This invention relates to on-line reservation systems and methods. It is particularly, but not exclusively, concerned with ticketing systems and methods for travel and events and also with reservation systems for hotels, venues and the like.
In recent years, social networking has become one of the biggest activities on the Internet. The most used social networking sites include Facebook (www.facebook.com) for personal networking and LinkedIn (www.linkedin.com) for professional networking. As these social media systems have developed, they have begun to integrate with service providers enabling users of social media sites to access third party goods and services from the social media sites.
Within the travel industry there has been some integration of travel related systems into social networking sites. One example in the airline industry is Delta Airlines which has a booking engine hosted in Facebook which can be accessed at http://www.facebook.com/delta?v=app 119581404755652. However, this booking engine does not integrate with the Facebook functionality and merely provides a window through which a user of the social networking site can access the booking system. EasyJet provides a similar link at http://www.facebook.com/easyjet?v=app 10442206389. This is merely a link that redirects to their web site www.easyjet.com.
Satisfly Limited (www.satisfly.orq) had proposed a service which aims to find compatible seat neighbours on airline flights.
Booking aggregation web sites such as Tripit (www.tripit.com) and Doppler (www.dopplr.com) enable users to publish details of travel plans to contacts on social networking sites once those plans have been made. A user of these systems would make their travel reservations independently of these sites but then publish details to their contacts once the reservations have been made.
We have appreciated that the amount of interaction between these existing systems and social networking sites is very limited and that the existing interaction does not utilise many of the attractive features of social networking web sites. The present invention aims to address that problem and to improve the interaction between reservation systems and social networking platforms such as web sites.
According to a first aspect of the invention there is provided a computerised on-line reservation method, comprising the steps of: receiving a reservation enquiry at a computerised booking system from a user; receiving the user's identification on a social networking platform at the computerised booking system; storing the social networking identification of the user in a database associated with the computerised booking system; in response to a subsequent user submitting a reservation enquiry; retrieving a list of social networking identifications (SNIDs) for that user from the social networking platform, the list comprising a group of one or more other parties registered on the social networking platform with whom the subsequent user is associated; searching, at the computerised booking system, for third party reservations having at least one overlapping reservation criterion and an associated SNID from the subsequent user's list; and displaying to the subsequent user the SNID of a third party identified by the search together with information regarding the reservation.
This aspect of the invention also provides a computerised on-line reservation system, comprising: a computerised booking system for receiving a reservation enquiry from a user, the computerised booking system being configured to receive the user's identification on a social networking platform at the computerised booking system; a store for storing the social networking identification of the user in a database associated with the computerised booking system; the computerised booking system further being configured to, in response to receiving a reservation enquiry from a subsequent user; retrieve a list of social networking identifications (SNIDs) for that user from the social networking platform, the list comprising a group of one or more other parties registered on the social networking platform with whom the subsequent user is associated; the system further comprising a search engine for searching, at the computerised booking system, for third party reservations having at least one overlapping reservation criterion and an associated SNID from the subsequent user's list; and the computerised booking system being configured to send to the subsequent user for display, the SNID of a third party identified by the search together with information regarding the reservation.
Embodiments of the invention have the advantage that functionality of the social networking platform can be accessed and taken advantage of to enhance the reservation process by bringing to the attention of the reserving party reservations made by friends or contacts with whom they are associated on the social networking platform and which have at least one overlapping reservation criteria.
A preferred embodiment of the invention comprises, on sending the subsequent enquiry, sending a request to the social networking platform to retrieve the city of residence of each party in the subsequent user's list of associated parties; comparing the residences of the list of associated parties with the chosen destination of the subsequent user; and displaying in the subsequent user's browser, an identification of any party from the list recorded by the social networking platform as resident in the subsequent user's destination city. This embodiment has the advantage of drawing the subsequent user's attention to friends or contacts with whom he is associated who are listed on the social networking platform as living in the destination to which the subsequent user is intending to travel, thus enabling the subsequent user to contact them before travelling.
Preferably, the overlapping criterion comprises destination and date. In one preferred embodiment, the reservation system is a travel reservation system and the overlapping criterion comprises the instance of travel being reserved by the subsequent user. Preferably the instance of travel is one of a flight, rail journey, road journey or water journey. This embodiment has the advantage that the subsequent user can see which of their associated friends or contacts are booked onto a flight, or other form of travel, that they are considering booking.
Preferably, the method further comprises, on receipt of a check-in request message received at the booking engine from the user's browser, retrieving the identifications of the user's friends or contacts lists on the social networking platform and comparing the identifications of the friends or contacts lists with other passengers checked in or scheduled to check-in to the same journey as said user; and on finding a matching social networking ID, causing the user's browser to display the matching ID. This embodiment of the invention has the advantage of drawing the user's attention to associated friends or contacts at the time of check-in
In one preferred embodiment, the reservation is a seat reservation and the third party's social networking ID is displayed together with the seat to which that ID has been allocated where the third party has checked in. In another preferred embodiment the reservation is a room accommodation and the third party's social networking ID is displayed together with the room to which that ID has been allocated if the third party has checked-in. These embodiments have the advantage of drawing the attention to the specific location of the third party if they have checked-in already.
In one preferred embodiment, the user's social networking ID is received from the user as part of the reservation request. Alternatively, the ID may be retrieved the database associated with the booking system or from an associated booking system. This has the advantage of making the system easy to operate and requires a user to enter their social networking ID once after which it is available over a plurality of different platforms.
A second aspect of the invention provides a computerised on-line check-in method for check-in into a previously made reservation, comprising the steps of: receiving a check-in request at a computerised booking system from a user computer via a browser; receiving the user's identification on a social networking platform at the computerised booking system; retrieving a list of social networking identifications (SNIDs) for that user from the social networking platform, the list comprising a group of one or more other parties registered on the social networking platform with whom the subsequent user is associated; searching, at the computerised booking system, for third party reservations having at least one overlapping criterion and an associated SNID from the subsequent user's list; and causing the user's browser to display the SNID of a third party identified by the search together with information regarding the reservation.
This aspect of the invention also provides a computerised on-line check-in system for check-in to a previously made reservation, comprising a computerised booking system configured to: receive a check-in request from a user; receive the user's identification on a social networking platform; retrieve a list of social networking identifications (SNIDs) for that user from the social networking platform, the list comprising a group of one or more other parties registered on the social networking platform with whom the subsequent user is associated; the system further comprising a search engine for searching for third party reservations having at least one overlapping criterion and an associated SNID from the subsequent user's list; the booking system further being configured to send to the user for display, the SNID of a third party identified by the search together with information regarding the reservation.
In one preferred embodiment the reservation is a reservation for travel and the user's browser is caused to display the associated SNIDs of parties making the same journey. The booking system may determine whether a third party identified by the search has check-in and, if it has, displays the seat number of the third party in the user's browser.
In another preferred embodiment the reservation is a reservation for accommodation and the user's browser is caused to display the associated SNIDs or parties having booked the accommodation for an overlapping period. The booking system may determine whether a third party identified by the search has checked-in, and if it has, display the room number of the third party in the user's browser.
In one embodiment, the social network platform is a web browser.
Embodiments of the invention will now be described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
The following embodiments will be described in the context of flight reservation and check-in. However, it is to be appreciated that the invention is not limited to flight check-in and reservation and applies to any other form of transportation, including but not limited to trains, ships and cars. It is also applicable to other, non-travel related reservation systems such as events, venues, concerts, theatre, stadia, sports grounds and hotel and motel accommodation. The invention is not limited to systems and methods which handle reservations which require check-in after the reservation has been made. The air travel embodiment is given as an example only and is not to be construed as limiting.
In this specification, the term booking refers to a confirmed order, whereas the term reservation covers not only confirmed orders (bookings) but also tentative or putative orders that have not yet been confirmed.
The following example uses Facebook (www.facebook.com) as an example of a social networking platform, in this case a web site. However, it is also to be understood that the invention is not limited to any particular social networking platform or site and may be used with any suitable site including, but not limited to, Facebook (www.facebook.com); Bebo (www.bebo.com); Linkedin (www.linkedin.com); Twitter (www.twitter.com) and Plaxo (www.plaxo.com). It may also be used with social networks which are not hosted on websites, for example enterprise solutions within large companies. The only requirement of such a site is that users have a list of Friends or contacts, being a group of other users of the website or other platform who have consented to be associated with the user.
Social networking sites operate by registering users and assigning each registered user an identification. In embodiments of the present invention, the social networking identification (ID) of a user making a booking is stored in the database 14 together with other particulars of the booking. These particulars include conventional reservation details such as city, date, class of travel, airline etc and will vary depending on the type of reservation made.
The social networking identification data may be captured from multiple sources including, but not limited to, a call centre booking engine, a mobile booking engine, and an Internet booking engine. When a customer interfaces with a booking system, either via the social networking web site of otherwise, they may be asked to input their social networking identification for future use. The booking system may be a single system into which reservations and bookings may be made from a number of different sources such as on-line, including via a social networking site, via a call centre booking engine and through other interfaces with the system. The social networking identification data may be stored in separate tables which may be accessed from any part of the system.
In
At some point after a booking has been made, a different user will access the booking engine via a social networking platform, in this example a web site. Rather than booking a specific flight, a user will typically make a search for flight availability to a particular destination on a particular day or around a particular date. The booking engine performs, in a known manner, an availability search for the airline against the airline reservation system 12, for example, a standard or other priced search, and returns data to the client browser 16 showing flight options and prices. This is a conventional step made as part of any online booking system. This step is shown by arrow 24 in
In this example the reservation and check-in are described as made via a browser, in this case a web browser. Although this is presently preferred, other options are possible, for example via a mobile phone or kiosk which may not be browser based but still able to access the social network site. In other embodiments the social network may resident within an organisation and accessed via an API.
The booking engine 10 then searches the database 14 for other bookings that have already been stored and seeks to retrieve bookings where there is an overlap in the stored destination and dates and the social networking ID of these overlapping bookings is on the list of IDs communicated from the user via their browser. This overlap may be either be to identify IDs of friends or contacts on the same flights as have been returned by the search, or who will be in the same destination for all or a part of the duration of the trip being booked. Alternatively, both types of overlap may be identified.
The social networking ID of the owner of the overlapping booking is then communicated to the user in their client browser together with other flight details. This process is illustrated by arrow 26 in
As these overlaps relate to users of the social networking site who are also user of the airline reservation system, their social networking Ids will already be stored in the reservation system which does not, therefore, need to communicate with the social networking site to perform the overlap search.
Optionally, in parallel, the client browser initiates a further asynchronous enquiry to the social networking system 18 to retrieve the cities in which the friends on the user's friends list are recorded as living. If there are any friends who live in the destination city of the user's booking, the information is displayed alongside the flight options and prices. As this data includes friends or contacts who are not travelling, the search has to be made outside the reservation system.
Beneath the ID of friends with an overlapping flight and destination is shown, at 34, a list of friends that the social networking system has indicated to be living in the destination city selected. In this case the name and icon of Stephane Cheikh is listed. This information may also be shared with other listed friends on the social networking web site.
Thus, through storage of social networking identifiers, the system can determine which of a user's listed friends or contacts on that social networking site has an overlapping booking in terms of destination and dates. This may be flight specific or identify that they will be in the same place at the same time. Additionally, by interaction with the social networking website, the system can notify the user of any of their friends listed as friends on the social networking site that are recorded by the social networking site as being resident in their chosen destination city.
It will be appreciated that the notification of friends in the destination city is not essential and may be omitted. Alternatively, the notification of friends in the destination city could be used without the notification of friends having overlapping flights and destinations.
Another option is for the system to return to the user the IDs of friends or contacts who have travelled to the destination, so that the travelling party may contact them with a view to discussing their journey.
The description above was concerned with the booking or reservation process.
In
A user will check-in after they have already made a reservation. Their social networking ID may already be stored in a check-in database 36 with other details of the flight for which they are checking in. This check-in database may be the same as, or in communication with, the booking database 14 of
When a subsequent user checks-in for a flight, multiple searches are made. First, the Booking Engine initiates the check-in process on the airline reservation system and returns data to the client, for example in a web browser, showing the available seats for selection.
In parallel, the client browser initiates an asynchronous enquiry 40 to the booking engine. As with the previous embodiment, the client browser sends the list of the social networking identifications of their friends' or contacts' lists which is retrieved from the social networking website to the booking engine together with flight data such as fight number and departure date. The booking engine 10 then searches at 42 for other bookings already stored and looks for IDs from that list which have already checked into the flight onto which the user is checking in so comparing IDs and flight data. The details of that user, together with their seat number are returned to the user's browser and displayed on a flight information screen alongside the check-in options.
The flight information display is shown in
This information may be displayed in other ways, for example the seat number may be omitted or the system may ask the user whether they want to sit next to their friend.
The system may also return details of friends who are booked on the flight, but have not yet checked in. In that case, the display will indicate that they are scheduled to travel on the flight but have not yet booked in.
The reservation and check-in processes have been described as separate processes. However, some airlines allow check-in to take place at the time of ticket reservation and booking. The embodiment of
Where the reservation is for accommodation, for example in a hotel, the system may display the ID of the friend or contact who is also staying in the hotel. Where that friend or contact has already check-in, the room number may also be displayed.
Embodiments of the invention have the advantage that they utilise features of social networking platforms such as web sites that are common to all such platforms to enhance the booking and/or check-in process so that the user becomes aware of friends or contacts who are booked onto the same flight or checked in onto the same flight, who are travelling to the same destination over an overlapping period, or who are resident in the destination to which the user is travelling.
Many modifications may be made to the embodiments described without departing from the scope of the invention. For example, in the embodiment of
In the embodiment above, the social networking website is interrogated to retrieve the user's friends or contacts list at the time of booking or checking-in. In an alternative embodiment this step is performed when the user first registers or uses the system, that is when they first enter their own social networking ID into the system or an associated system from which it can be retrieved. This has the advantage that the booking system does not need to interrogate the social networking website at the time of reservation or check-in which may make the process faster. However it does have the disadvantage that the friends or contact list, which can be stored at the booking or check-in database may become out-of-date. This problem could be overcome by regular update enquiries to the social networking platform.
As well as identifying friends or contacts at check-in who have already checked-in or who are due to check-in, the system may, at this point, identify parties who will be at the same destination at the same time or who are listed as resident in that destination as described with respect to the reservation process of
This application is a U.S. national phase application and claims the benefit of and priority under 35 U.S.C. §§119, 120 to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/425,507, filed Dec. 21, 2010, entitled “Reservation System and Method”, by Kevin O'Sullivan et al., and to International Patent Application No. PCT/EP2011/072286, filed Dec. 9, 2011, entitled “Reservation System and Method”, by Kevin O'Sullivan et al., the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference as if set forth herein in their entireties.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2011/072286 | 12/9/2011 | WO | 00 | 12/20/2013 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2012/084549 | 6/28/2012 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4821118 | Lafreniere | Apr 1989 | A |
5270921 | Hornick | Dec 1993 | A |
5918209 | Campbell et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
6108636 | Yap et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6112185 | Walker et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6158658 | Barclay | Dec 2000 | A |
6192416 | Baxter | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6367016 | Lambert et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6473704 | Ito et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6661340 | Saylor et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6695203 | Iki et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6757712 | Bastian et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6760778 | Nelson et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6869023 | Hawes et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
7035828 | Ketonen et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7212978 | Kowal et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7258276 | Linton et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7327262 | Motteram et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7421319 | Stefani | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7440967 | Chidlovskii | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7454203 | Levitan | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7483696 | Mitchell | Jan 2009 | B1 |
7486960 | Brady et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7539985 | Marvin | May 2009 | B2 |
7571206 | Koning et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7607080 | Heuer et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7664672 | Walker et al. | Feb 2010 | B1 |
7668873 | Davis et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7685009 | Halavais et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7702328 | Lemond et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7720724 | Kurashige | May 2010 | B2 |
7739292 | Falk et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7786899 | Baker et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7805523 | Mitchell et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7870101 | Hubbard et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7882137 | Lepman | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7907067 | Baker et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7907545 | Ric | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7949335 | Stefani et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7954712 | Babcock et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8001519 | Conallen et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8058972 | Mohanty | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8087583 | Hawes | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8090603 | Payne et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8117051 | Sauvage et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8160759 | Baker et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8165809 | Baker et al. | Apr 2012 | B1 |
8170535 | Lopes et al. | May 2012 | B1 |
8195151 | Cerra, II et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8214144 | Baker et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8229458 | Busch | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8296281 | Baker et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8332136 | Baker et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8606508 | Baker et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8671009 | Coley | Mar 2014 | B1 |
8700236 | Berman | Apr 2014 | B1 |
8713661 | Vysogorets et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
20020138184 | Kipersztok et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020138625 | Bruner et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020160773 | Gresham et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030034390 | Linton et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030048471 | Lundgren | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030093187 | Walker | May 2003 | A1 |
20030111530 | Iki | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030130769 | Farley et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030146871 | Karr et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030150922 | Hawes | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030220116 | Sagefalk et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040030855 | Takeuchi et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040039617 | Maycotte et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040128193 | Brice et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040249836 | Reynders et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050004919 | Green et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050033666 | Kurashige | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050071206 | Berge | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050228702 | Fairbanks et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050258247 | Hawes | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060004590 | Khoo | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060004781 | Burgel et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060053056 | Alspach-Goss et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060075934 | Ram | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060085451 | Pal et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060095434 | McCullough et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060097046 | Fassio et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060173680 | Verhasselt et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060206246 | Walker | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060234700 | Funderburk et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060238384 | Hess et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060259456 | Falk et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060277231 | Kral et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060288021 | Kojima | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070055416 | Allen | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070072590 | Levitan | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070111725 | Kauffman et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070127460 | Wilber et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070149216 | Misikangas | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070157078 | Anderson | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070198314 | Andrew et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070203796 | Riggs | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070222595 | Motteram et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070233617 | Gillespie | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070244766 | Goel | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070250356 | Douglas | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070265881 | El Elman et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070273514 | Winand et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080010005 | Small et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080015926 | De Marcken | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080027765 | Gunn et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080027955 | May et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080046298 | Ben-Yehuda et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080065480 | Baker et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080070517 | Brady et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080091445 | Mihic | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080099552 | Grillion | May 2008 | A1 |
20080140226 | Ganev | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080140434 | O'Brien | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080224823 | Lawson et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080229228 | Cohen | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090010200 | Lauer et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090015398 | Bhogal et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090030781 | Mehta et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090033491 | Saunders | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090063219 | Raufaste et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090070841 | Buga et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090081947 | Margis | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090112473 | Lu et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090164500 | Mathur et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090182590 | Ashby et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090187494 | Heath | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090196201 | Ric | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090248457 | Munter et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090256675 | Kerr | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090259549 | Winand et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090287513 | Anderson et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090288123 | Havlovick et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090307020 | Viale et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090310530 | Cerra, II et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090313601 | Baird et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100027461 | Bothorel | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100030591 | Viard et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100065632 | Babcock et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100076795 | Steir et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100076826 | Bayne | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100078475 | Lin et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100102934 | Guichard | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100159871 | Tester | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100190510 | Maranhas et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100191782 | Brzozowski | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100198628 | Rayner | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100205448 | Tarhan et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100205605 | Johnson et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100245034 | D'Oliveiro et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100268656 | Teicher | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100332358 | Owens | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110004832 | Canal et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110018769 | Misikangas et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110028160 | Roeding et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110119183 | Berman | May 2011 | A1 |
20110227737 | Kamins | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120035965 | Maguire et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120042263 | Rapaport | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120042371 | Gur et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120075168 | Osterhout et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120101885 | Lee et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120123844 | Fano et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120129546 | Yang et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120200390 | Saravanan | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120203578 | Baggett et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120284108 | Fontana et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130069985 | Wong et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130141313 | Zhou et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130211864 | Sanderson et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130234849 | Gupta et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130267255 | Liu et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130295966 | Dingler et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130297103 | Baker et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130314257 | Macrae et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130325526 | Tyler | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140006070 | Stamler | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140012640 | Roberts et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140039717 | Henkel | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140052482 | Le Marier et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140067244 | Baker et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140075506 | Davis et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140123315 | Baker et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140188311 | Masson | Jul 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2002317935 | Jan 2003 | AU |
101436185 | May 2009 | CN |
10357831 | Jul 2005 | DE |
1318463 | Jun 2003 | EP |
1454306 | Sep 2004 | EP |
1 610 094 | Dec 2005 | EP |
1679624 | Jul 2006 | EP |
1874001 | Jan 2008 | EP |
2088543 | Aug 2009 | EP |
2088569 | Aug 2009 | EP |
2222053 | Aug 2010 | EP |
2290600 | Mar 2011 | EP |
2362354 | Aug 2011 | EP |
2 390 845 | Nov 2011 | EP |
2474931 | Jul 2012 | EP |
2366945 | Mar 2002 | GB |
2408131 | Mar 2006 | GB |
2418511 | Mar 2006 | GB |
2469026 | Oct 2010 | GB |
2470897 | Dec 2010 | GB |
2501144 | Oct 2013 | GB |
2005135199 | May 2005 | JP |
2006053724 | Feb 2006 | JP |
2008117340 | May 2008 | JP |
2008171181 | Jul 2008 | JP |
2009093603 | Apr 2009 | JP |
0073954 | Dec 2000 | WO |
0135269 | May 2001 | WO |
0135289 | May 2001 | WO |
0157323 | Aug 2001 | WO |
0215582 | Feb 2002 | WO |
03005237 | Jan 2003 | WO |
2004045106 | Mar 2004 | WO |
2006010774 | Feb 2006 | WO |
2007113844 | Oct 2007 | WO |
2008055181 | May 2008 | WO |
2009002139 | Dec 2008 | WO |
2009021068 | Feb 2009 | WO |
2009058505 | May 2009 | WO |
2009091553 | Jul 2009 | WO |
2011057323 | May 2011 | WO |
2011088233 | Jul 2011 | WO |
2012106075 | Aug 2012 | WO |
2012105829 | Sep 2012 | WO |
2013079512 | Jun 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“Social Networks, Job Search Methods and Reservation Wages: Evidence for Germany”—Caliendo et al, IZA Sep. 2010 http://ftp.iza.org/dp5165.pdf. |
Sam Schechner, “Airlines Entertain Tablet Ideas—Rather Than Wiring Planes for In-Flight Movies, Some Hand Out iPads”, http://online.wsj.com/articles/SB10000872396390443916104578020601759253578, Sep. 2012. |
Mary Kirby, “Personal Services—In-flight connectivity poised to change the passenger experience for ever”, http://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/personal-services-in-flight-connectivity-poised-to-change-the-passenger-experience-for-332765/, Sep. 2009. |
Lawrence Kitson, “The Future of In-flight: Part Two—The Concierge Concept”, http://ustwo.com/blog/the-future-of-in-flight-part-two-the-concierge-concept/, Apr. 2012. |
Examination Report of Malaysian Application No. 2013001405, received from the Intellectual Property Corporation of Malaysia on Oct. 28, 2014. |
International Civil Aviation Organization, Machine Readable Travel Documents, Part 1, Machine Readable Passports—vol. 1, Specifications for Electronically Enabled Passports with Biometric Identification Capability, Sixth Edition, 99 pages, 2006. |
International Civil Aviation Organization, Machine Readable Travel Documents, Part 1, Machine Readable Passports—vol. 2, Passports with Machine Readable Data Stored in Optical Character Recognition Format, Sixth Edition, 131 pages, 2006. |
International Civil Aviation Organization, Machine Readable Travel Documents, Part 3, Machine Readable Official Travel Documents—vol. 1, MRtds with Machine Readable Data Stored in Optical Character Recognition Text International Civil Aviation Organization, Third Edition, 122 pages, 2008. |
International Civil Aviation Organization, Machine Readable Travel Documents, Part 3, Machine Readable Official Travel Documents—vol. 2, Specifications for Electronically Enabled MRtds with Biometric Identification Capability, Third Edition, 149 pages, 2008. |
Dunkel, Jürgen, et al., Model-Driven Architecture for Mobile Applications, pp. 464-477, 2007, Hannover University of Applied Sciences and Arts, Department of Computer Sciences, Hannover Germany. |
Glushko, Robert J., et al., Bridging the “Front Stage” and “Back Stage” in Service System Design, pp. 1-10, 2008, University of California, Berkely, School of Information, Proceedings of the 41st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE). |
Johnston, Michael, et al., Multimodal Applications from Mobile to Kiosk, 4 pages, AT&T Research, Florham Park, New Jersey, USA. |
Kindervater, Gerard, Revenue Management in the Airline Passenger Industry, 24 pages, AirFrance KLM. |
Li, Quanzhong, et al., XVM: A Bridge Between XML Data and Its Behavior, 9 pages, May 17-22, 2004, 13th International Conference on World Wide Web, New York, New York, USA. |
Madria, Sanjay, An XML Schema Integration and Query Mechanism System, pp. 266-303, 2007, Elsevier B.V., Science Direct, Data & Knowledge Engineering 65 (2008). |
McGuire, Kelly A., et al., The Future of Revenue Management, 5 pages, 2009, SAS Global Forum 2009, SAS Institute, Inc. |
Smith, Barry C., et al., Yield Management at American Airlines, pp. 8-31, 1992, American Airlines Decision Technologies, Dallas/Fort Worth Airport, Texas, USA. |
Xu, Liping, et al., A Model of Capacity Control with Overbooking for a Two-leg Airlines Network, 5 pages, 2008, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE). |
Marmesse, M., et al., Location-aware Information Delivery with comMotion, MIT Media Laboratory, Cambridge, MA, HUC 2000 Proceedings, pp. 157-171, Springer-Verlag. |
Chen, G., et al., A Survey of Context-Aware Mobile Computing Research, Dartmouth College, Department of Computer Science, Hanover, New Hampshire. |
Munoz, M., et al., Context-Aware Mobile Communication in Hospitals, IEEE Computer Society, Sep. 2003. |
Schwinger, W., et al., Context-Aware in Mobile Tourism Guides—A Comprehensive Survey, Austrian Federal Ministry for Education, Science, and Culture, and the European Social Fund, 2002. |
Kinneging, T., Machine Readable Travel Documents—Technical Report: PKI for Machine Readable Travel Documents Offering ICC Read-Only Access, PKI Task Force, International Civil Aviation Organization, Version 1.1, Oct. 1, 2004. |
International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Search Authority (EPO) for PCT/EP2013/057497 dated Jun. 27, 2013. |
Susan Stellin, “Automation Is Considered for Checking IDs in Airports”, Business Day, The New York Times, Mar. 19, 2012, 3 pages, retrieved Sep. 4, 2014, http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/20/business/tsa-is-considering-automating-id-checks.html. |
Robert Longley, “TSA's New ID, Boarding Pass Scanning System Draws Criticism”, US Government, About.com, Aug. 2, 2012, 2 pages, retrieved online on Jul. 30, 2014, http://usgovinfo.about.com/od/defenseandsecurity/a/Tsa-Boarding-Pass-Scanning-System-Draws-Criticsm.htm#&newsissues&newsissues. |
Search Report of Application No. GB 1403967.1, received from the UK Intellectual Property Office on Aug. 4, 2014. |
Examination Opinion of Application No. GB 1403967.1, received from the UK Intellectual Property Office on Aug. 5, 2014. |
Search Report of Singapore Application No. 201306353-2, received from the Danish Patent and Trademark Office on Jun. 16, 2014. |
Written Opinion of Singapore Application No. 201306353-2, received from the Danish Patent and Trademark Office on Jun. 16, 2014. |
International Search Report for PCT/EP2011/072286, dated Mar. 19, 2012. |
AIRCOM Server Administrator Guide, SITA Airline Telecommunications and Information Services, Feb. 19, 2013, pp. 1-280. |
AIRCOM Server User Guide, SITA Airline Telecommunications and Information Services, Jan. 24, 2013, pp. 1-153. |
Examination Report received in Malaysian Application No. PI 2013000936. |
International Search Report and the Written Opinion mailed in International Application No. PCT/EP2013/052590 filed Aug. 2, 2013. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed in International Application No. PCT/EP2011/070551 filed Nov. 21, 2011. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed in International Application No. PCT/EP2014/062464 filed Jun. 13, 2014. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed in International Application No. PCT/EP2015/053319 filed Feb. 17, 2015. |
Russian Search Report for 2013133853/08(050668) mailed Feb. 20, 2015. |
Search Report and Examination Opinion mailed in International Application No. GB1421313.6. |
Search Report and Written Opinion of Singapore Application No. 201301980-7, dated Sep. 3, 2013. |
Written Opinion mailed in Singapore Application No. 201301978-1, dated Oct. 15, 2013. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed in Singapore Application No. 11201404575U. |
Glaser-Opitz, et al., Evaluation of CPDLC and Voice Communication During Approach Phase, Digital Avionics Conference, Sep. 13-17, 2015. |
Hull, et al., Technology-Enabled Airborne Spacing and Merging, Digital Avionics Systems Conference, 2004. |
International Examination Report mailed in Australian Application No. 2011347893 dated Sep. 11, 2015. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed in International Application PCT/EP2015/068682 dated Oct. 29, 2015. |
Kenney, et al., Secure ATC Surveillance for Military Applications, Military Communications Conference, 2008. |
Lee, et al., Effectiveness of the Ground-Based Transceiver (GBT) Parrot System for Monitoring GPS Integrity for Alaska ATC “Radar-Like Services” Using ADS-B, Digital Avionics Systems Conference, 2004. |
Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Apr. 2, 2014 in GB Application No. 1317659.9. |
Belobaba, Fundamentals of Pricing and Revenue Management, The Global Airline Industry, 2009. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140115057 A1 | Apr 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61425507 | Dec 2010 | US |