Generally described, computing devices and communication networks can be utilized to exchange information. In a common application, a computing device can request content from another computing device via the communication network. For example, a user at a personal computing device can utilize a software browser application to request a Web page from a server computing device via the Internet. In such embodiments, the user computing device can be referred to as a client computing device and the server computing device can be referred to as a content provider.
Content providers are generally motivated to provide requested content to client computing devices often with consideration of efficient transmission of the requested content to the client computing device and/or consideration of a cost associated with the transmission of the content. For larger scale implementations, a content provider may receive content requests from a high volume of client computing devices which can place a strain on the content provider's computing resources. Additionally, the content requested by the client computing devices may have a number of components, which can further place additional strain on the content provider's computing resources.
With reference to an illustrative example, a requested Web page, or original content, may be associated with a number of additional resources, such as images or videos, which are to be displayed with the Web page. In one specific embodiment, the additional resources of the Web page are identified by a number of embedded resource identifiers, such as uniform resource locators (“URLs”). In turn, software on the client computing devices typically processes embedded resource identifiers to generate requests for the content. Often, the resource identifiers associated with the embedded resources reference a computing device associated with the content provider such that the client computing device would transmit the request for the additional resources to the referenced content provider computing device. Accordingly, in order to satisfy a content request, the content provider would provide client computing devices data associated with the Web page as well as the data associated with the embedded resources.
Some content providers attempt to facilitate the delivery of requested content, such as Web pages and/or resources identified in Web pages, through the utilization of a content delivery network (“CDN”) service provider. A CDN server provider typically maintains a number of computing devices in a communication network that can maintain content from various content providers. In turn, content providers can instruct, or otherwise suggest to, client computing devices to request some, or all, of the content provider's content from the CDN service provider's computing devices.
As with content providers, CDN service providers are also generally motivated to provide requested content to client computing devices often with consideration of efficient transmission of the requested content to the client computing device and/or consideration of a cost associated with the transmission of the content. Accordingly, CDN service providers often consider factors such as latency of delivery of requested content in order to meet service level agreements or to generally improve the quality of delivery service.
The foregoing aspects and many of the attendant advantages of this invention will become more readily appreciated as the same become better understood by reference to the following detailed description, when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
Generally described, the present disclosure is directed to routing of DNS queries from a client computing device corresponding to content requests by a network resource, such as content delivery network (“CDN”) service providers. The processing of a DNS query by a CDN service provider is generally referred to as request routing. Specifically, aspects of the disclosure will be described with regard to the routing of a client computing device DNS query within a content delivery network service provider domain as a function of client location information associated with the processing of the content request from the client computing device. In one embodiment, a CDN service provider utilizes query IP address to location-based identifier mappings to select components of a CDN network to provide the requested resource. The CDN network component can be selected by identifying a client computing device's location and attempting to improve performance associated with the request routing by transmitting requested resources from a CDN network component in a destination associated with the client's location. Although various aspects of the disclosure will be described with regard to illustrative examples and embodiments, one skilled in the art will appreciate that the disclosed embodiments and examples should not be construed as limiting.
Although not illustrated in
The content delivery environment 100 can also include a content provider 104 in communication with the one or more client computing devices 102 via the communication network 108. The content provider 104 illustrated in
With continued reference to
Still further, the CDN service provider 106 includes a routing data store 134 for maintaining information regarding query IP address to location-based identifier mappings, as well as confidence factors associated with those mappings, such as disclosed in U.S. application Ser. No. 11/771,679, which is herein incorporated by reference. In some embodiments, the location-based identifiers can correspond to locations directly determined based on physical locations or logical locations associated with the origin of the DNS query. In addition or alternatively, the location-based identifier can be inferred based on associating a relative location to known locations. For example, the location-based identifier can be attributed to known locations of POPs (corresponding to the CDN service provider) based on measured latency information associated with request routing between the client computing device or its local DNS resolver and these POPs. The measured latency information can be premeasured, such as through testing procedures or previously observed request routing behavior. Alternatively, the measured latency information can be dynamically measured in a real time basis or semi-real time basis.
The routing data store 134 can also maintain additional location mapping information such as mappings of the location-based identifiers to regional CDN destination identifiers. Even further, the location mapping data store 134 can include information identifying a set of POPs associated with each CDN destination identifier. Yet further, the routing data store 134 can include user profile information from which alternative user location information may be obtained. Yet still further, the routing data store 134 can include content provider routing criteria associated with a content provider identifier (or origin identifier), such as regional service plan information or other routing criteria, utilized by the CDN service provider 106 to route content requests.
In an illustrative embodiment, the routing data store 134 corresponds to a central data store accessible by the POPs 116, 122, 128, such as via a Web service. In another embodiment, each POP 116, 122, 128 can maintain a local version of a routing data store 134 for utilization in request routing as will be explained in greater detail. Additionally, although the routing data store 134 is illustrated as a single data store, one skilled in the relevant art will appreciate that routing data store 134 may correspond to one or more data stores and may be implemented in a distributed manner.
The DNS components 118, 124 and 130 and the resource cache components 120, 126, 132 may further include additional software and/or hardware components that facilitate communications including, but not limited to, load balancing or load sharing software/hardware components.
In an illustrative embodiment, the DNS component 118, 124, 130 and resource cache component 120, 126, 132 are considered to be logically grouped, regardless of whether the components, or portions of the components, are physically separate. Additionally, although the POPs 116, 122, 128 are illustrated in
One skilled in the relevant art will appreciate that the components and configurations provided in
With reference now to
With reference to
In another embodiment, the routing criteria can include a selection by the content provider 104 that the CDN service provider 106 should attempt to service specific resource requests from a particular regional destination or POP or from a particular distribution of regional destinations or POPs.
One skilled in the relevant art will appreciate that upon identification of appropriate origin servers 112, the content provider 104 can begin to direct requests for content from client computing devices 102 to the CDN service provider 106. Specifically, in accordance with DNS routing principles, a client computing device request corresponding to a resource identifier would eventually be directed toward a POP 116, 122, 128 associated with the CDN service provider 106. In the event that the resource cache component 120, 126, 132 of a selected POP does not have a copy of a resource requested by a client computing device 102, the resource cache component will request the resource from the origin server 112 previously registered by the content provider 104.
With continued reference to
The CDN service provider 106 returns an identification of applicable domains for the CDN service provider (unless it has been previously provided) and any additional information to the content provider 104. In turn, the content provider 104 can then process the stored content with content provider specific information. In one example, as illustrated in
Generally, the identification of the resources originally directed to the content provider 104 will be in the form of a resource identifier that can be processed by the client computing device 102, such as through a browser software application. In an illustrative embodiment, the resource identifiers can be in the form of a uniform resource locator (“URL”). Because the resource identifiers are included in the requested content directed to the content provider, the resource identifiers can be referred to generally as the “content provider URL.” For purposes of an illustrative example, the content provider URL can identify a domain of the content provider 104 (e.g., contentprovider.com), a name of the resource to be requested (e.g., “resource.xxx”) and a path where the resource will be found (e.g., “path”). In this illustrative example, the content provider URL has the form of:
During an illustrative translation process, the content provider URL is modified such that requests for the resources associated with the translated URLs resolve to a POP associated with the CDN service provider 106. In one embodiment, the translated URL identifies the domain of the CDN service provider 106 (e.g., “cdnprovider.com”), the same name of the resource to be requested (e.g., “resource.xxx”) and the same path where the resource will be found (e.g., “path”). Additionally, the translated URL can include additional processing information (e.g., “additional information”). Specifically, as set forth above, in one illustrative embodiment, the additional information can include a content provider identifier. Additionally, the translated URL can include any additional information utilized by the CDN service provider during the request routing information, including, but not limited to, service plan information, file identifiers, and the like. Such information may be included in the modified URL or may be omitted from the translated URL and obtained by the CDN service provider 106 during the request routing process, such as by a lookup according to a content provider identifier. The translated URL would have the form of:
In another embodiment, the information associated with the CDN service provider 106 is included in the modified URL, such as through prepending or other techniques, such that the translated URL can maintain all of the information associated with the original URL. In this embodiment, the translated URL would have the form of:
With reference now to
Upon receipt of the requested content, the client computing device 102, such as through a browser software application, begins processing any of the markup code included in the content and attempts to acquire the resources identified by the embedded resource identifiers. Accordingly, the first step in acquiring the content corresponds to the issuance, by the client computing device 102 (through its local DNS resolver), of a DNS query for the original URL resource identifier that results in the identification of a DNS server authoritative to the “.” and the “com” portions of the translated URL. After processing the “.” and “com” portions of the embedded URL, the client computing device 102 then issues a DNS query for the resource URL that results in the identification of a DNS server authoritative to the “.cdnprovider” portion of the embedded URL. The issuance of DNS queries corresponding to the “.” and the “com” portions of a URL are well known and have not been illustrated.
With reference now to
With continued reference to
Returning to
In an illustrative embodiment, the CNAME records are generated and provided by the DNS servers to identify a more appropriate DNS server of the CDN service provider 106. As used in accordance with the present disclosure, appropriateness can be defined in any manner by the CDN service provider 106 for a variety of purposes. In an illustrative embodiment, as will be described in greater detail below in reference to
As described above, in addition to the consideration of client location information (either of the end-client or its associated local DNS resolver component), the CDN service provider 106 can utilize the additional information (e.g., the “additional information”) included in the translated URL to select a more appropriate DNS server. In one aspect, the CDN service provider 106 can utilize the additional information to select from a set of DNS servers identified as satisfying criteria associated with the client location information. In another aspect, the CDN service provider 106 can utilize the additional information to validate the DNS server selected in accordance with the client location information or to select an alternative DNS server previously selected in accordance with the client location information. In one example, the CDN service provider 106 can attempt to direct a DNS query to DNS servers according to additional geographic criteria. The additional geographic criteria can correspond to geographic-based regional service plans contracted between the CDN service-provider 106 and the content provider 104 in which various CDN service provider 106 POPs are grouped into geographic regions. Accordingly, a client computing device 102 DNS query received in a region not corresponding to the content provider's regional plan may be better processed by a DNS server in region corresponding to the content provider's regional plan.
In another example, the CDN service provider 106 can attempt to direct a DNS query to DNS servers according to service level criteria. The service level criteria can correspond to service or performance metrics contracted between the CDN service provider 106 and the content provider 104. Examples of performance metrics can include latencies of data transmission between the CDN service provider POPs and the client computing devices 102, total data provided on behalf of the content provider 104 by the CDN service provider POPs, error rates for data transmissions, and the like.
In still a further example, the CDN service provider 106 can attempt to direct a DNS query to DNS servers according to network performance criteria. The network performance criteria can correspond to measurements of network performance for transmitting data from the CDN service provider POPs to the client computing device 102. Examples of network performance metrics can include network data transfer latencies (measured by the client computing device or the CDN service provider 106, network data error rates, and the like.
In accordance with an illustrative embodiment, the DNS server maintains a data store that defines CNAME records for various original URLs. If a DNS query corresponding to a particular original URL matches an entry in the data store, the DNS server returns a CNAME record as defined in the data store. In an illustrative embodiment, the data store can include multiple CNAME records corresponding to a particular original URL. The multiple CNAME records would define a set of potential candidates that can be returned to the client computing device. In such an embodiment, the DNS server, either directly or via a network-based service, can implement additional logic in selecting an appropriate CNAME from a set of possible of CNAMEs. In an illustrative embodiment, each DNS server component 118, 124, 130 maintains the same data stores that define CNAME records, which can be managed centrally by the CDN service provider 106. Alternatively, each DNS server component 118, 124, 130 can have POP specific data stores that define CNAME records, which can be managed centrally by the CDN service provider 106 or locally at the POP 116, 122, 128. Still further, each DNS server computing device within the DNS server components 118, 124, 130 can utilize shared data stores managed by a respective POP or a local data store specific to an individual DNS server computing device.
The returned CNAME can also include request routing information that is different from or in addition to the information provided in the URL/CNAME of the current DNS query. For example, a specific regional plan can be identified in the “request_routing_information” portion of the specific CNAME record. A similar approach could be taken to identify service level plans and file management by including a specific identifier in the “request_routing_information” portion of the CNAME record. In another embodiment, request routing information can be found in the identification of a CDN service provider 106 domain different from the domain found in the current URL/CNAME. For example, a specific regional plan domain (e.g., “cdnprovder-region1.com”) could be used in the domain name portion of the specific CNAME record. Any additional request routing information can be prepended to the existing request routing information in the current URL/CNAME such that the previous request routing information would not be lost (e.g., serviceplan.regionalplan.cdnprovider.com). One skilled in the relevant art will appreciate that additional or alternative techniques and/or combination of techniques may be used to include the additional request routing information in the CNAME record that is selected by the DNS server component 118.
With continued reference to
With reference now to
For purposes of illustration, assume that the DNS server component 124 processes the content request by returning an IP address of a resource cache component. In an illustrative embodiment, the DNS server component 124 can utilize a variety of information in selecting a resource cache component. In one example, the DNS server component 124 can default to a selection of a resource cache component of the same POP. In another example, the DNS server components can select a resource cache component based on various load balancing or load sharing algorithms. Still further, the DNS server components can utilize network performance metrics or measurements to assign specific resource cache components. The IP address selected by a DNS server component may correspond to a specific caching server in the resource cache. Alternatively, the IP address can correspond to a hardware/software selection component (such as a load balancer).
With reference now to
With reference now to
At block 702, one of the DNS server components 118, 124, 130 receives a DNS query corresponding to a resource identifier. As previously discussed, the resource identifier can be a URL that has been embedded in content requested by the client computing device 102 and previously provided by the content provider 104. Alternatively, the resource identifier can also correspond to a CNAME provided by a content provider DNS server in response to a DNS query previously received from the client computing device 102. The receiving DNS server also obtains an IP address associated with the DNS query from the requesting client computing device 102 (“query IP address”) at block 702. The query IP address can correspond to an IP address of the client computing device or any local DNS resolver component associated with the client computing device.
Next, at block 704, the receiving DNS server obtains a location-based identifier associated with the query IP address. Each DNS server maintains (or otherwise has access to) a data store 134 mapping a set of location-based identifiers with at least portions of known IP addresses (e.g., mapping a specific location-based identifier with a specific IP address or specific partial IP address). Utilizing the data store 134, the receiving DNS server attempts to match the IP address associated with the client computing device 102 DNS query (as transmitted via the local DNS resolver component) with the IP addresses in the data store 134. If the query IP address can be partially matched to an IP address in the data store 134, the DNS server identifies a corresponding location-based identifier. As similarly set forth above, the location-based identifiers can correspond to locations directly determined based on physical locations or logical locations associated with the origin of the DNS query. Additionally, the location-based identifier can be inferred based on associating a relative location to known locations. For example, the location-based identifier can be attributed to known locations of POPs (corresponding to the CDN service provider) based on measured latency information associated with request routing between the client computing device or its local DNS resolver and these POPs. The measured latency information can be premeasured, such as through testing procedures or previously observed request routing behavior. Alternatively, the measured latency information can be dynamically measured in a real time basis or semi-real time basis.
In an illustrative embodiment, the DNS server also optionally obtains a confidence factor associated with the location-based identifier from the data store 134 at block 704. The confidence factor corresponds to a degree of confidence in the accuracy of the associated location-based identifier to the query IP address. The optional confidence factor will be further discussed in reference to
Next, at a block 706, the receiving DNS server determines a POP from a set of one or more POPs associated with the obtained location-based identifier for resolving the resource request. Generally, the set of one or more POPs are capable of servicing resource requests from a region associated with the identified location of the requesting client computing device 102. As will be described further below,
At decision block 708, a test is conducted to determine whether the current DNS server is authoritative to resolve the DNS query. In one illustrative embodiment, the DNS server can determine whether it is authoritative to resolve the DNS query if the determined POP for resolving the resource request corresponds to the same POP associated with the receiving DNS server. If the determined POP indeed corresponds to the same POP associated with the receiving DNS server, then the receiving DNS server is considered to be authoritative, and the receiving DNS server identifies a cache server associated with the resource cache component from the same POP to process a subsequent client resource request (e.g., a request for the embedded resource) at block 710. The receiving DNS server resolves the DNS query by returning the IP address of, for example, a default or specific cache server or a load balancing component (as appropriate) associated with the resource cache component from the same POP. A number of methodologies for selecting an appropriate resource cache component at the POP may be implemented.
Alternatively, if at decision block 708 the determined POP corresponds to another POP of the CDN service provider 106, and hence the receiving DNS server is not authoritative, the receiving DNS server selects and transmits an alternative resource identifier at block 712. Specifically, in one embodiment, the receiving DNS server identifies an appropriate CNAME corresponding to the selected POP and transmits the CNAME to the client computing device 102. At block 714, different DNS server components 118, 124, 130 then receive a DNS query from the client computing device 102 corresponding to the CNAME. The routine 700 then returns to decision block 708 and continues to repeat as appropriate.
Alternative or additional methodologies may also be practiced to determine whether the DNS server is authoritative. In one embodiment, the receiving DNS server may maintain one or more CNAMEs that define various alternatives for request routing processing based on geographic regions of the CDN service provider 106. In this embodiment, instead of determining a POP associated with the obtained location-based identifier at block 706, the receiving DNS server can determine a destination identifier associated with the obtained location of the client computing device, as will be similarly discussed below in reference to
With reference now to
At decision block 802, where the receiving DNS server of the CDN service provider 106 has obtained a confidence factor associated with the location-based identifier (from block 704 of
However, in an alternative embodiment, the foregoing functionality associated with obtaining and analyzing the confidence factor may be eliminated. In one embodiment, this functionality may instead be implemented as a preprocessing step such that the query IP address to location-based identifier mappings provided in the data store 134 already take a confidence assessment into consideration. For example, prior to generating the query IP address to location-based identifier mappings, any data mapping entry having a low confidence factor may be filtered out of the data mappings. The filtered query IP address to location-based identifier mappings may then be used by the CDN service provider 106 to determine a destination identifier at block 806.
Returning to block 806 of
In an illustrative embodiment, the receiving DNS server utilizes the manually generated table mapping location-based identifiers to destination identifiers based on vector mapping and additional CDN administrator manipulation. The destination identifier corresponds to a definition of a geographic region encompassing one or more locations (e.g., a West Coast destination encompassing the states of Washington, Oregon and California). However, the DNS server may be configured to override the default destination identifier in accordance with a manually configured exception process determined as a function of the identity of the content provider (as obtained through the content provider identifier included in the DNS query).
In one embodiment, a CDN administrator can override the allocation of a destination identifier for specific content provider identifiers. For example, the DNS server can utilize the content provider identifier to ensure that the content provider's subscription with CDN service provider 106 allows content to be served from the destination identified in the mapping table. As another example, the content provider identifier can be manually designated to be associated with an alternative destination identifier to redistribute at least a portion of incoming resource requests for a particular content provider among several POPs (e.g., to avoid servicing content requests for a single web page via a single destination by offloading to a different destination).
Next, at block 808, based on the selected destination identifier, the receiving DNS server selects a POP from a list of one or more POPs that have been manually determined by the CDN administrator to be capable of servicing resource requests for the identified destination. If more than one POP is identified in the list of POPS, the receiving DNS server can select a specific POP according a specified distribution allocation for the corresponding destination (e.g., POP A (75%); POP B (25%)).
The receiving DNS server then determines whether the selected POP is available at decision block 810. In one embodiment, the DNS server evaluates the availability of the selected POP using POP health information indicative of the availability of the selected POP to process incoming resource requests. If the selected POP is available (as indicated via the POP health information), the receiving DNS server maintains the POP selection from block 808. Accordingly, the process will return to decision block 708 of
If the selected POP is not available (as indicated via the POP health information), the receiving DNS server can select an alternative POP at block 814 to process the DNS query. In one embodiment, the alternative POP can be selected via a failover list of alternative POPs that is manually set by a CDN administrator. Specifically, the receiving DNS server can select a specific alternative POP from the failover list according to a specified distribution. As similarly described above, processing will then return to decision block 708 of
It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art and others that all of the functions described in this disclosure may be embodied in software executed by one or more processors of the disclosed components and mobile communication devices. The software may be persistently stored in any type of non-volatile storage.
Conditional language, such as, among others, “can,” “could,” “might,” or “may,” unless specifically stated otherwise, or otherwise understood within the context as used, is generally intended to convey that certain embodiments include, while other embodiments do not include, certain features, elements and/or steps. Thus, such conditional language is not generally intended to imply that features, elements and/or steps are in any way required for one or more embodiments or that one or more embodiments necessarily include logic for deciding, with or without user input or prompting, whether these features, elements and/or steps are included or are to be performed in any particular embodiment.
Any process descriptions, elements, or blocks in the flow diagrams described herein and/or depicted in the attached figures should be understood as potentially representing modules, segments, or portions of code which include one or more executable instructions for implementing specific logical functions or steps in the process. Alternate implementations are included within the scope of the embodiments described herein in which elements or functions may be deleted, executed out of order from that shown or discussed, including substantially concurrently or in reverse order, depending on the functionality involved, as would be understood by those skilled in the art. It will further be appreciated that the data and/or components described above may be stored on a computer-readable medium and loaded into memory of the computing device using a drive mechanism associated with a computer readable storing the computer executable components such as a CD-ROM, DVD-ROM, or network interface further, the component and/or data can be included in a single device or distributed in any manner. Accordingly, general purpose computing devices may be configured to implement the processes, algorithms and methodology of the present disclosure with the processing and/or execution of the various data and/or components described above.
It should be emphasized that many variations and modifications may be made to the above-described embodiments, the elements of which are to be understood as being among other acceptable examples. All such modifications and variations are intended to be included herein within the scope of this disclosure and protected by the following claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/272,687, entitled “Request Routing Utilizing Client Location Information” and filed on Nov. 17, 2008, which in turn is related to U.S. application Ser. No. 11/771,679, filed on Jun. 29, 2007 and entitled “Mapping Attributes to Network Addresses,” the disclosures of which are both herein incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5341477 | Pitkin et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5611049 | Pitts | Mar 1997 | A |
5774660 | Brendel et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5892914 | Pitts | Apr 1999 | A |
6016512 | Huitema | Jan 2000 | A |
6026452 | Pitts | Feb 2000 | A |
6052718 | Gifford | Apr 2000 | A |
6085234 | Pitts et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6098096 | Tsirigotis et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6108703 | Leighton et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6182111 | Inohara et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6185598 | Farber et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6192051 | Lipman et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6205475 | Pitts | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6275496 | Burns et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6286043 | Cuomo et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6286084 | Wexler et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6304913 | Rune | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6351743 | DeArdo et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6351775 | Yu | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6363411 | Dugan et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6366952 | Pitts | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6374290 | Scharber et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6415280 | Farber et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6457047 | Chandra et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6484143 | Swildens et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6505241 | Pitts | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6553413 | Leighton et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6560610 | Eatherton et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6654807 | Farber et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6658462 | Dutta | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6678791 | Jacobs et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6694358 | Swildens et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6732237 | Jacobs et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6754699 | Swildens et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6754706 | Swildens et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6769031 | Bero | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6785704 | McCanne | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6804706 | Pitts | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6829654 | Jungck | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6874017 | Inoue et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6963850 | Bezos et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6981017 | Kasriel et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6986018 | O'Rourke et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6990526 | Zhu | Jan 2006 | B1 |
6996616 | Leighton et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7003555 | Jungck | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7006099 | Gut et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7007089 | Freedman | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7010578 | Lewin et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7010598 | Sitaraman et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7032010 | Swildens et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7058706 | Iyer et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7058953 | Willard et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7065587 | Huitema et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7072982 | Teodosiu et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7082476 | Cohen et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7086061 | Joshi et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7092505 | Allison et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7092997 | Kasriel et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7099936 | Chase et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7103645 | Leighton et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7117262 | Bai et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7133905 | Dilley et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7143169 | Champagne et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7146560 | Dang et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7149809 | Barde et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7152118 | Anderson, IV et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7174382 | Ramanathan et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7185063 | Kasriel et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7188214 | Kasriel et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7194522 | Swildens et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7200667 | Teodosiu et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7225254 | Swildens et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
7228350 | Hong et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7233978 | Overton et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7240100 | Wein et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7254636 | O'Toole, Jr. et al. | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7260598 | Liskov et al. | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7269784 | Kasriel et al. | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7289519 | Liskov | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7310686 | Uysal | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7316648 | Kelly et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7320131 | O'Toole, Jr. | Jan 2008 | B1 |
7321918 | Burd et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7363291 | Page | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7441045 | Skene et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7461170 | Taylor et al. | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7464142 | Flurry et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7492720 | Pruthi et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7499998 | Toebes et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7502836 | Menditto et al. | Mar 2009 | B1 |
7519720 | Fishman et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7548947 | Kasriel et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7552235 | Chase et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7565407 | Hayball | Jul 2009 | B1 |
7573916 | Bechtolsheim et al. | Aug 2009 | B1 |
7624169 | Lisiecki et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7650376 | Blumenau | Jan 2010 | B1 |
7653700 | Bahl et al. | Jan 2010 | B1 |
7657622 | Douglis et al. | Feb 2010 | B1 |
7680897 | Carter et al. | Mar 2010 | B1 |
7702724 | Brydon et al. | Apr 2010 | B1 |
7706740 | Collins et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7707314 | McCarthy et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7716367 | Leighton et al. | May 2010 | B1 |
7739400 | Lindbo et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7747720 | Toebes et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7756913 | Day | Jul 2010 | B1 |
7761572 | Auerbach | Jul 2010 | B1 |
7769823 | Jenny et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7773596 | Marques | Aug 2010 | B1 |
7774342 | Virdy | Aug 2010 | B1 |
7792989 | Toebes et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7809597 | Das et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7813308 | Reddy et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7818454 | Kim et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7836177 | Kasriel et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7904875 | Hegyi | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7912921 | O'Rourke et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7925782 | Sivasubramanian et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7930393 | Baumback et al. | Apr 2011 | B1 |
7930427 | Josefsberg et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7962597 | Richardson et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7966404 | Hedin et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7991910 | Richardson et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
7996535 | Auerbach | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8000724 | Rayburn et al. | Aug 2011 | B1 |
8028090 | Richardson et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8065275 | Eriksen et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8073940 | Richardson et al. | Dec 2011 | B1 |
8082348 | Averbuj et al. | Dec 2011 | B1 |
8117306 | Baumback et al. | Feb 2012 | B1 |
8122098 | Richardson et al. | Feb 2012 | B1 |
20010032133 | Moran | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010034704 | Farhat et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010049741 | Skene et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010056416 | Garcia-Luna-Aceves | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010056500 | Farber et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020007413 | Garcia-Luna-Aceves et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020048269 | Hong et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020049608 | Hartsell et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020052942 | Swildens et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020062372 | Hong et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020068554 | Dusse | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020069420 | Russell et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020078233 | Biliris et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020083118 | Sim | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020083148 | Shaw et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020087374 | Boubez et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020092026 | Janniello et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020099616 | Sweldens | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020099850 | Farber et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020101836 | Dorenbosch | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020116481 | Lee | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020124098 | Shaw | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020129123 | Johnson et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020138286 | Engstrom | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020138437 | Lewin et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020147770 | Tang | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020156911 | Croman et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020163882 | Bornstein et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020188722 | Banerjee et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030002484 | Freedman | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030009591 | Hayball et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030037139 | Shteyn | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030065739 | Shnier | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030074401 | Connell et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030099202 | Lear et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030101278 | Garcia-Luna-Aceves et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030133554 | Nykanen et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030135509 | Davis et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030140087 | Lincoln et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030145066 | Okada et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030149581 | Chaudhri et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030163722 | Anderson, IV | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030172183 | Anderson, IV et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030174648 | Wang et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030182413 | Allen et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030187935 | Agarwalla et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030187970 | Chase et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030191822 | Leighton et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030204602 | Hudson et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030229682 | Day | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030233423 | Dilley et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030236700 | Arning et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040010621 | Afergan et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040019518 | Abraham et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040024841 | Becker et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040030620 | Benjamin et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040034744 | Karlsson et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040039798 | Hotz et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040044791 | Pouzzner | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040064501 | Jan et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040073596 | Kloninger et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040073867 | Kausik et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040078468 | Hedin et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040078487 | Cernohous et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040083307 | Uysal | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040117455 | Kaminksy et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040128344 | Trossen | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040167981 | Douglas et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040172466 | Douglas et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040194085 | Beaubien et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040203630 | Wang | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040205149 | Dillon et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040205162 | Parikh | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040215823 | Kleinfelter et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040249971 | Klinker | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040249975 | Tuck et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040267906 | Truty | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040267907 | Gustafsson | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050010653 | McCanne | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050021706 | Maggi et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050038967 | Umbehocker et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050044270 | Grove et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050108169 | Balasubramanian et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050108529 | Juneau | May 2005 | A1 |
20050114296 | Farber et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050132083 | Raciborski et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050157712 | Rangarajan et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050171959 | Deforche et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050188073 | Nakamichi et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050192008 | Desai et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050216569 | Coppola et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050216674 | Robbin et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050232165 | Brawn et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050259672 | Eduri | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050262248 | Jennings, III et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050267991 | Huitema et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050267992 | Huitema et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050267993 | Huitema et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050278259 | Gunaseelan et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060013158 | Ahuja et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060020596 | Liu et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060020684 | Mukherjee et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060020715 | Jungck | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060026067 | Nicholas et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060026154 | Altinel et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060036720 | Faulk, Jr. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060037037 | Miranz | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060047787 | Agarwal et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060063534 | Kokkonen et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060064500 | Roth et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060074750 | Clark et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060075084 | Lyon | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060075139 | Jungck | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060083165 | McLane et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060112176 | Liu et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060120385 | Atchison et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060143293 | Freedman | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060155823 | Tran et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060161541 | Cencini | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060168088 | Leighton et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060190605 | Franz et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060193247 | Naseh et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195866 | Thukral | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060230137 | Gare et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060233155 | Srivastava | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060253546 | Chang et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060253609 | Andreev et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060259984 | Juneau | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060265508 | Angel et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060265516 | Schilling | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060265720 | Cai et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060271641 | Stavrakos et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060282522 | Lewin et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070005689 | Leighton et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070005892 | Mullender et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070011267 | Overton et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070014241 | Banerjee et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070038994 | Davis et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070041393 | Westhead et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070043859 | Ruul | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070050522 | Grove et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070055764 | Dilley et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070076872 | Juneau | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070094361 | Hoynowski et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070101377 | Six et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070118667 | McCarthy et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070118668 | McCarthy et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070134641 | Lieu | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070168517 | Weller | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070174426 | Swildens et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070174442 | Sherman et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070183342 | Wong et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070208737 | Li et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070219795 | Park et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070220010 | Ertugrul | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070244964 | Challenger et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070250467 | Mesnik et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070250560 | Wein et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070266113 | Koopmans et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070266311 | Westphal | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070266333 | Cossey et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070271385 | Davis et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070280229 | Kenney | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070288588 | Wein et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080005057 | Ozzie et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080008089 | Bornstein et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080025304 | Venkataswami et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080046596 | Afergan et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080065724 | Seed et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080065745 | Leighton et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080071859 | Seed et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080071987 | Karn et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080072264 | Crayford | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080082551 | Farber et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080086574 | Raciborski et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080103805 | Shear et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080104268 | Farber et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080114829 | Button et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080134043 | Georgis et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080147866 | Stolorz et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080147873 | Matsumoto | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080155061 | Afergan et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080155614 | Cooper et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080162667 | Verma et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080189437 | Halley | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080201332 | Souders et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080215718 | Stolorz et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080215735 | Farber et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080215750 | Farber et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080222281 | Dilley et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080222291 | Weller et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080222295 | Robinson et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080228920 | Souders et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080235400 | Slocombe et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080275772 | Suryanarayana et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080281950 | Wald et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080288722 | Lecoq et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080301670 | Gouge et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080319862 | Golan et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090013063 | Soman | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090016236 | Alcala et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090029644 | Sue et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090031367 | Sue | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090031368 | Ling | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090031376 | Riley et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090049098 | Pickelsimer et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090070533 | Elazary et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090086741 | Zhang | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090103707 | McGary et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090106381 | Kasriel et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090112703 | Brown | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090125934 | Jones et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090132368 | Cotter et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090144412 | Ferguson et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090150926 | Schlack | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090157850 | Gagliardi et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090158163 | Stephens et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090164331 | Bishop et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090177667 | Ramos et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090182815 | Czechowski et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090182945 | Aviles et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090187575 | DaCosta | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090204682 | Jeyaseelan et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090210549 | Hudson et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090248787 | Sivasubramanian et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090248852 | Fuhrmann et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090248858 | Sivasubramanian et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090248893 | Richardson et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090259971 | Rankine et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090271577 | Campana et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090271730 | Rose et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090279444 | Ravindran et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090287750 | Banavar et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090307307 | Igarashi | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090327517 | Sivasubramanian et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100005175 | Swildens et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100011061 | Hudson et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100023601 | Lewin et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100030662 | Klein | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100036944 | Douglis et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100088367 | Brown et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100100629 | Raciborski et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100111059 | Bappu et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100121953 | Friedman et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100122069 | Gonion | May 2010 | A1 |
20100150155 | Napierala | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100192225 | Ma et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100217801 | Leighton et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100226372 | Watanabe | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100257566 | Matila | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100293479 | Rousso et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100299439 | McCarthy et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100332595 | Fullagar et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110078000 | Ma et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110238501 | Almeida | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110252142 | Richardson et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110258049 | Ramer et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO 2007007960 | Jan 2007 | WO |
WO 2012044587 | Apr 2012 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120066408 A1 | Mar 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12272687 | Nov 2008 | US |
Child | 13232878 | US |