The disclosure relates to techniques for repairing dual walled metallic components using a braze material.
Dual walled components may be used in high temperature mechanical systems, such as gas turbine engines. A dual walled component may include a spar, which provides structural support and is the main load bearing element of the dual walled component. The spar may include a plurality of pedestals to which a coversheet or outer wall is attached. The coversheet defines the outer surface of the dual walled component, and may function as a heat shield. Cooling fluid, such as air, may be passed through the volume between the spar and the back side of the coversheet to aid in cooling the coversheet. Due to this back side cooling, dual walled components may allow use of higher operating temperatures than single walled components.
In some examples, the disclosure described a method for repairing a dual walled component comprising a spar comprising a plurality of pedestals and a coversheet attached to the plurality of pedestals. The method may include removing a damaged portion of the coversheet from the dual walled component to expose a plurality of exposed pedestals and define a repair location and an adjacent coversheet portion. The method also may include filling space between the plurality of exposed pedestals with a stop material, wherein the stop material defines a surface substantially aligned with a pedestal-contacting surface of the adjacent coversheet portion. In some examples, the method additionally includes positioning a braze material on the surface of the stop material and attaching the braze material to the plurality of exposed pedestals and adjacent coversheet portion to form a repaired coversheet portion.
In some examples, the disclosure describes a dual walled component that includes a spar including a plurality of pedestals, a coversheet attached to a first set of pedestals from the plurality of pedestals, and a repaired coversheet portion attached to a second set of pedestals from the plurality of pedestals and to the coversheet. The repaired coversheet portion includes a braze material.
The details of one or more examples are set forth in the accompanying drawings and the description below. Other features, objects, and advantages will be apparent from the description and drawings, and from the claims.
The disclosure describes techniques for repairing a dual walled component using a braze patch. As described above, a dual walled component includes a spar and a coversheet or outer wall. The spar may include a plurality of pedestals to which the coversheet is attached.
Although the dual walled component may allow use of high temperatures due to the cooling provided by the back side cooling channels, the coversheet may be relatively thin. Because of this, the coversheet may be relatively easily damaged, e.g., by mechanical impact or chemical reaction with species in the operating environment, such as calcia-magnesia-alumina-silicate (CMAS). Further, because the coversheet is relatively thin and the pedestals are relatively small (e.g., thousandths of an inch), repair of the coversheet may be relatively difficult. Hence, some damaged dual walled components may be discarded rather than repaired.
In accordance with examples of this disclosure, a braze material may be used to repair the coversheet and, in some examples, the pedestals of a dual walled component. For example, a portion of a coversheet may be damaged by mechanical impact with an object or reaction with a chemical species in the operating environment of the dual walled component. The damaged portion may be removed along with, in some examples, part of an undamaged portion of the coversheet adjacent to the damaged portion to define a repair location. Removing the damaged portion of the coversheet may expose some pedestals of the spar. A braze material then may be attached to the plurality of exposed pedestals and adjacent coversheet and form a repaired coversheet portion.
In some examples, space between the plurality of exposed pedestals may be filled with a stop material. The stop material may define a surface substantially aligned with a pedestal-contacting surface of the adjacent coversheet portion, so that an inner surface (a surface toward the pedestals) of the repaired coversheet portion will be substantially aligned with the inner (pedestal-contacting) surface of the adjacent coversheet portion. After the stop material is filled in the space, braze material, either in the form of a braze preform or a braze paste may be positioned on the surface of the stop material and adjacent to the exposed pedestals and adjacent coversheet, to form the repaired coversheet portion attached to the exposed pedestals and the adjacent coversheet. The braze material then may be heated to join the braze material to the exposed pedestals and adjacent coversheet. In this way, the techniques described herein may be used to repair a dual walled component with a braze material.
Coversheet 32 is shaped to substantially correspond to an outer surface of spar 34. In some examples, coversheet 32 and spar 34 may be formed of similar materials, such as similar alloys. In other examples, coversheet 32 and spar 34 may be formed of different materials, selected to provide different properties. For example, spar 34 may be formed of a material selected to provide strength to dual walled component 30, while coversheet 32 is formed of a material selected to provide resistance to oxidation or a relatively low coefficient of thermal expansion. In some examples, the alloys from which coversheet 32 and spar 34 are formed may include a Ni-based alloy, a Co-based alloy, a Ti-based alloy, or the like.
Spar 34 may also include a plurality of pedestals on an outer surface of the walls of spar 34, to which coversheet 32 are joined. The plurality of pedestals may help define channels between spar 34 and coversheet 32 through which cooling fluid (e.g., air) may flow. In some examples, coversheet 32 and spar 34 include one or more locating features 38 including protrusion 40 of coversheet 32 and complementary depression 42 of spar 34. The locating features 38 may assist with positioning coversheet 32 relative to spar 34.
In some examples, an external surface (opposite plurality of pedestals 56) of coversheet 58 may coated with a coating 60, which may include, for example, a thermal barrier coating. A thermal barrier coating may include a bond coat on coversheet 58 and a thermally insulative layer on the bond coat. The thermally insulative layer may include, for example, yttria or hafnia partially or fully stabilized with a rare earth oxide, such as yttria.
Coversheet 58 also may include a plurality of film cooling holes 62. Each of plurality of film cooling holes 62 may extend from an outer surface to an inner surface of coversheet 58. Each of plurality of film cooling holes 62 fluidically connects to a cavity defined by coversheet 58 and spar 54. Cooling fluid, such as air, may flow through the cavity and exit through film cooling holes 62 to help cool coversheet 58.
Damaged dual walled component 52 includes a damaged portion 64. In the example illustrated in
As described briefly above, the braze material used in the repair technique illustrated in
The measured dimensional surface data then can be compared to surface model data of dual walled component 52, or at least the portion of coversheet 58 that includes damaged portion 64, and, optionally, the adjacent portion of coversheet 58 to generate a compromise surface model. The surface model data can include any suitable mathematical model, for example, in the form of one or more curves or surfaces, including splines or non-uniform rational basis splines (NURBS), for example, that represent (model) the airfoil spar surface. In some examples, the surface model data can include a design intent surface of dual walled component 52, defined by, for example, CAD spline knots. In some examples, the design intent surface can represent the ideal surface of dual walled component 52, that is the “perfect world” representation of the component surface, before, for example, the consideration of tolerances, and before the damage to coversheet 58 that resulted in damaged portion 64.
In some examples, the surface model data may be modified to arrive at the compromise surface model by performing a six degree of freedom (DOF) best-fit of surface model data to the measured dimensional surface data. In some examples, the surface model data may be best-fit to the measured dimensional surface data to account for possible misalignment caused by, for example, uncertainty in the orientation of dual walled component 52 during measurement of the dimensional surface data. Alternatively, the measured dimensional surface data may be best-fit to the surface model data to arrive at the compromise surface model.
In some examples, the compromise surface model may be determined using any suitable numerical analysis. For example, a weighted nonlinear least squares minimization to rotate and translate the surface model data to arrive at the compromise surface model. Further, any suitable techniques for solving multidimensional nonlinear problems can be employed; non-limiting examples include Newton-Raphson, sequential over-relaxation, genetic algorithms, gradient methods, among others.
In some examples, when determining the compromise surface model, the geometry of damaged portion 64 may be discarded, as the geometry of damaged portion 64 may deviate so significantly from the surface model data to be unrepresentative of the original shape of coversheet. In some such examples, the measured dimensional data of the adjacent portion of coversheet 58 may be compared to the surface model data to arrive at a compromise surface model for that portion of the braze preform, and the surface model data may be used for the compromise surface model for damaged portion 64.
Once the compromise surface model has been determined, a sintered braze material may be machined to define the braze preform. In other examples, adaptive machining may not be used to form the braze preform, and the braze preform may have a shape defined by the model surface data or a generic shape (e.g., a sheet). In still other examples, the technique of
The technique of
Removing damaged portion 64 (14) may include the damaged portion 64 of the coversheet 58, and, in some examples, an undamaged adjacent portion of coversheet 58, as shown in
In some examples, in addition to coversheet 58 being damaged, at least some of the plurality of pedestals 56 may be damaged, as shown in
Removing damaged portion 64 of dual walled component 52 (14) may include using mechanical techniques, such as grinding, drilling, cutting, or the like to remove the damaged portion 64. Removing damaged portion 64 of dual walled component 52 (14) may define a repair location 74 (
The technique of
Stop material 82 may include a high melting temperature refractive material that does not react with adjacent portions of dual walled component 52 (e.g., exposed pedestal 78, plurality of pedestals 56, spar 54, and/or coversheet 58). For example, the high melting temperature refractive material may have a melting temperature greater than the temperature at which the braze material is heated to join the braze material to coversheet 58 and exposed pedestal 78. For example, stop material 82 may include an oxide, such as yttrium oxide, aluminum oxide, or the like, mixed with a binder. The binder may include, for example, a water- or alcohol-based binder. In some examples, stop material 82 that includes an oxide and a binder may be in the form of a tape, a preform, a rope, a powder, or the like.
In other examples, stop material 82 may include a refractory metal, such as molybdenum; or the like. The refractory metal may be in the form of a sheet or other preform. In some examples, the tape, preform, or rope may be shaped to define the outer surface of stop material 82 substantially aligned with an inner surface of the adjacent portions of coversheet 58 and, if applicable, to help define a shape of any portions of exposed pedestal 78 to be repaired. Alternatively or additionally, the tape, preform, or rope may be shaped to define the outer surface of stop material 82 substantially aligned with tops of undamaged exposed pedestals.
The technique of
In some examples, the braze material may include a braze preform. The braze preform may define a shape that substantially conforms to the shape of the portion of coversheet 58 that was removed when removing damaged portion 64. A braze preform may reduce shrinkage compared to a braze paste, and thus may improve a fit of braze material 92 to coversheet 58. The braze preform may be positioned on stop material 82 by placing the braze preform at repair location 74.
In other examples, braze material 92 may include a powder, a paste (e.g., powder carried by a solvent), a rod, a ribbon, a wire, or the like. Braze material 92 may not be preformed to substantially conform to the shape of the portion of coversheet 58 that was removed when removing damaged portion 64. Braze material 92 may be positioned using any of a variety of techniques, including, for example, spreading; dispensing with a syringe; positioning individual ribbons, wires, or rods; or the like. In some examples, after positioning braze material 92, the braze material 92 may substantially conform to the shape of the portion of coversheet 58 that was removed when removing damaged portion 64, even if braze material 92 does not include a braze preform.
Braze material 92 may include any suitable braze composition, such as a metal or an alloy. For example, if coversheet 58 includes a Ni- or Co-based superalloy, braze material 92 may include a braze of similar composition. In other examples, braze material 92 may include an alloy having a different composition than coversheet 58. For example, damaged portion 64 may be have been damaged due to localized conditions, such as higher temperatures, exposure to certain environmental contaminants, or higher mechanical stresses, which are not common to all portions of coversheet 58. In some such examples, braze material 92 may include an alloy having a composition selected to better resist the localized conditions compared to the alloy from which the remainder of coversheet 58 is formed. Regardless of the composition of braze material 92 compared to coversheet 58, the composition of braze material 92 may be selected such that the coefficient of thermal expansion is sufficiently similar that thermal cycling of dual walled component 52 does not result in sufficient levels of stress to cause of the interface between coversheet 58 and braze material 92 to crack or fail.
In some examples, braze material 92 may include a wide gap braze composition, which includes particles of a high temperature alloy within mixed with a braze alloy comparable to the high temperature alloy constituents. For example, a wide gap braze composition may include a nickel-based braze mixed with particles of a nickel-based superalloy or a cobalt-based braze mixed with particles of a cobalt-based alloy.
Regardless of the braze material 92 used, attaching braze material 92 to coversheet 58 and at least one exposed pedestal 78 (18) may also include heating at least the braze material 92 to cause the braze material 92 to join to coversheet 58 and at least one exposed pedestal 78. For example, at least the braze material 92 may be heated to a temperature between about 1,500° F. (about 815° C.) and about 2,400° F. (about 1315° C.) to cause the braze material 92 to join to coversheet 58 and at least one exposed pedestal 78. In some examples, dual walled component 52 and braze material 92 may be enclosed in a vacuum furnace, and both dual walled component 52 and braze material 92 may be heated within the vacuum furnace. Vacuum brazing may result in substantial temperature uniformity within dual walled component 52 and braze material 92, which may reduce residual stresses at the interface of dual walled component 52 and braze material 92.
In some examples, induction heating may be used to heat braze material 92. For example, induction heating may be substantially localized to braze material 92, leaving substantially all of dual walled component at a lower temperature than the braze temperature. Localized heating of braze material 92 using induction heating may reduce dimensional nonconformance of dual walled component 52, which may occur if all of dual walled component 52 is heated during the brazing technique.
After formation of the repaired coversheet portion, stop material 82 may be removed. For example, dual walled component 52 may be heated to heat stop material 82 in examples in which stop material 82 includes a refractory oxide and a binder. Stop material 82 may be heated to a temperature sufficient to burn the binder, creating a powder including the burned binder and the refractive oxide. This powder then may be removed, e.g., by flowing a pressurized fluid through the cavities between coversheet 58 and spar 74. In other examples, such as examples in which stop material 82 includes a refractory metal, a chemical etching technique may be used to remove stop material 82. The etchant may be selected to react with the refractory metal while not reacting with the parts of dual walled component 52.
As shown in
Additionally or alternatively, the technique of
In an adaptive machining technique, a non-contact technique may be used to inspect repaired coversheet portion 82 and, optionally, an adjacent portion of coversheet 58, to obtain dimensional surface data of repaired coversheet portion 82. In some examples, the non-contact technique may utilize a coordinate measuring machine (CMM) that determines coordinates of points at multiple locations of repaired coversheet portion 82, and, optionally, an adjacent portion of coversheet 58. The measured dimensional surface data can include any number, or set or multiple sets, of point coordinates that the non-contact technique indicates are on the surface of repaired coversheet portion 82, and, optionally, an adjacent portion of coversheet 58, at various (different) locations. As will be appreciated, the greater the number of points, which can be in the hundreds to millions or more, in a set or multiple sets, the more robust the measured dimensional surface data will be in establishing the shape (and location) of repaired coversheet portion 82, and, optionally, an adjacent portion of coversheet 58.
The measured dimensional surface data then can be compared to surface model data of dual walled component 52, or at least the portion of coversheet 58 that includes repaired coversheet portion 82, and, optionally, the adjacent portion of coversheet 58 to generate a compromise surface model. The surface model data can include any suitable mathematical model, for example, in the form of one or more curves or surfaces, including splines or non-uniform rational basis splines (NURBS), for example, that represent (model) the airfoil spar surface. In some examples, the surface model data can include a design intent surface of dual walled component 52, defined by, for example, CAD spline knots. In some examples, the design intent surface can represent the ideal surface of dual walled component 52, that is the “perfect world” representation of the component surface, before, for example, the consideration of tolerances.
In some examples, the surface model data may be modified to arrive at the compromise surface model by performing a six degree of freedom (DOF) best-fit of surface model data to the measured dimensional surface data. In some examples, the surface model data may be best-fit to the measured dimensional surface data to account for possible misalignment caused by, for example, uncertainty in the orientation of dual walled component 52 during measurement of the dimensional surface data. Alternatively, the measured dimensional surface data may be best-fit to the surface model data to arrive at the compromise surface model.
In some examples, the compromise surface model may be determined using any suitable numerical analysis. For example, a weighted nonlinear least squares minimization to rotate and translate the surface model data to arrive at the compromise surface model. Further, any suitable techniques for solving multidimensional nonlinear problems can be employed; non-limiting examples include Newton-Raphson, sequential over-relaxation, genetic algorithms, gradient methods, among others.
Once the compromise surface model has been determined, repaired coversheet portion 82 and adjacent portions of coversheet 58 may be machined based on the compromise surface data.
In some examples, the technique of
In some examples, the technique of
As will be appreciated, in these ways a braze material may be used to repair coversheets and, optionally, pedestals of dual walled components, such as combustor liners or gas turbine engine blades. This may facilitate repair of dual walled components rather than requiring damaged dual walled components to be discarded and replaced with new dual walled components, thus providing cost savings.
Various examples have been described. These and other examples are within the scope of the following claims.
This application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/053,082, filed Feb. 25, 2016, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/121,269, filed Feb. 26, 2015. The entire contents of each of these applications are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3024109 | Hoppin, III et al. | Mar 1962 | A |
3517428 | Gadd | Jun 1970 | A |
3706203 | Goldberg et al. | Dec 1972 | A |
3806276 | Aspinwall | Apr 1974 | A |
3906617 | Behringer et al. | Sep 1975 | A |
4695247 | Enzaki et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
5100050 | Krueger et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5332360 | Correia et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5640767 | Jackson et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5797725 | Rhodes | Aug 1998 | A |
5976337 | Korinko et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6003754 | Rhodes | Dec 1999 | A |
6172327 | Aleshin et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6199746 | Dupree | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6213714 | Rhodes | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6214248 | Browning et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6575702 | Jackson et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6602053 | Subramanian et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6837417 | Srinivasan | Jan 2005 | B2 |
7051435 | Subramanian et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7080971 | Wilson et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7146725 | Kottilingam et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7484928 | Arness et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7731809 | Hu | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7761989 | Lutz et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7810237 | Lange et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7966707 | Szela et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8052391 | Brown | Nov 2011 | B1 |
8070450 | Ryznic | Dec 2011 | B1 |
8087565 | Kottilingam et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8247733 | Zhu | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8356409 | Perret | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8528208 | Rebak et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8539659 | Szela | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8555500 | Vossberg et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8739404 | Bunker et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8800298 | Ladd et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8875392 | Richter | Nov 2014 | B2 |
9003657 | Bunker et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9085980 | Mittendorf et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9174312 | Baughman et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9228958 | Shirkhodaie et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9254537 | Li et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9476306 | Bunker | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9751147 | Rhodes et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9810069 | Dubs et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9863249 | Shinn et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
10450871 | Henderkott et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10689984 | Varney | Jun 2020 | B2 |
20030026697 | Subramanian et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20040086635 | Grossklaus, Jr. et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20050217110 | Topal | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060120869 | Wilson | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070044306 | Szela et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070163684 | Hu | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20080011813 | Bucci et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20090026182 | Hu et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090194247 | Kriegl | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090196761 | James | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090255116 | McMasters et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090324841 | Arrell et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100176097 | Zhu | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100257733 | Guo et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110051179 | Iga | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110185739 | Bronson et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20120179285 | Melzer-Jokisch et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120222306 | Mittendorf et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130195674 | Watson | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20140003948 | Dubs et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140044939 | Hunt | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140169943 | Bunker et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140259666 | Baughman et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140271153 | Uskert | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140302278 | Bunker | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150016972 | Freeman et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150047168 | James et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150367456 | Ozbaysal et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150375322 | Salm et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150377037 | Salm et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160032766 | Bunker et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160177749 | Brandl et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160230576 | Freeman et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160250725 | Henderkott et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160339544 | Xu et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160375461 | Taylor | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170252870 | Cui et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20180073390 | Varney | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180073396 | Varney | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180093354 | Cui et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20190275617 | Bulgrin et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
105091030 | Nov 2015 | CN |
10319494 | Nov 2004 | DE |
102006005364 | Aug 2007 | DE |
102008007820 | Aug 2009 | DE |
102008058140 | May 2010 | DE |
1503144 | Feb 2005 | EP |
1528322 | May 2005 | EP |
1584702 | May 2005 | EP |
1803521 | Jul 2007 | EP |
1880793 | Jan 2008 | EP |
1884306 | Feb 2008 | EP |
2206575 | Jul 2010 | EP |
2578720 | Apr 2013 | EP |
2700788 | Feb 2014 | EP |
2713007 | Apr 2014 | EP |
2012092279 | Jul 2012 | WO |
2015147929 | Oct 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Extended European Search Report from counterpart European Application No. 16157440.0, dated Aug. 1, 7 pp. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/263,663, filed Sep. 13, 2016, by Bruce Varney. |
Response to Search Report dated Jul. 28, 2016, from counterpart European Application No. 16157440.5, filed Feb. 23, 2017, 9 pp. |
Notice of Intent to Grant from counterpart European Application No. 16157440.5, dated Nov. 22, 2017, 7 pp. |
Intent to Grant dated Mar. 29, 2018, from counterpart European Application No. 16157440.5, 29 pp. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/181,035, filed Nov. 5, 2018, by Henderkott et al. |
Notice of Eligibility for Grant dated Jan. 2, 2019, from counterpart Singaporean Application No. 10201601470P, 8 pp. |
Notice of Opposition, and translation thereof, from counterpart European Application No. 16157440.5, dated Jan. 23, 2019, 31 pp. |
Prosecution History from U.S. Appl. No. 15/053,082 dated Apr. 6, 2018 through May 13, 2020, 90 pgs. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200368857 A1 | Nov 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62121269 | Feb 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15053082 | Feb 2016 | US |
Child | 16984624 | US |