Renal neuromodulation for treatment of human patients

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10111707
  • Patent Number
    10,111,707
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, June 15, 2017
    7 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 30, 2018
    6 years ago
Abstract
Methods and apparatus are provided for monopolar neuromodulation, e.g., via a pulsed electric field. Such monopolar neuromodulation may effectuate irreversible electroporation or electrofusion, necrosis and/or inducement of apoptosis, alteration of gene expression, action potential attenuation or blockade, changes in cytokine up-regulation and other conditions in target neural fibers. In some embodiments, monopolar neuromodulation is applied to neural fibers that contribute to renal function. In some embodiments, such monopolar neuromodulation is performed bilaterally.
Description
INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE

All publications and patent applications mentioned in this specification are herein incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each individual publication or patent application was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference.


TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention relates to methods and apparatus for neuromodulation. In some embodiments, the present invention relates to methods and apparatus for achieving monopolar renal neuromodulation.


BACKGROUND

Congestive Heart Failure (“CHF”) is a condition that occurs when the heart becomes damaged and reduces blood flow to the organs of the body. If blood flow decreases sufficiently, kidney function becomes altered, which results in fluid retention, abnormal hormone secretions and increased constriction of blood vessels. These results increase the workload of the heart and further decrease the capacity of the heart to pump blood through the kidneys and circulatory system.


It is believed that progressively decreasing perfusion of the kidneys is a principal non-cardiac cause perpetuating the downward spiral of CHF. Moreover, the fluid overload and associated clinical symptoms resulting from these physiologic changes result in additional hospital admissions, poor quality of life and additional costs to the health care system.


In addition to their role in the progression of CHF, the kidneys play a significant role in the progression of Chronic Renal Failure (“CRF”), End-Stage Renal Disease (“ESRD”), hypertension (pathologically high blood pressure) and other cardio-renal diseases. The functions of the kidneys can be summarized under three broad categories: filtering blood and excreting waste products generated by the body's metabolism; regulating salt, water, electrolyte and acid-base balance; and secreting hormones to maintain vital organ blood flow. Without properly functioning kidneys, a patient will suffer water retention, reduced urine flow and an accumulation of waste toxins in the blood and body. These conditions result from reduced renal function or renal failure (kidney failure) and are believed to increase the workload of the heart. In a CHF patient, renal failure will cause the heart to further deteriorate as fluids are retained and blood toxins accumulate due to the poorly functioning kidneys.


It has been established in animal models that the heart failure condition results in abnormally high sympathetic activation of the kidneys. An increase in renal sympathetic nerve activity leads to decreased removal of water and sodium from the body, as well as increased renin secretion. Increased renin secretion leads to vasoconstriction of blood vessels supplying the kidneys which causes decreased renal blood flow. Reduction of sympathetic renal nerve activity, e.g., via denervation, may reverse these processes.


Applicants have previously described methods and apparatus for treating renal disorders by applying a pulsed electric field to neural fibers that contribute to renal function. See, for example, Applicants' co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/129,765, filed on May 13, 2005, and Ser. No. 11/189,563, filed on Jul. 25, 2005, both of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties. A pulsed electric field (“PEF”) may initiate renal neuromodulation, e.g., denervation, for example, via irreversible electroporation or via electrofusion. The PEF may be delivered from apparatus positioned intravascularly, extravascularly, intra-to-extravascularly or a combination thereof. Additional methods and apparatus for achieving renal neuromodulation, e.g., via localized drug delivery (such as by a drug pump or infusion catheter) or via use of a stimulation electric field, etc, are described, for example, in co-owned and co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/408,665, filed Apr. 8, 2003, and U.S. Pat. No. 6,978,174, both of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.


Electrofusion generally refers to the fusion of neighboring cells induced by exposure to an electric field. Contact between target neighboring cells for the purposes of electrofusion may be achieved in a variety of ways, including, for example, via dielectrophoresis. In tissue, the target cells may already be in contact, thus facilitating electrofusion.


Electroporation and electropermeabilization generally refer to methods of manipulating the cell membrane or intracellular apparatus. For example, the porosity of a cell membrane may be increased by inducing a sufficient voltage across the cell membrane through, e.g., short, high-voltage pulses. The extent of porosity in the cell membrane (e.g., size and number of pores) and the duration of effect (e.g., temporary or permanent) are a function of multiple variables, such as field strength, pulse width, duty cycle, electric field orientation, cell type or size and/or other parameters.


Cell membrane pores will generally close spontaneously upon termination of relatively lower strength electric fields or relatively shorter pulse widths (herein defined as “reversible electroporation”). However, each cell or cell type has a critical threshold above which pores do not close such that pore formation is no longer reversible; this result is defined as “irreversible electroporation,” “irreversible breakdown” or “irreversible damage.” At this point, the cell membrane ruptures and/or irreversible chemical imbalances caused by the high porosity occur. Such high porosity can be the result of a single large hole and/or a plurality of smaller holes.


A potential challenge of using intravascular PEF systems for treating renal disorders is to selectively electroporate target cells without affecting other cells. For example, it may be desirable to irreversibly electroporate renal nerve cells that travel along or in proximity to renal vasculature, but it may not be desirable to damage the smooth muscle cells of which the vasculature is composed. As a result, an overly aggressive course of PEF therapy may persistently injure the renal vasculature, but an overly conservative course of PEF therapy may not achieve the desired renal neuromodulation.


Applicants have previously described methods and apparatus for monitoring tissue impedance or conductivity to determine the effects of pulsed electric field therapy, e.g., to determine an extent of electroporation and/or its degree of irreversibility. See, for example, Applicant's co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/233,814, filed Sep. 23, 2005, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. Pulsed electric field electroporation of tissue causes a decrease in tissue impedance and an increase in tissue conductivity. If induced electroporation is reversible, tissue impedance and conductivity should approximate baseline levels upon cessation of the pulsed electric field. However, if electroporation is irreversible, impedance and conductivity changes should persist after terminating the pulsed electric field. Thus, monitoring the impedance or conductivity of target and/or non-target tissue may be utilized to determine the onset of electroporation and to determine the type or extent of electroporation. Furthermore, monitoring data may be used in one or more manual or automatic feedback loops to control the electroporation.


In view of the foregoing, it would be desirable to provide additional methods and apparatus for achieving renal neuromodulation.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Several embodiments of the present invention will be apparent upon consideration of the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which like reference characters refer to like parts throughout, and in which:



FIG. 1 is a schematic view illustrating human renal anatomy.



FIG. 2 is a schematic isometric detail view showing the location of the renal nerves relative to the renal artery.



FIGS. 3A and 3B are schematic isometric and end views, respectively, illustrating orienting of an electric field for selectively affecting renal nerves.



FIG. 4 is a schematic side view, partially in section, illustrating an example of a monopolar extravascular method and apparatus for renal neuromodulation.



FIG. 5 is a schematic side view, partially in section, illustrating an example of a monopolar intra-to-extravascular method and apparatus for renal neuromodulation.



FIGS. 6A and 6B are schematic side views, partially in section, illustrating examples of monopolar intravascular methods and apparatus for renal neuromodulation.



FIGS. 7A-7D are schematic side views, partially in section, illustrating examples of monopolar intravascular methods and apparatus for renal neuromodulation comprising centering elements.



FIG. 8 is a schematic side view, partially in section, illustrating a method for multi-location monopolar renal neuromodulation.



FIG. 9 is a schematic side view, partially in section, illustrating an example of a monopolar intravascular method and apparatus for renal neuromodulation having one or more electrodes that contact the vessel wall.



FIG. 10 is a schematic side view, partially in section, illustrating another example of a monopolar intravascular method and apparatus for renal neuromodulation having one or more electrodes that contact the vessel wall



FIG. 11 is a schematic side view, partially in section, of a method for achieving monopolar bilateral renal neuromodulation, illustratively utilizing the apparatus of FIG. 6A.



FIG. 12 is a schematic side view, partially in section, illustrating an alternative method and apparatus for achieving monopolar bilateral renal neuromodulation.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

A. Overview


Several embodiments of the present invention are methods and apparatus for neuromodulation via a pulsed electric field (“PEF”), a stimulation electric field, localized drug delivery, high frequency ultrasound, thermal techniques, athermal techniques, combinations thereof, and/or other techniques. In some embodiments, neuromodulation is achieved via monopolar (e.g., unipolar) methods and apparatus. Such neuromodulation may, for example, effectuate irreversible electroporation or electrofusion, necrosis and/or inducement of apoptosis, alteration of gene expression, action potential blockade or attenuation, changes in cytokine up-regulation and other conditions in target neural fibers.


In some patients, when the monopolar neuromodulatory methods and apparatus of the present invention are applied to renal nerves and/or other neural fibers that contribute to renal neural functions, applicants believe that the neuromodulatory effects induced by the neuromodulation might result in increased urine output, decreased plasma renin levels, decreased tissue (e.g., kidney) and/or urine catecholamines (e.g., norepinephrine), increased urinary sodium excretion, and/or controlled blood pressure. Furthermore, applicants believe that these or other changes might prevent or treat congestive heart failure, hypertension, acute myocardial infarction, end-stage renal disease, contrast nephropathy, other renal system diseases, and/or other renal or cardio-renal anomalies. The methods and apparatus described herein may be used to modulate efferent or afferent nerve signals, as well as combinations of efferent and afferent nerve signals.


Renal neuromodulation preferably is performed in a bilateral fashion such that neural fibers contributing to renal function of both the right and left kidneys are modulated. Bilateral monopolar renal neuromodulation may provide enhanced therapeutic effect in some patients as compared to renal neuromodulation performed unilaterally, i.e. as compared to renal neuromodulation performed on neural tissue innervating a single kidney. In some embodiments, concurrent modulation of neural fibers that contribute to both right and left renal function may be achieved, or in other embodiments modulation of the right and left neural fibers may be sequential. Bilateral renal neuromodulation may be continuous or intermittent, as desired.


When utilizing an electric field, the electric field parameters may be altered and combined in any suitable combination. Such parameters can include, but are not limited to, voltage, field strength, frequency, pulse width, pulse duration, the shape of the pulse, the number of pulses and/or the interval between pulses (e.g., duty cycle), etc. For example, when utilizing a pulsed electric field, suitable field strengths can be up to about 10,000 V/cm and suitable pulse widths can be up to about 1 second. Suitable shapes of the pulse waveform include, for example, AC waveforms, sinusoidal waves, cosine waves, combinations of sine and cosine waves, DC waveforms, DC-shifted AC waveforms, RF waveforms, square waves, trapezoidal waves, exponentially-decaying waves, or combinations. The field includes at least one pulse, and in many applications the field includes a plurality of pulses. Suitable pulse intervals include, for example, intervals less than about 10 seconds. These parameters are provided as suitable examples and in no way should be considered limiting.


As discussed, the methods and apparatus of the present invention may be used to modulate neural fibers that contribute to renal function and may exploit any suitable neuromodulatory techniques that will achieve the desired neuromodulation. For example, any suitable electrical signal or field parameters, such as any electric field that will achieve the desired neuromodulation (e.g., electroporative effect), may be utilized. In some embodiments, the present invention provides methods and apparatus for achieving bilateral renal neuromodulation. To better understand the structures of devices of the present invention and the methods of using such devices for renal neuromodulation, it is instructive to examine the renal anatomy in humans.


B. Selected Embodiments of Methods for Neuromodulation


With reference now to FIG. 1, the human renal anatomy includes kidneys K that are supplied with oxygenated blood by renal arteries RA, which are connected to the heart by the abdominal aorta AA. Deoxygenated blood flows from the kidneys to the heart via renal veins RV and the inferior vena cava IVC. FIG. 2 illustrates a portion of the renal anatomy in greater detail. More specifically, the renal anatomy also includes renal nerves RN extending longitudinally along the lengthwise dimension L of renal artery RA generally within the adventitia of the artery. The renal artery RA has smooth muscle cells SMC that surround the arterial circumference and spiral around the angular axis θ of the artery. The smooth muscle cells of the renal artery accordingly have a lengthwise or longer dimension extending transverse (i.e., non-parallel) to the lengthwise dimension of the renal artery. The misalignment of the lengthwise dimensions of the renal nerves and the smooth muscle cells is defined as “cellular misalignment.”


Referring to FIGS. 3A and 3B, the cellular misalignment of the renal nerves and the smooth muscle cells may be exploited to selectively affect renal nerve cells with reduced effect on smooth muscle cells. More specifically, because larger cells require a lower electric field strength to exceed the cell membrane irreversibility threshold voltage or energy for irreversible electroporation, embodiments of the present invention may be configured to align at least a portion of an electric field with or near the longer dimensions of the cells to be affected. In specific embodiments, the device has a monopolar electrode configured to create an electrical field aligned with or near the lengthwise dimension L of the renal artery RA to affect renal nerves RN. By aligning an electric field so that the field preferentially aligns with the lengthwise aspect of the cell rather than the diametric or radial aspect of the cell, lower field strengths may be used to affect target neural cells, e.g., to necrose or fuse the target cells, to induce apoptosis, to alter gene expression, to attenuate or block action potentials, to change cytokine up-regulation and/or to induce other suitable processes. This is expected to reduce total energy delivered to the system and to mitigate effects on non-target cells in the electric field.


Similarly, the lengthwise or longer dimensions of tissues overlying or underlying the target nerve are orthogonal or otherwise off-axis (e.g., transverse) with respect to the longer dimensions of the nerve cells. Thus, in addition to aligning a pulsed electric field (“PEF”) with the lengthwise or longer dimensions of the target cells, the PEF may propagate along the lateral or shorter dimensions of the non-target cells (i.e., such that the PEF propagates at least partially out of alignment with non-target smooth muscle cells SMC). Therefore, as seen in FIGS. 3A and 3B, applying a PEF with propagation lines Li generally aligned with the longitudinal dimension L of the renal artery RA is expected to preferentially cause electroporation (e.g., irreversible electroporation), electrofusion or other neuromodulation in cells of the target renal nerves RN without unduly affecting the non-target arterial smooth muscle cells SMC. The pulsed electric field may propagate in a single plane along the longitudinal axis of the renal artery, or may propagate in the longitudinal direction along any angular segment θ through a range of 0°-360°.


A PEF system placed within and/or in proximity to the wall of the renal artery may propagate an electric field having a longitudinal portion that is aligned to run with the longitudinal dimension of the artery in the region of the renal nerves RN and the smooth muscle cells SMC of the vessel wall so that the wall of the artery remains at least substantially intact while the outer nerve cells are destroyed, fused or otherwise affected. Monitoring elements optionally may be utilized to assess an extent of, e.g., electroporation, induced in renal nerves and/or in smooth muscle cells, as well as to adjust PEF parameters to achieve a desired effect.


C. Embodiments of Systems and Methods for Neuromodulation


With reference to FIGS. 4-10, examples of monopolar PEF systems and methods are described. FIG. 4 shows one embodiment of an extravascular, monopolar pulsed electric field apparatus 200 that includes one or more electrodes configured to deliver a monopolar pulsed electric field to renal neural fibers to achieve renal neuromodulation. The apparatus of FIG. 4 is configured for temporary extravascular placement; however, it should be understood that partially or completely implantable extravascular apparatus additionally or alternatively may be utilized. Applicants have previously described extravascular PEF systems, for example, in co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/189,563, filed Jul. 25, 2005, which has been incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.


Apparatus 200 of FIG. 4 comprises a laparoscopic or percutaneous PEF system having a probe 210 configured for insertion in proximity to the track of the renal neural supply. For example, the probe 210 can be configured to be placed along the renal artery or vein, the hilum, and/or within Gerota's fascia under CT, radiographic, ultrasonic, or other suitable guidance. The proximal section of the probe 210 generally has an electrical connector to couple the probe to a pulse generator 100, and the distal section has at least one electrode 212.


The pulsed electric field generator 100 is located external to the patient, and the electrode(s) 212 are electrically coupled to the generator via the probe 210 and wires 211. The generator 100, as well as any of the electrode embodiments described herein, may be utilized with any embodiment of the present invention described hereinafter for delivery of a PEF with desired field parameters. It should be understood that electrodes of embodiments described hereinafter may be electronically connected to the generator even if the generator is not explicitly shown or described with each embodiment.


The electrode(s) 212 can be individual electrodes, a common but segmented electrode, or a common and continuous electrode. A common but segmented electrode may be formed by providing a slotted tube fitted onto the probe, or by electrically connecting a series of individual electrodes. Individual electrodes or groups of electrodes 212 may be configured to provide a monopolar or bipolar signal. The electrodes 212 may be dynamically assignable to facilitate monopolar and/or bipolar energy delivery between/among any of the electrodes on the probe 210 and/or an external ground pad 150. The ground pad 150, for example, may be attached externally to the patient's skin (e.g., to the patient's leg, flank, back or side). Additionally or alternatively, the ground pad 150 may be attached externally to the patient adjacent to the targeted kidney to induce desired directionality in the monopolar electrical field.


As seen in FIG. 4, the electrode 212 may comprise a single electrode that is used in conjunction with a separate ground pad 150 located on the exterior of the patient and coupled to the generator 100 for monopolar use. The probe 210 optionally may comprise a conductive material that is insulated in regions other than its distal tip to form a distal tip electrode 212. Alternatively, the electrode 212 may be delivered through a lumen of the probe 210. The probe 210 and the electrode 212 may be of the standard needle or trocar-type used clinically for pulsed RF nerve block. Alternatively, the apparatus 200 may comprise a flexible and/or custom-designed probe for the renal application described herein.


In FIG. 4, the percutaneous probe 210 has been advanced through a percutaneous access site P into proximity within renal artery RA. Once properly positioned, a pulsed electric field F0 may be applied to target neural fibers across the monopolar electrode 212 and the ground pad 150. The pulsed electric field F0 shown in FIG. 4 is generally aligned with the longitudinal dimension of the neural fibers along the renal artery RA that control the kidney K to preferentially modulate the neural fibers without unduly affecting the smooth muscle cells of the renal artery RA. The monopolar electric field F0, however, can be orientated differently relative to the renal artery RA in other embodiments. After treatment, the apparatus 200 may be removed from the patient to conclude the procedure.


It is expected that applying a monopolar field between the electrode 212 and the ground pad 150 may modulate the function of the target neural fibers in a manner that at least partially denervates the patient's kidney. The neural modulation may be achieved thermally or substantially athermally. Such PEF therapy may alleviate clinical symptoms of CHF, hypertension, renal disease, myocardial infarction, contrast nephropathy and/or other renal or cardio-renal diseases for a period of months (e.g., potentially up to six months or more). This time period may be sufficient to allow the body to heal to potentially reduce the risk of CHF onset after an acute myocardial infarction and mitigate the need for subsequent re-treatment. Alternatively, as symptoms reoccur, or at regularly scheduled intervals, the patient can return to the physician for a repeat therapy.


The effectiveness of the initial therapy, and thus the potential need for repeating the therapy, can be evaluated by monitoring several different physiologic parameters. For example, plasma renin levels, urine catecholamines, or other neurohormones that are indicative of increased sympathetic nervous activity can provide an indication of the extent of denervation. Additionally or alternatively, a nuclear imaging test, such as a test utilizing 131-Iodine metaiodobenzylguanidine (“MIBG”), may be performed to measure a degree of adrenergic innervation. As another option, imaging may be performed with Technetium-99m mercaptoacetylglycine (“Tc-99m MAG3”) to evaluate renal function. Alternatively, provocative maneuvers known to increase sympathetic nervous activity, such as head-out water immersion testing, may be conducted to determine the need for repeat therapy.


In some embodiments, the apparatus 200 may comprise a probe having an introducer with an expandable distal segment having one or more electrodes. After insertion in proximity to target neural fibers, the distal segment may be opened or expanded into an expanded configuration. In one embodiment, this expanded configuration would follow a contour of the renal artery and/or vein to treat a number of neural fibers with a single application of PEF therapy. For example, in the expanded configuration, the distal segment may partially or completely encircle the renal artery and/or vein. In another embodiment, the expanded configuration may facilitate mechanical dissection, for example, to expand Gerota's fascia and create a working space for placement of the electrodes and/or for delivery of PEF therapy. The distal segment optionally may be translated independently of the probe or introducer.


When utilized as an electrode, the distal segment may, for example, be extended out of an introducer placed near the treatment area. The conducting distal segment may be advanced out of the sheath until a desired amount of renal neural tissue is in proximity to the distal segment, and then PEF therapy may be delivered via the distal segment electrode. Alternatively, the conducting distal segment may be allowed to reform or expand into a spiral of one or more loops, a random space-occupying shape, or another suitable configuration. Mesh, braid, or conductive gels or liquids could be employed in a similar manner.



FIG. 5 schematically illustrates a monopolar intra-to-extravascular (ITEV) PEF system 300 having electrode(s) that are initially delivered endoluminally in a retracted configuration (not shown) to an intravascular position near target neural fibers for modulating renal function. The distal portions of the electrodes then pierce through/across the vessel wall to an extravascular position prior to delivery of the PEF therapy. Intra-to-extravascular positioning of the electrode(s) may place the electrode(s) in closer proximity to target neural fibers during the PEF therapy compared to fully intravascular positioning of the electrode(s). Applicants have previously described intra-to-extravascular PEF systems, for example, in co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/324,188, filed Dec. 29, 2005, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.


The example of the monopolar ITEV PEF system 300 shown in FIG. 5 comprises a catheter 310 having an expandable element 312 with one or more needle-like ITEV electrodes 314 coupled to the expandable element. When multiple needle electrodes 314 are provided, they may be spaced circumferentially and/or longitudinally about/along the expandable element 312. The system 300 further comprises the previously described ground pad 150, which may be attached to or otherwise placed against the skin S of the patient along the exterior of the patient (e.g., to the patient's flank, back, thigh or side). The ground pad 150 is also coupled to the PEF generator 100 as a return electrode (see FIG. 4). The ground pad 150 optionally may be positioned substantially directly lateral to the ITEV electrode(s) 314 to direct the PEF therapy along the patient's vasculature (e.g., along renal artery RA).


The expandable element 312 comprises a member or structure configured for intravascular delivery to (and retrieval from) a target location in a low profile configuration and for expansion to an expanded deployed configuration at the target location. The expandable element 312 may comprise, for example, an inflatable balloon, an expandable basket or cage, or some other expandable structure. As seen in FIG. 5, expansion of the expandable element 312 causes the ITEV electrode(s) 314 to pierce the wall of renal artery RA and move from an intravascular location to an extravascular location. With the ITEV electrode(s) 314 positioned extravascularly and coupled to the PEF generator 100, the ITEV electrode(s) may be energized (e.g., one at a time or all together) as active electrodes in a monopolar PEF therapy with the external ground pad 150 serving as the return electrode. Additionally or alternatively, bipolar PEF therapy may be delivered between any pair of the ITEV electrodes 314 in conjunction with or in lieu of monopolar therapy.


With reference now to FIGS. 6A and 6B, in addition to monopolar extravascular and monopolar ITEV PEF systems, another example of the invention is a monopolar intravascular PEF system 400. Applicants have previously described intravascular PEF systems, for example, in co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/129,765, filed May 13, 2005, which has been incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.


The monopolar intravascular PEF system 400 of FIG. 6A comprises a catheter 410 having a monopolar electrode 412 coupled to the shaft of the catheter. The catheter 410 comprises a guide wire lumen for endoluminally advancing the system 400 to a desired intravascular position over a guide wire G (e.g., to a position within a patient's renal artery RA). The electrode 412 may or may not contact the wall of the artery during PEF therapy. The electrode 412 preferably is fabricated from platinum or another material that exhibits relatively high conductivity and radiopacity.


The system 400 further comprises the previously described external ground pad 150, which may be coupled to the PEF generator 100 (FIG. 4) and electrically coupled to the skin S of the patient along the exterior of the patient (e.g., to the patient's flank, back or thigh). As with previous embodiments, the ground pad 150 optionally may be positioned substantially directly lateral to the monopolar electrode 412 to direct the PEF therapy along the patient's vasculature (e.g., the renal artery RA) and/or through the patient's kidney. Such lateral positioning of the ground pad also may provide a relatively uniform distribution of energy about the circumference of the patient's renal artery RA.



FIG. 6B illustrates an alternative embodiment of system 400 comprising a plurality of the electrodes 412 coupled to the shaft of the catheter 410. Providing a plurality of the electrodes may facilitate the monopolar PEF treatment at multiple intravascular locations without necessitating repositioning of the catheter 410. The electrodes may be selectively energized as monopolar (i.e., active) electrodes in any order or combination as desired. In one example, the electrodes may be individually activated in sequence from proximal to distal. In another example, the electrodes may be individually activated in sequence from distal to proximal. In another example, some electrodes are not activated at all. In yet another example, one or more electrodes are activated in combination with one or more other electrodes. In still another example, the electrodes are activated in a pre-determined sequence or in a random sequence. Additional activation protocols will be apparent to those of skill in the art.


In addition or as an alternative to their use in monopolar treatment, the plurality of the electrodes 412 of FIG. 6B optionally may be used for a bipolar PEF treatment. Such a bipolar PEF treatment may be delivered across any pair or pairs of the electrodes 412, as desired. A combination bipolar and monopolar PEF treatment may be more effective than stand-alone bipolar and/or stand-alone monopolar treatment for some patients or for some indications.


Referring to FIGS. 7A-7D, embodiments of the intravascular monopolar PEF system 400 optionally may comprise one or more centering elements for centering the monopolar electrode(s) within the patient's vasculature. The centering element(s) may be partially expanded such that they partially center the monopolar electrode(s) within the vessel, or may be fully expanded as in FIGS. 7A-7D, such that they substantially fully center the electrode(s) within the vessel. The centering elements 420 may, for example, comprise inflatable balloons and/or expandable wire baskets or cages.


The centering element optionally may comprise an impedance-altering element configured to alter impedance within the patient's vasculature to better direct an applied electric field across the vessel wall to target neural fibers. When the centering element is a balloon, it may temporarily block blood flow and thereby alter the impedance within the patient's vessel. Additionally or alternatively, the centering element may comprise the monopolar electrode. In one embodiment, a balloon centering element comprises a conductive exterior and/or is fabricated from a conductive polymer and is used as the monopolar electrode.


In FIG. 7A, the PEF system 400 comprises an expandable centering element 420 coupled to the catheter 410. The element 420 is configured for delivery and retrieval from a treatment site in a reduced profile delivery configuration, and for expansion at the treatment site to the deployed configuration of FIG. 7A. With the centering element in the fully expanded, deployed configuration of FIG. 7A, the monopolar electrode(s) 412 are substantially centered within the vessel during the PEF therapy.


In the embodiment of FIG. 7A, the system 400 comprises a unitary monopolar electrode 412 positioned along the shaft of the catheter 410 proximal of the centering element 420. The centering element is accordingly positioned between the monopolar electrode 412 and the ground pad 150 in this embodiment. In the embodiment of FIG. 7B, the monopolar electrode 412 is positioned distal of the centering element such that the centering element is not positioned between the monopolar electrode and the ground pad. In the embodiment of FIG. 7C, the monopolar electrode 412 is positioned in line with the centering element 420 along the shaft of the catheter 410. In the embodiment of FIG. 7D, the monopolar electrode 412 is positioned between first and second centering elements 420a and 420b, respectively. As will be apparent, additional monopolar and/or bipolar electrodes may be provided with any of the embodiments of the system 400 of FIGS. 7A-7D at any desired position(s) along the catheter 410. Furthermore, one or more electrodes may be coupled to the centering element(s) 420 such that the electrodes contact the wall of the patient's vasculature during delivery of the PEF therapy.


As discussed previously, it is expected that the monopolar PEF therapy, whether delivered extravascularly, intravascularly, intra-to-extravascularly or a combination thereof, may effectuate the following: irreversible electroporation or electrofusion; necrosis and/or inducement of apoptosis; alteration of gene expression; action potential blockade or attenuation; changes in cytokine up-regulation; and other conditions in target neural fibers. In some patients, when such neuromodulatory methods and apparatus are applied to renal nerves and/or other neural fibers that contribute to renal neural functions, applicants believe that the neuromodulatory effects induced by the neuromodulation might result in at least partial denervation of the patient's kidney(s). This may result in increased urine output, decreased plasma renin levels, decreased tissue (e.g., kidney) and/or urine catecholamines (e.g., norepinephrine), increased urinary sodium excretion, and/or controlled blood pressure. Furthermore, applicants believe that these or other changes might prevent or treat congestive heart failure, hypertension, myocardial infarction, renal disease, contrast nephropathy, other renal system diseases, and/or other renal or cardio-renal anomalies for a period of months (e.g., potentially up to six months or more).


The methods and apparatus described herein could be used to modulate efferent or afferent nerve signals, as well as combinations of efferent and afferent nerve signals. Neuromodulation in accordance with the present invention preferably is achieved without completely physically severing, i.e., without fully cutting, the target neural fibers. However, it should be understood that such neuromodulation may functionally sever the neural fibers even though the fibers may not be completely physically severed. Apparatus and methods described herein illustratively are configured for percutaneous use. Such percutaneous use may be endoluminal, laparoscopic, a combination thereof, etc.


The apparatus described herein additionally may be used to quantify the efficacy, extent or cell selectivity of PEF therapy to monitor and/or control the therapy. When a pulsed electric field initiates electroporation, the impedance of the electroporated tissue begins to decrease and the conductivity of the tissue begins to increase. If the electroporation is reversible, the tissue electrical parameters will return or approximate baseline values upon cessation of the PEF. However, if the electroporation is irreversible, the changes in tissue parameters will persist after termination of the PEF. These phenomena may be utilized to monitor both the onset and the effects of PEF therapy. For example, electroporation may be monitored directly using, for example, conductivity measurements or impedance measurements, such as Electrical Impedance Tomography (“EIT”) and/or other electrical impedance/conductivity measurements like an electrical impedance or conductivity index. Such electroporation monitoring data optionally may be used in one or more feedback loops to control delivery of PEF therapy.


In order to collect the desired monitoring data, additional monitoring electrodes optionally may be provided in proximity to the monitored tissue. The distance between such monitoring electrodes preferably would be specified prior to therapy delivery and used to determine conductivity from impedance or conductance measurements. For the purposes of the present invention, the imaginary part of impedance may be ignored such that impedance is defined as voltage divided by current, while conductance may be defined as the inverse of impedance (i.e., current divided by voltage), and conductivity may be defined as conductance per unit distance. Applicants have previously described methods and apparatus for monitoring PEF therapy and have provided illustrative PEF waveforms, for example, in co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/233,814, filed Sep. 23, 2005, which has been incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.


With reference now to FIG. 8, a method for multi-location, monopolar renal neuromodulation is described. In this embodiment, monopolar renal neuromodulation may be performed at a plurality of treatment sites T positioned along the length of renal artery RA. Such multi-location treatment may be achieved utilizing one or more monopolar electrodes positioned intravascularly, intra-to-extravascularly, extravascularly, etc. In FIG. 8, the multi-location treatment is performed with substantially uniform circumferential energy delivery about the renal artery RA. However, it should be understood that non-uniform circumferential energy delivery alternatively may be utilized. For example, in some embodiments the monopolar electrode(s) may contact the vessel wall and may preferentially deliver energy to target neural fibers located in proximity to the contacted side of the wall.


In one embodiment, the catheter 410 of the PEF system 400 of FIG. 6A is repositioned along the renal artery RA for repeat therapy with electrode 412 at multiple locations within the renal artery. In another embodiment, the multiple electrodes 412 of the PEF system 400 of FIG. 6B are utilized to achieve renal neuromodulation at multiple treatment sites T without repositioning the catheter 410. Such multi-location treatment may be achieved, for example, by simultaneously activating multiple electrodes 412 along the length of catheter 410, or by sequentially activating a series of electrodes. All or a subset of the monopolar electrodes of the embodiment of FIG. 6B may be activated to achieve desired renal neuromodulation.



FIG. 9 schematically illustrates an embodiment of a monopolar PEF system 500 having a plurality of monopolar electrodes that may be expanded into contact with the vessel wall. The PEF system 500 comprises a catheter 510 having an expandable distal cage or basket 520 formed from a plurality of circumferential struts or members. A plurality of electrodes 524 are formed along the members 522 of the basket 520. Each member of the basket illustratively comprises a monopolar electrode configured to contact a wall of the renal artery RA or another desired blood vessel.


The basket 520 may be fabricated, for example, from a plurality of shape-memory wires or ribbons, such as Nitinol, spring steel or elgiloy wires or ribbons, which form the basket members 522. When the basket members comprise ribbons, the ribbons may be moved such that a surface area contacting the vessel wall is increased. The basket members 522 are coupled to the catheter 510 at the proximal and the distal connections 526a and 526b, respectively. In such a configuration, the basket may be collapsed for delivery within a delivery sheath and may self-expand into contact with the wall of the artery upon removal from the sheath. The proximal and/or the distal connection 526 optionally may be configured to translate along the shaft of the catheter 510 for a specified or unspecified distance in order to facilitate the expansion and collapse of the basket.


The basket 520 alternatively may be formed from a slotted and/or a laser-cut hypotube. In such a configuration, the catheter 510 may, for example, comprise an inner and an outer shaft that are moveable relative to one another. The distal connection 526b of the basket 520 may be coupled to the inner shaft, and the proximal connection 526a of the basket may be coupled to the outer shaft. The basket 520 may be expanded from a collapsed delivery configuration to the deployed configuration of FIG. 9 by approximating the inner and the outer shafts of the catheter 510, thereby approximating the proximal and distal connections 526 of the basket and expanding the basket. Likewise, the basket may be collapsed by separating the inner and outer shafts of the catheter.


As seen in FIG. 9, individual electrodes may be arranged along the basket struts or members 522. In one embodiment, the struts are formed from a conductive material coated with a dielectric material, and the electrodes 524 are formed by removing regions of the dielectric coating. The insulation optionally may be removed only along radially outer surfaces of the members such that the electrodes 524 remain insulated on their radially interior surfaces; it is expected that this will direct the current flow outward into the vessel wall.


Other optional fabrication techniques include affixing the electrodes to the inside surfaces and/or outside surfaces of the basket struts, or embedding the electrodes within the struts. The electrode(s) placed along each strut or member may comprise individual electrodes, a common but segmented electrode, or a common and continuous electrode. Individual electrodes or groups of electrodes may be configured to provide a bipolar signal, or all or a subset of the electrodes may be actuated together in conjunction with an external patient ground for monopolar use.


One advantage of having electrodes 524 contact the vessel wall as shown in the embodiment of FIG. 9 is that it may reduce the need for an insulating element, such as an expandable balloon, to achieve renal denervation or other neuromodulation. However, it should be understood that such an insulating element may be provided and, for example, expanded within the basket. Furthermore, having the electrodes contact the wall may provide improved field geometry, i.e., may provide an electric field more aligned with the longitudinal axis of the vessel. Such contacting electrodes also may facilitate stimulation of the renal nerves before, during or after neuromodulation to better position the catheter 510 before treatment or for monitoring the effectiveness of treatment. Further still, wall contact may facilitate multi-location therapy, as in FIG. 8.



FIG. 10 shows another PEF system 600 having one or more monopolar electrodes that contact the vessel wall. In this embodiment, the PEF system 600 comprises a catheter 610 with an optional expandable centering element 620 (e.g., an optional expandable balloon). The PEF system 600 further comprises an expandable helical electrode 630 configured for delivery in a reduced profile configuration through a guidewire lumen 612 of the catheter 610. The helical electrode 630 may, for example, be fabricated from a self-expanding material, such as Nitinol, elgiloy or spring steel.


As seen in FIG. 10, after positioning the catheter 620 in a target vessel (e.g. renal artery RA), the optional centering element 620 may be expanded, e.g., inflated until it contacts the wall of the vessel to hold the catheter at a desired location within the vessel and/or to insulate or increase the impedance of the interior of the vessel. The helical electrode 630 is pushed through the lumen 612 until the helical electrode extends beyond the catheter shaft; the electrode then expands or otherwise moves into the helical configuration to physically contact the vessel wall. A monopolar pulsed electric field then may be delivered between the helical electrode 630 and external ground pad 150.



FIG. 11 illustrates a method for bilateral monopolar renal neuromodulation utilizing the apparatus of FIG. 6A. It should be understood that such bilateral monopolar renal neuromodulation alternatively may be achieved utilizing the extravascular apparatus of FIG. 4 or any other of the foregoing intravascular apparatus, extravascular apparatus, intra-to-extravascular apparatus, or combinations thereof. Bilateral renal neuromodulation may enhance the therapeutic effect in some patients as compared to unilateral renal neuromodulation (i.e., renal neuromodulation performed on neural tissue innervating a single kidney). For example, bilateral renal neuromodulation may further reduce clinical symptoms of CHF, hypertension, myocardial infarction, contrast nephropathy, renal disease and/or other cardio-renal diseases.


As seen in FIG. 11, the catheter 410 of the monopolar PEF system 400 of FIG. 6A may be advanced over a guide wire G into position within the patient's abdominal aorta AA such that the monopolar electrode 412 is substantially in line with the patient's renal arteries RA. First and second ground pads 150a and 150b, respectively, are electrically coupled to the patient's skin S substantially directly lateral to the renal arteries RA. Once the catheter is properly positioned for PEF therapy, the guide wire G may be retracted from the treatment zone (e.g., may be removed from the patient or may be positioned more proximally within the patient's aorta). A pulsed electric field then may be delivered to the active monopolar electrode 412 from the PEF generator 100. The pulsed electric field propagates from the monopolar electrode 412 to the ground pads 150a and 150b to achieve desired bipolar renal neuromodulation.


Monopolar bilateral renal neuromodulation optionally may be performed sequentially by sequentially advancing a monopolar electrode within, or in proximity to, each renal artery RA for PEF therapy. Alternatively, as in the illustrative embodiment FIG. 12, the monopolar electrodes may be positioned simultaneously within both renal arteries RA, but in other embodiments the electrodes can be positioned extravascularly or intra-to-extravascularly with respect to both renal arteries. Monopolar bilateral PEF therapy then may proceed concurrently or sequentially to modulate target neural fibers that contribute to both right and left renal function.



FIG. 12 illustrates one embodiment of a bilateral monopolar PEF system 700 that comprises a catheter 710 having a first distal segment 720a with a first monopolar electrode 730a and a second distal segment 720b with a second monopolar electrode 730b. As seen in FIG. 12, the first distal segment 720a may be advanced within a first renal artery RA to position the first monopolar electrode 730a for monopolar therapy in combination with the first ground pad 150a. Likewise, the second distal segment 720b may be advanced within a second renal artery RA to position the second monopolar electrode 730b for monopolar therapy in combination with the second ground pad 150b. As discussed, the bilateral renal neuromodulation may be performed concurrently or sequentially.


Although preferred illustrative variations of the present invention are described above, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various changes and modifications may be made thereto without departing from the invention. For example, although the monopolar bilateral methods and apparatus for renal neuromodulation of FIGS. 11 and 12 illustratively utilize dual ground pads, it should be understood that such monopolar bilateral renal neuromodulation alternatively may be performed with a single ground pad. Furthermore, although the illustrative variations described herein generally deliver monopolar renal neuromodulation from within or in proximity to a patient's renal artery, it should be understood that such neuromodulation additionally or alternatively may be delivered from other locations within or in proximity to the patient's renal vasculature, such as within or in proximity to the patient's renal vein. It is intended in the appended claims to cover all such changes and modifications that fall within the true spirit and scope of the invention.

Claims
  • 1. A method, comprising: intravascularly positioning a catheter in a reduced profile delivery configuration at a treatment site within a renal artery of a human patient and adjacent to renal nerves;at the treatment site, transforming an expandable member at a distal portion of the catheter between the reduced profile delivery configuration and a treatment configuration, wherein, in the treatment configuration, the expandable member is sized and shaped to place a plurality of electrodes arranged thereabout into apposition with an inner wall of the renal artery of the patient;selectively energizing a first electrode group of the expandable member to deliver a bipolar energy field to the renal nerves; andselectively energizing a second electrode group at the distal portion of the catheter to deliver a unipolar energy field to the renal nerves,wherein delivering the bipolar energy field and the unipolar energy field modulates neural signaling along the renal nerves, andwherein modulating neural signaling along the renal therapeutically beneficial reduction in blood pressure of the patient.
  • 2. The method of claim 1 wherein the bipolar energy field is generated by two or more electrodes carried by the expandable member.
  • 3. The method of claim 1 wherein the unipolar energy field is generated between one or more electrodes carried by the expandable member and a unipolar electrode carried by a shaft of the catheter and positioned proximate to the expandable member.
  • 4. The method of claim 1 wherein the treatment site is a first treatment site, the bipolar energy field is a first bipolar energy field, and the unipolar energy field is a first unipolar energy field, and wherein the method further comprises: at the first treatment site, transforming the expandable member between the treatment configuration and the reduced profile delivery configuration;distally repositioning the catheter to a second treatment site different than the first treatment site;at the second treatment site, transforming the expandable member between the reduced profile delivery configuration and the treatment configuration, for a second treatment;selectively energizing the first electrode group and delivering a second bipolar energy field to the renal nerves at the second treatment site; andselectively energizing the second electrode group and delivering a second unipolar energy field to the renal nerves at the second treatment site,wherein delivering the second bipolar energy field and second unipolar energy field further modulates neural signaling along the renal nerves.
  • 5. The method of claim 1 wherein the expandable member comprises a balloon, and wherein transforming the balloon between the reduced profile delivery configuration and the treatment configuration comprises expanding the balloon such that electrodes arranged thereabout are placed into contact with the inner wall of the renal artery.
  • 6. The method of claim 5 wherein, when the balloon is in the treatment configuration, blood flow is occluded within the renal artery.
  • 7. The method of claim 1, further comprising monitoring a parameter of the catheter and/or tissue within the patient before and during delivery of the bipolar energy field and the unipolar energy field.
  • 8. The method of claim 7, further comprising altering delivery of at least one of the bipolar energy field and the unipolar energy field in response to the monitored parameter.
  • 9. The method of claim 7 wherein monitoring a parameter comprises monitoring a thermal response of the tissue, and wherein the method further comprises maintaining the desired thermal response of the tissue during delivery of the bipolar energy field and the unipolar energy field.
  • 10. The method of claim 1 wherein delivering the bipolar energy field and the unipolar energy field to the renal nerves comprises at least partially ablating one or more renal nerves of the patient.
  • 11. The method of claim 1 wherein delivering the bipolar energy field and the unipolar energy field to the renal nerves comprises thermally altering the renal nerves in a manner that reduces neural traffic to and from a kidney of the patient.
  • 12. A method for treating a hypertensive human patient, the method comprising: positioning an expandable member of a renal denervation catheter at an intravascular location within a renal artery of a human patient and adjacent to neural fibers innervating a kidney of the patient for a treatment, wherein the catheter includes a plurality of first electrodes carried by the expandable member and a second electrode carried by a shaft of the catheter proximate the expandable member;transforming the expandable member between a low-profile delivery state and an expanded treatment state, wherein, in the treatment state, the expandable member is sized and shaped to place the first electrodes into contact with a wall of the renal artery; andablating the neural fibers innervating the kidney via radio frequency (RF) energy delivered in a bipolar fashion using the first electrodes and RF energy delivered in a unipolar fashion using the second electrode,wherein ablating the neural fibers innervating the kidney via RF energy results in a therapeutically beneficial reduction in blood pressure of the hypertensive patient.
  • 13. The method of claim 12 wherein ablating the neural fibers innervating the kidney via RF energy comprises ablating the neural fibers using a combination of (a) bipolar energy delivery from the bipolar electrodes carried by the expandable member and (b) unipolar energy delivery from the unipolar electrode and one or more of the bipolar electrodes carried by the expandable member.
  • 14. The method of claim 12 wherein positioning an expandable member of a renal denervation catheter at an intravascular location within a renal artery comprises positioning a balloon carrying the plurality of first electrodes within the renal artery of the patient.
  • 15. The method of claim 12, further comprising monitoring a parameter of the renal denervation catheter and/or tissue within the patient before and during delivery of the RF energy and altering delivery of the RF energy in response to the monitored parameter.
  • 16. The method of claim 15 wherein monitoring a parameter comprises monitoring temperature, power, and/or impedance.
  • 17. The method of claim 12, further comprising removing the renal denervation catheter from the patient after ablating the neural fibers.
REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present application is a Continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/231,517, filed on Aug. 8, 2016, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,707,035; which is a Continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/075,789, filed on Mar. 21, 2016, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,445,867, which is a Continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/611,651, filed on Feb. 2, 2015, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,327,122, which is a Continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/958,450, filed on Aug. 2, 2013, now abandoned, which is a Continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/371,285, filed on Feb. 10, 2012, now abandoned, which is a Division of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/403,329, filed on Apr. 13, 2006, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,131,371, which is a Continuation-in-Part application of the following: (a) U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/129,765, filed on May 13, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,653,438, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/616,254, filed on Oct. 5, 2004; and 60/624,793, filed on Nov. 2, 2004. (b) U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/408,665, filed on Apr. 8, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,162,303, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Nos. 60/442,970, filed on Jan. 29, 2003; 60/415,575, filed on Oct. 3, 2002; and 60/370,190, filed on Apr. 8, 2002. (c) U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/189,563, filed on Jul. 25, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,145,316. (d) U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 11/266,993, 11/266,933, filed on Nov. 4, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,756,583. (e) U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/363,867, filed on Feb. 27, 2006, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,620,451, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/813,589, filed on Dec. 29, 2005.

US Referenced Citations (567)
Number Name Date Kind
2130758 Rose Sep 1938 A
2276995 Milinowski Mar 1942 A
2276996 Milinowski Mar 1942 A
3043310 Milinowski Jul 1962 A
3127895 Kendall et al. Apr 1964 A
3181535 Milinowski May 1965 A
3270746 Kendall et al. Sep 1966 A
3329149 Kendall et al. Jul 1967 A
3522811 Schwartz et al. Aug 1970 A
3563246 Puharich et al. Feb 1971 A
3650277 Sjostrand et al. Mar 1972 A
3670737 Pearo Jun 1972 A
3760812 Timm et al. Sep 1973 A
3774620 Hansjurgens et al. Nov 1973 A
3794022 Nawracaj et al. Feb 1974 A
3800802 Berry et al. Apr 1974 A
3803463 Cover Apr 1974 A
3894532 Morey Jul 1975 A
3895639 Rodler et al. Jul 1975 A
3897789 Blanchard Aug 1975 A
3911930 Hagfors et al. Oct 1975 A
3952751 Yarger Apr 1976 A
3987790 Eckenhoff et al. Oct 1976 A
4011861 Enger Mar 1977 A
4026300 DeLuca et al. May 1977 A
4055190 Tany et al. Oct 1977 A
4071033 Nawracaj et al. Jan 1978 A
4105017 Ryaby et al. Aug 1978 A
4141365 Fischell et al. Feb 1979 A
4266532 Ryaby et al. May 1981 A
4266533 Ryaby et al. May 1981 A
4305115 Armitage et al. Dec 1981 A
4315503 Ryaby et al. Feb 1982 A
4360019 Portner et al. Nov 1982 A
4379462 Borkan et al. Apr 1983 A
4405305 Stephen et al. Sep 1983 A
4454883 Fellus et al. Jun 1984 A
4467808 Brighton et al. Aug 1984 A
4487603 Harris Dec 1984 A
4530840 Tice et al. Jul 1985 A
4587975 Salo et al. May 1986 A
4602624 Naples et al. Jul 1986 A
4608985 Crish et al. Sep 1986 A
4649936 Ungar et al. Mar 1987 A
4671286 Renault et al. Jun 1987 A
4674482 Waltonen et al. Jun 1987 A
4692147 Duggan Sep 1987 A
4709698 Johnston et al. Dec 1987 A
4715852 Reinicke et al. Dec 1987 A
4774967 Zanakis et al. Oct 1988 A
4791931 Slate Dec 1988 A
4816016 Schulte et al. Mar 1989 A
4852573 Kennedy Aug 1989 A
4865845 Eckenhoff et al. Sep 1989 A
4890623 Cook et al. Jan 1990 A
4976711 Parins et al. Dec 1990 A
4979511 Terry, Jr. Dec 1990 A
4981146 Bertolucci Jan 1991 A
4998532 Griffith Mar 1991 A
5006119 Acker et al. Apr 1991 A
5014699 Pollack et al. May 1991 A
5019034 Weaver et al. May 1991 A
5057318 Magruder et al. Oct 1991 A
5058584 Bourgeois et al. Oct 1991 A
5059423 Magruder et al. Oct 1991 A
5061492 Okada et al. Oct 1991 A
5094242 Gleason et al. Mar 1992 A
5111815 Mower May 1992 A
5112614 Magruder et al. May 1992 A
5125928 Parins et al. Jun 1992 A
5131409 Lobarev et al. Jul 1992 A
5137727 Eckenhoff Aug 1992 A
5188837 Domb Feb 1993 A
5193048 Kaufman et al. Mar 1993 A
5193539 Schulman et al. Mar 1993 A
5193540 Schulman et al. Mar 1993 A
5199428 Obel et al. Apr 1993 A
5203326 Collins et al. Apr 1993 A
5213098 Bennett et al. May 1993 A
5215086 Terry, Jr. et al. Jun 1993 A
5231988 Wernicke et al. Aug 1993 A
5234692 Magruder et al. Aug 1993 A
5234693 Magruder et al. Aug 1993 A
5251634 Weinberg Oct 1993 A
5251643 Osypka et al. Oct 1993 A
5263480 Wernicke et al. Nov 1993 A
5269303 Wernicke et al. Dec 1993 A
5282468 Klepinski Feb 1994 A
5282785 Shapland et al. Feb 1994 A
5286254 Shapland et al. Feb 1994 A
5299569 Wernicke et al. Apr 1994 A
5300068 Rosar et al. Apr 1994 A
5304120 Crandell et al. Apr 1994 A
5304206 Baker, Jr. et al. Apr 1994 A
5317155 King May 1994 A
5324255 Passafaro et al. Jun 1994 A
5324316 Schulman et al. Jun 1994 A
5334193 Nardella Aug 1994 A
5335657 Terry, Jr. et al. Aug 1994 A
5338662 Sadri Aug 1994 A
5351394 Weinberg Oct 1994 A
5358514 Schulman et al. Oct 1994 A
5368591 Lennox et al. Nov 1994 A
5370680 Proctor Dec 1994 A
5389069 Weaver Feb 1995 A
5397308 Ellis et al. Mar 1995 A
5397338 Grey et al. Mar 1995 A
5400784 Durand et al. Mar 1995 A
5405367 Schulman et al. Apr 1995 A
5423744 Gencheff et al. Jun 1995 A
5425364 Imran Jun 1995 A
5429634 Narciso, Jr. Jul 1995 A
5433739 Sluijter et al. Jul 1995 A
5439440 Hofmann Aug 1995 A
5454782 Perkins Oct 1995 A
5454809 Janssen Oct 1995 A
5458568 Racchini et al. Oct 1995 A
5458626 Krause Oct 1995 A
5458631 Xavier Oct 1995 A
5470352 Rappaport Nov 1995 A
5472406 de la Torre et al. Dec 1995 A
5478303 Foley-Nolan et al. Dec 1995 A
5484400 Edwards et al. Jan 1996 A
5494822 Sadri Feb 1996 A
5498238 Shapland et al. Mar 1996 A
5499971 Shapland et al. Mar 1996 A
5505700 Leone et al. Apr 1996 A
5507724 Hofmann et al. Apr 1996 A
5507791 Sit'ko et al. Apr 1996 A
5531778 Maschino et al. Jul 1996 A
5540730 Terry, Jr. et al. Jul 1996 A
5540734 Zabara Jul 1996 A
5553611 Budd et al. Sep 1996 A
5560360 Filler et al. Oct 1996 A
5569198 Racchini Oct 1996 A
5571147 Sluijter et al. Nov 1996 A
5571150 Wernicke et al. Nov 1996 A
5573552 Hansjurgens et al. Nov 1996 A
5584863 Rauch et al. Dec 1996 A
5588964 Imran et al. Dec 1996 A
5589192 Okabe et al. Dec 1996 A
5599345 Edwards et al. Feb 1997 A
5618563 Berde et al. Apr 1997 A
5626576 Janssen May 1997 A
5626862 Brem et al. May 1997 A
5628730 Shapland et al. May 1997 A
5634462 Tyler et al. Jun 1997 A
5634899 Shapland et al. Jun 1997 A
5672174 Gough et al. Sep 1997 A
5688266 Edwards et al. Nov 1997 A
5689877 Grill, Jr. et al. Nov 1997 A
5690691 Chen et al. Nov 1997 A
5700282 Zabara Dec 1997 A
5700485 Berde et al. Dec 1997 A
5704908 Hofmann et al. Jan 1998 A
5707400 Terry, Jr. et al. Jan 1998 A
5711326 Thies et al. Jan 1998 A
5713847 Howard, III et al. Feb 1998 A
5722401 Pietroski et al. Mar 1998 A
5723001 Pilla et al. Mar 1998 A
5725563 Klotz et al. Mar 1998 A
5728396 Peery et al. Mar 1998 A
5747060 Sackler et al. May 1998 A
5755750 Petruska et al. May 1998 A
5756115 Moo-Young et al. May 1998 A
5772590 Webster, Jr. Jun 1998 A
5792187 Adams Aug 1998 A
5800464 Kieval Sep 1998 A
5807306 Shapland et al. Sep 1998 A
5810802 Panescu et al. Sep 1998 A
5814079 Kieval Sep 1998 A
5824087 Aspden et al. Oct 1998 A
5836935 Ashton et al. Nov 1998 A
RE35987 Harris et al. Dec 1998 E
5843069 Butler et al. Dec 1998 A
5860974 Abele Jan 1999 A
5861021 Thome et al. Jan 1999 A
5865787 Shapland et al. Feb 1999 A
5871449 Brown Feb 1999 A
5891181 Zhu et al. Apr 1999 A
5893885 Webster, Jr. Apr 1999 A
5906636 Casscells, III et al. May 1999 A
5906817 Moullier et al. May 1999 A
5913876 Taylor et al. Jun 1999 A
5916154 Hobbs et al. Jun 1999 A
5916239 Geddes et al. Jun 1999 A
5919187 Guglielmi et al. Jul 1999 A
5924997 Campbell Jul 1999 A
5928272 Adkins et al. Jul 1999 A
5935075 Casscells et al. Aug 1999 A
5944710 Dev et al. Aug 1999 A
5954719 Chen et al. Sep 1999 A
5983131 Weaver et al. Nov 1999 A
5983141 Sluijter et al. Nov 1999 A
6004269 Crowley et al. Dec 1999 A
6006134 Hill et al. Dec 1999 A
6009877 Edwards Jan 2000 A
6010613 Walters et al. Jan 2000 A
6024740 Lesh et al. Feb 2000 A
6026326 Bardy Feb 2000 A
6036687 Laufer et al. Mar 2000 A
6041252 Walker et al. Mar 2000 A
6051017 Loeb et al. Apr 2000 A
6058328 Levine et al. May 2000 A
6058331 King May 2000 A
6066134 Eggers et al. May 2000 A
6073048 Kieval et al. Jun 2000 A
6077227 Miesel et al. Jun 2000 A
6086527 Talpade Jul 2000 A
6091995 Ingle et al. Jul 2000 A
6117101 Diederich et al. Sep 2000 A
6122548 Starkebaum et al. Sep 2000 A
6123718 Tu et al. Sep 2000 A
6135999 Fanton et al. Oct 2000 A
6142993 Whayne et al. Nov 2000 A
6146380 Racz et al. Nov 2000 A
6149620 Baker et al. Nov 2000 A
6161048 Sluijter et al. Dec 2000 A
6171306 Swanson et al. Jan 2001 B1
6178349 Kieval Jan 2001 B1
6190353 Makower et al. Feb 2001 B1
6192889 Morrish Feb 2001 B1
6205361 Kuzma et al. Mar 2001 B1
6208894 Schulman et al. Mar 2001 B1
6214032 Loeb et al. Apr 2001 B1
6219577 Brown, III et al. Apr 2001 B1
6224592 Eggers et al. May 2001 B1
6238702 Berde et al. May 2001 B1
6245026 Campbell et al. Jun 2001 B1
6246912 Sluijter et al. Jun 2001 B1
6251130 Dobak, III et al. Jun 2001 B1
6254598 Edwards et al. Jul 2001 B1
6258087 Edwards et al. Jul 2001 B1
6259952 Sluijter et al. Jul 2001 B1
6269269 Ottenhoff et al. Jul 2001 B1
6272377 Sweeney et al. Aug 2001 B1
6272383 Grey et al. Aug 2001 B1
6273886 Edwards et al. Aug 2001 B1
6280377 Talpade Aug 2001 B1
6287304 Eggers et al. Sep 2001 B1
6287608 Levin et al. Sep 2001 B1
6292695 Webster, Jr. et al. Sep 2001 B1
6304777 Ben-Haim et al. Oct 2001 B1
6304787 Kuzma et al. Oct 2001 B1
6306423 Donovan et al. Oct 2001 B1
6314325 Fitz Nov 2001 B1
6322558 Taylor et al. Nov 2001 B1
6322559 Daulton et al. Nov 2001 B1
6326020 Kohane et al. Dec 2001 B1
6326177 Schoenbach et al. Dec 2001 B1
6328699 Eigler et al. Dec 2001 B1
6334069 George et al. Dec 2001 B1
6347247 Dev et al. Feb 2002 B1
6353763 George et al. Mar 2002 B1
6356786 Rezai et al. Mar 2002 B1
6356787 Rezai et al. Mar 2002 B1
6366808 Schroeppel et al. Apr 2002 B1
6366815 Haugland et al. Apr 2002 B1
6393324 Gruzdowich et al. May 2002 B2
6400982 Sweeney et al. Jun 2002 B2
6405079 Ansarinia Jun 2002 B1
6405732 Edwards et al. Jun 2002 B1
6413255 Stern Jul 2002 B1
6415183 Scheiner et al. Jul 2002 B1
6415187 Kuzma et al. Jul 2002 B1
6438423 Rezai et al. Aug 2002 B1
6442424 Ben-Haim et al. Aug 2002 B1
6449507 Hill et al. Sep 2002 B1
6450942 Lapanashvili et al. Sep 2002 B1
6461314 Pant et al. Oct 2002 B1
6464687 Ishikawa et al. Oct 2002 B1
6473644 Terry, Jr. et al. Oct 2002 B1
6482619 Rubinsky et al. Nov 2002 B1
6488679 Swanson et al. Dec 2002 B1
6506189 Rittman, III et al. Jan 2003 B1
6508774 Acker et al. Jan 2003 B1
6514226 Levin et al. Feb 2003 B1
6516211 Acker et al. Feb 2003 B1
6517811 John et al. Feb 2003 B2
6522926 Kieval et al. Feb 2003 B1
6522932 Kuzma et al. Feb 2003 B1
6524607 Goldenheim et al. Feb 2003 B1
6534081 Goldenheim et al. Mar 2003 B2
6536949 Heuser Mar 2003 B1
6542781 Koblish et al. Apr 2003 B1
6562034 Edwards et al. May 2003 B2
6564096 Mest May 2003 B2
6571127 Ben-Haim et al. May 2003 B1
6592567 Levin et al. Jul 2003 B1
6599256 Acker et al. Jul 2003 B1
6600954 Cohen et al. Jul 2003 B2
6600956 Maschino et al. Jul 2003 B2
6601459 Jenni et al. Aug 2003 B1
6605084 Acker et al. Aug 2003 B2
6613045 Laufer et al. Sep 2003 B1
6615071 Casscells, III et al. Sep 2003 B1
6616624 Kieval Sep 2003 B1
6620151 Blischak et al. Sep 2003 B2
6622041 Terry, Jr. et al. Sep 2003 B2
6622731 Daniel et al. Sep 2003 B2
6635054 Fjield et al. Oct 2003 B2
6640120 Swanson et al. Oct 2003 B1
6654636 Dev et al. Nov 2003 B1
6666845 Hooper et al. Dec 2003 B2
6669655 Acker et al. Dec 2003 B1
6671556 Osorio et al. Dec 2003 B2
6672312 Acker Jan 2004 B2
6676657 Wood Jan 2004 B2
6681136 Schuler et al. Jan 2004 B2
6684105 Cohen et al. Jan 2004 B2
6690971 Schauerte et al. Feb 2004 B2
6692738 MacLaughlin et al. Feb 2004 B2
6697670 Chomenky et al. Feb 2004 B2
6711444 Koblish Mar 2004 B2
6718208 Hill et al. Apr 2004 B2
6735471 Hill et al. May 2004 B2
6738663 Schroeppel et al. May 2004 B2
6749598 Keren et al. Jun 2004 B1
6752805 Maguire et al. Jun 2004 B2
6786904 Doscher et al. Sep 2004 B2
6795728 Chornenky et al. Sep 2004 B2
6845267 Harrison et al. Jan 2005 B2
6850801 Kieval et al. Feb 2005 B2
6862479 Whitehurst et al. Mar 2005 B1
6865416 Dev et al. Mar 2005 B2
6869431 Maguire et al. Mar 2005 B2
6885888 Rezai Apr 2005 B2
6916656 Walters et al. Jul 2005 B2
6917834 Koblish et al. Jul 2005 B2
6923808 Taimisto Aug 2005 B2
6927049 Rubinsky et al. Aug 2005 B2
6936047 Nasab et al. Aug 2005 B2
6939345 KenKnight et al. Sep 2005 B2
6939346 Kannenberg et al. Sep 2005 B2
6949097 Stewart et al. Sep 2005 B2
6958060 Mathiesen et al. Oct 2005 B2
6969388 Goldman et al. Nov 2005 B2
6972013 Zhang et al. Dec 2005 B1
6978174 Gelfand et al. Dec 2005 B2
6985774 Kieval et al. Jan 2006 B2
6994700 Elkins et al. Feb 2006 B2
6994706 Chornenky et al. Feb 2006 B2
7004911 Tu et al. Feb 2006 B1
7054685 Dimmer et al. May 2006 B2
7063679 Maguire et al. Jun 2006 B2
7081114 Rashidi Jul 2006 B2
7081115 Taimisto Jul 2006 B2
7083614 Fjield et al. Aug 2006 B2
7122019 Kesten et al. Oct 2006 B1
7155284 Whitehurst et al. Dec 2006 B1
7162303 Levin et al. Jan 2007 B2
7191015 Lamson et al. Mar 2007 B2
7373204 Gelfand et al. May 2008 B2
7444183 Knudson et al. Oct 2008 B2
7617005 Demarais et al. Nov 2009 B2
7620451 Demarais et al. Nov 2009 B2
7647115 Levin et al. Jan 2010 B2
7653438 Deem et al. Jan 2010 B2
7717948 Demarais et al. May 2010 B2
7756583 Demarais et al. Jul 2010 B2
8131371 Demarais et al. Mar 2012 B2
8145317 Demarais et al. Mar 2012 B2
8150519 Demarais et al. Apr 2012 B2
8150520 Demarais et al. Apr 2012 B2
8175711 Demarais et al. May 2012 B2
9327122 Zarins et al. May 2016 B2
9707035 Zarins et al. Jul 2017 B2
20010044596 Jaafar Nov 2001 A1
20020002329 Avitall Jan 2002 A1
20020026222 Schauerte et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020026228 Schauerte Feb 2002 A1
20020032468 Hill et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020038137 Stein Mar 2002 A1
20020040204 Dev et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020045853 Dev et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020065541 Fredricks et al. May 2002 A1
20020072782 Osorio et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020107553 Hill et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020116030 Rezai Aug 2002 A1
20020120304 Mest Aug 2002 A1
20020139379 Edwards et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020165532 Hill, III et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020165586 Hill et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020169413 Keren et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020177846 Mulier et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020183682 Darvish et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020183684 Dev et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020188325 Hill et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020198512 Seward Dec 2002 A1
20030004549 Hill et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030009145 Struijker-Boudier et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030018367 DiLorenzo Jan 2003 A1
20030040774 Terry et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030045909 Gross et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030050635 Truckai et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030050681 Pianca et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030060848 Kieval et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030060857 Perrson et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030060858 Kieval et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030074039 Puskas Apr 2003 A1
20030100924 Foreman et al. May 2003 A1
20030120270 Acker Jun 2003 A1
20030125790 Fastovsky et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030150464 Casscells Aug 2003 A1
20030158584 Cates et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030181897 Thomas et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030181963 Pellegrino et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030199747 Michlitsch et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030199767 Cespedes et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030199768 Cespedes et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030199806 Kieval Oct 2003 A1
20030199863 Swanson et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030204161 Ferek-Petric Oct 2003 A1
20030216792 Levin et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030220521 Reitz et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030229340 Sherry et al. Dec 2003 A1
20030233099 Danaek et al. Dec 2003 A1
20030236443 Cespedes et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040010289 Biggs et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040010303 Bolea et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040019364 Kieval et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040019371 Jaafar et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040064090 Keren et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040064091 Keren et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040065615 Hooper et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040073238 Makower Apr 2004 A1
20040082978 Harrison et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040101523 Reitz et al. May 2004 A1
20040106953 Yomtov et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040111080 Harper et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040127942 Yomtov et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040162590 Whitehurst et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040163655 Gelfand et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040167415 Gelfand et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040176699 Walker et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040176757 Sinelnikov et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040193228 Gerber Sep 2004 A1
20040215186 Cornelius et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040220511 Scott et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040243102 Berg et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040243206 Tadlock Dec 2004 A1
20040249416 Yun et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040254616 Rossing et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050010263 Schauerte Jan 2005 A1
20050021092 Yun et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050038409 Segal et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050049542 Sigg et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050065562 Rezai Mar 2005 A1
20050065573 Rezai Mar 2005 A1
20050065574 Rezai Mar 2005 A1
20050075681 Rezai et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050080409 Young et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050080459 Jacobson et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050096647 Steinke et al. May 2005 A1
20050096710 Kieval May 2005 A1
20050153885 Yun et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050154418 Kieval et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050171523 Rubinsky et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050171574 Rubinsky et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050171575 Dev et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050187579 Danek et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050197624 Goodson et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050209548 Dev et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050209642 Palti Sep 2005 A1
20050228460 Levin et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050234523 Levin et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050240126 Foley et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050240173 Palti Oct 2005 A1
20050240228 Palti Oct 2005 A1
20050240241 Yun et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050245882 Elkins et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050245892 Elkins et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050251212 Kieval et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050261672 Deem et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050267010 Goodson et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050282284 Rubinsky et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050288730 Deem et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060004417 Rossing et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060004430 Rossing et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060025821 Gelfand et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060030814 Valencia et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060036218 Goodson et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060041277 Deem et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060041283 Gelfand et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060067972 Kesten et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060069323 Elkins et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060074453 Kieval et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060079859 Elkins et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060085046 Rezai et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060085054 Zikorus et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060089674 Walters et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060095029 Young et al. May 2006 A1
20060100618 Chan et al. May 2006 A1
20060100667 Machado et al. May 2006 A1
20060106429 Libbus et al. May 2006 A1
20060111754 Rezai et al. May 2006 A1
20060116720 Knoblich Jun 2006 A1
20060121016 Lee Jun 2006 A1
20060121610 Rubinsky et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060135998 Libbus et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060136004 Cowan et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060149350 Patel et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060155344 Rezai et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060167437 Valencia Jul 2006 A1
20060167498 DiLorenzo Jul 2006 A1
20060167499 Palti Jul 2006 A1
20060189941 Seward et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060189960 Kesten et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060190044 Libbus et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060206149 Yun Sep 2006 A1
20060206150 Demarais et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060212076 Demarais et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060212078 Demarais et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060229677 Moffitt et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060235474 Demarais Oct 2006 A1
20060265014 Demarais et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060265015 Demarais et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060271111 Demarais et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060276852 Demarais et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070066957 Demarais et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070066972 Ormsby et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070083239 Demarais et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070129720 Demarais et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070129760 Demarais et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070129761 Demarais et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070135875 Demarais et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070142864 Libbus et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070156200 Kornet et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070173899 Levin et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070208382 Yun Sep 2007 A1
20070265687 Deem et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070282376 Shuros et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070288070 Libbus et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080004673 Rossing et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080015659 Zhang et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080039904 Bulkes et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080091255 Caparso et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080140150 Zhou et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080213331 Gelfand et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080255642 Zarins et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080319513 Pu et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090024195 Rezai et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090036948 Levin et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090062873 Wu et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090076409 Wu et al. Mar 2009 A1
20100010567 Deem et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100057150 Demarais et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100137860 Demarais et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100137952 Demarais et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100168731 Wu et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100168739 Wu et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100174282 Demarais et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100191112 Demarais et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100222851 Deem et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100222854 Demarais et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100249773 Clark et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100268307 Demarais et al. Oct 2010 A1
20110060324 Wu et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110086257 Pitteloud et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110112400 Emery et al. May 2011 A1
20110137298 Nguyen et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110200171 Beetel et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110202098 Demarais et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110257564 Demarais et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110264011 Wu et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110264075 Leung et al. Oct 2011 A1
20120143181 Demarais et al. Jun 2012 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (88)
Number Date Country
3151180 Aug 1982 DE
0811395 Dec 1997 EP
2092957 Aug 2009 EP
WO-1985001213 Mar 1985 WO
WO-1991004725 Apr 1991 WO
WO-1992020291 Nov 1992 WO
WO-1993002740 Feb 1993 WO
WO-1993007803 Apr 1993 WO
WO-1994000188 Jan 1994 WO
WO-1994007446 Apr 1994 WO
WO-1994011057 May 1994 WO
WO-1995025472 Sep 1995 WO
WO-1995031142 Nov 1995 WO
WO-1995033514 Dec 1995 WO
WO-1996000039 Jan 1996 WO
WO-1996004957 Feb 1996 WO
WO-1996011723 Apr 1996 WO
WO-1997013463 Apr 1997 WO
WO-1997013550 Apr 1997 WO
WO-1997036548 Oct 1997 WO
WO-1997049453 Dec 1997 WO
WO-1998037926 Sep 1998 WO
WO-1998042403 Oct 1998 WO
WO-1998043700 Oct 1998 WO
WO-1998043701 Oct 1998 WO
WO-1998048888 Nov 1998 WO
WO1999000060 Jan 1999 WO
WO-1999000060 Jan 1999 WO
WO-1999033407 Jul 1999 WO
WO-1999051286 Oct 1999 WO
WO-1999052424 Oct 1999 WO
WO-2001022897 Apr 2001 WO
WO-2001026729 Apr 2001 WO
WO-2001070114 Sep 2001 WO
WO-2002009808 Feb 2002 WO
WO-2002026314 Apr 2002 WO
WO-2002053207 Jul 2002 WO
WO-2002070039 Sep 2002 WO
WO-2002070047 Sep 2002 WO
WO-2002085192 Oct 2002 WO
WO-2002085448 Oct 2002 WO
WO-2003018108 Mar 2003 WO
WO-2003022167 Mar 2003 WO
WO-2003028802 Apr 2003 WO
WO-2003063692 Aug 2003 WO
WO-2003071140 Aug 2003 WO
WO-2003076008 Sep 2003 WO
WO-2003082080 Oct 2003 WO
WO-2003082080 Oct 2003 WO
WO-2003082403 Oct 2003 WO
WO-2004026370 Apr 2004 WO
WO-2004026371 Apr 2004 WO
WO-2004026374 Apr 2004 WO
WO-2004030718 Apr 2004 WO
WO-2004032791 Apr 2004 WO
WO-2004107965 Dec 2004 WO
WO-2005014100 Feb 2005 WO
WO-2005016165 Feb 2005 WO
WO 2005032646 Apr 2005 WO
WO-2005030072 Apr 2005 WO
WO--2005041748 May 2005 WO
WO-2005065284 Jul 2005 WO
WO-2005084389 Sep 2005 WO
WO-2005097256 Oct 2005 WO
WO-2005110528 Nov 2005 WO
WO-2005123183 Dec 2005 WO
WO-2006007048 Jan 2006 WO
WO-2006018528 Feb 2006 WO
WO-2006022790 Mar 2006 WO
WO-2006031899 Mar 2006 WO
WO-2006041847 Apr 2006 WO
WO-2006041881 Apr 2006 WO
WO-2006105121 Oct 2006 WO
WO-2007008954 Jan 2007 WO
WO-2007035537 Mar 2007 WO
WO-2007078997 Jul 2007 WO
WO-2007086965 Aug 2007 WO
WO-2007103879 Sep 2007 WO
WO-2007103881 Sep 2007 WO
WO-2007121309 Oct 2007 WO
WO2007121309 Oct 2007 WO
WO-2007146834 Dec 2007 WO
WO-2008003058 Jan 2008 WO
WO-2008049084 Apr 2008 WO
WO-2008061150 May 2008 WO
WO-2008061152 May 2008 WO
WO-2008070413 Jun 2008 WO
WO-2010078175 Jul 2010 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (583)
Entry
U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,110, filed Aug. 29, 2012, Demarais et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,209, filed Sep. 13, 2012, Levin et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,233, filed Sep. 13, 2012, Levin et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,243, filed Sep. 13, 2012, Levin et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,253, filed Sep. 13, 2012, Demarais et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,255, filed Sep. 13, 2012, Demarais et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,292, filed Sep. 14, 2012, Demarais et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,327, filed Sep. 14, 2012, Demarais et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,335, filed Sep. 14, 2012, Demarais et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,336, filed Sep. 14, 2012, Levin et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,356, filed Sep. 14, 2012, Demarais et al.
“2011 Edison Award Winners.” Edison Awards: Honoring Innovations & Innovators, 2011, 6 pages, <http://www.edisonawards.com/BestNewProduct_2011.php>.
“2012 top 10 advances in heart disease and stroke research: American Heart Association/America Stroke Association Top 10 Research Report.” American Heart Association, Dec. 17, 2012, 5 pages, <http://newsroom.heart.org/news/2012-top-10-advances-in-heart-241901>.
“Ardian(R) Receives 2010 EuroPCR Innovation Award and Demonstrates Further Durability of Renal Denervation Treatment for Hypertension.” PR Newswire, Jun. 3, 2010, 2 pages, <http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/ardianr-receives-2010-europcr-innovation-award-and-demonstrates-further-durability-of-renal-denervation-treatment-for-hypertension-95545014.html>.
“Boston Scientific to Acquire Vessix Vascular, Inc.: Company to Strengthen Hypertension Program with Acquisition of Renal Denervation Technology.” Boston Scientific: Advancing science for life—Investor Relations, Nov. 8, 2012, 2 pages, <http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=62272&p=irol-newsArticle&id=1756108>.
“Cleveland Clinic Unveils Top 10 Medical Innovations for 2012: Experts Predict Ten Emerging Technologies that will Shape Health Care Next Year.” Cleveland Clinic, Oct. 6, 2011, 2 pages. <http://my.clevelandclinic.org/media_relations/library/2011/2011-10-6-cleveland-clinic-unveils-top-10-medical-innovations-for-2012.aspx>.
“Does renal denervation represent a new treatment option for resistant hypertension?” Interventional News, Aug. 3, 2010, 2 pages. <http://www.cxvascular.com/in-latest-news/interventional-news---latest-news/does-renal-denervation-represent-a-new-treatment-option-for-resistant-hypertension>.
“Iberis—Renal Sympathetic Denervation System: Turning innovation into quality care.” [Brochure], Terumo Europe N.V., 2013, Europe, 3 pages.
“Neurotech Reports Announces Winners of Gold Electrode Awards.” Neurotech business report, 2009. 1 page. <http://www.neurotechreports.com/pages/goldelectrodes09.html>.
“Quick. Consistent. Controlled. OneShot renal Denervation System” [Brochure], Covidien: positive results for life, 2013, (n.l.), 4 pages.
“Renal Denervation Technology of Vessix Vascular, Inc. been acquired by Boston Scientific Corporation (BSX) to pay up to $425 Million.” Vessix Vascular Pharmaceutical Intelligence: A blog specializing in Pharmaceutical Intelligence and Analytics, Nov. 8, 2012, 21 pages, <http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/tag/vessix-vascular/>.
“The Edison Awards™” Edison Awards: Honoring Innovations & Innovators, 2013, 2 pages, <http://www.edisonawards.com/Awards.php>.
“The Future of Renal denervation for the Treatment of Resistant Hypertension.” St. Jude Medical, Inc., 2012, 12 pages.
“Vessix Renal Denervation System: So Advanced It's Simple.” [Brochure], Boston Scientific: Advancing science for life, 2013, 6 pages.
Asbell, Penny, “Conductive Keratoplasty for the Correction of Hyperopia.” Tr Am Ophth Soc, 2001, vol. 99, 10 pages.
Badoer, Emilio, “Cardiac afferents play the dominant role in renal nerve inhibition elicited by volume expansion in the rabbit.” Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol, vol. 274, 1998, 7 pages.
Bengel, Frank, “Serial Assessment of Sympathetic Reinnervation After Orthotopic Heart Transplantation: A longitudinal Study Using PET and C-11 Hydroxyephedrine.” Circulation, vol. 99, 1999,7 pages.
Benito, F., et al. “Radiofrequency catheter ablation of accessory pathways in infants.” Heart, 78:160-162 (1997).
Bettmann, Michael, Carotid Stenting and Angioplasty: A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the Councils on Cardiovascular Radiology, Stroke, Cardio-Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Epidemiology and Prevention, and Clinical Cardiology, American Heart Association, Circulation, vol. 97, 1998, 4 pages.
Bohm, Michael et al., “Rationale and design of a large registry on renal denervation: the Global SYMPLICITY registry.” EuroIntervention, vol. 9, 2013, 9 pages.
Brosky, John, “EuroPCR 2013: CE-approved devices line up for renal denervation approval.” Medical Device Daily, May 28, 2013, 3 pages, <http://www.medicaldevicedaily.com/servlet/com.accumedia.web.Dispatcher?next=bioWorldHeadlines_article&forceid=83002>.
Davis, Mark et al., “Effectiveness of Renal Denervation Therapy for Resistant Hypertension.” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 62, No. 3, 2013, 11 pages.
Dubuc, M., et al., “Feasibility of cardiac cryoablation using a transvenous steerable electrode catheter.” J Interv Cardiac Electrophysiol, 2:285-292 (1998).
Final Office Action; U.S. Appl. No. 12/827,700; dated Feb. 5, 2013, 61 pages.
Geisler, Benjamin et al., “Cost-Effectiveness and Clinical Effectiveness of Catheter-Based Renal Denervation for Resistant Hypertension.” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, col. 60, No. 14, 2012, 7 pages.
Gelfand, M., et al., “Treatment of renal failure and hypertension.” U.S. Appl. No. 60/442,970, filed Jan. 29, 2003, 23 pages.
Gertner, Jon, “Meet the Tech Duo That's Revitalizing the Medical Device Industry.” Fast Company, Apr. 15, 2013, 6:00 AM, 17 pages, <http://www.fastcompany.com/3007845/meet-tech-duo-thats-revitalizing-medical-device-industry>.
Golwyn, D. H., Jr., et al. “Percutaneous Transcatheter Renal Ablation with Absolute Ethanol for Uncontrolled Hypertension or Nephrotic Syndrome: Results in 11 Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease.” JVIR, 8: 527-533 (1997).
Hall, W. H., et al. “Combined embolization and percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of a solid renal tumor.” Am. J. Roentgenol,174: 1592-1594 (2000).
Han, Y.-M, et al., “Renal artery embolization with diluted hot contrast medium: An experimental study.” J Vasc Interv Radiol, 12: 862-868 (2001).
Hansen, J. M., et al. “The transplanted human kidney does not achieve functional reinnervation.” Clin. Sci, 87: 13-19 (1994).
Hendee, W. R. et al. “Use of Animals in Biomedical Research: The Challenge and Response.” American Medical Association White Paper (1988) 39 pages.
Hering, Dagmara et al., “Chronic kidney disease: role of sympathetic nervous system activation and potential benefits of renal denervation.” EuroIntervention, vol. 9, 2013, 9 pages.
Imimdtanz, “Medtronic awarded industry's highest honor for renal denervation system.” The official blog of Medtronic Australasia, Nov. 12, 2012, 2 pages, <http://97waterlooroad.wordpress.com/2012/11/12/medtronic-awarded-industrys-highest-honour-for-renal-denervation-system/>.
Kaiser, Chris, AHA Lists Year's Big Advances in CV Research, medpage Today, Dec. 18, 2012, 4 pages, <http://www.medpagetoday.com/Cardiology/PCI/36509>.
Kompanowska, E., et al., “Early Effects of renal denervation in the anaesthetised rat: Natriuresis and increased cortical blood flow.” J Physiol, 531. 2:527-534 (2001).
Lee, S. J., et al. “Ultrasonic energy in endoscopic surgery.” Yonsei Med J, 40:545-549 (1999).
Linz, Dominik et al., “Renal denervation suppresses ventricular arrhythmias during acute ventricular ischemia in pigs.” Heart Rhythm, vol. 0, No. 0, 2013, 6 pages.
Lustgarten, D. L., et al., “Cryothermal ablation: Mechanism of tissue injury and current experience in the treatment of tachyarrhythmias.” Progr Cardiovasc Dis, 41:481-498 (1999).
Mabin, Tom et al., “First experience with endovascular ultrasound renal denervation for the treatment of resistant hypertension.” EuroIntervention, vol. 8, 2012, 5 pages.
Mahfoud, Felix et al., “Ambulatory Blood Pressure Changes after Renal Sympathetic Denervation in Patients with Resistant Hypertension.” Circulation, 2013, 25 pages.
Mahfoud, Felix et al., “Expert consensus document from the European Society of Cardiology on catheter-based renal denervation.” European Heart Journal, 2013, 9 pages.
Mahfoud, Felix et al., “Renal Hemodynamics and Renal Function After Catheter-Based Renal Sympathetic Denervation in Patients With Resistant Hypertension.” Hypertension, 2012, 6 pages.
Medical-Dictionary.com, Definition of “Animal Model,” http://medical-dictionary.com (search “Animal Model”), 2005, 1 page.
Medtronic, Inc., Annual Report (Form 10-K) (Jun. 28, 2011) 44 pages.
Millard, F. C., et al, “Renal Embolization for ablation of function in renal failure and hypertension.” Postgraduate Medical Journal, 65, 729-734, (1989).
Oliveira, V., et al., “Renal denervation normalizes pressure and baroreceptor reflex in high renin hypertension in conscious rats.” Hypertension, 19:II-17-II-21 (1992).
Ong, K. L., et al. “Prevalence, Awareness, Treatment, and Control of Hypertension Among United States Adults 1999-2004.” Hypertension, 49: 69-75 (2007) (originally published online Dec. 11, 2006).
Ormiston, John et al., “First-in-human use of the OneShot™ renal denervation system from Covidien.” EuroIntervention, vol. 8, 2013, 4 pages.
Ormiston, John et al., “Renal denervation for resistant hypertension using an irrigated radiofrequency balloon: 12-month results from the Renal Hypertension Ablation System (RHAS) trial.” EuroIntervention, vol. 9, 2013, 5 pages.
Pedersen, Amanda, “TCT 2012: Renal denervation device makers play show and tell.” Medical Device Daily, Oct. 26, 2012, 2 pages, <http://www.medicaldevicedaily.com/servlet/com.accumedia.web.Dispatcher?next=bioWorldHeadlines_article&forceid=80880>.
Peet, M., “Hypertension and its Surgical Treatment by bilateral supradiaphragmatic splanchnicectomy” Am J Surgery (1948) pp. 48-68.
Renal Denervation (RDN), Symplicity RDN System Common Q&A (2011), 4 pages, http://www.medtronic.com/rdn/mediakit/RDN%20FAQ.pdf.
Schlaich, Markus et al., “Renal Denervation in Human Hypertension: Mechanisms, Current Findings, and Future Prospects.” Curr Hypertens Rep, vol. 14, 2012, 7 pages.
Schmid, Axel et al., “Does Renal Artery Supply Indicate Treatment Success of Renal Denervation.” Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol, vol. 36, 2013, 5 pages.
Schmieder, Roland E. et al., “Updated ESH position paper on interventional therapy of resistant hypertension.” EuroIntervention, vol. 9, 2013, 9 pages.
Sievert, Horst, “Novelty Award EuroPCR 2010.” Euro PCR, 2010, 15 pages.
Stella, A., et al., “Effects of reversible renal denervation on haemodynamic and excretory functions on the ipsilateral and contralateral kidney in the cat.” Hypertension, 4:181-188 (1986).
Stouffer, G. A. et al., “Catheter-based renal denervation in the treatment of resistant hypertension.” Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology, vol. 62, 2013, 6 pages.
Swartz, J. F., et al., “Radiofrequency endocardial catheter ablation of accessory atrioventricular pathway atrial insertion sites.” Circulation, 87: 487-499 (1993).
Uchida, F., et al., “Effect of radiofrequency catheter ablation on parasympathetic denervation: A comparison of three different ablation sites.” PACE, 21:2517-2521 (1998).
Verloop, W. L. et al., “Renal denervation: a new treatment option in resistant arterial hypertension.” Neth Heart J., Nov. 30, 2012, 6 pages, <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3547427/>.
Weinstock, M., et al., “Renal denervation prevents sodium retention and hypertension in salt sensitive rabbits with genetic baroreflex impairment.” Clinical Science, 90:287-293 (1996).
Wilcox, Josiah N., Scientific Basis Behind Renal Denervation for the Control of Hypertension, ICI 2012, Dec. 5-6, 2012. 38 pages.
Worthley, Stephen et al., “Safety and efficacy of a multi-electrode renal sympathetic denervation system in resistant hypertension: the EnligHTN I trial.” European Heart Journal, vol. 34, 2013, 9 pages.
Worthley, Stephen, “The St. Jude Renal Denervation System Technology and Clinical Review.” The University of Adelaide Australia, 2012, 24 pages.
Zuern, Christine S., “Impaired Cardiac Baroflex Sensitivity Predicts Response to Renal Sympathetic Denervation in Patients with Resistant Hypertension.” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.07.046, 24 pages.
Miller, Reed, “Finding a Future for Renal Denervation With Better Controlled Trials.” Pharma & Medtech Business Intelligence, Article # 01141006003, Oct. 6, 2014, 4 pages.
Papademetriou, Vasilios, “Renal Denervation and Symplicity HTN-3: “Dubium Sapientiae Initium” (Doubt Is the Beginning of Wisdom)”, Circulation Research, 2014; 115: 211-214.
Papademetriou, Vasilios et al., “Renal Nerve Ablation for Resistant Hypertension: How Did We Get Here, Present Status, and Future Directions.” Circulation. 2014; 129: 1440-1450.
Papademetriou, Vasilios et al., “Catheter-Based Renal Denervation for Resistant Hypertension: 12-Month Results of the EnligHTN I First-in-Human Study Using a Multielectrode Ablation System.” Hypertension. 2014; 64: 565-572.
Doumas, Michael et al., “Renal Nerve Ablation for Resistant Hypertension: The Dust Has Not Yet Settled.” The Journal of Clinical Hypertension. 2014; vol. 16, No. 6, 2 pages.
Messerli, Franz H. et al. “Renal Denervation for Resistant Hypertension: Dead or Alive?” Healio: Cardiology today's Intervention, May/Jun. 2014, 2 pages.
Ahmed, Humera et al., Renal Sympathetic Denervation Using an Irrigated Radiofrequency Ablation Catheter for the Management of Drug-Resistant Hypertension, JACC Cardiovascular Interventions, vol. 5, No. 7, 2012, pp. 758-765.
Avitall et al., “The creation of linear contiguous lesions in the atria with an expandable loop catheter,”Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 1999; 33; pp. 972-984.
Beale et al., “Minimally Invasive Treatment for Varicose Veins: A Review of Endovenous Laser Treatment and Radiofrequency Ablation”. Lower Extremity Wounds 3(4), 2004, 10 pages.
Blessing, Erwin et al., Cardiac Ablation and Renal Denervation Systems Have Distinct Purposes and Different Technical Requirements, JACC Cardiovascular Interventions, vol. 6, No. 3, 2013, 1 page.
ClinicalTrials.gov, Renal Denervation in Patients with uncontrolled Hypertension in Chinese (2011), 6pages. www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01390831.
Dodge, et al., “Lumen Diameter of Normal Human Coronary Arteries Influence of Age, Sex, Anatomic Variation, and Left Ventricular Hypertrophy or Dilation”, Circulation, 1992, vol. 86 (1), pp. 232-246.
Excerpt of Operator's Manual of Boston Scientific's EPT-1000 XP Cardiac Ablation Controller & Accessories, Version of Apr. 2003, (6 pages).
Excerpt of Operator's Manual of Boston Scientific's Maestro 30000 Cardiac Ablation System, Version of Oct. 17, 2005 , (4 pages).
Holmes et al., Pulmonary Vein Stenosis Complicating Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: Clinical Spectrum and Interventional Considerations, JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, 2: 4, 2009, 10 pages.
Kandarpa, Krishna et al., “Handbook of Interventional Radiologic Procedures”, Third Edition, pp. 194-210 (2002).
Mount Sinai School of Medicine clinical trial for Impact of Renal Sympathetic Denervation of Chronic Hypertension, Mar. 2013, 11 pages. http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01628198.
Opposition to European Patent No. 2465470, Granted Oct. 28, 2015, Date of Opposition Jul. 27, 2016, 34 pp.
Opposition to European Patent No. EP1802370, Granted Jan. 5, 2011, Date of Opposition Oct. 5, 2011, 20 pages.
Opposition to European Patent No. EP2037840, Granted Dec. 7, 2011, Date of Opposition Sep. 7, 2012, 25 pages.
Opposition to European Patent No. EP2092957, Granted Jan. 5, 2011, Date of Opposition Oct. 5, 2011, 26 pages.
Oz, Mehmet, Pressure Relief, Time, Jan. 9, 2012, 2 pages. <www.time.come/time/printout/0,8816,2103278,00.html>.
Papademetriou, Vasilios, Renal Sympathetic Denervation for the Treatment of Difficult-to-Control or Resistant Hypertension, Int. Journal of Hypertension, 2011, 8 pages.
Pieper, et al., “Design and Implementation of a New Computerized System for Intraoperative Cardiac Mapping” Journal of Applied Physiology, 1991, vol. 71 (4), pp. 1529-1539.
Prochnau, Dirk et al., Catheter-based renal denervation for drug-resistant hypertension by using a standard electrophysiology catheter; Euro Intervention 2012, vol. 7, pp. 1077-1080.
Purerfellner, Helmut et al., Incidence, Management, and Outcome in Significant Pulmonary Vein Stenosis Complicating Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation, Am. J. Cardiol , 93, Jun. 1, 2004, 4 pages.
Purerfellner, Helmut et al., Pulmonary Vein Stenosis Following Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation, Curr. Opin. Cardio. 20 :484-490, 2005.
Remo, et al., “Safety and Efficacy of Renal Denervation as a Novel Treatment of Ventricular Tachycardia Storm in Patients with Cardiomyopathy” Heart Rhythm, 2014, 11(4), pp. 541-546.
Schneider, Peter A., “Endovascular Skills—Guidewire and Catheter Skills for Endovascular Surgery,” Second Edition Revised and Expanded, 10 pages, (2003).
ThermoCool Irrigated Catheter and Integrated Ablation System, Biosense Webster (2006), 6 pages.
Tsao, Hsuan-Ming, Evaluation of Pulmonary Vein Stenosis after Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation, Cardiac Electrophysiology Review, 6, 2002, 4 pp.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/363,867, filed Feb. 27, 2006, 70 pp.
U.S. Appl. No. 60/813,589, filed Dec. 29, 2005, 62 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 60/852,787, filed Oct. 18, 2006, 112 pgs.
Ureter, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ureter, Jun. 2016, 6 pgs.
Wittkampf et al., “Control of radiofrequency lesion size by power regulation,” Journal of the American Heart Associate, 1989, 80: pp. 962-968.
Zheng et al., “Comparison of the temperature profile and pathological effect at unipolar, bipolar and phased radiofrequency current configurations,” Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 2001, pp. 401-410.
2003 European Society of Hypertension—European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension, Guidelines Committee, Journal of Hypertension 2003, vol. 21, No. 6, pp. 1011-1053.
Aars, H. and S. Akre, Reflex Changes in Sympathetic Activity and Arterial Blood Pressure Evoked by Afferent Stimulation of the Renal Nerve, Feb. 26, 1999, Acta physiol. Scand., vol. 78, 1970, pp. 184-188.
Abramov, G.S. et al., Alteration in sensory nerve function following electrical shock, Burns vol. 22, No. 8, 1996 Elsevier Science Ltd., pp. 602-606.
Achar, Suraj, M.D., and Suriti Kundu, M.D., Principles of Office Anesthesia: Part I. Infiltrative Anesthesia, Office Procedures, American Family Physician, Jul. 1, 2002, vol. 66, No. 1, pp. 91-94.
Advanced Neuromodulation Systems' Comparison Chart, Dec. 16, 2008, pp. 1.
Advances in the role of the sympathetic nervous system in cardiovascular medicine, 2001 SNS Report, No. 3, Springer, Published with an educational grant from Servier, pp. 1-8.
Aggarwal, A. et al., Regional sympathetic effects of low-dose clonidine in heart failure. Hypertension. 2003;41:553-7.
Agnew, William F. et al., Evolution and Resolution of Stimulation-Induced Axonal Injury in Peripheral Nerve, May 21, 1999, Muscle & Nerve, vol. 22, Oct. 1999, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 1999, pp. 1393-1402.
Ahadian, Farshad M., M.D., Pulsed Radiofrequency Neurotomy: Advances in Pain Medicine, Current Pain and Headache Reports 2004, vol. 8, 2004 Current Science Inc., pp. 34-40.
Alexander, B.T. et al., Renal denervation abolishes hypertension in low-birth-weight offspring from pregnant rats with reduced uterine perfusion, Hypertension, 2005; 45 (part 2): pp. 754-758.
Alford, J. Winslow, M.D. and Paul D. Fadale, M.D., Evaluation of Postoperative Bupivacaine Infusion for Pain Management After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction, The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, vol. 19, No. 8, Oct. 2003 Arthroscopy Association of North America, pp. 855-861.
Allen, E.V., Sympathectomy for essential hypertension, Circulation, 1952, 6:131-140.
Amersham Health. Hypaque-Cysto, 2003, 6 pages.
Andrews, B.T. et al., The use of surgical sympathectomy in the treatment of chronic renal pain. Br J Urol. 1997; 80: 6-10.
Antman, Elliott M. and Eugene Braunwald, Chapter 37—Acute Myocardial Infarction, Heart Disease—A Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine, 5th Edition, vol. 2, 1997, Edited by Eugene Braunwald, pp. 1184-1288.
Archer, Steffen et al., Cell Reactions to Dielectrophoretic Manipulation, Mar. 1, 1999, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 1999 Academic Press, pp. 687-698.
Arentz, T. et al., Incidence of pulmonary vein stenosis 2 years after radiofrequency catheter ablation of refractory atrial fibrillation. European Heart Journal. 2003. 24; pp. 963-969.
Arias, M.D., Manuel J., Percutaneous Radio-Frequency Thermocoagulation with Low Temperature in the Treatment of Essential Glossopharyngeal Neuralgia, Surg. Neurol. 1986, vol. 25, 1986 Elsevier Science Publishing Co., Inc., pp. 94-96.
Aronofsky, David H., D.D.S., Reduction of dental postsurgical symptoms using nonthermal pulsed high-peak-power electromagnetic energy, Oral Surg., Nov. 1971, vol. 32, No. 5, pp. 688-696.
Aspelin, Peter, M.D., Ph.D. et al., Nephrotoxic Effects in High-Risk Patients Undergoing Angiography, Feb. 6, 2003, New England Journal of Medicine 2003, vol. 348, No. 6, 2003 Massachusetts Medical Society, pp. 491-499.
Atrial Fibrillation Heart and Vascular Health on Yahoo! Health. 2 pgs. <URL: http://health.yahoo.com/topic/heart/overview/article/healthwise/hw160872;_ylt=AiBT43Ey74HQ7ft3jAb4C.sPu7cF> Feb. 21, 2006.
Augustyniak, Robert A. et al., Sympathetic Overactivity as a Cause of Hypertension in Chronic Renal Failure, Aug. 14, 2001, Journal of Hypertension 2002, vol. 20, 2002 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, pp. 3-9.
Awwad, Ziad M., FRCS and Bashir A. Atiyat, GBA, JBA, Pain relief using continuous bupivacaine infusion in the paravertebral space after loin incision, May 15, 2004, Saudi Med J 2004, vol. 25 (10), pp. 1369-1373.
Badyal, D. K., H. Lata and A.P. Dadhich, Animal Models of Hypertension and Effect of Drugs, Aug. 19, 2003, Indian Journal of Pharmacology 2003, vol. 35, pp. 349-362.
Baker, Carol E. et al., Effect of pH of Bupivacaine on Duration of Repeated Sciatic Nerve Blocks in the Albino Rat, Anesth Analg, 1991, vol. 72, The International Anesthesia Research Society 1991, pp. 773-778.
Balazs, Tibor, Development of Tissue Resistance to Toxic Effects of Chemicals, Jan. 26, 1974, Toxicology, 2 (1974), Elsevier/North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 247-255.
Barajas, L. Innervation of the renal cortex. Fex Proc. 1978;37:1192-201.
Barrett, Carolyn J. et al., Long-term control of renal blood flow: what is the role of the renal nerves?, Jan. 4, 2001, Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol 280, 2001, the American Physiological Society 2001, pp. R1534-R1545.
Barrett, Carolyn J. et al., What Sets the Long-Term Level of Renal Sympathetic Nerve Activity, May 12, 2003, Integrative Physiology, Circ Res. 2003, vol. 92, 2003 American Heart Association, pp. 1330-1336.
Bassett, C. Andrew L. et al., Augmentation of Bone Repair by Inductively Coupled Electromagnetic Fields, May 3, 1974, Science, vol. 184, pp. 575-577.
Bassett, C. Andrew L., Fundamental and Practical Aspects of Therapeutic Uses of Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields (PEMFs), Critical Reviews in Biomedical Engineering, vol. 17, Issue 5, 1989, pp. 451-514.
Beebe, Stephen J. et al., Nanosecond pulsed electric fields modulate cell function through intracellular signal transduction mechanisms, Apr. 8, 2004, Physiol. Meas. 25, 2004, IOP Publishing Ltd. 2004, pp. 1077-1093.
Beebe, Stephen J., et al., Nanosecond Pulsed Electric Field (nsPEF) Effects on Cells and Tissues: Apoptosis Induction and Tumor Growth Inhibition, Oct. 11, 2001, IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, vol. 30, No. 1, Feb. 2002, IEEE 2002, pp. 286-292.
Bello-Reuss, E. et al., Acute unilateral renal denervation in rats with extracellular volumn expansion, Departments of Medicine and Physiology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine. F26-F32 Jul. 1975.
Bello-Reuss, E. et al., Effect of renal sympathetic nerve stimulation on proximal water and sodium reabsorption, J Clin Invest, 1976;57:1104-1107.
Bello-Reuss, E. et al., Effects of Acute Unilateral Renal Denervation in the Rat, J Clin Invest, 1975;56:208-217.
Berde, C. et al., Local Anesthetics, Anesthesia, Chapter 13, 5th addition, Churchill-Livingston, Philadelphia 2000, pp. 491-521.
Bhadra, Niloy and Kevin L. Kilgore, Direct Current Electrical Conduction Block of Peripheral Nerve, Feb. 25, 2004, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, vol. 12, No. 3, Sep. 2004, pp. 313-324.
Bhandari, A. and Ellias, M., Loin pain hematuria syndrome: Pain control with RFA to the Splanchanic plexus, The Pain Clinic, 2000, vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 323-327.
Bhatt, Deepak L. et al., Rhabdomyolysis Due to Pulsed Electric Fields, May 11, 1989, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Jul. 1990, pp. 1-11.
Bichet, D., et al., Renal intracortical blood flow and renin secretion after denervation by 6- hydroxydopamine. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 1982;60:184-92.
Bigler, D. et al., Tachyphylaxis during postoperative epidural analgesia—new insights, Apr. 15, 1987, Letter to the Editor, Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1987, vol. 31, pp. 664-665.
Binder, Allan et al., Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Therapy of Persistent Rotator Cuff Tendinitis, The Lancet, Saturday Mar. 31, 1984, The Lancet Ltd., pp. 695-698.
Black, M.D., Henry R., Resistant Hypertension 2004, presentation at Rush University Medical Center, Jul. 15, 2004, 40 pages.
Blad, B., et al., An Electrical Impedance index to Assess Electroporation in Tissue, Tissue and Organ (Therapy), 2001, Oslo, www.bl.uk <http://www.bl.uk> British Library, pp. 31-34.
Blair, M. L. et al, Sympathetic activation cannot fully account for increased plasma renin levels during water deprivation, Sep. 23, 1996, Am. J. Physiol., vol. 272, 1997, the American Physiological Society 1997, pp. R1197-R1203.
Blomberg, S.G., M.D., PhD, Long-Term Home Self-Treatment with High Thoracic Epidural Anesthesia in Patients with Severe Coronary Artery Disease, Mar. 29, 1994, Anesth Analg 1994, vol. 79, 1994 International Anesthesia Research Society, pp. 413-421.
Boehmer, J.P., Resynchronization Therapy for Chronic CHF: Indications, Devices and Outcomes. Penn State College of Medicine: Penn State Heart and Vascular Institute. Transcatheter Cardiovascular Therapeutics 2005, 31 slides.
Bourge, R.C., Heart Failure Monitoring Devices: Rationale and Status 28 pages, Feb. 2001.
Braunwald, E., Heart Disease, A Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine, 5th Ed., vol. 2, 1997, pp. 480-481, 824-825, 1184-1288 and 1923-1925, W.B. Saunders Company.
Bravo, E.L., et al., Renal denervation for resistant hypertension, American Journal of Kidney Diseases, 2009, 3 pgs.
Bunch, Jared T. et al. Mechanisms of Phrenic Nerve Injury During Radiofrequency Ablation at the Pulmonary Vein Orifice. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiclody. vol. 16, No. 12. pp. 1318-1325. Dec. 2005.
Burkhoff, D., Interventional Device-Based Therapy for CHF Will Redefine Current Treatment Paradigms. Columbia University. 2004. 32 slides.
Burns, J. et al., Relationship between central sympathetic drive and magnetic resonance imaging-determined left ventricular mass in essential hypertension. Circulation. 2007;115:1999-2005.
Cahana, A. et al., Acute Differential Modulation of Synaptic Transmission and Cell Survival During Exposure to Pulsed and Continuous Radiofrequency Energy, May 2003, The Journal of Pain, vol. 4, No. 4, © 2003 by the American Pain Society, pp. 197-202.
Cahana, Alex, M.D., Pulsed Radiofrequency: A Neurobiologic and Clinical Reality, May 17, 2005, Anesthesiology 2005, vol. 103, No. 6, Dec. 2005, 2005 American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc., p. 1311.
Calaresu, F.R. et al., Haemodynamic Responses and Renin Release During Stimulation of Afferent Renal Nerves in the Cat, Aug. 12, 1975, J. Physiol. 1976, vol. 255, pp. 687-700.
Cameron, Tracy. Micromodular Implants to Provide Electrical Stimulation of Paralyzed Muscles and Limbs. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 44, No. 9, Sep. 1997. pp. 781-790.
Campese, V.M. et al., Renal afferent denervation prevents hypertension in rats with chronic renal failure. Hypertension. 1995;25:878-82.
Campese, V.M. et al., Renal Afferent Denervation Prevents the Progression of Renal Disease in the Renal Ablation Model of Chronic Renal Failure in the Rat, Am J Kidney Dis. 1995;26:861-5.
Campese, V.M., A new model of neurogenic hypertension caused by renal injury: pathophysiology and therapeutic implications, Clin Exp Nephrol (2003) 7: 167-171, Japanese Society of Nephrology 2003.
Campese, V.M., Neurogenic factors and hypertension in chronic renal failure, Journal of Nephrology, vol. 10, No. 4, 1997, Societa Italiana di Nefrologia, pp. 184-187.
Campese, V.M., Neurogenic factors and hypertension in renal disease. Kidney Int. 2000;57 Suppl 75:S2-3.
Canbaz, S. et al., Electrophysiological evaluation of phrenic nerve injury during cardiac surgery—a prospective, controlled clinical study. BioMed Central. 5 pgs. 2004.
Cardiac Glycosides, Heart Disease—A Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine vol. 2, Edited by Eugene Braunwald, 5th Edition, 1997 WB Saunders Company, pp. 480-481.
Carls, G. et al., Electrical and magnetic stimulation of the intercostal nerves: a comparative study, Electromyogr, clin. Neurophysiol. 1997, vol. 37, pp. 509-512.
Carlson, Scott H. and J. Michael Wyss, e-Hypertension—Opening New Vistas, Introductory Commentary, Hypertension 2000, vol. 35, American Heart Association, Inc. 2000, p. 538.
Carson, P., Device-based Treatment for Chronic Heart Failure: Electrical Modulation of Myocardial Contractility. Transcatheter Cardiovascular Therapeutics 2005, 21 slides.
Chang, Donald C., Cell poration and cell fusion using an oscillating electric field, Biophysical Journal, vol. 56, Oct. 1989, Biophysical Society, pp. 641-652.
Chen, S.A. et al., Initiation of atrial fibrillation by ectopic beats originating from the pulmonary veins: electrophysiological characteristics, pharmacological responses, and effects of radiofrequency ablataion, Circulation, 1999, 100:1879-1886.
Chin, J.L. et al., Renal autotransplantation for the loin pain-hematuria syndrome: long term follow up of 26 cases, J Urol, 1998, vol. 160, pp. 1232-1236.
Chiou, C.W. et al., Efferent Vagal Innervation of the Canine Atria and Sinus and Atrioventricular Nodes. Circulation. Jun. 1997. 95(11):2573-2584. Abstract only. 2 pgs.
Chobanian, Aram V. et al., Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure, Nov. 6, 2003, Hypertension 2003, vol. 42, 2003 American Heart Association, Inc., pp. 1206-1252.
Clinical Trials in Hypertension and Renal Diseases, Slide Source, www.hypertensiononline.org, 33 pages Aug. 13, 2001.
Conradi, E. and Ines Helen Pages, Effects of Continous and Pulsed Microwave Irradiation on Distribution of Heat in the Gluteal Region of Minipigs, Scand J Rehab Med, vol. 21, 1989, pp. 59-62.
Converse, R.L., Jr. et al., Sympathetic Overactivity in Patients with Chronic Renal Failure, N Engl J Med. Dec. 31, 1992, vol. 327 (27), pp. 1912-1918.
Cosman, E.R., Jr. et al., Electric and Thermal Field Effects in Tissue Around Radiofrequency Electrodes, Pain Medicine, vol. 6, No. 6, 2005, American Academy of Pain Medicine, pp. 405-424.
Cosman, E.R., Ph.D., A Comment on the History of the Pulsed Radiofrequency Technique for Pain Therapy, Anesthesiology Dec. 2005, vol. 103, No. 6, 2005 American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc., p. 1312.
Crawford, William H. et al., Pulsed Radio Frequency Therapy of Experimentally Induced Arthritis in Ponies, Dec. 18, 1989, Can. J. Vet. Res. 1991, vol. 55, pp. 76-85.
Curtis, J.J. et al., Surgical therapy for persistent hypertension after renal transplantation, Transplantation, 1981, 31(2):125-128.
Dahm, Peter et al., Efficacy and Technical Complications of Long-Term Continuous Intraspinal Infusions of Opioid and/or Bupivacaine in Refractory Nonmalignant Pain . . . , Oct. 6, 1997, The Clinical Journal of Pain, vol. 14, No. 1, 1998, Lippincott-Raven Publishers 1998, pp. 4-16.
Dahm, Peter O. et al., Long-Term Intrathecal Infusion of Opioid and/or Bupivacaine in the Prophylaxis and Treatment of Phantom Limb Pain, Neuromodulation, vol. 1, No. 3, 1998, International Neuromodulation Society 1998, pp. 111-128.
Dang, Nicholas C. et al., A Novel Approach to Increase Total Urine Output in Heart Failure: Renal Nerve Blockade, ACC 2005 poster; 1 page.
Daniel, Alan and Honig, Carl R. Does Histamine Influence Vasodilation Caused by Prolonged Arterial Occlusion or Heavy Exercise? The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. vol. 215 No. 2. Aug. 21, 1980. pp. 533-538.
Davalos, R. et al., Electrical Impedance Tomography for Imaging Tissue Electroporation, Jul. 25, 2003, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 51, No. 5, May 2004, IEEE 2004, pp. 761-767.
Davalos, R.V. et al., Tissue Ablation with Irreversible Electroporation, Sep. 7, 2004, Annals of Biomedical Engineering, Feb. 2005, vol. 33, No. 2, 2005 Biomedical Engineering Society, pp. 223-231.
De Leeuw, Peter W. et al., Renal Vascular Tachyphylaxis to Angiotensin II: Specificity of the Response for Angiotensin, Dec. 28, 1981, Life Sciences, vol. 30, 1982 Pergamon Press Ltd., pp. 813-819.
Deng, Jingdong et al., The Effects of Intense Submicrosecond Electrical Pulses on Cells, Nov. 26, 2002, Biophysical Journal, vol. 84, Apr. 2003, Biophysical Society 2003, pp. 2709-2714.
Denton, Kate M. et al., Differential Neural Control of Glomerular Ultrafiltration, Jan. 30, 2004, Proceedings of the Australian Physiological and Pharmacological Society Symposium: Hormonal, Metabolic and Neural Control of the Kidney, Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology (2004) 31, pp. 380-386.
Dev, Nagendu B., Ph.D. et al., Intravascular Electroporation Markedly Attenuates Neointima Formation After Balloon Injury of the Carotid Artery in the Rat, Journal of Interventional Cardiology, vol. 13, No. 5, 2000, pp. 331-338.
Dev, Nagendu B., Ph.D. et al., Sustained Local Delivery of Heparin to the Rabbit Arterial Wall with an Electroporation Catheter, May 5, 1998, Catheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis, vol. 45, 1998, Wiley-Liss, Inc. 1998, pp. 337-345.
Devereaux, R.B. et al., Regression of Hypertensive Left Ventricular Hypertrophy by Losartan Compared With Atenolol: The Losartan Intervention for Endpoint Reduction in Hypertension (LIFE) Trial, Circulation, 2004, vol. 110, pp. 1456-1462.
Dibona, Gerald F. and Linda L. Sawin, Role of renal nerves in sodium retention of cirrhosis and congestive heart failure, Sep. 27, 1990, Am. J. Physiol. 1991, vol. 260, 1991 the American Physiological Society, pp. R298-R305.
Dibona, Gerald F. and Susan Y. Jones, Dynamic Analysis of Renal Nerve Activity Responses to Baroreceptor Denervation in Hypertensive Rats, Sep. 19, 2000, Hypertension Apr. 2001, American Heart Association, Inc. 2001, pp. 1153-1163.
Dibona, Gerald F. and Ulla C. Kopp, Neural Control of Renal Function, Physiological Reviews, vol. 77, No. 1, Jan. 1997, the American Physiological Society 1997, pp. 75-197.
Dibona, Gerald F. and Ulla C. Kopp, Role of the Renal Sympathetic Nerves in Pathophysiological States, Neural Control of Renal Function, vol. 77, pp. 142-197 Jan. 1997.
Dibona, Gerald F., Functionally Specific Renal Sympathetic Nerve Fibers: Role in Cardiovascular Regulation, Mar. 6, 2001, American Journal of Hypertension, 2001, vol. 14, 2001 American Journal of Hypertension, Ltd. Published by Elsevier Science Inc., pp. 163S-170S.
Dibona, Gerald F., L.L. Sawin, Effect of renal nerve stimulation on NaCl and H2O transport in Henle's loop of the rat,: 1982, American Physiological Society, F576-F580, 5 pgs.
Dibona, Gerald F., Nervous Kidney—Interaction Between Renal Sympathetic Nerves and the Renin-Angiotensin System in the Control of Renal Function, Jun. 21, 2000, Hypertension 2000, vol. 36, 2000 American Heart Association, Inc., pp. 1083-1088.
Dibona, Gerald F., Neural Control of the Kidney—Past, Present and Future, Nov. 4, 2002, Novartis Lecture, Hypertension 2003, 41 part 2, 2002 American Heart Association, Inc., pp. 621-624.
DiBona, Gerald F., Neural Control of the Kidney: Functionally Specific Renal Sympathetic Nerve Fibers, Starling Lecture, Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, 2000, 279, 2000 The American Physiological Society, pp. R1517-R1524.
Dibona, Gerald F., Peripheral and Central Interactions between the Renin-Angiotensin System and the Renal Sympathetic Nerves in Control of Renal Function, Annals New York Academy of Sciences, pp. 395-406 Jan. 25, 2006.
Dibona, Gerald F., Renal Innervation and Denervation: Lessons from Renal Transplantation Reconsidered, Artificial Organs, vol. 11, No. 6, Raven Press, Ltd., 1987 International Society for Artificial Organs, pp. 457-462.
Dibona, Gerald F., Sympathetic Nervous System and the Kidney in Hypertension, Current Opinion in Nephrology and Hypertension 2002, vol. 11, 2002 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, pp. 197-200.
Dibona, Gerald F., The Sympathetic Nervous System and Hypertension, Dec. 4, 2003, Hypertension Highlights, Hypertension Feb. 2004, vol. 43, 2004 American Heart Association, Inc., pp. 147-150.
Dibona, Gerald, LL Sawin, Effect of renal denervation on dynamic autoregulation of renal blood flow, Feb. 12, 2004, AmJ Physiol Renal Physiol 286, pp. F1209-F1218.
Dong, Jun et al. Incidence and Predictors of Pulmonary Vein Stenosis Following Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation Using the Anatomic Pulmonary Vein Ablation Approach: Results from Paired Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology. vol. 16, No. 8, Aug. 2005. pp. 845-852.
Dorros, Gerald, M.D., Renal Artery Stenting State of the Art, presentation, TCT, Washington D.C., Sep. 2003, 27 pages.
Dueck, Ron, M.D., Noninvasive Cardiac Output Monitoring, the Cardiopulmonary and Critical Care Journal, Chest, vol. 120, sec. 2, Aug. 2001, American College of Chest Physicians 2005, pp. 339-341, 5 pages.
Dunn, Matthew D. et al., Laparoscopic Nephrectomy in Patients With End-Stage Renal Disease and Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease,Oct. 25, 1999, American Journal of Kidney Diseases, vol. 35, No. 4 Apr. 2000, National Kidney Foundation, Inc. 2000, pp. 720-725.
Durand, D.M., Electric Field Effects in Hyperexcitable Neural Tissue: A Review, Radiation Protection Dosimetry, vol. 106, No. 4, 2003 Nuclear Technology Publishing, pp. 325-331.
Effects of Renal Failure on the Cardiovascular System, 5th Edition Heart Disease, A Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine, vol. 2, Edited by Eugene Braunwald, 1997, W.B. Saunders Company, pp. 1923-1925.
Electrical Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Wounds, Radiation Protection Standard, Maximum Exposure Levels to Radiofrequency Fields—3 KHz to 300 GHz, Radiation Protection Series No. 3, Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency, Apr. 1996, 322 pgs.
Electropermeabilization (Electroporation), Cyto Pulse Sciences, Inc., http://www.cytopulse.com/electroporation.html (last accessed Mar. 3, 2005), 3 pgs.
Electroporation based Technologies and Treatments, ESPE Newsletter No. 6, QLK 02002-2003, Jan. 2005, www.cliniporator.com, 4 pgs.
End-stage renal disease payment policies in traditional Medicare, Chapter 8, Report to the Congress: Medicare Payment Policy, Mar. 2001, Medpac, pp. 123-138.
Epidemiology of Renal Disease in Hypertension, slide presentation by hypertensiononline.org, 21 pages Mar. 30, 2001.
Erdine, Serap and Alev Arat-Ozkan, Resistant Hypertension, European Society of Hypertension Scientific Newsletter: Update on Hypertension Management 2003, vol. 4, No. 15, 2 pages.
Esler, M. et al., Mechanism of elevated plasma noradrenaline in the course of essential hypertension. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1986;8:S39-43.
Esler, M. et al., Noradrenaline release and the pathophysiology of primary human hypertension. Am J Hypertens. 1989; 2:140S-146S.
Esler, M. et al., Sympathetic nerve biology in essential hypertension, Clin and Exp Pharmacology and Physiology, 2001, 28:986-989.
European Examination Report; European Patent Application No. 07799148.7; Applicant: Ardian, Inc.; dated Jan. 19, 2010, 4 pgs.
European Examination Report; European Patent Application No. 09156661.2; Applicant: Ardian, Inc.; dated Jan. 19, 2010, 6 pgs.
European Search Report; European Patent Application No. 05806045.0; Applicant: Ardian, Inc.; dated Sep. 22, 2009, 8 pgs.
European Search Report; European Patent Application No. 05811851.4; Applicant: Ardian, Inc.; dated Oct. 1, 2009, 7 pgs.
European Search Report; European Patent Application No. 06847926.0; Applicant: Ardian, Inc.; dated Feb. 10, 2010, 6 pgs.
European Search Report; European Patent Application No. 07757925.8; Applicant: Ardian, Inc.; dated Apr. 29, 2010, 9 pgs.
European Search Report; European Patent Application No. 07798341.9; Applicant: Ardian, Inc.; dated Aug. 4, 2011; 6 pgs.
European Search Report; European Patent Application No. 07799148.7; Applicant: Ardian, Inc.; dated Jul. 23, 2009, 6 pgs.
European Search Report; European Patent Application No. 07868755.5; Applicant: Ardian, Inc.; dated Jul. 28, 2010, 7 pgs.
European Search Report; European Patent Application No. 09156661.2; Applicant: Ardian, Inc.; dated Jul. 23, 2009, 6 pgs.
European Search Report; European Patent Application No. 09167937.3; Applicant: Ardian, Inc.; dated Nov. 11, 2009, 6 pgs.
European Search Report; European Patent Application No. 09168202.1; Applicant: Ardian, Inc.; dated Nov. 11, 2009, 5 pgs.
European Search Report; European Patent Application No. 09168204.7; Applicant: Ardian, Inc.; dated Nov. 19, 2009, 6 pgs.
Evelyn, K.A. et al., Effect of thoracolumbar sympathectomy on the clinical course of primary (essential) hypertension, Am J Med, 1960;28:188-221.
Ex parte Quayle Office Action; U.S. Appl. No. 11/144,173; dated May 28, 2009, 4 pgs.
Fact Book Fiscal Year 2003, National Institutes of Health National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Feb. 2004, 197 pgs.
Fajardo, J. et al., Effect of chemical sympathectomy on renal hydroelectrolytic handling in dogs with chronic caval constriction. Clin Physiol Biochem. 1986;4:252-6.
Fareed, Jawed, Ph.D. et al., Some Objective Considerations for the Use of Heparins and Recombinant Hirudin in Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angoplasty, Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis 1991, vol. 17, No. 4, 1991 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., pp. 455-470.
Ferguson, D.R. et al., Responses of the pig isolated renal artery to transmural electrical stimulation and drugs, Dec. 7, 1984, Br. J. Pharmac. 1985, vol. 84, The Macmillan Press Ltd. 1985, pp. 879-882.
Fernandez-Ortiz, Antonio, et al., A New Approach for Local Intravascular Drug Delivery—Iontophoretic Balloon, Intravascular Iontophoretic Local Delivery, Circulation, vol. 89, No. 4, Apr. 1994, pp. 1518-1522.
Fields, Larry E. et al., The Burden of Adult Hypertension in the United States 1999 to 2000—A Rising Tide, May 18, 2004, American Heart Association 2004, Hypertension Oct. 2004, pp. 1-7.
Final Office Action; U.S. Appl. No. 11/233,814; dated Jan. 29, 2009, 11 pgs.
Final Office Action; U.S. Appl. No. 11/266,993; dated Jan. 8, 2010, 7 pgs.
Final Office Action; U.S. Appl. No. 11/363,867; dated May 1, 2009, 8 pgs.
Final Office Action; U.S. Appl. No. 11/451,728; dated Jan. 13, 2009, 7 pgs.
Final Office Action; U.S. Appl. No. 11/599,649; dated Jan. 15, 2009, 10 pgs.
Final Office Action; U.S. Appl. No. 11/599,723; dated Apr. 5, 2010, 17 pgs.
Final Office Action; U.S. Appl. No. 11/599,890; dated Apr. 29, 2009, 9 pgs.
Fischell, Tim A. et al., Ultrasonic Energy: Effects on Vascular Function and Integrity, Circulation: Journal of the American Heart Association. 1991. 84;pp. 1783-1795.
Freeman, Scott A. et al., Theory of Electroporation of Planar Bilayer Membranes: Predictions of the Aqueous Area, Change in Capacitance, and Pore-Pore Separation, Feb. 23, 1994, Biophysical Journal, Jul. 1994, vol. 67, 1994 by the Biophysical Society, pp. 42-56.
Fukuoka, Yuko et al., Imaging of neural conduction block by neuromagnetic recording, Oct. 16, 2002, Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 113, 2002, Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. 2002, pp. 1985-1992.
Fuster, Valentin et al. ACC/AHA/ESC Practice Guidelines: ACA/AHA/ESC 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Atrial Fibrillation. JACC vol. 48, No. 4, Aug. 15, 2006.
Gami, Apoor S., M.D. and Vesna D. Garovic, M.D., Contrast Nephropathy After Coronary Angiography, Mayo Clin Proc. 2004, vol. 79, 2004 Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research, pp. 211-219.
Gattone II, Vincent H. et al., Contribution of Renal Innervation to Hypertension in Polycystic Kidney Disease in the Rat, University of Chicago Section of Urology, 16 pages, Mar. 17, 2008.
Gaylor, D.C. et al., Significance of Cell Size and Tissue Structure in Electrical Trauma, Jan. 26, 1988, J. theor. Biol. 1988, vol. 133, 1988 Academic Press Limited, pp. 223-237.
Gazdar, A.F. and G.J. Dammin, Neural degeneration and regeneration in human renal transplants, NEJM, Jul. 30, 1970, 283:222-244.
Gehl, Julie et al., In Vivo Electroporation of Skeletal Muscle: Threshold, Efficacy and Relation to Electric Field Distribution, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 1428, 1999, Elsevier Science B.V. 1999, pp. 233-240, www.elsevier.com/locate/bba <http:www.elsevier.com/locate/bba>.
Getts, R.T. et al., Regression of left ventricular hypertrophy after bilateral nephrectomy, Nephrol Dial Transplant, 2006, vol. 21, pp. 1089-1091.
Ghoname, El-sayed A. et al., Percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation: an alternative to TENS in the management of sciatica, Apr. 26, 1999, Pain 1999, vol. 83, 1999 International Association for the Study of Pain / Published by Elsevier Science B.V., pp. 193-199.
Gimple, M.D., Lawrence et al., Effect of Chronic Subcutaneous or Intramural Administration of Heparin on Femoral Artery Restenosis After Balloon Angioplasty in Hypercholesterolemic Rabbits, Laboratory Investigation, Circulation, vol. 86, No. 5, Nov. 1992, pp. 1536-1546.
Goldberger, Jeffrey J. et al., New technique for vagal nerve stimulation, Jun. 2, 1999, Journal of Neuroscience Methods 91, 1999, Elsevier Science B.V. 1999, pp. 109-114.
Gorbunov, F.E. et al., The Use of Pulsed and Continuous Short Wave Diathermy (Electric Field) in Medical Rehabilitation of the Patients with Guillan-Barre Syndrome and Other Peripheral Myelinopathies, May 6, 1994, 5 pages (most of article in Russian language).
Gottschalk, C.W., Renal nerves and sodium excretion, Ann. Rev. Physiol., 1979, 41:229-240.
Greenwell, T.J. et al., The outcome of renal denervation for managing loin pain haematuria syndrome. BJU International, 2004; 4 pgs.
Gruberg, Luis, M.D. et al., The Prognostic Implications of Further Renal Function Deterioration Within 48 h of Interventional Coronary Procedures in Patients with Pre-existent Chronic Renal Insufficiency, Jun. 19, 2000, Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2000, vol. 36, No. 5, 2000 by the American College of Cardiology, pp. 1542-1548.
Guimaraes, Sarfim. Vascular Adrenoceptors: An Update. pp. 319-356, Jun. 1, 2001.
Haissaguerre, M. et al., Spontaneous initiation of atrial fibrillation by ectopic beats orginating in the pulmonary veins, New England Journal of Medicine, 1998, 339: 659-666.
Hajjar, Ihab, M.D., M.S. and Theodore A. Kotchen, M.D., Trends in Prevalence, Awareness, Treatment, and Control of Hypertension in the United States, 1988-2000, JAMA, Jul. 9, 2003, vol. 290, No. 2, pp. 199-206.
Hammer, Leah W. Differential Inhibition of Functional Dilation of Small Arterioles by Indomethacin and Glibenclamide. Hypertension. Feb. 2001 Part II. pp. 599-603.
Hampers, C.L. et al., A hemodynamic evaluation of bilateral nephrectomy and hemodialysis in hypertensive man, Circulation. 1967;35:272-288.
Hamza, M.D., Mohamed A. et al., Effect of the Duration of Electrical Stimulation on the Analgesic Response in Patients with Low Back Pain, Anesthesiology, vol. 91, No. 6, Dec. 1999, American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc. 1999, pp. 1622-1627.
Han, Hyo-Kyung and Gordon L. Amidon, Targeted Prodrug Design to Optimize Drug Delivery, Mar. 21, 2000, AAPS Pharmsci 2000, 2 (1) article 6, pp. 1-11.
Hansen, J.M. et al., The transplanted human kidney does not achieve functional reinnervation, Clin Science, 1994, vol. 87, pp. 13-20.
Hasking, G.J. et al., Norepinephrine spillover to plasma in patients with congestive heart failure: evidence of increased overall and cardiorenal sympathetic nervous activity. Circulation. 1986;73:615-21.
Hausberg, M. et al., Sympathetic nerve activity in end-stage renal disease, Circulation, 2002, 106: 1974-1979.
Heart Arrhythmia Heart and Vascular Health on Yahoo! Health. 13 pgs. <URL: http://health.yahoo.com/topic/heart/overview/article/mayoclinic/21BBE2B0-128D-4AA2-A5CE215065586678;_ylt=Aqd9M5rNyHD0sbPOmHXFhLcPu7cF> Feb. 16, 2005.
Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2004 Update, American Heart Association, American Stroke Association, Dallas, Texas, 2003 American Heart Association, 52 pgs.
Heida, Tjitske, et al., Investigating Membrane Breakdown of Neuronal Cells Exposed to Nonuniform Electric Fields by Finite-Element Modeling and Experiments, May 9, 2002, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 49, No. 10, Oct. 2002, IEEE 2002, pp. 1195-1203.
Heuer, G.J., The surgical treatment of essential hypertension, Annals of Surgery, 1936; 104 (4): 771-786.
Higuchi, Yoshinori, M.D., Ph.D. et al, Exposure of the Dorsal Root Ganglion in Rats to Pulsed Radiofrequency Currents Activates Dorsal Horn Lamina I and II Neurons, Dec. 4, 2001, Experimental Studies, Neurosurgery, vol. 50, No. 4, Apr. 2002, pp. 850-856.
Hildebrand, Keith R., D.V.M., Ph.D. et al., Stability, Compatibility, and Safety of Intrathecal Bupivacaine Administered Chronically via an Implantable Delivery System, May 18, 2001, The Clinical Journal of Pain, vol. 17, No. 3, 2001 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc., pp. 239-244.
Hing, Esther, M.P.H. and Kimberly Middleton, B.S.N., M.P.H., National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2001 Outpatient Department Summary, Aug. 5, 2003, Advance Data from Vital and Health Statistics, No. 338, CDC, 32 pages.
Hodgkin, Douglas D. et al., Electrophysiologic Characteristics of a Pulsed Iontophoretic Drug-Delivery System in Coronary Arteries, Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology. 29(1):pp. 39-44, Jan. 1997, Abstract, 2 pgs.
Hopp, F.A. et al., Respiratory Responses to Selective Blockade of Carotid Sinus Baroreceptors in the Dog, Jun. 22, 2005, Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 1998, vol. 275, 2005 American Physiological Society, pp. R10-R18.
Hortobagyi, Gabriel N., Randomized Trial of High-Dose Chemotherapy and Blood Cell Autographs for High-Risk Primary Breast Carcinoma, Journal of the National Cancer Institute, vol. 92, No. 3, Feb. 2, 2000, pp. 225-233.
Horwich, Tamara, M.D., New Advances in the Diagnosis and Management of Acute Decompensated Heart Failure, the heart.org satellite program, Rapid Review, CME Symposium presented on Nov. 8, 2004 at the Sheraton New Orleans Hotel, 4 pages.
Huang, Wann-Chu et al. Renal Denervation Prevents and Reverses Hyperinsulinemia-Induced Hypertension in Rats, Mar. 25, 1998, Hypertension 1998, vol. 32, 1998 American Heart Association, pp. 249-254.
Huang, Yifei et al., Remodeling of the chronic severely failing ischemic sheep heart after coronary microembolization: functional, energetic, structural and cellular responses, Jan. 8, 2004, Am J Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2004, vol. 286, 2004 the American Physiological Society, pp. H2141-H2150.
Hughes, Gordon B., M.D. et al., A Comparative Study of Neuropathologic Changes Following Pulsed and Direct Current Stimulation of the Mouse Sciatic Nerve, Jun. 27, 1980, American Journal of Otolaryngology, Nov. 1980, vol. 1, No. 5, pp. 378-384.
Hypertension and Renal Disease: Mechanisms, Slide Show by www.hypertensiononline.org, 22 pages Mar. 30, 2001.
Hypertension Incidence and Prevalence, Age-Specific Rates, by Gender, B.C., 2001/2002, Graph, Chronic Disease Management, May 2003, British Columbia Ministry of Health Services, 1 page.
Implantable Neurostimulation Systems, Medtronic Neurological, http://medtronic.com/neuro/paintherapies/pain_treatment_ladder/pdf/implantable_brochure.pdf; 1999, 6 pages.
Implantable Pump—The Medtronic MiniMed 2007 Implantable Insulin Pump System, Medtronic MiniMed, 2006, 5 pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2009/069334; Applicant: Ardian, Inc.; dated Mar. 1, 2010, 10 pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US05/35693, dated Mar. 8, 2006, Applicant: Ardian, Inc., 29 pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US05/35757, dated Dec. 27, 2006, Applicant: Ardian, Inc., 8 pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US06/36120, dated Jun. 25, 2008, Applicant: Ardian, Inc., 10 pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US06/41889, dated Oct. 20, 2008, Applicant: Ardian, Inc., 7 pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US06/48822, dated Aug. 15, 2008, Applicant: Ardian, Inc., 12 pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US07/63322, dated Mar. 3, 2008, Applicant: Ardian, Inc., 10 pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US07/63324, dated Oct. 10, 2008, Applicant: Ardian, Inc., 10 pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US07/66539, dated Jan. 28, 2008, Applicant: Ardian, Inc., 6 pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US07/70799, dated Jul. 2, 2008, Applicant: Ardian, Inc., 7 pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US07/72396, dated Aug. 27, 2008, Applicant: Ardian, Inc., 9 pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US07/84701, dated Aug. 21, 2008, Applicant: Ardian, Inc., 11 pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US07/84705, dated Jul. 28, 2008, Applicant: Ardian, Inc., 12 pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US07/84708, dated Aug. 11, 2008, Applicant: Ardian, Inc., 9 pgs.
International Search Report, PCT/US02/0039, dated Sep. 11, 2002, Applicant: Advanced Neuromodulation Systems, Inc.
International Search Report, PCT/US02/25712, dated Apr. 23, 2003, Applicant: Cyberonics, Inc.
International Search Report, PCT/US03/08014, dated Sep. 23, 2003, Applicant: The General Hospital Corporation.
International Search Report, PCT/US03/09764, dated Oct. 28, 2003, Applicant: CVRX, Inc.
International Search Report, PCT/US04/38498, dated Feb. 18, 2005, Applicant: G & L Consulting, LLC, 4 pgs.
Introduction to Autonomic Pharmacology, Chapter 3, Part 2 Autonomic Pharmacology, pp. 18-26, May 24, 2002.
Isovue: Data Sheet. Regional Health Limited. 8 pgs. Mar. 11, 2003.
Israili, Z.H., Clinical pharmacokinetics of angiotensin II (AT) receptor blockers in hypertension, Journal of Human Hypertension, 2000, Macmillan Publishers Ltd., vol. 14, pp. S73-S86.
Janda, J., Impact of the electrical stimulation apparatus rebox on the course of ischemic renal damage in rats, British Library—The world's knowledge pp. 252-254 (translated and untranslated versions) 1996.
Janssen, Ben J.A. et al., Effects of complete renal denervation and selective afferent renal denervation on the hypertension induced by intrarenal norepinephrine infusion in conscious rats, Jan. 4, 1989, Journal of Hypertension 1989, vol. 7, No. 6, Current Science Ltd, pp. 447-455.
Jia, Jianping et al., Cold injury to nerves is not due to ischaemia alone, Brain. 121;pp. 989-1001. 1998.
Jia, Jianping et al.., The pathogenesis of non-freezing cold nerve injury: Observations in the rat, Brain. 120; pp. 631-646. 1997.
Jin, Yuanzhe et al., Pulmonary Vein Stenosis and Remodeling After Electrical Isolation for Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation: Short- and Medium-Term Follow-Up, PACE, vol. 27., Oct. 2004, pp. 1362-1370.
Johansson, Bjorn, Electrical Membrane Breakdown, A Possible Mediator of the Actions of Electroconvulsive Therapy, Medical Hypotheses 1987, vol. 24, Longman Group UK Ltd 1987, pp. 313-324.
Joles, J.A. et al., Causes and Consequences of Increased Sympathetic Activity in Renal Disease. Hypertension. 2004;43:699-706.
Jorgensen, William A. et al., Electrochemical Therapy of Pelvic Pain: Effects of Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields (PEMF) on Tissue Trauma, Eur J Surg 1994, Suppl 574, vol. 160, 1994 Scandinavian University Press, pp. 83-86.
Joshi, R. P. and K. H. Schoenbach, Mechanism for membrane electroporation irreversibility under high-intensity, ultrashort electrical pulse conditions, Nov. 11, 2002, Physical Review E 66, 2002, The American Physical Society 2002, pp. 052901-1-052901-4.
Joshi, R. P. et al., Improved energy model for membrane electroporation in biological cells subjected to electrical pulses, Apr. 9, 2002, Physical Review E, vol. 65, 041920-1, 2002 The American Physical Society, 8 pages.
Joshi, R. P. et al., Self-consistent simulations of electroporation dynamics in biological cells subjected to ultrashort electrical pulses, Jun. 21, 2001, Physical Review E, vol. 64, 011913, 2001 The American Physcial Society, pp. 1-10.
Kanduser, Masa et al., Effect of surfactant polyoxyethylene glycol (C12E8) on electroporation of cell line DC3F, Aug. 20, 2002, Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects 214, 2003, Elsevier Science B.V. 2002, pp. 205-217.
Kassab, S. et al., Renal denervation attenuates the sodium retention and hypertension associated with obesity, Hypertension, 1995, 25:893-897.
Katholi, R.E. et al., Importance of the renal nerves in established two-kidney, one clip Goldblatt hypertension, Hypertension, 1982, 4 (suppl II): II-166-II-174.
Katholi, R.E. et al., Role of the renal nerves in the pathogenesis of one-kidney renal hypertension in the rat, Hypertension, 1981, 3(4) 404-409.
Katholi, R.E., Renal nerves and hypertension: an update, Fed Proc., 1985, 44:2846-2850.
Katholi, Richard E., Renal nerves in the pathogenesis of hypertension in experimental animals and humans, Am. J. Physiol. vol. 245, 1983, The American Physiological Society 1983, pp. F1-F14.
Kaye, D.M. et al., Functional and neurochemical evidence for partial cardiac sympathetic reinnervation after cardiac transplantation in humans, Circulation, 1993, vol. 88, pp. 1101-1109.
Kelleher, Catherine L. et al., Characteristics of Hypertension in Young Adults with Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease Compared with the General U.S. Population, Jun. 9, 2004, American Journal of Hypertension 2004, pp. 1029-1034.
King, Ronald W. P., Nerves in a Human Body Exposed to Low-Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, Jun. 7, 1999, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 46, No. 12, Dec. 1999, IEEE 1999, pp. 1426-1431.
Kinney, Brian M., M.D., High-Tech Healing—The evolution of therapeutic electromagnetic fields in plastic surgery, Plastic Surgery Products, Jun. 2004, pp. 32-36, 3 pages.
Kirchheim, H. et al., Sympathetic modulation of renal hemodynamics, renin release and sodium excretion, Klin Wochenschr, 1989, 67:858-864.
Klein, K. et al., Impaired autofeedback regulation of hypothalamic norepinephrine release in experimental uremia. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005;16:2081-7.
Knot, H. J. et al., Regulation of arterial diameter and wall [Ca2+] in cerebral arteries of rat by membrane potential and intravascular pressure. The Journal of Physiology. 1998. 508; pp. 199-209.
Kok, Lai Chow et al. Effect of Heating on Pulmonary Veins: How to Avoid Pulmonary Vein Stenosis. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology. vol. 14, No. 3, Mar. 2003. pp. 250-254.
Kok, R. J. et al., Specific Delivery of Captopril to the Kidney with the Prodrug Captopril-Lysozyme, Aug. 16, 1998, Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, vol. 288, No. 1, 1999 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, pp. 281-285.
Kon, V. Neural Control of Renal Circulation, Miner Electrolyte Metab. 1989;15:33-43.
Koomans, H.A., et al., Sympathetic hyperactivity in chronic renal failure: a wake-up call. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2004;15:524-37.
Kopp, U. et al., Dietary sodium loading increases arterial pressure in afferent renal-denervated rats, Hypertension, 2003, 42:968-973.
Kopp, U.C. et al., Renal sympathetic nerve activity modulates afferent renal nerve activity by PGE2-dependent activation of alphal- and alpha2-adrenoceptors on renal sensory nerve fibers. Am J Physiol Regul lntegr Comp Physiol. 2007;293:R1561-72.
Koyama, Shozo et al., Relative Contribution of Renal Nerve and Adrenal Gland to Renal Vascular Tone During Prolonged Canine Hemorrhagic Hypotension, Sep. 24, 1992, Circulatory Shock 1993, vol. 39, Wiley-Liss, Inc. 1993, pp. 269-274.
Kozak, Lola Jean, Ph.D et al., National Hospital Discharge Survey: 2001 Annual Summary with Detailed Diagnosis and Procedure Data, Vital and Health Statistics, Serices 13 No. 156, Jun. 2004, CDC, 206 pages.
Kumagai, K. et al. New Approach to Pulmonary Vein Isolation for Atrial Fibrillation Using a Multielectrode Basket Catheter. Circulation Journal. 2006;70:88-93.
Lafayette, Richard A., M.D., How Does Knocking Out Angiotensin II Activity Reduce Renal Injury in Mice?, Jun. 14, 1999, Journal Club, American Journal of Kidney Diseases, vol. 35, No. 1, Jan. 2000, National Kidney Foundation, Inc. 2000, pp. 166-172.
Lavie, Peretz, Ph.D. and Victor Hoffstein, M.D., Sleep Apnea Syndrome: A Possible Contributing Factor to Resistant Hypertension, Jun. 2001, Sleep 2001, vol. 24, No. 6, pp. 721-725.
Le Noble, J.L. et al., Pharmacological evidence for rapid destruction of efferent renal nerves in rats by intrarenal infusion of 6-hydroxydopamine. J Hypertens Suppl. 1985;3:S137-40.
Lee, Michael A. (editor). SPORTSMed. Connecticut State Medical Society Committee on the Medical Aspects of Sports. Fall/Winter 2005. 10 pgs.
Lee, Raphael C. et al., Biophysical Injury Mechanisms in Electronic Shock Trauma, Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng., 2000, vol. 2, Copyright © 2000 by Annual Reviews, pp. 477-509.
Lee, Raphael C. et al., Clinical Sequelae Manifested in Electrical Shock Survivors, Presentation by the Electrical Trauma Research Program, The University of Chicago, 37 pages Dec. 24, 2004.
Lee, Raphael C. et al., Membrane Biology and Biophysics, Chapter 25, Surgical Research, 2001 Academic Press, pp. 297-305.
Lee, Raphael C., M.D., Sc.D. and Michael S. Kolodney, S.B., Electrical Injury Mechanisms: Electrical Breakdown of Cell Membranes, Oct. 1, 1986, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Nov. 1987, vol. 80, No. 5, pp. 672-679.
Lenoble, L.M. et al., Selective efferent chemical sympathectomy of rat kidneys. Am J Physiol. 1985;249:R496-501.
Ligtenberg, Gerry M.D. et al., Reduction of Sympathetic Hyperactivity by Enalapril in Patients with Chronic Renal Failure, Apr. 29, 1999, New England Journal of Medicine 1999, vol. 340, No. 17, 1999 Massachusetts Medical Society, pp. 1321-1328.
Lin, Vernon W. H. et al., High intensity magnetic stimulation over the lumbosacral spine evokes antinociception in rats, Apr. 16, 2002, Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 113, 2002 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd., pp. 1006-1012.
Lipfert, Peter, M.D. et al., Tachyphylaxis to Local Anesthetics Does Not Result form Reduced Drug Effectiveness at the Nerve Itself, Aug. 3, 1988, Anesthesiology 1989, vol. 70, pp. 71-75.
Lohmeier, Thomas E. and Drew A. Hildebrandt, Renal Nerves Promote Sodium Excretion in Angiotensin-Induced Hypertension, Oct. 20, 1997, Hypertension 1998, vol. 31, part 2, 1998 American Heart Association, Inc., pp. 429-434.
Lohmeier, Thomas E. et al., Prolonged Activation of the Baroreflex Produces Sustained Hypotension, Harry Goldblatt Award, Nov. 26, 2003, Hypertension 2004, vol. 43, Part 2, 2004 American Heart Association, Inc., pp. 306-311.
Lohmeier, Thomas E. et al., Renal Nerves Promote Sodium Excretion During Long-Term Increases in Salt Intake, Oct. 23, 1998, Hypertension 1999, vol. 33, part II, 1999 American Heart Association, Inc., pp. 487-492.
Lohmeier, Thomas E. et al., Sustained influence of the renal nerves to attenuate sodium retention in angiotensin hypertension, Apr. 13, 2001, Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, vol. 281, 2001 the American Physiological Society, pp. R434-R443.
Lohmeier, Thomas E., et al., Baroreflexes prevent neurally induced sodium retention in angiotensin hypertension, American Journal Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, vol. 279, 2000 the American Physiological Society, pp. R1437-R1448.
Lohmeier, Thomas E., Interactions Between Angiotensin II and Baroreflexes in Long-Term Regulation of Renal Sympathetic Nerve Activity, Circulation Research, Jun. 27, 2003, American Heart Association, Inc.2003, pp. 1282-1284.
Luff, S.E. et al., Two types of sympathetic axon innervating the juxtaglomerular arterioles of the rabbit and rat kidney differ structurally from those supplying other arteries, May 1, 1991, Journal of Neurocytology 1991, vol. 20, 1991 Chapman and Hall Ltd., pp. 781-795.
Luippold, G. et al., Chronic renal denervation prevents glomerular hyperfiltration in diabetic rats, Nephrol Dial Transplant (2004) 19:342-347.
Lundborg, C. et al., Clinical experience using intrathecal (IT) bupivacaine infusion in three patients with complex regional pain syndrome type I (CRPS-I), Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1999, vol. 43, pp. 667-678.
Maeder, Micha, M.D. et al., Contrast Nephropathy: Review Focusing on Prevention, Jun. 22, 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology Nov. 2, 2004, vol. 44, No. 9, 2004 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation, pp. 1763-1771.
Malpas, Simon C., What sets the long-term level of sympathetic nerve activity: is there a role for arterial baroreceptors?, Invited Review, Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2004, vol. 286, 2004 the American Physiological Society, pp. R1-R12.
Mancia, G., Grassi, G., Giannattasio, C., Seravalle, G., Sympathetic actrivation of pathogenesis of hypertension and progression of organ damage, Hypertension 1999, 34 (4 Pt 2): 724-728.
Marenzi, Giancarlo, M.D. et al., The Prevention of Radiocontrast-Agent-Induced Nephropathy by Hemofiltration, New England Journal of Medicine, Oct. 2, 2003, vol. 349 (14), 2003 Massachusetts Medical Society, pp. 1333-1340.
Market for infusion pumps grows with an aging population, NWL 97-01, The BBI Newsletter, vol. 20, No. 2, Feb. 1, 1997, American Health Consultants, Inc., pp. 6.
Martin, Jason B. et al., Gene Transfer to Intact Mesenteric Arteries by Electroporation, Mar. 27, 2000, Journal of Vascular Research 2000, vol. 37, 2000 S. Karger AG, Basel, pp. 372-380.
McCreery, Douglas B. et al., Charge Density and Charge Per Phase as Cofactors in Neural Injury Induced by Electrical Stimulation, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 17, No. 10, Oct. 1990, pp. 996-1000.
McCullough, Peter A., M.D., MPH et al., Acute Renal Failure after Coronary Intervention: Incidence, Risk Factors and Relationship to Mortality, Apr. 14, 1997, Am J Med. 1997, vol. 103, 1997 Excerpta Medica, Inc., pp. 368-375.
McMurray, John J.V., M.D. and Eileen O'Meara, M.D., Treatment of Heart Failure with Spironolactone—Trial and Tribulations, Aug. 5, 2004, New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 351, No. 6, 2004 Massachusetts Medical Society, pp. 526-528.
McRobbie, D. and M.A. Foster, Thresholds for biological effects of time-varying magnetic fields, Dec. 16, 1983, Clin. Phys. Physiol. Meas. 1984, vol. 5, No. 2, 1984 The Institute of Physics, pp. 67-78.
Medtronic Neurostimulation Systems, Expanding the Array of Pain Control Solutions, informational pamphlet, 1999 Medtronic, Inc., 6 pages.
Medtronic, Spinal Cord Stimulation, Patient Management Guidelines for Clinicians, Medtronic, Inc. 1999, 115 pages.
Medtronic, SynchroMed Infusion System—Clinical Reference Guide for Pain Therapy, Medtronic, Inc. 1998, 198 pages.
Mehran, Roxana, Renal insufficiency and contrast nephropathy: The most common, least understood risk factor, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, Columbia University Medical Center, 2005, 86 slides.
Mess, Sarah A., M.D. et al., Implantable Baclofen Pump as an Adjuvant in Treatment of Pressure Sores, Mar. 1, 2003, Annals of Plastic Surgery, vol. 51, No. 5, Nov. 2003, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2003, pp. 465-467.
Micro ETS Hyperhidrosis USA Hyperhidrosis USA. 2 pgs. <URL: http://www.hyperhidrosis-usa.com/Index.html>. Nov. 6, 2006.
Mihran, Richard T. et al., Temporally-Specific Modification of Myelinated Axon Excitability in Vitro Following a Single Ultrasound Pulse, Sep. 25, 1989, Ultrasound in Med. & Biol. 1990, vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 297-309.
Miklav{hacek over (c)}i{hacek over (c)}, D. et al, A Validated Model of in Vivo Electric Field Distribution in Tissues for Electrochemotherapy and for DNA Electrotransfer for Gene Therapy, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 1523, 2000, pp. 73-83, <http:www.elsevier.com/locate/bba>.
Mitchell, G. A. G., The Nerve Supply of the Kidneys, Aug. 20, 1949, Acta Anatomica, vol. X, Fasc. ½, 1950, pp. 1-37.
Morrisey, D.M. et al., Sympathectomy in the treatment of hypertension: Review of 122 cases, Lancet. 1953;1:403-408.
Moss, Nicholas G., Renal function and renal afferent and efferent nerve activity, Am. J. Physiol. 1982, vol. 243, 1982 the American Physiological Society, pp. F425-F433.
Munglani, Rajesh, The longer term effect of pulsed radiofrequency for neuropathic pain, Jun. 8, 1998, Pain 80, 1999, International Association for the Study of Pain 1999, Published by Elsevier Science B.V., pp. 437-439.
Naropin (ropivacaine HCl) Injection, RX only Description, AstraZeneca 2001, 3 pages.
National High Blood Pressure Education Program, 1995 Update of the Working Group Reports on Chronic Renal Failure and Renovascular Hypertension, presentation, 13 pages.
National Kidney Foundation, Are You at Increased Risk for Chronic Kidney Disease?, 2002 National Kidney Foundation, Inc., 14 pages.
Nelson, L. et al., Neurogenic Control of Renal Function in Response to Graded Nonhypotensive Hemorrahage in Conscious Dogs, Sep. 13, 1992, Am J. Physiol. 264, 1993, American Physiological Society 1993, pp. R661-R667.
Nikolsky, Eugenia, M.D. et al., Radiocontrast Nephropathy: Identifying the High-Risk Patient and the Implications of Exacerbating Renal Function, Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2003, vol. 4, Supp. 1, 2003 MedReviews, LLC, pp. S7-S14.
Non-Final Office Action; U.S. Appl. No. 10/408,665; dated Mar. 21, 2006, 14 pgs.
Non-Final Office Action; U.S. Appl. No. 11/129,765; dated May 18, 2007, 10 pgs.
Non-Final Office Action; U.S. Appl. No. 11/129,765; dated Sep. 10, 2007, 5 pgs.
Non-Final Office Action; U.S. Appl. No. 11/129,765; dated Oct. 6, 2006, 30 pgs.
Non-Final Office Action; U.S. Appl. No. 11/133,925; dated Oct. 8, 2008, 41 pgs.
Non-Final Office Action; U.S. Appl. No. 11/144,173; dated Apr. 5, 2007, 33 pgs.
Non-Final Office Action; U.S. Appl. No. 11/144,173; dated Sep. 10, 2007, 5 pgs.
Non-Final Office Action; U.S. Appl. No. 11/144,298; dated Oct. 29, 2009, 8 pgs.
Non-Final Office Action; U.S. Appl. No. 11/144,298; dated Apr. 5, 2007, 33 pgs.
Non-Final Office Action; U.S. Appl. No. 11/144,298; dated Sep. 10, 2007, 5 pgs.
Non-Final Office Action; U.S. Appl. No. 11/144,298; dated Dec. 29, 2008, 7 pgs.
Non-Final Office Action; U.S. Appl. No. 11/145,122; dated Apr. 11, 2007, 33 pgs.
Non-Final Office Action; U.S. Appl. No. 11/145,122; dated Sep. 10, 2007, 5 pgs.
Non-Final Office Action; U.S. Appl. No. 11/189,563; dated May 28, 2009, 5 pgs.
Non-Final Office Action; U.S. Appl. No. 11/233,814; dated Jun. 17, 2008, 12 pgs.
Non-Final Office Action; U.S. Appl. No. 11/252,462; dated Feb. 22, 2010, 6 pgs.
Non-Final Office Action; U.S. Appl. No. 11/266,993; dated Jul. 8, 2009, 5 pgs.
Non-Final Office Action; U.S. Appl. No. 11/266,993; dated Dec. 30, 2008, 7 pgs.
Non-Final Office Action; U.S. Appl. No. 11/363,867; dated Sep. 25, 2008, 10 pgs.
Non-Final Office Action; U.S. Appl. No. 11/368,553; dated May 18, 2010, 4 pgs.
Non-Final Office Action; U.S. Appl. No. 11/368,553; dated Oct. 7, 2009, 5 pgs.
Non-Final Office Action; U.S. Appl. No. 11/368,809; dated Dec. 3, 2009, 4 pgs.
Non-Final Office Action; U.S. Appl. No. 11/368,949; dated Jun. 11, 2010, 6 pgs.
Non-Final Office Action; U.S. Appl. No. 11/368,971; dated Aug. 24, 2010, 9 pgs.
Non-Final Office Action; U.S. Appl. No. 11/451,728; dated Jun. 12, 2008, 41 pgs.
Non-Final Office Action; U.S. Appl. No. 11/451,728; dated Jul. 2, 2009, 5 pgs.
Non-Final Office Action; U.S. Appl. No. 11/451,728; dated Dec. 28, 2009, 7 pgs.
Non-Final Office Action; U.S. Appl. No. 11/504,117; dated Mar. 31, 2009, 10 pgs.
Non-Final Office Action; U.S. Appl. No. 11/599,649; dated Mar. 30, 2009, 10 pgs.
Non-Final Office Action; U.S. Appl. No. 11/599,649; dated Jun. 23, 2008, 9 pgs.
Non-Final Office Action; U.S. Appl. No. 11/599,723; dated Jun. 26, 2009, 17 pgs.
Non-Final Office Action; U.S. Appl. No. 11/599,723; dated Oct. 15, 2010, 16 pgs.
Non-Final Office Action; U.S. Appl. No. 11/599,882; dated Jul. 6, 2009, 13 pgs.
Non-Final Office Action; U.S. Appl. No. 11/688,178; dated Jun. 28, 2010, 5 pgs.
Non-Final Office Action; U.S. Appl. No. 11/840,142; dated Apr. 3, 2009, 13 pgs.
Non-Final Office Action; U.S. Appl. No. 12/567,521; dated Sep. 3, 2010, 9 pgs.
Non-Final Office Action; U.S. Appl. No. 12/616,708; dated Sep. 16, 2010, 10 pgs.
Non-Final Office Action; U.S. Appl. No. 12/725,375; dated Oct. 12, 2010, 14 pgs.
Nozawa, T.et al., Effects of Long Term Renal Sympathetic Denervation on Heart Failure After Myocardial Infarction in Rats, Sep. 22, 2001, Heart Vessels, 2002, 16, Springer-Verlag 2002, pp. 51-56.
O'Hagan, K.P. et al., Renal denervation decreases blood pressure in DOCA-treated miniature swine with established hypertension, Am J Hypertens., 1990, 3:62-64.
Onesti, G. et al., Blood pressure regulation in end-stage renal disease and anephric man, Circ Res Suppl., 1975, 36 & 37: 145-152.
Osborn, et al., Effect of renal nerve stimulation on renal blood flow autoregulation and antinatriuresis during reductions in renal perfusion pressure, in Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine, vol. 168, 77-81, 1981. (Abstract).
Packer, Douglas L. et al., Clinical Presentation, Investigation, and Management of Pulmonary Vein Stenosis Complication Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation, Circulation: Journal of the American Heart Association. Feb. 8, 2005. pp. 546-554.
Page, I.H. et al., The Effect of Renal Denervation on the Level of Arterial Blood Pressure and Renal Function in Essential Hypertension. J Clin Invest. 1934;14:27-30.
Page, I.H., et al., The Effect of Renal Efficiencyof Lowering Arterial Blood Pressure in Cases of Essential Nephritis, Hospital of the Rockefeller Institue, Jul. 12, 1934, 7 pgs.
Palmer, Biff, F., M.D., Managing Hyperkalemia Caused by Inhibitors of the Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System, Aug. 5, 2004, The New England Journal of Medicine 2004, vol. 351;6, 2004 Massachusetts Medical Society, pp. 585-592.
Pappone, Carlo et al., [2005][P2-70] Safety Report of Circumferential Pulmonary Vein Ablation. A 9-Year Single-Center Experience on 6,442 Patients with Atrial Fibrillation, Abstract only. 1 page, May 2005.
Pappone, Carlo et al., [2004][759] Pulmonary Vein Denervation Benefits Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Patients after Circumferential Ablation, Abstract only. 1 page, Jan. 5, 2004.
Pappone, Carol and Santinelli, Vincenzo. Multielectrode basket catheter: A new tool for curing atrial fibrillation? Heart Rhythm, vol. 3, Issue 4, pp. 385-386. Apr. 2006.
Peacock, J.M. and R. Orchardson, Action potential conduction block of nerves in vitro by potassium citrate, potassium tartrate and potassium oxalate, May 6, 1998, Journal of Clinical Periodontology, Munksgaard 1999, vol. 26, pp. 33-37.
Petersson, M. et al., Long-term outcome in relation to renal sympathetic activity in patients with chronic heart failure. Eur Heart J. 2005;26:906-13.
Pettersson, A. et al., Renal interaction between sympathetic activity and ANP in rats with chronic ischaemic heart failure, Nov. 25, 1988, Acta Physiol Scand 1989, 135, pp. 487-492.
PHCL 762 Pharmacology of the Autonomic Nervous System, Chapter 2 and 6.8 in Mosby, http://www.kumc.edu/research/medicine/pharmacology/CAI/phcl762.html, last accessed Aug. 24, 2004, 14 pgs.
Pitt, B. et al., Effects of Eplerenone, Enalapril, and Eplerenone/Enalapril in Patients With Essential Hypertension and Left Ventricular Hypertrophy: The 4E-Left Ventricular Hypertrophy Study, Circulation, 2003, vol. 108, pp. 1831-1838.
Pliquett, U., Joule heating during solid tissue electroporation, Oct. 22, 2002, Med. Biol. Eng. Comput., 2003, vol. 41, pp. 215-219.
Podhajsky R.J. et al, The Histologic Effects of Pulsed and Continuous Radiofrequency Lesions at 42 C to Rat Dorsal Root Ganglion and Sciatic Nerve, Spine, vol. 30, No. 9, 2005, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Inc., pp. 1008-1013.
Pope, Jill. Fixing a Hole: Treating Injury by Repairing Cells. The New York Academy of Sciences. Jul. 6, 2006. 6 pgs.
Popovic, Jennifer R. and Margaret J. Hall, 1999 National Hospital Discharge Survey, Apr. 24, 2001, Advance Data, No. 319, CDC, pp. 1-17 & 20.
Practice Guidelines Writing Committee and ESH/ESC Hypertension Guidelines Committee, Practice Guidelines for Primary Care Physicians: 2003 ESH/ESC Hypertension Guidelines, Published in Journal of Hypertension 2003, vol. 21, No. 10: 1011-1053, European Society of Hypertension 2003, pp. 1779-1786.
Programmable Infusion System, Pumps and Pump Selection, Medtronic Pain Therapies, Medtronic, Inc. Sep. 5, 2001, 2 pgs.
Pucihar, Gorazd et al., The influence of medium conductivity on electropermeabilization and survival of cells in vitro, May 31, 2001, Bioelectrochemistry, vol. 54, 2001, Elsevier Science B.V. 2001, pp. 107-115.
Pulmonary Concepts in Critical Care Breath Sounds, http://rnbob.tripod.com/breath.htm, last accessed Aug. 23, 2004, 5 pages.
Pulmonary Function Testing, http://jan.ucc.nau.edu/˜daa/lecture/pft.htm, last accessed Aug. 23, 2004, 8 pages.
Purerfellner, Helmut and Martinek, Martin. Pulmonary vein stenosis following catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Current Opinion in Cardiology. 20; pp. 484-490. 2005.
Purerfellner, Helmut et al., Pulmonary Vein Stenosis by Ostial Irrigated-Tip Ablation: Incidence, Time Course, and Prediction, Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology. vol. 14, No. 2, Feb. 2003. pp. 158-164.
Raji, A. R. M. and R. E. M. Bowden, Effects of High-Peak Pulsed Electromagnetic Field on the Degeneration and Regeneration of the Common Peroneal Nerve in Rats, The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery Aug. 1983, vol. 65-B, No. 4, 1983 British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery, pp. 478-492.
Ram, C. Venkata S., M.D., Understanding refractory hypertension, May 15, 2004, Patient Care May 2004, vol. 38, pp. 12-16, 7 pages from http://www.patientcareonline.com/patcare/content/printContentPopup.jsp?id=108324.
Ravalia, A. et al., Tachyphylaxis and epidural anaesthesia, Edgware General Hospital, Correspondence, p. 529, Jun. 1989.
Renal Parenchymal Disease, Ch. 26, 5th Edition Heart Disease, A Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine vol. 2, Edited by Eugene Braunwald, WB Saunders Company, pp. 824-825 1997.
Ribstein, Jean and Michael H. Humphreys, Renal nerves and cation excretion after acute reduction in functioning renal mass in the rat, Sep. 22, 1983, Am. J. Physiol., vol. 246, 1984 the American Physiological Society, pp. F260-F265.
Richebe, Philippe, M.D. et al., Immediate Early Genes after Pulsed Radiofrequency Treatment: Neurobiology in Need of Clinical Trials, Oct. 13, 2004, Anesthesiology Jan. 2005, vol. 102, No. 1, 2004 American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc., pp. 1-3.
Rihal, Charanjit S. et al., Incidence and Prognostic Importance of Acute Renal Failure After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Mar. 6, 2002, Circulation May 14, 2002, vol. 10, 2002 American Heart Association, Inc., pp. 2259-2264.
Rosen, S.M. et al., Relationship of Vascular Reactivity to Plasma Renin Concentration in Patients with Terminal Renal Failure, Proc. Dialysis Transplant Forum 1974, pp. 45-47.
Roth, Bradley J. and Peter J. Basser, A Model of the Stimulation of a Nerve Fiber by Electromagnetic Induction, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 37, No. 6, Jun. 1990, pp. 588-597.
Rudin, Asa, M.D. et al., Postoperative Epidural or Intravenous Analgesia after Major Abdominal or Thoraco-Abdominal Surgery, The Journal of the American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc., Anesthesiology 2001, vol. 95, A-970, 1 page.
Rudnick, Michael R. et al., Contrast-induced nephropathy: How it develops, how to prevent it, Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine Jan. 2006, vol. 73, No. 1, pp. 75-87.
Rump, L.C., The Role of Sympathetic Nervous Activity in Chronic Renal Failure, J Clinical Basic Cardiology 2001, vol. 4, pp. 179-182.
Ruohonen, Jarmo et al., Modeling Peripheral Nerve Stimulation Using Magnetic Fields, Journal of the Peripheral Nervous System, vol. 2, No. 1, 1997, Woodland Publications 1997, pp. 17-29.
Saad, Eduardo B. et al., Pulmonary Vein Stenosis After Radiofrequency Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: Functional Characterization, Evolution, and Influence of the Ablation Strategy, Circulation. 108; pp. 3102-3107. 2003.
Sabbah, Hani N., Animal Models for Heart Failure and Device Development, Henry Ford Health System. 24 slides, Oct. 17, 2005.
Schauerte, P et al., Focal atrial fibrillation: experimental evidence for a pathophysiologic role of the autonomic nervous system, Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology. 12(5). May 2001. Abstract only. 2 pgs.
Schauerte, P et al., Catheter ablation of cardiac autonomic nerves for prevention of vagal atrial fibrillation, Circulation. 102(22). Nov. 28, 2000. Abstract only. 2 pgs.
Schauerte, P et al., Transvenous parasympathetic nerve stimulation in the inferior vena cava and atrioventricular conduction, Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology. 11(1). Jan. 2000. Abstract only. 2 pgs.
Scheiner, Avram, Ph.D., The design, development and implementation of electrodes used for functional electrial stimulation, Thesis paper, Case Western Reserve University, May 1992, 220 pages.
Scherlag, BJ and Po, S., The intrinsic cardiac nervous system and atrial fibrillation, Current Opinion in Cardiology. 21(1):51-54, Jan. 2006. Abstract only. 2 pgs.
Schlaich, M.P. et al., Relation between cardiac sympathetic activity and hypertensive left ventricular hypertrophy. Circulation. 2003;108:560-5.
Schlaich, M.P. et al., Sympathetic augmentation in hypertension: role of nerve firing, norepinephrine reuptake, and angiotensin neuromodulation, Hypertension, 2004, 43:169-175.
Schmitt, Joseph et al., Intravascular Optical Coherence Tomography—Opening a Window into Coronary Artery Disease, LightLab Imaging, Inc. Business Briefing: European Cardiology 2005.
Schoenbach, Karl H. et al, Intracellular Effect of Ultrashort Electrical Pulses, Dec. 26, 2000, Bioelectromagnetics, vol. 22, 2001, Wiley-Liss, Inc. 2001, pp. 440-448.
Schrier, Robert et al., Cardiac and Renal Effects of Standard Versus Rigorous Blood Pressure Control in Autosomal-Dominant Polycistic Kidney Disease, Mar. 23, 2002, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, American Society of Nephrology 2002, pp. 1733-1739.
Scremin, Oscar U., M.D., Ph.D. and Daniel P. Holschneider, M.D., 31 & 32 . . . An Implantable Bolus Infusion Pump for the Neurosciences, FRP, Apr. 2005, 3 pages.
Sensorcaine—MPF Spinal Injection, informational document, AstraZeneca 2001, 2 pgs.
Shah, D.C., Haissaguerre, M., Jais, P., Catheter ablation of pulmonary vein foci for atrial fibrillation: pulmonary vein foci ablation for atrial firbrillation, Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 1999, 47 (suppl. 3): 352-356.
Shannon, J.L. et al., Studies on the innervation of human renal allografts, J Pathol. 1998, vol. 186, pp. 109-115.
Shlipak, M.G. et al., The clinical challenge of cardiorenal syndrome. Circulation. 2004;110:1514-7.
Shupak, Naomi M., Therapeutic Uses of Pulsed Magnetic-Field Exposure: A Review, Radio Science Bulletin Dec. 2003, No. 307, pp. 9-32.
Shu-Qing, Liu et al., Old spinal cord injury treated by pulsed electric stimulation, General Hospital of Beijing Command, Beijing, Dec. 6, 1990, 5 pages (full article in Chinese; abstract on last page).
Siegel, RJ et al., Clinical demonstration that catheter-delivered ultrasound energy reverses arterial vasoconstriction, Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 1992. 20; 732-735. Summary only. 2 pgs.
Simpson, B. et al., Implantable spinal infusion devices for chronic pain and spasticity: an accelerated systematic review, ASERNIP-S Report No. 42, Adelaide, South Australia, ASERNIP-S, May 2003, 56 pages.
Sisken, B.F. et al., 229.17 Influence of Non-Thermal Pulsed Radiofrequency Fields (PRF) on Neurite Outgrowth, Society for Neuroscience, vol. 21, 1995, 2 pages.
Skeie, B. et al., Effect of chronic bupivacaine infusion on seizure threshold to bupivacaine, Dec. 28, 1986, Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1987, vol. 31, pp. 423-425.
Skopec, M., A Primer on Medical Device Interactions with Magnetic Resonance Imaging Systems, Feb. 4, 1997, CDRH Magnetic Resonance Working Group, U.S. Department of Heatlh and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Updated May 23, 1997, 17 pages, http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/ode/primerf6.html, (last accessed Jan. 23, 2006.
Slappendel, Robert et al., The efficacy of radiofrequency lesioning of the cervical spinal dorsal root ganglion in a double blinded randomized study, Jun. 26, 1997, Pain 73, 1997 International Association for the Study of Pain, Elsevier Science B.V., pp. 159-163.
Sluijter, M.D., Ph.D., Pulsed Radiofrequency, May 17, 2005, Anesthesiology Dec. 2005, vol. 103, No. 6, 2005 American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc., pp. 1313-1314.
Sluijter, M.D., Ph.D., Radiofrequency Part 1: The Lumbosacral Region, Chapter 1 Mechanisms of Chronic Pain and part of Chapter 2 Spinal Pain, 2001 FlivoPress SA, Meggen (LU), Switzerland, pp. 1-26.
Sluijter, M.D., Ph.D., Radiofrequency Part 2: Thoracic and Cervical Region, Headache and Facial Pain, various pages from, FlivoPress SA, Meggen (LU), Switzerland, 13 pages 2002.
Sluijter, M.D., Ph.D., The Role of Radiofrequency in Failed Back Surgery Patients, Current Review of Pain 2000, vol. 4, 2000 by Current Science Inc., pp. 49-53.
Smithwick, R.H. et al., Hypertension and associated cardiovascular disease: comparison of male and female mortality rates and their influence on selection of therapy, JAMA, 1956, 160:1023-1033.
Smithwick, R.H. et al., Splanchnicectomy for essential hypertension, Journal Am Med Assn, 1953;152:1501-1504.
Smithwick, R.H., Surgical treatment of hypertension, Am J Med 1948, 4:744-759.
Sobotka, Paul A., Treatment Strategies for Fluid Overload, CHF Patients, CHF Solutions. Transcatheter Cardiovascular Therapeutics 2005. 20 slides.
Solis-Herruzo, J.A. et al., Effects of lumbar sympathetic block on kidney function in cirrhotic patients with hepatorenal syndrome, Journal of Hepatology, 1987; 5: 167-173.
Souza, D.R.B. et al., Chronic experimental myocardial infarction produces antinatriuresis by a renal nerve-dependent mechanism, Oct. 14, 2003, Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research 2004, vol. 37, pp. 285-293.
Standl, Thomas, M.D., et al., Patient-controlled epidural analgesia reduces analgesic requirements compared to continuous epidural infusion after major abdominal surgery, Aug. 29, 2002, Canada Journal of Anesthesia 2003, vol. 50 (3), pp. 258-264.
Steffen, W. et al., Catheter-delivered high intensity, low frequency ultrasound induces vasodilation in vivo, European Heart Journal. 1994. 15; pp. 369-376.
Steg, PG et al., Pulsed ultraviolet laser irradiation produces endothelium-independent relaxation of vascular smooth muscle, Circulation: Journal of the American Heart Association. 1989. pp. 189-197.
Stone, Gregg W., M.D. et al., Fenoldopam Mesylate for the Prevention of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy, JAMA Nov. 5, 2003, vol. 290, No. 17, 2003 American Medical Association, pp. 2284-2291.
Strojek, K. et al., Lowering of microalbuminuria in diabetic patients by a sympathicoplegic agent: novel approach to prevent progression of diabetic nephropathy? J Am Soc Nephrol. 2001;12:602-5.
Summary, Critical Reviews in Biomedical Engineering, vol. 17, Issue 5, 1989, pp. 515-529.
Sung, Duk Hyun, M.D. et al., Phenol Block of Peripheral Nerve Conduction: Titrating for Optimum Effect, Jun. 27, 2000, Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. vol. 82, May 2001, pp. 671-676.
Taka, Tomomi et al., Impaired Flow-Mediated Vasodilation in vivo and Reduced Shear-Induced Platelet Reactivity in vitro in Response to Nitric Oxide in Prothrombotic, Stroke-Prone Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats, Pathophysiology of Haemostasis and Thrombosis. Dec. 23, 2002. pp. 184-189.
Taler, Sandra J. et al., Resistant Hypertension, Comparing Hemodynamic Management to Specialist Care, Mar. 12, 2002, Hypertension 2002, vol. 39, 2002 American Heart Association, Inc., pp. 982-988.
Tamborero, David et al., Incidence of Pulmonary Vein Stenosis in Patients Submitted to Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: A Comparison of the Selective Segmental Ostial Ablation vs. the Circumferential Pulmonary Veins Ablation, Journal of Intervocational Cardiac Electrophysiology. 14; pp. 41-25. 2005.
Tay, Victoria KM, et al., Computed tomography fluoroscopy-guided chemical lumbar sympathectomy: Simple, safe and effective, Oct. 31, 2001, Diagnostic Radiology, Australasian Radiology 2002, vol. 46, pp. 163-166.
Terashima, Mitsuyasu et al. Feasibility and Safety of a Novel CryoPlasty™ System. Poster. 1 page, Mar. 15, 2002.
Thatipelli et al., CT Angiography of Renal Artery Anatomy for Evaluating Embolic Protection Devices, Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Jul. 2007, pp. 842-846.
The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial, ALLHAT Research Group, JAMA, 2002, vol. 288, pp. 2981-2997.
Thomas, John R. and Oakley, E. Howard N. Chapter 15: Nonfreezing Cold Injury Medical Aspects of Harsh Environments, vol. 1. pp. 467-490, 2001.
Thompson, Gregory W., et al., Bradycardia Induced by Intravascular Versus Direct Stimulation of the Vagus Nerve, Aug. 24, 1997, the Society of Thoracic Surgeons 1998, pp. 637-642.
Thrasher, Terry N., Unloading arterial baroreceptors causes neurogenic hypertension, Dec. 4, 2001, Am J. Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, vol. 282, 2002 the American Physiological Society, pp. R1044-R1053.
Tokuno, Hajime A. et al., Local anesthetic effects of cocaethylene and isopropylcocaine on rat peripheral nerves, Oct. 7, 2003, Brain Research 996, 2004, Elsevier B.V. 2003, pp. 159-167.
Trapani, Angelo J. et al., Neurohumoral interactions in conscious dehydrated rabbit, Am. J. Physiol. 254, 1988, the American Physiological Society 1988, pp. R338-R347.
Trock, David H. et al., The Effect of Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields in the Treatment of Osteoarthritis of the Knee and Cervical Spine. Report of Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled Trials, Mar. 22, 1994, The Journal of Rheumatology 1994, vol. 21, pp. 1903-1911.
Troiano, Gregory C. et al., The Reduction in Electroporation Voltages by the Addition of a Surfactant to Planar Lipid Bilayers, May 12, 1998, Biophysical Journal, vol. 75, Aug. 1998, the Biophysical Society 1998, pp. 880-888.
Trumble, Dennis R. and James A. MaGovern, Comparison of Dog and Pig Models for Testing Substernal Cardiac Compression Devices, Nov. 2003, ASAIO Journal 2004, pp. 188-192.
Tsai, E., Intrathecal drug delivery for pain indications, technique, results, Pain Lecture presentation, Jun. 8, 2001, 31 pages.
Uematsu, Toshihiko, M.D., Ph.D., F.I.C.A. et al., Extrinsic Innervation of the Canine Superior Vena Cava, Pulmonary, Portal and Renal Veins, Angiology—Journal of Vascular Diseases, Aug. 1984, pp. 486-493.
United States Renal Data System, USRDS 2003 Annual Data Report: Atlas of End-Stage Renal Disease in the United States, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, 2003, 593 pages.
Upadhyay, Pramod, Electroporation of the skin to deliver antigen by using a piezo ceramic gas igniter, Jan. 27, 2001, International Journal of Pharmaceutics, vol. 217, 2001 Elsevier Science B.V., pp. 249-253.
Valente, John F. et al., Laparoscopic renal denervation for intractable ADPKD-related pain, Aug. 24, 2000, Nephrol Dial Transplant 2001, vol. 16, European Renal Association—European Dialysis and Transplant Association, p. 160.
Van Antwerp, Bill and Poonam Gulati, Protein Delivery from Mechanical Devices Challenges and Opportunities, Medtronic presentation, 19 pages, Jul. 2003.
Velazquez, Eric J., An international perspective on heart failure and left ventricular systolic dysfunction complicating myocardial infarction: the VALIANT registry, Aug. 5, 2004, European Heart Journal vol. 25, 2004 Elsevier, pp. 1911-1919.
Velez-Roa, Sonia, M.D. et al., Peripheral Sympathetic Control During Dobutamine Infusion: Effects of Aging and Heart Failure, Jul. 7, 2003, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 42, No. 9, 2003, American College of Cardiology Foundation 2003, pp. 1605-1610.
Villarreal, Daniel et al., Effects of renal denervation on postprandial sodium excretion in experimental heart failure, Oct. 29, 1993, Am J Physiol 266, 1994, pp. R1599-R1604.
Villarreal, Daniel et al., Neurohumoral modulators and sodium balance in experimental heart failure, Nov. 6, 1992, Am. J. Physiol, vol. 264, 1993, pp. H1187-H1193.
Vonend, O. et al., Moxonidine treatment of hypertensive patients with advanced renal failure. J Hypertens. 2003;21:1709-17.
Wagner, C.D. et al., Very low frequency oscillations in arterial blood pressure after autonomic blockade in conscious dogs, Feb. 5, 1997, Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 1997, vol. 272, 1997 the American Physiological Society, pp. 2034-2039.
Wald, Jan D., Ph.D, et al., Cardiology Update: 2003, Sep. 11, 2003, AG Edwards 2003, 120 pages.
Wang, Xi et al., Alterations of adenylyl cyclase and G proteins in aortocaval shunt-induced heart failure, Jul. 2004, Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol vol. 287, 2004 the American Physiological Society, pp. H118-H125.
Weaver, James C., Chapter 1 Electroporation Theory, Concepts and Mechanisms, Methods in Molecular Biology, vol. 55, Plant Cell Electroporation and Electrofusion Protocols, Edited by J.A. Nickoloff, Humana Press Inc., pp. 3-28, 1995.
Weaver, James C., Electroporation: A General Phenomenon for Manipulating Cells and Tissues, Oct. 22, 1992, Journal of Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 51, 1993 Wiley-Liss, Inc., pp. 426-435.
Weiner, Richard L., M.D., Peripheral nerve neurostimulation, Neurosurg. Clin. N. Am. vol. 14, 2003, Elsevier, Inc. 2003, pp. 401-408.
Weisbord, Steven D., M.D. and Paul M. Palevsky, M.D., Radiocontrast-Induced Acute Renal Failure, Jul. 10, 2004, Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2005, vol. 20 (2), 2005 Sage Publications, pp. 63-75.
Whitelaw, G.P., Kinsey, D., Smithwick, R.H., Factors influencing the choice of treatment in essential hypertension: surgical, medical, or a combination of both, Am J Surg, 1964, 107:220-231.
Wilson, D.H. et al., The Effects of Pulsed Electromagnetic Energy on Peripheral Nerve Regeneration, Annals New York Academy of Sciences, Oct. 1974, pp. 575-585.
Wolinsky, Harvey, M.D. PhD and Swan N. Thung, M.D., Use of a Perforated Balloon Catheter to Deliver Concentrated Heparin Into the Wall of the Normal Canine Artery, Aug. 30, 1989, JACC 1990, vol. 15, 1990 by the American College of Cardiology, pp. 475-481.
Wyss, J. Michael et al., Neuronal control of the kidney: Contribution to hypertension, Apr. 8, 1991, Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 1992;70: 759-770.
Yamaguchi, Jun-ichi, M.D. et al., Prognostic Significance of Serum Creatinine Concentration for In-Hospital Mortality in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction Who Underwent Successful Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (from the Heart Institute of Japan Acute Myocardial Infarction [HIJAMI] Registry), Feb. 24, 2004, The American Journal of Cardiology vol. 93, Jun. 15, 2004, 2004 by Excerpta Medica, Inc., pp. 1526-1528.
Ye, Richard D., M.D., Ph.D., Pharmacology of the Peripheral Nervous System, E-425 MSB, 6 pages, Jan. 2000.
Ye, S. et al., A limited renal injury may cause a permanent form of neurogenic hypertension. Am J Hypertens. 1998;11:723-8.
Ye, Shaohua et al., Renal Injury Caused by Intrarenal Injection of Pheno Increases Afferent and Efferent Renal Sympathetic Nerve Activity, Mar. 12, 2002, American Journal of Hypertension, Aug. 2002, vol. 15, No. 8, 2002 the American Journal of Hypertension, Ltd. Published by Elsevier Science Inc., pp. 717-724.
Yong-Quan, Dong et al., The therapeutic effect of pulsed electric field on experimental spinal cord injury, Beijing Army General Hospital of People's Liberation Army, Beijing, 5 pages (full article in Chinese; abstract on last page) Mar. 30, 1992.
Young, James B., M.D., FACC, Management of Chronic Heart Failure: What Do Recent Clinical Trials Teach Us?, Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine, vol. 5, Suppl. 1, 2004, MedReviews, LLC 2004, pp. S3-S9.
Yu, Wen-Chung et al. Acquired Pulmonary Vein Stenosis after Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology. vol. 12, No. 8.
Zanchetti, A. et al., Neural Control of the Kidney—Are There Reno-Renal Reflexes?, Clin. and Exper. Hyper. Theory and Practice, A6 (1&2), 1984, Marcel Dekker, Inc. 1984, pp. 275-286.
Zanchetti, A. et al., Practice Guidelines for Primary Care Physicians: 2003 ESH/ESC Hypertension Guidelines, Journal of Hypertension, vol. 21, No. 10, 2003, pp. 1779-1786.
Zanchetti, A.S., Neural regulation of renin release: Experimental evidence and clinical implications in arterial hypertension, Circulation, 1977, 56(5) 691-698.
Zimmermann, Ulrich, Electrical Breakdown, Electropermeabilization and Electrofusion, Rev. Physiol. Biochem. Pharmacol., vol. 105, Springer-Verlag 1986, pp. 175-256.
Zoccali, C. et al., Plasma norepinephrine predicts survival and incident cardiovascular events in patients with end-stage renal disease. Circulation. 2002;105:1354-9.
Zucker, Irving H. et al., The origin of sympathetic outflow in heart failure: the roles of angiotensin II and nitric oxide, Progress in Biophysics & Molecular Biology, vol. 84, 2004, Elsevier Ltd. 2003, pp. 217-232.
Zundert, Jan Van, M.D. Fipp and Alex Cahana, M.D. Daapm, Pulsed Radiofrequency in Chronic Pain Management: Looking for the Best Use of Electrical Current, Pain Practice 2005, vol. 5, Issue 2, 2005 World Institute of Pain, pp. 74-76.
Page, et al., “The Effect of Renal Denervation on Patients Suffering from Nephritis”, J. Clin. Invest., 1935, vol. 14 (4), pp. 443-458.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20170348050 A1 Dec 2017 US
Provisional Applications (6)
Number Date Country
60616254 Oct 2004 US
60624793 Nov 2004 US
60442970 Jan 2003 US
60415575 Oct 2002 US
60370190 Apr 2002 US
60813589 Dec 2005 US
Divisions (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 11403329 Apr 2006 US
Child 13371285 US
Continuations (5)
Number Date Country
Parent 15231517 Aug 2016 US
Child 15623428 US
Parent 15075789 Mar 2016 US
Child 15231517 US
Parent 14611651 Feb 2015 US
Child 15075789 US
Parent 13958450 Aug 2013 US
Child 14611651 US
Parent 13371285 Feb 2012 US
Child 13958450 US
Continuation in Parts (5)
Number Date Country
Parent 11129765 May 2005 US
Child 11403329 US
Parent 10408665 Apr 2003 US
Child 11129765 US
Parent 11189563 Jul 2005 US
Child 11403329 US
Parent 11266993 Nov 2005 US
Child 11189563 US
Parent 11363867 Feb 2006 US
Child 11266993 US