Remotely adjustable interactive bone reshaping implant

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11357547
  • Patent Number
    11,357,547
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, April 30, 2019
    5 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, June 14, 2022
    2 years ago
Abstract
According to some embodiments, systems and methods for reshaping bone are provided. The systems may include an implant body, an actuator coupled to the implant body, a sensor configured to detect a parameter indicative of a biological condition, a transceiver, and a controller. The transceiver may be configured to transmit data associated with the parameter to an external remote control and receive instructions from the external remote control. Finally, the controller is configured to move the actuator in response to the instructions from the external remote control, wherein the actuator adjusts the implant body. The methods may include measuring a parameter indicative of a biological condition; transmitting data associated with the parameter from the implantable device to an external remote control; transmitting instructions from the external remote control to the implantable device; and actuating the bone growth device in response to the instructions from the external remote control.
Description
INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE TO ANY PRIORITY APPLICATIONS

Any and all applications for which a foreign or domestic priority claim is identified in the Application Data Sheet as filed with the present application are hereby incorporated by reference under 37 CFR 1.57.


BACKGROUND

The present invention relates to orthopedic methods and devices for the gradual modification of bones or correction of bone deformities. In particular, the present invention relates to a variety of bone reshaping devices configured to perform procedures, including the lengthening of a bone, the shortening of a bone, the healing of a fracture, the changing of a bone angle, the rotation of a bone, the adjustment of the curvature or torsion of a bone, the realignment or repositioning of a joint or a vertebra, the reforming or supporting of the shape of the spinal column, or combinations thereof, all of which are considered species of “reshaping” as used herein. More specifically, the present invention relates to methods and systems concerning bone reshaping devices that can be externally adjusted based on measured parameters indicative of biological conditions.


External fixation devices, adjustable in length and angular attitude, are commonly utilized for correcting certain angular and longitudinal defects of long bones of limbs. Such fixation devices essentially comprise clamps which hold groups of bone screws inserted in the portions of the bone affected by defects, such clamps being slidably mounted on elements or guides longitudinally positionable externally to the limb to be treated.


The correction is normally carried out gradually with the aid of compression/distraction devices which act on the mobile clamps while the bone callous regenerates itself permitting its manipulation until the desired correction is obtained.


For example, in limb lengthening, the bone is commonly surgically divided into two segments, and wires and half pins are inserted into bone segments above and below the surgical bone cut and are attached to rings of a rigid framework interconnected by struts or telescopic connection rods. The rigid framework is used to gradually push the two bone segments apart longitudinally over a period of time (e.g., one millimeter a day). This allows the bone to gradually form in the gap between bone segments created by this distraction technique. Once the desired amount of lengthening is achieved (e.g., 5-6 cm), the external apparatus is stabilized into a fixed position and left on the bone segments until complete mineralization of the newly formed bone occurs (e.g., 3-6 months, depending on the nature of pathology and amount of lengthening).


Similarly, in deformity correction, the bone is surgically divided (usually at the apex of the deformity) into two segments, and wires and half pins are inserted into bone segments above and below the surgical bone cut and attached to rings of a rigid framework. Opposite rings of the rigid framework are connected together by threaded rods with attached uni-planar or multi-planar hinges and angular distractors that are used to gradually push the two bone segments apart angularly over a period of time.


The use of such external fixation devices can present certain disadvantages. The external fixator can be unwieldy, painful for the patient, and also subjects the patient to the risk of pin track infections, joint stiffness, loss of appetite, depression, cartilage damage, and other side effects. Having the external fixator in place also delays the beginning of rehabilitation. In some circumstances, the visibility of the external fixator can lead to patient embarrassment or insecurity.


In response to these shortcomings, the art developed implantable devices that could be positioned under the skin and/or in bones. These devices were designed to correct bone deformities by applying force to bones, including compressive forces to promote healing, distractive forces to promote lengthening, and angular forces to change the angle/curvature of bones. Some desirable aspects of these implantable devices were that they could apply steady forces over defined periods of time, did not have external wires or rods that could bother the patient or cause pain, had reduced risks of infections, and were not readily visible.


Yet, even these implantable devices could have limitations as well in some cases. For example, because of their location under the skin, some implants could be difficult for care providers to observe, monitor, and adjust. As such, additional surgical procedures would sometimes be performed to incrementally adjust an implant as therapeutically required. The additional surgical procedures exposed patients to increased risks of infection, longer healing times, injury, and increased pain.


In other cases, even where adjustments to implants could be made through the skin, the therapeutic effects of the implant could be less than optimal. Under-application of force could lead to poor bone reformation and/or require longer recovery times. Over-application of force could lead to injury, further bone deformation, and also longer recovery times. Moreover, frequent visits to see a practitioner for adjustments could be time consuming or otherwise inconvenient for a patient.


Thus, notwithstanding the efforts of the prior art, there remains a need for an improved technology for controlling implantable bone reshaping devices in order to improve their performance and efficacy.


SUMMARY

In accordance with one embodiment, a bone growth device is provided. The bone growth device comprises an implant body, an actuator, a sensor, a transceiver, and a controller. The actuator is coupled to the implant body. The sensor is configured to detect a measurable parameter indicative of a biological condition. The transceiver is configured to transmit data associated with the measurable parameter to an external remote control and receive instructions from the external remote control. Finally, the controller is configured to move the actuator in response to the instructions thm1 the external remote control, wherein the actuator adjusts the implant body.


In accordance with another embodiment, an external remote control for a bone growth device is provided. The external remote control comprises a first transceiver, an input, and a controller. The first transceiver is configured to receive data associated with a measurable parameter from the bone growth device and to transmit instructions for the bone growth device. The input is for receiving care information from a care provider. Finally, the controller is configured to: 1.) receive the data associated with a measurable parameter and care information; and 2.) generate the instructions for the bone growth device based on at least one of the data associated with a measurable parameter and care information.


In accordance with another embodiment, a method for treating a patient using an implantable device is provided. The method comprises the steps of: measuring a measurable parameter indicative of a biological condition; transmitting data associated with the measurable parameter fhm1 the implantable device to an external remote control: transmitting instructions from the external remote control to the implantable device; and actuating the bone growth device in response to the instructions from the external remote control.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The disclosed aspects will hereinafter be described in conjunction with the appended drawings, provided to illustrate and not to limit the disclosed aspects, wherein like designations denote like elements.



FIG. 1 is a high level schematic of an example bone reshaping implant.



FIG. 2 is a high level schematic of an example external remote controller.



FIG. 3 shows one embodiment illustrating how an implant may attach to a bone and communicate with an external remote controller.



FIG. 4 shows another embodiment illustrating how an implant may be attached to two sides of a bone and may also be in communication with an external remote controller.



FIG. 5 shows another embodiment illustrating how an implant may be attached to vertebrae and may also be in communication with an external remote controller.



FIG. 6 is an example of an implantable device that can be adjusted by external stimulus.



FIG. 7 is an example of how an implantable device may be attached to a bone using screws.



FIG. 8 illustrates an example embodiment having an implantable intramedullary device.



FIG. 9 is a side view of a bone reshaping device, adapted for axial lengthening and shortening.



FIG. 10a illustrates a longitudinal cross-section view of the device of FIG. 9, taken along lines 10a-10a.



FIG. 10b illustrates a detailed view of the lengthening device of FIG. 10a, from the area of circle 10b.



FIG. 11 illustrates an example external remote controller for wirelessly controlling and communicating with the implantable device of FIG. 8.



FIG. 12 illustrates a perspective view of some of the internal components of the device of FIG. 9.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Various embodiments are described herein, which provide methods and systems related to bone reshaping devices that can be externally controlled and adjusted in response to parameters measured by the implant, to enable therapy to be optimized for each patient in response to measurable indicium of biological response obtained from the sensors on the implant.


It will be of course understood that various omissions, substitutions, and changes in the form and details of the alternatives illustrated can be made without departing from the spirit of the disclosure. Additionally, the various features and processes described herein can be used independently of one another, or can be combined in various ways. All possible combinations and subcombinations are intended to fall within the scope of this disclosure. Many of the alternatives described herein include similar components, and as such, these similar components can be interchanged in different aspects of the invention.


There has been a long felt need for implantable bone shaping devices that can be effectively and/or adaptively adjusted for therapy. The present disclosure describes a number of illustrative examples detailing how an implant may measure parameters of a patient indicative of a biological condition (e.g., osteogenesis), and interpret or display such information for further therapeutic treatment.


Examples of conditions contemplated as potentially treatable in accordance with the present invention include congenital deformities (birth defects), such as congenital short femur; fibular hemimelia (absence of the fibula, which is one of the two bones between the knee and the ankle); hemiatrophy (atrophy of half of the body); and Ollier's disease (also known as multiple endochondromatosis, dyschondroplasia, and endochondromatosis); developmental deformities, such as neurofibromatosis (a rare condition which causes overgrowth in one leg); and bow legs, resulting from rickets (rachitis) or secondary arthritis; post-traumatic injuries, such as growth plates fractures; malunion or non-union (when bones do not completely join, or join in a faulty position after a fracture); shortening and deformity; bone defects; infections and diseases, such as osteomyelitis (a bone infection, usually caused by bacteria); septic arthritis (infections or bacterial arthritis); and poliomyelitis (a viral disease which may result in the atrophy of muscles, causing permanent deformity); reconstruction after removal of tumors; short stature, such as achondroplasia (a form of dwarfism where arms and legs are very short, but torso is more normal in size); constitutional short stature; and others as may be apparent to those of skill in the art in view of the disclosure herein.



FIG. 1 shows an example high level schematic of a bone shaping implant 1000. Bone shaping implant 1000 has a number of operative modules 1004. These operative modules may include a sensor 1005, actuator 1006, and transceiver 1007. In some embodiments, the sensor 1005 may be onboard to the implant as illustrated in this example. However, the sensor may also be off-board or adjacent to the processor, which will be later illustrated and described. The sensor 1005 may include: a foil strain gauge; a semiconductor strain gauge; a stress sensor; a pH sensor; a thermometer; a pressure sensor; a displacement sensor (e.g., a film resistor where resistance changes as film is stretched); an electrical conductivity/resistance sensor; an acoustic conductivity/resistance sensor; a bio sensor (e.g., a sensor configured to sense the presence or aggregation of platelets, erythrocytes, growth factors, and other biological facilitators of bone healing); and/or any other sensor known in the art for measuring biologically or physiologically relevant data.


These aforementioned sensors may be used to measure parameters that are indicative of a biological condition, such as osteogenesis, ossification, osteoconduction, osteoinduction, and osteopromotion. In some cases, the measured parameters may indicate a deficiency, such as aplastic anemia, additional bone fractures, brittle bones, or improper bone healing. The measured parameters may also allow the calculation of blood flow, bone mass, bone composition, bone density, bone thickness, bone perfusion, bone strength, and bone oxygenation. The sensors may also be generally configured to measure other biological parameters, such as temperature, pulse, blood flow, blood oxygenation, body composition, respiration, cardiac activity, movement, blood volume, pH, heart-beat, metabolism, and blood composition.


Actuator 1006 may be actuated by a driven magnet system, electrical motor, solenoid/ratchet system, piezoelectric system (e.g., an inchworm motor), shape memory alloy (e.g., Nitol), magnetostrictive elements, gesticulation, and/or any way of driving an actuator known in the art. The movement of the actuator 1006 may drive a modification of the bone shaping implant such as: axial elongation; axial shortening; bending (e.g., deformity correction); twisting (e.g., trauma); expression of active media (e.g., releasing treatment or growth factors); delivery of therapeutic current, ultrasound, radio waves, or magnetic flux across a fracture or bone; delivery of therapeutic compression or vibration across a fracture or bone (e.g., a 1 Hz vibration); any therapeutic delivery of movement, energy, or substances; and/or, any combination of the aforementioned provisions. The active media might include HMG-CoA reductase, epidermal growth factor (EGF), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), fibroblast growth factor (FGF), anti-microbials, and/or antibacterials. More active media that promote bone growth are described in U.S. Patent Pub. 2012/0276205, which is incorporated herein by reference. These active media may be delivered by the actuator 1006, or otherwise administered to a patient to facilitate bone adjustment.


Transceiver 1007 may be configured to communicate with other internal and external components. For example, transceiver 1007 may be configured to send and receive information to an internal sensor, such as sensor 1005. Also for example, transceiver 1007 may transmit/receive data to an external source, such as an external remote control (ERC) device. In some embodiments, transceiver 1007 may transmit data obtained by sensor 1005, processor/control 1001, memory 1002, or any part of the bone reshaping implant 1000 to an external source, such as an ERC. This data may be raw data (e.g., changes in electrical current), measured parameters (e.g., temperature, displacement, or strain), processed information (e.g., a status or biological condition), instructions, interrogatory signals, or any other data, information, or signal relevant to the implant or external device. In some cases, the transceiver 1007 may transmit post action status information to an external device, such as an ERC. For example, such information may include treatment histories, status logs, diagnostic information, recorded data from sensor 1005, and/or data concerning a biological condition.


Transceiver 1007 may also be configured to communicate using Bluetooth (e.g., Bluetooth low energy), ZigBee, Wi-Fi, induction wireless data transmission, medical implant communication service (MICS), radio frequencies, near-field communication (NFC), global system for mobile communications (GSM), or any other form of wireless data transmission.


In certain embodiments, transceiver 1007 may be further configured to communicate directly or indirectly with another external device, such as a data cloud, personal computer, cellular phone, pager, tablet, mobile device, hospital system, or any other device used by a patient or care provider. In some circumstances, it may be desirable for the implant to transmit diagnostic, status, and/or treatment information to a care provider so that the care provider can evaluate the performance of an implantable device, such as implant 1000, and provide recommendations or actually execute therapy to the patient. In some cases, the external device may transmit back to the implant status information, firmware updates, treatment instructions, recommendations, security locks, or other data, information, or protocols relevant to the performance of the implant and/or treatment of the patient.


The operative modules 1004 may be coupled to a processor/controller 1001 to perform operations such as transmitting/receiving data through transceiver 1007, processing sensor data from sensor 1005, controlling actuator 1006, managing system functions, etc. The processor/controller 1001 may also be coupled to memory 1002, which may include volatile and non-volatile memory, and may provide instructions and data to processor/controller 1001. Processor/controller 1001 typically performs logical and arithmetic operations based on program instructions stored within the memory 1002. The instructions in the memory 1002 may be executable to implement the methods described herein. Processor/controller 1001 may also contain or be coupled to a clock for timing therapies.


A power supply 1003 may be coupled to the processor/controller 1001, memory 1002, and/or operative modules 1004 in order to provide operative energy. The power supply 1003 may be a battery, such as a lithium battery, lithium ion battery, nickel-cadmium battery, nickel-metal hydride battery, nickel-hydrogen battery, carbon-zinc battery, silver-oxide battery, zinc-carbon battery, zinc-air battery, mercury oxide battery, alkaline battery, or any other type of battery known in the art and suitable for subcutaneous implantation. Certain batteries may be rechargeable by an external stimulus, or a transient transcutaneous connection. The power supply may also comprise fuel cells, capacitors, inductive coupling, motion powered piezoelectric, motion powered electromagnetic generators, transcutaneous ports (such as ports for hydraulic connections, electrical connections, and other connections to convey power) and/or energy scavenging systems (e.g., systems that use body heat, respiration cycles, body movement, or biochemical reactions). The power supply 1003 may be selected based on factors such as life (e.g., battery life), biocompatibility, power, rechargability, size, current and voltage output, cost, replaceability, the presence or absence of movable parts, and other factors related to performance in an implantable device.


The power supply may also be managed by a power management strategy depending on the power demands. For example, the power management strategy might institute powered, sleep, and idle cycles. In some cases, the power management strategy might take into account the total power and total intended useful life of implant 1000. In some cases, the power management strategy is implemented by the processor/controller 1001.



FIG. 2 shows an example high level schematic of ERC 2000. ERC 2000 has a number of operative modules. An optional power supply to implant 2005 may be used to supply power to any part of the implant 1000 including the power supply 1003, the processor 1001, the memory 1002, or any of the operative modules 1004. Power supply to implant 2005 may supply energy through a transcutaneous port, such as transcutaneous ports for electric or hydraulic connections, or any sort of transcutaneous connection (e.g., needle penetration to deliver power or fuel). Power supply to implant 2005 may also supply power by facilitating an energy scavenging system. For example, the bone reshaping implant 1000 may receive power by obtaining energy from body heat, the respiration cycle, body movement, biochemical reactions, and/or any form of energy that may already be available in the human body. Power supply to implant 2005 may escalate those operations to supply more power to the implant 1000. By way of illustration, if implant 1000 received energy from body heat, power to implant may contain a chemical and/or heating apparatus administered to raise the temperature at the location of the implant.


The power supply to implant 2005 may also produce motion, vibrations, electric current, magnetisms, inductance, or capacitance in order to provide power to the implant 1000, which may contain, for example, a motion powered electromagnetic generator, a motion powered piezoelectric motor, coupled inductors, capacitors, batteries, and/or any power supply described in this disclosure or known in the art.


Mover 2006 may cause (e.g., stimulate) bone reshaping implant 1000 to move. For example, mover 2006 may cause actuator 1006 to move by supplying mechanical, electrical, magnetic, capacitive, inductive, or any other type of force or energy to the actuator. Certain illustrative examples of such movement will be discussed further in this disclosure. For example, mover 2006 may include magnets that rotate driven magnets within a telescopic implant. The rotation of mover 2006 causes the implant to lengthen and/or shorten.


Transceiver 2007 is configured to communicate with other internal or external components. For example, transceiver 2007 may transmit or receive information from an implantable device, such as implant 1000. In some embodiments, transceiver 2007 may communicate with an implant's transceiver, such as transceiver 1007, to exchange information including raw data (e.g., changes in electrical current), measured parameters (e.g., temperature, displacement, or strain), processed information (e.g., a status, or biological condition), instructions, interrogatory signals, or any other data, information, or signal relevant to the implant or external device.


In certain embodiments, transceiver 2007 may be further configured to communicate with another external device, such as a data cloud, personal computer, cellular phone, pager, tablet, mobile device, hospital system, or any other device used by a patient or care provider. In some circumstances, it may be desirable for the ERC to transmit diagnostic, status, and/or treatment information to a care provider so that the care provider can evaluate the performance of an implantable device, such as implant 1000, and provide services to the patient. In some cases, the external device may transmit back to the ERC status information, firmware updates, treatment instructions, recommendations, security locks, or other data relevant to the performance of the implant and/or treatment of the patient.


Transceiver 2007 may be configured to communicate using Bluetooth (e.g., Bluetooth low energy), ZigBee, Wi-Fi, induction wireless data transmission, medical implant communication service (MICS), radio frequencies, near-field communication (NFC), global system for mobile communications (GSM), or any other form of wireless data transmission.


The operative modules 2004 may be coupled to a processor/controller 2001 to perform operations such as transmitting/receiving data through transceiver 2007, controlling power supply to implant 2005, controlling mover 2006, managing system functions, etc. The processor/controller 2001 may also be coupled to memory 2002, which may include volatile and/or non-volatile memory, and may provide instructions and data to processor/controller 2001. Processor/controller 2001 typically performs logical and arithmetic operations based on program instructions stored within the memory 2002. The instructions in the memory 2002 may be executable to implement the methods described herein. The processor/controller 2001 may also contain or be coupled to a clock for timing therapies. In some circumstances, the processor/controller 2001 may be programmed to automatically make adjustments to an implant based on programmed data and/or data obtained from the implant.


A power supply 2003 may be coupled to the processor/controller 2001, memory 2002, and/or operative modules 2004 in order to provide operative energy. The power supply 2003 may take any form described in this disclosure (e.g., a similar device as power supply 1003), may plug into an electrical socket, or use any other power or energy supply known in the art.


The power supply 2003 may also be managed by a power management strategy depending on the power demands. For example, the power management might institute powered, sleep, and idle cycles. In some cases, the power management strategy might take into account the total power and total intended useful life of ERC 2000. In some cases, the power management strategy is implemented by the processor/controller 2001.


Additionally, a Display/UI may be onboard or external to ERC 2000. For example, Display/UI 2008 is shown as onboard ERC 2000. However, Display/UI 2008 may also be external and connect to ERC 2000 (e.g., in communication with processor/controller 2001) through wireless or wired data paths, such as high-definition multimedia interface, display port, Bluetooth (e.g., Bluetooth low energy), ZigBee, Wi-Fi, induction wireless data transmission, medical implant communication service (MICS), radio frequencies, near-field communication (NFC), global system for mobile communications (GSM), or any other form of data transmission known in the art. In some embodiments, Display/UI 2008 comprises a touch screen, monitor, television, liquid-crystal display, or any other way of visually showing information. Display/UI 2008 may also include a touch panel, button-selection, keyboard, mouse, voice input, roller ball, gesture interface, or any other way of inputting information known in the art. In some cases, Display/UI 2008 may be coupled to a speaker or sound-producing device that can, for example, play audio data, beep, or sound an alarm.


In some circumstances, it may be desirable for Display/UI 2008 to show measured parameters and/or biological conditions to a care provider. The care provider can then make treatment decisions based on the displayed information. For instance, Display/UI 2008 may show the displacement of sensors attached to the implantable device. If the sensors are attached to two points on a bone, and the sensors move farther apart, this occurrence might suggest that osteogenesis and/or bone lengthening is occurring. The care provider may then increase or decrease the force placed on the bone or the adjustment rate as a result of reviewing this information. In some cases the care provider may directly control the force outputted by the implant. For example, the care provider may send instructions to ERC 2000, which can be uploaded to implant 1000. Alternatively, in some embodiments, the care provider may send instructions directly to implant 1000.


In other embodiments, the care provider can send limits to ERC 2000, where the amount of control that a patient has in adjusting implant 1000 with ERC 2000 is limited to a range of values. For example, the care provider can put in safety cutoffs and/or override features. In some circumstances the care provider or patient can shut down implant operation entirely using an override control, such as if there is an emergency.


In some cases, ERC 2000 may be additionally coupled to an imager, such as an ultrasound, x-ray, magnetic resonance imaging, or computed tomography. In some cases, it may be desired to couple the external remote controller with a portable imager, such as an ultrasound, in order to image the bone region. This information can be displayed with Display/UI 2008 and/or transmitted to an external device for viewing by a user (e.g., a care provider). The images can provide additional information concerning bone healing, therapeutic progression, and/or other clinically relevant data. The additional information can further inform adjustment of a bone reshaping implant.


An illustrative interaction between implant 1000 and ERC 2000 is as follows. Implant 1000 detects a measurable parameter indicative of a biological condition (e.g., using sensor 1005). Implant 1000 then transmits data to ERC 2000 (e.g., continuously, periodically, or in response to interrogation). The data may be raw data for ERC 2000 to process, or data already processed by implant 1000. ERC 2000 can then interpret the data in view of stored patient information and/or display the data to a care provider. The ERC 2000 then transmits instructions to the implant 1000, and the implant 1000 acts in response to those instructions. In some cases, the implant 1000 may also transmit post action status information to ERC 2000, such as a treatment history.


For example, for certain patients undergoing a femoral bone lengthening procedure, the optimal rate of distraction may be approximately 1 mm per day. However, the rate of osteogenesis may vary from patient to patient, as well as the discomfort level associated with different rates of distraction. Feedback recorded by the implant indicative of the rate of osteogenesis may be utilized to optimize the distraction rate for given circumstance. Strain gauge data or other data from on onboard sensor may be utilized to monitor the progress of osteogenesis. That data may be retrieved from the implant by the ERC, which internally, or in combination with clinical personnel, can determine that a particular patient can or should have a reduction in distraction rate to no more than about 0.5 mm per day or no more than about 0.75 mm per day. Alternatively, the implant and control systems disclosed herein, either internally or in combination with clinical staff, may determine in a given instance that the patient might benefit from or is willing to increase the distraction rate to no more than about 1.5 mm or no more than about 2 mm per day.


In addition, the ERC may optionally be provided with a fine tuning adjustment to be made by the patient. This would enable the patient to deviate from the programmed distraction rate by an increase or decrease from the preset rate in an amount of no more than about 5%, in some implementations no more than about 10%, and in other implementations no more than about 25%. Attempts to make adjustments outside of the predetermined bracket limits would have no effect. In this manner, the patient would be given sufficient control to enable fine tuning of the distraction rate to take into account discomfort levels or other desires of the patient.



FIG. 3 illustrates one embodiment. The unmodified tibia 10 has a bone reshaping implant 12 attached thereto. The bone reshaping implant 12 may be configured for axial expansion or compression, and/or torsion or other movement necessary to achieve the desired clinical result.


Bone reshaping implant 12 is provided with at least a first attachment point 14 and a second attachment point 16 for attachment to the bone 10. In the illustrated embodiment, first and second attachment points 14 and 16 may be apertures for receiving a first bone screw 15 and a second bone screw 17. Attachment of the implant 12 to the bone 10 may be accomplished in any of a variety of ways, such as by utilizing one or two or more bone screws at each of the first and second attachment points. Alternatively, the first and second attachment points may be connected to a plate, adhesively secured to the bone, secured to a collar or ring which surrounds at least a portion or potentially encircles the bone, or other attachment structure having sufficient structural integrity to achieve the desired clinical result.


The portion of bone located between the first bone screw 15 and second bone screw 17 is the treatment zone, over which forces generated by the bone reshaping implant 12 will be distributed. Although not illustrated, the bone 10 in between the first bone screw 15 and second bone screw 17 will normally contain one or more bone deformities, the correction of which is desired. Also not pictured, the bone 10 in between the first bone screw 15 and second bone screw 17 may contain a bone injury, such as a fracture.


One or more sensors 23 and 24 may be provided. The one or more sensors may be fixed to a location on the implant body 12. The sensors may also be desirably located on the connection points 15 and 17, or to locations in contact with the bone. The sensors 23 and 24 are configured to measure a parameter indicative of a biological condition (e.g., osteogenesis or any of the biological conditions described in this disclosure). They may also be of any type (or combination of any type) described in this disclosure or known in the art. For example, in the particular configuration illustrated, the two sensors 23 and 24 may sense stress (strain gauge) or a distance between each other using, for example, light such as infrared (IR) light, lasers, electric current, inductance, film resistors, acoustics, or any other way of measuring distance between objects known in the art. This distance measurement may be correlated to ostegenesis. For example, if the sensors are moving farther away from each other, successful osteogenesis may be occurring, thereby lengthening the distance between the sensors.


Processor 25 may interpret the outputs of the sensors to calculate a measured parameter. For example, in measuring a strain on the bones, sensors 23 and 24 may output an electric current that is correlated with strain. Processor may then calculate the strain based on those electrical outputs. Additionally processor 25 may also compile data obtained by sensors (e.g., strain over time and/or the different parameters measured by sensors) for a biological conclusion. For example, by factoring pH, temperature, strain, and displacement, the processor 25 may determine whether osteogenesis is occurring and also an indicium of the rate and circumferential regularity or irregularity of osteogenesis. Processor 25 may additionally calculate an amount of force, an amount of increased force, or an amount of decreased force that could be applied to the bone for effective therapeutic treatment or increasing efficacy of treatment.


In some embodiments, the processor 25 may control a modification of treatment. For example, the processor 25 may drive an actuator coupled to the implant body 12, where the actuator may change the amount or angle of force applied to the bone. For example, implant body 12 may contain motors, magnetic coils, and/or elastic members that contract or expand the implant body 12. The contraction may put more compressive force on at least one side of the bone, whereas the expansion may put more distractive force on at least one side of the bone. In either case, the implant body 12, because of its location on one side of the bone, may also put an angular force on the bone.


One or more transceivers 18 may also be provided. The transceiver 18 may be in communication with the bone reshaping implant 12 or the one or more sensors 23 and 24 by a cable 20, or in other embodiments, wirelessly. Transceiver 18 may alternatively be within, or carried by, the implant. Cable 20 may include electrical, optical, fluid, or other conduit, depending upon the functionality of the implant. The transceiver 18 may be configured for transmitting and receiving information. For example, the transceiver 18 may be configured to communicate to an external device using any of the modalities previously mentioned, such as induction wireless data transmission or any other form of wireless data transmission. In some embodiments, the transceiver 18 is configured to transmit data to ERC 22. The data may be data generated by sensors 23 and 24, data outputted by the processor 25, status information, a biological condition, a request for information from an external device, or any other relevant information described in this disclosure.


In some embodiments, transceiver 18 may be configured to transmit data continuously. Such continuous transmission might be desirable in order to allow an external remote control to monitor the patient's conditions and undertake reactive measures when necessary. However, in some circumstances, continuous transmission may require more power, and could lead to low battery life for the implantable device. In other embodiments, transducer 18 may be configured to transmit data periodically, such as every minute, every hour, every day, every week, every month, every year, and/or any period of time, including any time between any two of the aforementioned periods of time. In other embodiments, transceiver 18 may be configured to transmit data in response to an interrogation signal by an ERC 22 or some other external device. In still other embodiments, transceiver 18 may be configured to transmit data in response to an event, for example a sudden change in a measured parameter, reaching a preset trigger threshold in a measured parameter, a detected biological condition, or a change in implant status (e.g, damage to the implant or the implant is out of batteries).


Transceiver 18 may also be configured to receive data transmitted from an ERC 22. This data may contain instructions, such as directions for the processor to drive the actuator. It may also provide a status or request for the transceiver to send data. It may also provide firmware updates and/or updates to algorithms, protocols, or therapies.


In some embodiments, a power supply 26 may also be provided. The power supply 26 may be a battery or any power supply discussed in this disclosure. Power supply may be carried within or on the implant 12, or near the implant as illustrated.


In some embodiments, a memory may be coupled to processor 25 in order to store, for example, processor data, firmware, instructions, power management data, and information to be outputted by the transceiver on interrogation.


ERC 22 may be an ERC with the same functionalities as ERC 2000. In particular, ERC 22 may be in communication with transceiver 18 to receive data from the implant and send responsive instructions to the implant. In some cases, the implant acts in response to ERC 22's instructions. For example, ERC 22's instructions may cause an actuator coupled to implant body 12 to actuate.



FIG. 4 illustrates another embodiment. This embodiment has two bone reshaping implant bodies 40 and 50. In some embodiments, each of implant body 40 and 50 may be coupled to its own sensors. For example, implant body 40 has sensors 55 and 57, and implant body 50 has sensors 52 and 54. There may be one or more internal or external power supply 58 as desirable to power the implants. There may also be one or more internal or external transceiver 51 as desirable to transmit and receive information for the implant bodies 40 and 50. There may also be one or more processors 53 as desirable to process data.


Having two (or more) implants, such as implants 40 and 50, on a bone may be desirable in certain situations in order to better support the bone structure. These implants may be operated jointly or independently, depending on therapeutic applications. For example, two implants putting the same pressure in the same direction on the bone simultaneously from two sides may prevent or tend to correct curvature and/or other deformities to bones during osteogenesis. On the other hand, to improve bone curvature, further angular force may be placed on a bone by compressing one implant and distracting the other, and/or applying different forces to the different implants. In still another application, osteogenesis may occur, in some circumstances, at different rates across a bone. Using multiple implants can compensate for these bone growth differences by applying compensatory compression or distraction therapies.


It should be appreciated that there may be many configurations in which one or more implant may be fixed to bones. For example, there are configurations in the art using four or more implant bodies attached to a femur or spine at various points. Embodiments of the present disclosure are not limited to any particular formation or way of attaching implants to bones.



FIG. 5 illustrates that similar implantable devices may be placed in other parts of the body. For example, one or more implantable devices 510 and 520 may be implanted along the spine in order to adjust the curvature of the spine. For illustrative purposes implant 510 is shown attached to two adjoining vertebrae by two anchoring devices 511 and 512, whereas another device 520 is shown typically in a separate procedure (both illustrated on the same bone for convenience) attached to non-adjoining vertebrae by two anchoring devices 521 and 522. This embodiment can be used to adjust the curvature of the spine, such as to relieve a herniated lumbar disc or the like.


In some embodiments, the implant is configured to be adjusted externally. For example, FIG. 6 shows an expanding or telescopic rod 410. The opposing ends of rod 410 are fixed to selected positions on the bone using conventional surgical screws. For example, rod 410 may be fixed to a bone using screws 542 as depicted in FIG. 7 or FIG. 3. Additionally, or alternatively, rod 410 may be used as an intermedullary implant, or as part of or in conjunction with implants 12, 40, 50, 510, and/or 520. In this way, it should be appreciated, that the externally controlled adjustments to rod 410 can be made based on measured parameters indicating biological conditions. For example, the sensors of implants 12, 40, 50, 510, and/or 520 can transmit relevant data or information, as described in this disclosure, to an ERC. The ERC, or a care provider, can use the information to determine if the ERC should adjust the implant.


The rod 410 may produce a controlled force, slowly over time, under precise external control, and be isolated or implanted completely under the skin and protected by the natural barrier, which the skin provides. Rod 410 may also be small, powerful, simple enough to be readily manufactured, immune to accidental activation, and biologically inert.


The pick-up coil 430 receives energy from an external hand-held source of energy, such as a low frequency generator of electromagnetic radiation, which is brought into proximity with coil 430. Some examples of such a hand-held source of energy are ERC 22, 62, and/or 522. Rod 410 is implanted beneath the skin barrier, while the source of energy is exterior to the body. The external inductive power source may be driven at conventional line frequency. In the event that the coil 430 is to be able to efficiently drive the muscle wire 438, then either a storage capacitor with a control diode can be added in circuit with coil 430, or with more complexity, a battery with a diode voltage multiplier, and control diode could be used. Any means of impedance matching between coil 430 and wire 438 on one hand and between coil 430 and the inductive power source on the other may be employed. The use of external power sources and inductively powered implanted coils is well known to the art and are routinely used, for example, in charging implanted pacemaker devices.


In some alternatives, energy can be fed into the pick-up coil until enough is stored in the capacitor to drive the motor 428. Upon the firing of the motor 428, the hand-held device could sense the discharge, and shut-off for the prescribed lock-out period. In other alternatives, an on-board battery or power supply assists in charging the capacitor, and thus requires significantly more control electronics. For example, such an onboard battery or power supply may be power supply 26, 58, and/or 516.


In certain embodiments and alternatives, an internal processor, such as processors 25, 53, and/or 515 may additionally control the power supply and/or motor 428, such as by enabling or disabling the extension/contraction of rod 410, or by placing limits on such extension/contraction. The processor may also process further instructions, data, statuses, etc. from an ERC.


In some cases, an implant may be placed inside a bone, such as inside the medullary canal. FIG. 8 shows such an implant 110, placed inside a bone. The implant has at least one, and in the illustrated implementation two sensors 301 and 303 such as strain gauges or other disclosed elsewhere herein, coupled to the implant body. It also has processor 302, power supply 304, and transceiver 305.



FIG. 9 further details one particular implant 110 and how it actuates. The implant 110 has one or more distraction shaft screw holes 122 in the distraction shaft 114 through which the screws may be placed. Likewise, the housing 112 is attached to an end cap 130 which has one or more housing screw holes 124 through which the screws may be placed. FIG. 10a shows that the housing 112 of the intramedullary lengthening device 110 includes a magnet housing 128 and splined housing 126. The housings 126, 128 may be attached to each other by means of welding, adhesive bonding, or other joining techniques. The magnet housing 128 is sealably closed at one end (the end opposite the interface with the splined housing 126) by the attachment of the end cap 130. The end cap 130 may be attached to the magnet housing 128 by means of welding, adhesive bonding, or other joining techniques. In use, the distraction shaft 114 is driven from the housing 112 by means of a lead screw 136 which turns inside a nut 140 that is secured to an inner surface adjacent to a cavity 137 of the distraction shaft 114. The lead screw 136 is mechanically coupled, in an indirect manner, to cylindrical permanent magnet 134 contained within the magnet housing 128. Rotation of the cylindrical permanent magnet 134, which is magnetically driven by an external adjustment device 180 (FIG. 11), effectuates rotation of the lead screw 136.


Cylindrical magnet 134 is fixedly contained within a magnet casing 158 using, for example, an adhesive such as an epoxy. The magnet casing 158 rotates relative to the magnet housing 128. The cylindrical magnet 134 may be a rare earth magnet such as Nd—Fe—B and may be coated with Parylene or other protective coatings in addition to being protected within the magnet casing 158, for example hermetically potted with epoxy. The magnet casing 158 contains an axle 160 on one end which attaches to the interior of a radial bearing 132. The outer diameter of the radial bearing 132 is secured to the interior of a radial bearing 132. The outer diameter of the radial bearing 132 is secured to the interior of the end cap 130. This arrangement allows the cylindrical magnet 134 to rotate with minimal torsional resistance. At its other, opposing end, the magnet housing 158 includes an axle 161, which is attached to a first planetary gear set 154. Shown in FIG. 10b, the axle 161 includes the sun gear of the first planetary gear set 154, the sun gear turning the planetary gears of the first planetary gear set 154. The first planetary gear set 154 serves to reduce the rotational speed and increase the resultant torque delivery from the cylindrical magnet 134 to the lead screw 136. A second planetary gear set 156 is shown between the first planetary gear set 154 and the lead screw 136, for further speed reduction and torque augmentation. The number of planetary gear sets and/or the number of teeth in the gears may be adjusted, in order to achieve the desired speed and torque delivery. For example, a lead screw with eighty (80) threads per inch attached to two planetary gear sets of 4:1 gear ratio each inside a 9 mm device with magnet location in the distal femur can achieve at least 100 lb. of distraction force at a greater than average distance or gap from the external device.


In FIG. 12, the housing components have been remove to reveal various internal features, including a collar that allows sliding of the distraction shaft 114 within the housing 112, and which also keeps the distraction shaft 114 from being able to rotate within the housing 112. This allows full stability of the bone 100.



FIG. 11 illustrates an example of an ERC 180 which is used to non-invasively control the bone reshaping implant 110 by means of a magnetic coupling which transmits torque. ERC 180 comprises a magnetic handpiece 178 (e.g., a mover), a control box 176 (containing a processor), which may be integrated with the handpiece, and a power supply 174 such as a battery or external plug for connection to a standard power outlet. The control box 176 includes a control panel 182 having one or more controls (buttons, switches or tactile, motion, audio or light sensors) and a display 184. The display 184 may be visual auditory, tactile, the like, or some combination of the aforementioned features, or any other display/UI described in this disclosure. The control box 176 may further contain a transceiver for communication with transceiver 305 of the implant and/or other external devices. With implant 110, the transceiver may obtain or send information including raw data (e.g., changes in electrical current), measured parameters (e.g., temperature, displacement, or strain), processed information (e.g., a status, or biological condition), instructions, interrogatory signals, or any other data, information, or signal relevant to the implant or external device. With another external device, ERC 180 may send and receive, for example, diagnostic, status, treatment information, and/or any data obtained from the implant to a care provider so that the care provider can evaluate the performance of an implantable device, such as implant 110, and provide services to the patient.


The ERC 180 may also be programmed and/or implement protocols based on data obtained from the implant. For example, ERC 180 (or a care provider) may determine that the rate of compression or distraction should be slowed or accelerated, and adjust the implant accordingly. Alternatively, the ERC may display an appropriate adjustment for the patient to input or cause the ERC to transmit to the implant. Additionally, in some circumstances, ERC 180 may limit a user's ability to make adjustments to therapy depending on therapeutic limits.


A person/one having ordinary skill in the art would further appreciate that any of the various illustrative logical blocks, modules, processors, means, circuits, and algorithm steps described in connection with the aspects disclosed herein may be implemented as electronic hardware (e.g., a digital implementation, an analog implementation, or a combination of the two, which may be designed using source coding or some other technique), various forms of program or design code incorporating instructions (which may be referred to herein, for convenience, as “software” or a “software module), or combinations of both. To clearly illustrate this interchangeability of hardware and software, various illustrative components, blocks, modules, circuits, and steps have been described above generally in terms of their functionality. Whether such functionality is implemented as hardware or software depends upon the particular application and design constraints imposed on the overall system. Skilled artisans may implement the described functionality in varying ways for each particular application, but such implementation decisions should not be interpreted as causing a departure from the scope of the present disclosure.


The various illustrative logical blocks, modules, and circuits described in connection with the aspects disclosed herein and in connection with the figures may be implemented within or performed by an integrated circuit (IC), an access terminal, or an access point. The IC may include a general purpose processor, a digital signal processor (DSP), an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC), a field programmable gate array (FPGA) or other programmable logic device, discrete gate or transistor logic, discrete hardware components, electrical components, optical components, mechanical components, or any combination thereof designed to perform the functions described herein, and may execute codes or instructions that reside within the IC, outside of the IC, or both. The logical blocks, modules, and circuits may include antennas and/or transceivers to communicate with various components within the network or within the device. A general purpose processor may be a microprocessor, but in the alternative, the processor may be any conventional processor, controller, microcontroller, or state machine. A processor may also be implemented as a combination of computing devices, e.g., a combination of a DSP and a microprocessor, a plurality of microprocessors, one or more microprocessors in conjunction with a DSP core, or any other such configuration. The functionality of the modules may be implemented in some other manner as taught herein. The functionality described herein (e.g., with regard to one or more of the accompanying figures) may correspond in some aspects to similarly designated “means for” functionality in the appended claims.


If implemented in software, the functions may be stored on or transmitted over as one or more instructions or code on a computer-readable medium. The steps of a method or algorithm disclosed herein may be implemented in a processor-executable software module which may reside on a computer-readable medium. Computer-readable media includes both computer storage media and communication media including any medium that can be enabled to transfer a computer program from one place to another. A storage media may be any available media that may be accessed by a computer. By way of example, and not limitation, such computer-readable media may include RAM, ROM, EEPROM, optical disk storage, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other medium that may be used to store desired program code in the form of instructions or data structures and that may be accessed by a computer. Also, any connection can be properly termed a computer-readable medium. Combinations of the above should also be included within the scope of computer-readable media. Additionally, the operations of a method or algorithm may reside as one or any combination or set of codes and instructions on a machine readable medium and computer-readable medium, which may be incorporated into a computer program product.


It is understood that any specific order or hierarchy of steps in any disclosed process is an example of a sample approach. Based upon design preferences, it is understood that the specific order or hierarchy of steps in the processes may be rearranged while remaining within the scope of the present disclosure. The accompanying method claims present elements of the various steps in a sample order, and are not meant to be limited to the specific order or hierarchy presented.


Various modifications to the implementations described in this disclosure may be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, and the generic principles defined herein may be applied to other implementations without departing from the spirit or scope of this disclosure. Thus, the disclosure is not intended to be limited to the implementations shown herein, but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the claims, the principles and the novel features disclosed herein. The word “example” is used exclusively herein to mean “serving as an example, instance, or illustration.” Any implementation described herein as “example” is not necessarily to be construed as preferred or advantageous over other implementations.


Certain features that are described in this specification in the context of separate implementations also can be implemented in combination in a single implementation. Conversely, various features that are described in the context of a single implementation also can be implemented in multiple implementations separately or in any suitable sub-combination. Moreover, although features may be described above as acting in certain combinations and even initially claimed as such, one or more features from a claimed combination can in some cases be excised from the combination, and the claimed combination may be directed to a sub-combination or variation of a sub-combination.


Similarly, while operations are depicted in the drawings in a particular order, this should not be understood as requiring that such operations be performed in the particular order shown or in sequential order, or that all illustrated operations be performed, to achieve desirable results. In certain circumstances, multitasking and parallel processing may be advantageous. Moreover, the separation of various system components in the implementations described above should not be understood as requiring such separation in all implementations, and it should be understood that the described program components and systems can generally be integrated together in a single software product or packaged into multiple software products. Additionally, other implementations are within the scope of the following claims. In some cases, the actions recited in the claims can be performed in a different order and still achieve desirable results.

Claims
  • 1. A bone growth device comprising: an implant body having a first connection point between the implant body and a first bone portion, and a second connection point between the implant body and a second bone portion;an actuator coupled to the implant body;a first sensor disposed adjacent the first connection point;a second sensor disposed adjacent the second connection point, each of the first sensor and the second sensor being configured to detect a measurable parameter indicative of a biological condition;a transceiver configured to transmit data associated with the measurable parameter to an external remote control and receive instructions from the external remote control; anda controller configured to move the actuator in response to the measurable parameter detected by the first sensor or the second sensor and the instructions from the external remote control,wherein the actuator performs an adjustment of the implant body, andwherein the transceiver is further configured to transmit post-action status data to the external remote control after the actuator adjusts the implant body.
  • 2. The device of claim 1, further comprising a memory configured to store at least one of the data associated with the measurable parameter, the instructions from the external remote control, and status information.
  • 3. The device of claim 1, wherein the adjustment comprises applying compression between the first connection point and the second connection point.
  • 4. The device of claim 1, wherein the adjustment comprises applying a force to the bone which has at least a component which is non-parallel to a straight line extending through the first connection point and the second connection point.
  • 5. The device of claim 1, wherein the adjustment comprises applying force to lengthen the distance between the first connection point and the second connection point.
  • 6. The device of claim 1, wherein the biological condition is osteogenesis.
  • 7. The device of claim 1, wherein the measurable parameter includes at least one of: a) a distance between the first connection point and the second connection point, orb) a motion between the first connection point and the second connection point, orc) a measurable parameter selected from: blood flow, temperature, strain, pH, stress, bone composition, bone mass, bone density, bone thickness, bone perfusion, bone strength, bone oxygenation, electrical conductivity, and a presence of active media.
  • 8. The device of claim 1, further comprising a power supply configured to be charged by the external remote control, and an energy receiving element configured to receive energy from an external source.
  • 9. The device of claim 1, wherein the implant body is an intramedullary device.
  • 10. The device of claim 1, wherein the transceiver is configured to transmit the data associated with the measurable parameter to the external remote control: a) continuously, orb) periodically, orc) in response to interrogation by the external remote control, ord) in response to an event, wherein the event is a change in the measurable parameter that reaches a preset threshold for the measurable parameter, a change in a status of the bone growth device, or a detected biological condition.
  • 11. The device of claim 1, further comprising a processor configured to process the data associated with the measurable parameter that is output by the first sensor or the second sensor, to calculate the measured parameter.
  • 12. The device of claim 11, wherein the processor is further configured to compile data output by the first sensor and the second sensor to reach a biological conclusion.
  • 13. An external remote control for a bone growth device having an implant body, a first connection point between the implant body and a first bone portion, and a second connection point between the implant body and a second bone portion, the external remote control comprising: a first transceiver configured to receive data associated with a measurable parameter indicative of a biological condition detected from a first sensor of the bone growth device disposed adjacent the first connection point or a second sensor disposed adjacent the second connection point, the first transceiver being further configured to transmit instructions for the bone growth device;an input for receiving care information from a care provider;a memory configured to store at least one of the data associated with the measurable parameter, the care information, and the instructions; anda controller coupled to the memory and configured to: receive the data associated with the measurable parameter and the care information, andgenerate the instructions for the bone growth device based on the data associated with the measurable parameter and the care information.
  • 14. The external remote control of claim 13, wherein the input comprises a second transceiver configured to transmit patient information to the care provider and receive the care information from the care provider.
  • 15. The external remote control of claim 14, wherein the first transceiver and the second transceiver are one transceiver.
  • 16. The external remote control of claim 13, further comprising a display configured to display patient information.
  • 17. The external remote control of claim 13, wherein the input is a user interface.
  • 18. The external remote control of claim 13, further comprising an energy transmitter configured to supply power to the bone growth device.
US Referenced Citations (527)
Number Name Date Kind
2702031 Wenger Feb 1955 A
3111945 Von Solbrig Nov 1963 A
3372476 Peiffer Mar 1968 A
3377576 Langberg Apr 1968 A
3512901 Law May 1970 A
3597781 Eibes Aug 1971 A
3900025 Barnes, Jr. Aug 1975 A
3915151 Kraus Oct 1975 A
RE28907 Eibes et al. Jul 1976 E
3976060 Hildebrandt et al. Aug 1976 A
4010758 Rockland et al. Mar 1977 A
4056743 Clifford et al. Nov 1977 A
4068821 Morrison Jan 1978 A
4078559 Nissinen Mar 1978 A
4204541 Kapitanov May 1980 A
4357946 Dutcher et al. Nov 1982 A
4386603 Mayfield Jun 1983 A
4448191 Rodnyansky et al. May 1984 A
4486176 Tardieu et al. Dec 1984 A
4501266 McDaniel Feb 1985 A
4522501 Shannon Jun 1985 A
4537520 Ochiai et al. Aug 1985 A
4550279 Klein Oct 1985 A
4561798 Elcrin et al. Dec 1985 A
4573454 Hoffman Mar 1986 A
4592355 Antebi Jun 1986 A
4595007 Mericle Jun 1986 A
4642257 Chase Feb 1987 A
4658809 Ulrich et al. Apr 1987 A
4700091 Wuthrich Oct 1987 A
4747832 Buffet May 1988 A
4854304 Zielke Aug 1989 A
4904861 Epstein et al. Feb 1990 A
4931055 Bumpus et al. Jun 1990 A
4940467 Tronzo Jul 1990 A
4957495 Kluger Sep 1990 A
4973331 Pursley et al. Nov 1990 A
5010879 Moriya et al. Apr 1991 A
5030235 Campbell, Jr. Jul 1991 A
5041112 Mingozzi et al. Aug 1991 A
5064004 Lundell Nov 1991 A
5074882 Grammont et al. Dec 1991 A
5092889 Campbell, Jr. Mar 1992 A
5133716 Plaza Jul 1992 A
5142407 Varaprasad et al. Aug 1992 A
5156605 Pursley et al. Oct 1992 A
5263955 Baumgart et al. Nov 1993 A
5290289 Sanders et al. Mar 1994 A
5306275 Bryan Apr 1994 A
5330503 Yoon Jul 1994 A
5334202 Carter Aug 1994 A
5336223 Rogers Aug 1994 A
5356411 Spievack Oct 1994 A
5356424 Buzerak et al. Oct 1994 A
5364396 Robinson et al. Nov 1994 A
5403322 Herzenberg et al. Apr 1995 A
5429638 Muschler et al. Jul 1995 A
5437266 McPherson et al. Aug 1995 A
5466261 Richelsoph Nov 1995 A
5468030 Walling Nov 1995 A
5480437 Draenert Jan 1996 A
5509888 Miller Apr 1996 A
5516335 Kummer et al. May 1996 A
5527309 Shelton Jun 1996 A
5536269 Spievack Jul 1996 A
5549610 Russell et al. Aug 1996 A
5573012 McEwan Nov 1996 A
5575790 Chen et al. Nov 1996 A
5582616 Bolduc et al. Dec 1996 A
5620445 Brosnahan et al. Apr 1997 A
5620449 Faccioli et al. Apr 1997 A
5626579 Muschler et al. May 1997 A
5626613 Schmieding May 1997 A
5632744 Campbell, Jr. May 1997 A
5659217 Petersen Aug 1997 A
5662683 Kay Sep 1997 A
5672175 Martin Sep 1997 A
5672177 Seldin Sep 1997 A
5700263 Schendel Dec 1997 A
5704938 Staehlin et al. Jan 1998 A
5704939 Justin Jan 1998 A
5720746 Soubeiran Feb 1998 A
5743910 Bays et al. Apr 1998 A
5762599 Sohn Jun 1998 A
5771903 Jakobsson Jun 1998 A
5810815 Morales Sep 1998 A
5827286 Incavo et al. Oct 1998 A
5830221 Stein et al. Nov 1998 A
5879375 Larson, Jr. et al. Mar 1999 A
5902304 Walker et al. May 1999 A
5935127 Border Aug 1999 A
5945762 Chen et al. Aug 1999 A
5961553 Coty et al. Oct 1999 A
5976138 Baumgart et al. Nov 1999 A
5979456 Magovern Nov 1999 A
6022349 McLeod et al. Feb 2000 A
6033412 Losken et al. Mar 2000 A
6034296 Elvin et al. Mar 2000 A
6102922 Jakobsson et al. Aug 2000 A
6106525 Sachse Aug 2000 A
6126660 Dietz Oct 2000 A
6126661 Faccioli et al. Oct 2000 A
6138681 Chen et al. Oct 2000 A
6139316 Sachdeva et al. Oct 2000 A
6162223 Orsak et al. Dec 2000 A
6183476 Gerhardt et al. Feb 2001 B1
6200317 Aalsma et al. Mar 2001 B1
6234956 He et al. May 2001 B1
6241730 Alby Jun 2001 B1
6245075 Betz et al. Jun 2001 B1
6315784 Djurovic Nov 2001 B1
6319255 Grundei et al. Nov 2001 B1
6331744 Chen et al. Dec 2001 B1
6336929 Justin Jan 2002 B1
6343568 McClasky Feb 2002 B1
6358283 Hogfors et al. Mar 2002 B1
6375682 Fleischmann et al. Apr 2002 B1
6389187 Greenaway et al. May 2002 B1
6400980 Lemelson Jun 2002 B1
6402753 Cole et al. Jun 2002 B1
6409175 Evans et al. Jun 2002 B1
6416516 Stauch et al. Jul 2002 B1
6499907 Baur Dec 2002 B1
6500110 Davey et al. Dec 2002 B1
6508820 Bales Jan 2003 B2
6510345 Van Bentem Jan 2003 B1
6537196 Creighton, IV et al. Mar 2003 B1
6554831 Rivard et al. Apr 2003 B1
6565573 Ferrante et al. May 2003 B1
6565576 Stauch et al. May 2003 B1
6582313 Perrow Jun 2003 B2
6583630 Mendes et al. Jun 2003 B2
6616669 Ogilvie et al. Sep 2003 B2
6626917 Craig Sep 2003 B1
6656135 Zogbi et al. Dec 2003 B2
6656194 Gannoe et al. Dec 2003 B1
6667725 Simons et al. Dec 2003 B1
6673079 Kane Jan 2004 B1
6702816 Buhler Mar 2004 B2
6706042 Taylor Mar 2004 B2
6709293 Mori et al. Mar 2004 B2
6730087 Butsch May 2004 B1
6761503 Breese Jul 2004 B2
6769499 Cargill et al. Aug 2004 B2
6789442 Forch Sep 2004 B2
6796984 Soubeiran Sep 2004 B2
6802844 Ferree Oct 2004 B2
6809434 Duncan et al. Oct 2004 B1
6835207 Zacouto et al. Dec 2004 B2
6852113 Nathanson et al. Feb 2005 B2
6918838 Schwarzler et al. Jul 2005 B2
6918910 Smith et al. Jul 2005 B2
6921400 Sohngen Jul 2005 B2
6923951 Contag et al. Aug 2005 B2
6971143 Domroese Dec 2005 B2
7001346 White Feb 2006 B2
7008425 Phillips Mar 2006 B2
7011658 Young Mar 2006 B2
7029472 Fortin Apr 2006 B1
7029475 Panjabi Apr 2006 B2
7041105 Michelson May 2006 B2
7060080 Bachmann Jun 2006 B2
7063706 Wittenstein Jun 2006 B2
7105029 Doubler et al. Sep 2006 B2
7105968 Nissen Sep 2006 B2
7114501 Johnson et al. Oct 2006 B2
7115129 Heggeness Oct 2006 B2
7135022 Kosashvili et al. Nov 2006 B2
7160312 Saadat Jan 2007 B2
7163538 Altarac et al. Jan 2007 B2
7189005 Ward Mar 2007 B2
7191007 Desai et al. Mar 2007 B2
7218232 DiSilvestro et al. May 2007 B2
7238191 Bachmann Jul 2007 B2
7241300 Sharkawy et al. Jul 2007 B2
7243719 Baron et al. Jul 2007 B2
7255682 Bartol, Jr. et al. Aug 2007 B1
7282023 Frering Oct 2007 B2
7285087 Moaddeb et al. Oct 2007 B2
7302015 Kim et al. Nov 2007 B2
7302858 Walsh et al. Dec 2007 B2
7314443 Jordan et al. Jan 2008 B2
7333013 Berger Feb 2008 B2
7357037 Hnat et al. Apr 2008 B2
7357635 Belfor et al. Apr 2008 B2
7360542 Nelson et al. Apr 2008 B2
7390007 Helms et al. Jun 2008 B2
7390294 Hassler, Jr. Jun 2008 B2
7402134 Moaddeb et al. Jul 2008 B2
7402176 Malek Jul 2008 B2
7429259 Cadeddu et al. Sep 2008 B2
7445010 Kugler et al. Nov 2008 B2
7458981 Fielding et al. Dec 2008 B2
7485149 White Feb 2009 B1
7489495 Stevenson Feb 2009 B2
7530981 Kutsenko May 2009 B2
7531002 Sutton et al. May 2009 B2
7553298 Hunt et al. Jun 2009 B2
7559951 DiSilvestro Jul 2009 B2
7561916 Hunt et al. Jul 2009 B2
7611526 Carl et al. Nov 2009 B2
7618435 Opolski Nov 2009 B2
7658754 Zhang et al. Feb 2010 B2
7666184 Stauch Feb 2010 B2
7666210 Franck et al. Feb 2010 B2
7678136 Doubler et al. Mar 2010 B2
7678139 Garamszegi et al. Mar 2010 B2
7708737 Kraft et al. May 2010 B2
7708762 McCarthy et al. May 2010 B2
7727143 Birk et al. Jun 2010 B2
7753913 Szakelyhidi, Jr. et al. Jul 2010 B2
7753915 Eksler et al. Jul 2010 B1
7762998 Birk et al. Jul 2010 B2
7763080 Southworth Jul 2010 B2
7766855 Miethke Aug 2010 B2
7775215 Hassler, Jr. et al. Aug 2010 B2
7776068 Ainsworth et al. Aug 2010 B2
7776075 Bruneau et al. Aug 2010 B2
7787958 Stevenson Aug 2010 B2
7794476 Wisnewski Sep 2010 B2
7811328 Molz, IV et al. Oct 2010 B2
7835779 Anderson et al. Nov 2010 B2
7837691 Cordes et al. Nov 2010 B2
7862586 Malek Jan 2011 B2
7867235 Fell et al. Jan 2011 B2
7875033 Richter et al. Jan 2011 B2
7901381 Birk et al. Mar 2011 B2
7909852 Boomer et al. Mar 2011 B2
7918844 Byrum et al. Apr 2011 B2
7938841 Sharkawy et al. May 2011 B2
7985256 Grotz et al. Jul 2011 B2
7988709 Clark et al. Aug 2011 B2
8002809 Baynham Aug 2011 B2
8011308 Picchio Sep 2011 B2
8034080 Malandain et al. Oct 2011 B2
8043299 Conway Oct 2011 B2
8043338 Dant Oct 2011 B2
8057473 Orsak et al. Nov 2011 B2
8057513 Kohm et al. Nov 2011 B2
8083741 Morgan et al. Dec 2011 B2
8092499 Roth Jan 2012 B1
8095317 Ekseth et al. Jan 2012 B2
8105360 Connor Jan 2012 B1
8114158 Carl et al. Feb 2012 B2
8123805 Makower et al. Feb 2012 B2
8133280 Voellmicke et al. Mar 2012 B2
8147549 Metcalf, Jr. et al. Apr 2012 B2
8162897 Byrum Apr 2012 B2
8162979 Sachs et al. Apr 2012 B2
8177789 Magill et al. May 2012 B2
8197490 Pool et al. Jun 2012 B2
8211149 Justis Jul 2012 B2
8211151 Schwab et al. Jul 2012 B2
8221420 Keller Jul 2012 B2
8226690 Altarac et al. Jul 2012 B2
8236002 Fortin et al. Aug 2012 B2
8241331 Arnin Aug 2012 B2
8246630 Manzi et al. Aug 2012 B2
8252063 Stauch Aug 2012 B2
8267969 Altarac et al. Sep 2012 B2
8278941 Kroh et al. Oct 2012 B2
8282671 Connor Oct 2012 B2
8323290 Metzger et al. Dec 2012 B2
8357182 Seme Jan 2013 B2
8366628 Denker et al. Feb 2013 B2
8372078 Collazo Feb 2013 B2
8386018 Stauch et al. Feb 2013 B2
8394124 Biyani Mar 2013 B2
8403958 Schwab Mar 2013 B2
8414584 Brigido Apr 2013 B2
8425608 Dewey et al. Apr 2013 B2
8435268 Thompson et al. May 2013 B2
8439926 Bojarski et al. May 2013 B2
8444693 Reiley May 2013 B2
8469908 Asfora Jun 2013 B2
8470004 Reiley Jun 2013 B2
8486070 Morgan Jul 2013 B2
8486076 Chavarria et al. Jul 2013 B2
8486147 De Villiers et al. Jul 2013 B2
8494805 Roche et al. Jul 2013 B2
8496662 Novak et al. Jul 2013 B2
8518062 Cole et al. Aug 2013 B2
8523866 Sidebotham et al. Sep 2013 B2
8529474 Gupta et al. Sep 2013 B2
8529606 Alamin et al. Sep 2013 B2
8529607 Alamin et al. Sep 2013 B2
8556901 Anthony et al. Oct 2013 B2
8556911 Mehta et al. Oct 2013 B2
8556975 Ciupik et al. Oct 2013 B2
8562653 Alamin et al. Oct 2013 B2
8568457 Hunziker Oct 2013 B2
8617220 Skaggs Oct 2013 B2
8579979 Edie et al. Nov 2013 B2
8585595 Heilman Nov 2013 B2
8585740 Ross et al. Nov 2013 B1
8591549 Lange Nov 2013 B2
8591553 Eisermann et al. Nov 2013 B2
8613758 Linares Dec 2013 B2
8623036 Harrison et al. Jan 2014 B2
8632544 Haaja et al. Jan 2014 B2
8632548 Soubeiran Jan 2014 B2
8632563 Nagase et al. Jan 2014 B2
8636771 Butler et al. Jan 2014 B2
8636802 Serhan et al. Jan 2014 B2
8641719 Gephart et al. Feb 2014 B2
8641723 Connor Feb 2014 B2
8657856 Gephart et al. Feb 2014 B2
8663285 Dall et al. Mar 2014 B2
8663287 Butler et al. Mar 2014 B2
8668719 Alamin et al. Mar 2014 B2
8709090 Makower et al. Apr 2014 B2
8758347 Weiner et al. Jun 2014 B2
8758355 Fisher et al. Jun 2014 B2
8771272 LeCronier et al. Jul 2014 B2
8777947 Zahrly et al. Jul 2014 B2
8777995 McClintock et al. Jul 2014 B2
8790343 McClellan et al. Jul 2014 B2
8790409 Van den Heuvel et al. Jul 2014 B2
8828058 Elsebaie et al. Sep 2014 B2
8828087 Stone et al. Sep 2014 B2
8840651 Reiley Sep 2014 B2
8870881 Rezach et al. Oct 2014 B2
8870959 Arnin Oct 2014 B2
8915915 Harrison et al. Dec 2014 B2
8915917 Doherty et al. Dec 2014 B2
8920422 Homeier et al. Dec 2014 B2
8945188 Rezach et al. Feb 2015 B2
8961521 Keefer et al. Feb 2015 B2
8961567 Hunziker Feb 2015 B2
8968402 Myers et al. Mar 2015 B2
8992527 Guichet Mar 2015 B2
9022917 Kasic et al. May 2015 B2
9044218 Young Jun 2015 B2
9060810 Kercher et al. Jun 2015 B2
9078703 Arnin Jul 2015 B2
9445720 Janna Sep 2016 B2
9883896 Kim et al. Feb 2018 B2
10314619 Roschak Jun 2019 B2
10702375 Roholt Jul 2020 B2
20020050112 Koch et al. May 2002 A1
20020072758 Reo et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020164905 Bryant Nov 2002 A1
20030040671 Somogyi et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030144669 Robinson Jul 2003 A1
20030220643 Ferree Nov 2003 A1
20030220644 Thelen et al. Nov 2003 A1
20040011137 Hnat et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040011365 Govari et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040019353 Freid et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040023623 Stauch et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040055610 Forsell Mar 2004 A1
20040133219 Forsell Jul 2004 A1
20040138725 Forsell Jul 2004 A1
20040193266 Meyer Sep 2004 A1
20050034705 McClendon Feb 2005 A1
20050049617 Chatlynne et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050065529 Liu et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050090823 Bartimus Apr 2005 A1
20050159754 Odrich Jul 2005 A1
20050234448 McCarthy Oct 2005 A1
20050234462 Hershberger Oct 2005 A1
20050246034 Soubeiran Nov 2005 A1
20050261779 Meyer Nov 2005 A1
20050272976 Tanaka et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060004459 Hazebrouck et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060009767 Kiester Jan 2006 A1
20060036259 Carl et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060036323 Carl et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060036324 Sachs et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060047282 Gordon Mar 2006 A1
20060058792 Hynes Mar 2006 A1
20060069447 DiSilvestro et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060074448 Harrison et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060079897 Harrison et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060136062 DiNello et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060142767 Green et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060155279 Ogilvie Jul 2006 A1
20060195087 Sacher et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060195088 Sacher et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060200134 Freid et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060204156 Takehara et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060235299 Martinelli Oct 2006 A1
20060235424 Vitale et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060241746 Shaoulian et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060241767 Doty Oct 2006 A1
20060249914 Dulin Nov 2006 A1
20060271107 Harrison et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060282073 Simanovsky Dec 2006 A1
20060293683 Stauch Dec 2006 A1
20070010814 Stauch Jan 2007 A1
20070010887 Williams et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070021644 Woolson et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070031131 Griffitts Feb 2007 A1
20070043376 Leatherbury et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070050030 Kim Mar 2007 A1
20070118215 Moaddeb May 2007 A1
20070161984 Cresina et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070173837 Chan et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070179493 Kim Aug 2007 A1
20070185374 Kick et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070233098 Mastrorio et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070239159 Altarac et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070239161 Giger et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070255088 Jacobson et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070270803 Giger et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070276368 Trieu et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070276369 Allard et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070276373 Malandain Nov 2007 A1
20070276378 Harrison et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070276493 Malandain et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070288024 Gollogly Dec 2007 A1
20070288183 Bulkes et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080009792 Henniges et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080015577 Loeb Jan 2008 A1
20080021454 Chao et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080021455 Chao et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080021456 Gupta et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080027436 Cournoyer et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080033431 Jung et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080033436 Song et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080051784 Gollogly Feb 2008 A1
20080082118 Edidin et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080086128 Lewis Apr 2008 A1
20080097487 Pool et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080097496 Chang et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080108995 Conway et al. May 2008 A1
20080161933 Grotz et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080167685 Allard et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080172063 Taylor Jul 2008 A1
20080177319 Schwab Jul 2008 A1
20080177326 Thompson Jul 2008 A1
20080190237 Radinger et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080228186 Gall et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080255615 Vittur et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080272928 Shuster Nov 2008 A1
20080275557 Makower et al. Nov 2008 A1
20090030462 Buttermann Jan 2009 A1
20090076597 Dahlgren et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090082815 Zylber et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090088803 Justis et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090093820 Trieu et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090093890 Gelbart Apr 2009 A1
20090112263 Pool et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090163780 Tieu Jun 2009 A1
20090171356 Klett Jul 2009 A1
20090192514 Feinberg et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090198144 Phillips et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090216113 Meier et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090275984 Kim et al. Nov 2009 A1
20100004654 Schmitz et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100057127 McGuire et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100094306 Chang et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100100185 Trieu et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100106192 Barry Apr 2010 A1
20100114322 Clifford et al. May 2010 A1
20100130941 Conlon et al. May 2010 A1
20100137872 Kam et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100145449 Makower et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100145462 Ainsworth et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100168751 Anderson et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100249782 Durham Sep 2010 A1
20100256626 Muller et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100262239 Boyden et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100318129 Seme et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100331883 Schmitz et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110004076 Janna et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110057756 Marinescu et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110066188 Seme et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110098748 Jangra Apr 2011 A1
20110152725 Demir et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110196435 Forsell Aug 2011 A1
20110202138 Shenoy et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110238126 Soubeiran Sep 2011 A1
20110257655 Copf, Jr. Oct 2011 A1
20110284014 Cadeddu et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110319755 Stein Dec 2011 A1
20120019341 Gabay et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120019342 Gabay et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120053633 Stauch Mar 2012 A1
20120088953 King Apr 2012 A1
20120109207 Trieu May 2012 A1
20120116535 Ratron et al. May 2012 A1
20120158061 Koch et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120172883 Sayago Jul 2012 A1
20120179215 Soubeiran Jul 2012 A1
20120221106 Makower et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120271353 Barry Oct 2012 A1
20120296234 Wilhelm et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120329882 Messersmith et al. Dec 2012 A1
20130013066 Landry et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130072932 Stauch Mar 2013 A1
20130123847 Anderson et al. May 2013 A1
20130138017 Jundt et al. May 2013 A1
20130138154 Reiley May 2013 A1
20130150863 Baumgartner Jun 2013 A1
20130150889 Fening et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130178903 Abdou Jul 2013 A1
20130211521 Shenoy et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130245692 Hayes et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130253344 Griswold et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130253587 Carls et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130261672 Horvath Oct 2013 A1
20130296863 Globerman et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130296864 Burley et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130296940 Northcutt et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130325006 Michelinie et al. Dec 2013 A1
20130325071 Niemiec et al. Dec 2013 A1
20140005788 Haaja et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140025172 Lucas et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140052134 Orisek Feb 2014 A1
20140058392 Mueckter et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140058450 Arlet Feb 2014 A1
20140066987 Hestad et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140088715 Ciupik Mar 2014 A1
20140128920 Kantelhardt May 2014 A1
20140163664 Goldsmith Jun 2014 A1
20140236234 Kroll et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140236311 Vicatos et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140257412 Patty et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140277446 Clifford et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140296918 Fening et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140303538 Baym et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140303539 Baym et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140358150 Kaufman et al. Dec 2014 A1
20150025587 Kim et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150105782 D'Lima et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150105824 Moskowitz et al. Apr 2015 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (28)
Number Date Country
1697630 Nov 2005 CN
101040807 Sep 2007 CN
1541262 Jun 1969 DE
8515687 Dec 1985 DE
19626230 Jan 1998 DE
19745654 Apr 1999 DE
102005045070 Apr 2007 DE
0663184 Jul 1995 EP
1905388 Apr 2008 EP
2901991 Dec 2007 FR
2900563 Aug 2008 FR
2892617 Sep 2008 FR
2916622 Sep 2009 FR
2961386 Jul 2012 FR
H0956736 Mar 1997 JP
2002500063 Jan 2002 JP
WO1998044858 Jan 2002 WO
WO1999051160 Jan 2002 WO
WO2001024697 Jan 2002 WO
WO2001045485 Jan 2002 WO
WO2001045487 Jan 2002 WO
WO2001067973 Jan 2002 WO
WO2001078614 Jan 2002 WO
WO2007015239 Jan 2008 WO
WO2007013059 Apr 2009 WO
WO2011116158 Jan 2012 WO
WO2013119528 Aug 2013 WO
WO2014040013 Mar 2014 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (103)
Entry
International Search Report and Written Opinion for application serial No. PCT/US2015/057010 dated Jan. 8, 2016.
Abe et al., “Experimental external fixation combined with percutaneous discectomy in the management of scoliosis.”, Spine, 1999, pp. 646-653, 24, No. 7.
Ahlbom et al., “Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz). International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection.”, Health Physics, 1998, pp. 494-522, 74, No. 4.
Amer et al., “Evaluation of treatment of late-onset tibia vara using gradual angulation translation high tibial osteotomy”, ACTA Orthopaedica Belgica, 2010, pp. 360-366, 76, No. 3.
Angrisani et al., “Lap-Band® Rapid Port™ System: Preliminary results in 21 patients”, Obesity Surgery, 2005, p. 936, 15, No. 7.
Baumgart et al., “A fully implantable, programmable distraction nail (Fitbone)—new perspectives for corrective and reconstructive limb surgery.”, Practice of Intramedullary Locked Nails, 2006, pp. 189-198.
Baumgart et al., “The bioexpandable prosthesis: A new perspective after resection of malignant bone tumors in children.”, J Pediatr Hematol Oncol, 2005, pp. 452-455, 27, No. 8.
Bodó et al., “Development of a tension-adjustable implant for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.”, Eklem Hastaliklari ve Cerrahisi—Joint Diseases and Related Surgery, 2008, pp. 27-32, 19, No. 1.
Boudjemline et al., “Off-label use of an adjustable gastric banding system for pulmonary artery banding.”, The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2006, pp. 1130-1135, 131, No. 5.
Brown et al., “Single port surgery and the Dundee Endocone.”, SAGES Annual Scientific Sessions: Emerging Technology Poster Abstracts, 2007, ETP007, pp. 323-324.
Buchowski et al., “Temporary internal distraction as an aid to correction of severe scoliosis”, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2006, pp. 2035-2041, 88-A, No. 9.
Burghardt et al., “Mechanical failure of the Intramedullary Skeletal Kinetic Distractor in limb lengthening.”, J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2011, pp. 639-643, 93-B, No. 5.
Burke, “Design of a minimally invasive non fusion device for the surgical management of scoliosis in the skeletally immature”, Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 2006, pp. 378-384, 123.
Carter et al., “A cumulative damage model for bone fracture.”, Journal of Orthopaedic Research, 1985, pp. 84-90, 3, No. 1.
Chapman et al., “Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding in the treatment of obesity: A systematic literature review.”, Surgery, 2004, pp. 326-351, 135, No. 3.
Cole et al., “Operative technique intramedullary skeletal kinetic distractor: Tibial surgical technique.”, Orthofix, 2005.
Cole et al., “The intramedullary skeletal kinetic distractor (ISKD): first clinical results of a new intramedullary nail for lengthening of the femur and tibia.”, Injury, 2001, pp. S-D-129-S-D-139, 32.
Dailey et al., “A novel intramedullary nail for micromotion stimulation of tibial fractures.”, Clinical Biomechanics, 2012, pp. 182-188, 27, No. 2.
Daniels et al., “A new method for continuous intraoperative measurement of Harrington rod loading patterns.”, Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 1984, pp. 233-246, 12, No. 3.
De Giorgi et al., “Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation for the treatment of severe scoliosis.”, European Spine Journal, 1999, pp. 8-15, No. 1.
Dorsey et al., “The stability of three commercially available implants used in medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy.”, Journal of Knee Surgery, 2006, pp. 95-98, 19, No. 2.
Edeland et al., “Instrumentation for distraction by limited surgery in scoliosis treatment.”, Journal of Biomedical Engineering, 1981, pp. 143-146, 3, No. 2.
Elsebaie, “Single growing rods (Review of 21 cases). Changing the foundations: Does it affect the results?”, Journal of Child Orthop, 2007, 1:258.
Ember et al., “Distraction forces required during growth rod lengthening.”, J of Bone Joint Surg BR, 2006, p. 229, 88-B, No. Suppl. II.
European Patent Office, “Observations by a third party under Article 115 EPC in EP08805612 by Soubeiran.”, 2010.
Fabry et al., “A technique for prevention of port complications after laparoscopic adjustable silicone gastric banding.”, Obesity Surgery, 2002, pp. 285-288, 12, No. 2.
Fried et al., “In vivo measurements of different gastric band pressures towards the gastric wall at the stoma region.”, Obesity Surgery, 2004, p. 914, 14, No. 7.
Gao et al., CHD7 gene polymorphisms are associated with susceptibility to idiopathic scoliosis, American Journal of Human Genetics, 2007, pp. 957-965, 80.
Gebhart et al., “Early clinical experience with a custom made growing endoprosthesis in children with malignant bone tumors of the lower extremity actioned by an external permanent magnet; The Phenix M. system”, International Society of Limb Salvage 14th International Symposium on Limb Salvage. Sep. 3, 2007, Hamburg, Germany. (2 pages).
Gillespie et al. “Harrington instrumentation without fusion.”, J Bone Joint Surg Br, 1981, p. 461, 63-B, No. 3.
Goodship et al., “Strain rate and timing of stimulation in mechanical modulation of fracture healing.”, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1998, pp. S105-S115, No. 355S.
Grass et al., “Intermittent distracting rod for correction of high neurologic risk congenital scoliosis.”, Spine, 1997, pp. 1922-1927, 22, No. 16.
Gray, “Gray's anatomy of the human body.”, http://education.yahoo.com/reference/gray/subjects/subject/128, published Jul. 1, 2007.
Grimer et al. “Non-invasive extendable endoprostheses for children—Expensive but worth it!”, International Society of Limb Salvage 14th International Symposium on Limb Salvage, 2007.
Grünert, “The development of a totally implantable electronic sphincter.” (translated from the German “Die Entwicklung eines total implantierbaren elektronischen Sphincters”), Langenbecks Archiv fur Chirurgie, 1969, pp. 1170-1174, 325.
Guichet et al. “Gradual femoral lengthening with the Albizzia intramedullary nail”, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2003, pp. 838-848, 85-A, No. 5.
Gupta et al., “Non-invasive distal femoral expandable endoprosthesis for limb-salvage surgery in paediatric tumours.”, J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2006, pp. 649-654, 88-B, No. 5.
Hankemeier et al., “Limb lengthening with the Intramedullary Skeletal Kinetic Distractor (ISKD).”, Oper Orthop Traumatol, 2005, pp. 79-101, 17, No. 1.
Harbach et al., “First experiences with the routine use of the Rapid Port™ system with the Lap-Band®.”, Obesity Surgery, 2006, p. 418, 16, No. 4.
Harrington, “Treatment of scoliosis. Correction and internal fixation by spine instrumentation.”, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1962, pp. 591-610, 44-A, No. 4.
Hennig et al., “The safety and efficacy of a new adjustable plate used for proximal tibial opening wedge osteotomy in the treatment of unicompartmental knee osteoarthrosis.”, Journal of Knee Surgery, 2007, pp. 6-14, 20, No. 1.
Hoffmeister et al., “Callus distraction with the Albizzia nail.”, Practice of Intramedullary Locked Nails, 2006, pp. 211-215.
Hyodo et al., “Bone transport using intramedullary fixation and a single flexible traction cable.”, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1996, pp. 256-268, 325.
International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection, “Guidelines on limits of exposure to static magnetic fields.” Health Physics, 2009, pp. 504-514, 96, No. 4.
INVIS®/Lamello Catalog, 2006, Article No. 68906A001 GB.
Kasliwal et al., “Management of high-grade spondylolisthesis.”, Neurosurgery Clinics of North America, 2013, pp. 275-291, 24, No. 2.
Kenawey et al., “Leg lengthening using intramedullay skeletal kinetic distractor: Results of 57 consecutive applications.”, Injury, 2011, pp. 150-155, 42, No. 2.
Kent et al., “Assessment and correction of femoral malrotation following intramedullary nailing of the femur.”, Acta Orthop Belg, 2010, pp. 580-584, 76, No. 5.
Klemme et al., “Spinal instrumentation without fusion for progressive scoliosis in young children”, Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics. 1997, pp. 734-742, 17, No. 6.
Korenkov et al., “Port function after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding for morbid obesity.”, Surgical Endoscopy, 2003, pp. 1068-1071, 17, No. 7.
Krieg et al., “Leg lengthening with a motorized nail in adolescents.”, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2008, pp. 189-197, 466, No. 1.
Kucukkaya et al., “The new intramedullary cable bone transport technique.”, Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 2009, pp. 531-536, 23, No. 7.
Lechner et al., “In vivo band manometry: A new method in band adjustment”, Obesity Surgery, 2005, p. 935, 15, No. 7.
Lechner et al., “Intra-band manometry for band adjustments: The basics”, Obesity Surgery, 2006, pp. 417-418, 16, No. 4.
Li et al., “Bone transport over an intramedullary nail: A case report with histologic examination of the regenerated segment.”, Injury, 1999, pp. 525-534, 30, No. 8.
Lonner, “Emerging minimally invasive technologies for the management of scoliosis.”, Orthopedic Clinics of North America, 2007, pp. 431-440, 38, No. 3.
Matthews et al., “Magnetically adjustable intraocular lens.”, Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, 2003, pp. 2211-2216, 29, No. 11.
Micromotion, “Micro Drive Engineering⋅General catalogue.”, 2009, pp. 14-24.
Mineiro et al., “Subcutaneous rodding for progressive spinal curvatures: Early results.”, Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics, 2002, pp. 290-295, 22, No. 3.
Moe et al., “Harrington instrumentation without fusion plus external orthotic support for the treatment of difficult curvature problems in young children.”, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1984, pp. 35-45, 185.
Montague et al., “Magnetic gear dynamics for servo control.”, Melecon 2010—2010 15th IEEE Mediterranean Electrotechnical Conference, Valletta, 2010, pp. 1192-1197.
Montague et al., “Servo control of magnetic gears.”, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 2012, pp. 269-278, 17, No. 2.
Nachemson et al., “Intravital wireless telemetry of axial forces in Harrington distraction rods in patients with idiopathic scoliosis.”, The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1971, pp. 445-465, 53, No. 3.
Nachlas et al., “The cure of experimental scoliosis by directed growth control.”, The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1951, pp. 24-34, 33-A, No. 1.
Newton et al., “Fusionless scoliosis correction by anterolateral tethering . . . can it work?.”, 39th Annual Scoliosis Research Society Meeting, 2004.
Oh et al., “Bone transport over an intramedullary nail for reconstruction of long bone defects in tibia.”, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2008, pp. 801-808, 128, No. 8.
Ozcivici et al., “Mechanical signals as anabolic agents in bone.”, Nature Reviews Rheumatology, 2010, pp. 50-59, 6, No. 1.
Piorkowski et al., Preventing Port Site Inversion in Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding, Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases, 2007, 3(2), pp. 159-162, Elsevier; New York, U.S.A.
Prontes, “Longest bone in body.”, eHow.com, 2012.
Rathjen et al., “Clinical and radiographic results after implant removal in idiopathic scoliosis.”, Spine, 2007, pp. 2184-2188, 32, No. 20.
Ren et al., “Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: Surgical technique”, Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques, 2003, pp. 257-263, 13, No. 4.
Reyes-Sanchez et al., “External fixation for dynamic correction of severe scoliosis”, The Spine Journal, 2005, pp. 418-426, 5, No. 4.
Rinsky et al., “Segmental instrumentation without fusion in children with progressive scoliosis.”, Journal of Pediatric Orthopedics, 1985, pp. 687-690, 5, No. 6.
Rode et al., “A simple way to adjust bands under radiologic control”, Obesity Surgery, 2006, p. 418, 16, No. 4.
Schmerling et al., “Using the shape recovery of nitinol in the Harrington rod treatment of scoliosis.”, Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, 1976, pp. 879-892, 10, No. 6.
Scott et al., “Transgastric, transcolonic and transvaginal cholecystectomy using magnetically anchored instruments.”, SAGES Annual Scientific Sessions, Poster Abstracts, Apr. 18-22, 2007, P511, p. 306.
Sharke, “The machinery of life”, Mechanical Engineering Magazine, Feb. 2004, Printed from Internet site Oct. 24, 2007 http://www.memagazine.org/contents/current/features/moflife/moflife.html.
Shiha et al., “Ilizarov gradual correction of genu varum deformity in adults.”, Acta Orthop Belg, 2009, pp. 784-791, 75, No. 6.
Simpson et al., “Femoral lengthening with the intramedullary skeletal kinetic distractor.”, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 2009, pp. 955-961, 91-B, No. 7.
Smith, “The use of growth-sparing instrumentation in pediatric spinal deformity.”, Orthopedic Clinics of North America, 2007, pp. 547-552, 38, No. 4.
Soubeiran et al. “The Phenix M System, a fully implanted non-invasive lengthening device externally controllable through the skin with a palm size permanent magnet. Applications in limb salvage.” International Society of Limb Salvage 14th International Symposium on Limb Salvage, Sep. 13, 2007, Hamburg, Germany. (2 pages).
Soubeiran et al., “The Phenix M System. A fully implanted lengthening device externally controllable through the skin with a palm size permanent magnet; Applications to pediatric orthopaedics”, 6th European Research Conference in Pediatric Orthopaedics, Oct. 6, 2006, Toulouse, France (7 pages).
Stokes et al., “Reducing radiation exposure in early-onset scoliosis surgery patients: Novel use of ultrasonography to measure lengthening in magnetically-controlled growing rods. Prospective validation study and assessment of clinical algorithm”, 20th International Meeting on Advanced Spine Techniques, Jul. 11, 2013. Vancouver, Canada. Scoliosis Research Society.
Sun et al., “Masticatory mechanics of a mandibular distraction osteogenesis site: Interfragmentary micromovement.”, Bone, 2007, pp. 188-196, 41, No. 2.
Synthes Spine, “VEPTR II. Vertical Expandable Prosthetic Titanium Rib II: Technique Guide.”, 2008, 40 pgs.
Synthes Spine, “VEPTR Vertical Expandable Prosthetic Titanium Rib, Patient Guide.”, 2005, 23 pgs.
Takaso et al., “New remote-controlled growing-rod spinal instrumentation possibly applicable for scoliosis in young children.”, Journal of Orthopaedic Science, 1998, pp. 336-340, 3, No. 6.
Teli et al., “Measurement of forces generated during distraction of growing rods.”, Journal of Children's Orthopaedics, 2007, pp. 257-258, 1, No. 4.
Tello, “Harrington instrumentation without arthrodesis and consecutive distraction program for young children with severe spinal deformities: Experience and technical details.”, The Orthopedic Clinics of North America, 1994, pp. 333-351, 25, No. 2.
Thaller et al., “Limb lengthening with fully implantable magnetically actuated mechanical nails (PHENIX®)—Preliminary results.”, Injury, 2014 (E-published Oct. 28, 2013), pp. S60-S65, 45.
Thompson et al., “Early onset scoliosis: Future directions”, 2007, J Bone Joint Surg Am, pp. 163-166, 89-A, Suppl 1.
Thompson et al., “Growing rod techniques in early-onset scoliosis”, Journal of Pediatric Orthopedics, 2007, pp. 354-361, 27, No. 3.
Thonse et al., “Limb lengthening with a fully implantable, telescopic, intramedullary nail.”, Operative Techniques in Orthopedics, 2005, pp. 355-362, 15, No. 4.
Trias et al., “Dynamic loads experienced in correction of idiopathic scoliosis using two types of Harrington rods.”, Spine, 1979, pp. 228-235, 4, No. 3.
Verkerke et al., “An extendable modular endoprosthetic system for bone tumor management in the leg”, Journal of Biomedical Engineering, 1990, pp. 91-96, 12, No. 2.
Verkerke et al., “Design of a lengthening element for a modular femur endoprosthetic system”, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine, 1989, pp. 97-102, 203, No. 2.
Verkerke et al., “Development and test of an extendable endoprosthesis for bone reconstruction in the leg.”, The International Journal of Artificial Organs, 1994, pp. 155-162, 17, No. 3.
Weiner et al., “Initial clinical experience with telemetrically adjustable gastric banding”, Surgical Technology International, 2005, pp. 63-69, 15.
Wenger, “Spine jack operation in the correction of scoliotic deformity: A direct intrathoracic attack to straighten the laterally bent spine: Preliminary report”, Arch Surg, 1961, pp. 123-132 (901-910), 83, No. 6.
White, III et al., “The clinical biomechanics of scoliosis.”, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1976, pp. 100-112, 118.
Yonnet, “A new type of permanent magnet coupling.”, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 1981, pp. 2991-2993, 17, No. 6.
Yonnet, “Passive magnetic bearings with permanent magnets.”, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 1978, pp. 803-805, 14, No. 5.
Zheng et al., “Force and torque characteristics for magnetically driven blood pump.”, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 2002, pp. 292-302, 241, No. 2.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20190254712 A1 Aug 2019 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
62067937 Oct 2014 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 15521025 US
Child 16398705 US