The present invention relates to the field of gas turbines, and in particular to a technique for refurbishing gas turbines.
In a gas turbine, gas is typically produced by the combustion of fuel. The gas is then passed over a collection of stationary nozzles, which discharge jets of gas against the blades of a turbine rotor, forcing the rotor to rotate. The rotation of the rotor drives the external load of the turbine, such as an electrical generator.
One problem with gas turbines is that the high temperatures in the turbine eventually cause degradation, such as burning, of packings or diaphragms, where the diaphragms are connected to the nozzles.
A technique for refurbishing nozzle diaphragm sections of a gas turbine replaces an eroded section of the nozzle diaphragm with a replacement part designed to engage a slot machined in the nozzle diaphragm. The replacement part is formed of a material that is capable of sustained exposure to higher temperature than the original eroded section, and with a similar coefficient of expansion as the material used for manufacture the original nozzle diaphragm. The combination of the nozzle diaphragm and the replacement part conform to the original manufacturer's dimensional specifications for the nozzle diaphragm.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate an implementation of apparatus and methods consistent with the present invention and, together with the detailed description, serve to explain advantages and principles consistent with the invention. In the drawings,
As stated above, a problem with some gas turbines, such as the General Electric Frame 7FA gas turbine, is that they operate at a temperature that can exceeds the ability of the materials used by the original equipment manufacturer to make the diaphragm. A conventional gas turbine nozzle is typically comprised of a plurality of nozzle segments 110, each of which has an associated diaphragm or packing member 120 attached to the nozzle segment, such as shown in
The nozzle segment 110 is typically manufactured from a high-temperature nickel-based superalloy or other similar material selected for its ability to withstand the high temperatures of hot gas in the turbine, which can reach approximately 2000° F. (1090° C.). The diaphragm 120 is attached radially interior to the vanes of the nozzle segment and forms an air seal around the rotor.
Because the diaphragm segments 120 are not directly exposed to the hot turbine gas, they are typically manufactured from a lower temperature material, such as a cast nickel-iron known in the art as a Ni-Resist (ASTM 439), which is an austenitic cast iron that is often used for heat and corrosion resistant applications. Although the diaphragm 120 is not directly exposed to the high heat, due to heat conduction through the nozzle segment 110 where the diaphragm 120 attaches to the nozzle segment 110, the diaphragm segments 120 often exceed the temperature limits of the Ni-Resist material, typically approximately 1500° F. (815° C.). The excessive temperature causes oxidation and erosion of the diaphragm segments 120, most commonly in the aft hook area 130, sometimes referred to as a rail section, where the diaphragm segment 120 attaches to the nozzle segment 110. This oxidation and erosion, sometimes referred to as burning of the rail section is typically discovered when the turbine is taken out of service for repair and refurbishment. Although the disclosure below and in the drawings is set forth using a replacement for the aft hook area 130, the techniques disclosed herein can be employed to replace other heat-damaged areas of the diaphragm 120, as needed.
Some refurbishers have repaired the eroded rail surface by machining the eroded surface to remove the eroded and corroded portions, welding on additional Ni-Resist material, and remachining the diaphragm 120 to the original equipment manufacturer's dimensional specifications. Such a technique is difficult to perform, because the casting porosity and heavy oxidation of the Ni-Resist material makes it difficult to weld. Furthermore, the conventional welding refurbishment technique does not permanently solve the problem, and the diaphragm is subject to the same erosion and oxidation, because the repair does not solve the problem of the excessive temperature. Thus, the repaired diaphragm may develop the same erosion and oxidation as before, requiring redoing the repair procedure.
Others have replaced the entire diaphragm section 120 with a replacement diaphragm section manufactured from a higher temperature material, such as a stainless steel. While the replacement diaphragm made of stainless steel is capable of withstanding higher temperatures than the Ni-Resist material, the cost of replacing the diaphragm with a new diaphragm made of stainless steel is undesirably high, because of the higher materials and manufacturing costs for the stainless steel diaphragm, as well as the waste of the original diaphragm, which in most part is not subject to the higher temperatures, and does not suffer the erosion and oxidation as a result, and does not need the higher-temperature material.
As disclosed herein, embodiments of the present invention avoid the high costs of a complete replacement and the lack of durability and difficulty of an original material Ni-Resist material repair. A portion 210 of the aft hook section 130 of the diaphragm 120 (indicated in
A replacement rail insert section 400 is machined, typically from a solid block of a stainless steel material. Most of the rail insert section 400 is machined or milled to match the configuration of the section 210 of the diaphragm 120 that was eroded and removed as described above. But a tab section 410 is machined to match the T-slot 310 in the diaphragm 120 illustrated in
In some embodiments, the rail insert 400 is machined roughly the same width as but slightly wider than the diaphragm section 120, then further machined in place after assembly to better match the diaphragm section 120, providing a smooth interface where the tab 410 engages the slot 310. A retainer screw 510 can be used at either end or both ends of the tab-slot interface to hold the rail insert section 400 in place, preventing motion relative to the diaphragm 120.
As illustrated in top view in
If necessary or desired, other openings can be formed or machined in the rail insert 400 for allowing placement of sensors or other conventional elements as used in the original diaphragm section 120 before refurbishment. Where seals, such as the seal 230 of
The rail insert 400 is preferably manufactured from a block of material. The material used is selected for its ability to sustain high temperatures and with a similar coefficient of expansion as the Ni-Resist material used in the diaphragm 120. In one embodiment, the rail insert 400 is manufactured from a stainless steel, such as a type 310 stainless steel. The resulting refurbished nozzle segment and diaphragm is then reassembled with other such segments into the turbine nozzle. Depending on the damage observed or discovered when the turbine nozzle was disassembled for refurbishment, any number of the diaphragm segments 120 can be refurbished as described above, providing a refurbished gas turbine nozzle at a lower cost and with less wasted materials than a complete replacement with higher temperature material, but providing improved durability over a conventional repair procedure that replaces eroded material with the original material.
While certain exemplary embodiments have been described in details and shown in the accompanying drawings, it is to be understood that such embodiments are merely illustrative of and not devised without departing from the basic scope thereof, which is determined by the claims that follow.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3300180 | Tuttle et al. | Jan 1967 | A |
4832252 | Fraser | May 1989 | A |
4889470 | Scalzo | Dec 1989 | A |
4924581 | Jakobsen | May 1990 | A |
5060842 | Qureshi et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5062205 | Fraser | Nov 1991 | A |
5259727 | Quinn | Nov 1993 | A |
5269057 | Mendham | Dec 1993 | A |
5697151 | Werner et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
6394750 | Hiskes | May 2002 | B1 |
6568077 | Hellemann et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6892931 | Steplewski et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
7008170 | Proveaux et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7179052 | Sasaki et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7484928 | Arness et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7556475 | Roberts, III et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7722314 | Burdgick | May 2010 | B2 |
7762783 | Cairo et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
20050172485 | Mussen | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20070280820 | Roberts et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080289179 | Pellet et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090229101 | Ahmad et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100290902 A1 | Nov 2010 | US |