The present invention relates to a resealable container and lid assembly having a lip snap seal for storing and packaging moisture-sensitive items, including but not limited to edible breath-freshening strips, drug-delivery strips, diagnostic test strips, and effervescent tablets.
The present invention relates to a resealable container and lid assembly having a lip snap seal for storing and packaging moisture-sensitive items, including but not limited to edible breath-freshening strips, drug delivery strips, diagnostic test strips, and effervescent tablets.
The container assembly substantially prohibits the ingress of moisture into the container assembly through the lid when the container is sealed. In other words, it is substantially moisture-proof. In another aspect of the invention, the container assembly is provided with a desiccant or similar material, which reduces the moisture present within the container when it is sealed. That is, after the container has been sealed, the desiccant absorbs moisture present therein. Likewise, after the container has been opened and then resealed, the desiccant absorbs moisture that entered the cavity when the container was opened.
In one embodiment of the present invention, the assembly comprises a lid and container that may be attached by a hinge. The hinge has a recess. The recess forms two elements, the first element being attached to the lid portion and the second element being attached to the container portion. In still a further embodiment, the recess functions as a bending point during the opening and closing of the container assembly.
The container has a sidewall depending downwardly from a top container surface. A bottom container surface is joined to the sidewall. The top container surface is provided with an opening, permitting access to the interior of the container. The opening is bounded by a lip that depends upward from the top container surface. A rim is positioned on the outside of the upper end of the lip.
In one example, the lid portion of the assembly is attached to the container portion by a hinge. The lid portion has a base portion with an outer periphery that extends over the container portion. In one embodiment, a portion of the base portion serves as a tab for facilitating the opening and closing of the container assembly. In yet another embodiment, the base portion is provided with a skirt that depends downwardly from a central portion of the base portion. The skirt is positioned at a location on the base portion that allows the skirt to enter into a closing relationship with lip of the container portion, in which the skirt of the base portion fits over the periphery of the lip provided on the top container surface (or, as the case may be, the skirt fits within the periphery of the lip). The skirt of the base portion has an end distal to where the skirt joins the lid portion. At the distal end of the skirt, the skirt is provided with an inward extension, which extends around the interior periphery of the skirt. Similarly, the lip of the container portion is provided with an end distal to where the lip joins the container portion, and the distal end of the lip is provided with an outward facing extension, which extends around the periphery of the lip. In effect, the extension on the skirt and the extension on the lip face each other. In constructing this arrangement on the skirt and lip, the extensions will abut and interlock with each other when the lid is closed on the container portion. In this arrangement, the interlocking, abutting extensions will form at least a substantially moisture-tight sealing arrangement with each other.
In yet another embodiment, a lip seal member depends downwardly and extends around the lid portion. The lip seal member is positioned interior to the skirt, which also depends downwardly from the base portion. Further, the lip seal member is positioned to lie interior of the lip extending upward from the container portion. When the lid is in the closed position, the lip seal member abuts the interior side of the distal end of the lip. In this arrangement, the lip seal (1) provides a sealing position, in addition to the one between the skirt and the lip; and (2) applies pressure on the lip from the inside out, which in turn applies pressure on the skirt, thereby applying tightening the seal between the skirt and the lip.
In yet another embodiment, the lid and/or container contain a desiccant, in the shape of a disc (e.g. puck), sleeve, or other desired shapes.
In yet another embodiment, the assembly includes an elastomeric liner applied to selected regions of the assembly. For example, elastomeric liner may be positioned on the interior surface of the lid, between the skirt and where the lip seals are provided, it may line the lip seals as well.
In yet another embodiment, the skirt depending downward from the base portion has a distal end that is provided with an inward extension. The lip has an end distal to the location where the lip joins the container top surface, where the recess is positioned. The recess is adapted to receive the extension when the lid portion is closed upon the container portion.
In a further embodiment, the container assembly of the present invention is formed of a plastic material, by injection molding or other suitable molding techniques. For example, the assembly may be molded of polypropylene. The assembly comprises a base and an upper housing that can be molded separately, the base can be loaded with the item to be retained in the container, and then the base and upper housing can be snap-fit together employing a lip seal in order to provide moisture-tightness.
In one embodiment, the containers of the present invention have a relatively small height dimension, making them well adapted to fit in a handbag, purse, or pocket. Despite this small height dimension, the container is well suited to storing items such as candies, edible breath-freshening strips, and diagnostic test strips, such as those employed in testing blood glucose levels.
In yet another embodiment, the opening of the container is irregular in its shape, not having a uniform radius. In other words, it is not circular.
The present invention relates to a container and lid assembly for storing and packaging moisture-sensitive items, including but not limited to edible breath-freshening strips, drug-delivery strips, diagnostic test strips, and effervescent tablets, that substantially prohibits the ingress of moisture into the assembly through the lid when the container and lid are sealed.
In one embodiment, the assembly 10 is generally provided with a lid portion 12 and container portion 14 that are attached by a hinge 16. The hinge 16 has a recess 16′. The recess 16′ forms two elements, the first element being attached to the lid portion and the second element being attached to the container portion In still a further embodiment, the recess functions as a bending point during the opening and closing of the container assembly.
The container portion has a container base 13, and a sidewall 11 depending upwardly from the base 13. A top container surface 17 extends inward from the sidewalls. The top container surface 17 is provided with an opening 20, permitting access to the interior of the container. The opening 20 is bounded by a lip 22 that extends upward from the top container surface 17. Lip 22 extends around the periphery of the opening 20. The lip 22 has an end 21 distal to the location where the lip joins the container top surface, where an extension 23 is positioned and faces outward, relative to the opening 20. The extension 23 extends around the periphery of the lip distal end 21.
The lid portion 12 has a base portion 24 with an outer periphery 25 that extends over at least a portion of the container portion. In one embodiment, a portion of the base portion 24 serves as a tab 13 for facilitating the opening and closing of the container assembly. The base portion 24 is provided with a skirt 26 that depends downwardly the base portion. The skirt 26 is positioned at a location on the base portion 24 that allows the skirt 26 to enter into a closing relationship with lip 22 of the container portion 14, in which the skirt 26 of the base portion 24 fits over the periphery of the lip 22 provided on the top container surface (or, as the case may be, the skirt fits within the periphery of the lip). The skirt 26 of the base portion 24 has an end 27 distal to the end at which the skirt joins the lid portion. At the distal end 27 of the skirt, the skirt is provided with an inward extension 28, which extends around the interior periphery of the skirt. At the distal end 27 of the skirt, the skirt is provided with an inward facing extension 28, which extends around the periphery of the skirt distal end 27. When the lid portion is closed on the container portion, the extension 28 on the skirt 26 and the extension 23 on the lip 22 face each other. Further, when the lid portion is closed on the container portion, the extensions will abut and interlock with each other. In this arrangement, the interlocking, abutting extensions will form a moisture-tight seal with each other.
In yet another embodiment, a lip seal member 30 depends downwardly and extends around the inside of the lid portion 12. The lip seal member 30 is positioned interior to the skirt 26 which also depending downwardly from the base portion 24. Further, the lip seal member 30 is positioned to lie interior of the lip 22 that extends upward from the container portion 14, and abut the interior side of the distal end of the lip 22, when the lid is in the closed position. In this arrangement, as shown in
In yet another embodiment, shown in
In yet another embodiment, the lid and/or container contain a desiccant, in the shape of a disc (e.g. puck), sleeve, or other shapes. In one embodiment, a desiccant entrained plastic is located in a desiccant liner that covers at least a portion of the lid and/or container, such as the desiccant-entrained plastic sleeve 34 positioned at the bottom of the container. See
The desiccant-entrained plastic contains a desiccant such as silica gel or molecular sieve as the desiccant. Depending on the application, such as the application intended by the end user, molecular sieve or silica gel desiccant can be provided in the sleeve. For example, molecular sieve can be used for applications that require a low RH (e.g. less than <10% RH) maintained over the shelf life. In another example, silica gel can maintain a RH of 10-30% over a two-year shelf life.
Suitable desiccant entrained plastic include, but are not limited to, these desiccant plastics disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,911,937, 6,214,255, 6,130,263, 6,080,350 and 6,174,952, 6,124,006, and 6,221,446. These references are incorporated herein by reference. By varying the desiccant loading and channeling agent in the plastic formulation, the overall moisture capacity and uptake rate of the desiccant entrained plastic can be controlled. In embodiments where containers include desiccant material, they may be formed by two shot molding techniques.
In yet another embodiment, the assembly includes an elastomeric liner 36 applied to selected regions of the assembly. For example, elastomeric liner may be positioned on the interior surface of the lid portion, lying inside the skirt. Where the lip seals are provided, it may line them as well. In one example, a suitable elastomer is EPDM, commercially available under the trade name Santoprene.
The containers of the present invention are formed of plastic materials, by injection molding or other suitable molding techniques. For example, the containers may be molded of polypropylene. In one embodiment, the containers can be formed as a single closed unit, with the hinge joining the lid portion to the container portion.
In yet another embodiment, the container assembly comprising the base and upper housing portion can be molded separately. As such, in one example, the base portion can be loaded with the item(s) to be retained in the container assembly, and then the upper housing portion can be snap-fit with the base by employing a lip seal mechanism in order to provide moisture-tightness. Consequently, the container and lid assembly can be fit together, and the parts joined without the need for additional sealing methods, e.g., by welding (such as by sonic welding or by thermal welding).
In a further embodiment of the lip seal mechanism, lip seal mechanism is designed to be sufficiently deflective so as to assist in the formation of a seal. As examples, the design of degree of deflection of the flexible lip can include, but is not limited to, the composition of the flexible lip (e.g. type of plastic), the thickness of the flexible lip, the curvature of the flexible lip, the length of the flexible lip and/or any attachments to the flexible lip.
In a further embodiment, the lid and container can be formed in a single piece (for example, joined at the hinge), yet open, as in a clamshell arrangement. The assembly can be filled with contents, closed shut, and then joined, e.g., welded to form a seal, as described above.
An embodiment depicting a two-part assembly is illustrated in
At the end of the lid portion 104 that is opposite the hinge, lid latch component 105, depending from the lid base 92, is located. In one embodiment, hooks 107 are provided on the lid latch. 105. In another embodiment, a tab 116, to facilitate opening of the lid portion, when it is closed on the opening 112, is provided on the lid portion.
Upper component 108 has top wall 109 from which sidewalls 110 and sloped wall 115 depend downward. Opening 112 is provided in the top wall 109. In the embodiment relating to hooks, hooks configured to mate with and compliment the hooks 107 on the lid portion 104 are positioned at one end of the upper component 108. At the end opposite where the hooks are positioned, hinge 106 is joined to the upper component 108. The upper component may have a recess 111 for the hinge 106, positioned between elevated portions 109′ of top wall 109.
The tray component 120 is provided with sidewalls 124 and sloped wall 126 depending upward from the base of the tray 122. Sloped wall 126 is complimentary in its shape to the sloped wall 115 of the upper component 108. The side walls define a cavity 128 where items can be stored.
As best seen in
Again, seen in
In the closed position (
The cover component 102 is adapted to fit over the tray component 120, in order to form a container assembly. The cover component and the tray component can be loaded with items to be dispensed through the opening and then joined together, in the ways previously described herein.
As seen in
A desiccant material, such as a desiccant sleeve, can be positioned in the container. As shown in
At least some or all of the embodiments of the present invention can be molded according to techniques disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. Re 37,676 (a reissue of U.S. Pat. No. 5,723,085), U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,812,116, and 4,783,056, all of which are incorporated herein by reference.
In another embodiment, the present invention relates to moisture-tight and resealable container and lid assembly. The term “resealable” means that the lid of the container can be opened/reopened and closed/reclosed a numerous amount of times (e.g. more than 10 times) and still retain its moisture-tight properties. As used herein, the terms “moisture-tight” and “moisture-sensitive” mean the moisture ingress of the container (after three days) was less than about 1500 micrograms of water, in another embodiment, about 500 micrograms of water, in a further embodiment, about 300 micrograms of water, in yet another embodiment, about 150 micrograms of water determined by the following test method: (a) place one gram plus or minus 0.25 grams of molecular sieve in the container and record the weight; (b) fully close the container; (c) place the closed container in an environmental chamber at conditions of 80% relative humidity and 72 F; (c) after one day, weigh the container containing the molecular sieve;
(d) after four days, weigh the container containing the molecular sieve; and (e) subtract the first day sample from the fourth day sample to calculate the moisture ingress of the container in units of micrograms of water.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/425,590, filed Apr. 17, 2009, abandoned, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/171,171, filed Jun. 30, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,537,137, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/683,311, filed Oct. 10, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,213,720, which claims a benefit under 35U.S.C. 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/417,533, filed Oct. 10, 2002, all of which are hereby incorporated by reference herein in their entirety for all purposes.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2003355 | Farkas | Jun 1935 | A |
2175673 | Shields | Oct 1939 | A |
2258540 | Cressaty | Oct 1941 | A |
2690861 | Tupper | Oct 1954 | A |
2814404 | Towns | Nov 1957 | A |
3227332 | Gowdy et al. | Jan 1966 | A |
3255907 | Eddy | Jun 1966 | A |
3272368 | Van Baarn | Sep 1966 | A |
3441161 | Van Vaarn | Apr 1969 | A |
3784055 | Anderson | Jan 1974 | A |
3848780 | Stull | Nov 1974 | A |
3899097 | Aichinger | Aug 1975 | A |
3967756 | Barish | Jul 1976 | A |
3986479 | Bonk | Oct 1976 | A |
3994417 | Boedecker | Nov 1976 | A |
4036360 | Deffeyes | Jul 1977 | A |
4043475 | Wheeler | Aug 1977 | A |
4281778 | Stull | Aug 1981 | A |
4380304 | Anderson | Apr 1983 | A |
4730731 | Allison | Mar 1988 | A |
4746008 | Heverly et al. | May 1988 | A |
4759463 | Mazoin | Jul 1988 | A |
4778071 | Fillmore | Oct 1988 | A |
4783056 | Abrams | Nov 1988 | A |
4807425 | Abrams | Feb 1989 | A |
4812116 | Abrams | Mar 1989 | A |
4869387 | Perrson | Sep 1989 | A |
4883056 | Langham | Nov 1989 | A |
4890742 | Allison | Jan 1990 | A |
4964539 | Mueller | Oct 1990 | A |
5033635 | Batchelor | Jul 1991 | A |
5108029 | Abrams et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5114003 | Jackish et al. | May 1992 | A |
5133470 | Abrams et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5145646 | Tyranski | Sep 1992 | A |
5379897 | Muckenfuchs et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5437386 | Von Holdt | Aug 1995 | A |
5474177 | Abrams et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5542567 | Julius | Aug 1996 | A |
5553739 | Plum et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5667094 | Rapcahk et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5699912 | Ishikawa | Dec 1997 | A |
5723085 | Abrams | Mar 1998 | A |
5788064 | Sacherer | Aug 1998 | A |
5842486 | Davis et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5911937 | Hekal | Jun 1999 | A |
6080350 | Hekal | Jun 2000 | A |
6092690 | Bitowft | Jul 2000 | A |
6124006 | Hekal | Sep 2000 | A |
6130263 | Hekal | Oct 2000 | A |
6174952 | Hekal et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6214255 | Hekal | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6221446 | Hekal | Apr 2001 | B1 |
D443450 | Ruhotas | Jun 2001 | S |
6299033 | Verweyest | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6303064 | Abrams et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
RE37676 | Abrams | Apr 2002 | E |
6364101 | Schultz | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6394298 | Zaidman | May 2002 | B1 |
6412634 | Telesca et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6486261 | Wu et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6613405 | Hekal | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6769558 | Bucholtz | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6872358 | Hagen et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6951292 | Bando et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
7005459 | Hekal | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7213720 | Giraud | May 2007 | B2 |
7537137 | Giraud | May 2009 | B2 |
7753228 | Yuhara | Jul 2010 | B2 |
20020185404 | Donegan | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030173325 | Mavin | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040173612 | Giraud | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050258174 | Giraud | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060196524 | Yuhara | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070023317 | Brozell | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070090106 | Yuhara et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20090200326 | Giraud et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090236357 | Giraud et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2428862 | Nov 2004 | CA |
2428862 | Nov 2004 | CA |
19546684 | Jun 1997 | DE |
19546684 | Jun 1997 | DE |
29705720 | Jun 1997 | DE |
29705720 | Jun 1997 | DE |
0079816 | May 1983 | EP |
0079816 | May 1983 | EP |
0208413 | Jan 1987 | EP |
0208413 | Jan 1987 | EP |
0328809 | Aug 1989 | EP |
0328809 | Aug 1989 | EP |
0454967 | Nov 1991 | EP |
0454967 | Nov 1991 | EP |
0857665 | Aug 1998 | EP |
0916595 | May 1999 | EP |
1582476 | Oct 2005 | EP |
1595813 | Nov 2005 | EP |
2205348 | Dec 1988 | GB |
2205348 | Dec 1988 | GB |
07-017748 | Mar 1995 | JP |
08230920 | Sep 1996 | JP |
08230920 | Sep 1996 | JP |
08337260 | Dec 1996 | JP |
08337260 | Dec 1996 | JP |
0912064 | Jan 1997 | JP |
0912064 | Jan 1997 | JP |
2002154594 | Nov 2000 | JP |
2002154594 | May 2002 | JP |
2004-299753 | Oct 2004 | JP |
2006-502062 | Jan 2006 | JP |
10-2011-0002347 | Jan 2011 | KR |
9112181 | Aug 1991 | WO |
9408872 | Apr 1994 | WO |
9633108 | Oct 1996 | WO |
9633108 | Oct 1996 | WO |
0046118 | Aug 2000 | WO |
0046118 | Aug 2000 | WO |
0153058 | Jul 2001 | WO |
0153058 | Jul 2001 | WO |
0194240 | Dec 2001 | WO |
0194240 | Dec 2001 | WO |
2004026728 | Apr 2004 | WO |
2004033339 | Apr 2004 | WO |
2004033339 | Apr 2004 | WO |
2005074571 | Aug 2005 | WO |
2006045087 | Apr 2006 | WO |
2006045087 | Apr 2006 | WO |
2006137176 | Dec 2006 | WO |
2008122771 | Oct 2008 | WO |
2008122771 | Oct 2008 | WO |
2008146171 | Dec 2008 | WO |
2008153953 | Dec 2008 | WO |
2008153954 | Dec 2008 | WO |
2008146171 | Dec 2008 | WO |
2008153953 | Dec 2008 | WO |
2008153954 | Dec 2008 | WO |
2009125267 | Oct 2009 | WO |
2009125267 | Oct 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Amended and Unified Answer and Affirmative Defenses to 1 Complaint and Counterclaim against CSP Technologies, Inc., filed by Defendants Sud-Chemie AG, Sud-Chemie Inc. and Airsec S.A.S. (LBT) (Entered: Dec. 2, 2011). |
Answer to 62 Counterclaim, filed by CSP Technologies, Inc. (McAndrews, George) Modified on Dec. 22, 2011 (LBT). (Entered: 12/2112011). |
Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings for Failure to State a Claim Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(c) and Motion to Strike, filed by Plaintiff CSP Technologies, Inc. (Attachments: # I Text of Proposed Order)(McAndrews, George) Modified on Mar. 27, 2012 (LBT). (Entered: Mar. 26, 2012). |
Brief/Memorandum in Support re 75 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings for Failure to State a Claim Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(c) and Motion to Strike, filed by Plaintiff CSP Technologies, Inc. (McAndrews, George) Modified on Mar. 27, 2012 (LBT). (Entered: Mar. 26, 2012). |
Reply in Support of Motion re 70 Motion for Leave to File Second Amended and Unified Answer, Affirmative Defenses and Counterclaims, filed by Defendants Airsec S.A.S., Sud-Chemie AG, Sud-Chemie, Inc. (Attachments: Exhibits 1-13 (Carroll, Jan) (Entered: Apr. 23, 2012). |
Response in Opposition re 75 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings for Failure to State a Claim Pursuant to Fed R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) and Fed R. Civ. P. 12(c) and Motion to Strike Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings for Failure to State a Claim Pursuant to Fed R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) and Fed R. Civ. P. 12(c) and Motion to Strike , filed by Defendants Airsec S.A.S., Sud-Chemie AG, Sud-Chemie, Inc.. (Carroll, Jan) (Entered:Apr. 23, 2012). |
Joint Claim Construction Statement , filed by Plaintiff CSP Technologies, Inc.. (McAndrews, George) (Entered: Oct. 23, 2012). |
Joint Claim Construction Statement—Supplemental, filed by Plaintiff CSP Technologies, Inc.. (McAndrews, George) (Entered: 1110112012). |
Entry on CSP Technologies, Inc.'s Partial Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings—Defendants' inequitable conduct counterclaim, designated as Counterclaim IV in Defendants' Amended Counterclaim, must be dismissed. 75 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is Granted. See Entry for details. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on Nov. 2, 2012. (LBT) (Entered: Nov. 2, 2012). |
Affidavit in Support of Motion re 100 Initial Markman/Claim Construction Brief by CSP Technologies, Inc. Declaration of George P. McAndrews, filed by Plaintiff CSP Technologies, Inc.(Attachments: Exhibits 1-10) (McAndrews, George) (Entered: 11112/2012). |
Affidavit in Support of Motion re 100 Initial Markman/Claim Construction Brief by CSP Technologies, Inc. Declaration of Dr. Tim A. Osswald, filed by Plaintiff CSP Technologies, Inc.. (Attachments: # Exhibit A—Expert Report of Dr. Tim A. Osswald)(McAndrews, George) (Entered: Nov. 12, 2012). |
Motion for Summary Judgment (Partial) of Direct Infringement, filed by Plaintiff CSP Technologies, Inc.. (Attachments: # Text of Proposed Order)(McAndrews, George) (Entered: Nov. 12, 2012). |
Brief/Memorandum in Support re 103 Motion for Summary Judgment (Partial) of Direct Infringement , filed by Plaintiff CSP Technologies, Inc. (McAndrews, George) (Entered: 11112/2012). |
Affidavit in Support of Motion re 103 Motion for Summary Judgment (Partial) of Direct Infringement Declaration of George P. McAndrews, filed by Plaintiff CSP Technologies, Inc.. (Attachments: Exhibits 1-7) (McAndrews, George) (Entered: Nov. 12, 2012). |
Affidavit in Support of Motion re 1 03 Motion for Summary Judgment (Partial) of Direct Infringement Declaration of Dr. Tim A. Osswald, filed by Plaintiff CSP Technologies, Inc.. (Attachments: # Exhibit A—Expert Report of Dr. Tim A. Osswald)(McAndrews, George) (Entered: Nov. 12, 2012). |
Motion for Summary Judgment ofNoninfringement or Invalidity of the Patent-in-suit, filed by Defendants Airsec S.A.S., Sud-Chemie AG, Sud-Chemie, Inc.. (Fritsch, Paula) (Entered: Nov. 12, 2012). |
Brief/Memorandum in Support re 107 Motion for Summary Judgment of Noninfringement or Invalidity of the Patent-in-suit , filed by Defendants Airsec S.A.S., Sud-Chemie AG, Sud-Chemie, Inc.. (Attachments: Exhibits 1-20) (Fritsch, Paula) Modified on Nov. 13, 2012 to remove duplicate wording (LBT). (Entered: Nov. 12, 2012). |
Initial Markman/Claim Construction Brief by All Defendants. (Attachments: Exhibits 1-10)(Fritsch, Paula) (Entered: Nov. 12, 2012). |
Exhibit in Support of 112 Response in Opposition 103 Motion for Summary Judgment (Partial) of Direct Infringement , filed by Defendants Airsec S.A.S., Sud-Chemie AG, Sud-Chemie, Inc. (Exhibit 8a—REbuttal Expert Report of Neil Sheehan). (Attachments: Exhibits 8b-12) (Carroll, Jan) Modified on Dec. 14, 2012 LBT). (Entered: Dec. 13, 2012). |
Response in Opposition re 107 Motion for Summary Judgment of Noninfringement or Invalidity of the Patent-in suit, filed by Plaintiff CSP Technologies, Inc.. (McAndrews, George) (Entered: Dec. 13, 2012). |
Affidavit re 115 Response in Opposition to 107 Motion for Summary Judgment Declaration of George P. McAndrews by CSP Technologies, Inc. (Attachments: Exhibits 1-4)(McAndrews, George) Modified on Dec. 14, 2012 to create link to related document (LBT). (Entered: Dec. 13, 2012). |
Affidavit re 115 Response in Opposition to 107 Motion for Summary Judgment (Declaration of Dr. Tim A. Osswald) by CSP Technologies, Inc.. (Attachments: Exhibit A—Responsive Expert Report of Dr. Tim A. Osswald) (McAndrews, George) Modified on Dec. 14, 2012 to create link to related document (LBT). (Entered: Dec. 13, 2012). |
Response re 100 Claim Construction Brief, filed by Defendants Airsec S.A.S., Sud-Chemie AG, Sud-Chemie, Inc. (Attachments: Exhibits 11-12)(Fritsch, Paula) Modified on Dec. 14, 2012 to create link to related document (LBT). (Entered: Dec. 13, 2012). |
Reply in Support of Motion re 107 Motion for Summary Judgment of Noninfringement or Invalidity of the Patent-in-suit, filed by Defendants Airsec S.A.S., Sud-Chemie AG, Sud-Chemie, Inc.. (Attachments: Exhibits 21-24) (Fritsch, Paula) (Entered: Jan. 3, 2013). |
European Search Report for European Patent No. 10155973.0 dated Jul. 8, 2010. |
International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, in International application No. PCT/US2012/025813, dated Dec. 6, 2012. (8 pages). |
PCT Notification of Transmittal of International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, in International application No. PCT/EP2010/062357, dated Aug. 24, 2010. |
The Patent Office of the People's Republic of China, Notification of First Office Action, in application No. CN200780038497.4, dated Mar. 23, 2010. |
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, Office Action in Canadian Application No. 2662751, dated Mar. 24, 2011. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability corresponding to International Application No. PCT/US2007/077702, mailed Mar. 19, 2009. |
European Patent Office, Communication with extended European Search Report in International Application No. 11075189.8-1261/2386496, dated Dec. 22, 2011. |
Japanese Patent Office, Notice of Reason(s) for Rejection, in Japanese Patent Application No. 2009-527556, dated Aug. 7, 2012, with translation. |
Conclusions pour La Societe Airsec, Defenderesse, contre La societe CSP Technologies, Demanderesse, Tribunal de grande instance de Paris, 3e chamber, 1e section, Role No. 11/06900, Signifiees via e-barreau le Dec. 14, 2011 (Pleading on Behalf of Airsec, Defendant, Against CSP Technologies, Claimant, Tribunal de Grande Instance of Paris, 3rd Chamber, 1st Section, Docket No. 11/06900, Served via e-barreau on Dec. 14, 2011); 104 Pages. |
Judgement rendu le Feb. 28, 2013, Demanderesses Societe CSP Technologies, Inc., Defenderesse Societe Airse, SAS, Tribunal de grande instance de Paris, 3eme chambre, 1ere section, No. RG: 11/06900 (Judgement of Feb. 28, 2013, Claimants CSP Technologies, Inc., Defendant Airsec SAS, Paris District Court, 3rd Division, Section 1, Docket No. 11/06900); 60 pgs. |
Brief No. 2, Paris District Court, Parties: CSP Technologies, Inc., v. Airsec, Defendant, To Their Honors the President and Judges of the Paris District Court (3rd Division, Section 1) Docket No. 11/06900 filed and served Jan. 21, 2013; 307 pages. |
Conclusions pour La societe Airse, Defenderess, contre La societe CSP Technologies, Demanderesse, Tribunal de grande instance de Paris, 3e chambre, 1e section, Role No. 11/06900, Signifiees via e-barreau le Jan. 11, 2013 (Pleading on Behalf of Airsec, Defendant, Against CSP Technologies, Claimant, and Capital Europe, Voluntarily joining party, Tribunal de Grande Instance of Paris, 3rd Chamber, 1st Section, Docket No. 11/06900, Served via e-barreau on Jan. 11, 2013); 381 pages. |
Conclusions pour La Societe Airsec, Defenderesse, contre La societe CSP Technologies, Demanderesse, Tribunal de grande instance de Paris, 3e chamber 1e section, Role No. 11/06900, Signifiees via e-barreau le Dec. 14, 2011 (Pleading on Behalf of Airsec, Defendant, Against CSP Technologies, Claimant, Tribunal de Grande Instance of Paris, 3rd Chamber, 1st Section, Docket No. 11/06900, Served via e-barreau on Dec. 14, 2011); 104 Pages. |
Brief No. 1, Paris District Court, Parties, CSP Technologies, Inc., V Airsec, Defendant, To Their Honors the President and Judges of the Paris District Court (3rd Division, Section 1), Docket No. 11/06900 (General List), Hearing to close the procedural stage of proceedings on Jan. 22, 2012 at 3:30 p.m., Filed and Served on Nov. 15, 2012. |
Conclusions Aux Fins De Sursis a Statuer devant le Tribunal de grande instance de Paris, Pour La Societe CSP Technlogies, Inc., Demanderesse, Contre La Societe Airsec, Defenderesse, 3eme chambre, 1ere section, RG No. 11/06900, Audience due May 16, 2012 (Motion for a Stay of Proceedings Before the Court of First Instance of Paris, for CSP Technologies, Inc., Plaintiff Against Airsec, Defendant, 3rd chamber, 1st section, RG No. 11/06900, Hearing of May 16, 2012 (15 pages). |
Order No. 9: Initial Determination Granting Motion to Withdraw Complaint and Terminate Investigation, in the Matter of Certain Flip-Top Vials and Products Using the Same, United States International Trade Commission, Investigation No. 337-TA-779, Aug. 29, 2011, (5 pages). |
Order No. 8: Granting Unopposed Motion to Stay All Pending Deadlines, in the Matter of Certain Flip-Top Vials and Products Using the Same, United States International Trade Commission, Investigation No. 337-TA-779, Aug. 19, 2011, (3 pages). |
Order No. 5: Setting Target Date of Sep. 24, 2012 in the Matter of Certain Flip-Top Vials and Products Using the Same, United States International Trade Commission, Investigation No. 337-TA-779, Jul. 21, 2011, (2 pages). |
Order No. 4: Requesting Position of Parties on Target Date by Jul. 20, 2011 and Suspending Preliminary Conference, in the Matter of Certain Flip-Top Vials and Products Using the Same, United States International Trade Commission, Investigation No. 337-TA-779, Jul. 18, 2011, (2 pages). |
Order No. 1: Notice of Ground Rules, Setting Jul. 18, 2011 Date for Discovery Statements, and Jul. 28, 2011 Date for Preliminary Conference, in the Matter of Certain Flip-Top Vials and Products Using the Same, United States International Trade Commission, Investigation No. 337-TA-779, Jun. 17, 2011, (6 pages). |
Response and Affirmative Defenses of Sud-Chemie AG, Sud-Chemie, Inc., and Airsec S.A.S. To Complaint and Notice of Investigation, in the Matter of Certain Flip-Top Vials and Products Using the Same, United States International Trade Commission, Investigation No. 337-TA-779, Jul. 11, 2011, (51 pages). |
Sud-Chemie AG's, Sud-Chemie Inc.'s, and Airsec S.A.S's First Set of Interrogatories Nos. 1-44 to Complaintant CSP Technologies, Inc., in the Matter of Certain Flip-Top Vials and Products Using the Same, United States International Trade Commission, Investigation No. 337-TA-779, Jun. 30, 2011, (26 pages). |
Sud-Chemie AG's, Sud-Chemie Inc.'s, and Airsec S.A.S's First Set of Requests for Production of Documents and Things Nos. 1-106 To Complaintant CSP Technologies Inc., in the Matter of Certain Flip-Top Vials and Products Using the Same, United States International Trade Commission, Investigation No. 337-TA-779, Jun. 30, 2011, (28 pages). |
Complainant CSP Technologies, Inc.'s First Set of Interrogatories to Respondents Sud-Chemie AG, Sud-Chemie, Inc. and Airsec S.A.S., in the Matter of Certain Flip-Top Vials and Products Using the Same, United States International Trade Commission, Investigation No. 337-TA-779, Jun. 30, 2011, (28 pages). |
Complainant CSP Technologies, Inc.'s First Set of Requests for Production of Documents and Things to Respondents Sud-Chemie AG, Sud-Chemie, Inc.and Airsec S.A.S., in the Matter of Certain Flip-Top Vials and Products Using the Same, United States International Trade Commission, Investigation No. 337-TA-779, Jun. 30, 2011, (32 pages). |
Complaint of CSP Technologies, Inc. Under Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, As Amended, in the Matter of Certain Flip-Top Vials and Products Using the Same, Public Version, United States International Trade Commission, May 16, 2011, (33 pages). |
Plaintiff CSP Technologies, Inc.'s Reply in Support of Its Motion for Partial Summary Judgement of Direct Infingement, in the Matter of CSP Technologies, Inc., Plaintff, v. Sud-Chemie AG, Sud-Chemie, Inc. and Airsec S.A.S, Defendants, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana New Albany Division, Civil Action No. 4:11-cv-00029-RLY-WGH, Jan. 3, 2013, (23 pages). |
Plaintiff CSP Technologies, Inc.'s Responsive Markman Brief, in the Matter of CSP Technologies, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Sud-Chemie AG, Sud-Chemie, Inc. and Airsec S.A.S, Defendants, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana New Albany Division, Civil Action No. 4:11-cv-00029-RLY-WGH, Dec. 13, 2012, (23 pages). |
Plaintiff CSP Technologies, Inc.'s Opening Markman Brief, in the Matter of CSP Technologies, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Sud-Chemie AG Sud-Chemie Inc. and AIRSEC S.A.S, Defendants, In the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana New Albany Division, Civil Action No. 4:11-cv-00029-RLY-WGH, Nov. 11, 2012, (29 pages). |
Responsive Expert Report of Dr. Tim A. Osswald, in the Matter of CSP Technologies, Inc., Plaintff, v. Sud-Chemie AG, Sud-Chemie Inc. and Airsec S.A.S, Defendants, In the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana New Albany Division, Civil Action No. 4:11-cv-00029-RLY-WGH, Oct. 12, 2012, (91 pages). |
Rebuttal Expert Report and Declaration of Neil Sheehan, Redacted Version, in the Matter of CSP Technologies, Inc., Plaintff, v. Sud-Chemie AG, Sud-Chemie Inc. and Airsec S.A.S, Defendants, In the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana New Albany Division, Civil Action No. 4:11-cv-00029-RLY-WGH, Oct. 12, 2012, (73 pages). |
Expert Report and Declaration of Neil Sheehan, Redacted Version, in the Matter of CSP Technologies, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Sud-Chemie AG, Sud-Chemie Inc. and Airsec S.A.S, Defendants, In the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana New Albany Division, Civil Action No. 4:11-cv-00029-RLY-WGH, Aug. 13, 2012, (310 pages). |
Sud-Chemie AG's, Sud-Chemie Inc.'s, and Airsec S.A.S's First Set of Requests for Production of Documents and Things Nos. 1-82 to Plaintiff CSP Technologies, Inc., in the Matter of CSP Technologies, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Sud-Chemie AG, Sud-Chemie, Inc. and Airsec S.A.S, Defendants, In the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana New Albany Division, Civil Action No. 4:11-cv-00029-RLY-WGH, Jul. 3, 2012, (30 pages). |
Sud-Chemie AG's, Sud-Chemie Inc.'s, and Airsec S.A.S's First Set of Interrogatories Nos. 1-14 to Plaintiff CSP Technologies Inc., in the Matter of CSP Technologies, Inc., Plaintff, v. Sud-Chemie AG, Sud-Chemie Inc. and Airsec S.A.S, Defendants, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana New Albany Division, Civil Action No. 4:11-cv-00029-RLY-WGH, Jul. 3, 2012, (14 pages). |
Plaintiff CSP Technologies, Inc.'s Reply in Support of Its Partial Motion for Judgement on the Pleadings for Failure to State a Claim Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(c) and Motion to Strike, in the Matter of CSP Technologies, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Sud-Chemie AG, Sud-Chemie, Inc. and Airsec S.A.S, Defendants, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana New Albany Division, Civil Action No. 4:11-cv-00029-RLY-WGH, May 10, 2012, (14 pages). |
Order on Defendant's Motion for Leave to File a Second Amended and United Answer, Affirmative Defenses, and Counterclaims, in the Matter of CSP Technologies, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Sud-Chemie AG, Sud-Chemie, Inc. and Airsec S.A.S, Defendants, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana New Albany Division, Civil Action No. 4:11-cv-00029-RLY-WGH, May 2, 2012, (7 pages). |
Plaintiff CSP Technologies, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendeant Sud-Chemie AG, Sud-Chemie, Inc. and Airsec S.A.S.'s Motion for Leave to File a Second Amended and Unified Answer, Affirmative Defenses, and CounterClaims, in the Matter of CSP Technologies, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Sud-Chemie AG, Sud-Chemie, Inc. and Airsec S.A.S, Defendants, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana New Albany Division, Civil Action No. 4:11-cv-00029-RLY-WGH, Mar. 19, 2012, (25 pages). |
Smith, John D., Sud-Chemie AG's, Sud-Chemie Inc.'s, and Airsec S.A.S.'s Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Mar. 30, 2012, pp. 1-31, Exhibits 20-21, 23-24, 27, 30-31, 33, C, D, F-L, Civ. Action 4:11-cv-00029-RLY-WGH, New Albany, IN. |
Order on Case Management Plan, in the Matter of CSP Technologies, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Sud-Chemie AG, Sud-Chemie, Inc. and Airsec S.A.S, Defendants, In the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana New Albany Division, Civil Action No. 4:11-cv-00029-RLY-WGH, Nov. 29, 2011, (3 pages). |
Defendants' Unopposed Motion to Stay, in the Matter of CSP Technologies, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Sud-Chemie AG, Sud-Chemie, Inc. and Airsec S.A.S, Defendants, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana New Albany Division, Civil Action No. 4:11-cv-00029-RLY-WGH, Jun. 23, 2011, (51 pages). |
Reply in Support of Notice of Related Case; in the Matter of CSP Technologies, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Sud-Chemie AG, Sud-Chemie, Inc. and Airsec S.A.S, Defendants, In the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana New Albany Division, Civil Action No. 4:11-cv-00029-RLY-WGH, Jun. 17, 2011, (22 pages). |
Declaration of George P. McAndrews in Support of Plaintiff CSP Technologies, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendant Sud-Chemin AG's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction, in the Matter of CSP Technologies, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Sud-Chemie AG, Sud-Chemie, Inc. and Airsec S.A.S, Defendants, In the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana New Albany Division, Civil Action No. 4:11-cv-00029-RLY-WGH, Jun. 15, 2011, (27 pages). |
Plaintiff CSP Technologies, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendant Sud-Chemie AG's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jursidiction, in the Matter of CSP Technologies, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Sud-Chemie AG, Sud-Chemie, Inc. and Airsec S.A.S, Defendants, In the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana New Albany Division, Civil Action No. 4:11-cv-00029-RLY-WGH, Jun. 15, 2011, (27 pages). |
Declaration of Robert S. Abrams in Support of Plaintiff CSP Technologies, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendant Sud-Chemie AG's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction, in the Matter of CSP Technologies, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Sud-Chemie AG, Sud-Chemie, Inc. and Airsec S.A.S, Defendants, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana New Albany Division, Civil Action No. 4:11-cv-00029-RLY-WGH, Jun. 15, 2011, (8 pages). |
Answer to Defendants and Counterclaim Plaintiffs Sud-Chemie, Inc.'s and Airsec S.A.S.'s Counterclaims, in the Matter of CSP Technologies, Inc., Paintff, v. Sud-Chemie AG, Sud-Chemie, Inc. and Airsec S.A.S, Defendants, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana New Albany Division, Civil Action No. 4:11-cv-00029-RLY-WGH, Jun. 15, 2011, (14 pages). |
Response to CSP Technologies, Inc.'s Notice of Related Case, in the Matter of CSP Technologies, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Sud-Chemie AG, Sud-Chemie, Inc. and Airsec S.A.S, Defendants, In the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana New Albany Division, Civil Action No. 4:11-cv-00029-RLY-WGH, May 26, 2011, (8 pages). |
Sud-Chemie AG's Memorandum in Support of Its Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction, in the Matter of CSP Technologies, Inc., Plantiff, v. Sud-Chemie AG, Sud-Chemie, Inc. and Airsec S.A.S, Defendants, In the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana New Albany Division, Civil Action No. 4:11-cv-00029-RLY-WGH, May 19, 2011, (11 pages). |
Sud-Chemie AG's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction, in the Matter of CSP Technologies, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Sud-Chemie AG, Sud-Chemie Inc. and Airsec S.A.S, Defendants, In the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana New Albany Division, Civil Action No. 4:11-cv-00029-RLY-WGH, May 19, 2011, (4 pages). |
Sud-Chemie Inc.'s and AIRSEC S.A.S.'s Answer, Affirmative Defenses and Counterclaims, in the Matter of CSP Technologies, Inc., Plantiff, v. Sud-Chemie AG, Sud-Chemie, Inc. and AIRSEC S.A.S, Defendants, In the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana New Albany Division, Civil Action No. 4:11-cv-00029-RLY-WGH, May 19, 2011, (29 pages). |
Declaration of Edgar Binnemann in Support of Defendant Sud-Chemie AG's Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(2), in the Matter of CSP Technologies, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Sud-Chemie AG, Sud-Chemie, Inc. and Airsec S.A.S, Defendants, In the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana New Albany Division, Civil Action No. 4:11-cv-00029-RLY-WGH, May 19, 2011, (5 pages). |
Summons in a Civil Action to Sud-Chemie, Inc., in the Matter of CSP Technologies, Inc., Paintiff, v. Sud-Chemie AG, Sud-Chemie, Inc. and Airsec S.A.S, Defendants, In the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana New Albany Division, Civil Action No. 4:11-cv-00029-RLY-WGH, Mar. 14, 2011, (3 pages). |
Summons in a Civil Action to Airsec S.A.S., in the Matter of CSP Technologies, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Sud-Chemie AG, Sud-Chemie, Inc. and Airsec S.A.S, Defendants, In the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana New Albany Division, Civil Action No. 4:11-cv-00029-RLY-WGH, Mar. 14, 2011, (3 pages). |
Summons in a Civil Action to Sud-Chemie AG, in the Matter of CSP Technologies, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Sud-Chemie AG, Sud-Chemie, Inc. and Airsec S.A.S, Defendants, In the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana New Albany Division, Civil Action No. 4:11-cv-00029-RLY-WGH, Mar. 14, 2011, (3 pages). |
Plaintiff CSP Technologies, Inc.'s Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement, in the Matter of CSP Technologies, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Sud-Chemie AG, Sud-Chemie, Inc. and Airsec S.A.S, Defendants, In the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana New Albany Division, Civil Action No. 4:11-cv-00029-RLY-WGH, Mar. 11, 2011, (2 pages). |
Civil Cover Sheet, in the Matter of CSP Technologies, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Sud-Chemie AG, Sud-Chemie, Inc. and Airsec S.A.S, Defendants, In the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana New Albany Division, Civil Action No. 4:11-cv-00029-RLY-WGH, Mar. 11, 2011, (3 pages). |
Complaint for Patent Infringement, in the Matter of CSP Technologies, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Sud-Chemie AG, Sud-Chemie, Inc. and Airsec S.A.S, Defendants, In the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana New Albany Division, Civil Action No. 4:11-cv-00029-RLY-WGH, Mar. 11, 2011, (34 pages). |
Rucknahme der Klage, in Sachen CSP Technologies, Inc. gegen Sud-Chemie AG, 7 O 5212/11, Landgericht Munchen I, 7.Zivilkammer, Lenbachplatz 7, 80316 Munchen, Munchen, Jul. 7, 2011 (Withdrawal of Complaint, In the matter of CSP Technologies, Inc. against Sud-Chemie AG, -7 O 5212/11-, Munich District Court I, Patent Dispute Division, Lenbachplatz 7, 80316 Munich, Munchen, Jul. 7, 2011); 2 pages. |
die Frist zur Stellungnahme auf den PKS-Antrag um 3 Wochen, d.h. bis zum 1. Jul. 2011 zu verlangern, Landgericht Munchen I, 7.Zivilkammer, Lenbachplatz 7, 80316 Munchen, Munchen, Jun. 10, 2011 (We first rais the objection that no security for the legal costs has been furnished, In the matter of CSP Technologies, Inc. versus Sud-Chemie AG, -7 O 5212/11-, Regional Court Munich I, 7th Civil Division, 80316 Munich, Munchen, Jul. 7, 2011); 69 pages. |
Klage, der CSP Technologies, Inc., -Klagerin-gegen die Sud-Chemie AG, -Beklagte-, Landgericht Munchen I, 7.Zivilkammer, Lenbachplatz 7, 80316 Munchen, Munchen, Mar. 14, 2011 (Action of CSP Technologies, Inc., -Plaintiff-, against Sud-Chemie AG, -Defendant-, Munich District Court I, Patent Dispute Division, Lenbachplatz 7, 80316 Munich, Munucg, Mar. 14, 2011); 70 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130098934 A1 | Apr 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60417533 | Oct 2002 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12425590 | Apr 2009 | US |
Child | 13533233 | US | |
Parent | 11171171 | Jun 2005 | US |
Child | 12425590 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10683311 | Oct 2003 | US |
Child | 11171171 | US |