Claims
- 1. A method of treating scrap graphite having a metal contaminant adhered thereto to separate the metal from the graphite, which method comprises the steps of:(a) placing scrap graphite having a metal contaminant adhered thereto into a bath comprising an aqueous oxidizing electrolyte, the graphite being contained in one or more baskets having at least a base which has a grill or perforations to allow graphite particles to fall therethrough; (b) applying to the scrap graphite an electric current contact whereby the graphite forms one electrode of an electrolytic cell; (c) providing a second electrode in contact with the electrolyte; and (d) passing an electric current a round the electrical circuit comprising the electric current contact, the scrap graphite, the electrolyte and the second electrode thereby causing the scrap graphite to disintegrate and graphite particles to fall through the grill or perforations.
- 2. A method as in claim 1 wherein the scrap graphite in the bath is partially submerged in the electrolyte and is partially outside the electrolyte and the electric current contact is made to the scrap graphite outside the electrolyte.
- 3. A method as in claim 2 wherein an upper body part of the basket is made of metallic material and is outside the electrolyte and acts as said electric contact to interconnected pieces of graphite in the basket.
- 4. A method as in claim 3 wherein said electric contact is provided by a metal or graphite block in contact with the scrap graphite.
- 5. A method as in claim 4 wherein said electric contact is provided by a metal collar inside the basket in contact with the scrap graphite.
- 6. A method as in claim 2 wherein said second electrode is provided by a metallic wire gauze positioned around the basket or baskets.
- 7. A method as claimed in claim 2 wherein metal contaminated graphite contained in a plurality of the said baskets is treated together in the same bath.
- 8. A method as in claim 2 wherein the electrolyte employed in the bath is circulated in and out of the bath.
- 9. A method as in claim 2 wherein the metal constitutes not more than forty per cent by weight of the scrap.
- 10. A method as in claim 2 wherein the electric current is a directional electric current.
- 11. A method as in claim 2 wherein the electrolyte is a strong acid.
- 12. A method as in claim 2 wherein one or more of the following is applied to assist dissolution of the metal: (a) an elevated electrolyte temperature in the range 30 to 80° C.; (b) mechanical agitation or stirring of the electrolyte; or (c) input of additional energy from another source.
- 13. A method as in claim 2 wherein the mean applied electric current is greater than 10 milliamps per cm2.
- 14. A method as in claim 2 wherein said metal comprises uranium or other actinide.
Priority Claims (1)
Number |
Date |
Country |
Kind |
9217414 |
Aug 1992 |
GB |
|
Parent Case Info
This is a continuation of application Ser. No. 08/105,840, filed Aug. 13, 1993, now abandoned.
US Referenced Citations (8)
Foreign Referenced Citations (5)
Number |
Date |
Country |
0 221 187 |
May 1987 |
EP |
497 835 |
Dec 1938 |
GB |
1273170 |
May 1972 |
GB |
61-201165 |
Sep 1986 |
JP |
3-216599 |
Sep 1991 |
JP |
Non-Patent Literature Citations (1)
Entry |
Palamalai et al., “Development of an Electro-Oxidative Dissolution Technique for Fast Reactor Carbite Fuels” (1991) (Abstract Only). |
Continuations (1)
|
Number |
Date |
Country |
Parent |
08/105840 |
Aug 1993 |
US |
Child |
08/405372 |
|
US |