a size on an actuator, or the like. Sensor data may include or be tagged with equipment information. As an example, sensor data from a valve may include complete valve build information—including actuator sizes, model numbers, valve body material, stem material, bearing material—or the like. The equipment information may be built into a model so the data processing platform can do more detailed analytics to look for commonalities.
Thus, edge data collection may be combined with monitoring and cloud analytics to provide new recommendations for operating parameters or conditions.
In one or more embodiments, the data processing platform may adjust data analysis based on an accumulated error between a feedback and an output command. The data processing platform may allow certain tolerances.
In some instances, the timestamp of a calculated attribute may match the timestamp of the raw data used for the calculation. In some instances, a calculated attribute may use one or more results of one or more other calculated attributes; therefore, the order in which the attributes are calculated may be relevant.
In some embodiments, raw values may be checked for bad values. If bad values are detected, the data processing platform may either skip calculation or replace the bad value with NULL, as appropriate for subsequent calculations. For averages, a provision may be made to skip bad/null values and/or timestamps.
Some units of measurement for variables may be specified. Some variables may be dimensionless, and therefore might not have a defined unit of measurement.
The dashboard may be different based on an intended user of the dashboard. For example, as depicted in
Returning to
The dashboard may display the information for a particular time or period of time (e.g., the last five minutes, the last ten minutes, the last hour, the last two hours, the last 12 hours, the last 24 hours, multiple days, multiple months). The dashboard may be adjustable to show different ranges of time, automatically or based on user input.
The dashboard may include a contact name and/or contact information (e.g., telephone number, pager number, email address, text message number, social media account name) for a sales representative. Then, for example, if a dashboard user needs assistance (e.g., purchasing more equipment, seeking assistance for repairs, finding out more information about purchased products), the dashboard user may easily contact the sales representative.
The dashboard may include a contact name and/or contact information for technical support. Then, for example, if the dashboard user using the dashboard needs assistance (e.g., interpreting dashboard data, adjusting a product level, adjusting an equipment setting, adjusting an operating characteristic), the dashboard user may easily contact technical support.
The dashboard may display a time and/or date range of the time and/or date range for which data is being displayed. A pop-up window may be triggered (e.g., by selecting an interface option, such as a drop-down arrow) to change a time period. The pop-up window may allow selection of a time period (e.g., years, quarters, months, weeks, days, hours, minutes) for displaying data. The pop-up window may allow selection of a range of data for a selected time (e.g., previous week, this week, next week, last x number of weeks, next x number of weeks, week to date).
The dashboard may include, on one or more graphs, a line indicating an optimum operating level. Specifically, the line may indicate, based on one or more calculations, an optimum level at which a particular PSA unit should be operated (e.g., relative to a particular operating characteristic) to achieve an optimization goal. The optimum operating level may be dynamic, based on a re-calculation of an optimum operating level using one or more operational and/or design characteristics. In an example, the optimization goal may be to optimize a life of the PSA unit, adsorbent, or valve, or the like.
The dashboard may include, on one or more graphs, a line indicating a design level. Specifically, the line may indicate the level at which the equipment was designed to operate. The design line may be static. The design line may be based on an actual operating condition of another factor. The design line may be provided by, e.g., an entity associated with a design of the equipment, the plant, or the like.
The dashboard may include, on one or more graphs, a line, bar, or other indicator of an actual operating result. The actual operating result may be related to a time and/or date range (e.g., the displayed time and/or date range). For example, the graph may indicate PSA subcycle time and capacity factor of the PSA; purity; recovery; or tail gas pressure swing. The number of cycles can be specified. The actual operating result line may be dynamic.
The dashboard may include one or more colored banners or shapes that may correspond to one or more current operating conditions corresponding to one or more graphs of the dashboard. The colored banners or shapes may include one or more colors (e.g., green, yellow, red), which may correspond to one or more operating conditions of PSA equipment. For example, 708 shows a simple layout of PSA with selectable valves and vessels to view more details on status of particular pieces of equipment. For example, a circle may correspond to a valve. A rectangle may correspond to a vessel. The dashboard may further include icons corresponding to a product stream, a tail gas stream, and/or a feed stream. If a valve or vessel is at an acceptable level or state, the colored banner or shape may be green. If the valve or vessel is at a level or state that necessitates increased monitoring or that may indicate an impending need (e.g., maintenance), the colored banner or shape may be yellow. If the valve or vessel is at a problematic level or state, the colored banner or shape may be red.
The depicted vessels and/or valves may provide additional information in response to a received input. For example, if an input includes hovering over a particular vessel icon, additional information about that vessel may be displayed. If the input includes clicking or tapping on a particular vessel icon, even more information about that vessel may be displayed. Similarly, if an input includes hovering over a particular valve icon, additional information about that valve may be displayed. If the input includes clicking or tapping on a particular valve icon, even more information about that valve may be displayed. For example, information may include health status of a vessel or valve, the number of openings/closings of the valve over its life, information on adsorbent in a vessel, identification of an impending maintenance need of the vessel or valve, or the like.
The depicted streams (e.g., product stream, tail gas stream, and/or feed stream) may provide information about the particular stream (e.g., in response to a input, such as a hover, selection, tap, click). For example, the information may include an indication of a stream makeup (e.g., how much of a particular chemical is in a particular stream), a purity, a pressure, a flow rate, or the like of the stream.
The dashboard may include a graph 710 that shows hydrogen purity to see where the system has been operating over a certain selectable timeline. The graph may include a first line that indicates an ideal or desired level, and a second line that indicates an actual operating level. The graph may correspond with a colored banner at the bottom of the screen. The banner may indicate if the hydrogen purity is within in a suitable range (e.g., green), a lower but acceptable range (e.g., yellow), or is out of range (e.g., red).
The dashboard may include a graph 712 that shows hydrogen recovery to see where the system has been operating over a certain selectable timeline. The graph may include a first line that indicates an ideal or desired level, and a second line that indicates an actual operating level. The graph may correspond with a colored banner at the bottom of the screen. The banner may indicate if the hydrogen recovery is within in a suitable range (e.g., green), a lower but acceptable range (e.g., yellow), or is out of range (e.g., red).
The dashboard may include a graph 714 that shows PSA subcycle time and capacity factor of the PSA over a period of time for easily viewable history. The graph may include a first line that indicates an ideal or desired level and a second line that indicates an actual operating level. The graph may correspond with a colored banner at the bottom of the dashboard. The banner may indicate if the subcycle time is in a suitable range (e.g., green), an acceptable range (e.g., yellow), or is out of range (e.g., red).
The dashboard may include a graph 716 that shows tail gas pressure swing with variance area for the tail gas distribution within a certain number of PSA cycles. The number of cycles can be specified. There may also be points or flags for PSA events such as upstream/downstream process events, switchovers, and significant system alarms. The graph may depict O2 concentration in the stack over a time period (e.g., six weeks).
The dashboard may have an equipment health section 718 that shows the status of the equipment based on the equipment selected in the layout of 708. Equipment health section 718 may display measurements/calculations of one or more variables, as depicted in
As depicted in
Product stream information may include, for example, Purity, Recovery, Key Impurity Component composition (% or ppm), Performance Alert, Pressure vs design, Temperature.
Vessel information may include, for example, Cycle Count, Vessel Install Date, Adsorbent Load Date, Vessel DP vs Average, Number of alarms associated with the vessel vs average, Control loop performance, Leak detection, Adsorbent Health Report, Lifting Alert.
Tail gas stream information may include, for example, Average pressure vs design, Peak to peak pressure swing.
Feed stream information may include, for example, Pressure vs Design, Flow rate vs design, Temperature vs design, Knockout Drum Level.
Returning to
The data collected by the system may provide real time and/or historical information regarding events, operations, and/or data. This information can be modelled to predict and/or anticipate future issues. This can be used to call for proactive maintenance actions and/or make corrective actions to the operation of the process unit to have an uninterrupted service.
The dashboard may include a button or option that allows a user to send data to one or more other devices. For example, the user may be able to send data via email, SMS, text message, iMessage, FTP, cloud sharing, AirDrop, or some other method. The user may be able to select one or more pieces of data, graphics, charts, graphs, elements of the display, or the like to share or send.
In some embodiments, a graphical user interface of an application may be used for providing alerts and/or receiving or generating commands for taking corrective action related to PSA, in accordance with one or more embodiments described herein. The graphical user interface may include an alert or alarm summary with information about a current state of a piece of equipment (e.g., a valve), a problem being experienced by a piece of equipment (e.g., a valve), a problem with a plant, or the like. For example, the graphical user interface may include an alert that a valve is experiencing a particular issue, a particular problem has been detected, or another alert.
A PSA alarm summary 720 may allow include an alarm log, which may enable troubleshooting PSA specific alarms.
An alarm health section 722 may create a decision tree based on one or more selected alarms from the alarm summary section 720. The decision tree may provide guided troubleshooting analysis leveraging embedded expertise.
The graphical user interface may include one or more buttons that, when pressed, cause one or more actions to be taken. For example, the graphical user interface may include a button that, when pressed, causes an operating characteristic (e.g., of a valve, of a plant, or the like) to change. For example, the computer may send a signal that opens or closes one or more valves or adjusts one or more flow controllers in response to a particular condition being detected. In another example, the graphical user interface may include a button that, when pressed, sends an alert to a contact, the alert including information similar to the information included in the alert provided via the graphical user interface. For example, an alert may be sent to one or more devices, and one or more users of those devices may cause those devices to send alerts, further information, and/or instructions to one or more other devices. In a further example, the graphical user interface may include a button that, when pressed, shows one or more other actions that may be taken (e.g., additional corrective actions, adjustments to operating conditions).
Several levels of alerts may be utilized. One level of alerts may be for alerts that require emergency action (e.g., Level 1). Another level of alerts may be for alerts that require action, but not immediate action (e.g., Level 2). Another level of alerts may be for alerts that are not related to the PSA unit (e.g., Level 3). A number of illustrative alerts are described below. These alerts are merely illustrative, and the disclosure is not limited to these alerts. Instead, these are merely examples of some of the types of alerts that may be related to, e.g., a PSA unit. As exemplified below, the alerts may identify the problem or issue and/or what corrective action (if any) may or should be taken.
An alert may include an indication of the alert level (e.g., level 1, level 2, level 3). The alert may include a name or identifier of the alert. The name or descriptive identifier of the alert may include a description of the determined problem that the alert is based on. The alert may include information on the determined problem. The alert may include information about potential causes of the determined problem. The alert may include a recommended further action (e.g., investigate and contact service representative). The alert may include information about who has received the alert. The alert may include an error code and/or error description for the error. The alert may include potential consequences of the error. The alert may include suggested actions for resolving the error.
The system has detected a major concern relating to valve #17. Please investigate and contact service representative. A copy of this alert has been sent to your service representative. Error: Valve not operating.
The system has detected a concern relating to the valve #19. Please investigate and take corrective actions. A copy of this alert has been sent to your service representative. Error: Valve inefficiency. Suggested Actions: Investigate potential causes, and continue operation. May require valve replacement.
Aspects of the disclosure have been described in terms of illustrative embodiments thereof. Numerous other embodiments, modifications, and variations within the scope and spirit of the appended claims will occur to persons of ordinary skill in the art from a review of this disclosure. For example, one or more of the steps illustrated in the illustrative figures may be performed in other than the recited order, and one or more depicted steps may be optional in accordance with aspects of the disclosure.
This application claims the benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) to U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/560,014, filed Sep. 18, 2017, which is incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4380146 | Yannone | Apr 1983 | A |
4775460 | Reno | Oct 1988 | A |
4795545 | Schmidt | Jan 1989 | A |
5077252 | Owen et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5605435 | Haugen | Feb 1997 | A |
5666297 | Britt et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5817517 | Perry et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
6038540 | Krist et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6392114 | Shields et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6760716 | Ganesamoorthi et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6772044 | Mathur et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6795798 | Eryurek et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
7006889 | Mathur et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7067333 | Pasadyn et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7133807 | Karasawa | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7151966 | Baier et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7246039 | Moorhouse | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7313447 | Hsuing et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7415357 | Stluka et al. | Aug 2008 | B1 |
7567887 | Emigholz et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7742833 | Herbst et al. | Jun 2010 | B1 |
7877596 | Foo Kune et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7925979 | Forney et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7936878 | Kune et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7979192 | Morrison et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7995526 | Liu et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8050889 | Fluegge et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8055371 | Sanford et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8111619 | Liu et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8204717 | McLaughlin et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8244384 | Pachner et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8280057 | Budampati et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8352049 | Hsiung et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8385436 | Holm et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8428067 | Budampati et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8458778 | Budampati et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8571064 | Kore et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8644192 | Budampati et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8811231 | Budampati et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8923882 | Gandhi et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
9134717 | Trnka | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9166667 | Thanikachalam | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9176498 | Baramov | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9751817 | Jani et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9864823 | Horn et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9968899 | Gellaboina et al. | May 2018 | B1 |
10095200 | Horn et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10107295 | Brecheisen | Oct 2018 | B1 |
10180680 | Horn et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10183266 | Victor et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10222787 | Romatier et al. | Mar 2019 | B2 |
10328408 | Victor et al. | Jun 2019 | B2 |
20020123864 | Eryurek et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020179495 | Heyse et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030147351 | Greenlee | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040079392 | Kuechler | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040099572 | Evans | May 2004 | A1 |
20040109788 | Li et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040204775 | Keyes | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040220689 | Mathur et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040220778 | Imai et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050027721 | Saenz | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050098033 | Mallavarapu et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050216209 | Evans | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060020423 | Sharpe, Jr. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060133412 | Callaghan | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060259163 | Hsiung et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070020154 | Evans | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070059159 | Hjerpe | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070059838 | Morrison et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070091824 | Budampati et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070091825 | Budampati et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070185664 | Tanaka | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070192078 | Nasle et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070212790 | Welch et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070250292 | Alagappan et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070271452 | Foo Kune et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080086322 | Wallace | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080130902 | Foo Kune et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080217005 | Stluka et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080282606 | Plaza et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090059786 | Budampati et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090060192 | Budampati et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090064295 | Budampati et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090201899 | Liu et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090245286 | Kore et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090268674 | Liu et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100014599 | Holm et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100108567 | Medoff | May 2010 | A1 |
20100125347 | Martin et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100158764 | Hedrick | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100230324 | Al-Alloush et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100262900 | Romatier et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110112659 | Pachner et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110152590 | Sadler et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110152591 | Sadler et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110311014 | Hottovy et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120029966 | Cheewakriengkrai et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120083933 | Subbu et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120095808 | Kattapuram et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120104295 | Do et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120121376 | Huis in Het Veld | May 2012 | A1 |
20120123583 | Hazen et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120197616 | Trnka | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120259583 | Noboa et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130029587 | Gandhi et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130079899 | Baramov | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130090088 | Chevsky et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130094422 | Thanikachalam | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130253898 | Meagher et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130270157 | Ferrara | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130311437 | Stluka et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140026598 | Trawicki | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140074273 | Mohideen et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140114039 | Benham et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140131027 | Chir | May 2014 | A1 |
20140163275 | Yanagawa et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140174288 | Arslan | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140179968 | Yanagawa et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140212978 | Sharpe, Jr. et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140294683 | Siedler | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140294684 | Siedler | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140296058 | Sechrist et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140309756 | Trygstad | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140337256 | Varadi et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150059714 | Bernards | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150077263 | Ali et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150078970 | Iddir et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150098862 | Lok et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150158789 | Keusenkothen | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150185716 | Wichmann et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150276208 | Maturana et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150330571 | Beuneken | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20160033941 | T et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160098037 | Zornio et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160147204 | Wichmann et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160237910 | Saito | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160260041 | Horn et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160291584 | Horn et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160292188 | Horn et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160292325 | Horn et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20170009932 | Oh | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170058213 | Oprins | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170082320 | Wang | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170284410 | Sharpe, Jr. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170315543 | Horn et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170323038 | Horn et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170352899 | Asai | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180046155 | Horn et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180081344 | Romatier et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180082569 | Horn et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180121581 | Horn et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180122021 | Horn et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180155638 | Al-Ghamdi | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180155642 | Al-Ghamdi et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180197350 | Kim | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180275690 | Lattanzio et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180275691 | Lattanzio et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180275692 | Lattanzio et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180280914 | Victor et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180280917 | Victor et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180282633 | Van de Cotte et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180282634 | Van de Cotte et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180282635 | Van de Cotte et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180283368 | Van de Cotte et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180283392 | Van de Cotte et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180283404 | Van de Cotte et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180283811 | Victor et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180283812 | Victor et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180283813 | Victor et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180283815 | Victor et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180283816 | Victor et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180283818 | Victor et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180284705 | Van de Cotte et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180286141 | Van de Cotte et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180311609 | McCool et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180362862 | Gellaboina et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20180363914 | Faiella et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20180364747 | Charr et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190002318 | Thakkar et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190003978 | Shi et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190015806 | Gellaboina et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190041813 | Horn et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190083920 | Bjorklund et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190101336 | Victor et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190101342 | Victor et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190101907 | Charr et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190108454 | Banerjee et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190120810 | Kumar KN et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190151814 | Victor et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190155259 | Romatier et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2 746 884 | Jun 2014 | EP |
2746884 | Jun 2014 | EP |
2801937 | Nov 2014 | EP |
WO 2001060951 | Aug 2001 | WO |
2009046095 | Apr 2009 | WO |
WO 2009046095 | Apr 2009 | WO |
WO 2014042508 | Mar 2014 | WO |
WO 2014123993 | Aug 2014 | WO |
WO 2016141128 | Sep 2016 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Oct. 25, 2018—(PCT) Notification of Receipt of Search Copy—App PCT/US2018/051532. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2018/051532, dated Mar. 24, 2020. |
WO App. PCT/US2018/051532: International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Dec. 13, 2018. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190083920 A1 | Mar 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62560014 | Sep 2017 | US |