1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to remote staged furnace burner configurations, and more particularly, to the placement of secondary fuel gas nozzles separate and remote from the burners resulting in lower NOX production.
2. Description of the Prior Art
Gas burner furnaces are well known and have been used in reforming and cracking operations and the like for many years. Radiant wall burner furnaces generally include radiant wall burners having central fuel gas-air mixture burner tubes surrounded by annular refractory tiles which are adapted for insertion into openings in the furnace wall. The burner nozzles discharge and burn fuel gas-air mixtures in directions generally parallel and adjacent to the internal faces of the refractory tiles. The combustion of the fuel gas-air mixtures causes the faces of the burner tiles to radiate heat, e.g., to process tubes, and undesirable flame impingement on the process tubes is thereby avoided. Radiant wall burners are typically installed in several rows along a furnace wall. This type of configuration is usually designed to provide uniform heat input to the process tubes from the wall area comprising the radiant wall burner matrix.
Vertical cylindrical furnaces, cabin furnaces and other similar furnaces such as boilers are also well known. Vertical cylindrical furnaces generally include an array of burners on the floor of the furnace that discharge and burn fuel gas-air mixtures vertically. Process tubes are positioned vertically around the burners and adjacent to the cylindrical wall of the furnace whereby heat from the burning fuel gas-air mixtures radiates to the process tubes.
Cabin furnaces and other similar furnaces generally include an array of two or more burners on the rectangular floor of the furnace that discharge and burn fuel gas-air mixtures vertically. Horizontal process tubes are arranged on opposite walls of the furnace which are parallel to the burner array. Additional process tubes can also be arranged adjacent to the top of the furnace. Heat from the burning fuel gas-air mixtures radiates to the process tubes.
More stringent environmental emission standards are continuously being imposed by governmental authorities which limit the quantities of gaseous pollutants such as oxides of nitrogen (NOX) that are introduced into the atmosphere. Such standards have led to the development of staged or secondary fuel burner apparatus and methods wherein all of the air and some of the fuel is burned in a first zone and the remaining fuel is burned in a second downstream zone. In such staged fuel burner apparatus and methods, an excess of air in the first zone functions as a diluent which lowers the temperature of the burning gases and thereby reduces the formation of NOX. Desirably, furnace fuel gases function as a diluent to lower the temperature of the burning secondary fuel and thereby reduce the formation of NOX.
Similarly, staged burner designs have also been developed wherein the burner combusts a primary fuel lean mixture of fuel gas and air and stage fuel risers discharge secondary fuel. The location of the secondary fuel risers can vary, depending on the manufacturer and type of burner, but they are typically located around and adjacent to the perimeter of the primary burner.
While the staged burners and furnace designs have been improved whereby combustion gases containing lower levels of NOX are produced, additional improvement is necessary. Thus, there are needs for improved methods of burning fuel gas and air using burners whereby fuel gases having lower NOX levels are produced.
Furnace burner configurations are provided utilizing one or more burners that burn lean primary fuel gas-air mixtures and one or one or more arrays of secondary fuel gas nozzles that burn secondary fuel gas located separate and remote from the one or more burners. Secondary fuel gas is introduced into the secondary fuel gas nozzles in an amount that constitutes a substantial portion of the total fuel provided to the combustion zone by the lean primary fuel gas-air mixtures and the secondary fuel gas. Preferably, the secondary fuel gas nozzles are positioned on the furnace wall or on the furnace floor, or both, and direct secondary fuel gas to various locations including a location on the opposite side of the combustion zone from the burners. As a result, NOX levels in the combustion gases leaving the furnace are substantially reduced.
In a preferred arrangement in a wall burner furnace, the furnace wall is at least substantially vertical and the radiant wall burners are approximately parallel and approximately evenly spaced in rows and columns, and the secondary fuel gas nozzles are positioned in a single row with each nozzle positioned directly below a radiant wall burner in the row above. In another preferred configuration, the radiant wall burners are approximately parallel with the burners approximately evenly spaced in rows and columns, and the secondary fuel gas nozzles are positioned below the radiant wall burners in an upper row and a lower row, wherein each nozzle of the upper row is directly below a burner in the row above and wherein each nozzle of the lower row is midway between the horizontal positions of the nozzles directly above it. In yet another preferred configuration, the radiant wall burners are offset halfway from one another in a staggered positioning, and the secondary fuel gas nozzles are positioned in a single or double row directly below the radiant wall burners with each nozzle positioned to continue the staggered positioning. In still another configuration, a first row of secondary fuel gas nozzles is located below all the radiant wall burners and a second row of secondary gas nozzles is located about midway up the rows of radiant wall burners. In other preferred arrangements, secondary fuel gas nozzles are also located on the furnace floor, and the furnace can include floor burners (also referred to as hearth burners) with or without secondary fuel gas nozzles on the floor. Preferably, the secondary fuel gas nozzles have tips with at least one fuel delivery orifice designed to eject fuel gas at an angle relative to the longitudinal axis of the nozzle. More preferably, the secondary fuel gas nozzles have multiple fuel delivery orifices.
In a preferred arrangement in a vertical cylindrical furnace having vertical process tubes, primary burners are positioned on the floor of the furnace that discharge and burn fuel gas lean-air mixtures vertically. One or an array of secondary fuel gas nozzles are also positioned on the floor of the furnace, on the walls of the furnace, or both, whereby the secondary fuel gas nozzles are separate and remote from the primary burners. The secondary fuel is directed by the secondary fuel gas nozzle or nozzles to mix with fuel gases in the furnace and then combust with excess air to thereby lower the temperature of the burning fuel gas and reduce the formation of NOX.
In a preferred arrangement in a cabin furnace and other similar furnaces having horizontal process tubes, primary burners are positioned on the floor of the furnace that discharge and burn fuel gas lean-air mixtures vertically. One or an array of secondary fuel gas nozzles are also positioned on the floor of the furnace, on the walls of the furnace, or both, whereby the secondary fuel gas nozzles are separate and remote from the primary burners. The secondary fuel is directed by the secondary fuel gas nozzle or nozzles to first mix with fuel gases in the furnace and then combust with excess air to thereby lower the temperature of the burning fuel gas and reduce the formation of NOX.
Other features and advantages of the present invention will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art upon a reading of the description of preferred embodiments which follows when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
A preferred radiant wall furnace burner configuration of this invention utilizes rows of multiple radiant wall burners that include annular refractory tiles and burn fuel gas lean air mixtures connected to a wall of the furnace in a regular spacing and an array of secondary fuel gas nozzles located separate and remote from the radiant wall burners with means for introducing secondary fuel gas into the secondary fuel gas nozzles and wherein the secondary fuel gas constitutes a substantial portion of the total fuel provided to the combustion zone by the fuel gas-air mixtures and the secondary fuel gas. Preferably, the secondary fuel gas nozzles are positioned on the furnace wall adjacent to the rows of radiant wall burners or on the furnace floor, or both, and direct secondary fuel gas to various locations including a location on the opposite side of the combustion zone from the radiant wall burners. As a result, NOX levels in the combustion gases leaving the furnace are reduced.
Referring now to the drawings,
In the remote staged fuel technique of the present invention, the secondary fuel gas from or adjacent each radiant wall burner 10 is eliminated. Instead, the secondary fuel gas is injected into the furnace at a remote location. As shown in
Referring to
Each radiant wall burner 10 is provided a mixture of primary fuel gas and air wherein the flow rate of air is greater than stoichiometry relative to the primary gas. Preferably the rate of air is in the range of from about 105% to about 120% of the stoichiometric flow rate required to completely combust the primary and secondary fuel gas. Secondary fuel gas is discharged into the furnace by way of secondary fuel gas nozzles 26. The burner configuration of
Additional examples of preferred patterns are illustrated in
The furnace walls 31 with the radiant wall burners 10 and secondary fuel gas nozzles 26 connected thereto are described above as if the walls are vertical, but it is to be understood that the walls can be at an angle from vertical or the walls can be horizontal.
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Thus, as will now be understood by those skilled in the art, a variety of combinations of radiant wall burners 10 and separate and remote secondary fuel gas nozzles can be utilized in radiant wall gas burner furnaces in accordance with this invention to reduce NOX levels in furnace fuel gases.
Any radiant wall burner can be used in the present inventive configurations and methods. Radiant wall burner designs and operation are well known to those skilled in the art. Examples of radiant wall burners which can be utilized include, but are not limited to, the wall burners described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,180,302 issued on Jan. 19, 1993 to Schwartz et al., and in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/949,007, filed Sep. 7, 2001 by Venizelos et al. and entitled “High Capacity/Low NOX Radiant Wall Burner,” the disclosures of which are both incorporated herein by reference.
Referring now to
In an alternate arrangement as shown in
As shown in
Referring now to
In an alternate arrangement as shown in
As shown in
While different furnace types have been described herein, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that the furnace burner configurations of this invention can be utilized in any combustion furnace to reduce NOX formation.
Preferably, the total fuel gas-air mixture flowing through the furnace burners contains less than about 80% of the total fuel supplied to the combustion zone 28.
The secondary fuel gas nozzles are disposed on the furnace floor or walls extending about 1 to about 12 inches into the furnace interior. Fuel gas is preferably supplied at a pressure in the range of from about 20 to about 50 psig.
The secondary fuel gas nozzles positioned on the walls of furnaces and illustrated in
When the secondary fuel gas nozzles are positioned on the walls or floors of vertical cylindrical furnaces, cabin furnaces and other similar furnaces, they can include fuel gas delivery openings therein that discharge secondary fuel gas in multiple directions.
A low NOX producing furnace of the present invention having walls and a floor comprises:
A method of the present invention for burning fuel gas and air in a furnace whereby fuel gases of reduced NOX content are formed comprises the following steps:
In order to further illustrate the furnace burner configuration and method of the present invention, the following example is given.
A comparison was made of the NOX emissions using radiant wall burners with and without remote staging. The test furnace utilized an array of 12 radiant wall burners arranged in 3 columns of 4 burners each. The burners were spaced 50 inches apart in each column and the columns were spaced 36.5 inches apart. The furnace was operated while supplying secondary gas to the center of the radiant wall burners and the NOX in the furnace off gas was measured over time. The furnace was then operated after removing secondary gas from the burner centers and conducting the secondary gas to remote nozzles located adjacent to the columns of radiant wall burners.
Thus, the present invention is well adapted to attain the objects and advantages mentioned as well as those that are inherent therein. While numerous changes may be made by those skilled in the art, such changes are encompassed within the spirit of this invention as defined by the appended claims.
This application is a Continuation-In-Part of application Ser. No. 10/758,642 filed on Jan. 15, 2004 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,025,590.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4496306 | Okigami et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4652232 | Schwartz et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4661685 | Contri | Apr 1987 | A |
D289600 | Thomas | May 1987 | S |
D289963 | Thomas | May 1987 | S |
4663849 | Nickelson | May 1987 | A |
4664617 | Schwartz et al. | May 1987 | A |
D290215 | Sonnentag et al. | Jun 1987 | S |
D290218 | Thomas | Jun 1987 | S |
4673798 | Contri et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
D290889 | Steinkamp | Jul 1987 | S |
4683369 | Rieckman et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4686352 | Nawrot et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4702691 | Ogden | Oct 1987 | A |
4737100 | Schnell et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4781578 | Napier | Nov 1988 | A |
4788918 | Keller | Dec 1988 | A |
4798150 | Pressnall et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4838184 | Young et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4870910 | Wright et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4900244 | Keller et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4901652 | Pressnall et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4902484 | Martin et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4922838 | Keller et al. | May 1990 | A |
4952137 | Schwartz et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4975042 | Schwartz et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
5098282 | Schwartz et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5154596 | Schwartz et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5154735 | Dinsmore et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5180302 | Schwartz et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5195844 | Goans | Mar 1993 | A |
5195884 | Schwartz et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5238395 | Schwartz et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5275552 | Schwartz et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5345771 | Dinsmore | Sep 1994 | A |
5573391 | Benson et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5688115 | Johnson | Nov 1997 | A |
5718573 | Knight et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5813849 | Schwartz et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5846068 | Schwartz et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5951741 | Dahl et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6000930 | Kelly et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6062848 | Lifshits | May 2000 | A |
6231334 | Bussman et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6347935 | Schindler et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6379146 | Zink et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6383461 | Lang | May 2002 | B1 |
6383462 | Lang | May 2002 | B1 |
6422858 | Chung et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6464492 | Guarco et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6478239 | Chung et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6486375 | Lenhart et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6524098 | Tsirulnikov et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6565361 | Jones et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6607376 | Poe | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6616442 | Venizelos et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6632083 | Bussman et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6634881 | Bussman et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
20020076668 | Venizelos et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2076705 | Sep 1993 | CA |
0 562 710 | Sep 1993 | EP |
1 108 952 | Jun 2001 | EP |
6-18011 | Jan 1994 | JP |
2633452 | Jul 1997 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050158684 A1 | Jul 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10758642 | Jan 2004 | US |
Child | 10807977 | US |