All publications and patent applications mentioned in this specification are herein incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each individual publication or patent application was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference.
The invention relates to intramuscular electrodes, such as diaphragm pacing electrodes.
Intramuscular diaphragm pacing stimulation (DPS) has been shown to be a viable therapeutic technique for replacement of chronic mechanical ventilation in patients with respiratory insufficiency, such as high-level spinal cord injury. DPS has also been demonstrated to have a clinically relevant effect in conditioning the diaphragm of patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. These therapeutic applications of electrodes are ones in which the electrode are typically designed to be implanted for duration of the life of the patient or until mechanical failure of the electrode. Therefore, the electrodes are typically constructed with significant redundancy, reinforcement, and barbing to promote longevity and stabilization in the target muscle.
Some intramuscular electrodes have been developed for shorter-term applications. For example, intramuscular, percutaneous, single-helix design electrodes have been used for functional electrical stimulation in applications where the electrode is placed through a percutaneous needle insertion into the target muscle. These electrodes are typically removed by pulling axially on the electrode lead. However, the barbs on the electrodes, as well as fibrosis and encapsulation of the electrode by the surrounding tissue, frequently resist or complicate removal of the electrodes. The electrodes and/or the wires extending proximally from them therefore frequently break during removal, thus leaving the electrode or a portion thereof in the muscle or subcutaneous tissue, as well as creating an undesirable level of tissue disturbance. See Peterson et al., “Long-Term Intramuscular Electrical Activation of the Phrenic Nerve: Safety and Reliability,” IEEE Trans Biomed. Eng., vol. 41, no. 12 pp. 1115-26 (December 1994).
A number of design features are desirable in intramuscular electrodes that have not yet been fully met by available products. Most basically, intramuscular electrodes need to meet the design criteria of being able to deliver the desired level of stimulus to target tissue, and be able to mechanically survive such use. If extraction of the electrode is necessary, it is an advantage for the electrode to survive extraction without breaking apart and generating “unretrieved device fragments” (UDFs). UDFs are a serious hazard; the FDA health notifications report about 1000 adverse events per year that are related to UDFs. Additionally, the extraction undesirably and almost inevitably visits at least some trauma upon the target tissue. Data have shown that extractions of simple intramuscular helical electrodes (Case Western Reserve University type) result in a fracture rate of 53% of electrodes with known status of integrity recorded (Knutson et al., “Electrode fracture rates and occurrences of infection and granuloma associated with percutaneous intramuscular electrodes in upper-limb functional electrical stimulation applications,” J. Rehab. Res. & Dev., vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 671-83 (November/December 2002)). See also Bhadra et al., “Extraction Force and Tissue Change During Removal of a Tined Intramuscular Electrode from Rat Gastrocnemius,” Ann. Biomed. Eng., vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 1042-50 (June 2006).
For percutaneous muscle stimulation of a temporary or short-term duration, it is desirable to use electrodes that can be easily removed without significant trauma to the muscle or other surrounding tissue and without leaving portions of the electrode behind. The present invention provides such electrodes and a method of using such electrodes. In some embodiments, the invention is a removable, percutaneous electrode that may be implanted into muscle tissue using laparoscopic, thorascopic, or open surgical techniques.
The invention relates to a medical electrode system that includes a removably-implantable electrode and methods of using the system, such methods being summarized below after first summarizing the system. The medical electrode system includes an electrode, an electrical lead mechanically and electrically connected to the electrode and extending proximally from the electrode, and an electrode tether bonded to the electrode and extending proximally from the electrode. In some embodiments, the medical electrode system may further include a tissue-piercing guide attached to the distal end of the electrode; and in some of these embodiments the tissue piercing guide may include a needle having a flared proximal end and a sharp distal end.
In some embodiments of the medical electrode system, the electrical lead surrounds at least a portion of the tether. The electrical lead of the system includes an insulated conductor, and the electrode includes an uninsulated portion of the conductor. The medical electrode system may further include an electrical connector attached to a proximal end of the electrical lead, and the electrical connector may be mechanically attached to the tether.
In some embodiments, the medical electrode system may further include a flexible barb. In some embodiments, the tether includes a core that extends through the electrical lead and the electrode; in some of these embodiments that core does not extend through the barb. In some embodiments of the system, the core is connected to the tissue-piecing guide.
In some embodiments of the medical electrode system the tissue-piercing guide comprises a needle, and in some of these embodiments, the needle may have a flared proximal end and a sharp distal end. In some embodiments of medical electrode system the core may include a distally terminal knob positioned distal to the electrode; the knob being configured to engage a delivery instrument to facilitate ejection of the electrode from the instrument.
With regard to the method aspect of the invention, a method of using an electrode in target tissue in a patient includes inserting a tissue-piercing guide into and through the target tissue, pulling an electrode connected to a proximal end of the tissue-piercing guide into the target tissue (the electrode being connected to the tissue-piercing guide by a tether extending distally from the electrode), and extending an electrical lead and the tether proximally from the electrode to an electrical connection location. In some embodiments of the method, the electrode includes a barb, and the method includes pulling the barb into the target tissue.
Method embodiments of using the electrode may further include cutting the tether between the electrode and the tissue-piercing guide after the pulling step, and removing the tissue-piercing guide from the patient. The method may also further include removing the electrode from the target tissue; the removing step may include pulling proximally on the electrical lead and pulling proximally on the tether. In some embodiments of the system, the electrical lead and the tether terminate in an electrical connector, and with these embodiments, the step of removing step may further include removing the electrical connector from the electrical lead and tether. In some embodiments of the system, the electrical lead surrounds at least a portion of the tether, and with these embodiments, the step of removing the electrode may further include separating the electrical lead and the tether prior to the pulling steps.
In another embodiment of a method for using the electrode system in a target tissue of a patient, the method includes inserting an electrode into the target tissue (the electrode being bonded to a tether and electrically connected to an electrical lead), and extending an electrical lead and the tether proximally from the electrode to an electrical connection location. In some embodiments, the method may further include removing the electrode from the target tissue, in which case the removing step includes pulling proximally on the electrical lead and pulling proximally on the tether. In some embodiments of the system, the electrical lead and tether terminate in an electrical connecter, and in such embodiments the removing step may further include removing the electrical connector from the electrical lead and tether. In some embodiments of the system, the electrical lead surrounds at least a portion of the tether, and in such embodiments, the removing step may further include separating the electrical lead and the tether prior to the pulling steps.
The novel features of the invention are set forth with particularity in the claims that follow. A better understanding of the features and advantages of the present invention will be obtained by reference to the following detailed description that sets forth illustrative embodiments in which the principles of the invention are utilized, and by reference to the accompanying drawings.
Data have shown that forces necessary for extraction range from about 0.25N at time of implant to 6.0N after four weeks of implantation. More complex intramuscular helical electrodes (Peterson type) have shown long-term stability, a cumulative total exceeding 520 implant electrode-years, without fracture, but significantly more force is required to extract them. The extraction force for Peterson type electrodes range from 0.6N at time of implant to 5.8N after four weeks of implantation. The force required to pull apart the heavy barbing of a Peterson type electrode ranges from 4N-8N. There is a need for therapeutic electrodes that have the structural integrity to resist breakage during extraction, in order to minimize the generation of UDFs, and/or have design features that minimize the force required for their extraction.
A tether, formed, for example, as a core 22, is disposed within the helix of lead 12 and electrode 10. The core 22 may be formed of a variety of materials, for example polypropylene suture material, absorbable suture material or any other suitable material. Core 22 being flexible, it imparts flexibility to the electrode as a whole. Core 22 is primarily attached or bonded to electrode 10, but the core's attachment may extend to or through the length of lead 12. Attachment of the core, at the site of electrode 10, may be performed by a mechanical heating that results in an infiltration and expansion of the core material into the electrode windings. This mechanical fixation results in a structural integrity that can withstand 10N of force to pull the core from the electrode, thus significantly reducing or eliminating the generation of unretrieved device fragments upon extraction. In the embodiments shown in
The electrode of this invention may be delivered and implanted into muscle tissue by any conventional means. The embodiments shown in
As shown, the proximal end of needle 30 has the same diameter as the needle shaft. Alternatively, the proximal end of the needle 30 may be flared to create an opening and facilitate entry of the electrode through the target tissue (such as the epimysium and muscle fibers of the diaphragm).
The size of the needle depends on the application and/or site to which the electrode is being directed. For implantation of a temporary intramuscular electrode in the diaphragm, suitable needle sizes range from 28 gauge to 16 gauge. Other applications may require other needle sizes either larger or smaller. The shaft of needle 30 is typically longer than the length of the de-insulated electrode. For example, for use of an embodiment in the diaphragm, the portion of electrode 10 in line with lead 12 may have a length of about 10 mm, while barb 14 may have a length of about 5 mm. In this embodiment, the shaft of needle 30 may be about 20 mm long, and the curved tip 32 may extend about 2.5 mm up from the needle shaft axis. The portion of core 22 extending past electrode 10 to needle 30 is about 20 mm. Electrical lead 12 must be long enough to extend from the implantation site in the diaphragm to the connector 16 outside of the patient, a length of at least about 300 mm.
When implanting the electrode of
Connector 16 and the proximal end of lead 12 may be tunneled subcutaneously before exiting through the patient's skin via a needle (or trocar) puncture to provide a connection to an external stimulator. After the electrode is in the desired location in the diaphragm, core 22 may be cut between the proximal end of needle 30 and the core's exit point from the diaphragm, and the needle may be removed from the patient.
Certain forms of diaphragm pacing may be performed for a finite period of time. For example, diaphragm pacing may help wean patients from mechanical ventilation sooner and more easily than could otherwise be weaned. Once diaphragm pacing is no longer needed, removal of the electrode and lead from the patient's diaphragm and abdomen is desired.
To remove electrode 10 from the patient, connector 16 is first cut off the proximal end of lead 12. Since core 22 is bound to connector 16 but is not bound to the insulated portion of lead 12, cutting off the connector allows the proximal ends of core 22 and lead 12 to be moved independently. Helical lead 12 may then be straightened, or unwound from around the core and pulled proximally to dislodge electrode 10 from the tissue. Concurrently, core 22 may be pulled proximally as well, independently of lead 12. The combination of the pulling effects of the lead and the core helps the electrode become dislodged from the tissue despite any encapsulation or fibrosis around the electrode. In addition, the electrode barb 14 may straighten in response to sufficient proximal force to allow the electrode to exit the tissue more easily.
This application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §119 to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/899,799, filed on Feb. 5, 2007, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1693734 | Waggoner | Dec 1928 | A |
| 2532788 | Sarnoff | Dec 1950 | A |
| 2664880 | Wales, Jr. | Jan 1954 | A |
| 4699875 | Appel | Oct 1987 | A |
| 4773393 | Haber et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
| 4827935 | Geddes et al. | May 1989 | A |
| 4830008 | Meer | May 1989 | A |
| 4863438 | Gauderer et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
| 4989617 | Memberg et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
| 5056519 | Vince | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5074846 | Clegg et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
| 5146918 | Kallok et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5314463 | Camps et al. | May 1994 | A |
| 5335657 | Terry et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5368035 | Hamm et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5429636 | Shikhman et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5472438 | Schmit et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5483969 | Testerman et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5524632 | Stein et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5527358 | Mehmanesh et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5678535 | DiMarco | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5716392 | Bourgeois et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5718248 | Trumble et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5792165 | Klieman et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5797923 | Aiyar et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5813399 | Isaza et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5814086 | Hirschberg et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5849290 | Brown et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5851783 | Appel et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 6035856 | LaFontaine et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6194217 | Matson | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6198970 | Freed et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6210970 | Matson | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6245053 | Benjamin | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6254425 | Shchervinsky et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6311692 | Vaska et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6321109 | Ben-Haim et al. | Nov 2001 | B2 |
| 6360740 | Ward et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6397108 | Camps et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6405732 | Edwards et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6415183 | Scheiner et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6463327 | Lurie et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6477423 | Jenkins | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6571127 | Ben-Haim et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6645145 | Dreschel et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6845271 | Fang et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
| 6918871 | Schulze | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6947792 | Ben-Haim et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 7006871 | Darvish et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
| 7044921 | Asmus et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7071194 | Teng | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7107092 | Goldstein et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7120497 | Ben-Haim et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7155278 | King et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7165551 | Edwards et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7195881 | Geffard | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7206636 | Turcott | Apr 2007 | B1 |
| 7207946 | Sirokman | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7221978 | Ben-Haim et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7225016 | Koh | May 2007 | B1 |
| 7329489 | Kaddurah-Daouk et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7356521 | Wang et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7418298 | Shiroff et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
| 8706236 | Ignagni et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 20010025177 | Woloszko et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
| 20010049497 | Kalloo et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20020103424 | Swoyer et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20030040785 | Maschino et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030148404 | Michaelson | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030171672 | Varghese et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030175832 | Marton et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030195600 | Tronnes et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20040003813 | Banner et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040044377 | Larsson | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040064069 | Reynolds et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040122360 | Waldhauser et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040127954 | McDonald | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040167437 | Sharrow et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040167442 | Shireman et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040167443 | Shireman et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040172090 | Janzig et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040177388 | Botas et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040254572 | McIntyre et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040260198 | Rothberg et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040260245 | Clem et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040260246 | Desmond | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040260337 | Freed | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050021102 | Ignagni et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050033394 | Seifert et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050042589 | Hatlestad et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050049523 | Crank | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050054950 | Parins | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050054951 | Parins | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050054952 | Eskuri et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050080463 | Stahmann et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050085734 | Tehrani | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050085865 | Tehrani | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050085866 | Tehrani | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050085867 | Tehrani et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050085868 | Tehrani et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050085869 | Tehrani et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050107781 | Ostrovsky et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050107812 | Starksen et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050107860 | Ignagni et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050109340 | Tehrani | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050113710 | Stahmann et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050115561 | Stahmann et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050124917 | Skujins et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050137501 | Euteneuer et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050148026 | Bowser et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050148818 | Mesallum | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050165457 | Benser et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050209653 | Herbert et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050240241 | Yun et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050277945 | Saadat et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060030894 | Tehrani | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060035849 | Spiegelman et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060036294 | Tehrani | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060041022 | Pasinetti | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060068452 | Goldknopf et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060088862 | Lee | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060115854 | Goldknopf et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060115855 | Goldknopf et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060115856 | Goldknopf et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060115867 | Goldknopf et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060121619 | Bowser | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060122662 | Tehrani et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060130161 | Genain | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060130833 | Younes | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060142815 | Tehrani et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060149316 | DeVries et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060149334 | Tehrani et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060155222 | Sherman et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060155341 | Tehrani et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060160087 | McGrath et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060167523 | Tehrani et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060200004 | Wilk | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060224209 | Meyer | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060237023 | Cox et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060247729 | Tehrani et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060258667 | Teng | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060281809 | Miller et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060282131 | Caparso et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060286167 | Staunton et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060287679 | Stone | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070016172 | Charukhchian | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070017809 | Goldknopf et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070021421 | Hampton | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070021500 | Twyman et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070021795 | Tehrani | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070038127 | Goldstein et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070049793 | Ignagni et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070054852 | Lin et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070072943 | Miller et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070078099 | McLaurin | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070087000 | Walsh et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070087314 | Gomo | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070098812 | Feinstein et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070117772 | Bennett et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070118183 | Gelfand et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070122813 | Salomon et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070150006 | Libbus et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070150023 | Ignagni et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070172820 | Kaddurah-Daouk et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070191908 | Jacob et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070196780 | Ware et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070197932 | Feke et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070202515 | Hadlock et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070202537 | Lingappa et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070221224 | Pittman et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070225261 | Miller et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070240718 | Daly | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070250162 | Royalty | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070265611 | Ignagni et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070274992 | Michalovich et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070282388 | Sandyk | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070292403 | Nivaggioli | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070292410 | Cashman et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070298998 | Paige et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080003208 | Nivaggioli | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080121231 | Sinderby et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20110060381 | Ignagni et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20130238053 | Ignagni et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 996482 | May 2000 | EP |
| 873155 | Jun 2003 | EP |
| 1634617 | Mar 2006 | EP |
| 1653863 | May 2006 | EP |
| 1658020 | May 2006 | EP |
| 1660177 | May 2006 | EP |
| 1663370 | Jun 2006 | EP |
| 1667757 | Jun 2006 | EP |
| 1670611 | Jun 2006 | EP |
| 1684655 | Aug 2006 | EP |
| 1393773 | Oct 2006 | EP |
| 1306104 | Jan 2007 | EP |
| 1205202 | Jun 2007 | EP |
| WO 8600234 | Jan 1986 | WO |
| WO 2005039691 | May 2005 | WO |
| WO2005044079 | May 2005 | WO |
| WO 2006062710 | Jun 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006079152 | Aug 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006083675 | Aug 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006088696 | Aug 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006121447 | Nov 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006124023 | Nov 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006131150 | Dec 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006138069 | Dec 2006 | WO |
| WO 2007035804 | Mar 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007053230 | May 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007058780 | May 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007058938 | May 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007061902 | May 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007082384 | Jul 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007103585 | Sep 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007109443 | Sep 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007128002 | Nov 2007 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Ayas et al; Prevention of human diaphragm atrophy with short periods of electrical stimulation; Am J Respir Crit Care Med; vol. 159; pp. 2018-2020; 1999. |
| Bhadra et al.; Extraction force and tissue change during removal of a tined intramuscular electrode from rat gastrocnemius; Annals of Biomedical Engineering; vol. 34; No. 6; pp. 1042-1050; Jun. 2006. |
| DiMarco et al.; Phrenic nerve pacing in a tetraplegic patient via intramuscular diaphragm electrodes; American Joumal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine; vol. 166 (12 Pt 1); pp. 1604-1606; Dec. 15, 2002. |
| DiMarco A. F.; Restoration of respiratory muscle function following spinal cord injury—Review of electrical and magnetic stimulation techniques; Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology; 147; 273-287; 2005. |
| Knutson et al.; Electrode fracture rates and occurrences of infection and granuloma associated with percutaneous intramuscular electrodes in upper-limb functional electrical stimulation applications; Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development; vol. 39; No. 6; pp. 671-684, Nov./Dec. 2002. |
| Nochomovitz et al.; Conditioning of the diaphragm with phrenic nerve stimulation after prolonged disuse; American Review of Respiratory Disease; vol. 130; No. 4; 325-329; Oct. 1984. |
| Nochomovitz et al.; Diaphragm activation with intramuscular stimulation in dogs; American Review of Respiratory Disease; vol. 127; No. 3; 685-687; Mar. 1983. |
| Onders et al.; Early results of laparoscopic motor point diaphragm pacing in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (Abstracts from the 16th Intl. Symp. ALS/MND; vol. 6, supp. 1; ISSN1743-4475; pp. 142-143; Dec. 2005. |
| Onders et al.; Mapping the phrenic nerve motor point: the key to a successful laparoscopic diaphragm pacing system in the first human series; Surgery; vol. 136; No. 4; 819-26; Oct. 2004. |
| Peterson et al.; Long-term intramuscular electrical activation of the phrenic nerve: Safety and reliability; IEEE; vol. 41; No. 12; pp. 1115-1126; Dec. 1994. |
| Peterson et al.; Electrical activation of respiratory muscles by methods other than phrenic nerve cuff electrodes; Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology; vol. 12; No. 5; pp. 854-878; May 1989. |
| Peterson et al.; Intramuscular electrical activation of the phrenic nerve; IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering; vol. BME-33; No. 3; 342-351; Mar. 1986. |
| Polkey et al.; Influence of acute lung volume change on contractile properties of human diaphragm; Journal of Applied Physiology; vol. 85, No. 4; pp. 1322-1328; Oct. 1998. |
| Sarnoff et al.; Electrophrenic respiration; Science; vol. 108; 482; Oct. 29, 1948. |
| Schmit, et al.; Laparoscopic placement of electrodes for diaphragm pacing using stimulation to locate the phrenic nerve motor points; IEEE Trans on Rehab Engineer; vol. 6; No. 4; 382-390; Dec. 1998. |
| Ignagni et al; U.S. Appl. No. 11/716,475 entitled “Ventilatory assist system and methods to improve respiratory function,” filed Mar. 9, 2007. |
| Ignagni et al; U.S. Appl. No. 11/467,025 entitled “Method and apparatus for grasping an abdominal wall,” filed Aug. 24, 2006. |
| Ignagni et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 12/690,410 entitled “Device and Method of Neuromodulation to Effect a Functionally Restorative Adaption of the Neuromuscular System,” filed Jan. 20, 2010. |
| Kalloo et al.; Flexible transgastric peritoneoscopy: a novel approach to diagnosis and therapeutic intervention in the peritoneal cavity; Gastrointestinal Endoscopy; vol. 60; No. 1; pp. 114-117; 2004. |
| Ignagni et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 12/261,979 entitled “Method of improving sleep disordered breathing,” filed Oct. 30, 2008. |
| Onders et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 12/122,482 entitled “Devices and methods for assessing motor point electromyogram as a biomarker,” filed May 16, 2008. |
| DeCarvalho et al.; Motor neuron disease presenting with respiratory failure; Journal of the Neurological Sciences; vol. 139; No. Suppl.; 1996; pp. 117-122. |
| Stewart et al.; Electromyography of respiratory muscles in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; Journal of the Neurological Sciences; vol. 191; No. 1-2; Oct. 15, 2001; pp. 67-73. |
| Zifko et al.; Central and peripheral respiratory electrophysiological studies in myotonic dystrophy; Brain; vol. 119; 1996; pp. 1911-1922. |
| de Carvalho et al.; Medical technology assessment: Electrodiagnosis in motor neuron diseases and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; Neurophysiol. Clin.; Oct. 2001; 31 (5); pp. 341-348. |
| D'Honneur et al.; Comparison of the effects of mivacurium on the diaphragm and geniohyoid muscles; British Journal of Anesthesia; 77(6); pp. 716-719; Dec. 1996. |
| McGee et al.; A reliable method for monitoring intraabdominal pressure during natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery; Surg Endosc.; 21(4): pp. 672-676; Apr. 2007. |
| Onders, Raymond P.; The Utility of Flexible Endoscopy During Advanced Laparoscopy; Seminars in Laparoscopic Surgery; vol. 10, No. 1; pp. 43-48; Mar. 2003. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20080188867 A1 | Aug 2008 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60899799 | Feb 2007 | US |