Generally described, computing devices and communication networks can be utilized to exchange information. In a common application, a computing device can request content from another computing device via the communication network. For example, a user at a personal computing device can utilize a software browser application to request a Web page from a server computing device via the Internet. In such embodiments, the user computing device can be referred to as a client computing device and the server computing device can be referred to as a content provider.
Content providers are generally motivated to provide requested content to client computing devices often with consideration of efficient transmission of the requested content to the client computing device and/or consideration of a cost associated with the transmission of the content. For larger scale implementations, a content provider may receive content requests from a high volume of client computing devices which can place a strain on the content provider's computing resources. Additionally, the content requested by the client computing devices may have a number of components, which can further place additional strain on the content provider's computing resources.
With reference to an illustrative example, a requested Web page, or original content, may be associated with a number of additional resources, such as images or videos, which are to be displayed with the Web page. In one specific embodiment, the additional resources of the Web page are identified by a number of embedded resource identifiers, such as uniform resource locators (“URLs”). In turn, software on the client computing devices typically processes embedded resource identifiers to generate requests for the content. Often, the resource identifiers associated with the embedded resources reference a computing device associated with the content provider such that the client computing device would transmit the request for the additional resources to the referenced content provider computing device. Accordingly, in order to satisfy a content request, the content provider(s) (or any service provider on behalf of the content provider(s)) would provide client computing devices data associated with the Web page and/or the data associated with the embedded resources.
Content providers are generally motivated to provide requested content to client computing devices often with consideration of efficient transmission of the requested content to the client computing device and/or consideration of a cost associated with the transmission of the content. Accordingly, content providers often consider factors such as latency of delivery of requested content in processing client computing device requests in order to meet service level agreements or to generally improve the quality of delivery service.
The foregoing aspects and many of the attendant advantages of this invention will become more readily appreciated as the same become better understood by reference to the following detailed description, when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
Generally described, the present disclosure is directed to managing request routing functionality associated with resource requests for one or more resources associated with a content provider. Specifically, aspects of the disclosure will be described with regard to the management and processing of request routing functionality by a service provider, such as a content delivery network (“CDN”) service provider, on behalf of a content provider. Illustratively, the request routing functionality can correspond to the processing of domain name service (“DNS”) requests for resources by computing devices and the resolution of the DNS requests by the identification of a network address of a computing device that will provide the requested resources. Unlike traditional CDN service provider implementation, the processing of DNS requests by the service provider can be separated from the storage of content by the content provider or on behalf of the content provider. Additionally, the processing of the DNS requests by the service provider can also be separated from the delivery of the content by the content provider or on behalf of the content provider.
Although various aspects of the disclosure will be described with regard to illustrative examples and embodiments, one skilled in the art will appreciate that the disclosed embodiments and examples should not be construed as limiting. For example, the present disclosure may be described with regard to request routing services provided by a service provider, such as a CDN service provider, that may provide additional services and functionality including network-based storage services, caching services, and content delivery services. However, one skilled in the relevant art will appreciate that a service provider need not provide all, or any, of the additional services or functionality that may be associated with some service providers, such as a CDN service provider.
Although not illustrated in
The content delivery environment 100 can also include a content provider 104 in communication with the one or more client computing devices 102 via the communication network 108. The content provider 104 illustrated in
As further illustrated in
With continued reference to
In an illustrative embodiment, the DNS component 122, 128, 134 and resource cache component 124, 130, 136 are considered to be logically grouped, regardless of whether the components, or portions of the components, are physically separate. Additionally, although the POPs 120, 126, 132 are illustrated in
With further continued reference to
In an illustrative embodiment, the storage components 140, 144 are considered to be logically grouped, regardless of whether the components, or portions of the components, are physically separate. Additionally, although the NSP POPs 138, 142 are illustrated in
Even further, one skilled in the relevant art will appreciate that the components of the network storage provider 110 and components of the service provider 106 can be managed by the same or different entities. One skilled in the relevant art will also appreciate that the components and configurations provided in
With reference now to
With reference to
One skilled in the relevant art will appreciate that upon storage of the content by the network storage provider 110, the content provider 104 can begin to direct requests for content from client computing devices 102 to the network storage provider 110. Specifically, in accordance with DNS routing principles, a client computing device request corresponding to a resource identifier would eventually be directed toward a storage component 140, 144 of a NSP POP 138, 142 associated with the network storage provider 110. The request routing of a client computing device request will be described in greater detail below.
With continued reference to
In one embodiment, the network storage provider 110 returns an identification of applicable domains for the network storage provider (unless it has been previously provided) and any additional information to the content provider 104. In turn, the content provider 104 can then process the stored content with content provider specific information. In one example, as illustrated in
Generally, the identification of the resources originally directed to the content provider 104 will be in the form of a resource identifier that can be processed by the client computing device 102, such as through a browser software application. In an illustrative embodiment, the resource identifiers can be in the form of a uniform resource locator (“URL”). Because the resource identifiers are included in the requested content directed to the content provider, the resource identifiers can be referred to generally as the “content provider URL.” For purposes of an illustrative example, the content provider URL can identify a domain of the content provider 104 (e.g., contentprovider.com), a name of the resource to be requested (e.g., “resource.xxx”) and a path where the resource will be found (e.g., “path”). In this illustrative example, the content provider URL has the form of:
http://www.contentprovider.com/path/resource.xxx
In an alternative embodiment, the resource identifiers provided by the content provider 104 can correspond to the network storage provider 110, or network storage providers, that are hosting content on behalf of the content provider. These resource identifiers can be generally referred to as network storage provider URLs. The network storage provider URLs identify a domain of the network storage provider 110 (e.g., “storageprovider.com”), the same name of the resource to be requested (e.g., “resource.xxx”) and the same path where the resource will be found (e.g., “path”). Additionally, the network storage provider URL can include additional processing information (e.g., “additional information”) such as request routing information or identification information, such as a content provider identifier. Illustratively, the network storage provider URL would have the form of:
http://additional information.storageprovider.com/path/resource.xxx
In another embodiment, the information associated with the network storage provider 110 is included in the network storage provider URL, such as through prepending or other techniques, such that the network storage provider URL can maintain all of the information associated with the original URL. In this embodiment, the network storage provider URL would have the form of:
http://additional information.storageprovider.com/www.contentprovider.com/path/resource.xxx
With reference now to
The service provider 106 obtains the registration API and processes the information. In one aspect, the service provider 106 can generate the necessary request processing rules or alternative identifiers that may be utilized in the resolution of client computing device DNS queries. In another aspect, the service provider 106 can cause the registration of its DNS name server components for the relevant domains specified by the content provider 104. The service provider 104 can then send a response to the content provider 104, such as a confirmation.
Illustratively, upon the optional identification of appropriate storage component 140, 144 of the network storage provider 110 and the registration for request routing functionality with the service provider 106, the content provider 104 can, in one embodiment as will be further described below in reference to
With reference first to
With reference now to
In an illustrative embodiment, the identification of a DNS server authoritative to the “contentprovider” corresponds to an IP address of a DNS server associated with the service provider 106. In one embodiment, the IP address is a specific network address unique to DNS server component(s) of a specific POP associated with the service provider 106. In another embodiment, the IP address can be shared by one or more POPs associated with the service provider 106, which may be geographically or logically distributed. In this embodiment, a DNS query to the shared IP address utilizes a one-to-many network routing schema, such as anycast, such that a specific POP will receive the request as a function of network topology. For example, in an anycast implementation, a DNS query issued by a client computing device 102 to a shared IP address will arrive at a DNS server component of the service provider 106 logically having the shortest network topology distance, often referred to as network hops, from the client computing device. The network topology distance does not necessarily correspond to geographic distance. However, in some embodiments, the network topology distance can be inferred to be the shortest network distance between a client computing device 102 and a service provider POP.
With continued reference to
In an illustrative embodiment, the service provider 106 will utilize cost information, at least in part, to resolve a DNS request and identify an IP address of one or more storage components that will process (or can process) the request for the requested resource (e.g., resolve the client computing device DNS query). The resolution of a DNS query as a function of cost information may depend on the cost information maintained by the service provider 106 or cost information transmitted as part of the DNS query (e.g., cost information included in the URL). In one example, the cost information may designate that the content provider 104 has requested that the service provider 106 select the storage component that will process the request for the requested resource associated with the lowest current cost to the content provider 104 to provide the requested resource. Accordingly, the service provider 106 could obtain cost information from the content provider 104 and utilize the cost information in resolving the DNS query. In another example, the service provider 106 can utilize cost information associated with an attributed cost to the service provider to deliver the requested resource if an associated component of the service provider is also providing the requested resource on behalf of the content provider 104.
In another embodiment, the service provider 106 can attempt to resolve the DNS query according to geographic criteria. The geographic criteria can correspond to geographic-based regional service plans contracted between the service provider 106 and the content provider 104 or a storage component and the content provider 104. Accordingly, a client computing device 102 DNS query received in a region not corresponding to the content provider's regional plan may be better processed by a storage component in a region corresponding to the content provider's regional plan. In this example, the DNS server component 118 may also obtain geographic information from the client computing device 102 directly (such as information provided by the client computing device or ISP) or indirectly (such as inferred through a client computing device's IP address).
In a further embodiment, the service provider 106 can attempt resolve the DNS query according to service level criteria. The service level criteria can correspond to service or performance metrics contracted between the service provider 106 and the content provider 104 or between a storage component and the content provider 104. Examples of performance metrics can include thresholds for latencies of data transmission associated with transmissions to the client computing devices 102, total data provided on behalf of the content provider 104, error rates for data transmissions, and the like.
In still a further embodiment, the service provider 106 can attempt to resolve the DNS query according to network performance criteria. The network performance criteria can correspond to measurements of network performance for transmitting data from the service provider 106 to the client computing device 102 or storage components to the client computing devices. Examples of network performance metrics can include network data transfer latencies measured by the client computing device 102 or the service provider 106, network data error rates, and the like.
As an alternative to selecting a storage component (e.g., resolving the DNS query), the service provider 106 can maintain sets of various alternative resource identifiers. The alternative resource identifiers can be provided by the service provider 106 to the client computing device 102 such that a subsequent DNS query on the alternative resource identifier will resolve to a different DNS server component within the service provider's network. In such an embodiment, the receiving DNS name server may utilize alternative resource identifiers in the form of one or more canonical name (“CNAME”) records to provide additional request routing information. In one embodiment, each CNAME record identifies a domain of the service provider (e.g., “serviceprovider.com” or “serviceprovider-1.com”). As will be explained in greater detail below, the domain in the CNAME does not need to be the same domain found in the original URL or network storage provider URL. Still further, the domain in the CNAME may be unique to the content provider or a common domain utilized by the service provider on behalf of a number of content providers. Additionally, each CNAME record includes additional information, such as request routing information, (e.g., “request routing information”). An illustrative CNAME record can have the form of:
CNAME request_routing_information.serviceprovider.com
In a manner similar to the information described above, in an illustrative embodiment, each CNAME record includes additional information utilized by a receiving DNS name server for processing the DNS query. In an illustrative embodiment, the additional information can include information or criteria utilized by the service provider 106 during the request routing process. The additional information included in the CNAME can be the same cost information provided in the original URL or network storage provider URL or additional/alternative costs information obtained by the service provider 106 and previously provided by the content provider 104. Illustratively, the additional information can include cost information, service level information, network performance information, client identifiers, content provider identifiers, or other identifiers used to look up request additional request routing information. An illustrative CNAME record can have the form of:
CNAME request_routing_information.cost_information.cdnprovider.com
In an illustrative embodiment, the CNAME records are generated and provided by the DNS servers to direct a more appropriate DNS server of the service provider 106. As used in accordance with the present disclosure, appropriateness can be defined in any manner by the service provider 106 for a variety of purposes. In an illustrative embodiment, the service provider 106 will utilize the additional information, at least in part, to identify the more appropriate DNS server of the service provider 106.
In one illustrative example, the additional information may designate the content provider 104 has requested that the cost associated with the providing the requested resource be maintained below one or more cost thresholds or cost tiers. Accordingly, the service provider 106 could obtain cost information for at least a portion of the POPs and select one or more DNS servers associated with a cost at or below the cost thresholds. The service provider 106 could then utilize other request routing criteria to select from the selected DNS server (if more than one DNS server is identified) or selected in accordance with other selections methodologies (e.g., random, round robin, etc.).
In another illustrative example, the service provider 106 can attempt to direct a DNS query to DNS servers according to geographic criteria. The geographic criteria can correspond to geographic-based regional service plans contracted between the service provider 106 and the content provider 104 in which various service provider 106 POPs are grouped into geographic regions. Accordingly, a client computing device 102 DNS query received in a region not corresponding to the content provider's regional plan may be better processed by a DNS server in a region corresponding to the content provider's regional plan. In this example, the DNS server may also obtain geographic information from the client directly (such as information provided by the client computing device or ISP) or indirectly (such as inferred through a client computing device's IP address).
In a further illustrative example, the service provider 106 can attempt to direct a DNS query to DNS servers according to service level criteria. The service level criteria can correspond to service or performance metrics contracted between the service provider 106 and the content provider 104. Examples of performance metrics can include latencies of data transmission between the service provider POPs 120, 126, 132 and the client computing devices 102, total data provided on behalf of the content provider 104 by the service provider POPs, error rates for data transmissions, and the like.
In still a further example, the service provider 106 can attempt to direct a DNS query to DNS servers according to network performance criteria. The network performance criteria can correspond to measurements of network performance for transmitting data from the service provider POPs 120, 126, 132 to the client computing device 102. Examples of network performance metrics can include network data transfer latencies measured by the client computing device or the service provider 106, network data error rates, and the like.
In accordance with an illustrative embodiment, the DNS server maintains a data store that defines CNAME records for various URLs. If a DNS query corresponding to a particular URL matches an entry in the data store, the DNS server returns a CNAME record as defined in the data store. In an illustrative embodiment, the data store can include multiple CNAME records corresponding to a particular original URL. The multiple CNAME records would define a set of potential candidates that can be returned to the client computing device. In such an embodiment, the DNS server, either directly or via a network-based service, can implement additional logic in selecting an appropriate CNAME from a set of possible of CNAMEs. In an illustrative embodiment, each DNS server component 122, 128, 134 maintains the same data stores that define CNAME records, which can be managed centrally by the service provider 106. Alternatively, each DNS server component 122, 128, 134 can have a POP specific data stores that define CNAME records, which can be managed centrally by the service provider 106 or locally at the POP 120, 126, 132.
With reference now to
With reference now to
At block 502, the service provider 106 obtains a request for providing DNS request routing services on behalf of a content provider 104. Illustratively, the request for providing DNS request routing services may be facilitated through a registration API in which the content provider specifies information necessary for the service provider 106 to begin hosting DNS name server functionality on behalf of the content provider. The transmission of the registration API (and associated information) may be an automatic process corresponding to an exchange of information between computing devices without need for administrator, or other human interaction. Alternatively, the transmission of the registration API (and associated information) may be an automatic, a manual, or a semi-manual process in which an administrator specifies at least a portion of the information necessary for the service provider 106 to begin hosting DNS name server functionality on behalf of the content provider. An illustrative screen display for the manual specification of at least a portion of the information necessary for the service provider 106 to begin hosting DNS name server functionality on behalf of the content provider will be described with regard to
At block 504, the service provider 106 obtains the identification of the content provider domains and the storage components, cost information, request routing information or other information that will be utilized by the service provider in processing and resolving the DNS queries. Illustratively, the service provider 106 can obtain at least a portion of the information from the registration API. Additionally, the service provider 106 can request additional information from the content provider 104 or other third parties, such as network storage provider 110. At block 506, the service provider 106 generates request routing rules and information utilized in resolving DNS queries or providing CNAMES. For example, the service provider 106 may generate, update, or modify a table of CNAMES in accordance with the registration information. At block 508, the service provider 106 registers its DNS name servers with the appropriate entities such that the service provider 106 can begin receiving DNS queries directed toward the specified content provider domains. The registration of IP addresses for DNS name server components is well known and will not be described in greater detail. At block 510, the routine 500 terminates.
With reference now to
At block 602, the service provider 106 obtains a DNS query corresponding to resource identifier, such as at a “receiving DNS server.” In an embodiment, one of the DNS servers associated with the service provider 106 may directly receive the DNS query transmitted by a client computing device 102 or on behalf of a client computing device 102. Alternatively, the service provider may receive information associated with a DNS query via an API transmitted by a computing device receiving the DNS query transmitted by a client computing device 102 or on behalf of a client computing device 102.
As previously discussed, the resource identifier can be a URL that has been embedded in content requested by the client computing device 102 and previously provided by the content provider 104. Alternatively, the resource identifier can also correspond to a CNAME provided by a content provider DNS server in response to a DNS query previously received from the client computing device 102. At block 604, the receiving DNS server obtains content provider additional request routing information. As described above, in an illustrative embodiment, the additional request routing information may be maintained by the service provider 106 or included, at least in part, in the URL or CNAME. Such additional request routing information may specify that the service provider 106 should utilize additional request routing information in attempting to resolve the DNS query. As previously discussed, the additional request routing information can include cost information, service level information, geographic information, network performance information, and the like. The additional request routing information may be in the form of one or more thresholds (maximum, intermediate or minimum), ranges, averages, logic statements, declarative criteria, and the like.
At decision block 606, a test is conducted to determine whether the current DNS server is authoritative to resolve the DNS query. In one illustrative embodiment, the DNS server can determine whether it is authoritative to resolve the DNS query if there are no CNAME records corresponding to the received resource identifier. For example, the receiving DNS server may maintain one or more CNAMEs that define various cost alternatives for request routing processing. In this embodiment, the receiving DNS server can utilize the additional request routing information obtained in block 604 to select the appropriate CNAME. Alternatively, the receiving DNS server may select a CNAME without requiring additional information from the URL or CNAME. In one example, the additional request routing information may designate that the content provider 104 has requested that the service provider 106 select the DNS server of the service provider 106 associated with the lowest current cost to provide the requested resource. Accordingly, the service provider 106 could obtain additional request routing information for at least a portion of the POPs and select a CNAME corresponding to a DNS server associated with the lowest cost.
In another example, the additional request routing information may designate the content provider 104 has requested that the cost associated with the providing the requested resource be maintained below one or more cost thresholds or cost tiers so long as a maximum average latency threshold is maintained. Accordingly, the service provider 106 could obtain cost information and latency information associated for at least a portion of the POPs and select a CNAME corresponding to a DNS server associated with a cost satisfying the specified cost threshold. Alternative or additional methodologies may also be practiced to determine whether the DNS server is authoritative.
If the current DNS server is authoritative (including a determination that the same DNS server will be authoritative for subsequent DNS queries), the current DNS server resolves the DNS query by returning the IP address of a cache server component at block 608. In a non-limiting manner, a number of methodologies for selecting an appropriate resource cache component have been previously discussed. Additionally, the service provider 106 can obtain real time or semi-real time information regarding that status of the various available storage components, such as a current load, availability, resource utilization, health information, and the like. Still further, as described above, the IP address may correspond to a specific cache server of a resource cache component or generally to group of cache servers. The identification of the IP address may be provided to the client computing device 102 responsive to the received DNS query. Alternatively, if the DNS query was received as an API, the identification of the IP address may be provided via an API.
Alternatively, if at decision block 606, the DNS server is not authoritative, at block 610, the DNS server component selects and transmits an alternative resource identifier. As described above, the DNS server component can utilize a data store to identify an appropriate CNAME as a function of the current DNS query. Additionally, the DNS server component can also implement additional logical processing to select from a set of potential CNAMES. Illustratively, the identification of the selected CNAMES may be provided to the client computing device 102 responsive to the received DNS query. Alternatively, if the DNS query was received as an API, the identification of the CNAME may be provided via an API. At block 612, different DNS server components 122, 128, 134 receive a DNS query corresponding to the CNAME. The routine 600 then returns to decision block 606 and continues to repeat as appropriate.
With reference now to
The screen display 700 includes a first portion identifying the embedded resources, such as an embedded resource the storage components will provide, such as name 702, an embedded resource type 704, and a size of the embedded resource 706. The identifying information may be manually entered, or automatically filled in by the service provider 106 or network storage provider 110. The screen display 700 includes a second portion for identifying the location of the storage components that will provided the resources, such a components 708 and 710. The second portion can also include various cost information, such as cost codes, or other request routing information that specifies criteria utilized by the service provider 106 to select among storage components.
With continued reference to
It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art and others that all of the functions described in this disclosure may be embodied in software executed by one or more processors of the disclosed components and mobile communication devices. The software may be persistently stored in any type of non-volatile storage.
Conditional language, such as, among others, “can,” “could,” “might,” or “may,” unless specifically stated otherwise, or otherwise understood within the context as used, is generally intended to convey that certain embodiments include, while other embodiments do not include, certain features, elements and/or steps. Thus, such conditional language is not generally intended to imply that features, elements and/or steps are in any way required for one or more embodiments or that one or more embodiments necessarily include logic for deciding, with or without user input or prompting, whether these features, elements and/or steps are included or are to be performed in any particular embodiment.
Any process descriptions, elements, or blocks in the flow diagrams described herein and/or depicted in the attached figures should be understood as potentially representing modules, segments, or portions of code which include one or more executable instructions for implementing specific logical functions or steps in the process. Alternate implementations are included within the scope of the embodiments described herein in which elements or functions may be deleted, executed out of order from that shown or discussed, including substantially concurrently or in reverse order, depending on the functionality involved, as would be understood by those skilled in the art. It will further be appreciated that the data and/or components described above may be stored on a computer-readable medium and loaded into memory of the computing device using a drive mechanism associated with a computer-readable medium storing the computer executable components such as a CD-ROM, DVD-ROM, or network interface further, the component and/or data can be included in a single device or distributed in any manner. Accordingly, general purpose computing devices may be configured to implement the processes, algorithms, and methodology of the present disclosure with the processing and/or execution of the various data and/or components described above.
It should be emphasized that many variations and modifications may be made to the above-described embodiments, the elements of which are to be understood as being among other acceptable examples. All such modifications and variations are intended to be included herein within the scope of this disclosure and protected by the following claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/892,877, entitled “REQUEST ROUTING IN A NETWORKED ENVIRONMENT,” and filed on Sep. 28, 2010, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5341477 | Pitkin et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5611049 | Pitts | Mar 1997 | A |
5701467 | Freeston | Dec 1997 | A |
5774660 | Brendel et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5852717 | Bhide et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5892914 | Pitts | Apr 1999 | A |
5893116 | Simmonds et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5933811 | Angles et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5974454 | Apfel et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6016512 | Huitema | Jan 2000 | A |
6026452 | Pitts | Feb 2000 | A |
6052718 | Gifford | Apr 2000 | A |
6078960 | Ballard | Jun 2000 | A |
6085234 | Pitts et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6098096 | Tsirigotis et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6108703 | Leighton et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6157942 | Chu et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6167438 | Yates et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6167446 | Lister et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6182111 | Inohara et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6182125 | Borella et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6185598 | Farber et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6192051 | Lipman et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6205475 | Pitts | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6223288 | Byrne | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6243761 | Mogul et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6275496 | Burns et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6286043 | Cuomo et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6286084 | Wexler et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6304913 | Rune | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6345308 | Abe | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6351743 | DeArdo et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6351775 | Yu | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6363411 | Dugan et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6366952 | Pitts | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6374290 | Scharber et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6377257 | Borrel et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6386043 | Millins | May 2002 | B1 |
6405252 | Gupta et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6411967 | Van Renesse | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6415280 | Farber et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6430607 | Kavner | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6438592 | Killian | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6452925 | Sistanizadeh et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6457047 | Chandra et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6459909 | Bilcliff et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6473804 | Kaiser et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6505241 | Pitts | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6523036 | Hickman et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6529910 | Fleskes | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6529953 | Van Renesse | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6553413 | Leighton et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6560610 | Eatherton et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6611873 | Kanehara | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6643357 | Lumsden | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6654807 | Farber et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6658462 | Dutta | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6665706 | Kenner et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6678791 | Jacobs et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6681282 | Golden et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6694358 | Swildens et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6697805 | Choquier et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6724770 | Van Renesse | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6732237 | Jacobs et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6754699 | Swildens et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6754706 | Swildens et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6760721 | Chasen et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6769031 | Bero | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6782398 | Bahl | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6785704 | McCanne | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6795434 | Kumar et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6799214 | Li | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6804706 | Pitts | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6810291 | Card et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6810411 | Coughlin et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6829654 | Jungck | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6862607 | Vermeulen | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6874017 | Inoue et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6917951 | Orbits et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6928467 | Peng et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6928485 | Krishnamurthy et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6941562 | Gao et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6963850 | Bezos et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6976090 | Ben-Shaul et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6981017 | Kasriel et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6985945 | Farhat et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6986018 | O'Rourke et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6990526 | Zhu | Jan 2006 | B1 |
6996616 | Leighton et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7003555 | Jungck | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7006099 | Gut et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7007089 | Freedman | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7010578 | Lewin et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7010598 | Sitaraman et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7024466 | Outten et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7031445 | Lumsden | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7032010 | Swildens et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7058706 | Iyer et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7058953 | Willard et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7065587 | Huitema et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7072982 | Teodosiu et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7076633 | Tormasov et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7082476 | Cohen et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7086061 | Joshi et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7092505 | Allison et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7092997 | Kasriel et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7096266 | Lewin et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7099936 | Chase et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7103645 | Leighton et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7114160 | Suryanarayana et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7117262 | Bai et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7133905 | Dilley et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7136922 | Sundaram et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7139821 | Shah et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7143169 | Champagne et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7143170 | Swildens et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7146560 | Dang et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7149809 | Barde et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7152118 | Anderson, IV et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7162539 | Garcie-Luna-Aceves | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7174382 | Ramanathan et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7185063 | Kasriel et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7185084 | Sirivara et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7188214 | Kasriel et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7194522 | Swildens et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7200667 | Teodosiu et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7216170 | Ludvig et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7225254 | Swildens et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
7228350 | Hong et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7228359 | Monteiro | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7233978 | Overton et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7240100 | Wein et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7251675 | Kamakura et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7254626 | Kommula et al. | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7254636 | O'Toole, Jr. et al. | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7257581 | Steele et al. | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7260598 | Liskov et al. | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7260639 | Afergan et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7269784 | Kasriel et al. | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7274658 | Bornstein et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7289519 | Liskov | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7293093 | Leighton | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7308499 | Chavez | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7310686 | Uysal | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7316648 | Kelly et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7320131 | O'Toole, Jr. | Jan 2008 | B1 |
7321918 | Burd et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7339937 | Mitra et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7363291 | Page | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7363626 | Koutharapu et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7370089 | Boyd et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7373416 | Kagan et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7376736 | Sundaram et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7380078 | Ikegaya et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7392236 | Rusch et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7398301 | Hennessey et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7406512 | Swildens et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7406522 | Riddle | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7430610 | Pace et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7441045 | Skene et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7454457 | Lowery et al. | Nov 2008 | B1 |
7454500 | Hsu et al. | Nov 2008 | B1 |
7461170 | Taylor et al. | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7464142 | Flurry et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7478148 | Neerdaels | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7492720 | Pruthi et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7496651 | Joshi | Feb 2009 | B1 |
7499998 | Toebes et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7502836 | Menditto et al. | Mar 2009 | B1 |
7519720 | Fishman et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7519726 | Palliyil et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7523181 | Swildens et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7543024 | Holstege | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7548947 | Kasriel et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7552235 | Chase et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7555542 | Ayers et al. | Jun 2009 | B1 |
7561571 | Lovett et al. | Jul 2009 | B1 |
7565407 | Hayball | Jul 2009 | B1 |
7568032 | Feng et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7573916 | Bechtolsheim et al. | Aug 2009 | B1 |
7574499 | Swildens et al. | Aug 2009 | B1 |
7581009 | Hsu et al. | Aug 2009 | B1 |
7594189 | Walker et al. | Sep 2009 | B1 |
7596619 | Leighton et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7617222 | Coulthard et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7623460 | Miyazaki | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7624169 | Lisiecki et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7631101 | Sullivan et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7640296 | Fuchs et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7650376 | Blumenau | Jan 2010 | B1 |
7653700 | Bahl et al. | Jan 2010 | B1 |
7653725 | Yahiro et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7657613 | Hanson et al. | Feb 2010 | B1 |
7657622 | Douglis et al. | Feb 2010 | B1 |
7661027 | Langen et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7664879 | Chan et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7676570 | Levy et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7680897 | Carter et al. | Mar 2010 | B1 |
7685251 | Houlihan et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7693813 | Cao et al. | Apr 2010 | B1 |
7702724 | Brydon et al. | Apr 2010 | B1 |
7706740 | Collins et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7707314 | McCarthy et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7711647 | Gunaseelan et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7711788 | Lev Ran et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7716367 | Leighton et al. | May 2010 | B1 |
7725602 | Liu et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7730187 | Raciborski et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7739400 | Lindbo et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7747720 | Toebes et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7756913 | Day | Jul 2010 | B1 |
7756965 | Joshi | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7757202 | Dahlstedt et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7761572 | Auerbach | Jul 2010 | B1 |
7765304 | Davis et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7769823 | Jenny et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7773596 | Marques | Aug 2010 | B1 |
7774342 | Virdy | Aug 2010 | B1 |
7787380 | Aggarwal et al. | Aug 2010 | B1 |
7792989 | Toebes et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7809597 | Das et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7813308 | Reddy et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7814229 | Cabrera et al. | Oct 2010 | B1 |
7818454 | Kim et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7827256 | Phillips et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7836177 | Kasriel et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7873065 | Mukerji et al. | Jan 2011 | B1 |
7890612 | Todd et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7899899 | Joshi | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7904875 | Hegyi | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7912921 | O'Rourke et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7925782 | Sivasubramanian et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7930393 | Baumback et al. | Apr 2011 | B1 |
7930402 | Swildens et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7930427 | Josefsberg et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7933988 | Nasuto et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7937477 | Day et al. | May 2011 | B1 |
7945693 | Farber et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7949779 | Farber et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7958222 | Pruitt et al. | Jun 2011 | B1 |
7958258 | Yeung et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7962597 | Richardson et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7966404 | Hedin et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7970816 | Chess et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7970940 | van de Ven et al. | Jun 2011 | B1 |
7979509 | Malmskog et al. | Jul 2011 | B1 |
7991910 | Richardson et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
7996533 | Leighton et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
7996535 | Auerbach | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8000724 | Rayburn et al. | Aug 2011 | B1 |
8010707 | Elzur et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8024441 | Kommula et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8028090 | Richardson et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8041773 | Abu-Ghazaleh et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8041809 | Sundaram et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8041818 | Gupta et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8065275 | Eriksen et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8069231 | Schran et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8073940 | Richardson et al. | Dec 2011 | B1 |
8082348 | Averbuj et al. | Dec 2011 | B1 |
8108623 | Krishnaprasad et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8117306 | Baumback et al. | Feb 2012 | B1 |
8122098 | Richardson et al. | Feb 2012 | B1 |
8122124 | Baumback et al. | Feb 2012 | B1 |
8135820 | Richardson et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8156243 | Richardson et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8190682 | Paterson-Jones et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8195837 | McCarthy et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8224986 | Liskov et al. | Jul 2012 | B1 |
8234403 | Richardson et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8239530 | Sundaram et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8250211 | Swildens et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8250219 | Raciborski et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8266288 | Banerjee et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8266327 | Kumar et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8280998 | Joshi | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8281035 | Farber et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8291046 | Farber et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8291117 | Eggleston et al. | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8301645 | Crook | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8321568 | Sivasubramanian et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8402137 | Sivasubramanian et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8433749 | Wee et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8447876 | Verma et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8452874 | MacCarthaigh et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8463877 | Richardson | Jun 2013 | B1 |
8468222 | Sakata et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8468245 | Farber et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8473613 | Farber et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8478903 | Farber et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8504721 | Hsu et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8510428 | Joshi | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8510807 | Elazary et al. | Aug 2013 | B1 |
8521851 | Richardson et al. | Aug 2013 | B1 |
8521908 | Holmes et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8526405 | Curtis et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8527658 | Holmes et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8572208 | Farber et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8572210 | Farber et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8577992 | Richardson et al. | Nov 2013 | B1 |
8589996 | Ma et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8606996 | Richardson et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8615549 | Knowles et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8626950 | Richardson et al. | Jan 2014 | B1 |
8639817 | Sivasubramanian et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8645539 | McCarthy et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8676918 | Richardson et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8683076 | Farber et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8688837 | Richardson et al. | Apr 2014 | B1 |
8732309 | Richardson et al. | May 2014 | B1 |
8756325 | Sivasubramanian et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8756341 | Richardson et al. | Jun 2014 | B1 |
8782236 | Marshall et al. | Jul 2014 | B1 |
8782279 | Eggleston et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8819283 | Richardson et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8924528 | Richardson et al. | Dec 2014 | B1 |
8930513 | Richardson et al. | Jan 2015 | B1 |
8930544 | Richardson et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8938526 | Richardson et al. | Jan 2015 | B1 |
9003035 | Richardson et al. | Apr 2015 | B1 |
9009286 | Sivasubramanian et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9021127 | Richardson et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9021128 | Sivasubramanian et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9021129 | Richardson et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9026616 | Sivasubramanian et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
20010000811 | May et al. | May 2001 | A1 |
20010025305 | Yoshiasa | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010032133 | Moran | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010034704 | Farhat et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010049741 | Skene et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010052016 | Skene et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010056416 | Garcia-Luna-Aceves | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010056500 | Farber et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020002613 | Freeman et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020004846 | Garcia-Luna-Aceves et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020007413 | Garcia-Luna-Aceves et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020010798 | Ben-Shaul et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020048269 | Hong et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020049608 | Hartsell et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020049857 | Farber et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020052942 | Swildens et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020062372 | Hong et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020068554 | Dusse | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020069420 | Russell et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020078233 | Biliris et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020082858 | Heddaya et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020083118 | Sim | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020083148 | Shaw et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020087374 | Boubez et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020091786 | Yamaguchi et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020092026 | Janniello et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020099616 | Sweldens | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020099850 | Farber et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020101836 | Dorenbosch | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020107944 | Bai et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020112049 | Elnozahy et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020116481 | Lee | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020116491 | Boyd et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020120782 | Dillon et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020124047 | Gartner et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020124098 | Shaw | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020129123 | Johnson et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020135611 | Deosaran et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020138286 | Engstrom | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020138437 | Lewin et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020143989 | Huitema et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020147770 | Tang | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020147774 | Lisiecki et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020150094 | Cheng et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020156911 | Croman et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020161767 | Shapiro et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020163882 | Bornstein et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020165912 | Wenocur et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020169890 | Beaumont et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020188722 | Banerjee et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020198953 | O'Rourke et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030002484 | Freedman | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030009591 | Hayball et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030026410 | Lumsden | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030028642 | Agarwal et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030033283 | Evans et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030037139 | Shteyn | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030065739 | Shnier | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030074401 | Connell et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030079027 | Slocombe et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030093523 | Cranor et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030099202 | Lear et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030099237 | Mitra et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030101278 | Garcia-Luna-Aceves et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030120741 | Wu et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030133554 | Nykanen et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030135509 | Davis et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030140087 | Lincoln et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030145038 | Tariq et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030145066 | Okada et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030149581 | Chaudhri et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030154239 | Davis et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030154284 | Bernardin et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030163722 | Anderson, IV | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030172145 | Nguyen | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030172183 | Anderson, IV et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030172291 | Judge et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030174648 | Wang et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030182305 | Balva et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030182413 | Allen et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030182447 | Schilling | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030187935 | Agarwalla et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030187970 | Chase et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030191822 | Leighton et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030200394 | Ashmore et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030204602 | Hudson et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030229682 | Day | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030233423 | Dilley et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030233445 | Levy et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030233455 | Leber et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030236700 | Arning et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040010563 | Forte et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040010621 | Afergan et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040019518 | Abraham et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040024841 | Becker et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040030620 | Benjamin et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040034744 | Karlsson et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040039798 | Hotz et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040044731 | Chen et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040044791 | Pouzzner | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040059805 | Dinker et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040064501 | Jan et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040073596 | Kloninger et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040073707 | Dillon | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040073867 | Kausik et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040078468 | Hedin et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040078487 | Cernohous et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040083283 | Sundaram et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040083307 | Uysal | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040117455 | Kaminsky et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040128344 | Trossen | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040128346 | Melamed et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040167981 | Douglas et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040167982 | Cohen et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040172466 | Douglas et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040194085 | Beaubien et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040194102 | Neerdaels | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040203630 | Wang | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040205149 | Dillon et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040205162 | Parikh | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040215823 | Kleinfelter et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040221019 | Swildens et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040221034 | Kausik et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040249939 | Amini et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040249971 | Klinker | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040249975 | Tuck et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040254921 | Cohen et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040267906 | Truty | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040267907 | Gustafsson | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050010653 | McCanne | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050021706 | Maggi et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050021862 | Schroeder et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050027882 | Sullivan et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050038967 | Umbehocker et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050044270 | Grove et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050102683 | Branson et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050108169 | Balasubramanian et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050108529 | Juneau | May 2005 | A1 |
20050114296 | Farber et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050117717 | Lumsden | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050132083 | Raciborski et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050157712 | Rangarajan et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050163168 | Sheth et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050168782 | Kobashi et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050171959 | Deforche et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050188073 | Nakamichi et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050192008 | Desai et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050198334 | Farber et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050198571 | Kramer et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050216569 | Coppola et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050216674 | Robbin et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050229119 | Torvinen | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050232165 | Brawn et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050259672 | Eduri | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050262248 | Jennings, III et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050267991 | Huitema et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050267992 | Huitema et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050267993 | Huitema et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050278259 | Gunaseelan et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050283759 | Peteanu et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050283784 | Suzuki | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060013158 | Ahuja et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060020596 | Liu et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060020684 | Mukherjee et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060020714 | Girouard et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060020715 | Jungck | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060026067 | Nicholas et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060026154 | Altinel et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060036720 | Faulk, Jr. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060036966 | Yevdayev | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060037037 | Miranz | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060039352 | Karstens | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060041614 | Oe | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060047787 | Agarwal et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060047813 | Aggarwal et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060059246 | Grove | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060063534 | Kokkonen et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060064476 | Decasper et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060064500 | Roth et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060074750 | Clark et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060075084 | Lyon | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060075139 | Jungck | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060083165 | McLane et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060085536 | Meyer et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060088026 | Mazur et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060112066 | Hamzy | May 2006 | A1 |
20060112176 | Liu et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060120385 | Atchison et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060129665 | Toebes et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060143293 | Freedman | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060149529 | Nguyen et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060155823 | Tran et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060155862 | Kathi et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060161541 | Cencini | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060168088 | Leighton et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060179080 | Meek et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060184936 | Abels et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060190605 | Franz et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060193247 | Naseh et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195866 | Thukral | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060206568 | Verma et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060206586 | Ling et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060218265 | Farber et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060218304 | Mukherjee et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060227740 | McLaughlin et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060227758 | Rana et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060230137 | Gare et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060233155 | Srivastava | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060253546 | Chang et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060253609 | Andreev et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060259581 | Piersol | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060259690 | Vittal et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060259984 | Juneau | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060265497 | Ohata et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060265508 | Angel et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060265516 | Schilling | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060265720 | Cai et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060271641 | Stavrakos et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060282522 | Lewin et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060288119 | Kim et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070005689 | Leighton et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070005801 | Kumar et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070005892 | Mullender et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070011267 | Overton et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070014241 | Banerjee et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070021998 | Laithwaite et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070028001 | Phillips et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070038729 | Sullivan et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070038994 | Davis et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070041393 | Westhead et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070043859 | Ruul | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070050522 | Grove et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070050703 | Lebel | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070055764 | Dilley et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070061440 | Sundaram et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070076872 | Juneau | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070086429 | Lawrence et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070094361 | Hoynowski et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070101377 | Six et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070118667 | McCarthy et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070118668 | McCarthy et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070134641 | Lieu | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070156919 | Potti et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070162331 | Sullivan | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070168517 | Weller | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070174426 | Swildens et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070174442 | Sherman et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070174490 | Choi et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070183342 | Wong et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070198982 | Bolan et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070204107 | Greenfield et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070208737 | Li et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070219795 | Park et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070220010 | Ertugrul | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070233705 | Farber et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070233706 | Farber et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070233846 | Farber et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070233884 | Farber et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070244964 | Challenger et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070250467 | Mesnik et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070250560 | Wein et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070250601 | Amlekar et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070250611 | Bhogal et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070253377 | Janneteau et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070255843 | Zubev | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070263604 | Tai | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070266113 | Koopmans et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070266311 | Westphal | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070266333 | Cossey et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070270165 | Poosala | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070271375 | Hwang | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070271385 | Davis et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070280229 | Kenney | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070288588 | Wein et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070291739 | Sullivan et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080005057 | Ozzie et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080008089 | Bornstein et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080025304 | Venkataswami et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080037536 | Padmanabhan et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080046550 | Mazur et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080046596 | Afergan et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080065724 | Seed et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080065745 | Leighton et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080071859 | Seed et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080071987 | Karn et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080072264 | Crayford | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080082551 | Farber et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080086574 | Raciborski et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080103805 | Shear et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080104268 | Farber et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080114829 | Button et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080126706 | Newport et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080134043 | Georgis et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080140800 | Farber et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080147866 | Stolorz et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080147873 | Matsumoto | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080155061 | Afergan et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080155614 | Cooper et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080162667 | Verma et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080162821 | Duran et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080162843 | Davis et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080172488 | Jawahar et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080189437 | Halley | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080201332 | Souders et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080215718 | Stolorz et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080215730 | Sundaram et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080215735 | Farber et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080215747 | Menon et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080215750 | Farber et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080215755 | Farber et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080222281 | Dilley et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080222291 | Weller et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080222295 | Robinson et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080228574 | Stewart et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080228920 | Souders et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080235400 | Slocombe et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080256175 | Lee et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080275772 | Suryanarayana et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080281946 | Swildens et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080281950 | Wald et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080288722 | Lecoq et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080301670 | Gouge et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080319862 | Golan et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080320123 | Houlihan et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080320269 | Houlihan et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090013063 | Soman | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090016236 | Alcala et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090029644 | Sue et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090031367 | Sue | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090031368 | Ling | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090031376 | Riley et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090049098 | Pickelsimer et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090063038 | Shrivathsan et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090063704 | Taylor et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090070533 | Elazary et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090083228 | Shatz et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090086741 | Zhang | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090089869 | Varghese | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090103707 | McGary et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090106381 | Kasriel et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090112703 | Brown | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090125393 | Hwang et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090125934 | Jones et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090132368 | Cotter et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090132648 | Swildens et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090144412 | Ferguson et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090150926 | Schlack | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090157850 | Gagliardi et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090158163 | Stephens et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090164331 | Bishop et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090177667 | Ramos et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090182815 | Czechowsk et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090182837 | Rogers | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090182945 | Aviles et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090187575 | DaCosta | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090204682 | Jeyaseelan et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090210549 | Hudson et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090233623 | Johnson | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090248786 | Richardson et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090248787 | Sivasubramanian et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090248852 | Fuhrmann et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090248858 | Sivasubramanian et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090248893 | Richardson et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090249222 | Schmidt et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090254661 | Fullagar et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090259971 | Rankine et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090271498 | Cable | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090271577 | Campana et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090271730 | Rose et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090279444 | Ravindran et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090282038 | Subotin et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090287750 | Banavar et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090307307 | Igarashi | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090327489 | Swildens et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090327517 | Sivasubramanian et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090327914 | Adar et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100005175 | Swildens et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100011061 | Hudson et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100011126 | Hsu et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100023601 | Lewin et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100030662 | Klein | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100030914 | Sparks et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100034470 | Valencia-Campo et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100036944 | Douglis et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100042725 | Jeon et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100057894 | Glasser | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100070603 | Moss et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100082787 | Kommula et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100088367 | Brown et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100088405 | Huang et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100100629 | Raciborski et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100111059 | Bappu et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100115133 | Joshi | May 2010 | A1 |
20100115342 | Shigeta et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100121953 | Friedman et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100121981 | Drako | May 2010 | A1 |
20100122069 | Gonion | May 2010 | A1 |
20100125673 | Richardson et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100125675 | Richardson et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100131646 | Drako | May 2010 | A1 |
20100138559 | Sullivan et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100150155 | Napierala | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100161799 | Maloo | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100169392 | Lev Ran et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100169452 | Atluri et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100192225 | Ma et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100217801 | Leighton et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100223364 | Wei | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100226372 | Watanabe | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100228819 | Wei | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100257024 | Holmes et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100257266 | Holmes et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100257566 | Matila | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100268789 | Yoo et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100274765 | Murphy et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100293296 | Hsu et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100293479 | Rousso et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100299427 | Joshi | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100299438 | Zimmerman et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100299439 | McCarthy et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100312861 | Kolhi et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100318508 | Brawer et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100322255 | Hao et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100332595 | Fullagar et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110029598 | Arnold et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110040893 | Karaoguz et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110078000 | Ma et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110078230 | Sepulveda | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110087769 | Holmes et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110096987 | Morales et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110113467 | Agarwal et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110153938 | Verzunov et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110153941 | Spatscheck et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110191449 | Swildens et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110191459 | Joshi | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110208876 | Richardson et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110219120 | Farber et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110219372 | Agrawal et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110238501 | Almeida | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110238793 | Bedare et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110252142 | Richardson et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110252143 | Baumback et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110258049 | Ramer et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110276623 | Girbal | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110296053 | Medved et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110302304 | Baumback et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110320559 | Foti | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120036238 | Sundaram et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120066360 | Ghosh | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120089972 | Scheidel et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120096065 | Suit et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120124184 | Sakata et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120131177 | Brandt et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120136697 | Peles et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120166516 | Simmons et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120169646 | Berkes et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120173760 | Jog et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120179817 | Bade et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120179839 | Raciborski et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120198043 | Hesketh et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120233522 | Barton et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120233668 | Leafe et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120303804 | Sundaram et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120311648 | Swildens et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120324089 | Joshi | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130003735 | Chao et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130019311 | Swildens et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130041872 | Aizman et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130086001 | Bhogal et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130130221 | Kortemeyer et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130151646 | Chidambaram et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130198341 | Kim | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130212300 | Eggleston et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130227165 | Liu | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130246567 | Green et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130268616 | Sakata et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130311605 | Richardson et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130318153 | Sivasubramanian et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130339429 | Richardson et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130346567 | Richardson et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140040478 | Hsu et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140075109 | Richardson et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140143320 | Sivasubramanian et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140257891 | Richardson et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140297870 | Eggleston et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140325155 | Marshall et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150081842 | Richardson et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150172379 | Richardson et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150172407 | MacCarthaigh et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150172414 | Richardson et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150172415 | Richardson et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1422468 | Jun 2003 | CN |
1605182 | Apr 2005 | CN |
101189598 | May 2008 | CN |
101460907 | Jun 2009 | CN |
103731481 | Apr 2014 | CN |
1603307 | Dec 2005 | EP |
1351141 | Oct 2007 | EP |
2008167 | Dec 2008 | EP |
2001-0506093 | May 2001 | JP |
2001-249907 | Sep 2001 | JP |
2002-044137 | Feb 2002 | JP |
2003-167810 | Jun 2003 | JP |
2003-167813 | Jun 2003 | JP |
2003-522358 | Jul 2003 | JP |
2003188901 | Jul 2003 | JP |
2004-533738 | Nov 2004 | JP |
2005-537687 | Dec 2005 | JP |
2007-133896 | May 2007 | JP |
2009-071538 | Apr 2009 | JP |
2012-209623 | Oct 2012 | JP |
WO 02069608 | Sep 2002 | WO |
WO 2005071560 | Aug 2005 | WO |
WO 2007007960 | Jan 2007 | WO |
WO 2007126837 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO 2010002603 | Jan 2010 | WO |
WO 2012044587 | Apr 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“Global Server Load Balancing with ServerIron,” Foundry Networks, retrieved Aug. 30, 2007, from http://www.foundrynet.com/pdf/an-global-server-load-bal.pdf, 7 pages. |
“Grid Computing Solutions,” Sun Microsystems, Inc., retrieved May 3, 2006, from http://www.sun.com/software/grid, 3 pages. |
“Grid Offerings,” Java.net, retrieved May 3, 2006, from http://wiki.java.net/bin/view/Sungrid/OtherGridOfferings, 8 pages. |
“Recent Advances Boost System Virtualization,” eWeek.com, retrieved from May 3, 2006, http://www.eWeek.com/article2/0,1895,1772626,00.asp, 5 pages. |
“Scaleable Trust of Next Generation Management (STRONGMAN),” retrieved May 17, 2006, from http://www.cis.upenn.edu/˜dsl/STRONGMAN/, 4 pages. |
“Sun EDA Compute Ranch,” Sun Microsystems, Inc., retrieved May 3, 2006, from http://sun.com/processors/ranch/brochure.pdf, 2 pages. |
“Sun Microsystems Accelerates UltraSP ARC Processor Design Program With New Burlington, Mass. Compute Ranch,” Nov. 6, 2002, Sun Microsystems, Inc., retrieved May 3, 2006, from http://www.sun.com/smi/Press/sunflash/2002-11/sunflash.20021106.3 .xml, 2 pages. |
“Sun N1 Grid Engine 6,” Sun Microsystems, Inc., retrieved May 3, 2006, from http://www.sun.com/software/gridware/index.xml, 3 pages. |
“Sun Opens New Processor Design Compute Ranch,” Nov. 30, 2001, Sun Microsystems, Inc., retrieved May 3, 2006, from http://www.sun.com/smi/Press/sunflash/2001-11/sunflash.20011130.1.xml, 3 pages. |
“The Softricity Desktop,” Softricity, Inc., retrieved May 3, 2006, from http://www.softricity.com/products/, 3 pages. |
“Xen—The Xen virtual Machine Monitor,” University of Cambridge Computer Laboratory, retrieved Nov. 8, 2005, from http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/Research/SRG/netos/xen/, 2 pages. |
“XenFaq,” retrieved Nov. 8, 2005, from http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XenFaq?action=print, 9 pages. |
Abi, Issam, et al., “A Business Driven Management Framework for Utility Computing Environments,” Oct. 12, 2004, HP Laboratories Bristol, HPL-2004-171, retrieved Aug. 30, 2007, from http://www.hpl.hp.com/techreports/2004/HPL-2004-171.pdf, 14 pages. |
Bellovin, S., “Distributed Firewalls,” ;login;:37-39, Nov. 1999, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/-smb/papers/distfw. html, 10 pages, retrieved Nov. 11, 2005. |
Blaze, M., “Using the KeyNote Trust Management System,” Mar. 1, 2001, from http://www.crypto.com/trustmgt/kn.html, 4 pages, retrieved May 17, 2006. |
Byun et al., “A Dynamic Grid Services Deployment Mechanism for On-Demand Resource Provisioning”, IEEE International Symposium on Cluster Computing and the Grid:863-870, 2005. |
Clark, C., “Live Migration of Virtual Machines,” May 2005, NSDI '05: 2nd Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation, Boston, MA, May 2-4, 2005, retrieved from http://www.usenix.org/events/nsdi05/tech/full—papers/clark/clark.pdf, 14 pages. |
Coulson, D., “Network Security Iptables,” Apr. 2003, Linuxpro, Part 2, retrieved from http://davidcoulson.net/writing/lxf/38/iptables.pdf, 4 pages. |
Coulson, D., “Network Security Iptables,” Mar. 2003, Linuxpro, Part 1, retrieved from http://davidcoulson.net/writing/lxf/39/iptables.pdf, 4 pages. |
Deleuze, C., et al., A DNS Based Mapping Peering System for Peering CDNs, draft-deleuze-cdnp-dnsmap-peer-00.txt, Nov. 20, 2000, 20 pages. |
Demers, A., “Epidemic Algorithms for Replicated Database Maintenance,” 1987, Proceedings of the sixth annual ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, Aug. 10-12, 1987, 12 pages. |
Gruener, J., “A Vision of Togetherness,” May 24, 2004, NetworkWorld, retrieved May 3, 2006, from, http://www.networkworld.com/supp/2004/ndc3/0524virt.html, 9 pages. |
Gunther et al, “Measuring Round Trip Times to determine the Distance between WLAN Nodes”, Dec. 18, 2004, Technical University Berlin, all pages. |
Ioannidis, S., et al., “Implementing a Distributed Firewall,” Nov. 2000, (ACM) Proceedings of the ACM Computer and Communications Security (CCS) 2000, Athens, Greece, pp. 190-199, retrieved from http://www.cis.upenn.edu/˜dls/STRONGMAN/Papers/df.pdf, 10 pages. |
Joseph, Joshy, et al., “Introduction to Grid Computing,” Apr. 16, 2004, retrieved Aug. 30, 2007, from http://www.informit.com/articles/printerfriendly.aspx?p=169508, 19 pages. |
Kenshi, P., “Help File Library: Iptables Basics,” Justlinux, retrieved Dec. 1, 2005, from http://www.justlinux.com/nhf/Security/Iptables—Basics.html, 4 pages. |
Shankland, S., “Sun to buy start-up to bolster N1 ,” Jul. 30, 2003, CNet News.com, retrieved May 3, 2006, http://news.zdnet.com/2100-3513—22-5057752.html, 8 pages. |
Strand, L., “Adaptive distributed firewall using intrusion detection,” Nov. 1, 2004, University of Oslo Department of Informatics, retrieved Mar. 8, 2006, from http://gnist.org/˜lars/studies/master/StrandLars-master.pdf, 158 pages. |
Van Renesse, R., “Astrolabe: A Robust and Scalable Technology for Distributed System Monitoring, Management, and Data Mining,” May 2003, ACM Transactions on Computer Systems (TOCS), 21 (2): 164-206, 43 pages. |
Vijayan, J., “Terraspring Gives Sun's N1 a Boost,” Nov. 25, 2002, Computerworld, retrieved May 3, 2006, from http://www.computerworld.com/printthis/2002/0,4814,76159,00.html, 3 pages. |
Virtual Iron Software Home, Virtual Iron, retrieved May 3, 2006, from http://www.virtualiron.com/, 1 page. |
Waldspurger, CA., “Spawn: A Distributed Computational Economy,” Feb. 1992, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 18(2): 103-117,15 pages. |
Zhu, Xiaoyun, et al., “Utility-Driven Workload Management Using Nested Control Design,” Mar. 29, 2006, HP Laboratories Palo Alto, HPL-2005-193(R.1), retrieved Aug. 30, 2007, from http://www.hpl.hp.com/techreports/2005/HPL-2005-193R1.pdf, 9 pages. |
First Singapore Written Opinion in Application No. 201006836-9, dated Oct. 12, 2011 in 12 pages. |
Singapore Written Opinion in Application No. 201006836-9, dated Apr. 30, 2012 in 10 pages. |
First Office Action in Chinese Application No. 200980111422.3 dated Apr. 13, 2012. |
First Office Action in Japanese Application No. 2011-502138 dated Feb. 1, 2013. |
Singapore Written Opinion in Application No. 201006837-7, mailed Oct. 12, 2011 in 11 pages. |
Supplementary European Search Report in Application No. 09727694.3 mailed Jan. 30, 2012 in 6 pages. |
Singapore Examination Report in Application No. 201006837-7 mailed Mar. 16, 2012. |
First Office Action in Chinese Application No. 200980111426.1 mailed Feb. 16, 2013. |
Second Office Action in Chinese Application No. 200980111426.1 mailed Dec. 25, 2013. |
Third Office Action in Chinese Application No. 200980111426.1 mailed Jul. 7, 2014. |
First Office Action in Japanese Application No. 2011-502139 dated Nov. 5, 2013. |
Decision of Rejection in Application No. 2011-502139 dated Jun. 30, 2014. |
Singapore Written Opinion in Application No. 201006874-0, mailed Oct. 12, 2011 in 10 pages. |
First Office Action in Japanese Application No. 2011-502140 mailed Dec. 7, 2012. |
First Office Action in Chinese Application No. 200980119995.0 dated Jul. 6, 2012. |
Second Office Action in Chinese Application No. 200980119995.0 dated Apr. 15, 2013. |
Examination Report in Singapore Application No. 201006874-0 dated May 16, 2012. |
Supplementary European Search Report in Application No. 09728756.9 mailed Jan. 8, 2013. |
First Office Action in Chinese Application No. 200980119993.1 dated Jul. 4, 2012. |
Second Office Action in Chinese Application No. 200980119993.1 dated Mar. 12, 2013. |
Third Office Action in Chinese Application No. 200980119993.1 dated Oct. 21, 2013. |
First Office Action in Japanese Application No. 2011-503091 dated Nov. 18, 2013. |
Search Report and Written Opinion issued in Singapore Application No. 201006873-2 mailed on Oct. 12, 2011. |
Second Office Action in Japanese Application No. 2011-516466 mailed Mar. 17, 2014. |
Preliminary Examination in Chinese Application No. 201310717573.1 dated Feb. 25, 2014. English Translation Not Yet Received. |
Examination Report in Singapore Application No. 201103333-9 dated Aug. 13, 2013. |
First Office Action in Japanese Application No. 2013-529454 mailed Feb. 3, 2014 in 6 pages. |
First Office Action issued in Australian Application No. 2011307319 mailed Mar. 6, 2014 in 5 pages. |
Search Report and Written Opinion in Singapore Application No. 201301573-0 mailed Jul. 1, 2014. |
Office Action in Japanese Application No. 2013-540982 dated Jun. 2, 2014 English Translation Not Yet Received. |
Written Opinion in Singapore Application No. 201303521-7 dated May 20, 2014. |
Office Action in Japanese Application No. 2013-123086 mailed Apr. 15, 2014 in 3 pages. |
American Bar Association; Digital Signature Guidelines Tutorial [online]; Feb. 10, 2002 [retrieved on Mar. 2, 2010]; American Bar Association Section of Science and Technology Information Security Committee; Retrieved from the internet: (URL: http://web.archive.org/web/20020210124615/www.abanet.org/scitech/ec/isc/dsg-tutorial.html; pp. 1-8. |
Baglioni et al., “Preprocessing and Mining Web Log Data for Web Personalization”, LNAI 2829, 2003, pp. 237-249. |
Barbir, A., et al., “Known Content Network (CN) Request-Routing Mechanisms”, Request for Comments 3568, [online], IETF, Jul. 2003, [retrieved on Feb. 26, 2013], Retrieved from the Internet: (URL: http://tools.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3568.txt). |
Liu et al., “Combined mining of Web server logs and web contents for classifying user navigation patterns and predicting users' future requests,” Data & Knowledge Engineering 61 (2007) pp. 304-330. |
Tan et al., “Classification: Basic Concepts, Decision Tree, and Model Evaluation”, Introduction in Data Mining; http://www-users.cs.umn.edu/˜kumar/dmbook/ch4.pdf, 2005, pp. 245-205. |
Xu et al., “Decision tree regression for soft classification of remote sensing data”, Remote Sensing of Environment 97 (2005) pp. 322-336. |
First Office Action is Chinese Application No. 200980125551.8 mailed Jul. 4, 2012. |
First Office Action in Japanese Application No. 2011-516466 mailed Mar. 6, 2013. |
Office Action in Canadian Application No. 2726915 dated May 13, 2013. |
First Office Action in Korean Application No. 10-2011-7002461 mailed May 29, 2013. |
First Office Action in Chinese Application No. 200980145872.4 dated Nov. 29, 2012. |
Office Action in Canadian Application No. 2741895 dated Feb. 25, 2013. |
Office Action in Canadian Application No. 2741895 dated Oct. 21, 2013. |
Search Report and Written Opinion in Singapore Application No. 201103333-9 mailed Nov. 19, 2012. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2011/053302 mailed Nov. 28, 2011 in 11 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability in PCT/US2011/053302 mailed Apr. 2, 2013. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability in PCT/US2011/061486 mailed May 22, 2013. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2011/061486 mailed Mar. 30, 2012 in 11 pages. |
Preliminary Examination in Chinese Application No. 201180053405.6 dated May 28, 2013. English Translation Not Yet Received. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US07/07601 mailed Jul. 18, 2008 in 11 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability in PCT/US2007/007601 mailed Sep. 30, 2008 in 8 pages. |
Supplementary European Search Report in Application No. 07754164.7 mailed Dec. 20, 2010 in 7 pages. |
Office Action in Chinese Application No. 200780020255.2 dated Mar. 4, 2013. |
Office Action in Indian Application No. 3742/KOLNP/2008 dated Nov. 22, 2013. |
Office Action in Japanese Application No. 2012-052264 mailed Dec. 11, 2012 in 26 pages. |
Canonical Name (CNAME) DNS Records, domainavenue.com, Feb. 1, 2001, XP055153783, Retrieved from the Internet: URL:http://www.domainavenue.com/cname.htm [retrieved on Nov. 18, 2014]. |
“Content delivery network”, Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, Retrieved from the Internet: URL:http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Contentdelivery network&oldid=6010099 70, XP055153445, Mar. 24, 2008. |
Brenton, C., “What is Egress Filtering and How Can I Implement It?—Egress Filtering v 0.2,” Feb. 29, 2000, SANS Institute, http://www.sans.org/infosecFAQ/firewall/egress.htm, 6 pages. |
Chipara et al, “Realtime Power-Aware Routing in Sensor Network”, IEEE, 2006, 10 pages. |
Maesono, et al., “A Local Scheduling Method considering Data Transfer in Data Grid,” Technical Report of IEICE, vol. 104, No. 692, pp. 435-440, The Institute of Electronics, Information and Communication Engineers, Japan, Feb. 2005. |
Takizawa, et al., “Scalable MultiReplication Framework on the Grid,” Report of Study of Information Processing Society of Japan, Information Processing Society, vol. 2004, No. 81, pp. 247-252, Japan, Aug. 1, 2004. |
Watanabe, et al., “Remote Program Shipping System for GridRPC Systems,” Report of Study of Information Processing Society of Japan, Information Processing Society, vol. 2003, No. 102, pp. 73-78, Japan, Oct. 16, 2003. |
Yamagata, et al., “A virtual-machine based fast deployment tool for Grid execution environment,” Report of Study of Information Processing Society of Japan, Information Processing Society, vol. 2006, No. 20, pp. 127-132, Japan, Feb. 28, 2006. |
First Office Action in Chinese Application No. 201180046104.0 mailed Nov. 3, 2014. |
“Non-Final Office Action dated Jan. 3, 2012,” U.S. Appl. No. 12/652,541, filed Jan. 3, 2012; 35 pages. |
“Final Office Action dated Sep. 5, 2012,” U.S. Appl. No. 12/652,541, filed Sep. 5, 2012; 40 pages. |
“Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 4, 2013,” U.S. Appl. No. 12/652,541, filed Jan. 4, 2013; 11 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action dated Apr. 30, 2014,” U.S. Appl. No. 13/842,970, filed 20 pages. |
“Final Office Action dated Aug. 19, 2014,” U.S. Appl. No. 13/842,970, filed 13 pages. |
“Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 5, 2014,” U.S. Appl. No. 13/842,970, filed 6 pages. |
Gunther et al, “Measuring Round Trip Times to determine the Distance between WLAN Nodes”,May 2005, In Proc. of Networking 2005, all pages. |
Hartung et al.; Digital rights management and watermarking of multimedia content for m-commerce applications; Published in: Communications Magazine, IEEE (vol. 38, Issue: 11 ); Date of Publication: Nov. 2000; pp. 78-84; IEEE Xplore. |
Kalafut et al., Understanding Implications of DNS Zone Provisioning., Proceeding IMC '08 Proceedings of the 8th AMC SIGCOMM conference on Internet measurement., pp. 211-216., ACM New York, NY, USA., 2008. |
Kato, Yoshinobu , Server load balancer—Difference in distribution technique and supported protocol—Focus on function to meet the needs, Nikkei Communications, Japan, Nikkei Business Publications, Inc., Mar. 20, 2000, vol. 314, pp. 114 to 123. |
Mulligan et al.; How DRM-based content delivery systems disrupt expectations of “personal use”; Published in: Proceeding DRM '03 Proceedings of the 3rd ACM workshop on Digital rights management; 2003; pp. 77-89; ACM Digital Library. |
Supplementary European Search Report in Application No. 09729072.0 2266064 dated Dec. 10, 2014. |
Fourth Office Action in Chinese Application No. 200980111426.1 mailed Jan. 15, 2015. |
Search Report for European Application No. 09839809.2 dated May 11, 2015. |
Decision of Refusal in Japanese Application No. 2011-516466 mailed Jan. 16, 2015. |
Office Action in Japanese Application No. 2013-529454 mailed Mar. 9, 2015 in 8 pages. |
Examination Report in Singapore Application No. 201301573-0 mailed Dec. 22, 2014. |
First Office Action in Chinese Application No. 201180053405.6 dated May 3, 2015. |
Office Action in Japanese Application No. 2013-123086 mailed Dec. 2, 2014 in 2 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140365666 A1 | Dec 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12892877 | Sep 2010 | US |
Child | 14467774 | US |