Request routing utilizing client location information

Abstract
A system, method, and computer-readable medium for request routing based on client location information are provided. A content delivery network service provider receives a DNS query from a client computing device. The DNS query corresponds to a resource identifier for requested content from the client computing device. The content delivery network service provider transmits an alternative resource identifier in response to the client computing device DNS query. The alternative resource identifier is selected as a function of client location information. The client location information is obtained from information corresponding to a mapping of at least partial IP addresses to known locations. The client computing device then issues a second DNS query to the same content delivery network service provider. The content delivery network service provider can then either resolve the second DNS query or transmit another alternative resource identifier.
Description
BACKGROUND

Generally described, computing devices and communication networks can be utilized to exchange information. In a common application, a computing device can request content from another computing device via the communication network. For example, a user at a personal computing device can utilize a software browser application to request a Web page from a server computing device via the Internet. In such embodiments, the user computing device can be referred to as a client computing device and the server computing device can be referred to as a content provider.


Content providers are generally motivated to provide requested content to client computing devices often with consideration of efficient transmission of the requested content to the client computing device and/or consideration of a cost associated with the transmission of the content. For larger scale implementations, a content provider may receive content requests from a high volume of client computing devices which can place a strain on the content provider's computing resources. Additionally, the content requested by the client computing devices may have a number of components, which can further place additional strain on the content provider's computing resources.


With reference to an illustrative example, a requested Web page, or original content, may be associated with a number of additional resources, such as images or videos, which are to be displayed with the Web page. In one specific embodiment, the additional resources of the Web page are identified by a number of embedded resource identifiers, such as uniform resource locators (“URLs”). In turn, software on the client computing devices typically processes embedded resource identifiers to generate requests for the content. Often, the resource identifiers associated with the embedded resources reference a computing device associated with the content provider such that the client computing device would transmit the request for the additional resources to the referenced content provider computing device. Accordingly, in order to satisfy a content request, the content provider would provide client computing devices data associated with the Web page as well as the data associated with the embedded resources.


Some content providers attempt to facilitate the delivery of requested content, such as Web pages and/or resources identified in Web pages, through the utilization of a content delivery network (“CDN”) service provider. A CDN server provider typically maintains a number of computing devices in a communication network that can maintain content from various content providers. In turn, content providers can instruct, or otherwise suggest to, client computing devices to request some, or all, of the content provider's content from the CDN service provider's computing devices.


As with content providers, CDN service providers are also generally motivated to provide requested content to client computing devices often with consideration of efficient transmission of the requested content to the client computing device and/or consideration of a cost associated with the transmission of the content. Accordingly, CDN service providers often consider factors such as latency of delivery of requested content in order to meet service level agreements or to generally improve the quality of delivery service.





DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The foregoing aspects and many of the attendant advantages of this invention will become more readily appreciated as the same become better understood by reference to the following detailed description, when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:



FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrative of content delivery environment including a number of client computing devices, a content provider, and a content delivery network service provider;



FIG. 2 is a block diagram of the content delivery environment of FIG. 1 illustrating the registration of a content provider with a content delivery service provider;



FIG. 3 is a block diagram of the content delivery environment of FIG. 1 illustrating the generation and processing of a content request from a client computing device to a content provider;



FIGS. 4A-4B are block diagrams of the content delivery environment of FIG. 1 illustrating one embodiment of the generation and processing of a DNS query corresponding to an embedded resource from a client computing device to a content delivery network service provider and the subsequent generation and processing of DNS queries corresponding to a first alternative resource identifier from a client computing device to a content delivery network;



FIG. 5 is a block diagram of the content delivery environment of FIG. 1 illustrating another embodiment of the generation and processing of a DNS query corresponding to an embedded resource from a client computing device to a content delivery network service provider;



FIG. 6 is a block diagram of the content delivery environment of FIG. 1 illustrating the generation and processing of embedded resource requests from a client computing device to a content delivery network service provider;



FIG. 7 is a flow diagram illustrative of a request routing routine implemented by a content delivery network service provider utilizing query IP address to location-based identifier mappings to process a resource request; and



FIG. 8 is a flow diagram illustrative a request routing subroutine implemented by a content delivery network service provider in the illustrative flow diagram of FIG. 7 for determining a network point of presence for servicing a resource request based on an obtained location-based identifier.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Generally described, the present disclosure is directed to routing of DNS queries from a client computing device corresponding to content requests by a network resource, such as content delivery network (“CDN”) service providers. The processing of a DNS query by a CDN service provider is generally referred to as request routing. Specifically, aspects of the disclosure will be described with regard to the routing of a client computing device DNS query within a content delivery network service provider domain as a function of client location information associated with the processing of the content request from the client computing device. In one embodiment, a CDN service provider utilizes query IP address to location-based identifier mappings to select components of a CDN network to provide the requested resource. The CDN network component can be selected by identifying a client computing device's location and attempting to improve performance associated with the request routing by transmitting requested resources from a CDN network component in a destination associated with the client's location. Although various aspects of the disclosure will be described with regard to illustrative examples and embodiments, one skilled in the art will appreciate that the disclosed embodiments and examples should not be construed as limiting.



FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrative of content delivery environment 100 for the management and processing of content requests. As illustrated in FIG. 1, the content delivery environment 100 includes a number of client computing devices 102 (generally referred to as clients) for requesting content from a content provider and/or a CDN service provider. In an illustrative embodiment, the client computing devices 102 can correspond to a wide variety of computing devices including personal computing devices, laptop computing devices, hand-held computing devices, terminal computing devices, mobile devices, wireless devices, various electronic devices and appliances and the like. In an illustrative embodiment, the client computing devices 102 include necessary hardware and software components for establishing communications over a communication network 108, such as a wide area network or local area network. For example, the client computing devices 102 may be equipped with networking equipment and browser software applications that facilitate communications via the Internet or an intranet.


Although not illustrated in FIG. 1, each client computing device 102 utilizes some type of local DNS resolver component, such as a DNS name server, that generates the DNS queries attributed to the client computing device. In one embodiment, the local DNS resolver component may be provided by an enterprise network to which the client computing device 102 belongs. In another embodiment, the local DNS resolver component may be provided by an Internet Service Provider (ISP) that provides the communication network connection to the client computing device 102.


The content delivery environment 100 can also include a content provider 104 in communication with the one or more client computing devices 102 via the communication network 108. The content provider 104 illustrated in FIG. 1 corresponds to a logical association of one or more computing devices associated with a content provider. Specifically, the content provider 104 can include a web server component 110 corresponding to one or more server computing devices for obtaining and processing requests for content (such as Web pages) from the client computing devices 102. The content provider 104 can further include an origin server component 112 and associated storage component 114 corresponding to one or more computing devices for obtaining and processing requests for network resources from the CDN service provider. One skilled in the relevant art will appreciate that the content provider 104 can be associated with various additional computing resources, such additional computing devices for administration of content and resources, DNS name servers, and the like. For example, although not illustrated in FIG. 1, the content provider 104 can be associated with one or more DNS name server components that are operative to receive DNS queries related to registered domain names associated with the content provider. The one or more DNS name servers can be authoritative to resolve client computing device DNS queries corresponding to the registered domain names of the content provider 104. A DNS name server component is considered to be authoritative to a DNS query if the DNS name server can resolve the query by providing a responsive IP address.


With continued reference to FIG. 1, the content delivery environment 100 can further include a CDN service provider 106 in communication with the one or more client computing devices 102 and the content providers 104 via the communication network 108. The CDN service provider 106 illustrated in FIG. 1 corresponds to a logical association of one or more computing devices associated with a CDN service provider. Specifically, the CDN service provider 106 can include a number of Point of Presence (“POP”) locations 116, 122, 128 that correspond to nodes on the communication network 108. Each POP 116, 122, 128 includes a DNS component 118, 124, 130 made up of a number of DNS server computing devices for resolving DNS queries from the client computers 102. Each POP 116, 122, 128 also includes a resource cache component 120, 126, 132 made up of a number of cache server computing devices for storing resources from content providers and transmitting various requested resources to various client computers.


Still further, the CDN service provider 106 includes a routing data store 134 for maintaining information regarding query IP address to location-based identifier mappings, as well as confidence factors associated with those mappings, such as disclosed in U.S. application Ser. No. 11/771,679, which is herein incorporated by reference. In some embodiments, the location-based identifiers can correspond to locations directly determined based on physical locations or logical locations associated with the origin of the DNS query. In addition or alternatively, the location-based identifier can be inferred based on associating a relative location to known locations. For example, the location-based identifier can be attributed to known locations of POPs (corresponding to the CDN service provider) based on measured latency information associated with request routing between the client computing device or its local DNS resolver and these POPs. The measured latency information can be premeasured, such as through testing procedures or previously observed request routing behavior. Alternatively, the measured latency information can be dynamically measured in a real time basis or semi-real time basis.


The routing data store 134 can also maintain additional location mapping information such as mappings of the location-based identifiers to regional CDN destination identifiers. Even further, the location mapping data store 134 can include information identifying a set of POPs associated with each CDN destination identifier. Yet further, the routing data store 134 can include user profile information from which alternative user location information may be obtained. Yet still further, the routing data store 134 can include content provider routing criteria associated with a content provider identifier (or origin identifier), such as regional service plan information or other routing criteria, utilized by the CDN service provider 106 to route content requests.


In an illustrative embodiment, the routing data store 134 corresponds to a central data store accessible by the POPs 116, 122, 128, such as via a Web service. In another embodiment, each POP 116, 122, 128 can maintain a local version of a routing data store 134 for utilization in request routing as will be explained in greater detail. Additionally, although the routing data store 134 is illustrated as a single data store, one skilled in the relevant art will appreciate that routing data store 134 may correspond to one or more data stores and may be implemented in a distributed manner.


The DNS components 118, 124 and 130 and the resource cache components 120, 126132 may further include additional software and/or hardware components that facilitate communications including, but not limited, load balancing or load sharing software/hardware components.


In an illustrative embodiment, the DNS component 118, 124, 130 and resource cache component 120, 126, 132 are considered to be logically grouped, regardless of whether the components, or portions of the components, are physically separate. Additionally, although the POPs 116, 122, 128 are illustrated in FIG. 1 as logically associated with the CDN service provider 106, the POPs will be geographically distributed throughout the communication network 108 in a manner to best serve various demographics of client computing devices 102. Additionally, one skilled in the relevant art will appreciate that the CDN service provider 106 can be associated with various additional computing resources, such additional computing devices for administration of content and resources, and the like.


One skilled in the relevant art will appreciate that the components and configurations provided in FIG. 1 are illustrative in nature. Accordingly, additional or alternative components and/or configurations, especially regarding the additional components, systems and subsystems for facilitating communications may be utilized.


With reference now to FIGS. 2-6, the interaction between various components of the content delivery environment 100 of FIG. 1 will be illustrated. For purposes of the example, however, the illustration has been simplified such that many of the components utilized to facilitate communications are not shown. One skilled in the relevant art will appreciate that such components can be utilized and that additional interactions would accordingly occur without departing from the spirit and scope of the present disclosure.


With reference to FIG. 2, an illustrative interaction for registration of a content provider 104 with the CDN service provider 106 will be described. As illustrated in FIG. 2, the CDN content registration process begins with registration of the content provider 104 with the CDN service provider 106. In an illustrative embodiment, the content provider 104 utilizes a registration application program interface (“API”) to register with the CDN service provider 106 such that the CDN service provider 106 can provide content on behalf of the content provider 104. The registration API includes the identification of the origin server 112 of the content provider 104 that will provide requested resources to the CDN service provider 106. Additionally, as will be explained in greater detail below, the content provider 104 can also provide additional information, such as regional service plan information or other routing criteria, utilized by the CDN service provider 106 to route content requests. In one embodiment, the routing criteria can include the specification of a particular regional service plan, which may limit the regions from which content requests may be resolved by the CDN service provider 106. In another embodiment, the routing criteria can include a selection by the content provider 104 that the CDN service provider 106 should attempt to service specific resource requests from a particular regional destination or POP or from a particular distribution of regional destinations or POPs.


One skilled in the relevant art will appreciate that upon identification of appropriate origin servers 112, the content provider 104 can begin to direct requests for content from client computing devices 102 to the CDN service provider 106. Specifically, in accordance with DNS routing principles, a client computing device request corresponding to a resource identifier would eventually be directed toward a POP 116, 122, 128 associated with the CDN service provider 106. In the event that the resource cache component 120, 126, 132 of a selected POP does not have a copy of a resource requested by a client computing device 102, the resource cache component will request the resource from the origin server 112 previously registered by the content provider 104.


With continued reference to FIG. 2, upon receiving the registration API, the CDN service provider 106 obtains and processes the registration information. In an illustrative embodiment, the CDN service provider 106 can then generate additional information that will be used by the client computing devices 102 as part of the content requests. The additional information can include, without limitation, content provider identifiers, such as content provider identification codes or origin server identifiers, executable code for processing resource identifiers, such as script-based instructions, and the like. One skilled in the relevant art will appreciate that various types of additional information may be generated by the CDN service provider 106 and that the additional information may be embodied in any one of a variety of formats.


The CDN service provider 106 returns an identification of applicable domains for the CDN service provider (unless it has been previously provided) and any additional information to the content provider 104. In turn, the content provider 104 can then process the stored content with content provider specific information. In one example, as illustrated in FIG. 2, the content provider 104 translates resource identifiers originally directed toward a domain of the origin server 112 to a domain corresponding to the CDN service provider. The translated URLs are embedded into requested content in a manner such that DNS queries for the translated URLs will resolve to a DNS server corresponding to the CDN service provider 106 and not a DNS server corresponding to the content provider 104. Although the translation process is illustrated in FIG. 2, in some embodiments, the translation process may be omitted in a manner described in greater detail below.


Generally, the identification of the resources originally directed to the content provider 104 will be in the form of a resource identifier that can be processed by the client computing device 102, such as through a browser software application. In an illustrative embodiment, the resource identifiers can be in the form of a uniform resource locator (“URL”). Because the resource identifiers are included in the requested content directed to the content provider, the resource identifiers can be referred to generally as the “content provider URL.” For purposes of an illustrative example, the content provider URL can identify a domain of the content provider 104 (e.g., contentprovider.com), a name of the resource to be requested (e.g., “resource.xxx”) and a path where the resource will be found (e.g., “path”). In this illustrative example, the content provider URL has the form of:


http://www.contentprovider.com/path/resource.xxx


During an illustrative translation process, the content provider URL is modified such that requests for the resources associated with the translated URLs resolve to a POP associated with the CDN service provider 106. In one embodiment, the translated URL identifies the domain of the CDN service provider 106 (e.g., “cdnprovider.com”), the same name of the resource to be requested (e.g., “resource.xxx”) and the same path where the resource will be found (e.g., “path”). Additionally, the translated URL can include additional processing information (e.g., “additional information”). Specifically, as set forth above, in one illustrative embodiment, the additional information can include a content provider identifier. Additionally, the translated URL can include any additional information utilized by the CDN service provider during the request routing information, including, but not limited to, service plan information, file identifiers, and the like. Such information may be included in the modified URL or may be omitted from the translated URL and obtained by the CDN service provider 106 during the request routing process, such as by a lookup according to a content provider identifier. The translated URL would have the form of:


http://additional_information.cdnprovider.com/path/resource.xxx


In another embodiment, the information associated with the CDN service provider 106 is included in the modified URL, such as through prepending or other techniques, such that the translated URL can maintain all of the information associated with the original URL. In this embodiment, the translated URL would have the form of:


http://additional_information.cdnprovider.com/www.contentprovider.com/path/resource.xxx


With reference now to FIG. 3, after completion of the registration and translation processes illustrated in FIG. 2, a client computing device 102 subsequently generates a content request that is received and processed by the content provider 104, such as through the Web server 110. In accordance with an illustrative embodiment, the request for content can be in accordance with common network protocols, such as the hypertext transfer protocol (“HTTP”). Upon receipt of the content request, the content provider 104 identifies the appropriate responsive content. In an illustrative embodiment, the requested content can correspond to a Web page that is displayed on the client computing device 102 via the processing of information, such as hypertext markup language (“HTML”), extensible markup language (“XML”), and the like. The requested content can also include a number of embedded resource identifiers, described above, that corresponds to resource objects that should be obtained by the client computing device 102 as part of the processing of the requested content. The embedded resource identifiers can be generally referred to as original resource identifiers or original URLs.


Upon receipt of the requested content, the client computing device 102, such as through a browser software application, begins processing any of the markup code included in the content and attempts to acquire the resources identified by the embedded resource identifiers. Accordingly, the first step in acquiring the content corresponds to the issuance, by the client computing device 102 (through its local DNS resolver), of a DNS query for the original URL resource identifier that results in the identification of a DNS server authoritative to the “.” and the “com” portions of the translated URL. After processing the “.” and “com” portions of the embedded URL, the client computing device 102 then issues a DNS query for the resource URL that results in the identification of a DNS server authoritative to the “.cdnprovider” portion of the embedded URL. The issuance of DNS queries corresponding to the “.” and the “com” portions of a URL are well known and have not been illustrated.


With reference now to FIG. 4A, in an illustrative embodiment, the successful resolution of the “cdnprovider” portion of the original URL identifies a network address, such as an IP address, of a DNS server associated with the CDN service provider 106. In one embodiment, the IP address can be a specific network address unique to a DNS server component of a POP. In another embodiment, the IP address can be shared by one or more POPs. In this embodiment, a further DNS query to the shared IP address utilizes a one-to-many network routing schema, such as anycast, such that a specific POP will receive the request as a function of network topology. For example, in an anycast implementation, a DNS query issued by a client computing device 102 to a shared IP address will arrive at a DNS server component logically having the shortest network topology distance, often referred to as network hops, from the client computing device. The network topology distance does not necessarily correspond to geographic distance. However, in some embodiments, the network topology distance can be inferred to be the shortest network distance between a client computing device 102 and a POP.


With continued reference to FIG. 4A, in either of the above identified embodiments (or any other embodiment), a specific DNS server in the DNS component 118 of a POP 116 receives the DNS query corresponding to the original URL from the client computing device 102. Once one of the DNS servers in the DNS component 118 receives the request, the specific DNS server attempts to resolve the request. In one illustrative embodiment, as shown in reference to FIG. 5, a specific DNS server resolves the DNS query by identifying an IP address of a cache server component that will process the request for the requested resource. As described above and as will be described further below in reference to FIG. 6, a selected resource cache component can process the request by either providing the requested resource if it is available or attempt to obtain the requested resource from another source, such as a peer cache server computing device or the origin server 112 of the content provider 104.


Returning to FIG. 4A, as an alternative to selecting a resource cache component upon receipt of a DNS query as described in reference to FIG. 5, the CDN service provider 106 can maintain sets of various alternative resource identifiers. The alternative resource identifiers can be provided by the CDN service provider 106 to the client computing device 102 such that a subsequent DNS query on the alternative resource identifier will be processed by a different DNS server component within the CDN service provider's network. In an illustrative embodiment, the alternative resource identifiers are in the form of one or more canonical name (“CNAME”) records. In one embodiment, each CNAME record identifies a domain of the CDN service provider 106 (e.g., “cdnprovider.com” or “cdnprovider-1.com”). As will be explained in greater detail below, the domain in the CNAME does not need to be the same domain found in original URL or in a previous CNAME record. Additionally, each CNAME record includes additional information, such as request routing information, (e.g., “request routing information”). An illustrative CNAME record can have the form of:


http://request_routing_information.cdnprovider.com/path/resource.xxx


CNAME request_routing_information.cdnprovider.com


In an illustrative embodiment, the CNAME records are generated and provided by the DNS servers to identify a more appropriate DNS server of the CDN service provider 106. As used in accordance with the present disclosure, appropriateness can be defined in any manner by the CDN service provider 106 for a variety of purposes. In an illustrative embodiment, as will be described in greater detail below in reference to FIGS. 7 and 8, the CDN service provider 106 will utilize client location information associated with the client computing device 102 or its local DNS resolver, at least in part, to identify the more appropriate DNS server of the CDN service provider 106. In particular, the CDN service provider 106 can utilize an IP address associated with a client computing device DNS query to identify a corresponding location-based identifier representing a possible location of the client computing device. The CDN service provider 106 can then, in turn, utilize the location-based identifier to identify a destination identifier representing a geographic region associated with the CDN service provider 106 from which the resource request should be resolved. Based on the destination identifier, the CDN service provider 106 can then select a POP 116, 122, 128 from a set of POPs that are capable of servicing resource requests for the destination corresponding to the destination identifier. In one example, if more than one POP is identified in the set, the CDN service provider 106 can utilize a distribution allocation for selecting a specific POP associated with the identified destination. In another example, once a POP is selected, the CDN service provider 106 can further use health information to determine whether the selected POP is available to service requests before providing the client computing device with a CNAME corresponding to the selected POP. One skilled in the art will appreciate that the above functionality is illustrative in nature and accordingly should not be construed as limiting.


As described above, in addition to the consideration of client location information (either of the end-client or its associated local DNS resolver component), the CDN service provider 106 can utilize the additional information (e.g., the “additional information”) included in the translated URL to select a more appropriate DNS server. In one aspect, the CDN service provider 106 can utilize the additional information to select from a set of DNS servers identified as satisfying criteria associated with the client location information. In another aspect, the CDN service provider 106 can utilize the additional information to validate the DNS server selected in accordance with the client location information or to select an alternative DNS server previously selected in accordance with the client location information. In one example, the CDN service provider 106 can attempt to direct a DNS query to DNS servers according to additional geographic criteria. The additional geographic criteria can correspond to geographic-based regional service plans contracted between the CDN service-provider 106 and the content provider 104 in which various CDN service provider 106 POPs are grouped into geographic regions. Accordingly, a client computing device 102 DNS query received in a region not corresponding to the content provider's regional plan may be better processed by a DNS server in region corresponding to the content provider's regional plan.


In another example, the CDN service provider 106 can attempt to direct a DNS query to DNS servers according to service level criteria. The service level criteria can correspond to service or performance metrics contracted between the CDN service provider 106 and the content provider 104. Examples of performance metrics can include latencies of data transmission between the CDN service provider POPs and the client computing devices 102, total data provided on behalf of the content provider 104 by the CDN service provider POPs, error rates for data transmissions, and the like.


In still a further example, the CDN service provider 106 can attempt to direct a DNS query to DNS servers according to network performance criteria. The network performance criteria can correspond to measurements of network performance for transmitting data from the CDN service provider POPs to the client computing device 102. Examples of network performance metrics can include network data transfer latencies (measured by the client computing device or the CDN service provider 106, network data error rates, and the like.


In accordance with an illustrative embodiment, the DNS server maintains a data store that defines CNAME records for various original URLs. If a DNS query corresponding to a particular original URL matches an entry in the data store, the DNS server returns a CNAME record as defined in the data store. In an illustrative embodiment, the data store can include multiple CNAME records corresponding to a particular original URL. The multiple CNAME records would define a set of potential candidates that can be returned to the client computing device. In such an embodiment, the DNS server, either directly or via a network-based service, can implement additional logic in selecting an appropriate CNAME from a set of possible of CNAMEs. In an illustrative embodiment, each DNS server component 118, 124, 130 maintains the same data stores that define CNAME records, which can be managed centrally by the CDN service provider 106. Alternatively, each DNS server component 118, 124, 130 can have POP specific data stores that define CNAME records, which can be managed centrally by the CDN service provider 106 or locally at the POP 116, 122, 128. Still further, each DNS server computing device within the DNS server components 118, 124, 130 can utilize shared data stores managed by a respective POP or a local data store specific to an individual DNS server computing device.


The returned CNAME can also include request routing information that is different from or in addition to the information provided in the URL/CNAME of the current DNS query. For example, a specific regional plan can be identified in the “request_routing_information” portion of the specific CNAME record. A similar approach could be taken to identify service level plans and file management by including a specific identifier in the “request_routing_information” portion of the CNAME record. In another embodiment, request routing information can be found in the identification of a CDN service provider 106 domain different from the domain found in the current URL/CNAME. For example, a specific regional plan domain (e.g., “cdnprovider region1.com”) could be used in the domain name portion of the specific CNAME record. Any additional request routing information can be prepended to the existing request routing information in the current URL/CNAME such that the previous request routing information would not be lost (e.g., serviceplan.regionalplan.cdnprovider.com). One skilled in the relevant art will appreciate that additional or alternative techniques and/or combination of techniques may be used to include the additional request routing information in the CNAME record that is selected by the DNS server component 118.


With continued reference to FIG. 4A, one skilled in the relevant art will appreciate that the DNS server may select (or otherwise obtain) a CNAME record that is intended to resolve to a more appropriate DNS server of the CDN service provider 106. It may be possible, however, that the same DNS server would also be authoritative for the subsequent DNS query for the CNAME to be provided to the client computing device. For example, a specific DNS server may be authoritative based on the client location information. Thus, returning a CNAME would still result in the DNS query arriving at the same DNS server (which may also be due in part to the client computing device's geography). In such an embodiment, the DNS server, such as DNS server component 118, may choose to resolve the future DNS query in advance.


With reference now to FIG. 4B, upon receipt of the CNAME from the DNS server component 118, the client computing device 102 generates a subsequent DNS query corresponding to the CNAME. As previously discussed with regard to FIG. 4A, the DNS query process could first start with DNS queries for the “.” and “com” portions, followed by a query for the “cdnprovider” portion of the CNAME. To the extent, however, that the results of a previous DNS queries can be cached (and remain valid), the client computing device 102 can utilize the cached information and does not need to repeat the entire process. However, at some point, depending on whether the CNAME provided by DNS server component 118 (FIG. 4A) and the previous URL/CNAME share common CDN service provider domains, the current CNAME DNS query will be processed by a different POP provided by the CDN service provider 106. As illustrated in FIG. 4B, the DNS server component 124 of POP 122 receives the current CNAME based on the different information in the current CNAME previously provided by the DNS server component 118. As previously described, the DNS server component 124 can then determine whether to resolve the DNS query on the CNAME with an IP address of a cache component that will process the content request or whether to provide another alternative resource identifier selected in the manners described above.


For purposes of illustration, assume that the DNS server component 124 processes the content request by returning an IP address of a resource cache component. In an illustrative embodiment, the DNS server component 124 can utilize a variety of information in selecting a resource cache component. In one example, the DNS server component 124 can default to a selection of a resource cache component of the same POP. In another example, the DNS server components can select a resource cache component based on various load balancing or load sharing algorithms. Still further, the DNS server components can utilize network performance metrics or measurements to assign specific resource cache components. The IP address selected by a DNS server component may correspond to a specific caching server in the resource cache. Alternatively, the IP address can correspond to a hardware/software selection component (such as a load balancer).


With reference now to FIG. 6, in an illustrative example, assume that the DNS server component 124 has selected the resource cache component 126 of POP 122. Upon receipt of the IP address for the resource cache component 126, the client computing device 102 transmits a request for the requested content to the resource cache component 126. The resource cache component 126 processes the request in a manner described above and the requested content is transmitted to the client computing device 102.


With reference now to FIG. 7, one embodiment of a request routine 700 implemented by the CDN service provider 106 for processing a resource request will be described. One skilled in the relevant art will appreciate that actions/steps outlined for routine 700 may be implemented by one or many computing devices/components that are associated with the CDN service provider 106. Accordingly, routine 700 has been logically associated as being generally performed by the CDN service provider 106, and thus the following illustrative embodiments should not be construed as limiting.


At block 702, one of the DNS server components 118, 124, 130 receives a DNS query corresponding to a resource identifier. As previously discussed, the resource identifier can be a URL that has been embedded in content requested by the client computing device 102 and previously provided by the content provider 104. Alternatively, the resource identifier can also correspond to a CNAME provided by a content provider DNS server in response to a DNS query previously received from the client computing device 102. The receiving DNS server also obtains an IP address associated with the DNS query from the requesting client computing device 102 (“query IP address”) at block 702. The query IP address can correspond to an IP address of the client computing device or any local DNS resolver component associated with the client computing device.


Next, at block 704, the receiving DNS server obtains a location-based identifier associated with the query IP address. Each DNS server maintains (or otherwise has access to) a data store 134 mapping a set of location-based identifiers with at least portions of known IP addresses (e.g., mapping a specific location-based identifier with a specific IP address or specific partial IP address). Utilizing the data store 134, the receiving DNS server attempts to match the IP address associated with the client computing device 102 DNS query (as transmitted via the local DNS resolver component) with the IP addresses in the data store 134. If the query IP address can be partially matched to an IP address in the data store 134, the DNS server identifies a corresponding location-based identifier. As similarly set forth above, the location-based identifiers can correspond to locations directly determined based on physical locations or logical locations associated with the origin of the DNS query. Additionally, the location-based identifier can be inferred based on associating a relative location to known locations. For example, the location-based identifier can be attributed to known locations of POPs (corresponding to the CDN service provider) based on measured latency information associated with request routing between the client computing device or its local DNS resolver and these POPs. The measured latency information can be premeasured, such as through testing procedures or previously observed request routing behavior. Alternatively, the measured latency information can be dynamically measured in a real time basis or semi-real time basis.


In an illustrative embodiment, the DNS server also optionally obtains a confidence factor associated with the location-based identifier from the data store 134 at block 704. The confidence factor corresponds to a degree of confidence in the accuracy of the associated location-based identifier to the query IP address. The optional confidence factor will be further discussed in reference to FIG. 8.


Next, at a block 706, the receiving DNS server determines a POP from a set of one or more POPs associated with the obtained location-based identifier for resolving the resource request. Generally, the set of one or more POPs are capable of servicing resource requests from a region associated with the identified location of the requesting client computing device 102. As will be described further below, FIG. 8 illustrates one embodiment of a request routing subroutine for performing the functionality associated with block 706.


At decision block 708, a test is conducted to determine whether the current DNS server is authoritative to resolve the DNS query. In one illustrative embodiment, the DNS server can determine whether it is authoritative to resolve the DNS query if the determined POP for resolving the resource request corresponds to the same POP associated with the receiving DNS server. If the determined POP indeed corresponds to the same POP associated with the receiving DNS server, then the receiving DNS server is considered to be authoritative, and the receiving DNS server identifies a cache server associated with the resource cache component from the same POP to process a subsequent client resource request (e.g., a request for the embedded resource) at block 710. The receiving DNS server resolves the DNS query by returning the IP address of, for example, a default or specific cache server or a load balancing component (as appropriate) associated with the resource cache component from the same POP. A number of methodologies for selecting an appropriate resource cache component at the POP may be implemented.


Alternatively, if at decision block 708 the determined POP corresponds to another POP of the CDN service provider 106, and hence the receiving DNS server is not authoritative, the receiving DNS server selects and transmits an alternative resource identifier at block 712. Specifically, in one embodiment, the receiving DNS server identifies an appropriate CNAME corresponding to the selected POP and transmits the CNAME to the client computing device 102. At block 714, different DNS server components 118, 124, 130 then receive a DNS query from the client computing device 102 corresponding to the CNAME. The routine 700 then returns to decision block 708 and continues to repeat as appropriate.


Alternative or additional methodologies may also be practiced to determine whether the DNS server is authoritative. In one embodiment, the receiving DNS server may maintain one or more CNAMEs that define various alternatives for request routing processing based on geographic regions of the CDN service provider 106. In this embodiment, instead of determining a POP associated with the obtained location-based identifier at block 706, the receiving DNS server can determine a destination identifier associated with the obtained location of the client computing device, as will be similarly discussed below in reference to FIG. 8 at block 806. The DNS server in this alternative embodiment can then select an appropriate CNAME of an alternative POP based on the determined destination identifier alone or in combination with other request routing criteria.


With reference now to FIG. 8, one embodiment of a request routing subroutine 800 for selecting a POP associated with the location of the requesting client computing device will be described. One skilled in the relevant art will appreciate that actions/steps outlined for routine 800 may be implemented by one or many computing devices/components that are associated with the CDN service provider 106. Accordingly, routine 800 has been logically associated as being performed by the CDN service provider 106.


At decision block 802, where the receiving DNS server of the CDN service provider 106 has obtained a confidence factor associated with the location-based identifier (from block 704 of FIG. 7), a test is performed to determine whether the confidence factor exceeds a minimum threshold value. If the confidence factor does not exceed a minimum threshold, the DNS server assigns a default location-based identifier at block 804. In one embodiment, the default location-based identifier may correspond to the location of the receiving DNS server. If the confidence factor associated with the obtained location-based identifier exceeds the minimum threshold at block 802 or after a default location-based identifier is assigned at block 804, the receiving DNS server determines a destination identifier for the DNS query at block 806.


However, in an alternative embodiment, the foregoing functionality associated with obtaining and analyzing the confidence factor may be eliminated. In one embodiment, this functionality may instead be implemented as a preprocessing step such that the query IP address to location-based identifier mappings provided in the data store 134 already take a confidence assessment into consideration. For example, prior to generating the query IP address to location-based identifier mappings, any data mapping entry having a low confidence factor may be filtered out of the data mappings. The filtered query IP address to location-based identifier mappings may then be used by the CDN service provider 106 to determine a destination identifier at block 806.


Returning to block 806 of FIG. 8, in one embodiment, the receiving DNS server determines the destination identifier according to a manually generated table from the data store 134 in which the destination identifier is determined as a function of the location-based identifier. However, the receiving DNS server can also provide an alternative destination identifier in accordance with a manually initiated administrative process. One embodiment of the selection of the initial destination identifier and the manually initiated administrative process follows.


In an illustrative embodiment, the receiving DNS server utilizes the manually generated table mapping location-based identifiers to destination identifiers based on vector mapping and additional CDN administrator manipulation. The destination identifier corresponds to a definition of a geographic region encompassing one or more locations (e.g., a West Coast destination encompassing the states of Washington, Oregon and California). However, the DNS server may be configured to override the default destination identifier in accordance with a manually configured exception process determined as a function of the identity of the content provider (as obtained through the content provider identifier included in the DNS query).


In one embodiment, a CDN administrator can override the allocation of a destination identifier for specific content provider identifiers. For example, the DNS server can utilize the content provider identifier to ensure that the content provider's subscription with CDN service provider 106 allows content to be served from the destination identified in the mapping table. As another example, the content provider identifier can be manually designated to be associated with an alternative destination identifier to redistribute at least a portion of incoming resource requests for a particular content provider among several POPs (e.g., to avoid servicing content requests for a single web page via a single destination by offloading to a different destination).


Next, at block 808, based on the selected destination identifier, the receiving DNS server selects a POP from a list of one or more POPs that have been manually determined by the CDN administrator to be capable of servicing resource requests for the identified destination. If more than one POP is identified in the list of POPS, the receiving DNS server can select a specific POP according a specified distribution allocation for the corresponding destination (e.g., POP A (75%); POP B (25%)).


The receiving DNS server then determines whether the selected POP is available at decision block 810. In one embodiment, the DNS server evaluates the availability of the selected POP using POP health information indicative of the availability of the selected POP to process incoming resource requests. If the selected POP is available (as indicated via the POP health information), the receiving DNS server maintains the POP selection from block 808. Accordingly, the process will return to decision block 708 of FIG. 7, where if the receiving DNS server is not authoritative, the receiving DNS server returns a CNAME that will result in the receipt of the DNS query by the selected POP (or one of a set of identified POPs). If, however, the selected POP corresponds to the current POP of the receiving DNS server (i.e., the receiving DNS server is authoritative), the receiving DNS server resolves the DNS query by returning the IP address of the default resource cache component at the POP as the CNAME does not necessarily need to be provided (unless additional request routing processing will be implemented).


If the selected POP is not available (as indicated via the POP health information), the receiving DNS server can select an alternative POP at block 814 to process the DNS query. In one embodiment, the alternative POP can be selected via a failover list of alternative POPs that is manually set by a CDN administrator. Specifically, the receiving DNS server can select a specific alternative POP from the failover list according to a specified distribution. As similarly described above, processing will then return to decision block 708 of FIG. 7, where if the receiving DNS server is not authoritative for the alternative POP, the receiving DNS server returns a CNAME that will result in the receipt of the DNS query by the selected alternative POP (or one of a set of POPs). If, however, the selected alternative POP corresponds to the current POP of the receiving DNS server (i.e., the receiving DNS server is authoritative), the receiving DNS server resolves the DNS query by returning the IP address of the default resource cache component at the alternative POP as the CNAME does not necessarily need to be provided (unless additional request routing processing will be implemented).


It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art and others that all of the functions described in this disclosure may be embodied in software executed by one or more processors of the disclosed components and mobile communication devices. The software may be persistently stored in any type of non-volatile storage.


Conditional language, such as, among others, “can,” “could,” “might,” or “may,” unless specifically stated otherwise, or otherwise understood within the context as used, is generally intended to convey that certain embodiments include, while other embodiments do not include, certain features, elements and/or steps. Thus, such conditional language is not generally intended to imply that features, elements and/or steps are in any way required for one or more embodiments or that one or more embodiments necessarily include logic for deciding, with or without user input or prompting, whether these features, elements and/or steps are included or are to be performed in any particular embodiment.


Any process descriptions, elements, or blocks in the flow diagrams described herein and/or depicted in the attached figures should be understood as potentially representing modules, segments, or portions of code which include one or more executable instructions for implementing specific logical functions or steps in the process. Alternate implementations are included within the scope of the embodiments described herein in which elements or functions may be deleted, executed out of order from that shown or discussed, including substantially concurrently or in reverse order, depending on the functionality involved, as would be understood by those skilled in the art. It will further be appreciated that the data and/or components described above may be stored on a computer-readable medium and loaded into memory of the computing device using a drive mechanism associated with a computer readable storing the computer executable components such as a CD-ROM, DVD-ROM, or network interface further, the component and/or data can be included in a single device or distributed in any manner. Accordingly, general purpose computing devices may be configured to implement the processes, algorithms and methodology of the present disclosure with the processing and/or execution of the various data and/or components described above.


It should be emphasized that many variations and modifications may be made to the above-described embodiments, the elements of which are to be understood as being among other acceptable examples. All such modifications and variations are intended to be included herein within the scope of this disclosure and protected by the following claims.

Claims
  • 1. A computer-implemented method comprising: as implemented by one or more computing devices configured with specific executable instructions, obtaining a DNS query from a client computing device at a first DNS server, wherein the DNS query corresponds to a requested resource associated with an original resource identifier provided by a content provider and wherein the first DNS server corresponds to a content delivery network service;obtaining a query IP address associated with the DNS query at the first DNS server, wherein the query IP address is associated with the client computing device;obtaining a location-based identifier associated with the query IP address and a confidence factor, the confidence factor corresponding to a degree of confidence associated with the accuracy of the location-based identifier to query IP address association;determining whether the confidence factor exceeds a threshold value; andif the confidence factor exceeds the threshold value: determining a destination identifier associated with the DNS query, wherein the destination identifier is determined based on the location-based identifier; andselecting a network point of presence associated with the content delivery network service provider based on the destination identifier.
  • 2. The method as recited in claim 1 further comprising: determining whether the first DNS server is authoritative to the DNS query based on the selected network point of presence; andif the first DNS server is determined to be authoritative: selecting a cache component for providing content associated with the original resource request; andtransmitting information identifying the selected cache component.
  • 3. The method as recited in claim 1 further comprising assigning a location-based identifier associated with the first DNS server if the confidence factor does not exceed the threshold value.
  • 4. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the destination identifier corresponds to a geographic region encompassing a location associated with the location-based identifier.
  • 5. The method as recited in claim 1 further comprising overriding the determined destination identifier based on the original resource identifier, wherein the original resource identifier provides information associated with an alternative destination identifier.
  • 6. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein selecting a network point of presence comprises selecting a network point of presence from a set of network points of presence capable of servicing resource requests associated with the determined destination identifier.
  • 7. The method as recited in claim 6, wherein the network point of presence is selected from the set of network points of presence based on a distribution allocation.
  • 8. The method as recited in claim 1 further comprising: determining whether the selected network point of presence is available prior to determining whether the first DNS server is authoritative to the DNS query based on the selected network point of presence;if the selected network point of presence is available, maintaining the selected network point of presence; andif the selected network point of presence is not available, selecting an alternative network point of presence.
  • 9. The method as recited in claim 1 further comprising overriding the determined destination identifier based on an identity of the content provider.
  • 10. The method as recited in claim 9, wherein the determined destination identifier is overridden if the content provider's subscription with the content delivery network service provider does not provide for content to be provided from a destination corresponding to the destination identifier.
  • 11. The method as recited in claim 9, wherein the determined destination identifier is overridden if the content provider's subscription with the content delivery network service provider provides for use of an alternative destination identifier.
  • 12. A system for request routing comprising: a first network point of presence associated with a content delivery network (CDN) service provider, wherein the first network point of presence includes a first DNS server that receives a DNS query from a client computing device, wherein the DNS query corresponds to a requested resource associated with a first resource identifier provided by a content provider, and wherein the first DNS server in the first network point of presence comprises at least one computing device associated with a memory and is operative to: obtain a query IP address associated with the DNS query at the first DNS server, wherein the query IP address is associated with the client computing device;obtain a location-based identifier associated with the query IP address and a confidence factor, the confidence factor corresponding to a degree of confidence associated with the accuracy of the location-based identifier to query IP address association;determine whether the confidence factor exceeds a threshold value; andif the confidence factor exceeds the threshold value: determine a destination identifier associated with the DNS query, wherein the destination identifier is determined based on the location-based identifier; andselect a network point of presence associated with the content delivery network service provider based on the destination identifier.
  • 13. The system as recited in claim 12, wherein the first DNS server in the first network point of presence is further operative to: determine whether the first DNS server is authoritative to the DNS query based on the selected network point of presence; andif the first DNS server is determined to be authoritative: select a cache component for providing content associated with the original resource request associated with the first resource identifier; andtransmit information identifying the selected cache component.
  • 14. The system as recited in claim 12, wherein the first DNS server in the first network point of presence is further operative to assign a location-based identifier associated with the first DNS server if the confidence factor does not exceed the threshold value.
  • 15. The system as recited in claim 12, wherein the destination identifier corresponds to a geographic region encompassing a location associated with the location-based identifier.
  • 16. The system as recited in claim 12, wherein the first DNS server in the first network point of presence is further operative to override the determined destination identifier based on the original resource identifier, wherein the original resource identifier provides information associated with an alternative destination identifier.
  • 17. The system as recited in claim 12, wherein selecting a network point of presence comprises selecting a network point of presence from a set of network points of presence capable of servicing resource requests associated with the determined destination identifier.
  • 18. The system as recited in claim 17, wherein the network point of presence is selected from the set of network points of presence based on a distribution allocation.
  • 19. The system as recited in claim 12, wherein the first DNS server in the first network point of presence is further operative to: determine whether the selected network point of presence is available prior to determining whether the first DNS server is authoritative to the DNS query based on the selected network point of presence;if the selected network point of presence is available, maintain the selected network point of presence; andif the selected network point of presence is not available, select an alternative network point of presence.
  • 20. The system as recited in claim 12, wherein the first DNS server in the first network point of presence is further operative to override the determined destination identifier based on an identity of the content provider.
  • 21. The system as recited in claim 20, wherein the determined destination identifier is overridden if the content provider's subscription with the content delivery network service provider does not provide for content to be provided from a destination corresponding to the destination identifier.
  • 22. The system as recited in claim 20, wherein the determined destination identifier is overridden if the content provider's subscription with the content delivery network service provider provides for use of an alternative destination identifier.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/232,878 entitled “REQUEST ROUTING UTILIZING CLIENT LOCATION INFORMATION” and filed on Sep. 14, 2011, which in turn is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/272,687, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,028,090, entitled “REQUEST ROUTING UTILIZING CLIENT LOCATION INFORMATION” and filed on Nov. 17, 2008, which in turn is related to U.S. application Ser. No. 11/771,679, filed on Jun. 29, 2007 and entitled “MAPPING ATTRIBUTES TO NETWORK ADDRESSES,” the disclosures of which are herein incorporated by reference.

US Referenced Citations (417)
Number Name Date Kind
5341477 Pitkin et al. Aug 1994 A
5611049 Pitts Mar 1997 A
5774660 Brendel et al. Jun 1998 A
5892914 Pitts Apr 1999 A
6016512 Huitema Jan 2000 A
6026452 Pitts Feb 2000 A
6052718 Gifford Apr 2000 A
6085234 Pitts et al. Jul 2000 A
6098096 Tsirigotis et al. Aug 2000 A
6108703 Leighton et al. Aug 2000 A
6182111 Inohara et al. Jan 2001 B1
6185598 Farber et al. Feb 2001 B1
6192051 Lipman et al. Feb 2001 B1
6205475 Pitts Mar 2001 B1
6275496 Burns et al. Aug 2001 B1
6286043 Cuomo et al. Sep 2001 B1
6286084 Wexler et al. Sep 2001 B1
6304913 Rune Oct 2001 B1
6351743 DeArdo et al. Feb 2002 B1
6351775 Yu Feb 2002 B1
6363411 Dugan et al. Mar 2002 B1
6366952 Pitts Apr 2002 B2
6374290 Scharber et al. Apr 2002 B1
6415280 Farber et al. Jul 2002 B1
6457047 Chandra et al. Sep 2002 B1
6484143 Swildens et al. Nov 2002 B1
6505241 Pitts Jan 2003 B2
6553413 Leighton et al. Apr 2003 B1
6560610 Eatherton et al. May 2003 B1
6611873 Kanehara Aug 2003 B1
6654807 Farber et al. Nov 2003 B2
6658462 Dutta Dec 2003 B1
6678791 Jacobs et al. Jan 2004 B1
6694358 Swildens et al. Feb 2004 B1
6732237 Jacobs et al. May 2004 B1
6754699 Swildens et al. Jun 2004 B2
6754706 Swildens et al. Jun 2004 B1
6769031 Bero Jul 2004 B1
6785704 McCanne Aug 2004 B1
6804706 Pitts Oct 2004 B2
6829654 Jungck Dec 2004 B1
6874017 Inoue et al. Mar 2005 B1
6963850 Bezos et al. Nov 2005 B1
6981017 Kasriel et al. Dec 2005 B1
6986018 O'Rourke et al. Jan 2006 B2
6990526 Zhu Jan 2006 B1
6996616 Leighton et al. Feb 2006 B1
7003555 Jungck Feb 2006 B1
7006099 Gut et al. Feb 2006 B2
7007089 Freedman Feb 2006 B2
7010578 Lewin et al. Mar 2006 B1
7010598 Sitaraman et al. Mar 2006 B2
7032010 Swildens et al. Apr 2006 B1
7058706 Iyer et al. Jun 2006 B1
7058953 Willard et al. Jun 2006 B2
7065587 Huitema et al. Jun 2006 B2
7072982 Teodosiu et al. Jul 2006 B2
7082476 Cohen et al. Jul 2006 B1
7086061 Joshi et al. Aug 2006 B1
7092505 Allison et al. Aug 2006 B2
7092997 Kasriel et al. Aug 2006 B1
7099936 Chase et al. Aug 2006 B2
7103645 Leighton et al. Sep 2006 B2
7117262 Bai et al. Oct 2006 B2
7133905 Dilley et al. Nov 2006 B2
7143169 Champagne et al. Nov 2006 B1
7146560 Dang et al. Dec 2006 B2
7149809 Barde et al. Dec 2006 B2
7152118 Anderson, IV et al. Dec 2006 B2
7174382 Ramanathan et al. Feb 2007 B2
7185063 Kasriel et al. Feb 2007 B1
7188214 Kasriel et al. Mar 2007 B1
7194522 Swildens et al. Mar 2007 B1
7200667 Teodosiu et al. Apr 2007 B2
7225254 Swildens et al. May 2007 B1
7228350 Hong et al. Jun 2007 B2
7233978 Overton et al. Jun 2007 B2
7240100 Wein et al. Jul 2007 B1
7254636 O'Toole, Jr. et al. Aug 2007 B1
7260598 Liskov et al. Aug 2007 B1
7269784 Kasriel et al. Sep 2007 B1
7289519 Liskov Oct 2007 B1
7293093 Leighton Nov 2007 B2
7310686 Uysal Dec 2007 B2
7316648 Kelly et al. Jan 2008 B2
7320131 O'Toole, Jr. Jan 2008 B1
7321918 Burd et al. Jan 2008 B2
7363291 Page Apr 2008 B1
7441045 Skene et al. Oct 2008 B2
7461170 Taylor et al. Dec 2008 B1
7464142 Flurry et al. Dec 2008 B2
7492720 Pruthi et al. Feb 2009 B2
7499998 Toebes et al. Mar 2009 B2
7502836 Menditto et al. Mar 2009 B1
7519720 Fishman et al. Apr 2009 B2
7548947 Kasriel et al. Jun 2009 B2
7552235 Chase et al. Jun 2009 B2
7565407 Hayball Jul 2009 B1
7573916 Bechtolsheim et al. Aug 2009 B1
7624169 Lisiecki et al. Nov 2009 B2
7650376 Blumenau Jan 2010 B1
7653700 Bahl et al. Jan 2010 B1
7657622 Douglis et al. Feb 2010 B1
7680897 Carter et al. Mar 2010 B1
7702724 Brydon et al. Apr 2010 B1
7706740 Collins et al. Apr 2010 B2
7707314 McCarthy et al. Apr 2010 B2
7716367 Leighton et al. May 2010 B1
7725602 Liu et al. May 2010 B2
7739400 Lindbo et al. Jun 2010 B2
7747720 Toebes et al. Jun 2010 B2
7756913 Day Jul 2010 B1
7761572 Auerbach Jul 2010 B1
7769823 Jenny et al. Aug 2010 B2
7773596 Marques Aug 2010 B1
7774342 Virdy Aug 2010 B1
7792989 Toebes et al. Sep 2010 B2
7809597 Das et al. Oct 2010 B2
7813308 Reddy et al. Oct 2010 B2
7818454 Kim et al. Oct 2010 B2
7836177 Kasriel et al. Nov 2010 B2
7904875 Hegyi Mar 2011 B2
7912921 O'Rourke et al. Mar 2011 B2
7925782 Sivasubramanian et al. Apr 2011 B2
7930393 Baumback et al. Apr 2011 B1
7930427 Josefsberg et al. Apr 2011 B2
7937477 Day et al. May 2011 B1
7949779 Farber et al. May 2011 B2
7962597 Richardson et al. Jun 2011 B2
7966404 Hedin et al. Jun 2011 B2
7979509 Malmskog et al. Jul 2011 B1
7991910 Richardson et al. Aug 2011 B2
7996535 Auerbach Aug 2011 B2
8000724 Rayburn et al. Aug 2011 B1
8028090 Richardson et al. Sep 2011 B2
8065275 Eriksen et al. Nov 2011 B2
8073940 Richardson et al. Dec 2011 B1
8082348 Averbuj et al. Dec 2011 B1
8117306 Baumback et al. Feb 2012 B1
8122098 Richardson et al. Feb 2012 B1
8234403 Richardson et al. Jul 2012 B2
8321568 Sivasubramanian et al. Nov 2012 B2
20010032133 Moran Oct 2001 A1
20010034704 Farhat et al. Oct 2001 A1
20010049741 Skene et al. Dec 2001 A1
20010056416 Garcia-Luna-Aceves Dec 2001 A1
20010056500 Farber et al. Dec 2001 A1
20020007413 Garcia-Luna-Aceves et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020048269 Hong et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020049608 Hartsell et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020052942 Swildens et al. May 2002 A1
20020062372 Hong et al. May 2002 A1
20020068554 Dusse Jun 2002 A1
20020069420 Russell et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020078233 Biliris et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020083118 Sim Jun 2002 A1
20020083148 Shaw et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020087374 Boubez et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020092026 Janniello et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020099616 Sweldens Jul 2002 A1
20020099850 Farber et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020101836 Dorenbosch Aug 2002 A1
20020107944 Bai et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020116481 Lee Aug 2002 A1
20020124098 Shaw Sep 2002 A1
20020129123 Johnson et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020138286 Engstrom Sep 2002 A1
20020138437 Lewin et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020143989 Huitema et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020147770 Tang Oct 2002 A1
20020156911 Croman et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020161767 Shapiro et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020163882 Bornstein et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020188722 Banerjee et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030002484 Freedman Jan 2003 A1
20030009591 Hayball et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030033283 Evans et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030037139 Shteyn Feb 2003 A1
20030065739 Shnier Apr 2003 A1
20030074401 Connell et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030099202 Lear et al. May 2003 A1
20030101278 Garcia-Luna-Aceves et al. May 2003 A1
20030120741 Wu et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030133554 Nykanen et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030135509 Davis et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030140087 Lincoln et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030145066 Okada et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030149581 Chaudhri et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030163722 Anderson, IV Aug 2003 A1
20030172183 Anderson, IV et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030174648 Wang et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030182413 Allen et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030187935 Agarwalla et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030187970 Chase et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030191822 Leighton et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030200394 Ashmore et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030204602 Hudson et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030229682 Day Dec 2003 A1
20030233423 Dilley et al. Dec 2003 A1
20030236700 Arning et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040010621 Afergan et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040019518 Abraham et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040024841 Becker et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040030620 Benjamin et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040034744 Karlsson et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040039798 Hotz et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040044791 Pouzzner Mar 2004 A1
20040064501 Jan et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040073596 Kloninger et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040073867 Kausik et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040078468 Hedin et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040078487 Cernohous et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040083307 Uysal Apr 2004 A1
20040117455 Kaminsky et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040128344 Trossen Jul 2004 A1
20040128346 Melamed et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040167981 Douglas et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040172466 Douglas et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040194085 Beaubien et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040203630 Wang Oct 2004 A1
20040205149 Dillon et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040205162 Parikh Oct 2004 A1
20040215823 Kleinfelter et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040249971 Klinker Dec 2004 A1
20040249975 Tuck et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040267906 Truty Dec 2004 A1
20040267907 Gustafsson Dec 2004 A1
20050010653 McCanne Jan 2005 A1
20050021706 Maggi et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050038967 Umbehocker et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050044270 Grove et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050108169 Balasubramanian et al. May 2005 A1
20050108529 Juneau May 2005 A1
20050114296 Farber et al. May 2005 A1
20050132083 Raciborski et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050157712 Rangarajan et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050163168 Sheth et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050171959 Deforche et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050188073 Nakamichi et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050192008 Desai et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050216569 Coppola et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050216674 Robbin et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050232165 Brawn et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050259672 Eduri Nov 2005 A1
20050262248 Jennings, III et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050267991 Huitema et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050267992 Huitema et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050267993 Huitema et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050278259 Gunaseelan et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060013158 Ahuja et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060020596 Liu et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060020684 Mukherjee et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060020715 Jungck Jan 2006 A1
20060026067 Nicholas et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060026154 Altinel et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060036720 Faulk, Jr. Feb 2006 A1
20060037037 Miranz Feb 2006 A1
20060041614 Oe Feb 2006 A1
20060047787 Agarwal et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060063534 Kokkonen et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060064500 Roth et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060074750 Clark et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060075084 Lyon Apr 2006 A1
20060075139 Jungck Apr 2006 A1
20060083165 McLane et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060112176 Liu et al. May 2006 A1
20060120385 Atchison et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060143293 Freedman Jun 2006 A1
20060155823 Tran et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060161541 Cencini Jul 2006 A1
20060168088 Leighton et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060190605 Franz et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060193247 Naseh et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060195866 Thukral Aug 2006 A1
20060227740 McLaughlin et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060230137 Gare et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060233155 Srivastava Oct 2006 A1
20060253546 Chang et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060253609 Andreev et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060259690 Vittal et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060259984 Juneau Nov 2006 A1
20060265508 Angel et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060265516 Schilling Nov 2006 A1
20060265720 Cai et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060271641 Stavrakos et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060282522 Lewin et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070005689 Leighton et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070005892 Mullender et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070011267 Overton et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070014241 Banerjee et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070038994 Davis et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070041393 Westhead et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070043859 Ruul Feb 2007 A1
20070050522 Grove et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070055764 Dilley et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070076872 Juneau Apr 2007 A1
20070094361 Hoynowski et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070101377 Six et al. May 2007 A1
20070118667 McCarthy et al. May 2007 A1
20070118668 McCarthy et al. May 2007 A1
20070134641 Lieu Jun 2007 A1
20070168517 Weller et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070174426 Swildens et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070174442 Sherman et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070174490 Choi et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070183342 Wong et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070208737 Li et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070219795 Park et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070220010 Ertugrul Sep 2007 A1
20070244964 Challenger et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070250467 Mesnik et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070250560 Wein et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070253377 Janneteau et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070266113 Koopmans et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070266311 Westphal Nov 2007 A1
20070266333 Cossey et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070271385 Davis et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070280229 Kenney Dec 2007 A1
20070288588 Wein et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080005057 Ozzie et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080008089 Bornstein et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080025304 Venkataswami et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080046596 Afergan et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080065724 Seed et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080065745 Leighton et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080071859 Seed et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080071987 Karn et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080072264 Crayford Mar 2008 A1
20080082551 Farber et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080086574 Raciborski et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080103805 Shear et al. May 2008 A1
20080114829 Button et al. May 2008 A1
20080134043 Georgis et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080147866 Stolorz et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080147873 Matsumoto Jun 2008 A1
20080155061 Afergan et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080155614 Cooper et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080162667 Verma et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080189437 Halley Aug 2008 A1
20080201332 Souders et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080215718 Stolorz et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080215735 Farber et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080215750 Farber et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080222281 Dilley et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080222291 Weller et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080222295 Robinson et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080228920 Souders et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080235400 Slocombe et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080275772 Suryanarayana et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080281950 Wald et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080288722 Lecoq et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080301670 Gouge et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080319862 Golan et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090013063 Soman Jan 2009 A1
20090016236 Alcala et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090029644 Sue et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090031367 Sue Jan 2009 A1
20090031368 Ling Jan 2009 A1
20090031376 Riley et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090049098 Pickelsimer et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090070533 Elazary et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090086741 Zhang Apr 2009 A1
20090103707 McGary et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090106381 Kasriel et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090112703 Brown Apr 2009 A1
20090125934 Jones et al. May 2009 A1
20090132368 Cotter et al. May 2009 A1
20090132648 Swildens et al. May 2009 A1
20090144412 Ferguson et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090150926 Schlack Jun 2009 A1
20090157850 Gagliardi et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090158163 Stephens et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090164331 Bishop et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090177667 Ramos et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090182815 Czechowski et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090182945 Aviles et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090187575 DaCosta Jul 2009 A1
20090204682 Jeyaseelan et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090210549 Hudson et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090248852 Fuhrmann et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090248858 Sivasubramanian et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090248893 Richardson et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090259971 Rankine et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090271577 Campana et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090271730 Rose et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090279444 Ravindran et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090287750 Banavar et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090307307 Igarashi Dec 2009 A1
20100005175 Swildens et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100011061 Hudson et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100023601 Lewin et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100030662 Klein Feb 2010 A1
20100036944 Douglis et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100070603 Moss et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100088367 Brown et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100100629 Raciborski et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100111059 Bappu et al. May 2010 A1
20100121953 Friedman et al. May 2010 A1
20100122069 Gonion May 2010 A1
20100150155 Napierala Jun 2010 A1
20100192225 Ma et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100217801 Leighton et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100226372 Watanabe Sep 2010 A1
20100257566 Matila Oct 2010 A1
20100293479 Rousso et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100299439 McCarthy et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100332595 Fullagar et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110040893 Karaoguz et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110078000 Ma et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110078230 Sepulveda Mar 2011 A1
20110153941 Spatscheck et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110238501 Almeida Sep 2011 A1
20110252142 Richardson et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110258049 Ramer et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110276623 Girbal Nov 2011 A1
20120066360 Ghosh Mar 2012 A1
20120179839 Raciborski et al. Jul 2012 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (3)
Number Date Country
1422468 Jun 2003 CN
WO 2007007960 Jan 2007 WO
WO 2012044587 Apr 2012 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (15)
Entry
American Bar Association; Digital Signature Guidelines Tutorial [online]; Feb. 10, 2002 [retrived on Feb. 3, 2010]; American Bar Association Section of Science and Technology Information Security Committee; Retrieved from the internet: <URL: http://web.archive.org/web/20020210124615/www.abanet.org/scitech/ec/isc/dsg-tutorial.html; pp. 1-8.
Baglioni et al., “Preprocessing and Mining Web Log Data for Web Personalization”, LNAI 2829, 2003, pp. 237-249.
First Office Action in Chinese Application No. 200980119993.1 dated Jul. 4, 2012.
First Office Action in Chinese Application No. 200980119995.0 dated Jul. 6, 2012.
International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2011/053302 mailed Nov. 28, 2011 in 11 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2011/061486 mailed Mar. 30, 2012 in 11 pages.
Liu et al., “Combined mining of Web server logs and web contents for classifying user navigation patterns and predicting users' future requests,” Data & Knowledge Engineering 61 (2007) pp. 304-330.
Singapore Examination Report in Application No. 201006837-7 mailed May 16, 2012.
Singapore Written Opinion in Application No. 201006836-9, mailed Apr. 30, 2012 in 10 pages.
Singapore Written Opinion in Application No. 201006836-9, mailed Oct. 12, 2011 in 12 pages.
Singapore Written Opinion in Application No. 201006837-7, mailed Oct. 12, 2011 in 11 pages.
Singapore Written Opinion in Application No. 201006874-0, mailed Oct. 12, 2011 in 10 pages.
Supplementary European Search Report in Application No. 09727694.3 mailed Jan. 30, 2012 in 6 pages.
Tan et al., “Classification: Basic Concepts, Decision Tree, and Model Evaluation”, Introduction in Data Mining; http://www-users.cs.umn.edu/˜kumar/dmbook/ch4.pdf, 2005, pp. 245-205.
Xu et al., “Decision tree regression for soft classification of remote sensing data”, Remote Sensing of Environment 97 (2005) pp. 322-336.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20130013808 A1 Jan 2013 US
Continuations (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 13232878 Sep 2011 US
Child 13620915 US
Parent 12272687 Nov 2008 US
Child 13232878 US