The invention relates to a method and apparatus for sending and receiving prompts to end-users, and in particular, to end-users located in a home.
Currently, many elder adults rely on a variety of low-tech methods to remember important events such as handwritten messages posted throughout the home. Concerned family members must visit/phone frequently to gather this type of information which is problematic for the elder adult (they don't want to be a burden on their family members) as well as the family caregiver (feelings of guilt for not calling/visiting often enough).
Personal health has been targeted as one of the major growth areas for the foreseeable future. Elder care is likely to be one of the primary (future) use cases in this area. A remote prompting infrastructure interoperable with a wide variety of devices that can inform elder adults and remote caregivers of critical/non-critical health events is going to be a key building block that will enable elder care related solutions in the home.
Currently there is no advertising tied into the prompting systems out there. By associating a relevant ad with a specific prompt to each individual user, the effectiveness of the ads is increased. Also, since the ad is tied to a prompt that the user needs to see, then the ad will be seen too.
There are ads that are associated with gross classifications like television audience, and there are targeted ads that are associated with finer classifications like web-browsing choices, but neither of these are delivered in conjunction with a prompt that the user needs to comprehend and respond to, nor do they guarantee that the user will see them.
The embodiment of the invention relates to a system for sending prompts to a user in a network including at least one remote prompting client to receive a prompt and notify the user of an event and a remote prompting host to scan the network to detect the at least one remote prompting client, wherein the remote prompting host identifies an event of the user and sends the prompt to the detected at least one remote prompting client. Preferably, the remote prompting host is hardware and/or software running on a computer which interfaces with sensors located throughout the network to determine the event of the user. Preferably, the remote prompting client is a module on the user's network associated with at least one of a network display device, television, phone, cell phone, picture frame display, and mirror. According to a further embodiment, the prompt is at least one of a message, image and sound. Preferably, an advertisement is paired with the prompt and/or the advertisement is loaded to the remote prompting host. According to yet another embodiment, the remote prompting host determines when the advertisement is paired and sent with the prompt based on the event, sends the advertisement with the prompt, and notifies a central server responsible for the advertisement that the advertisement was sent and displayed at the user's network.
According to yet another embodiment, a method is provided for receiving a prompt at a remote prompting client and notifying the user of an event and scanning the network at a remote prompting host to detect the at least one remote prompting client, wherein the remote prompting host identifies an event of the user and sends the prompt to the detected at least one remote prompting client. Preferably, the remote prompting host is hardware and/or software running on a computer which interfaces with sensors located throughout the network to determine the event of the user. Preferably, the remote prompting client is a module on the user's network associated with at least one of a television, phone, cell phone, picture frame display, and mirror. According to a further embodiment, the prompt is at least one of a message, image and sound and/or an advertisement is paired with the prompt. In another embodiment, the advertisement may be loaded to the remote prompting host.
According to this embodiment, the remote prompting host determines when the advertisement is paired and sent with the prompt based on the event, sends the advertisement with the prompt, and notifies a central server responsible for the advertisement that the advertisement was sent and displayed at the user's network.
According to a further embodiment, a system is provided for monitoring a user in a network, the system including a sensor/actuator network to determine when an event occurs in the system, a computing device to monitor and prompt the system when an event occurs, the computing device including an inference engine and a decision manager, a prompting device to receive prompts from the computing device and for displaying the prompt to the user, and a gateway or transducer access point to bridge the sensor/actuator network with the computing device.
Preferably, when the sensor/actuator network determines that an event has occurred, sending a response to the computing device. According to this embodiment, when the computing device receives the response, the inference engine analyzes the response and the decision manager initiates actuation of the associated prompting device. Preferably, the inference engine collects and interprets the response in order to analyze data sent from the sensor/actuator, and the decision manager initiates actuation of the associated prompting device based on rules defined by the system.
UPnP is an architecture for pervasive peer-to-peer network connectivity of intelligent appliances, wireless devices, and PCs. It is designed to bring easy-to-use, flexible, standards-based connectivity to ad-hoc or unmanaged networks whether in the home, in a small business, public spaces, or attached to the Internet. UPnP is a distributed, open networking architecture that leverages TCP/IP and the Web technologies to enable seamless proximity networking in addition to control and data transfer among networked devices in the home, office, and public spaces.
UPnP is more than just a simple extension of the plug and play peripheral model. It is designed to support zero-configuration, “invisible” networking, and automatic discovery for a breadth of device categories from a wide range of vendors. This means a device can dynamically join a network, obtain an IP address, convey its capabilities, and learn about the presence and capabilities of other devices.
Protocols supported by the TAP include, for example, Bluetooth and Z-Wave. Obviously, any protocol may be used as would be appreciated by the skilled artisan. The protocols tend to be flexible, extensible building blocks that allows radio protocols such as these to communicate with other devices inside and outside the home.
The following sensors and actuators are examples of devices that may be integrated into the platform: Scales, Blood Pressure Monitors, Pressure Sensors, Presence Sensors, Multi-Level Light, Television, Personal Computers, Bathroom Mirror Displays, Picture Frame Displays, Cell Phones, PDAs, etc. Again, this list of devices is exemplary and not exclusive. Due to limitations exhibited by typical wireless sensors (e.g. power profile, transmission range, memory capacity, cost, etc.) a TAP is used to allow communication to take place, as described above.
An Inference Engine is the computational entity responsible for computing and understanding the data collected from the home sensor network. Essentially, sensor data is collected, and compared against a probabilistic model in order to determine the events that the data represents. Based on the recognized events, the decision manager may initiate local and/or remote actuation. For example; the probabilistic model may determine, based on data collected from multiple sensors (e.g., bed pressure sensor, motion sensors, bedroom door contact switch, etc.) that the occupant is in bed.
In
A Decision Manager, illustrated in
The information retrieved from Inferred Services in conjunction with user-defined rules will be used within the framework of the platform to construct a state machine representing the activities taking place in the home. The following is an example of the Decision Manager in action:
1. Remote family caregiver accesses rule editor via web interface;
2. RFC creates a rule that specifies the following: If primary occupant is in the bathroom for over 2 hours, send SMS message to my cell phone;
3. Occupant enters bathroom (detected by motion sensor and/or weight scale measurement); and
4. 2 hours elapse (an unusually long time for the home occupant to remain in the bathroom), state machine raises alert to Rule Execution Engine, and SMS message is sent via actuator interface alerting the remote caregiver of a possible fall.
For the purposes of this example, the following types of actuation will be supported by the Decision Manager's Actuator Interface:
It is readily understood that the above-mentioned types of actuation is not limiting, but rather exemplary.
There exist many reminder or prompting systems on computers or entertainment systems. Some examples are calendar applications that remind you to go to a meeting or appointment, or a digital video recorder that prompts you to change the channel to a show that's on.
Future prompting systems may be more intelligent and display prompts for users on one of many displays in the house based on the nature of the prompt or the location of the person. Such a system would have knowledge of the nature of the prompt (medical, entertainment, etc) and the location of the person in their home.
This invention, in another exemplary embodiment, may also use the remote prompting infrastructure to deliver a targeted ad to an individual that is guaranteed to be seen because it is tied in with the prompt. The ad and prompt can be shown continuously until the prompt is acknowledged. Also, since the remote prompting infrastructure will have some knowledge of the user, advertisers can filter the type of individual they'd like to target by age, hobbies, or location.
Some Examples:
Remote Prompting Client:
This is a software and/or hardware module that is running on the end-user's home network and are typically associated with a physical display device (e.g. television, cell phone, picture frame display, bathroom mirror with integrated TV, etc.). This entity has the ability to receive a prompt request from a Remote Prompting Host, and display (either visually, audibly or by touch) the prompt to the end-user.
Remote Prompting Host:
This is a software and/or hardware module that is running on the end-user's home network and has the ability to scan the network and discover all existing Remote Prompting Clients. The Remote Prompting Host performs two critical functions:
Example:
The remote prompting is part of a larger platform (i.e. architecture) that is responsible for, in addition to the remote prompting, all other aspects associated therewith.
This invention also increases the attractiveness of remote prompting infrastructures to service providers by creating another revenue stream.
It is readily understood by the skilled artisan that the embodiments disclosed herein are merely exemplary and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3925763 | Wadhwani et al. | Dec 1975 | A |
5898831 | Hall et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
6088659 | Kelley et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6121593 | Mansbery et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6867697 | Nanayakkara et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6906635 | Moutaux et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
7006881 | Hoffberg et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7043532 | Humpleman et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7119689 | Mallett et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7181438 | Szabo | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7242988 | Hoffberg et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7244231 | Dewing et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7305350 | Bruecken | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7420474 | Elks et al. | Sep 2008 | B1 |
7562304 | Dixon et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7650425 | Davis et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7653394 | McMillin | Jan 2010 | B2 |
8225194 | Rechsteiner et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8464278 | Nesamoney et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8725567 | Huang et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
20020150147 | Liang | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030014283 | Iwano et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030037072 | Bowman et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030109938 | Daum et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030163372 | Kolsy | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030184441 | Nanayakkara et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040015385 | Kumakawa | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040057340 | Charles-Erickson et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040064351 | Mikurak | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20050021779 | Ahamed et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050065813 | Mishelevich et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050138137 | Encarnacion et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050138179 | Encarnacion et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050138192 | Encarnacion et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050138193 | Encarnacion et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050197865 | Jordan | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050222933 | Wesby | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060010199 | Brailean et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060020366 | Bloom | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060034156 | Chen | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060036619 | Fuerst et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060111933 | Wheeler | May 2006 | A1 |
20060122864 | Gottesman et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060125620 | Smith et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060135156 | Malu et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060136142 | Berlin et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060136259 | Weiner et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060179313 | Wang | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060200253 | Hoffberg et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070118399 | Avinash et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070169194 | Church et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070197261 | Humbel | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070293952 | Callaghan et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080008125 | Pham et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080082404 | Welles et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080103608 | Gough et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080262872 | Perry et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090070149 | Kurian et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090077601 | Brailean et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090248182 | Logan et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100268605 | Waelbroeck et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110145731 | Anderson et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20130117395 | Bushmitch et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Microsoft Press, One Microsoft Way, Redmond, Washington 98052-6399; Computer Dictionary Second Edition; ISBN 1-55615-597-2; Casey D. Doyle et al.; Copyright 1994. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080082404 A1 | Apr 2008 | US |