The field of the invention relates to an apparatus and method for clamping a borehole seismic sensor (e.g., an accelerometer, a geophone sensor, etc.) within a borehole (e.g., a well bore) to ensure good coupling to the borehole wall, down hole formations, or both.
A sonde is an instrument probe used to automatically obtain information (e.g., vibration, pressure, temperature, etc.) about its surroundings (e.g., underground, under water, in the atmosphere, and the like). Seismic sensors are routinely placed within well bores to obtain information regarding the properties, structure, and activity of the earth in the area surrounding the well bore. Seismic sensor sondes may be individual units or multi-sonde tools linked together via, for example, a cable. In order to obtain accurate seismic data, the sensors or sondes are desirably rigidly coupled to the well bore in order to retrieve the seismic data. Often, the outer surface of a well bore is cemented to the surrounding earth, so that by securing the sensors to the well bore, the sensors are in effect coupled to the earth.
The sensors are typically lowered into the well bore many hundreds or even thousands of feet before they are clamped into position. Therefore, it is desirable that the clamp have a low drag as it is lowered into position. Typically, the clamping mechanism of a sensor is in the retracted position while lowering the sensor array/string to the desired position. The clamping mechanism or mechanisms is or are actuated (e.g., extended) to lock the sensor or sensors in place after the desired depth is reached. The activation and deactivation of the clamping mechanism is usually performed remotely by an operator at the surface. Actuation can be electronic, hydraulic, pneumatic, or accomplished using any other suitable mechanism.
Another key parameter of a borehole clamping mechanism is the clamping force versus the total weight of the sensor and housing. It is generally desirable within the industry to have a clamping force-to-weight ratio of 10, whereas clamping forces less than that ratio may not provide an acceptable level of mechanical coupling to the borehole surface. In certain applications, passive bow spring clamps and/or magnetic clamps having a much lower clamping force-to-weight ratio are adequate. These types of clamps are always engaged both during installation and during data collection. As a result of the clamps always being engaged, the total drag force during installation must be overcome by a weight at the bottom of the sensor array or electric tractor; however, there are practical limits to the amount of weight that can be added to the bottom of the sensor array, and tractors require high electrical current, necessitating copper conductors within the entire length of the sensing array and lead cable.
For borehole clamps that are not passive (i.e., they rely on a remotely actuated mechanism to engage and disengage the clamping force), several variations exist. The most widely used clamp employs an integral electric motor and lead screw arrangement to position a clamping mechanism. Advantages of such an arrangement include a high clamping force and a simple design. Disadvantages of such an arrangement include the need for electrical power in the borehole, and design considerations to avoid sparks or electrical discharges down hole. Most such electrically powered systems have a short lifetime in high temperature borehole environments (e.g., above 150° C.).
Clamping mechanisms that rely on hydraulic actuation have also been used. Such mechanisms include expandable bladders or actuator arms actuated by hydraulic pressure. Advantages of such hydraulic mechanisms include no electrical power down hole and a high clamping force. Disadvantages of such hydraulic mechanisms include the hydrostatic effects of the wellbore and the height of fluid in the hydraulic line which could be thousands of feet. Alternatively, a high pressure gas can be used to actuate a down-hole clamp, but the gas pressure must be high enough to overcome the down-hole pressure, which may be tens of thousands of pounds per square inch (psi).
One method that is currently being used to overcome the hydrostatic effects due to the height of the fluid column in a hydraulically actuated system is to use the well bore fluid as the hydraulic fluid. Such systems typically employ a check valve at the bottom of the hydraulic line that allows the well bore fluid to flow into the hydraulic line until the water level in the hydraulic line matches the water level in the well bore. Pneumatic pressure applied from the surface to the hydraulic line closes the check valve and pressurizes the hydraulic line, thus actuating the clamping force. To release the clamping force, a substantially higher and overpressure is applied which releases a blowout plug which relieves the hydraulic pressure. These systems tend to be unreliable, however, and are susceptible to clogging of the valve with wellbore debris.
With the advent of fiber optic down-hole seismic sensors, electronics and electrical power are often unavailable down hole. Thus, it would be desirable to provide a simple, high-performance borehole clamping system that does not require down-hole electronics or electrical power, and that can operate equally well at both high and low pressures and both high and low temperatures. There remains a need in the industry for such a system.
To meet this and other needs, and according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, a remotely actuated clamping device for a borehole seismic sensing system is provided. The remotely actuated clamping device includes a clamping mechanism configured to engage a surface of a borehole by actuation of the clamping mechanism. The remotely actuated clamping device also includes a fluid based actuator configured to actuate the clamping mechanism. The fluid based actuator includes a chamber configured to be kept at a pressure that is isolated from an ambient pressure of the borehole. The fluid based actuator also includes a piston within the chamber. The chamber receives a pressurized fluid to move the piston within the chamber to actuate the clamping mechanism. The pressure used to actuate the clamping mechanism is independent of the ambient pressure of the borehole.
According to another exemplary embodiment of the present invention, another remotely actuated clamping device for a borehole seismic sensing system is provided. The remotely actuated clamping device includes a clamping mechanism configured to engage an inside surface of a borehole due to actuation of the clamping mechanism. The remotely actuated clamping device also includes a fluid based actuator configured to actuate the clamping mechanism. The fluid based actuator has a chamber including a piston dividing the chamber into a first region and a second region. The fluid based actuator also has a connecting rod assembly extending through an entire length of the chamber and beyond each of two sides of the chamber. The connecting rod assembly is coupled to the piston such that movement of the piston within the chamber results in movement of the connecting rod assembly. The connecting rod assembly is engaged with the clamping mechanism at a position outside of the chamber such that the clamping mechanism is configured to be actuated by motion of the connecting rod assembly. An area of the fluid based actuator outside of the chamber is configured to be exposed to an ambient pressure of the wellbore.
According to yet another exemplary embodiment of the present invention, a method of remotely operating a clamping device within a borehole is provided. The method includes the steps of: (a) lowering an array of one or more seismic sensing assemblies into a borehole; and (b) actuating a clamping mechanism of the seismic sensing assembly such that the clamping mechanism is engaged against a surface of the borehole, wherein the clamping mechanism is actuated by applying a fluid pressure to a fluid based actuator of the seismic sensing assembly, wherein the pressure used to actuate the clamping mechanism is independent of the ambient pressure of the borehole.
It is to be understood that both the foregoing general description and the following detailed description are exemplary, but are not restrictive, of the invention.
The invention is best understood from the following detailed description when read in connection with the accompanying drawing. It is emphasized that, according to common practice, the various features of the drawing are not to scale. On the contrary, the dimensions of the various features are arbitrarily expanded or reduced for clarity. Included in the drawing are the following figures:
As will be explained in greater detail below, according to certain exemplary embodiments of the present invention, improved clamping devices for borehole seismic sensors are provided. Exemplary clamping devices for securing down-hole seismic sensors to the inside of a borehole (e.g., a well bore) are provided which improve the mechanical coupling of seismic disturbances from the earth surrounding the borehole to the sensor. Such a clamping device is powered by a fluid based (e.g., pneumatic or hydraulic) actuator that is pressure-compensated to minimize the effects of ambient pressure. The clamping device may be integral to a sonde (e.g., a sensor housing) or it can be fastened to an existing sensor housing. A borehole sensor array includes a string of one or more seismic sensor sondes, each containing one or more seismic sensors. Each of the seismic sensor sondes and/or each of the seismic sensors may include one or more of the inventive clamping devices. The seismic sensors may desirably include a housing to protect the sensors from borehole pressure and fluids.
As provided above, conventional fluid based actuators may have to overcome the effects of the height of the wellbore fluid column and the height of the fluid in the fluid line which could be tens of thousands of feet. Thus, the pressure required can easily be thousands of psi. According to the present invention, because the fluid based actuator is pressure compensated, a substantially reduced pressure (e.g., on the order of hundreds of psi) may be used to simply overcome a spring in the actuator chamber. This is because the fluid of the borehole (e.g., oil, gas, etc.) acts on both ends of the connecting rod/beam, except within the chamber as described below), and as such, there is no need to overcome the ambient pressure level.
Referring to
Clamping device 102 is secured to seismic sensor 100 (e.g., using one or more securing mechanisms). Clamping device 102 has a clamping mechanism 105 (including a clamp arm 106 and a foot member 108) and a fluid based actuator 110 (e.g., a pneumatic actuator 110) that is configured to operate clamp arm 106 through a connecting rod 112. More specifically (when the fluid based actuator is pneumatic as described herein), an increase in pneumatic pressure provided by fluid line 104 operates fluid based actuator 110, which in turn moves connecting rod 112 (e.g., through motion of a piston in fluid based actuator 110, not shown in
In accordance with various exemplary embodiments of the present invention, the pressure seen by the various elements of seismic sensor 100, including the ends of connecting rod 112, but excluding a chamber (including a piston) within fluid based actuator 110, is an ambient pressure of borehole 120. This reduces the magnitude of the fluid pressure used to actuate fluid based actuator 110 for actuating the clamping mechanism because the ambient pressure of borehole 120 does not need to be overcome by the applied fluid pressure.
Fluid based actuator 110 may have a number of different configurations.
Fluid based actuator 210 shown in
In
The devices illustrated in
Although illustrated and described above with reference to certain specific embodiments, the present invention is nevertheless not intended to be limited to the details shown. Rather, various modifications may be made in the details within the scope and range of equivalents of the claims and without departing from the spirit of the invention.
This application claims the benefit of priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/676,565, filed on Jul. 27, 2012, the contents of which are incorporated in this application by reference.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2013/052476 | 7/29/2013 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2014/018959 | 1/30/2014 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2846662 | Sparks | Aug 1958 | A |
3474539 | Moore | Oct 1969 | A |
3504743 | Winters | Apr 1970 | A |
3683326 | White | Aug 1972 | A |
3831443 | Planche | Aug 1974 | A |
4155005 | Knowlton et al. | May 1979 | A |
4255015 | Adams et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
4292628 | Sadler | Sep 1981 | A |
4428422 | Laurent | Jan 1984 | A |
4648039 | Devaney et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4800267 | Freal et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4819760 | Petermann | Apr 1989 | A |
4826322 | Philips | May 1989 | A |
4879755 | Stolarczyk et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4893930 | Garrett et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4994668 | Lagakos et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5011262 | Layton | Apr 1991 | A |
5051799 | Paul et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5172117 | Mills et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5212354 | Miller et al. | May 1993 | A |
5227857 | Kersey | Jul 1993 | A |
5242020 | Cobern | Sep 1993 | A |
5367376 | Lagakos et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5397891 | Udd et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5493390 | Varasi et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5680489 | Kersey | Oct 1997 | A |
5712932 | Alexander et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5798834 | Brooker | Aug 1998 | A |
5986749 | Wu et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6104492 | Giles et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6157711 | Katz | Dec 2000 | A |
6281976 | Taylor et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6315075 | Nakajima | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6328837 | Vohra et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6381048 | Chraplyvy et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6453022 | Weinman, Jr. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6654521 | Sheng et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6819812 | Kochergin et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6891621 | Berg et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6900726 | Graves | May 2005 | B2 |
7013729 | Knudsen et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7282697 | Thomas et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7683312 | Goldner et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7840105 | Goldner et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7994469 | Goldner et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
7999946 | Andersen et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8153956 | Goldner et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8165469 | Moslehi et al. | Apr 2012 | B1 |
8240207 | Andersen et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8330096 | Goldner et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8401354 | Goldner et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
20020063866 | Kersey et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020064331 | Davis et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020064332 | Martin | May 2002 | A1 |
20030094281 | Tubel | May 2003 | A1 |
20030145654 | Knudsen et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040046111 | Swierkowski | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040060697 | Tilton | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040114463 | Berg et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040246816 | Ogle | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050076713 | Knudsen | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050097955 | Berg et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050111788 | Tsuyama | May 2005 | A1 |
20060120675 | Goldner et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070024857 | Menezo | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070065149 | Stevens et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20080137589 | Barrett | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20090101800 | Goldner et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090140852 | Stolarczyk et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090210168 | Vincelette | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100005860 | Coudray et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100219334 | LeGrand | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20120006109 | Andersen et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120216615 | Andersen et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120227504 | Goldner et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120257208 | Andersen et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120257209 | Andersen et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130025375 | Goldner et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130034351 | Goldner et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130099104 | Goldner et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130162432 | Goldner et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130201484 | Goldner et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2643296 | Sep 2004 | CN |
101199413 | Jun 2008 | CN |
2001-221684 | Aug 2001 | JP |
2006-172339 | Jun 2006 | JP |
2007-232515 | Sep 2007 | JP |
10-1997-0002776 | Jan 1997 | KR |
10-2002-0008457 | Jan 2002 | KR |
9905493 | Feb 1999 | WO |
2007036721 | Apr 2007 | WO |
2011050227 | Apr 2011 | WO |
2011050275 | Apr 2011 | WO |
2011103032 | Aug 2011 | WO |
2011103271 | Aug 2011 | WO |
2011103290 | Aug 2011 | WO |
2012103085 | Aug 2012 | WO |
2012122352 | Sep 2012 | WO |
2013028515 | Feb 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2013/052476 issued by the Korean Intellectual Property Office on Nov. 1, 2013. |
1st Office Action dated May 31, 2013 (with English translation) issued by the State Intellectual Property Office (SIPO) of the People's Republic of China for Chinese Patent Application No. 201080047796.6. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2010/025248 issued by the Korean Intellectual Property Office on Oct. 11, 2011. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2010/053659 issued by the Korean Intellectual Property Office on Aug. 2, 2011. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2010/053763 issued by the Korean Intellectual Property Office on Jul. 28, 2011. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2011/024465 issued by the Korean Intellectual Property Office on Oct. 27, 2011. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2011/025206 issued by the Korean Intellectual Property Office on Oct. 17, 2011. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2012/022356 issued by the Korean Intellectual Property Office on Sep. 3, 2012. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2012/028224 issued by the Korean Intellectual Property Office on Sep. 24, 2012. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2012/051338 issued by the Korean Intellectual Property Office on Mar. 14, 2013. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2013/039498 issued by the Korean Intellectual Property Office on Sep. 16, 2013. |
Tang et al., “Rapidly Tunable Optical Add-Drop Multiplexer (OADM) Using a Static-Strain-Induced Grating in LiNb03”, Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 236-245, Jan. 31, 2003, See Abstract and Figures 1-2, pp. 236-237. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140246210 A1 | Sep 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61676565 | Jul 2012 | US |