A server or computing system generally includes one or more processors, memory, and peripheral components and peripheral interfaces. Examples of peripheral components include cryptographic accelerators, graphics accelerators, and extensible markup language (XML) accelerators. Examples of peripheral interfaces include network interface cards (NICs), serial ATA (SATA) adapters, serial attached SCSI (SAS) adapters, RAID adapters, and Fibre Channel and iSCSI host bus adapters (HBAs). Processors, memory, and peripherals are often connected using one or more buses and bus bridges. To provide fault-tolerance, individual servers are often configured with redundant resources.
Since resources, such as peripheral components and peripheral interfaces, are assigned on a per server basis, other servers do not typically have access to these resources. In order to provide adequate resources for each server, resources are typically over-provisioned. For example, more hardware acceleration is provided than is typically needed. More network interface capacity is allocated than is typically used simply to handle worst-case or expected worst-case scenarios. Resources are over-provisioned resulting in overall waste and low utilization. Resource assignment on a per server basis also limits the ability to reconstruct or reconfigure a resource environment.
A more efficient and flexible approach is to provide remote peripherals which can be shared among servers while maintaining quality-of-service guarantees and providing the ability to change dynamically the assignment of peripherals to servers. Such shared remote peripherals are referred to as virtualized resources.
Ethernet is a commonly deployed server networking technology and it may be used for communication between servers and their remote peripherals. However, the high reliability, performance, and quality-of-service guarantees needed for communication with remote peripherals are lacking for known Ethernet applications. Consequently, the techniques and mechanisms are needed to provide efficient and reliable data transfer between servers and remote peripherals over Ethernet, along with quality of service and methods to discover and manage the remote peripherals.
The invention may best be understood by reference to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, which are illustrative of specific embodiments of the present invention.
Reference will now be made in detail to some specific examples of the invention including the best modes contemplated for carrying out the invention. Examples of these specific embodiments are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. While the invention is described in conjunction with these specific embodiments, it will be understood that it is not intended to limit the invention to the described embodiments. On the contrary, it is intended to cover alternatives, modifications, and equivalents as may be included within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
For example, the techniques of the present invention will be described in the context of lossy and lossless Ethernet and Fibre Channel Storage Area Networks (SANs). However, it should be noted that the techniques of the present invention can be applied to a variety of different standards and variations of Ethernet and SANs. In the following description, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. The present invention may be practiced without some or all of these specific details. In other instances, well-known operations have not been described in detail in order not to obscure unnecessarily the present invention.
Furthermore, techniques and mechanisms of the present invention will sometimes be described in singular form for clarity. However, it should be noted that some embodiments can include multiple iterations of a technique or multiple instantiations of a mechanism unless noted otherwise. For example, a processor is used in a variety of contexts. However, it will be appreciated that multiple processors can also be used while remaining within the scope of the present invention unless otherwise noted.
A server or computing system generally includes one or more processors, memory, as well as other peripheral components and peripheral interfaces, such as HBAs, hardware accelerators, NICs, graphics accelerators, disks, etc. Applications running on servers can access storage within a SAN using resources such as HBAs, while other networks are accessed using NICs.
Servers using conventional internal dedicated I/O controllers are typically over-provisioned with NICs and HBAs due to many reasons. One reason is a need to provide sufficient capacity for the occasional peak loads incurred by the server. Another reason is the need to connect the server to multiple networks, each requiring its own I/O adapter port. Furthermore, there may be a need to provide dedicated bandwidth to different applications. For example, servers are increasingly virtualized to run multiple operating systems in different virtual machines on the same server at the same time. These reasons may lead to multiple I/O controllers installed on virtualized servers. Over-provisioning resources increases the cost and complexity of servers (e.g., servers with many bus slots to accommodate various adapters), increases the number of edge switch ports to connect to the adapters, and leads to extensive cabling.
Consequently, the techniques and mechanisms described here provide I/O resources such as NICs, HBAs, and other peripheral interfaces in one or more I/O director devices connected to servers over an Ethernet network. Individual servers no longer each require numerous HBAs and NICs, but instead can share HBAs and NICs provided at an I/O director. The individual servers are connected to the I/O director over an Ethernet network, which is used as an I/O fabric. In this configuration, I/O resources can now be shared across the entire server pool rather than being dedicated to individual servers. Quality of service of I/O for individual servers is provided by the I/O director. As a result, fewer I/O resources are required across multiple servers leading to less complex and less expensive systems. Furthermore, such configurations tend to be more flexible and easier to manage since I/O resources can be assigned dynamically without having to change the physical configurations of the servers (e.g., install or remove I/O adapters).
The techniques and mechanisms of the present invention provide virtual HBAs and virtual NICs that a server can access as though physical HBAs and NICs were included in the server and connected to its I/O bus. In certain embodiments, the actual HBAs and NICs are included in a remote shared I/O module within an I/O director connected to the server over an Ethernet network. I/O buses provide reliable ordered delivery with flow control, which is important for communication with some I/O devices. For example, if some of the traffic between the server and an HBA is lost or delivered out-of-order, storage corruption may occur. Similarly, communication between the server and its vNICs and vHBAs provided by the I/O director must have the same properties of reliability, in-order delivery, and flow control. The techniques and mechanisms of various embodiments address this requirement for both standard (lossy) and lossless Ethernet.
Connecting servers to I/O directors using Ethernet allows for widespread adoption of I/O directors with minimal investment and no disruption. For example, Ethernet cards are readily available on numerous existing servers, and existing servers can be connected to I/O directors using these existing Ethernet interface cards. No additional interfaces or interface cards need to be configured or installed on individual servers, so servers can be used as-is without a need to disrupt their activity, open them, and install new cards. Using these existing Ethernet cards, servers can access and share HBAs, NICs and other peripheral interfaces and components included at an I/O director over an Ethernet network.
According to various embodiments, NICs, HBAs and other server I/O resources can be offloaded to the IOD 107. The NICs and HBAs are maintained in a shared and virtualized manner on the IOD 107, which provides links to various external switches. By using the IOD 107, the number of resources and links can be significantly reduced, thus increasing operational efficiencies. Further, the network illustrated in
Lossy Ethernet refers to an Ethernet technology in which data packets may be lost or delivered out of order by the Ethernet fabric. Lossless Ethernet refers to an enhanced Ethernet technology, which is also known as Data Center Ethernet (DCE), Convergence Enhanced Ethernet (CEE), or Data Center Bridging (DCB). Lossless Ethernet provides guaranteed packet delivery without drops. It also provides ordered packet delivery, flow control for eight classes of traffic, and some other enhancements, such as congestion management.
According to various embodiments, the IOD 107 can use lossy and/or lossless Ethernet to manage data transfer between the servers 101-103 and the IOD. While lossless Ethernet may be more particularly suitable, other fabrics may be used. For example, a transport protocol used by the IOD 107 may have capabilities for re-transmission, re-ordering out of order packets, back-off upon packet loss for dealing with the lack of flow control, and other capabilities for addressing problems that may arise when using lossy Ethernet. Certain transport protocols may be used on both lossless and lossy Ethernet and furthermore optimized for each Ethernet type. Overall, the transport protocols and IOD configurations of the present invention can be implemented over a lossy or lossless Ethernet fabric.
A number of different transport protocols can be used for communication between the servers and the remote virtual I/O devices provided by the I/O modules within the IOD 107. One example of such a transport protocol is the Internet Wide Area RDMA Protocol (iWARP) which runs on top of TCP. Another example is the Reliable Connection (RC) protocol which is generally defined by the InfiniBand architecture but can be used over an Ethernet fabric as well. iWARP may be used for lossy Ethernet since it makes use of TCP, which provides back-off upon packet loss as well as retransmissions and handling of out-of-order packets. RC may be used for lossless Ethernet since it does not include the complexity and overhead of congestion control (slow start and back-off), which is not necessary at the transport protocol level for lossless Ethernet.
Multiple IOD devices may exist on the same Ethernet network, and they may be managed individually or from a single central management station. Servers may have virtual I/O devices on a single IOD or on multiple IODs. Also, multiple IODs may be used in redundant pairs for fault-tolerance. The failover itself may be implemented at the I/O module level, the IOD level, or within the virtual I/O device drivers on the server.
According to various embodiments, the IOD 107 can provide flexible termination points for the I/O resources assigned to servers. The IOD 107 may be connected to multiple Ethernet networks 109 and/or Fibre Channel networks 108. Connection of a server to one or more networks is performed by assigning the server's vNICs and/or vHBAs to these networks. Therefore, servers can be connected to different physical networks without a need for re-cabling or any other physical intervention.
Similarly, I/O resources can be moved from one server to another. For example, a vNIC 213 which was originally assigned to one server (e.g., server 101 in
Virtual machines running on the servers may be assigned their own dedicated virtual I/O devices on the IOD 107. Since the I/O modules within the IOD 107 are capable of enforcing quality-of-service guarantees, this provides a way to divide I/O capacity between virtual machines, and make sure that a virtual machine gets no more than a predetermined share of I/O resources, thus preventing one virtual machine from limiting the I/O resources available to other virtual machines.
IODs may be used to offload the network switching from virtual machine hypervisors. Typically, virtual machines communicate over a virtual switch, which is implemented within the hypervisor software on the server. External switching provided at IOD 107 may be used to enhance control or security. In certain embodiments, each virtual machine can be assigned its own dedicated vNIC 213 on IOD 107, and in this case all switching is performed externally.
The internal Ethernet I/O fabric 201 of an IOD may serve a dual purpose. First, it is an Ethernet switch, which provides communication between the servers and the I/O modules, such as vHBA module 205 and vNIC module 203. Second, as a switch, the internal Ethernet I/O fabric can provide direct communication between the servers. This communication may consist of standard TCP or UDP traffic. Furthermore, RC, iWARP, and other similar transport protocols, which are utilized for providing reliable high-performance communication between the servers and the I/O modules, can be used for server-to-server communication. This allows using high-performance communication protocols and libraries, such as Sockets Direct Protocol (SDP), Reliable Datagram Sockets (RDS), and Message Passing Interface (MPI), for server-to-server communication while using the vNIC and vHBA capabilities of the IOD at the same time.
The target channel adapter (TCA) is a device which connects one or more I/O modules (e.g., vHBA module 205, vNIC module 203) of the IOD 107 to the Ethernet I/O fabric, such as Internal Ethernet Fabric 201. In certain embodiments, each I/O module contains a TCA as shown in
In certain embodiments, when a server transmits a data packet to an I/O module, the corresponding TCA removes the link and transport protocol headers (e.g., Ethernet link headers, iWARP/TCP/IP, RC, or other transport headers) from the packet and then forwards the packet with an internal header to the next stage of the I/O module, such as the vNIC network processor or the vHBA virtualization logic, which are further described below in the context of
According to various embodiments, the classifier logic 309 includes header parsing and lookup logic configured to identify information, such as packet destination, priority, and TCP port. The classifier logic 309 can be used to filter incoming data or apply traffic engineering policies. In some instances, the classifier logic 309 can be used to block packets in order to implement a firewall. In certain embodiments, the buffer manager 305 manages data in memory. In the same or other embodiments, the queue manager 307 manages packet queues and performs traffic engineering tasks, such as traffic “policing” (i.e., enforcing committed and peak data rates available for each vNIC), shaping, and prioritizing based on results from classier logic 309 and configuration information. The queue manager 307 may also perform load-balancing operations by distributing incoming traffic across multiple vNICs.
Multiple vNICs may terminate on the same vNIC I/O module Ethernet port. Typically, different vNICs have distinct MAC addresses that are visible on the Ethernet network. As a result, services that rely on MAC addresses, such as Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP), are not disrupted.
The vNIC-to-vNIC switching logic 311 performs packet forwarding between vNICs terminating on the same Ethernet port. It maintains a table of corresponding vNICs and MAC addresses and performs packet forwarding based on MAC addresses using a process similar to the one used in regular Ethernet switches. For example, if vNIC_1 is linked to address MAC_1, and a data packet having MAC_1 as its destination address is received on vNIC_2 which terminates on the same Ethernet port as vNIC 1, then the vNIC-to-vNIC switching logic 311 forwards this packet to vNIC_1. This functionality enables using an IOD with external switches that do not forward packets to the same link that they came from, so the switching is performed in this case within I/O modules themselves.
In certain embodiments, the vNIC I/O module 203 also has learning logic 313, which is used to establish a mapping of vNICs created by virtualization software (on the servers) to vNICs of the IOD 107. When a server is virtualized and one or more virtual machines are created on the server, each virtual machine can be associated with one or more vNICs, which are implemented by the server virtualization software. These vNICs are also referred to as Virtual Machine vNICs or simply VM vNICs. Each VM vNIC has a MAC address, which is assigned by the virtualization software. One or more VM vNICs may be bridged to a single vNIC of the IOD 107 using a software virtual switch, which is implemented by the virtualization software. In these embodiments, the traffic of multiple VM vNICs may appear on the same vNIC of the IOD 107, and this traffic may consist of packets with different source MAC addresses for the different VM vNICs. The vNIC I/O module 203 needs to establish a mapping between a VM vNIC MAC addresses and a corresponding vNIC of the IOD 107. This mapping enables directing incoming traffic to the correct vNIC of the IOD 107. For example, if a packet with destination MAC address MAC_1 arrives at the I/O module Ethernet port, and MAC_1 is the address of VM vNIC_1, then the I/O module needs to know which vNIC of the IOD 107 should receive this packet. In certain embodiments, a lookup is performed in a mapping table to establish this IOD vNIC to VM vNIC correspondence.
The mapping table may be populated by the learning logic 313 as packets arrive from the servers. In certain embodiments, the learning logic examines the source MAC addresses of the packets arriving on the different vNICs of the IOD 107 and populates the mapping table according to the observed source MAC addresses. For example, if a packet with source MAC address MAC_1 arrives on vNIC_5 of the IOD 107, then the learning logic 313 may insert an entry in the mapping table specifying that MAC_1 belongs to vNIC_5. Later, when a packet with destination address MAC_1 arrives from the network, the I/O module knows from the mapping table that the packet should be directed to vNIC_5.
In certain embodiments, data transfer between servers and their assigned vNICs is flow controlled per individual vNIC. The flow control may be provided by a transport protocol used for communication between servers and their remote I/O resources. When standard internal NICs are overwhelmed with transmitted traffic, a transmit queue becomes filled to capacity and the driver or application issuing the packets determines that no additional packets can be sent. Therefore, in certain embodiments, the flow control is achieved all the way to the application generating the traffic. This approach may be more desirable than dropping packets that cannot be transmitted. vNICs of the IOD 107 may be configured to provide similar functionality. Since a reliable transport protocol is used between the servers and the IOD 107, the vNIC driver on the server can queue packets until they are consumed by the remote vNIC I/O module. If the queue is full, the driver may notify the sender that it has run out of transmit buffer space in the same fashion that a local NIC driver performs this task.
According to various embodiments, the server sends an I/O control block (IOCB) containing a command (e.g. a SCSI command) as well as various I/O control information, such as buffer information for data to be read or written. This IOCB propagates to the HBA according to the flow protocols described below. The two basic commands are the ones for reading data from and writing data to a target storage device.
The vHBA I/O module 205 may provide N_Port ID virtualization (NPIV) functionality. NPIV enables multiple Fibre Channel initiators to share a single physical port. For example, each vHBA can be viewed as a separate initiator on the port. In this case, each vHBA that terminates on the port appears with its own world-wide name (WWN) on the Fibre Channel fabric. This approach makes management of vHBAs similar to other HBAs, including functions like Fibre Channel zoning configuration.
In certain embodiments, the vHBA buffer manager 403 is responsible for managing buffering of data when it is transferred from the servers to the Fibre Channel HBA 407, and vice versa. The queue manager 405 may be used to enforce quality-of-service properties on the data transfer. For example, the queue manager 405 may modulate the transfer of data to and from the servers per vHBA to comply with the committed and peak bandwidth configurations for each vHBA. In certain embodiments, data transfers are initiated by the vHBA I/O module 205 using RDMA Read operations for reading data from server memory and RDMA Write operations for writing data to server memory, which is described further in more details. Servers typically do not initiate data transfers. Instead, the servers are configured to send commands. As such, quality-of-service guarantees may be provided at the granularity of individual vHBAs, which is not available in other conventional approaches, such as encapsulation of Fibre Channel over Ethernet (FCoE). FCoE does not provide throttling of an individual flow of HBA traffic since there are no FCoE or Ethernet flow control mechanisms which operate at the granularity of individual HBAs. FCoE only enables flow control of an entire link or an entire traffic class, which is an inherent limitation of FCoE.
In certain embodiments, a vHBA is configured to boot a server from an image stored in a storage device on the Fibre Channel network. For example, software residing on flash memory of the server, such as the expansion memory on the Ethernet NIC of the server, may be used for this purpose. When a server boots, it may execute the software residing in this memory. This software, in turn, discovers a boot vHBA, which is assigned to the server on an IOD, and proceeds to boot the server from a storage device, which is assigned to the server as its boot device. The assignment of servers to boot devices can be configured through the IOD management system. Such functionality enables changing the server's purpose, thus achieving the decoupling of both the I/O profile and the boot image from the server. In other words, the server's entire identity can be changed dynamically, which includes both its I/O connectivity and its operating system.
It should be understood that Fibre Channel is just one example of a storage connectivity technology that can be used for the described systems and methods. Other storage connectivity technologies include Internet Small Computer System Interface (iSCSI), Serial ATA (SATA), and Serial Attached SCSI (SAS).
Description of the elements (601-620) illustrated in
A NIC driver typically includes a packet transmit path and a packet receive path. The packet transmit path is activated whenever the upper level software passes a packet to the driver. The packet receive path is activated when the NIC receives a packet from the network, and it needs to forward the packet to the upper layers of the network stack.
In certain embodiments, a vNIC driver implements the transmit and receive paths. Packets to be transmitted may be queued in a transmit queue. The packets are sent to the remote vNIC I/O module using the reliable send operation (such as RC Send) of the transport protocol. The vNIC I/O module will then send the packet to the external Ethernet network. Once the send is complete, the packet is de-queued from the transmit queue. Since the transport protocol is reliable, the completion of the send operation signifies that the vNIC I/O module acknowledged that the packet was received. For the vNIC receive path, the driver uses the receive operation (such as RC Receive) of the transport protocol. The receive operation is asynchronous. When the vNIC I/O module receives a packet from the external Ethernet network, and the packets needs to be sent to the server, the I/O module performs a send operation, which results in a completion of a receive operation on the server. The driver is notified of the completion, and it then processes the new packet by forwarding it to the network stack.
The write flow starts with a server 101 sending an I/O control block (IOCB) to the TCA 301 (arrow 701) according to certain embodiments. For example, an IOCB may be sent by an RC Send command with one or more IOCBs. A wide variety of IOCB formats are available. In many embodiments, an IOCB includes a buffer memory address, and a buffer length. Furthermore, it may include a write command, such as a SCSI Write. Multiple buffer address and length values may be provided in the event that the buffer is fragmented and needs to be represented as a scatter-gather list. Furthermore, a queue of the vHBA I/O module may be configured to store 32, 64, 128, or any other number of outstanding commands at one time. Once the IOCB reaches the target channel adapter 301, the adapter may reply with an acknowledgement and pass the command to the virtualization logic 401 for processing using an internal protocol (e.g., with Ethernet headers removed).
According to various embodiments, the virtualization logic 401 then requests the data to be written from the server memory, for example, by sending an RDMA Read Request 703 back to the server 101. The server 101 replies and initiates a data transfer associated with RDMA Read responses 705 in
In general, the write flow may be considered as a combination of two protocols. The first protocol is one between the servers 101-103 and the virtualization logic 401, which includes the target channel adapter 301. The second protocol is between the virtualization logic 401 and the HBA 407.
According to various embodiments, the write flow starts with the server 101 sending an I/O control block (IOCB) using an RC Send operation to TCA 301. In certain embodiments, an IOCB includes a buffer memory address, and a buffer length. In addition, it may include a read command, such as a SCSI Read. The buffer information specifies the memory area on the server where the read data should be placed. Once the IOCB reaches the target channel adapter 301, the adapter may reply with an acknowledgement and pass the command to the virtualization logic 401 for processing.
The virtualization logic 401 then updates the pointer of the HBA 407 to indicate a new IOCB on the request queue. The HBA 407 requests the IOCB from the virtualization logic 401 by sending an IOCB request command 805. The IOCB is then forwarded 807 to the HBA 407. The data read from the disk is then transferred from the HBA 407 to the memory of the virtualization logic 401 in a series of transfers 809. The virtualization logic 401 fetches the data from the memory and sends it to the server as RDMA Write commands 811. The server may respond with an acknowledgement after receiving the last data packet. Once all data is read from the HBA 407, it sends a completion message, shown as Response IOCB 813, to the virtualization logic 401. This response is then forwarded to the server 101. Finally, the virtualization logic 401 updates the response queue index 817, so that the response queue entry can be reused.
In addition to the RC protocol referenced above, any other RDMA protocol applicable over Ethernet fabrics, such as iWARP, may be used.
In addition to the buffered approaches described above for the vHBA write and read flows, a cut-through approach may be implemented in certain embodiments. With a cut-through approach, RDMA Read data arriving at the virtualization logic 401 from the server 101 is sent immediately to the HBA 407 without buffering. Similarly, data arriving at the virtualization logic 401 from the HBA 407 is sent immediately to the server 101 by RDMA Write without buffering.
According to certain embodiments, the multicast discovery packets are sent (arrow 907) to a pre-established (and known to the server) multicast address, i.e., that of directory service 903, using Ethernet layer 2 multicast. All IODs on the same Ethernet network are configured to listen to multicast discovery packets, which are sent to the address known to the server. The discovery packet may contain server information (e.g., name, OS version, MAC address, firmware version, and other information). Any IOD that receives this packet creates a server object within the information model with the attributes contained in the discovery packet. If a server profile is present for this physical server 101 on the IOD, the directory service 903 responds to the server 101 with a unicast packet that contains information about the IOD (arrow 909). The server 101 then uses the information contained in the unicast packet to establish a connection with the session manager 901 of the IOD 107 over a reliable communication channel (arrow 911). Once the session has been established, the session manager 901 uploads to the server information on the virtual I/O resources, such as vNICs and vHBAs, allocated to the server (arrow 913) and information on how to reach these resources.
An IOD may contain one or more I/O modules of the same type or a combination of I/O modules of different types, such as vHBA I/O module and vNIC I/O module. Virtual I/O devices, such as vNICs and vHBAs are implemented in the respective I/O modules. The process 1000 may continue with servers being associated with vNICs and/or vHBAs of the IOD (block 1004). Multiple servers may have virtual I/O resources on the same I/O modules or on different I/O modules. The I/O modules may be responsible for enforcing quality-of-server guarantees, such as committed and peak data rates, for the virtual I/O devices.
According to various embodiments, the IOD can provide flexible termination points for the I/O resources assigned to servers. The IOD may be connected to multiple Ethernet networks and/or Fibre Channel networks. In certain embodiments, the process 1000 includes operation 1006 for connecting multiple output ports of the IOD to multiple external devices. Connection of a server to one or more networks is performed by assigning the server's vNICs and/or vHBAs to these networks. Therefore, servers can be connected to different physical networks without a need for re-cabling or any other physical intervention.
The process 1000 may include operation 1008 for mapping vNICs and vHBAs to the output ports. Various embodiments of this operation are described above in the context of management protocol, learning, and other processes.
Although the foregoing invention has been described in some detail for purposes of clarity of understanding, it will be apparent that certain changes and modifications may be practiced within the scope of the appended claims. It should be noted that there are many alternative ways of implementing the processes, systems and apparatus of the present invention. Accordingly, the present embodiments are to be considered as illustrative and not restrictive, and the invention is not to be limited to the details given herein.
This application is a continuation application of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/544,744, filed on Aug. 20, 2009, titled “REMOTE SHARED SERVER PERIPHERALS OVER AN ETHERNET NETWORK FOR RESOURCE VIRTUALIZATION,” which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety for all purposes.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5621913 | Tuttle et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5754948 | Metze | May 1998 | A |
5815675 | Steele et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5898815 | Bluhm et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
6003112 | Tetrick | Dec 1999 | A |
6069895 | Ayandeh | May 2000 | A |
6145028 | Shank et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6157955 | Narad et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6247086 | Allingham | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6253334 | Amdahl et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6282647 | Leung et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6308282 | Huang et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6314525 | Mahalingham et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6331983 | Haggerty et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6343324 | Hubis et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6377992 | Plaza et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6393483 | Latif et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6401117 | Narad et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6418494 | Shatas et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6430191 | Klausmeier et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6466993 | Bonola | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6470397 | Shah et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6578128 | Arsenault et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6594329 | Susnow | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6628608 | Lau et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6708297 | Bassel | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6725388 | Susnow | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6757725 | Frantz et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6779064 | McGowen et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6804257 | Benayoun et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6807581 | Starr et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6823458 | Lee et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6898670 | Nahum | May 2005 | B2 |
6931511 | Weybrew et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6937574 | Delaney et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6963946 | Dwork et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6970921 | Wang et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
7011845 | Kozbor et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7046668 | Pettey et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7093265 | Jantz et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7096308 | Main et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7103064 | Pettey et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7103888 | Clayton et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7111084 | Tan et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7120728 | Krakirian et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7127445 | Mogi et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7143227 | Maine | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7159046 | Mulla et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7171434 | Ibrahim et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7171495 | Matters et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7181211 | Phan-Anh | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7203842 | Kean | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7209439 | Rawlins et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7213246 | van Rietschote et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
7219183 | Pettey et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7240098 | Mansee | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7260661 | Bury et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7269168 | Roy et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7281030 | Davis | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7281077 | Woodral | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7281169 | Golasky et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7307948 | Infante et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7308551 | Arndt et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7334178 | Aulagnier | Feb 2008 | B1 |
7345689 | Janus et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7346716 | Bogin et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7360017 | Higaki et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7366842 | Acocella et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7386637 | Arndt et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7395352 | Lam et al. | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7412536 | Oliver et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7421710 | Qi et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7424529 | Hubis | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7433300 | Bennett et al. | Oct 2008 | B1 |
7457897 | Lee et al. | Nov 2008 | B1 |
7457906 | Pettey et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7478173 | Delco | Jan 2009 | B1 |
7493416 | Pettey | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7502884 | Shah et al. | Mar 2009 | B1 |
7509436 | Rissmeyer | Mar 2009 | B1 |
7516252 | Krithivas | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7602774 | Sundaresan et al. | Oct 2009 | B1 |
7606260 | Oguchi et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7609723 | Munguia | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7634650 | Shah et al. | Dec 2009 | B1 |
7669000 | Sharma et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7711789 | Jnagal et al. | May 2010 | B1 |
7733890 | Droux et al. | Jun 2010 | B1 |
7782869 | Chitlur Srinivasa | Aug 2010 | B1 |
7783788 | Quinn et al. | Aug 2010 | B1 |
7792923 | Kim | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7793298 | Billau et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7821973 | McGee et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7836332 | Hara et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7843907 | Abou-Emara et al. | Nov 2010 | B1 |
7849153 | Kim | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7865626 | Hubis | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7870225 | Kim | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7899928 | Naik et al. | Mar 2011 | B1 |
7933993 | Skinner | Apr 2011 | B1 |
7937447 | Cohen et al. | May 2011 | B1 |
7941814 | Okcu et al. | May 2011 | B1 |
8041875 | Shah et al. | Oct 2011 | B1 |
8180872 | Marinelli et al. | May 2012 | B1 |
8180949 | Shah et al. | May 2012 | B1 |
8185664 | Lok et al. | May 2012 | B1 |
8195854 | Sihare | Jun 2012 | B1 |
8200871 | Rangan et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8218538 | Chidambaram et al. | Jul 2012 | B1 |
8228820 | Gopal Gowda et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8261068 | Raizen et al. | Sep 2012 | B1 |
8285907 | Chappell et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8287044 | Chen et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8291148 | Shah et al. | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8392645 | Miyoshi | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8397092 | Karnowski | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8443119 | Limaye et al. | May 2013 | B1 |
8458306 | Sripathi | Jun 2013 | B1 |
8677023 | Venkataraghavan et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8892706 | Dalal | Nov 2014 | B1 |
9083550 | Cohen et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
9064058 | Daniel | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9264384 | Sundaresan et al. | Feb 2016 | B1 |
9331963 | Krishnamurthi et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
20010032280 | Osakada et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010037406 | Philbrick et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020023151 | Iwatani | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020065984 | Thompson et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020069245 | Kim | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020152327 | Kagan et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030007505 | Noda et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030028716 | Sved | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030037177 | Sutton et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030051076 | Webber | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030081612 | Goetzinger et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030093501 | Carlson et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030099254 | Richter | May 2003 | A1 |
20030110364 | Tang et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030118053 | Edsall et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030126315 | Tan et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030126320 | Liu et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030126344 | Hodapp, Jr. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030131182 | Kumar et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030165140 | Tanq et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030172149 | Edsall et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030200315 | Goldenberg et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030200363 | Futral et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030208614 | Wilkes | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030212755 | Shatas et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030226018 | Tardo et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030229645 | Mogi et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040003140 | Rimmer | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040003141 | Matters et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040003154 | Harris et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040008713 | Knight et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040025166 | Adlung et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040028063 | Roy et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040030857 | Krakirian et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040034718 | Goldenberg et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040054776 | Klotz et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040057441 | Li et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040064590 | Starr et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040078632 | Infante et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040081145 | Harrekilde-Petersen et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040107300 | Padmanabhan et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040123013 | Clayton et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040139237 | Rangan et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040151188 | Maveli et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040160970 | Dally et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040172494 | Pettey et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040179529 | Pettey et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040210623 | Hydrie et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040218579 | An | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040225719 | Kisley et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040225764 | Pooni et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040233933 | Munguia | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040236877 | Burton | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050010688 | Murakami et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050033878 | Pangal et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050039063 | Hsu et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050044301 | Vasilevsky et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050050191 | Hubis | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050058085 | Shapiro et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050066045 | Johnson et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050080923 | Elzur | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050080982 | Vasilevsky et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050091441 | Qi et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050108407 | Johnson et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050111483 | Cripe et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050114569 | Bogin et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050114595 | Karr et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050120160 | Plouffe et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050141425 | Foulds | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050160251 | Zur et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050182853 | Lewites et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050188239 | Golasky et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050198410 | Kagan et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050198523 | Shanbhag et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050232285 | Terrell et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050238035 | Riley | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050240621 | Robertson et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050240932 | Billau et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050262269 | Pike | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060004983 | Tsao et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060007937 | Sharma | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060010287 | Kim | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060013240 | Ma et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060045089 | Bacher | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060045098 | Krause | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060050693 | Bury et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060059400 | Clark et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060092928 | Pike et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20061012969 | Kagan et al. | Jun 2006 | |
20060168286 | Makhervaks et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060168306 | Makhervaks et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060136570 | Pandya | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060179178 | King | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060182034 | Klinker et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060184711 | Pettey et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060193327 | Arndt et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060200584 | Bhat | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060212608 | Arndt et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060224843 | Rao et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060233168 | Lewites et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060242332 | Johnsen et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060253619 | Torudbakken et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060282591 | Krithivas | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060292292 | Brightman et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070050520 | Riley | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070067435 | Landis et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070101173 | Fung | May 2007 | A1 |
20070112574 | Greene | May 2007 | A1 |
20070112963 | Dvkes et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070130295 | Rastogi et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070220170 | Abjanic et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070286233 | Latif et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080025217 | Gusat et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080082696 | Bestler | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080159260 | Vobbilisetty et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080192648 | Galles | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080205409 | McGee et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080225877 | Yoshida | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080270726 | Elnozahy et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080301692 | Billau et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080307150 | Stewart et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090070422 | Kashyap et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090141728 | Brown et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090296579 | Dharwadkar | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090307388 | Tchapda | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100010899 | Lambert | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100088432 | Itoh | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100138602 | Kim | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100195549 | Aragon et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100232450 | Maveli et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100293552 | Allen et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110153715 | Oshins et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110154318 | Oshins et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20120072564 | Johnson | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120079143 | Krishnamurthi et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120144006 | Wakamatsu et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120158647 | Yadappanavar et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120163376 | Shukla et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120163391 | Shukla et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120166575 | Ogawa et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120167080 | Vilayannur et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120209905 | Haugh et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120239789 | Ando et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120304168 | Raj Seeniraj et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130031200 | Gulati et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130080610 | Ando | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130117421 | Wimmer | May 2013 | A1 |
20130138758 | Cohen et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130145072 | Venkataraghavan et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130159637 | Forqette et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130179532 | Tameshige et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130201988 | Zhou et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20140122675 | Cohen et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20150134854 | Tchapda | May 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1703016 | Nov 2005 | CN |
104823409 | Aug 2015 | CN |
2912805 | Sep 2015 | EP |
2912805 | Jun 2016 | EP |
2912805 | May 2017 | EP |
2014070445 | May 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Bhatt, Ajay V. “Creating a Third Generation I/O Interconnect”, Intel® Developer Network for PCI Express* Architecture, www.express-lane.org, pp. 1-11. |
Balakrishnan et al., Improving TCP/IP Performance over Wireless Networks, Proc. 1st ACM Int'l Conf. on Mobile Computing and Networking (Mobicom), Nov. 1995, 10 pages. |
Figueiredo et al, “Resource Virtualization Renaissance”, May 2005, IEEE Computer Society, pp. 28-31. |
HTTP Persistent Connection Establishment, Management and Termination, section of ‘The TCP/IP Guide’ version 3.0, Sep. 20, 2005, 2 pages. |
Kesavan et al., Active CoordinaTion (ACT)—Toward Effectively Managing Virtualized Multicore Clouds, IEEE, 2008. |
Liu et al., High Performance ROMA-Based MPI Implementation over InfiniBand, ICS'03, San Francisco, ACM, Jun. 23-26, 2003, 10 pages. |
Marshall (Xsigo Systems Launches Company and 1/0 Virtualization Product, Sep. 15, 2007, vmblog.com, “http://vmblog.com/archive/2007/09/15/xsigo-systems-launches-company-and-i-o-virtualization-product.aspx” accessed on Mar. 24, 2014). |
Poulton, Xsigo—Try it out, I dare you, Nov. 16, 2009. |
Ranadive et al., IBMon: Monitoring VMM-Bypass Capable InfiniBand Devices using Memory Introspection, ACM, 2009. |
Spanbauer, Wired or Wireless, Choose Your Network, PCWorld, Sep. 30, 2003, 9 pages. |
TCP Segment Retransmission Timers and the Retransmission Queue, section of ‘The TCP/IP Guide’ version 3.0, Sep. 20, 2005, 3 pages. |
TCP Window Size Adjustment and Flow Control, section of ‘The TCP/IP Guide’ version 3.0, Sep. 20, 2005, 2 pages. |
Wikipedia's article on ‘Infiniband’, Aug. 2010. |
Wong et al., Effective Generation of Test Sequences for Structural Testing of Concurrent Programs, IEEE International Conference of Complex Computer Systems (ICECCS'05), 2005. |
Xu et al., Performance Virtualization for Large-Scale Storage Systems, IEEE, 2003, 10 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/083,258, Non-Final Office Action dated Jul. 11, 2008, 12 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/083,258, Final Office Action dated Feb. 2, 2009, 13 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/083,258, Non-Final Office Action dated Nov. 12, 2009, 13 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/083,258, Final Office Action dated Jun. 10, 2010, 15 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/083,258, Non-Final Office Action dated Mar. 28, 2011, 14 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/083,258, Non-Final Office Action dated Apr. 25, 2012, 30 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/083,258, Final Office Action dated Oct. 26, 2012, 30 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/083,258, Advisory Action dated Jan. 24, 2013, 3 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/083,258, Final Office Action dated Apr. 18, 2014, 37 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/083,258, Non-Fina; Office Action dated Sep. 10, 2014, 34 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/083,258, Final Office Action dated Mar. 19, 2015, 37 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/083,258, Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 5, 2015, 8 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/086,117, Non-Final Office Action dated Jul. 22, 2008, 13 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/086,117, Final Office Action dated Dec. 23, 2008, 11 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/086,117, Non-Final Office Action dated May 6, 2009, 12 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/086,117, Non-Final Office Action dated Jul. 22, 2010, 24 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/086,117, Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 27, 2010, 15 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/145,698, Non-Final Office Action dated Mar. 31, 2009, 22 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/145,698, Final Office Action dated Aug. 18, 2009, 22 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/145,698, Non-Final Office Action dated Mar. 16, 2011, 24 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/145,698, Final Office Action dated Jul. 6, 2011, 26 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/145,698, Non-Final Office Action dated May 9, 2013, 13 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/145,698, Notice of Allowance, dated Oct. 24, 2013, 15 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/179,085, Non-Final Office Action dated May 31, 2007, 14 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/179,085, Response to Non-final Office Action filed Aug. 10, 2007, 8 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/179,085, Final Office Action dated Oct. 30, 2007, 13 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/179,085, Pre Appeal Brief Request mailed on Jan. 24, 2008, 6 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/179,085, Preliminary Amendment dated May 27, 2008, 9 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/179,085, Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 11, 2008, 4 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/179,437, Non-Final Office Action dated May 8, 2008, 11 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/179,437, Final Office Action dated Jan. 8, 2009, 13 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/179,437, Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 1, 2009, 8 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/184,306, Non-Final Office Action dated Apr. 10, 2009, 5 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/184,306, Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 10, 2009, 4 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/200,761, Office Action dated Mar. 12, 2009. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/200,761, Final Office Action dated Aug. 13, 2009. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/200,761, Non-Final Office Action dated Jan. 20, 2010, 22 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/200,761, Final Office Action dated Jul. 9, 2010, 22 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/200,761, Advisory Action dated Aug. 31, 2010, 3 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/200,761, Non-Final Office Action dated Aug. 31, 2012, 21 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/200,761, Office Action dated Feb. 7, 2013, 22 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/200,761, Advisory Action dated Apr. 19, 2013, 3 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/200,761, Non-Final Office Action dated Jun. 11, 2013, 21 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/200,761 Final Office Action dated Jan. 9, 2014, 23 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/200,761, Non-Final Office Action dated Mar. 11, 2015, 24 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/200,761, Final Office Action dated Oct. 22, 2015, 22 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/200,761, “Non-Final Office Actions”, dated Jul. 27, 2016, 21 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/200,761, Final Office Action dated Feb. 9, 2017, 7 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/200,761, Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 23, 2017, all pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/222,590, Non-Final Office Action dated Mar. 21, 2007, 6 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/222,590, Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 18, 2007, 5 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/250,842, Non-Final Office Action dated Aug. 10, 2010, 9 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/250,842, Response to Non-Final Office Action filed Nov. 19, 2010, 8 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/250,842, Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 18, 2011, 5 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/250,842, Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 10, 2011, 5 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/544,744, Non-Final Office action dated Jun. 6, 2012, 25 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/544,744, Final Office Action dated Feb. 27, 2013, 27 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/544,744, Non-Final Office action dated Apr. 4, 2014, 29 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/544,744, Final Office Action dated Nov. 7, 2014, 31 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/544,744, Non-Final Office action dated Sep. 24, 2015, 28 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/544,744, Final Office Action dated Jun. 1, 2016, 33 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/544,744, Non-Final Office action dated Jan. 30, 2017, 32 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/544,744, Final Office Action dated Aug. 25, 2017, 33 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/544,744, Notice of Allowance, dated Jan. 3, 2018, 8 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/862,977, Non-Final Office Action dated Mar. 1, 2012, 8 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/862,977, Non-Final Office Action dated Aug. 29, 2012, 9 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/862,977, Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 7, 2013, 11 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/890,498, Non-Final Office Action dated Nov. 13, 2011, 10 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/890,498, Final Office Action dated Feb. 7, 2012, 9 Pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/890,498, Advisory Action dated Apr. 16, 2012, 4 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/890,498, Non-Final Office Action dated May 21, 2013, 22 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/890,498, Final Office Action dated Nov. 19, 2014, 21 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/890,498, Advisory Action dated Jan. 27, 2015, 3 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/890,498, Non-Final Office Action dated Mar. 5, 2015, 24 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/890,498, Final Office Action dated Jun. 17, 2015, 24 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/890,498, Advisory Action dated Aug. 25, 2015, 3 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/890,498, Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 30, 2015, all pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/890,498, Supplemental Notice of Allowability, dated Jan. 14, 2016, 2 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/229,587, Non-Final Office Action dated Oct. 6, 2011, 4 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/229,587, Response to Non-Final Office Action filed Jan. 4, 2012, 4 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/229,587, Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 19, 2012, 5 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/445,570, Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 20, 2012, 5 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/663,405, Non-Final Office Action dated Nov. 21, 2014, 19 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/663,405, Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 12, 2015, 13 pages. |
Chinese Application No. 201380063351.0, Office Action dated May 2, 2017, 16 pages (7 pages for the original document and 9 pages for the English translation). |
Chinese Application No. 201380063351.0, Office Action dated Dec. 11, 2017, (3 pages of the original document and 9 pages for the English translation). |
Chinese Application No. 201380063351.0, Notice of Decision to Grant dated Mar. 6, 2018, (no English Version Available), 2 pages. |
European Application No. 13850840.3, Extended European Search Report dated May 3, 2016, 6 pages. |
European Application No. 13850840.3, Notice of Decision to Grant dated Dec. 15, 2016, all pages. |
International Application No. PCT/US2013/065008, International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated May 14, 2015, 6 pages. |
International Application No. PCT/US2013/065008, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Apr. 16, 2014, 17 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180227248 A1 | Aug 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12544744 | Aug 2009 | US |
Child | 15944391 | US |