Resealable closure on seamed can end

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6206222
  • Patent Number
    6,206,222
  • Date Filed
    Monday, May 15, 2000
    25 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, March 27, 2001
    24 years ago
Abstract
An easy-open, reseable closure assembly for a beverage can (10) comprises a metal lid (12) and two threadedly connected molded plastic closure elements (40, 60) with engageable annular reseal surfaces (46, 76). The lid is scored (30) to define a circular tear panel (28) and a hinge (32). The spout element (40) is attached to the lid (12) with the bottom surface of the cap element (60) directly above and aligned with the periphery of the tear panel (28). Rotation of the cap element (60) by a user ruptures the tear panel and pivots the tear panel (28) downward about the hinge (32), providing a passage through the spout element (40) for pouring and driking. Initial rupture and rupture propagation of the tear panel (28) is controlled by the spacing of the cap element (60) from the tear panel (28) and their configurations. When the cap element (60) is replaced on the spout (40), reseal surfaces (46, 76) engage.
Description




TECHNICAL FIELD




This invention pertains to the field of easy-open devices for beverage cans. These devices, when actuated by the consumer, provide an opening through the can end or lid for pouring and drinking.




BACKGROUND ART




Approximately 100 billion thin-walled metal beverage cans are sold annually in the United States alone. Nearly all of these beverage cans have a stay-on-tab type closure according to my U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,967,752 and 3,967,753, which issued on Jul. 6, 1976. These closures are part of a can end or lid which is double seamed to the can body in a conventional manner with conventional equipment in a beverage filling line.




The stay-on-tab end has a number of attributes which have enabled it to remain the industry standard for over 20 years. These attributes include (a) the ability to be manufactured by commercially available machines; (b) low material and manufacturing costs; (c) low rates of defective ends produced by the end manufacturing lines; (d) nestability for ease and economy in handling the shells (blanks) and ends in the manufacturing lines, shipping them, and handling them in the beverage filling lines; (e) ease and speed of filling the can with the beverage and then seaming the end onto the can, again at low cost; (f) reliable containment and protection of the beverage during shipping, distribution, display, and handling and use by the consumer, with respect to carbonated as well as non-carbonated contents; (g) ease of opening by consumers of widely varying finger sizes, strengths, and dexterity; (h) consumer safety; (i) reliability of opening by consumers; (j) pourability; (k) drinkability; and (l) recyclability, in terms of both the value of its constituent material and the cost of recovering it.




The attribute most lacking in stay-on-tab ends is resealability.




Numerous attempts have been made to provide resealable threaded closures for beverage cans. Some of these merely sought to replicate, in the metal can and end, the structure of the neck and closure of a bottle neck and cap. Others employed more ingenious, and sometimes complex, solutions. Examples of such solutions and concepts used for other containers may be found in Henderson U.S. Pat. No. 2,771,218, Meissner U.S. Pat. No. 3,339,812, Salamone U.S. Pat. No. 3,401,819, Dubreul U.S. Pat. No. 5,292,025, and French patent 1,048,219.




Such solutions, including the simple as well as the complex, have not been commercially successful for at least two reasons. First, they have failed to match one or more of the attributes of the stay-on-tab closures listed above. Low cost is probably the criterion which is most frequently not satisfied. It is safe to say that if cost were no object, all of the remaining criteria could be satisfied. Second, these solutions have failed to equal or surpass conventional PET bottles and caps, which, though not possessing all the attributes of a can with a stay-on-tab closure, possess many of them and nevertheless have resulted in an excellent package for beverages.




DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION




The object of the present invention is to provide an easy-open closure for thin-walled metal beverage cans which has the attribute of resealability, as well as attributes of stay-on-tab ends to a degree which is consistent with the commercial needs of the beverage industry.




The present invention provides an assembly for closing and sealing a thin-walled metal can containing a beverage. The assembly may be quickly and easily opened by the consumer, provides a spout for pouring and drinking the beverage, and is conveniently resealable by the consumer. The assembly consists of three parts—a metal end and two threaded closure elements.




The end, which has been cut and formed from sheet metal, has a weakened line, for example a score line. The weakened line defines a hinge and a tear panel which can be pivoted downward about the hinge.




One threaded element is a stationary spout element which is attached to the end so as to surround the tear panel. The other threaded element is a rotatable cap element which has a bottom bearing surface immediately above and aligned with the periphery of the tear panel. Sealing surfaces on the respective closure elements face each other and are designed to engage each other for resealing, but are spaced apart initially.




When the consumer rotates the cap element clockwise, it is driven downward by the threads so that its bottom bearing surface ruptures the weakened line at a location distant from the hinge. Continued rotation causes the rupture to propagate along and around the weakened line in two directions toward the hinge. As this is occurring the cap element's bottom bearing surface is also forcing the tear panel to pivot downward about the hinge, until eventually the tear panel has been swung down and out of the way of the opening it has left.




The consumer rotates the cap element in the counter-clockwise direction to remove it from the spout element in the usual manner, and pours or drinks the beverage through the opening in the end and the spout. The consumer may reseal the closure by replacing it on the spout element and rotating it clockwise in the usual manner, past the position which pivoted the tear panel down, until the reseal surfaces engage and form a pressure seal.




Preferably the spout element has internal threads, the cap element has external threads, and the cap element has a skirt which surrounds the spout. The skirt may have knurled gripping surfaces and a tamper-evidencing feature. The spout element and the cap element may be molded from thermoplastic materials of different hardnesses.




To provide for an easy and reliable initial rupture, the tear panel may have configured into it a reinforcing structure to increase its rigidity at the place where the initial rupture is to occur and to concentrate the rupturing forces there. To provide for gradual, controlled, and reliable propagations of the rupture, the initial distance between the bottom bearing surface of the cap element and the surface of the periphery of the tear panel directly below it should vary inversely as a function of distance from the hinge.




The stationary and rotatable closure elements may be attached to the end either before or after the end is seamed onto the can in a beverage filling line. Attaching them in a separate operation after seaming permits the use of conventional equipment in the filling line, as well as in the end manufacturing plant.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

is a partial, fragmentary plan view of an end and closure according to the invention, with the central portion of the closure broken away to expose the end.





FIG. 2

is a view of a section taken at


2





2


in FIG.


1


.





FIG. 3

is a view similar to

FIG. 2

, showing a variation of the invention in which the tear panel is formed by severing, coining, and a sealant, rather than by scoring.





FIG. 4

is a view similar to

FIG. 2

, showing a variation of the invention in which the closure locks over the double seam.





FIG. 5

is a fragmentary plan view of an end according to a variation of the invention in which the tear panel is continuously inclined.





FIG. 6

is an extended view of a section taken at


6





6


in FIG.


5


.





FIG. 7

is a view of a section taken at


7





7


in FIG.


5


.





FIG. 8

is an enlarged view of a portion of FIG.


6


.





FIG. 9

shows a process for producing a consumer product from its component elements.





FIG. 10

shows a variation of the process shown in FIG.


9


.











BEST MODES FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION




Directional terms used in this application assume an orientation wherein the closure is secured to a can end which in turn is secured to a can standing upright, with a longitudinal axis extending vertically through their centers. This axis is the reference for “radius”, “circumference”, “inward”, “outward”, “upper”, “lower”, and cognate terms. Of course, the cans, ends, and other components may be otherwise oriented when they are manufactured, assembled, handled, shipped, sold, or used. The term “beverage” is used to mean any liquid food product, carbonated or non-carbonated, including beer, soft drinks, and juices. The term “lid” and can “end” will be used synonymously, with the former being preferred in the claims to avoid unintended locational connotations and the latter being preferred in the specification because it is standard industry terminology.




As shown in

FIGS. 1 and 2

, conventional can body


10


is attached and sealed to lid or end


12


by conventional double seam


14


. End


12


has conventional countersink


16


, domed panel


18


, and concave recess or well


20


. Well


20


is defined by lip


22


, cylindrical wall


24


, conical wall


26


, and generally horizontal center panel


28


. On center panel


28


are weakened line


30


, hinge


32


, tear panel


34


, and upwardly projecting fracture or rupture beads


36


. Weakened line


30


is preferably a score line, which may have a residual thickness which varies inversely with distance from hinge


32


. The rupture bead


36


shown in

FIG. 1

is one of five; the others are spaced counterclockwise around the periphery of the tear panel at 45° intervals. The height of each rupture bead is greater than the heights of all rupture beads closer to the hinge. As will be described below, the function of the rupture bead


36


shown in

FIG. 1

, which is opposite hinge


32


, is to promote the initial rupture of score line


30


there, while the function of the remaining rupture beads is to propagate the rupture along the score line toward hinge


32


.




Attached to end


12


is closure


39


, which comprises two elements—stationary closure element or spout


40


and rotatable closure element or cap


60


.




Spout


40


comprises cylindrical wall


42


, boss


48


, and flange


52


. Cylindrical wall


42


has clockwise internal threads


44


, upwardly facing circular reseal surface


46


, and conventional external venting grooves (not shown) cut vertically in the threads. Boss


48


, which has a conical portion


50


, is separated from flange


52


by circular groove


56


. Flange


52


has conical top surface


54


.




Cap


60


comprises top wall


62


, cylindrical inner wall


64


, cylindrical outer wall


68


, and downwardly facing circular reseal surface


76


between the walls. Inner wall


64


has clockwise external threads


66


and bottom bearing surface


67


including a horizontal portion and a conical portion. Outer wall


68


has annular knurled surface


70


and skirt


72


with vertical weakening grooves


74


spaced around it at 15° intervals.




Spout


40


is attached to end


12


by the locking of lip


22


in groove


56


. The attachment may be effected by relative movement of boss


48


into well


20


, with its conical portion


50


centering it, until lip


22


snaps into groove


56


. In addition, end


12


and spout


40


may be bonded together by adhesive


78


on their mating surfaces. The bonding is effected, for example, by applying liquid or viscous adhesive to one or both of them before attachment, by heating or irradiating a solid heat-sensitive or UV-cured coating so applied, or by spin-welding by rotating spout


40


and end


12


with respect to each other under pressure, with a pre-applied solid heat-sensitive coating between them. Spout


40


reinforces and strengthens end


12


. This is advantageous because it allows end


12


to be made of less metal, due to either a thickness reduction or due to a relatively gentle curvature of domed panel


18


(rather than a relatively tortuous profile for the purpose of increasing strength).




When provided to the consumer, can


10


is filled with beverage, and spout


40


and cap


60


are disposed as shown in FIG.


2


. Bearing surface


67


is above tear panel


34


by a distance of h


1


. Opposed reseal surfaces


46


,


76


are spaced apart by a distance of h


2


, which is greater than h


1


.




To open the can and-access its contents, the consumer grips knurled surface


70


and rotates cap


60


in the clockwise direction, thereby moving cap


60


downward relative to spout


40


and tear panel


34


. When cap


60


has moved a distance of approximately h


1


, bearing surface


67


contacts the rupture bead


36


which is 180° from hinge


32


, so as to concentrate the downward force of cap


60


on it and then to an adjacent point on score line


30


, where shearing forces cause an initial rupture of score line


30


. If can


10


contains pressure, the pressure is released to the interior of cap


60


and then passes through the venting grooves to the atmosphere. Simultaneously or just prior to the initial rupture, the bottom of skirt


72


is forced down against conical top surface of flange


52


, which splays skirt


72


radially outward and fractures it at one or more grooves


74


, so as to provide evidence of tampering. Continued rotation and downward movement of cap


60


cause bearing surface


67


to contact the next two rupture beads


36


, which are 135° and 225° from hinge


32


, and then to the 90° and 270° beads, thereby propagating the rupture of score line


30


toward hinge


32


in both directions from the 180° bead


36


. Similarly, further rotation of cap


60


propagates the rupture to hinge


32


by exerting a shearing force on score line


30


and swings tear panel


34


about hinge


32


and downward into the can. Tear panel


34


will be in approximately a vertical attitude when continued rotation of cap


60


brings it to its downmost position.




At this point the consumer has the ability to unscrew and remove cap


60


by rotating it counterclockwise, and to pour the beverage into a glass or drink it directly from spout


40


. As a practical matter, however, the consumer will continue clockwise rotation of cap


60


until surfaces


46


,


76


come together, which stops the downward movement of cap


60


at downmost position


67




a


. At this point cap


60


has rotated a total of about 360° and moved downward a total distance of approximately h


2


, and surfaces


46


,


76


provide a pressure seal. The consumer will then unscrew cap


60


and pour or drink a portion of the beverage, after which he or she may replace the cap and rotate it clockwise again to reseal the container at surfaces


46


,


76


.




The position of threads


44


,


66


(i.e., internal threads on the spout element and external threads on the rotatable element) is advantageous because threads


66


are relatively close to bearing surface


67


, which prevents or minimizes flexing of the spout or cap from diminishing the shearing force on score line


30


. This allows cylindrical walls


42


,


64


, and top wall


62


to be relatively thin. In contrast, see Meissner U.S. Pat. No. 3,339,812, which discloses a 2-piece closure having external threads on the stationary element and internal threads on the rotatable element. In addition, internal threads


44


on spout element


40


are not noticeable to the consumer during drinking from the can, and positioning threads


66


close to bearing surface


67


enables bearing surface


67


to be more precisely located with respect to score line


30


.





FIG. 3

shows a variation in which the weakened line which defines tear panel


134


is not a score line, but rather a line created by an operation in which the tear panel is severed and coined or impacted at


137


so that the increase of its area enables it to extend under the remainder of center panel, and a sealant


138


(for example, a plastisol) seals the overlap and the exposed metal edge.




In the variation shown in

FIG. 4

, end


212


is generally flat, without a dome or well, and has a smaller diameter than conventional ends, which are currently sizes 200 to 206 for beverages; I prefer size 109 or less. Flange


252


of stationary closure element or spout


240


is supported by end


212


, extends radially outward beyond the edge of end


212


, and terminates in skirt


223


with inturned annular bead


225


which locks under double seam


14


. Spout


240


may be bonded to end


212


by adhesive


278


. Venting holes


265


extend through inner wall


264


of cap


260


.





FIGS. 5-8

show end


312


with raised panel


318


having side wall


319


. Score line


330


defines hinge


332


and tear panel


334


, which is continuously inclined from a maximum height near its left hand edge to a maximum depth near its right hand edge, as shown in FIG.


6


. The spout and the cap are not shown. The spout, which is similar to spout


240


shown in

FIG. 4

except for the shape of its base, is also bonded to the end by an adhesive. The cap is similar to cap


260


shown in FIG.


4


.




Downwardly projecting strengthening bead


336


extends between the center of tear panel


334


and point


338


on score line


330


, terminating as close as possible to point


338


. The bottom of reverse bead


336


is a horizontal straight line which intersects score line


330


. The purpose of reverse bead


336


is to promote initial rupture by concentrating maximum force at a single place on score line


330


(point


338


) and increasing in that vicinity the resistance of tear panel


334


to deformation under the downward force exerted by the cap's bottom bearing surface


67


on the two high surfaces straddling bead


336


.




The score line residual thickness (for example


340


as depicted in

FIG. 8

) may be less at the point of initial rupture than at other locations on the score line, in order to promote the initial rupture. The presently preferred score line residual depths are 0.003 inch at point


338


and to 15° in both circumferential directions therefrom, and 0.004 inch elsewhere. The score line shown in

FIG. 8

has a conventional cross-sectional configuration, but the configuration may be modified to decrease the distance of its centerline from wall


319


.





FIG. 9

shows the preferred process for producing, from the components described above and the beverage or other product to be contained by them, the packaged product for the consumer. A parenthetical “C” designates conventional operations, and a parenthetical “C′” designates operations which are essentially conventional with tooling and/or other minor equipment modifications. Because of the high speeds of current can and end manufacturing operations and beverage filling and seaming operations, and of the capital investments these operations require, it is highly desirable to use conventional operations as much as possible. By attaching the closure to the end at a separate station subsequent to filling and seaming, the present invention permits the use of conventional beverage filling and seaming operations, using standard equipment. Moreover, the end, though not completely conventional, is sufficiently close to a conventional end that it may be formed and handled in a conventional can end manufacturing plant, using mostly conventional equipment.





FIG. 10

is similar to

FIG. 9

, but shows an alternative process in which the closure is attached to the end before the end is seamed on the can. This process avoids the need for a separate attaching station subsequent to seaming, but requires a modified, and probably slower, seaming operation, and of course requires the closure to be attached to the end farther upstream. This alternative might be acceptable for an existing small scale, relatively slow filling and seaming operation.





FIGS. 1-8

are drawn to scale, for a size


202


can and end, except for sheet metal thicknesses. Typical dimensions in inches for the embodiment shown in

FIGS. 1 and 2

are as follows:




O.D. of double seam


14


—2.125




O.D. of cap outer wall


68


—1.225




I.D. of cap outer wall


68


—1.010




O.D. of spout wall


42


—1.000




I.D. of end cylindrical wall


24


—0.950




I.D. of spout wall


42


, not including threads—0.862




O.D. of cap inner wall


64


, including threads—0.852




I.D. of spout wall


42


at boss


48


—0.762




O.D. of cap inner wall


64


, not including threads—0.752




Diameter of score line


30


(center to center)—0.752




I.D. of cap inner wall


64


—0.625




Height of spout


40


—0.868




Height of cap


60


—0.793




Height of end


12


—0.288




h


1


—0.075




h


2


—0.110




Height of highest rupture bead


36


—0.020




Thickness of cap top wall


62


—0.081




Spout


40


and cap


60


should be made from a relatively hard plastic with good point strength and impact strength, such as a polycarbonate. Preferably spout


40


is softer than cap


60


, since spout


40


needs to be easy to install and to seal tightly with end


12


, while cap


60


needs to fracture at grooves


74


and easily rupture score line


30


.




Rupture beads


36


may be varied in number and/or angular distribution about tear panel


34


, and may be replaced wholly or partly by a continuous bead or a continuously inclined tear panel, which may be on either a depressed panel or a raised panel similar to the panel shown in FIG.


3


. As an alternative, it is possible to vary the depth of bearing surface


67


(for example, by making the plane of bearing surface


67


non-perpendicular to the axis of the can), but this is not preferred, since it would require a specific rotational orientation of closure


39


with respect to end


12


during assembly.




Threads


44


,


66


are preferably buttress threads with a horizontal top surface so as to maximize the ability of cap


60


to exert a downward force on the tear panel. The presently preferred thread pitch (the ratio of height to circumference) is about 0.08 to 0.09, which yields a good compromise between the mechanical advantage for opening the tear panel and the number of revolutions required to remove the rotatable element.




It will be understood that, while presently preferred embodiments of the invention have been illustrated and described, the invention is not limited thereto, but may be otherwise variously embodied within the scope of the following claims.



Claims
  • 1. An assembly for (i) closing and sealing a thin-walled metal can body containing a beverage, (ii) easily and quickly providing a passage suitable for pouring and drinking the beverage, and (iii) conveniently reclosing and resealing the can, which assembly comprises a sheet metal lid having (A) a periphery shaped for fastening to a rim surrounding the open end of the can body, and (B) a curved, rupturable, weakened line which (a) defines most of the periphery of a non-removable tear panel while leaving between the tear panel and the remainder of the lid an integral hinge, and (b) extends away from one end of the hinge, around a bight where it is distant from the hinge, and back to the other end of the hinge;a stationary closure element mounted on the lid so as to enclose the tear panel, which stationary closure element has an upwardly facing annular reseal surface and helical threads surrounding an axial pouring passage; a rotatable closure element having a downwardly facing annular reseal surface, helical threads, and a bottom bearing surface; the threads of the stationary element and rotatable element engaging so that rotation of the rotatable element in one direction drives the rotatable element downward toward the lid and rotation of the rotatable element in the opposite direction, if continued, results in disengagement of the threads and allows removal of the rotatable element from the stationary element; the bottom bearing surface of the stationary element being aligned with the periphery of the tear panel, whereby rotation of the rotatable element in said first direction, if continued, initially ruptures the weakened line at a predetermined place distant from the hinge, propagates the rupture in two directions toward the hinge, and eventually causes the tear panel to pivot downward about the hinge.
  • 2. The assembly according to claim 1 wherein initially, before the rotatable element is rotated, the respective reseal surfaces are so spaced from each other that rotation of the rotatable element in said one direction, beyond the position required to cause the tear panel to pivot downward, causes the reseal surfaces to engage and form a pressure seal.
  • 3. The assembly according to claim 1 wherein the threads of the stationary element are internal threads and the threads of the rotatable element are external threads near its bearing surface.
  • 4. The assembly according to claim 1 wherein the internal threads are located on a cylindrical wall of the stationary element and the external threads are located on a cylindrical wall of the rotatable element.
  • 5. The assembly according to claim 4 wherein the rotatable element has a top wall and a cylindrical skirt extending downward therefrom, so that the cylindrical wall of the stationary element is disposed between, and is concentric with, the cylindrical wall and the skirt of the rotatable element.
  • 6. The assembly according to claim 5 wherein at least an annular portion of the outer surface of the skirt is knurled.
  • 7. The assembly according to claim 5 wherein the stationary element has a flange extending outward and below the bottom of the skirt of the rotatable element, so that as the rotatable element is rotated in said first direction, but before the weakened line of the lid is ruptured, the bottom of the skirt deforms to provide permanent evidence of the rotation.
  • 8. The assembly according to claim 5 wherein vertical weakening grooves are spaced around the bottom of the skirt.
  • 9. The assembly according to claim 1 wherein the stationary element and the rotatable element are each made of a different plastic material, the material of the stationary element being softer than the material of the rotatable element, whereby the stationary element is easy to install and seals tightly with the lid, and the rotatable element has good point strength and impact strength for initially rupturing the weakened line and propagating the rupture.
  • 10. The assembly according to claim 1 wherein the weakened line is a score line.
  • 11. The assembly according to claim 10 wherein the score line residual thickness is less at said predetermined place of initial rupture than it is at locations elsewhere on the score line.
  • 12. The assembly according to claim 1 wherein the vertical distance between said bottom bearing surface and the periphery of the tear panel directly beneath it is a minimum at said predetermined place of initial rupture and varies as an inverse function of distance from the hinge, so that rotation of the rotatable element causes concentrated shearing forces to be applied at the points of incipient rupture as the rupture propagates gradually and controllably around the weakened line in two directions toward the hinge.
  • 13. The assembly according to claim 12 wherein said predetermined place of initial rupture is opposite the hinge.
  • 14. The assembly according to claim 12 wherein the variation in said vertical distance is determined by the configuration of the surface of the periphery of the tear panel.
  • 15. The assembly according to claim 12 wherein said tear panel periphery includes discrete beads.
  • 16. The assembly according to claim 12 wherein said tear panel periphery includes a continuously inclined surface.
  • 17. The assembly according to claim 12 wherein a reinforcing structure in the tear panel adjacent said predetermined place of initial rupture provides rigidity to the tear panel and concentrates, at said place, forces for causing initial rupture of the weakened line.
  • 18. The assembly according to claim 12 wherein approximately one revolution of the rotatable element causes initial rupture of the weakened line and propagation of the rupture to the hinge.
  • 19. The assembly according to claim 1 wherein the exterior configuration and dimensions of the lid are similar to those of stay-on-tab lids which are standard in the beverage industry, so that the lid, without the stationary element mounted on it, may be fastened to a can in a beverage filling line using conventional equipment.
  • 20. A method of canning a beverage in a beverage filling line, in a can with an assembly according to claim 1, which method comprises:providing the lid; providing the stationary closure element; providing a can body having a rim surrounding its open end; filling the can with a beverage; fastening the periphery of the lid to the rim of the can; mounting the stationary closure element on the lid so that the axial pouring passage is aligned with the tear panel.
Parent Case Info

This application is a 371 of PCT/US 981/17843 filed Aug. 28, 1998 which claims benefits of Ser. No. 60/057,387 filed Aug. 28, 1997.

PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind 102e Date 371c Date
PCT/US98/17843 WO 00 5/15/2000 5/15/2000
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO99/10242 3/4/1999 WO A
US Referenced Citations (4)
Number Name Date Kind
3339812 Meissner Sep 1967
4911323 Arfert et al. Mar 1990
5292025 Dubreul Mar 1994
5348182 Luch et al. Sep 1994
Foreign Referenced Citations (2)
Number Date Country
1442319 Sep 1966 FR
531817 Aug 1955 IT
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60/057387 Aug 1997 US