Embodiments of the present invention relate generally to remotely controlled apparatus for use in a subterranean borehole and, more particularly, in some embodiments to an expandable reamer apparatus for enlarging a subterranean borehole, to an expandable stabilizer apparatus for stabilizing a bottom hole assembly during a drilling operation, in other embodiments to other apparatus for use in a subterranean borehole, and in still other embodiments to an actuation device and system.
Wellbores, also called boreholes, for hydrocarbon (oil and gas) production, as well as for other purposes, such as, for example, geothermal energy production, are drilled with a drill string that includes a tubular member (also referred to as a drilling tubular) having a drilling assembly (also referred to as the drilling assembly or bottom hole assembly or “BHA”) which includes a drill bit attached to the bottom end thereof. The drill bit is rotated to shear or disintegrate material of the rock formation to drill the wellbore. The drill string often includes tools or other devices that need to be remotely activated and deactivated during drilling operations. Such tools and devices include, among other things, reamers, stabilizers or force application members used for steering the drill bit, Production wells include devices, such as valves, inflow control device, etc., that are remotely controlled. The disclosure herein provides a novel apparatus for controlling such and other downhole tools or devices.
Expandable tools are typically employed in downhole operations in drilling oil, gas and geothermal wells. For example, expandable reamers are typically employed for enlarging a subterranean borehole. Conventionally in drilling oil, gas, and geothermal wells, a casing string (such term broadly including a liner string) is installed and cemented to prevent the wellbore walls from caving into the subterranean borehole while providing requisite shoring for subsequent drilling operations to achieve greater depths. Casing is also conventionally installed to isolate different formations, to prevent crossflow of formation fluids, and to enable control of formation fluids and pressure as the borehole is drilled. To increase the depth of a previously drilled borehole, new casing is laid within and extended below the previous casing. While adding additional casing allows a borehole to reach greater depths, it has the disadvantage of narrowing the borehole. Narrowing the borehole restricts the diameter of any subsequent sections of the well because the drill bit and any further casing must pass through the existing casing. As reductions in the borehole diameter are undesirable because they limit the production flow rate of oil and gas through the borehole, it is often desirable to enlarge a subterranean borehole to provide a larger borehole diameter for installing additional casing beyond previously installed casing as well as to enable better production flow rates of hydrocarbons through the borehole.
A variety of approaches have been employed for enlarging a borehole diameter. One conventional approach used to enlarge a subterranean borehole includes using eccentric and bi-center bits. For example, an eccentric bit with a laterally extended or enlarged cutting portion is rotated about its axis to produce an enlarged borehole diameter. A bi-center bit assembly employs two longitudinally superimposed bit sections with laterally offset longitudinal axes, which when the bit is rotated produce an enlarged borehole diameter.
Another conventional approach used to enlarge a subterranean borehole includes employing an extended bottom hole assembly with a pilot drill bit at the distal end thereof and a reamer assembly some distance above. This arrangement permits the use of any standard rotary drill bit type, be it a rock bit or a drag bit, as the pilot bit, and the extended nature of the assembly permits greater flexibility when passing through tight spots in the borehole as well as the opportunity to effectively stabilize the pilot drill bit so that the pilot hole and the following reamer will traverse the path intended for the borehole. This aspect of an extended bottom hole assembly is particularly significant in directional drilling. One design to this end includes so-called “reamer wings,” which generally comprise a tubular body having a fishing neck with a threaded connection at the top thereof and a tong die surface at the bottom thereof, also with a threaded connection. The upper midportion of the reamer wing tool includes one or more longitudinally extending blades projecting generally radially outwardly from the tubular body, the outer edges of the blades carrying PDC cutting elements.
As mentioned above, conventional expandable reamers may be used to enlarge a subterranean borehole and may include blades pivotably or hingedly affixed to a tubular body and actuated by way of a piston disposed therein. In addition, a conventional borehole opener may be employed comprising a body equipped with at least two hole opening arms having cutting means that may be moved from a position of rest in the body to an active position by exposure to pressure of the drilling fluid flowing through the body. The blades in these reamers are initially retracted to permit the tool to be run through the borehole on a drill string and once the tool has passed beyond the end of the casing, the blades are extended so the bore diameter may be increased below the casing.
The blades of some conventional expandable reamers have been sized to minimize a clearance between themselves and the tubular body in order to prevent any drilling mud and earth fragments from becoming lodged in the clearance and binding the blade against the tubular body. The blades of these conventional expandable reamers utilize pressure from inside the tool to apply force radially outward against pistons which move the blades, carrying cutting elements, laterally outward. It is felt by some that the nature of some conventional reamers allows misaligned forces to cock and jam the pistons and blades, preventing the springs from retracting the blades laterally inward. Also, designs of some conventional expandable reamer assemblies fail to help blade retraction when jammed and pulled upward against the borehole casing. Furthermore, some conventional hydraulically actuated reamers utilize expensive seals disposed around a very complex shaped and expensive piston, or blade, carrying cutting elements. In order to prevent cocking, some conventional reamers are designed having the piston shaped oddly in order to try to avoid the supposed cocking, requiring matching, complex seal configurations. These seals are feared to possibly leak after extended usage.
Notwithstanding the various prior approaches to drill and/or ream a larger diameter borehole below a smaller diameter borehole, the need exists for improved apparatus and methods for doing so. For instance, bi-center and reamer wing assemblies are limited in the sense that the pass through diameter of such tools is nonadjustable and limited by the reaming diameter. Furthermore, conventional bi-center and eccentric bits may have the tendency to wobble and deviate from the path intended for the borehole. Conventional expandable reaming assemblies, while sometimes more stable than bi-center and eccentric bits, may be subject to damage when passing through a smaller diameter borehole or casing section, may be prematurely actuated, and may present difficulties in removal from the borehole after actuation.
Various embodiments of the present disclosure are directed to expandable apparatuses. In one or more embodiments, an expandable apparatus may comprise a tubular body comprising a fluid passageway extending through an inner bore. A push sleeve may be disposed within the inner bore of the tubular body and may be coupled to one or more expandable features. The push sleeve may comprise a lower surface in communication with a lower annular chamber. The push sleeve may be configured to move axially responsive to a flow of drilling fluid through the fluid passageway to extend and retract the one or more expandable features. A valve may be positioned within the tubular body and configured to selectively control the flow of a drilling fluid into the lower annular chamber.
In one or more additional embodiments, an expandable apparatus may comprise a tubular body and one or more expandable features. The one or more expandable features are configured to expand and retract an unlimited number of times. The expandable apparatus may be configured as an expandable reamer, an expandable stabilizer, or other expandable apparatus.
Additional embodiments of the disclosure are directed to methods of operating an expandable apparatus. One or more embodiments of such methods may comprise flowing a drilling fluid through a fluid passageway located in a tubular body of an expandable apparatus. A force may be exerted on the push sleeve disposed within the tubular body sufficient to bias the push sleeve axially downward and to retract one or more expandable features coupled to the push sleeve. A valve coupled to a valve port that extends between the fluid passageway and a lower annular chamber may be opened and drilling fluid may flow into the lower annular chamber in communication with a lower surface of the push sleeve. A force may be exerted by the drilling fluid on the lower surface of the push sleeve, moving the push sleeve axially upward and expanding the one or more expandable features coupled to the push sleeve.
In one or more additional embodiments, a method of operating an expandable apparatus may comprise expanding at least one expandable feature coupled to a tubular body and retracting the at least one expandable feature. The foregoing sequence of expanding and retracting can be repeated an unlimited number of times.
Still other embodiments of the disclosure comprise push sleeves employable with an expandable apparatus. In one or more embodiments, such push sleeves may comprise means for coupling the push sleeve to one or more expandable features. The push sleeve may further include an upper annular surface and a lower annular surface, the lower annular surface comprising a larger surface area than the upper annular surface.
In a further embodiment, an apparatus for use downhole is disclosed that in one configuration includes a downhole tool configured to move between a first mode and second mode which, for some applications, may be further respectively characterized as an inactive position and an active position.
In yet a further embodiment, an actuation device includes a housing including an annular chamber configured to house a first fluid therein, a piston in the annular chamber configured to divide the annular chamber into a first section and a second section, the piston being coupled to a biasing member, and a control unit configured to move the first fluid from the first section to the second section to supply a second fluid under pressure to a downhole tool to move the tool into the active position and from the second section to the first section to stop the supply of the second fluid to the tool to cause the tool to move into the inactive position.
In another embodiment, the apparatus comprises a system including a telemetry unit that sends a first pattern recognition signal to the control unit to move the tool into the active position and a second pattern recognition signal to move the tool into the inactive position.
The illustrations presented herein are, in some instances, not actual views of any particular expandable apparatus, but are merely idealized representations that are employed to describe the present invention. Additionally, elements common between figures may retain the same numerical designation.
Various embodiments of the disclosure are directed to expandable apparatus. By way of example and not limitation, an expandable apparatus may comprise an expandable reamer apparatus, an expandable stabilizer apparatus or similar apparatus.
The expandable apparatus 100 may include a generally cylindrical tubular body 105 having a longitudinal axis L8. The tubular body 105 of the expandable apparatus 100 may have a lower end 110 and an upper end 115. The terms “lower” and “upper,” as used herein with reference to the ends 110, 115, refer to the typical positions of the ends 110, 115 relative to one another when the expandable apparatus 100 is positioned within a wellbore. The lower end 110 of the tubular body 105 of the expandable apparatus 100 may include a set of threads (e.g., a threaded male pin member) for connecting the lower end 110 to another section of a drill string or another component of a bottom hole assembly (BHA), such as, for example, a drill collar or collars carrying a pilot drill bit for drilling a wellbore. Similarly, the upper end 115 of the tubular body 105 of the expandable apparatus 100 may include a set of threads (e.g., a threaded female box member) for connecting the upper end 115 to another section of a drill string or another component of a bottom hole assembly (BHA) (e.g., an upper sub).
At least one expandable feature may be positioned along the expandable apparatus 100. For example, three expandable features configured as sliding cutter blocks or blades 120, 125, 130 (see
The expandable apparatus 100 may optionally include a plurality of stabilizer blocks 135, 140 and 145. In some embodiments, the mid stabilizer block 140 and the lower stabilizer block 145 may be combined into a unitary stabilizer block. The stabilizer blocks 135, 140, 145 help to center the expandable apparatus 100 in the drill hole while being run into position through a casing or liner string and also while drilling and reaming the borehole. In other embodiments, no stabilizer blocks may be employed. In such embodiments, the tubular body 105 may comprise a larger outer diameter in the longitudinal portion where the stabilizer blocks are shown in
The upper stabilizer block 135 may be used to stop or limit the forward motion of the blades 120, 125, 130 (see also
Referring to
In other embodiments, the push sleeve 305 may comprise an upper surface 310 and a lower surface 315 at opposing longitudinal ends. Such a push sleeve 305 may be configured and positioned so that the upper surface 310 comprises a smaller annular surface area than the lower surface 315 to create a greater force on the lower surface 315 than on the upper surface 310 when a like pressure is exerted on both surfaces by a pressurized fluid, as described in more detail below.
The stationary sleeve 215 comprises at least two fluid ports 320′ and 320″ and generally referred to collectively as fluid ports 320, axially separated by a necked down orifice 325 proximate an upper end of the stationary sleeve 215. The fluid ports 320 are positioned in communication with an upper annular chamber 330 located between an inner sidewall of the tubular body 105 and the outer surfaces of the stationary sleeve 215, and in communication with the upper surface 310 of the push sleeve 305. The stationary sleeve 215 may further include a plurality of nozzle ports 335 that may selectively communicate with a plurality of nozzles (not shown) for directing a drilling fluid toward the blades 120, 125, 130 when the blades are extended. A valve 340 is coupled to the lower end of the stationary sleeve 215 to selectively control the flow of fluid from the fluid passageway 205 to a lower annular chamber 345 between the inner sidewall of the tubular body 105 and the outer surfaces of the stationary sleeve 215, and in communication with the lower surface 315 of the push sleeve 305.
In operation, the push sleeve 305 is originally positioned toward the lower end 110 with the valve 340 closed, as shown in
When the valve 340 is selectively opened, as will be described in greater detail below, the fluid also flows from the fluid passageway 205 into the lower annular chamber 345, causing the fluid to pressurize the lower annular chamber 345, exerting a force on the lower surface 315 of the push sleeve 305. As described above, the lower surface 315 of the push sleeve 305 has a larger surface area than the upper surface 310. Therefore, with equal or substantially equal pressures applied to the upper surface 310 and lower surface 315 by the fluid, the force applied on the lower surface 315, having the larger surface area, will be greater than the force applied on the upper surface 310, having the smaller surface area, by virtue of the fact that force is equal to the pressure applied multiplied by the area to which it is applied. The resultant net force is upward, causing the push sleeve 305 to slide upward, and extending the blades 120, 125, 130, as shown in
When it is desired to retract the blades 120, 125, 130, the valve 340 is closed to inhibit the fluid from flowing into the lower annular chamber 345 and applying a pressure on the lower surface 315 of the push sleeve 305. When the valve 340 is closed, a volume of drilling fluid will remain trapped in the lower annular chamber 345. At least one pressure relief nozzle 350 may accordingly be provided, extending through the sidewall of the tubular body 105 to allow the drilling fluid to escape from the lower annular chamber 345 and into an area between the borehole wall and the expandable apparatus 100 when the valve 340 is closed. The one or more pressure relief nozzles 350 may comprise a relatively small flow path so that a significant amount of pressure is not lost when the valve 340 is opened and the drilling fluid fills the lower annular chamber 345. By way of example and not limitation, at least one embodiment of the pressure relief nozzle 350 may comprise a flow path of about 0.125 inch (about 3.175 mm) in diameter. In addition to the one or more pressure relief nozzles 350, at least one high pressure release device 355 may be provided to provide pressure release should the pressure relief nozzle 350 fail (e.g., become plugged). The at least one high pressure release device 355 may comprise, for example, a backup burst disk, a high pressure check valve, or other device. In at least some embodiments, a screen (not shown) may be positioned over the at least one pressure relief nozzle 350 and the at least one high pressure release device 355 on both sides of the sidewall of tubular body 105 to inhibit the flow of materials that may plug at least one pressure relief nozzle 350 and the at least one high pressure release device 355.
In the non-limiting example set forth above in which the difference in pressure between inside the expandable apparatus 100 and outside the expandable apparatus 100 is about 1,000 (one thousand) psi (about 6.894 MPa) and the surface area of the upper surface 310 is about 3 in2 (about 19.3 cm2), the net downward force would be about 3,000 (three thousand) lbs (about 13.345 kN) to bias the push sleeve 305 downward.
As stated above, the stationary sleeve 215 includes a necked down orifice 325 near the upper portion thereof between the upper fluid port 320′ and the lower fluid port 320″. The necked down orifice 325 comprises a portion of the stationary sleeve 215 in which the diameter of the inner bore 210 is reduced. By reducing the diameter through which the drilling fluid may flow, the necked down orifice 325 creates an increased pressure upstream from the necked down orifice 325. The increased pressure above the necked down orifice 325 is typically monitored by conventional devices and this monitored pressure is conventionally referred to as the “monitored standpipe pressure.”
In at least some embodiments, when the push sleeve 305 is positioned at the axially lower limit of its path of travel and the blades 120, 125, 130 are fully retracted, the upper fluid port 320′ is exposed to the upper annular chamber 330, but the lower fluid port 320″ is at least substantially closed by the sidewall of the push sleeve 305. Similarly, nozzle ports 335 may be closed by the sidewall of the push sleeve 305 since the blades 120, 125, 130 are not engaging the borehole and do not need to be cleaned and cooled and no cuttings need to be washed to the surface of the borehole. When the push sleeve 305 is repositioned to the axially upper limit of its path of travel so the blades 120, 125, 130 are fully extended, the upper fluid port 320′, the lower fluid port 320″ and the nozzle ports 335 are all aligned with one or more openings (not shown) in the sidewall of push sleeve 305 so that fluid may flow through these ports 320′, 320″, 335.
The fluid flowing through the nozzle ports 335 is directed to one or more nozzles (not shown) to cool and clean the blades 120, 125, 130. With both the fluid ports 320 open to the upper annular chamber 330, the fluid exits the upper fluid port 320′ above the necked down orifice 325, into the upper annular chamber 330 and then back into the fluid passageway 205 through the lower fluid port 320″ below the necked down orifice 325. This increases the total flow area through which the drilling fluid may flow (e.g., through the necked down orifice 325 and through the upper annular chamber 330 by means of the fluid ports 320. The increase in the total flow area results in a substantial reduction in fluid pressure above the necked down orifice 325. This decrease in pressure may be detected by an operator and identified in data comprising the monitored standpipe pressure, and may indicate to the operator that the blades 120, 125, 130 of the expandable apparatus 100 are in the expanded position. In other words, the decrease in pressure may provide a signal to the operator that the blades 120, 125, 130 have been expanded for engaging the borehole.
In at least some embodiments, the pressure drop may be between about 140 psi and about 270 psi. In one non-limiting example, the stationary sleeve 215 may comprise an inner bore of about 2.25 inch (about 57.2 mm) and the fluid ports 320 may be about 2 inches (50.8 mm) long and about 1 inch (25.4 mm) wide. In such an embodiment, a necked down orifice 325 comprising an inner diameter of about 1.625 inches (about 41.275 mm) will result in a drop in the monitored standpipe pressure of about 140 psi (about 965 kPa), assuming there are no nozzles, (the nozzles being optional according to various embodiments). In another example of such an embodiment, a necked down orifice 325 comprising an inner diameter of about 1.4 inches (about 35.56 mm) will result in a drop in the monitored standpipe pressure of about 269 psi (about 1.855 MPa).
Various embodiments of the present disclosure may employ mechanically actuated or controlled valves 340 or electronically actuated or controlled valves 340.
With continued reference to
In operation, the valve cylinder 610 may be biased by a spring 615 exerting a force in the upward direction. The valve cylinder 610 may be configured with at least a portion having a reduced inner diameter, providing a constriction to downward flow of drilling fluid. When a drilling fluid flows through the valve cylinder 610 and the reduced inner diameter thereof, the pressure above the constriction created by the reduced inner diameter may be sufficient to overcome the upward force exerted by the spring 615, causing the valve cylinder 610 to bias downward and the spring 615 to compress. If the flow of drilling fluid is eliminated or reduced below a selected threshold, the upward force exerted by the spring 615 may be sufficient to bias the valve cylinder 610 at least partially upward.
Referring to
In order to open the valve 340, according to the embodiment of
In another embodiment, the valve cylinder 610 may have no apertures 730 or may have one or more apertures 730 which require both rotational and longitudinal displacement of valve cylinder 610 to open flow to one or more valve ports 620, and may be configured so that every other upper (or lower, as desired) hooked portion is configured to allow the valve cylinder 610, guided by engagement of pin track 705 with pin 715, to travel to a higher (or lower) respective position (as oriented in use) than the respective position allowed by the intermediate upper (or lower) hooked portions. For example, the second upper hooked portion 750 may be located at a respectively higher location than the first upper hooked portion 725, permitting greater longitudinal displacement of valve cylinder 610 with respect to valve sleeve 605, and permitting communication of one or more valve ports 620 with the interior of valve cylinder 610 when valve cylinder 610 is either at its higher or lower position, as desired. In other embodiments, as shown in
It will be apparent that the valve 340 as embodied according to any of the various embodiments described above may be opened and closed repeatedly by simply reducing the flow rate of the drilling fluid and again increasing the flow rate of the drilling fluid to cause the valve cylinder 610 to bias upward and downward, resulting in the rotational and axial displacement described above due to the pin and track arrangement. By way of example and not limitation, the valve 340 embodied as described above may be configured with a bore size and spring force so that a flow rate of about 400 gpm (about 1,514 lpm) or higher may be sufficient to adequately bias the valve cylinder 610 downward against the spring 615, while a flow rate of about 100 gpm (about 378 lpm) or lower may be sufficient to allow the spring 615 to bias the valve cylinder 610 upward.
In still another embodiment of the mechanically operated valve 340, the valve cylinder 610 may comprise an inner diameter configuration substantially similar to the valve cylinder 610 shown in
The controller 825 may comprise processing circuitry configured to obtain data, process data, send data, and combinations thereof. The processing circuitry may also control data access and storage, issue commands, and control other desired operations. The controller 825 may further include storage media coupled to the processing circuitry and configured to store executable code or instructions (e.g., software, firmware, or combinations thereof), electronic data, databases or other digital information and may include processor-usable media. The controller 825 may include a battery for providing electrical power to the various components thereof, including the drive device 820. The controller 825 may also include, or be operably coupled to, an apparatus state detection device coupled to the processing circuitry and configured to detect one or more selected states of the expandable apparatus 100. For example, the apparatus state detection device may comprise one or more accelerometers or magnetometers 850 configured to detect a rotational speed of the expandable apparatus 100, a rotational direction of the expandable apparatus 100, or a combination of rotational speed and rotational direction.
The controller 825 may include programming configured to change the state of the valve 810 in response to some predetermined command signal provided by an operator. One non-limiting example of a command signal may comprise rotating the expandable apparatus 100 at a given rotational speed for a determined period of time, stopping the rotation and repeating the rotation and stopping for some given number of times (e.g., three times). Such a combination of rotation and stopping is detected by one or more accelerometers 850 which may, for example, if not incorporated in a controller 825, may be placed in a separate compartment of tubular body 105. The controller 825 operates to open or close the valve 810 based on the detection of this combination by the accelerometers. Another non-limiting example of a command signal may comprise rotating the expandable apparatus 100 at a rate of 60 rpm for 60 seconds, followed by a rate of 90 rpm for 90 seconds. One of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that a plurality of possible signals and signal types may be employed for activating the controller 825.
As another approach to command signal detection, a removable module including accelerometers 850 and, optionally, other sensors such as magnetometers, may be placed in alignment with fluid passageway 205 at the upper end 115 or the lower end 110 of expandable apparatus 100 (see
As a result of each of the foregoing embodiments and equivalents thereof, expandable apparatuses of various embodiments of the disclosure may be expanded and contracted by an operator an unlimited number of times.
As shown in
Referring back to
As shown in
Although the foregoing disclosure illustrates embodiments of an expandable apparatus comprising an expandable reamer apparatus, the disclosure is not so limited. For example, in accordance with other embodiments of the disclosure, the expandable apparatus may comprise an expandable stabilizer, wherein the one or more expandable features may comprise stabilizer blocks (e.g., the blades 120, 125, 130 may be replaced with one or more stabilizer blocks).
In one aspect of operation, a suitable drilling fluid 1131 (also referred to as “mud”) from a source 1132 thereof, such as a mud pit, is circulated under pressure through the drill string 1120 by a mud pump 1134. The drilling fluid 1131 passes from the mud pump 1134 into the drill string 1120 via a de-surger 1136 and a fluid line 1138. The drilling fluid 1131a from the drilling tubular discharges at the borehole bottom 1151 through openings in the drill bit 1150. The returning drilling fluid 1131b circulates uphole through an annular space 1127 between the drill string 1120 and the borehole 1126 and returns to the source 1132 via a return line 1135 and drill cuttings 1186 screen 1185 that removes drill cuttings 1186 from the returning drilling fluid 1131b. A sensor S1 in fluid line 1138 provides information about the fluid flow rate. A surface torque sensor S2 and a sensor S3 associated with the drill string 1120 provide information about the torque and the rotational speed of the drill string 1120. Rate of penetration of the drill string 1120 may be determined from the sensor S5, while the sensor S6 may provide the hook load of the drill string 1120.
In some applications, the drill bit 1150 is rotated by rotating the drill pipe 1122. However, in other applications, a downhole motor 1155 such as, for example, a Moineau-type so-called “mud” motor or a turbine motor disposed in the drilling assembly 1190 may rotate the drill bit 1150. In embodiments, the rotation of the drill string 1120 may be selectively powered by one or both of surface equipment and the downhole motor 1155. The rate of penetration (“ROP”) for a given drill bit and BHA largely depends on the WOB, or other thrust force, applied to the drill bit 1150 and its rotational speed.
With continued reference to
The drilling assembly 1190 also contains formation evaluation sensors or devices (also referred to as measurement-while-drilling, “MWD,” or logging-while-drilling, “LWD,” sensors) determining resistivity, density, porosity, permeability, acoustic properties, nuclear-magnetic resonance properties, corrosive properties of the fluids or formation downhole, salt or saline content, and other selected properties of a formation 1195 surrounding the drilling assembly 1190. Such sensors are generally known in the art and for convenience are generally denoted herein by numeral 1165. The drilling assembly 1190 may further include a variety of other sensors and communication devices 1159 for controlling and/or determining one or more functions and properties of the drilling assembly (such as velocity, vibration, bending moment, acceleration, oscillations, whirl, stick-slip, etc.) and drilling operating parameters, such as weight-on-bit, fluid flow rate, pressure, temperature, rate of penetration, azimuth, tool face, drill bit rotation, etc.
Still referring to
Still referring to
With continued reference to
The operation of actuation device 1300, with reference to
As shown in
Referring back to
As yet another actuation device command signal alternative, rather than using drill string rotation or mud pulses, a series of different drilling fluid flow rates and durations may be used as patterns for detection by a downhole flow meter, which may be used to provide a pattern of signals to processor 1326. One example flow rate signal pattern may be characterized as 50 gpm for 20 seconds, then 100 gpm for 30 seconds, then zero flow for 30 seconds.
A further actuation device command signal alternative using flow detection by a flow meter may employ engagement of a drilling fluid (mud) pump for 30 seconds, followed by shut off for 30 seconds, followed by pump engagement for 45 seconds, followed by shut down.
Yet another actuation device command signal alternative using accelerometers for drill string motion detection may include axial motion of the drill string in combination with rotation. For example, the drill string may be lifted quickly by three feet (0.91 meter), dropped by two feet (0.60 meter), then rotated at 30 rpm for 30 seconds, and stopped for 30 seconds.
In all of the foregoing embodiments where command signals generated by detection of one or more of rotational drill string movement, axial drill string movement, drilling fluid pressure, and drilling fluid and/or flow rate in various combinations, including combinations with time periods, are employed, the reference numerals in the drawing figures are indicative of non-limiting examples of suitable locations, and presence of, sensors for detection of such parameters and circuitry for generation of command signals therefrom.
Thus, while certain embodiments have been described and shown in the accompanying drawings, such embodiments are merely illustrative and not restrictive of the scope of the invention, and this invention is not limited to the specific constructions and arrangements shown and described, since various other additions and modifications to, and deletions from, the described embodiments will be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art. The scope of the invention is, accordingly, limited only by the claims that follow herein, and legal equivalents thereof.
This application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/537,542, filed Nov. 10, 2014, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,719,304, issued Aug. 1, 2017, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/895,233, filed Sep. 30, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,881,833, issued Nov. 11, 2014, which application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/247,162, filed Sep. 30, 2009, entitled “Remotely Activated and Deactivated Expandable Apparatus for Earth Boring Applications,” and claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/377,146, entitled “Remotely-Controlled Device and Method for Downhole Actuation” filed Aug. 26, 2010, the disclosure of each of which is hereby incorporated herein in its entirety by this reference. This application is also related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/169,743, filed Jun. 27, 2011, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,175,520, issued Nov. 3, 2015, for “Remotely Controlled Apparatus for Downhole Applications, Components for Such Apparatus, Remote Status Indication Devices for such Apparatus, and Related Methods,” and to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/252,644, filed Oct. 4, 2011, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,464,812, issued Jun. 18, 2013, for “Remotely Controlled Apparatus for Downhole Applications and Related Methods.”
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1678075 | Philipps | Jul 1928 | A |
2069482 | Seay | Feb 1937 | A |
2136518 | Nixon | Nov 1938 | A |
2177721 | Johnson et al. | Oct 1939 | A |
2328840 | O leary | Sep 1943 | A |
2344598 | Church | Mar 1944 | A |
2532418 | Page | Dec 1950 | A |
2638988 | Williams | May 1953 | A |
2754089 | Kammerer, Jr. | Jul 1956 | A |
2758819 | Kammerer, Jr. | Aug 1956 | A |
2834578 | Carr | May 1958 | A |
2874784 | Baker et al. | Feb 1959 | A |
2882019 | Carr et al. | Apr 1959 | A |
2922627 | Kammerer | Jan 1960 | A |
3011558 | Conrad | Dec 1961 | A |
3083765 | Kammerer | Apr 1963 | A |
3105562 | Stone et al. | Oct 1963 | A |
3123162 | Rowley | Mar 1964 | A |
3126065 | Chadderdon | Mar 1964 | A |
3171502 | Kammerer | Mar 1965 | A |
3211232 | Grimmer | Oct 1965 | A |
3224507 | Cordary, Jr. | Dec 1965 | A |
3283834 | Kammerer | Nov 1966 | A |
3289760 | Kammerer | Dec 1966 | A |
3351134 | Kammerer | Nov 1967 | A |
3351137 | Schulz et al. | Nov 1967 | A |
3425500 | Fuchs | Feb 1969 | A |
3433313 | Brown | Mar 1969 | A |
3556233 | Gilreath et al. | Jan 1971 | A |
4064951 | Weber | Dec 1977 | A |
4067388 | Mouret et al. | Jan 1978 | A |
4403659 | Upchurch | Sep 1983 | A |
4458761 | Van Vreeswyk | Jul 1984 | A |
4491022 | de la Cruz | Jan 1985 | A |
4545441 | Williamson | Oct 1985 | A |
4574883 | Carroll et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
4589504 | Simpson | May 1986 | A |
4660657 | Furse et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4690229 | Raney | Sep 1987 | A |
4693328 | Furse et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4756372 | Airey | Jul 1988 | A |
4776394 | Lynde et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4842083 | Raney | Jun 1989 | A |
4848490 | Anderson | Jul 1989 | A |
4854403 | Ostertag et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4884477 | Smith et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4889197 | Boe | Dec 1989 | A |
4893675 | Skipper | Jan 1990 | A |
4893678 | Stokley et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4938291 | Lynde et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4944350 | Airey | Jul 1990 | A |
4971146 | Terrell | Nov 1990 | A |
5018580 | Skipper | May 1991 | A |
5101895 | Gilbert | Apr 1992 | A |
5127477 | Schultz | Jul 1992 | A |
5139098 | Blake | Aug 1992 | A |
5168933 | Pritchard et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5211241 | Mashaw et al. | May 1993 | A |
5224558 | Lee | Jul 1993 | A |
5265684 | Rosenhauch | Nov 1993 | A |
5293945 | Rosenhauch et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5305833 | Collins | Apr 1994 | A |
5309993 | Coon et al. | May 1994 | A |
5311954 | Quintana | May 1994 | A |
5318131 | Baker | Jun 1994 | A |
5318137 | Johnson et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5318138 | Dewey et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5332048 | Underwood et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5343963 | Bouldin | Sep 1994 | A |
5361859 | Tibbitts | Nov 1994 | A |
5368114 | Tandberg et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5375662 | Echols, III et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5425423 | Dobson et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5437308 | Morin et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5443129 | Bailey et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5553678 | Barr et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5560440 | Tibbitts et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5740864 | de Hoedt et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5788000 | Maury et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5791409 | Flanders | Aug 1998 | A |
5823254 | Dobson et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5862870 | Hutchinson et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5874784 | Aoki et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5887655 | Haugen et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
6039131 | Beaton | Mar 2000 | A |
6059051 | Jewkes et al. | May 2000 | A |
6070677 | Johnston | Jun 2000 | A |
6109354 | Ringgenberg et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6116336 | Adkins et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6131675 | Anderson | Oct 2000 | A |
6173795 | McGarian et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6189631 | Sheshtawy | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6213206 | Bakke | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6213226 | Eppink et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6227312 | Eppink et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6263969 | Stoesz et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6289999 | Dewey et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6325151 | Vincent et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6378612 | Churchill | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6378632 | Dewey | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6439305 | Bakke | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6488104 | Eppink et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6494272 | Eppink et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6615933 | Eddison | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6668936 | Williamson, Jr. et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6668949 | Rives | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6681860 | Yokley et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6702020 | Zachman et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6708785 | Russell et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6732817 | Dewey | May 2004 | B2 |
6854521 | Echols et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6857473 | Cook et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6889771 | Leising et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6978844 | LaFleur | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7036611 | Radford et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7048078 | Dewey et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7308937 | Radford et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7314099 | Dewey et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7357198 | McGarian et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7383881 | Telfer | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7389828 | Ritter et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7513318 | Underwood et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7604072 | Pastusek et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7757787 | Mackay et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7886834 | Spencer et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7900717 | Radford et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8028767 | Radford et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8069916 | Giroux et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8074747 | Radford et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8118105 | Wright | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8235144 | Rasheed | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8485277 | Hulden et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8511404 | Rasheed | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8528668 | Rasheed | Sep 2013 | B2 |
9097820 | Rasheed | Aug 2015 | B2 |
20020070052 | Armell | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20030029644 | Hoffmaster et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20040119607 | Davies et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040134687 | Radford et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20060207797 | Dewey et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060249307 | Ritter et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070163808 | Campbell et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070205022 | Treviranus et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070246217 | Tulloch et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080128169 | Radford et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080128174 | Radford et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080128175 | Radford et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20090032308 | Eddison | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090044944 | Murray et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090050373 | Loretz | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090145666 | Radford et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090173541 | Tulloch et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090266544 | Redlinger | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100006339 | Desai | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100089583 | Xu et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100108394 | Ollerenshaw et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100224414 | Radford et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100282511 | Maranuk et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100288557 | Radford | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110005836 | Radford et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110073330 | Radford | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110073371 | Radford | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110073376 | Radford et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110127044 | Radford et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110203849 | Radford et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110266060 | Radford et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110284233 | Wu et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110308861 | Radford | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120048571 | Radford et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120080183 | Radford et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120080231 | Radford et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20130333879 | Rasheed | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140060933 | Rasheed | Mar 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2108916 | Apr 1994 | CA |
1717528 | Jan 2006 | CN |
1816679 | Aug 2006 | CN |
101657601 | Feb 2010 | CN |
246789 | Nov 1987 | EP |
0594420 | Apr 1994 | EP |
1036913 | Sep 2000 | EP |
1044314 | Mar 2005 | EP |
1614852 | Nov 2006 | EP |
2327857 | Mar 2014 | EP |
2328964 | Mar 1999 | GB |
2344122 | May 2000 | GB |
2344607 | Jun 2000 | GB |
2319276 | Feb 2001 | GB |
2353310 | Feb 2001 | GB |
2344607 | Feb 2003 | GB |
2344122 | Apr 2003 | GB |
0316779 | Aug 2003 | GB |
2408272 | Jun 2006 | GB |
2393461 | Oct 2006 | GB |
2426269 | Feb 2007 | GB |
2441286 | Mar 2008 | GB |
2438333 | Dec 2008 | GB |
2437878 | Jul 2009 | GB |
2446745 | Aug 2009 | GB |
2460096 | Nov 2009 | GB |
2420803 | Jan 2010 | GB |
2465504 | May 2010 | GB |
2465505 | May 2010 | GB |
2449594 | Nov 2010 | GB |
2476653 | Jun 2011 | GB |
2455242 | Jul 2011 | GB |
2470159 | Jul 2012 | GB |
2473561 | Jul 2012 | GB |
2479298 | Dec 2013 | GB |
2521528 | Jun 2015 | GB |
0031371 | Jun 2000 | WO |
2008150290 | Dec 2008 | WO |
2009156552 | Dec 2009 | WO |
2011080640 | Jul 2011 | WO |
2013166393 | Nov 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Canadian Office Action from Canadian Application No. 2,775,744, dated Jun. 25, 2013, 3 pages. |
Canadian Office Action from Canadian Application No. 2,775,744, dated Mar. 27, 2014, 3 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2010/050933 dated Apr. 3, 2012, 6 pages. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2010/050933 dated May 9, 2011, 3 pages. |
International Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2010/050933 dated May 9, 2011, 3 pages.4 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/399,531, filed Jul. 30, 2002, titled Expandable Reamer Apparatus for Enlarging Boreholes While Drilling and Method of Use, to Radford et al. |
For the American Heritage Dictionary definition: collet, (n.d.) The American Heritage (Registered) Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition. (2003). Retrieved May 29, 2014 from http://www.thefreedictionary.com/collet. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170335629 A1 | Nov 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61247162 | Sep 2009 | US | |
61377146 | Aug 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14537542 | Nov 2014 | US |
Child | 15663121 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12895233 | Sep 2010 | US |
Child | 14537542 | US |