This application is related to U.S. nonprovisional patent application Ser. No. 12/152,127, filed on May 5, 2008, hereby incorporated by reference, entitled “Remote Sensing of Wave Heights Using a Narrowband Radar Arrangement,” by inventor Jerry Rosson Smith Jr.
The following description relates generally to a system and a method for detecting and monitoring a sea state, more particularly, a system and method for calculating an instantaneous water height and generating a surface water profile using a broadband radar arrangement positioned above a targeted surface.
Surface conditions in open water are monitored for various oceanographic and maritime reasons. The ability to monitor surface conditions from remote locations is particularly advantageous. Various methods of measuring surface conditions such as wave heights and the like are currently available. In terms of remote analysis, most methods involve measuring the wind speed remotely or counting transient anomalies, such as sea spike statistics to estimate the sea state. It is desired to have a system that remotely and accurately measures wave heights and open water surface profiles. It is also desired to have a wave height and surface profile detecting system that is operable and provides accurate reading in different environmental conditions.
In one aspect, the invention is a method of remotely monitoring and determining a sea state. The method includes the positioning of a broadband radar arrangement above a targeted water surface. In this aspect, the broadband radar arrangement includes a transmitter and a receiver, wherein the transmitter and the receiver are spatially arranged with respect to each other, at extreme ends of the targeted water surface. The method includes the transmitting of multiple-frequency signals from the transmitter during a predetermined period. The method further includes the receiving of received signals at the receiver, during the predetermined period. In this aspect, the received signals are a combination of signals transmitted directly from the transmitter to the receiver and forward scattered signals reflected off the targeted water surface. The method further includes the mapping of an interference pattern based on received signals, and the determining of an instantaneous surface water height of the targeted water surface based on the interference pattern.
In another aspect, the invention is a system for monitoring and determining a sea state. The system includes a broadband radar arrangement above a targeted water surface in which the broadband radar arrangement includes a transmitter for transmitting multiple-frequency signals. The broadband radar arrangement further includes a receiver for receiving received signals at the receiver. In this aspect, the received signals are a combination of signals transmitted directly from the transmitter to the receiver, as well as forward scattered signals reflected off the targeted water surface. The transmitter and the receiver are spatially arranged with respect to each other at extreme ends of the targeted water surface. The system further includes a computer-readable medium bearing a program code for monitoring and determining a sea state. The program code includes one or more program code segments for receiving the received signals from the radar receiver, for mapping an interference pattern based on received signals, and for determining an instantaneous surface water height of the targeted water surface based on the mapped interference pattern.
Other features will be apparent from the description, the drawings, and the claims.
The radar arrangement (120, 125) is mounted above a targeted water surface 101 for monitoring the surface and determining a sea state of the water surface. The targeted water surface 101 may be part of a large body of water, such as an ocean, river, lake or the like. The radar arrangement may be fixed in a substantially stationary position by bottom mounting. Alternatively, the radar arrangement may be mounted on a floating device. Both the transmitter 120 and the receiver 125 may be vertically adjustable, regardless of the manner in which the radar arrangement is mounted.
As outlined above, in operation the radar transmitter 120 transmits radio signals, which are received by the receiver 125. The radio signals are received via a direct path 122 and also by a forward scattered path 123 off the water surface. As outlined above, the radar arrangement includes a modulating device for spectrally varying frequencies at which the signals are transmitted. In one exemplary embodiment, the radar arrangement (120, 125) may be a synthesized coherent stepped chirp system that operates in a monochromatic mode by emitting a pulse at different frequencies in the monochromatic mode, and measuring the coherent response for each frequency. In this embodiment, the transmitter 120 transmits broadband signals in about 225 to about 275 evenly spaced frequencies in the range of about 8 GHz to about 12 GHz. Intervals may be about 50 ms to about 250 ms. In one embodiment, the distance R may be about 50 m to about 70 m, and the radar transmitter 120 may be positioned at a height HX above the water surface 101 of about 1 m to about 5.5 m above the targeted water surface 101, and the radar receiver 125 may be positioned at height HY above the water surface 101 of about 0.7 m to about 1.8 m. However, the distance R between the transmitter 120 and the receiver 125 may be any desired distance, provided that the direct path 122 is maintained. Thus R may one or more kilometers long, up to about 16 km. When R is about 16 km, the heights (HX, HR) of the transmitter 120 and receiver 125 would be in the order of about 7.5 m to about 30.5 m.
As stated above, the signals received by the receiver 125 are then transmitted to the computer 150. As shown in
Using a geometric optics scattering model for received field, the instantaneous wave height is given by equation (1):
According to equation (1), δ is the instantaneous height relative to a mean water height 105. As illustrated in
κ=2π/λ (2)
In equation (2), λ is the wavelength of the tracked null of the broadband radar waves. As shown in
RDP=√{square root over (R2+(HX−HR)2)} (3)
As stated above, the computer 150 includes a computer-readable medium bearing a program code for monitoring and determining an instantaneous water height and the prevailing sea state. The program code includes one or more code segments for receiving the signals from the radar receiver 125, and for mapping an interference pattern 200, based on the received signals. The code segments also provide for determining an instantaneous water height δ based on the interference pattern 200. Equation (1) is the formula used for the calculation of the instantaneous height δ. In one particular embodiment, the instantaneous height is calculated at one or more nulls 210 in the interference pattern 200. It should be noted that the look down angle 121 is a determining factor in the number of nulls 210 in the interference pattern 200. Higher look down angles 121 tend to produce a greater number of nulls 121 in the interference pattern 200. Consequently, the look down angle 121 should not be so high that a plurality of indistinguishable nulls is produced. Additionally, although nulls may be used for ease of calculation, other points in the interference pattern 200 may also be used to determine an instantaneous height δ. The one or more program code segments also provide for the generation of a surface water spectrum. A plurality of instantaneous height determinations are made in order to properly determine the surface water spectrum.
Step 320 is the transmitting of multiple-frequency signals from the transmitter 120, during a predetermined period. As outlined above, the arrangement includes a frequency modulating device to produce multiple-frequency signals. Step 330 is the receiving of received signals at the receiver 125 during the predetermined period. As outlined above, the received signals are a combination of waves transmitted directly from the transmitter and forward scattered waves reflected from the targeted water surface 101. Step 340 is the mapping of an interference pattern 200 based on received signals. Step 350 is the determining of an instantaneous surface water height δ of the targeted water surface 101 based on the interference pattern. As outlined above, the instantaneous height δ is calculated using the variables of equation (1), and a plurality of instantaneous heights δ may be calculated in order to generate a surface profile.
What has been described and illustrated herein are preferred embodiments of the invention along with some variations. The terms, descriptions and figures used herein are set forth by way of illustration only and are not meant as limitations. Those skilled in the art will recognize that many variations are possible within the spirit and scope of the invention, which is intended to be defined by the following claims and their equivalents, in which all terms are meant in their broadest reasonable sense unless otherwise indicated.
The following description was made in the performance of official duties by employees of the Department of the Navy, and, thus the claimed invention may be manufactured, used, licensed by or for the United States Government for governmental purposes without the payment of any royalties thereon.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2147810 | Alford | Feb 1939 | A |
2256539 | Alford | Sep 1941 | A |
4101891 | Fletcher et al. | Jul 1978 | A |
4481517 | Brown | Nov 1984 | A |
4595925 | Hansen | Jun 1986 | A |
4633255 | Trizna | Dec 1986 | A |
4847623 | Jean et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4988885 | Lindstrom | Jan 1991 | A |
5264852 | Marquet | Nov 1993 | A |
5278564 | Groenenboom | Jan 1994 | A |
5438334 | Anderson | Aug 1995 | A |
5469168 | Anderson | Nov 1995 | A |
5642330 | Santopietro | Jun 1997 | A |
5703594 | Anderson | Dec 1997 | A |
6107957 | Cramer et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6382022 | Martinez et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6795015 | Edvardsson | Sep 2004 | B2 |
7053630 | Westerling et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7138941 | Smith, Jr. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7145502 | Uebo et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7161529 | Smith, Jr. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7218268 | VandenBerg | May 2007 | B2 |
7265710 | DeAgro | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7479921 | Iritani et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7486226 | Edvardsson | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7498974 | Nilsson | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7589664 | Jirskog | Sep 2009 | B2 |