Claims
- 1. A method comprising the steps ofreceiving a remote control signal at a servant aircraft; determining if the remote control signal is valid; and regardless of where the servant aircraft is, inhibiting anyone on the servant aircraft from controlling the flight of the servant aircraft if the remote control signal is valid.
- 2. The method of claim 1 whereinthe remote control signal is a global positioning satellite signal.
- 3. The method of claim 1 whereinthe remote control signal comes from an escort aircraft.
- 4. The method of claim 1 further comprisingchanging the flight of the servant aircraft in response to the remote control signal.
- 5. The method of claim 1 whereinthe step of inhibiting anyone on the servant aircraft from controlling the flight of the servant aircraft includes disabling a pilot input device which normally can be used to control the flight of the servant aircraft by someone on board the servant aircraft.
- 6. A servant aircraft comprised ofa receiver; a processor; and and a pilot input device which normally is used to control flight of the servant aircraft; wherein receiver is adapted to receive a remote control signal; and wherein the processor is programmed to examine the remote control signal to determine if the remote control signal is valid, and regardless of where the servant aircraft is, if the remote control signal is valid, the processor is programmed to send a signal to disable the pilot input device to inhibit anyone on board the servant aircraft from controlling the flight of the servant aircraft.
- 7. The servant aircraft of claim 6 whereinthe remote control signal is a global positioning satellite signal.
- 8. The servant aircraft of claim 6 whereinthe remote control signal comes from an escort aircraft.
- 9. A method comprisingsending a remote control signal from an escort aircraft; controlling the flight of a servant aircraft by use of the remote control signal so that a collision between the servant aircraft and an off limits facility is avoided; and wherein the off limits facility is not the escort aircraft.
- 10. The method of claim 9 whereinthe off limits facility is a further aircraft, which is not the escort aircraft.
- 11. The method of claim 9 whereinthe off limits facility is a building.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION
This present application is a continuation in part of and claims the priority of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/245,619, filed on Sep. 17, 2002, inventor and applicant, Lawrence J. Koncelik Jr., titled “CONTROLLING AIRCRAFT FROM COLLISIONS WITH OFF LIMITS FACILITIES”.
US Referenced Citations (7)
Continuation in Parts (1)
|
Number |
Date |
Country |
Parent |
10/245619 |
Sep 2002 |
US |
Child |
10/302363 |
|
US |