Waste water production with oil and gas is a challenge for the oil and natural gas industry. During the production of oil and natural gas, the oil and natural gas sometimes also includes water. The water produced through wells can originate from the hydrocarbon bearing zones, from aquifers that are near the hydrocarbon bearing zones, or from water that is injected downhole. Various chemicals are sometimes also mixed with the injection water to improve the reservoir sweep efficiency. When produced at the surface, this mixture of water and at least one of oil or gas can create a concern from an environmental standpoint.
In previous solutions, hydrocarbons and water are produced and separated at the surface. In wells that are drilled in to mature reservoirs, the water-cut can become extremely high, reducing the economic viability of the well, sometimes resulting in abandonment of wells. Other existing solutions include blocking the water encroachment by mechanical means, chemicals, controlled production, or some combination of these approaches. Such solutions, however, often adversely compromise the oil production capacity of wells.
A tool having a downhole conveyance, a first packer, a second packer, a pump, and a first and second sensor. The pump defines a plurality of inlets and an outlet, wherein the plurality of inlets is aligned with a first plurality of holes in the downhole conveyance, and the outlet oriented in a direction longitudinally opposite the first plurality of holes and the second plurality of holes. The second sensor is longitudinally separated further away from the first plurality of holes than the first sensor and configured to activate the pump when a water level is detected. The first sensor is configured to deactivate the pump when the water level is detected.
The details of one or more implementations of the invention are set forth in the accompanying drawings and the description below. Other features, objects, and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the description and drawings, and from the claims.
Like reference symbols in the various drawings indicate like elements.
The present disclosure describes a formation-water removal tool that is operable to remove formation water produced by a one wellbore and inject the formation water into an intersecting wellbore. For example, the tool can inject formation water from a horizontal wellbore into a main wellbore below the location of the horizontal wellbore. The tool, in some aspects, includes tubular conduits affixed to each other and positioned in a wellbore with wellbore seals such as packers. Water from the subterranean zone collects in the annulus formed between tubular conduit and casing and between the wellbore seals. When the water level reaches a predefined level, a pump pumps water from the annulus into the wellbore through holes in the tubular conduit. In doing so, the tool can eliminate, minimize, or otherwise reduce the amount of formation water produced at the surface of the wellbore along with the gas. For example, the tool can be used in a dry gas well and utilize the main wellbore to collect the formation water produced from a horizontally wellbore in the dry gas reservoir. In some instances, the reservoir pressure is above the dew point pressure, which can eliminate or otherwise reduce condensate produced at the surface.
The formation-water removal tool 102, in some aspects, may direct the flow of water into an annulus formed in the wellbore 116. One or more pumps can pump the water from the annulus into a portion of the wellbore below the formation-water removal tool 102. The gas 114 can flow through a separation tubular to the surface. In some instances, the formation-water removal tool 102 can produce the gas 114 at the surface independent of pumps at the surface which are typically needed for water separation.
As illustrated in
In some implementations, the wellbore system 100 may be deployed on a body of water rather than the terranean surface. For instance, in some implementations, the terranean surface may be an ocean, gulf, sea, or any other body of water under which hydrocarbon-bearing formations may be found. In short, reference to the terranean surface includes both land and water surfaces and contemplates forming and developing one or more wellbore systems 100 from either or both locations.
In some aspects, the downhole conveyance 118 may be a tubular production string made up of multiple tubing joints. For example, a tubular production string (also known as a production casing) typically consists of sections of steel pipe, which are threaded so that they can interlock together. In alternative aspects, the downhole conveyance 118 may be coiled tubing. Further, in some cases, a wireline or slickline conveyance (not shown) may be communicably coupled to the formation-water removal tool 102.
In some implementations of the wellbore system 100, the wellbore 116 may be cased with one or more casings such as casing 120. In some implementations, the wellbore 116 may be offset from vertical (for example, a slant wellbore). Even further, in some implementations, the wellbore 116 may be a stepped wellbore, such that a portion is drilled vertically downward and then curved to a substantially horizontal wellbore portion. Additional substantially vertical and horizontal wellbore portions may be added according to, for example, the type of terranean surface 102, the depth of one or more target subterranean formations, the depth of one or more productive subterranean formations, or other criteria. For example, a horizontal well that intersects the main wellbore 116 can produce the water and gas 104.
In the illustrated implementation, the formation-water removal tool 102 includes the tubing 118, an electric submersible pump (ESP) 122, a lower sensor 124a, an upper sensor 124b, a lower seal 128a, and an upper seal 128b. The tubing 118 includes lower openings 126a vertically lower than upper openings 126b. In some implementations, the lower openings 126a, the upper openings 126b, or both can be holes, slots, other appropriates shapes, or a combination thereof without departing from the scope of the disclosure. In addition, the lower openings 126a, upper openings 126b, or both can be arranged randomly, in a pattern, or a combination of both. In some implementations, the ESP 122 includes one or more inlets, and the lower openings 126a can be aligned with the one or more inlets of the ESP 122. The upper openings 126b form a passage for the gas 114 to flow into the tubing 118 and then the terranean surface. The ESP 122 can inject the formation water 112 into the main wellbore 116 intermittently or continuously. In regards to intermittent rates, the volume of injected water can be based on the largest possible caging size, the smallest possible production tubing size, the maximum possible separation between the two sensors, as well as other appropriate parameters.
The lower seal 128a and the upper seal 128b are configured to form a seal between the tubing 118 and the casing 120. In some implementations, the lower seal 128a and the upper seal 128b are packers such as inflatable packers or mechanical packers. In some implementations, the lower packer 128a and the upper packer 128b can be separated by 50 feet (ft), 100 ft, 150 ft, or greater. When sealed, the lower seal 128a, the upper seal 128b, the tubing 118, and the casing 120 can, in some implementations, form an annulus that functions as a receptacle for the formation water 112.
The lower sensor 124a and the upper sensor 124b detect the water level and turn the ESP 122 on and off. The lower sensor 124a is positioned above the lower openings 126a to shut off the ESP 122 before the water level is below the lower openings. This standoff distance assist in preventing gas from leaking into the pump intake or opening 126a The upper sensor 124b is located below opening to the gas zone 108 to turn on the ESP 122 before the water level rises above the lip of the opening In some implementations, the lower sensor 124a and the upper sensor 124b detects a water level when an object floating on a surface of the formation water 112 contacts either the lower sensor 124a or the upper sensor 124b. For example, when the upper sensor 124b detects contact with the floating object, the upper sensor 124b signals the ESP 122 to turn on. When the lower sensor 124a detects contact with the floating object, the lower sensor 124a signals the ESP 122 to turn off. In doing so, the formation-water removal tool 102 can prevent or otherwise reduce the production of formation water 112 at the surface and gas 114 passing to the main wellbore 116.
At step 202, a location of an opening to a horizontal wellbore is determined. As previously mentioned, a horizontal wellbore may drilled off the main wellbore and, in this case, the opening distance from the terranean surface is known. Other appropriate techniques can be used to determine the opening location without departing from the scope of the disclosure.
At step 204, the formation-water removal tool is positioned with the upper packer above the opening and the lower packer below the opening. In
At steps 206 and 208, the upper packer and the lower packer are inflated, respectively, when the upper sensor is at or below the lower lip of the opening. Inflating the upper packer 128b above the opening and lower packer 128a below the opening forms an annulus where formation water can be collected and pumped into the lower portion of the main wellbore 116. In addition, the location of the upper sensor 124a at or below the bottom lip can prevent or reduce formation water 112 from returning through the opening and interfering with gas production.
If the water level is detected at the upper sensor at decisional step 210, then, at step 212, the water pump is turned on. If not, the method 200 returns to the decisional step 210. In regards to
If the water level is detected at the lower sensor at decisional step 214, then, at step 216, the water pump is turned on. If not, the method 200 returns to the decisional step 214. In regards to
A number of implementations of the invention have been described. Nevertheless, it will be understood that various modifications may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, other implementations are within the scope of the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2519116 | Crake | Aug 1950 | A |
2671510 | Slick et al. | Mar 1954 | A |
2696259 | Greene | Dec 1954 | A |
2804148 | Schremp et al. | Aug 1957 | A |
3018828 | Prentiss | Jan 1962 | A |
3055424 | Allen | Sep 1962 | A |
3354955 | Berry | Nov 1967 | A |
3419080 | Lebourg | Dec 1968 | A |
3438204 | Cleary | Apr 1969 | A |
3495612 | Learn | Feb 1970 | A |
4074763 | Stevens | Feb 1978 | A |
4349047 | Ditto | Sep 1982 | A |
4462714 | Smith et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
4766957 | McIntyre | Aug 1988 | A |
5335732 | McIntyre | Aug 1994 | A |
5833001 | Song et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
6102120 | Chen | Aug 2000 | A |
6131655 | Shaw | Oct 2000 | A |
6253850 | Nazzai et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6336504 | Alhanati et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6415864 | Ramakrishnan | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6719048 | Ramos et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6755250 | Hall et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6860329 | Oosterling | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6923275 | Gardes | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7370701 | Suijaatmadja et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7708081 | Bosma et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
8196651 | Murphy | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8528632 | Mack | Sep 2013 | B2 |
10087708 | Al-Gouhi | Oct 2018 | B2 |
20030168211 | Arnaud | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20050199401 | Patel | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050252689 | Gardes | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20070137826 | Bosma | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070260439 | Keller | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080060813 | Badalamenti et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20090178809 | Keller | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090183875 | Rayssiguier et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20100284828 | Woie et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20120055667 | Ingram | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20130153207 | Lauderdale | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20150267501 | Al-Gouhi | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20160084059 | Moore et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160177659 | Voll | Jun 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2251011 | Jun 1992 | GB |
2411918 | Sep 2005 | GB |
WO1999015755 | Apr 1999 | WO |
WO2002099247 | Dec 2002 | WO |
WO2010127240 | Nov 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Appln. No. PCT/US2019/039819, dated Oct. 14, 2019, 17 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Application No. PCT/US2017/051272, dated Nov. 24, 2017, 12 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2015/021680, dated Sep. 11, 2015, 11 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200003035 A1 | Jan 2020 | US |