The present disclosure relates to techniques for remote programming of power tools.
Power tools typically include controllers which are used to monitor and control various operating conditions of the tool. Control algorithms and parameters associated therewith are programmed into the controller at the time the power tool is manufactured. It is desirable to provide a simple method for updating the control algorithms and associated parameters after the power tool has been manufactured.
Fastener setting algorithms are one example of a control algorithm that is commonly found in a drill driver. In this example, operating conditions of the tool are monitored as a fastener is driven into a workpiece. When the head of the fastener is flush the surface of the workpiece, the torque applied to the output spindle is interrupted, thereby properly setting the fastener into the workpiece. Because the parameters used by the fastener setting algorithm are pre-programmed into the drill driver, these fixed parameter values are applied to a variety of fastening applications having different types of fasteners and different types of workpieces. Improper setting of the fastener or nuisance trips may occur depending, for example on the characteristics of the fastener or the workpiece. Therefore, it is also desirable to tailor the parameters of the fastener setting algorithm to the particular fastening application.
This section provides background information related to the present disclosure which is not necessarily prior art.
This section provides a general summary of the disclosure, and is not a comprehensive disclosure of its full scope or all of its features.
A method is provided for controlling operation of a power tool, such as a drill driver. The method begins with one or more descriptors for a fastening application being received by a controller residing in the power tool, where the descriptors are indicative of a fastening application to be performed by the power tool and are received via a wireless data link from a computing device located remotely from the power tool. The descriptors are translated into a threshold value used by a fastener setting algorithm and the threshold value is stored in a data store of the power tool. During subsequent fastening operation performed using the tool, an operating parameter of the power tool is monitored and evaluated in accordance with the fastener setting algorithm, including the updated threshold value. Example operating parameters include current delivered to the motor and speed of the motor.
A power tool is also provided. The power tool is comprised generally of: a tool housing; a motor housed in the tool housing and connected to an output spindle to impart rotary motion thereto; a wireless transceiver housed in the tool; and a controller housed in the tool housing and interface with the wireless transceiver. The controller is configured to receive one or more descriptors for a fastening application and modifies a fastener setting algorithm based on the descriptors, where the descriptors are received via a wireless data link from a computing device located remotely from the power tool. During a drill mode, the controller controls operation of the motor according to the modified fastener setting algorithm.
Further areas of applicability will become apparent from the description provided herein. The description and specific examples in this summary are intended for purposes of illustration only and are not intended to limit the scope of the present disclosure.
The drawings described herein are for illustrative purposes only of selected embodiments and not all possible implementations, and are not intended to limit the scope of the present disclosure.
Corresponding reference numerals indicate corresponding parts throughout the several views of the drawings.
Example embodiments will now be described more fully with reference to the accompanying drawings.
A manually depressible and return biased trigger 28 is provided to initiate and control operation of drill driver 10. Trigger 28 is operated by manually depressing in a trigger engagement direction “A” and returns in a trigger release direction “B” upon release. Trigger 28 is provided in a motor housing 30 that according to several aspects is divisible into individual halves, including a motor housing first half 30a and a motor housing second half 30b which can be made for example of molded polymeric material. Positioned adjacent to trigger 28 is a rotary potentiometer/switch assembly 32. A portion 33b of rotary potentiometer/switch assembly 32 extends freely outwardly from body second half 30b on a second or left hand side of body 12. A similar portion 33a extends freely outwardly from body first half 30a on a first or right hand side of body 12. Rotary potentiometer/switch assembly 32 provides several functions which will be described in reference to subsequent figures.
A display 80 is also provided with body 12. In one embodiment, the display is comprised of a six of LEDs arranged horizonally although the number and arrangement of LEDs is not limiting. In other embodiments, the display may be implemented using a LCD. Other types of displays are also contemplated by this disclosure.
Referring to
Rotary potentiometer/switch assembly 32 includes a rotary member 36 in the shape of a circular disk wherein portion 33b extending outward from body 12 is a portion of rotary member 36 extending freely outwardly with respect to body 12 on the left hand side of body 12. The outwardly extending portions 33a, 33b of rotary member 36 allow manual rotation and a side-to-side displacement of rotary member 36 by the user of drill driver 10 from either the right hand side or left hand side of body 12. Rotary member 36 is positioned in a housing space 38 of motor housing 30 providing clearance for both axial rotation of rotary member 36, and side-to-side displacement of rotary member 36 in either a left hand or a right hand displacement such that rotary potentiometer/switch assembly 32 performs at least dual functions such as setting the chuck rotation direction as well as setting the clutch torque value. Further description for the rotary switch assembly can be found in U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2013/0327552 which is incorporated in its entirety by reference herein. According to further aspects, rotary member 36 can be replaced by a sliding member, a rocking member, or other types in input components.
A printed circuit board (PCB) 40 is positioned in handle 14. PCB 40 supports components of an electronic control circuit and may includes a microcontroller 42 having a central processing unit (CPU) or the like for performing multiple functions of drill driver 10, at least one electrically erasable programmable read-only memory (EEPROM) function providing storage of data or selected inputs from the user of drill driver 10, and at least one memory device function for storing both temporarily and permanently saved data such as data lookup tables, torque values and the like for use by drill driver 10. According to other aspects (not shown), microcontroller 42 can be replaced by separate components including a microprocessor, at least one EEPROM, and at least one memory device, or implemented by comparable analog circuitry.
A schematic of an example control circuit for the drill driver 10 is provided in
In one aspect of this disclosure, the drill driver 10 is configured to operate in different modes. For example, the drill driver 10 may provide an input component (e.g., rotary member 36) that enables the tool operator to select a clutch setting for an electronic clutch. In one embodiment, the operator selects between a drill mode and a drive mode. In a drill mode, the amount of torque applied to the output spindle is ignored and transmission of torque is not interrupted by the controller 42 during tool operation; whereas, in a drive mode, torque applied to the output spindle is monitored by the controller 42 during tool operation. The controller 42 may in turn interrupt transmission of torque to the output spindle under certain tool conditions. For example, the controller may determine when a fastener being driven by the tool reaches a desired stopping position (e.g. flush with the workpiece) and terminate operation of the tool in response thereto without user intervention. It is readily understood that the selected clutch setting can be implemented by the controller 42 with or without the use of a mechanical clutch. That is, in some embodiments, the drill driver 10 does not include a mechanical clutch.
With reference to
Drill selector switch 46 and drive selector switch 47 may be actuated in different sequences to activate other tool operating modes. For example, the drive selector switch 47 may be pushed and held for a fixed period of time (e.g., 0.15 sec) to activate a high torque drive mode; whereas, pushing the driver selector switch 47 twice in the fixed period of time may activate a low torque drive mode. To indicate the different drive modes, the driver selector switch 47 may be lit steady when in the high torque drive mode and blinking when in the low torque drive mode. These two sequences are merely illustrative and other combinations of sequences are envisioned to activate these or other tool operating modes.
With reference to
With continuing reference to flow diagram 177, when driver selector switch 47 is depressed by the user and drive mode 182 is entered, a check is performed to determine if an auto seating flag 196 is indicated. If the auto seating flag 196 is not present, the following step determines if a timed operating system flag 198 is present. If the timed operating system flag 198 is present, in a next duty cycle setting step 200 a timed operating duty cycle is set. Following step 200, motor 34 is turned on for a predetermined time period such as 200 ms (milliseconds) in a timed operating step 202. Following timed operating step 202, in a seating/timed operating flag indication step 204, the control system identifies if both an auto seating flag and a timed operating flag are indicated. If both the auto seating flag and timed operating flag indication step 204 are indicated, operation of motor 34 is stopped in a stop motor running step 206.
Returning to timed operating system flag 198, if the flag is not present, a trigger activation second function 208 is performed which initiates operation of motor 34 in a timed turn on motor start 210. Following this and similar to motor over-current check 188, a motor over-current check 212 is performed. If an over-current condition is not indicated, a first routine 214 algorithm is actuated followed by a selection “on” check 216. If the selection “on” check 216 is negative, a second torque routine 218 algorithm is run, following which if a positive indication is present, returns to the seating/timed operating flag indication; and if negative, returns to the return step 194. If the selection “on” check performed at step 216 is positive, a third routine 220 algorithm is run which if positive thereafter returns to seating/timed operating flag indication step 204 and, if negative, returns to return step 194.
In some embodiments, the drive mode may be further divided into an automated drive mode and one or more user-defined drive modes, where each of the user-defined drive modes specify a different value of torque at which to interrupt transmission of torque to the output spindle. In the automated drive mode, the controller monitors the current being delivered to the motor and interrupts torque to the output spindle in response to the rate of change of current measures. Various techniques for monitoring and interrupting torque in an automated manner are known in the art, including algorithms for setting a fastener in a workpiece, and fall within the broader aspects of the disclosure. An improved technique for detecting when a fastener reaches a desired stopping position is further described below. In these embodiments, it is readily understood that the input component may be configured for selection amongst three or more operating modes, such as a drill mode, an automated drive mode and one or more user-defined drive modes.
In a selected one of the user-defined drive modes, the controller sets a value of a maximum current threshold in accordance with the selected one of the user-defined drive modes and interrupts torque to the output spindle in response to the current measures exceeding the maximum current threshold. For example, the user selects one of the user-defined drives modes as the desired clutch setting using, for example rotary member 36. Current levels 154 designated as “a”, “b”, “c”, “d”, “e”, “f” correlate to the plurality of predefined torque levels designated as “1”, “2”, “3”, “4”, “5”, “6”, respectively. During tool operation, the controller 42 will act to terminate rotation of the chuck when the current monitored by the controller 42 exceeds the current level associated with the selected user-defined drive mode (i.e., torque setting). The advantage of providing both types of drive modes (i.e., control techniques) within drill driver 10 includes the use of current level increments 154 which, based on prior operator experience, may indicate an acceptable predetermined torque setting for operation of chuck 20 in a specific material. Where the user may not be familiar with the amount of fastener headset in a particular material and/or with respect to a particular sized fastener, the automatic fastener setting algorithm can be selected, thereby providing for acceptable setting of the fastener for applications unfamiliar to the tool operator.
Current measures may be digitally filtered before computing the current change rate. In an example embodiment, current is sampled in 15 milliseconds intervals. During each interval, the controller will acquire ten current measures as indicated at 560 and compute an average from the ten measures although more or less measures may be acquired during each interval. The average for a given interval may be considered one current sample and stored in an array of current samples indicated at 562 in
With continued reference to
where n is the number of data points. The intercept will be ignored in this disclosure. For illustration purposes, assume data scatter plot with current values for y of [506,670,700,820,890] corresponding to sample values of [1, 2, 3, 4, 5], such that n=5. Using linear regression, the slope b of the best fit line is equal to 91.8. While a simple linear regression technique has been explained, other linear regression techniques are also contemplated by this disclosure.
Slope of the current measures may be used as the primary indicator for when the fastener has been set at a proper depth in the workpiece. Particularly, by using the slope of the current, the tool is able to determine when the tool is in the HROC (of current) area shown in the graph of
The slope counter is adjusted in accordance with the comparison of the current slope to the minimum slope threshold. The slope counter is incremented by one when the computed slope exceeds the minimum slope threshold as indicated at 536. Conversely, the slope counter is decremented by one when the computed slope is less than or equals the minimum slope threshold as indicated at 532. When the slope is less than or equal to the minimum slope threshold, the value of the current slope is also set to zero as indicated at 528. In the event the slope counter is equal to zero, the slope counter is not decremented further and the slope counter remains at zero as indicated at 534. Following each adjustment, the value of the slope counter is stored in an array of slope counts as indicated at 566 in
Next, the slope counts are evaluated at 546 in relation to a fastener criteria. The fastener criteria at step 546 includes both a setting criteria, which is indicative of a desired stopping position for the fastener being driven by the tool, and a default criteria. The setting criteria and default criteria may be used together, as shown in 546 of
As noted above, the setting criteria may not use the entire array of values. For example, the array may be designed to hold five slope count values, but the setting criteria may be set such that an increase of counts over a series of four values (e.g. SC2<SC3<SC4<SC5) is sufficient. Other variations regarding the particular number of counts required are also contemplated.
The fastening criteria evaluated at step 546 may also include a default criteria. In some instances, the setting criteria described above with respect to
As with the setting criteria, the series of values may be less than or equal to the number of values stored in the entire array. In this example, slope count values in the array are again compared to each other. The default criteria is met when the slope count values in the array increase from the oldest value to an intermediate peak value and then decrease from the intermediate peak value to the most recent value. For example, the default criteria may be met if SC1<SC2<SC3>SC4>SC5. Of course, other particular default criteria may be used. For example, the default criteria may require more successive increases or more successive declines than that provided in the example above (e.g., SC1<SC2<SC3<SC4>SC5>SC6>SC7; or SC1<SC2>SC3>SC4; etc.). In this embodiment shown in
Torque transmitted to the output spindle is interrupted at 548 when the slope counts meet the setting criteria or default criteria; otherwise, tool operation continues as indicated at 550. Torque may be interrupted in one or more different ways including but not limited to interrupting power to the motor, reducing power to the motor, actively braking the motor or actuating a mechanical clutch interposed between the motor and the output spindle. In one example embodiment, the torque is interrupted by braking the motor, thereby setting the fastener at the desired position. To simulate the electronic clutching function, the user may be subsequently provided with haptic feedback. By driving the motor back and forth quickly between clockwise and counter-clockwise, the motor can be used to generate a vibration of the housing which is perceptible to the tool operator. The magnitude of a vibration is dictated by a ratio of on time to off time; whereas, the frequency of a vibration is dictated by the time span between vibrations. The duty cycle of the signal delivered to the motor is set (e.g., 10%) so that the signal does not cause the chuck to rotate. Operation of the tool is terminated after providing haptic feedback for a short period of time. It is to be understood that only the relevant steps of the technique are discussed in relation to
In this technique, motor speed is used as a secondary check on whether to interrupt transmission of torque to the output spindle but only when the current slope exceeds a minimum slope threshold. Accordingly, the current slope is compared at 586 to a minimum slope threshold (e.g., with a value of 40). The secondary check proceeds at 588 when the current slope exceeds the minimum slope threshold; otherwise, processing continues with subsequent current sample as indicated at 582.
To perform the secondary check, motor speed is captured at 588. In one example embodiment, motor speed may be captured by a Hall effect sensor disposed adjacent to or integrated with the electric motor. Output from the sensor is provided to the controller. Other types of speed sensors are also contemplated by this disclosure.
In the example embodiment, the controller maintains a variable or flag (i.e., Ref_RPM_Capture) to track when the current slope exceeds the minimum slope threshold. The flag is initially set to false and thereafter remains false while the present slope is less than the minimum slope threshold. At the first occurrence of the current slope exceeding the minimum slope threshold, the flag is false and the controller will set a reference motor speed equal to the present motor speed at 592. The reference motor speed is used to evaluate the magnitude of decrease in motor speed. In addition, the flag is set to true at 593 and will remain set to true until the current slope is less than the minimum slope threshold. For subsequent and consecutive occurrences of the current slope exceeding the minimum slope threshold, the flag remains set to true and reference speed is not reset. In this way, the flag (when set to true) indicates that preceding slope values have exceeded the minimum slope threshold.
Next, the present speed is compared at 594 to the reference speed. When the motor is slowing down (i.e., the reference speed exceeds the present speed), a further determination is made as to the size of the decrease. More specifically, a difference is computed at 595 between the reference speed and the present motor speed. A difference threshold is also set at 596 to be a predefined percentage (e.g., 5%) of the reference speed. The predefined percentage can be derived empirically and may vary for different tool types. The difference is then compared at 597 to the difference threshold. Processing of subsequent current sample continues until the difference between the reference speed and the present speed exceeds the difference threshold as indicated at 597. Once the difference between the reference speed and the present speed exceeds the difference threshold (and while the motor speed is decreasing), transmission of torque to the output spindle is interrupted at 598. It is to be understood that only the relevant steps of the technique are discussed in relation to
Fastener setting algorithms such as the ones described above typically employ threshold values having fixed values. Depending on the fastening application, these fixed parameter values may lead to improper setting of the fastener in the workpiece.
In another aspect of this disclosure, a technique is provided for remotely programming operating parameters of the drill driver 10 through the use of a secondary computing device 602 as shown in
The secondary computing device 602 provides an intuitive and readily accessible means for the tool operator to tailor the operating parameters of the drill driver 10. In an example embodiment, the secondary computing device 602 is configured with a software application that enables the tool operator to input descriptors for a particular task that is being undertaken with the use of the drill driver 10 and subsequently download the descriptors to the drill driver 10.
Descriptors for the fastening application are subsequently transferred from the secondary computing device 602 to the drill driver 10. For example, assuming the drill driver 10 and secondary computing device 602 have been properly paired, the descriptors for the fastening application may be transferred immediately upon receipt from the tool operator via a wireless data link to the drill driver 10. The transfer process may occur with or without further intervention or input from the tool operator. In some instances, the transfer process is not initiated until the secondary computing device 602 is brought into close proximity of the drill driver 10. In other instances, the descriptors for the fastening application may be captured and stored by the secondary computing device 602 for a period of time and then transferred to the drill driver at some later time which may be scheduled or otherwise initiated by the tool operator.
In this embodiment, the values in the look-up table are offsets to a baseline value although the threshold values themselves could also be stored in the look-up table. In the case of #8 wood screw being driven into a piece of pine, an offset value of zero is retrieved from the look-up table and thus no adjustment is needed to the baseline value of the minimum slope threshold. In the case of #6 wood screw being driven into a piece of pine, an offset value of −31 is retrieved from the look-up table and used to lower the baseline value of the minimum slope threshold, for example from 68 to 37. In the case of a 6 GA drywall screw being driven into a piece of pressure treated wood, an offset value of +12 is retrieved from the look-up table and used to increase the baseline value of the minimum slope threshold, for example from 68 to 80. From these examples, it can be seen how the minimum slope threshold can be tailored using descriptors of the fastening application. It is envisioned that other parameters of the fastener setting algorithm, such as the number of increasing slope counts defining the setting criteria, can also be tailored either independently or in combination with the minimum slope threshold in a similar manner using the descriptors for the fastening application. Methods for translating the descriptors to parameter values for the fastener setting algorithm other than using a look-up table also fall within the broader aspects of this disclosure.
Descriptors for the fastening application can also be used to tailor other operating parameters of the drill driver. For example, it may be advantageous to increase the sampling rate of the current being delivered to the motor to ensure a more precise or timely determination of the current slope. With continued reference to the look-up table above, an offset of −3 ms is retrieved from the look-up table for a 6 GA drywall screw being driven into a piece of pressure treated wood. In addition to the minimum slope threshold, the baseline sample rate can be decreased, for example from a baseline value of 15 ms to 12 ms. In another example, it may also be advantageous to increase the motor speed in order to increase work efficiency in certain applications. For drill drivers having two operating modes, such as a drill mode and a drive mode as described above, the motor speed may be limited to a percentage (e.g., 60%) of the maximum speed. In the case of a 6 GA drywall screw being driven into a piece of pressure treated wood, an offset value of +20% for power efficiency is also retrieved from the look-up table and used to increase the maximum motor speed, for example from 60% to 80%. Adjustments to other types of tool operating parameters are also contemplated within the broader aspects of this disclosure.
With continued reference to
Given the automated configuration of drill driver, it is advisable that the tool operator be made aware of the configuration. In this embodiment, an indicia of the configuration is presented at 704 on a display of the drill driver 12, where the indicia is presented in response to the drill driver receiving the descriptors from the secondary computing device. The indicia may be an icon or a message indicating that use of a customized fastener setting algorithm. Alternatively or additionally, the indicia may specify the descriptors for the fastening application and/or current clutch setting for the electronic clutch.
In an alternative embodiment, the tool operator may be prompted before the tool is re-configured as indicated at 702 of
Once the drill driver has been configured, the tool operator can proceed with the fastening application. During the fastening operation, an operating parameter of the tool, such as current, is monitored and evaluated in relation to the re-configured parameters of the fastener setting algorithm. In some embodiments, the re-configured parameters may be used during a single operation before being reverted to the baseline values. In other embodiments, the re-configured parameters may be used in subsequent operations until some triggering event occurs. For example, the tool operator may reset the parameter values to baseline values by depressing the drill button 46 and the drive button 47 simultaneously for a predefined period of time (e.g., one second). In another example, the parameters may be reset to baseline values after a predefined period of time (e.g., 5 minutes or 30 minutes). In any case, the tool operator is also provided with a visual indication (e.g., blinking LEDs) that the parameters have been reset. Other types of triggering events for resetting the parameters values and visual cues are contemplated by this disclosure.
Additionally, the drill driver 10 may be further configured such that the tool operator can override or manually set a parameter of the fastener setting algorithm or another operating parameter of the drill driver.
The techniques described herein may be implemented by one or more computer programs executed by one or more processors residing in a power tool. The computer programs include processor-executable instructions that are stored on a non-transitory tangible computer readable medium. The computer programs may also include stored data. Non-limiting examples of the non-transitory tangible computer readable medium are nonvolatile memory, magnetic storage, and optical storage.
Some portions of the above description present the techniques described herein in terms of algorithms and symbolic representations of operations on information. These algorithmic descriptions and representations are the means used by those skilled in the data processing arts to most effectively convey the substance of their work to others skilled in the art. These operations, while described functionally or logically, are understood to be implemented by computer programs. Furthermore, it has also proven convenient at times to refer to these arrangements of operations as modules or by functional names, without loss of generality. It is understood that grouping of operations within in a given module is not limiting and operations may be shared amongst multiple modules or combined into a single module.
Unless specifically stated otherwise as apparent from the above discussion, it is appreciated that throughout the description, discussions utilizing terms such as “processing” or “computing” or “calculating” or “determining” or “displaying” or the like, refer to the action and processes of a computer system, or similar electronic computing device, that manipulates and transforms data represented as physical (electronic) quantities within the computer system memories or registers or other such information storage, transmission or display devices.
Certain aspects of the described techniques include process steps and instructions described herein in the form of an algorithm. It should be noted that the described process steps and instructions could be embodied in software, firmware or hardware, and when embodied in software, could be downloaded to reside on and be operated from different platforms used by real time network operating systems.
The foregoing description of the embodiments has been provided for purposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the disclosure. Individual elements or features of a particular embodiment are generally not limited to that particular embodiment, but, where applicable, are interchangeable and can be used in a selected embodiment, even if not specifically shown or described. The same may also be varied in many ways. Such variations are not to be regarded as a departure from the disclosure, and all such modifications are intended to be included within the scope of the disclosure.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/445,735 filed Jul. 29, 2014, which claims the benefit of continuation-in-part of International Application No. PCT/US13/23798, filed Jan. 30, 2013, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/592,127 filed on Jan. 30, 2012. This application also claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/898,152 filed on Oct. 31, 2013. The entire disclosure of each of the above applications is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3845373 | Totsu et al. | Oct 1974 | A |
4013895 | Akiyoshi et al. | Mar 1977 | A |
4056762 | Schadlich | Nov 1977 | A |
4104778 | Vliet | Aug 1978 | A |
4200829 | Pohl | Apr 1980 | A |
4249117 | Leukhardt et al. | Feb 1981 | A |
4265320 | Tanaka et al. | May 1981 | A |
4267914 | Saar | May 1981 | A |
4307325 | Saar | Dec 1981 | A |
4317176 | Saar et al. | Feb 1982 | A |
4386305 | Kohzai et al. | May 1983 | A |
4416765 | Mori et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
4426588 | Weilenmann | Jan 1984 | A |
4463293 | Hornung et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
4487270 | Huber | Dec 1984 | A |
4503370 | Cuneo | Mar 1985 | A |
4628459 | Shinohara et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4636961 | Bauer | Jan 1987 | A |
4671364 | Fink et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4673318 | Hornung et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4689534 | Gerber et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4705038 | Sjostrom et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4823057 | Eley | Apr 1989 | A |
4831364 | Shinohara et al. | May 1989 | A |
4858312 | Van Naarden | Aug 1989 | A |
4961035 | Inaba et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4995145 | Eshghy | Feb 1991 | A |
5014793 | Germanton et al. | May 1991 | A |
5038084 | Wing | Aug 1991 | A |
5061885 | Fukuhara | Oct 1991 | A |
5062491 | Takeshima et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5105130 | Barker et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5131130 | Eshghy | Jul 1992 | A |
5154242 | Soshin et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5277261 | Sakoh | Jan 1994 | A |
5293156 | Shoji et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5294874 | Hessenberger et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5353882 | Inoue et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5361852 | Inoue et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5401124 | Hettich | Mar 1995 | A |
5407721 | Fujigaki et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5410229 | Sebastian et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5440215 | Gilmore | Aug 1995 | A |
5449992 | Geiger et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5456955 | Muggli | Oct 1995 | A |
5471023 | Kaizu et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5519604 | Hansson | May 1996 | A |
5563482 | Shaw | Oct 1996 | A |
5563842 | Challa | Oct 1996 | A |
5607048 | Kaizu et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5631823 | Layer et al. | May 1997 | A |
5666463 | Schwartz et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5704435 | Meyer et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5738177 | Schell et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5754019 | Walz | May 1998 | A |
5890405 | Becker | Apr 1999 | A |
5893685 | Olson et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5916450 | Muggli et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5996707 | Thome et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6037729 | Woods et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
D431766 | Zurwelle | Oct 2000 | S |
6167606 | Mueller et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6180048 | Katori | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6311787 | Berry et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6318189 | Donaldson | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6371218 | Amano et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6380207 | Coghlan et al. | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6415875 | Meixner et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6424799 | Gilmore | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6430463 | Lysaght | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6454422 | Williams | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6479958 | Thompson et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6516896 | Bookshar et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6517295 | Lin | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6536536 | Gass | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6598684 | Watanabe | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6616446 | Schmid | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6655471 | Cripe | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6687567 | Watanabe | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6700341 | Schaer et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6741803 | Osselmann et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6750622 | Simizu et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6785591 | Hansson | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6834730 | Gass et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6843327 | Meixner et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6913087 | Brotto | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6923268 | Totsu | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6943510 | Gorti | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6945337 | Kawai et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6968759 | Becker et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6968908 | Tokunaga et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6978846 | Kawai et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6981311 | Seith et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6997083 | Olszewski | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7003887 | Wadge | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7055620 | Nailig et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7062979 | Day et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7071433 | Holscher | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7071645 | Hahn et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7086483 | Arimura et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7091683 | Smith et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7093668 | Gass et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7121358 | Gass et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7155986 | Kawai et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7157882 | Johnson et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7157883 | Johnson et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7164257 | Johnson et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7224548 | Emo | May 2007 | B1 |
7234536 | Scholl et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7253940 | Fitzmaurice et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7306046 | Meixner et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7314097 | Jenner et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7328752 | Gass et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7331406 | Wottreng, Jr. et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7334648 | Arimura | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7342381 | Johnson et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7350595 | Sato et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7369916 | Etter et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7400106 | DeCicco et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7410006 | Zhang et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7419013 | Sainomoto et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7422582 | Malackowski et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7428934 | Arimura | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7467700 | Grease et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7476144 | Dineen et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7492124 | Johnson et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7504791 | Sieber et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7504804 | Johnson et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7506694 | Stirm et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7521892 | Funabashi et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7530294 | Myburgh | May 2009 | B2 |
7540334 | Gass et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7551411 | Woods et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7552781 | Zhang et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7556103 | Matsunaga | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7589500 | Johnson et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7591195 | Puzio | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7594548 | Puzio et al. | Sep 2009 | B1 |
7602137 | Du et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7656131 | Embrey et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7667437 | Johnson et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7673701 | Tanaka et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7677844 | Schell et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7681659 | Zhang et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7690658 | Puzio et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7703330 | Miyazaki et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7708085 | DeCicco et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7726412 | Matsunaga | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7730964 | Simm et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7770658 | Ito et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7784663 | Shelton, IV | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7791318 | Johnson et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7795829 | Seiler et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7802505 | Hetcher et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7818224 | Boerner | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7882899 | Borinato et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7882900 | Borinato et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7942211 | Scrimshaw et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7944181 | Johnson et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
8020727 | Herman et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8025106 | Schmidt | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8056695 | Silbernagel | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8074731 | Iwata et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8234036 | Shin | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8302701 | Morimura | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8360166 | Iimura et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8674640 | Suda et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8919145 | Phillips et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8919466 | Ng et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
20020033267 | Schweizer et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020100347 | Daubinger et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030081338 | Wang et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20040267297 | Malackowski | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050011655 | Crowell | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050247459 | Voigt et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050263305 | Shimizu et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060234617 | Francis et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060237205 | Sia et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070029958 | Clermonts | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070046110 | Liu | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070084613 | Zhang et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070138724 | Gibbons et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070210733 | Du et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070227310 | Roehm et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070229008 | Roehm et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070229027 | Roehm et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070250098 | Malackowski et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080021590 | Vanko et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080135272 | Wallgren | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080289839 | Hricko et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080311795 | Brotto et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080314157 | Cioto et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090098971 | Ho et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090223071 | Alberti et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090229842 | Gray et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090266042 | Mooney et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090308628 | Totsu | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100043562 | Roth et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100065293 | Lohr | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100089600 | Borinato et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100101381 | Gareis | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100147545 | Hirt et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100275564 | Baetica et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100304913 | Su | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100307782 | Iwata et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110000688 | Iwata | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110005787 | Friberg et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110011915 | Shelton, IV | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110013610 | Hall et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110024477 | Hall | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110024478 | Shelton, IV | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110024479 | Swensgard et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110030981 | Totsu | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110034283 | Tsai et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110120738 | Miwa et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110127941 | Hirabayashi et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110138954 | Tokunaga et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110144932 | Alles | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110162861 | Borinato et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110167651 | Tokunaga et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110169481 | Nguyen et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110020382 | Puzio et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110215767 | Johnson et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110245833 | Anderson | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110288573 | Yates et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110303427 | Tang | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110304287 | Yang et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110307201 | Yang et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120199372 | Nishikawa et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120279736 | Tanimoto et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120318550 | Tanimoto et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130014967 | Ito et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130034395 | Erestam et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130049643 | Kusakawa | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130062088 | Mashiko et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130068491 | Kusakawa et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130082632 | Kusakawa | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130133911 | Ishikawa et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130141217 | Goren et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130153252 | Sakakibara | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130269961 | Lim et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130327552 | Loveless et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140367134 | Phillips et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1002341 | Dec 1976 | CA |
1105614 | Jul 1995 | CN |
1815015 | Jul 1970 | DE |
3222065 | Dec 1983 | DE |
3634895 | Apr 1988 | DE |
3634895 | Apr 1988 | DE |
3634896 | Apr 1988 | DE |
202007010762 | Oct 2007 | DE |
102008033866 | Jan 2010 | DE |
102010029729 | Dec 2011 | DE |
0264698 | Apr 1988 | EP |
0264698 | Apr 1988 | EP |
1837129 | Sep 2007 | EP |
2072192 | Jun 2009 | EP |
2090399 | Aug 2009 | EP |
2380704 | Oct 2011 | EP |
2574425 | Apr 2013 | EP |
2115940 | Sep 1983 | GB |
2115940 | Sep 1983 | GB |
2328630 | Mar 1999 | GB |
2328630 | Mar 1999 | GB |
2404891 | Feb 2005 | GB |
2405822 | Mar 2005 | GB |
2426225 | Nov 2006 | GB |
2432809 | Jun 2007 | GB |
1994028947 | Apr 1994 | JP |
H10234130 | Sep 1998 | JP |
H11138459 | May 1999 | JP |
2003-181139 | Jul 2003 | JP |
2004-066413 | Mar 2004 | JP |
2004343963 | Dec 2004 | JP |
2005-118910 | May 2005 | JP |
2005231032 | Sep 2005 | JP |
2005238418 | Sep 2005 | JP |
2006-026850 | Feb 2006 | JP |
2011177796 | Sep 2011 | JP |
2012011502 | Jan 2012 | JP |
WO-200207920 | Jan 2002 | WO |
WO2008101408 | Feb 2008 | WO |
WO2008049682 | May 2008 | WO |
WO-2009047629 | Apr 2009 | WO |
WO-10110225 | Sep 2010 | WO |
WO2013116303 | Aug 2013 | WO |
WO-2013-116303 | Aug 2013 | WO |
WO2013116303 | Aug 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Black + Decker 20v Max Lithium Drill/Driver Instructional Manual—Catalog No. BDCDE120. |
Picture of Black + Decker 20v Max Lithium Drill/Driver with AutoSense Technology http://www.blackanddecker.com/products/power-tools/portable-power-tools/20v-max-power-tools/20v-max-lithium-drilldriver-with-autosense-technology/bdcde120c. |
YouTube video of How to Use Our 20v Max AutoSense Drill (Website printout and product description attached) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LPgG7jfN0BQ , published Apr. 28, 2014. |
1st Office Action dated Sep. 18, 2015, in Chinese Patent Application No. 201310227248.7. |
EP Search Report dated Sep. 26, 2017, for EP Application No. EP13171059. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180154456 A1 | Jun 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61898152 | Oct 2013 | US | |
61592127 | Jan 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14445735 | Jul 2014 | US |
Child | 15875203 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | PCT/US2013/023798 | Jan 2013 | US |
Child | 14445735 | US |