Reservoir stimulation comprising hydraulic fracturing through extended tunnels

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11466549
  • Patent Number
    11,466,549
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, January 4, 2018
    6 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 11, 2022
    a year ago
Abstract
A technique facilitates hydrocarbon fluid production. A well is formed in a subterranean region by drilling a borehole, e.g. a generally vertical wellbore. At least one tunnel is formed and oriented to extend outwardly from the borehole at least 10 feet into a formation surrounding the borehole. The orientation of the at least one tunnel is selected such that it extends at a desired angle with respect to a direction of horizontal stress in the formation. A fracture stimulation of the at least one tunnel is performed to create a network of fractures. The orientation of the at least one tunnel ensures that the network of fractures extends through a target zone in a hydrocarbon bearing region of the formation.
Description
BACKGROUND

In various well applications, the subterranean formation is stimulated to enhance recovery of hydrocarbon fluids such as oil and gas. One form of well stimulation is hydraulic fracturing which may be conducted in a wellbore following a drilling operation and an optional casing operation. Hydraulic fracturing operations initially were performed in single stage vertical or near vertical wells. To further improve productivity, however, hydraulic fracturing operations have trended toward use in generally horizontal wells. Although horizontal fracturing operations have improved productivity, current methods have limitations with respect to productivity and efficiency in certain types of subterranean environments and operations.


SUMMARY

In general, the present disclosure provides a methodology and system for enhancing hydrocarbon fluid production. A well is formed in a subterranean region by drilling a borehole, e.g. a generally vertical wellbore. At least one tunnel, e.g. two tunnels, may be formed and oriented to extend outwardly from the borehole at least 10 feet into a formation surrounding the borehole. The orientation of the tunnels is selected such that the tunnels extend at a desired azimuthal orientation and/or deviation. For example, the orientation of the tunnels may be selected with respect to a direction of maximum horizontal stress in the formation. A fracture stimulation of the tunnels is performed to create a network of fractures. The orientation of the tunnels ensures that the network of fractures extends through a target zone in a hydrocarbon bearing region of the formation.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Certain embodiments will hereafter be described with reference to the accompanying drawings, wherein like reference numerals denote like elements. It should be understood, however, that the accompanying figures illustrate various implementations described herein and are not meant to limit the scope of various technologies described herein, and:



FIG. 1 is a schematic illustration of an example of a well system having a generally vertical borehole and a plurality of tunnels extending from the borehole, according to an embodiment of the disclosure;



FIG. 2 is another schematic illustration of an example of a well system with a borehole and a plurality of tunnels, according to an embodiment of the disclosure;



FIG. 3 is a graphical illustration showing a fracture geometry created from a vertical borehole, according to an embodiment of the disclosure;



FIG. 4 is a graphical illustration showing a fracture geometry created from a plurality of tunnels extending laterally from a vertical borehole, according to an embodiment of the disclosure; and



FIG. 5 is a graphical illustration comparing predicted barrels of oil produced from a fractured vertical borehole versus fractured lateral tunnels extending from a vertical borehole, according to an embodiment of the disclosure.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

In the following description, numerous details are set forth to provide an understanding of some illustrative embodiments of the present disclosure. However, it will be understood by those of ordinary skill in the art that the system and/or methodology may be practiced without these details and that numerous variations or modifications from the described embodiments may be possible.


The disclosure herein generally relates to a methodology and system for enhancing hydrocarbon fluid production. A well is formed in a subterranean region by drilling a borehole, e.g. a generally vertical wellbore. At least one tunnel, e.g. at least two tunnels, may be formed and oriented to extend outwardly from the borehole at least 10 feet into a formation surrounding the borehole. In some operations, the tunnels may be formed to extend outwardly from the borehole at least 15 feet and in other operations at least 20 feet. For example, some applications may utilize tunnels substantially longer than 20 feet. In various formations, the borehole is oriented generally vertically and the tunnels extend outwardly generally horizontally. However, some applications may utilize a deviated, e.g. horizontal, borehole with tunnels extending outwardly from the deviated borehole. Depending on the application and characteristics of the subterranean region, the tunnels may be oriented generally horizontally, generally vertically, or at desired orientations therebetween.


The orientation of the tunnels may be selected such that each tunnel extends at a desired angle with respect to a direction of principal stresses in the formation. For example, the tunnel azimuths may be oriented in a direction of maximum horizontal stress, minimum horizontal stress, or at a desired other angle with respect to the maximum horizontal stress. Additionally, the tunnel azimuths (as well as the borehole azimuth) may be constant but they may also vary in some applications, e.g. to achieve a desired positioning with respect to a hydrocarbon bearing target zone in a formation.


Once the tunnels are formed, a fracture stimulation of the tunnels may be performed to create a network of fractures. For example, a hydraulic fracturing fluid may be pumped downhole and out through the tunnel or tunnels to create fracture networks extending from each tunnel. The fracture networks may be formed to extend laterally from each tunnel but they also may be formed parallel with the tunnels and/or at other desired orientations. The orientation of the tunnels ensures that the network of fractures extends through a target zone in a hydrocarbon bearing region of the formation.


The diameter of the tunnels may vary according to the formation and/or other parameters of a given operation. By way of example, the tunnels are generally smaller in diameter than casing used along the borehole from which they extend. In some operations, the tunnel diameters may be 2 inches or less and in other operations the tunnel diameters may be 1.5 inches or less. However, some embodiments may utilize tunnels equal to or larger in diameter than the borehole. The diameter of the tunnels may be selected according to parameters of the formation and/or types of equipment used for forming the tunnels. Also, the resultant diameter of the tunnels may vary depending on the technique used to form the tunnels, e.g. drilling, jetting, or other suitable technique.


In some embodiments, the borehole may be drilled at least in part in a non-productive zone of the subterranean formation. The non-productive zone may be a zone which contains limited amounts of hydrocarbon fluid or is less desirable with respect to production of hydrocarbon fluid. Depending on the characteristics of the subterranean region, the borehole may be drilled in nonproductive rock and/or in a region with petrophysical and geo-mechanical properties different from the properties of the target zone. For example, the borehole may be drilled in a region of the formation having a substantially higher minimum in situ stress relative to that of the target zone. It should be noted the tunnels may be used in many types of formations, e.g. laminated formations, to facilitate flow of fluid to the tunnels through fracture networks even in the presence of pinch points between formation layers.


To facilitate production, at least one tunnel is formed which intersects the borehole and extends into a target zone, e.g. a productive zone containing hydrocarbon fluid. Often, a plurality of tunnels, e.g. at least two tunnels, may be formed to extend from the borehole outwardly into the target zone to serve as extended treatment passages. The target zone may be a single region or separate distinct regions of the formation. In some applications, the borehole may be entirely outside of the target zone and a plurality of tunnels may be formed in desired directions to reach the target zone. For example, the tunnels may be formed generally horizontally, generally vertically, generally along desired angles between horizontal and vertical, in generally opposed directions with respect to each other, or at other orientations with respect to each other. In other applications, however, the borehole may extend into or through the target zone.


As described above, the well stimulation may comprise a hydraulic fracturing of the stimulation zone or zones. During hydraulic fracturing, a fracturing fluid may be pumped down through the borehole and out through the plurality of tunnels. The fracturing fluid is forced under pressure from the tunnels out into the surrounding subterranean formation, e.g. into the surrounding hydrocarbon bearing target zone, to fracture the surrounding subterranean formation. For example, the surrounding subterranean formation may be fractured at a plurality of stimulation zones within the overall target zone.


It should be noted the fracturing fluid also may comprise propping agent for providing fracture conductivity after fracture closure. In certain embodiments, the fracturing fluid may comprise acid such as hydrochloric acid, acetic acid, citric acid, hydrofluoric acid, other acids, or mixtures thereof. The fracturing of the stimulation zones within the target zone enhances production of hydrocarbon fluid from the target zone to the wellbore and ultimately to the surface. The target zone may be a productive zone of the subterranean region containing desired hydrocarbon fluid, e.g. oil and/or gas.


Referring generally to FIG. 1, an embodiment of a well system 20 is illustrated as extending into a subterranean formation 22. The well system 20 enables a methodology for enhancing recovery of hydrocarbon fluid, e.g. oil and/or gas, from a well. In this embodiment, a borehole 24, e.g. a generally vertical wellbore, is drilled down into the subterranean formation 22. The borehole 24 may be drilled into or may be drilled outside of a target zone 26 (or target zones 26) containing, for example, a hydrocarbon fluid 28.


In the example illustrated, the borehole 24 is a generally vertical wellbore extending downwardly from a surface 30. However, some operations may form deviations in the borehole 24, e.g. a lateral section of the borehole 24, to facilitate hydrocarbon recovery. In some embodiments, the borehole 24 may be formed in nonproductive rock of formation 22 and/or in a zone with petrophysical and geo-mechanical properties different from the properties found in the target zone or zones 26.


At least one tunnel 32, e.g. a plurality of tunnels 32, may be formed to intersect the borehole 24. In the example illustrated, at least two tunnels 32 are formed to intersect the borehole 24 and to extend outwardly from the borehole 24. For example, the tunnels 32 may be formed and oriented laterally, e.g. generally horizontally, with respect to the borehole 24. Additionally, the tunnels 32 may be oriented to extend from borehole 24 in different directions, e.g. opposite directions, so as to extend into the desired target zone or zones 26.


The tunnels 32 provide fluid communication with an interior of the borehole/wellbore 24 to facilitate flow of the desired hydrocarbon fluid 28 from tunnels 32, into borehole 24, and up through borehole 24 to, for example, a collection location at surface 30. Furthermore, the tunnels 32 may be oriented in selected directions based on the material forming subterranean formation 22 and on the location of desired target zones 26.


Depending on the characteristics of the subterranean formation 22 and target zones 26, the tunnels 32 may be formed along various azimuths. For example, the tunnels 32 may be formed in alignment with a direction of maximum horizontal stress, represented by arrow 34, in formation 22. However, the tunnels may be formed along other azimuths such as in alignment with a direction of minimum horizontal stress in the formation, as represented by arrow 36.


In some embodiments, the tunnels 32 may be formed at a desired angle or angles with respect to principal stresses when selecting azimuthal directions. According to an example, the tunnel or tunnels 32 may be oriented at a desired angle with respect to the maximum horizontal stress in formation 22. It should be noted the azimuth and/or deviation of an individual tunnel 32 may be constant but the azimuth and/or deviation also may vary along the individual tunnel 32 to, for example, enable formation of the tunnel through a desired zone to facilitate recovery of hydrocarbon fluids 28.


Additionally, at least one of the tunnels 32 may be formed and oriented to take advantage of a natural fracture 38 or multiple natural fractures 38 which occur in formation 22. The natural fracture 38 may be used as a flow conduit which facilitates flow of the hydrocarbon fluid 28 into the tunnel or tunnels 32. Once the hydrocarbon fluid 28 enters the tunnels 32, the fluid is able to readily flow into wellbore 24 for production to the surface or other collection location.


Depending on the parameters of a given formation 22 and hydrocarbon recovery operation, the diameter and length of tunnels 32 also may vary. The tunnels 32 are generally longer than the lengths of perforations formed in a conventional perforation operation. According to an embodiment, the tunnels 32 extend from the borehole 24 at least 10 feet into the formation 22 surrounding the borehole 24. However, some embodiments of the methodology utilize tunnels 32 which extend from the borehole 24 at least 15 feet into the formation 22. Other embodiments of the methodology utilize tunnels 32 which extend from the borehole 24 at least 20 feet into the formation 22. For example, some embodiments may utilize tunnels substantially longer than 20 feet.


Each tunnel 32 also has a diameter generally smaller than the diameter of borehole 24, e.g. smaller than the diameter of casing which may be used to line borehole 24. With respect to diameter, various embodiments utilize tunnels 32 having a diameter of 2 inches or less. However, some embodiments of the methodology utilize tunnels 32 having a diameter of 1.5 inches or less. The actual lengths, diameters, and orientations of tunnels 32 may be adjusted according to the parameters of the formation 22, target zones 26, and objectives of the hydrocarbon recovery operation.


With additional reference to FIG. 2, a stimulation operation may be performed via tunnels 32 to deliver stimulating fluid to stimulation zones 40 which are distributed through the target zone(s) 26. Distributing the stimulating fluid under pressure to the stimulation zones 40 creates fracture networks 42. The fracture networks 42 facilitate flow of fluid into the corresponding tunnels 32. By way of example, the stimulation operation may comprise hydraulic fracturing performed to fracture the subterranean formation 22, e.g. oil or gas bearing target zone 26, so as to facilitate flow of the desired fluid along the resulting fracture networks 42 and into the corresponding tunnels 32.


If the stimulation operation is a hydraulic fracturing operation, fracturing fluid may be pumped from the surface under pressure, down through wellbore 24, into tunnels 32, and then into the stimulation zones 40 surrounding the corresponding tunnels 32 as indicated by arrows 44. The pressurized fracturing fluid 44 causes formation 22 to fracture in a manner which creates the fracture networks 42 in stimulation zones 40. According to an embodiment, the tunnels 32/zones 40 may be fractured sequentially. For example, the fracturing operation may be performed through sequential tunnels 32 and/or sequentially through individual tunnels 32 to cause sequential fracturing of the stimulation zones 40 and creation of the resultant fracture networks 42.


The tunnels 32 may be formed via a variety of techniques, such as various drilling techniques or jetting techniques. For example, drilling equipment may be deployed down into wellbore 24 and used to form the desired number of tunnels 32 in appropriate orientations for a given subterranean environment and production operation. However, the tunnels 32 also may be formed by other suitable techniques, such as jetting techniques, laser techniques, injection of reactive fluid techniques, electrical decomposition techniques, or other tunnel formation techniques. In a specific example, the tunnels 32 may be jetted using hydraulic jetting technology similar to hydraulic jetting technologies available from Radial Drilling Services Ltd, Viper Drill of Houston Tex., Jett-Drill Well Services Ltd, or Fishbones AS of Stavanger Norway.


The use of tunnels 32 during the stimulation operation enables creation of fracture networks 42. The fracture networks 42 provide fractures with an increased density, thus increasing the size of the contact area with respect to each target zone 26 containing hydrocarbon fluid 28. This, in turn, leads to an increase in well productivity compared to wells completed without utilizing tunnels 32.


As illustrated graphically in FIGS. 3 and 4, for example, the fracture geometry of a vertical well perforated and fractured without tunnels 32 (see FIG. 3) is substantially smaller and less dense than the fracture geometry of a vertical well with opposed tunnels 32 which was hydraulically fractured via the tunnels 32 to create the fracture networks 42 (see FIG. 4). According to modeled fracture geometry and well production computations (including orientation of extended tunnels 32), the fracture networks 42 resulting from fracturing via tunnels 32 substantially improves productivity. According to one example, performing hydraulic fracturing via extended tunnels 32 initiates fractures in transverse directions and increases the well productivity substantially, e.g. by 33% or more, compared to a well which is fracture stimulated without use of the tunnels 32.


The projected oil production from such wells is illustrated graphically in FIG. 5. In FIG. 5, graph line 46 corresponds to projected production resulting from a fracturing operation without tunnels 32 and graph line 48 corresponds to projected production resulting from a fracturing operation utilizing tunnels 32 to create the fracture networks 42 in stimulation zones 40. The projections are based on a comparison of flow resulting from different test applications combined with modeling of the stimulation techniques.


In an operational example, the orientation of tunnels 32 may be determined based on various well productivity considerations prior to creating the tunnels 32. For example, the tunnels 32 may be created in the direction of maximum horizontal stress to enable formation of fractures which are aligned with the direction of such tunnels 32. In other embodiments, the extended tunnels 32 may be created in a direction perpendicular to a direction of maximum horizontal stress information 22 to enable creation of fractures oriented perpendicular to the direction of tunnels 32.


The tunnels 32 also may be placed at an angle to the principal horizontal stresses such that the created fractures are oblique with respect to the tunnels 32. As described above, individual tunnels 32 also may be oriented to intersect natural fractures 38 within the formation 22 which may be further activated during subsequent stimulation. In some embodiments, the tunnels 32 may be formed at a desired angle with respect to a horizontal plane.


It should be noted production levels corresponding to various orientations of the tunnels 32 can be forecast by employing various well production modeling techniques using software products such as Kinetix™ available from Schlumberger Corporation, Gohfer® available from Barree & Associates, or other suitable software products. Depending on the parameters of a given operation, the wellbore 24 may be an open hole, a cased hole with packers and port collars, or a wellbore with a cased and cemented completion. The tunnels 32 may be formed as extended treatment passages and may be created prior to or subsequent to casing the wellbore 24.


Use of tunnels 32 and the stimulation techniques described herein also may be employed to reduce the amount of sand and material delivered downhole in a variety of fracturing operations while still enhancing production of the desired hydrocarbon fluids. Although the tunnels 32 effectively increase production via vertical wellbore 24, the tunnels 32 and stimulation techniques described herein may be used in vertical wells and deviated wells, e.g. horizontal wells, in unconventional or conventional formations.


Depending on the parameters of a given application, the wellbore geometries described herein may be adjusted according to the type, size, orientation, and other features of the target zone or zones 26. Additionally, the location of the borehole 24 as well as the tunnels 32 may be affected by the type of non-productive zones adjacent the target zone(s) 26 containing desired hydrocarbon fluids 28. Similarly, many different types of equipment, e.g. packers, valves, sleeves, sand screens, and/or other types of equipment may be used in completing the wellbore 24. Various sections of the wellbore 24 may be cased or open-hole depending on the parameters of the specific application.


Although a few embodiments of the system and methodology have been described in detail above, those of ordinary skill in the art will readily appreciate that many modifications are possible without materially departing from the teachings of this disclosure. Accordingly, such modifications are intended to be included within the scope of this disclosure as defined in the claims.

Claims
  • 1. A method for enhancing hydrocarbon fluid production, comprising: drilling a generally vertical borehole in a formation zone;forming a tunnel extending outwardly from the generally vertical borehole at least 10 feet into a formation surrounding the generally vertical borehole by utilizing a one of drilling and hydraulic jetting;orienting the tunnel to intersect the formation zone at a predetermined angle with respect to a direction of maximum horizontal stress in the formation zone, wherein the predetermined angle is determined by a forecast production level from a well production modeling technique; andperforming a fracture stimulation of the tunnel to create a network of fractures through a target zone which is a hydrocarbon bearing region of the formation,wherein an azimuth of the tunnel is selected with respect to the target zone to ensure that the network of fractures extends through the target zone when performing the fracture stimulation.
  • 2. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein forming the tunnel comprises forming at least two tunnels with diameters of less than 2 inches.
  • 3. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein forming the tunnel comprises forming at least two tunnels with diameters of less than 1.5 inches.
  • 4. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein forming the tunnel comprises forming at least two tunnels in alignment with a direction of maximum horizontal stress in the formation.
  • 5. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein forming the tunnel comprises forming at least two tunnels in alignment with a direction of minimum horizontal stress in the formation.
  • 6. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein forming the tunnel comprises forming at least two tunnels in a substantially horizontal orientation.
  • 7. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein drilling comprises drilling the generally vertical borehole outside of the target zone.
  • 8. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein performing the fracture stimulation comprises performing a hydraulic fracture operation.
  • 9. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein forming comprises orienting the tunnel to intersect a natural fracture.
  • 10. A method, comprising: drilling a borehole in a formation zone having different petrophysical and geo-mechanical properties than at least one target zone in a hydrocarbon bearing formation;forming a first tunnel extending from the borehole laterally and a second tunnel extending from the borehole laterally in a different direction than the first tunnel, wherein forming comprises utilizing a one of drilling and hydraulic jetting;orienting the first tunnel and the second tunnel to intersect the at least one target zone at a predetermined angle with respect to a direction of maximum horizontal stress in the hydrocarbon bearing formation, wherein the predetermined angle is determined by a forecast production level from a well production modeling technique; andperforming a hydraulic fracture stimulation of the first tunnel and the second tunnel to create a network of fractures through the target zone of the hydrocarbon bearing formation and thereby facilitate flow of hydrocarbons from the target zone of the hydrocarbon bearing formation through the first and second tunnels and into the borehole.
  • 11. The method as recited in claim 10, wherein orienting the first and second tunnels comprises orienting the first and second tunnels at desired angles with respect to horizontal stresses in the hydrocarbon bearing formation.
  • 12. The method as recited in claim 10, wherein orienting the first and second tunnels comprises orienting the first and second tunnels in alignment with a direction of maximum horizontal stress in the hydrocarbon bearing formation.
  • 13. The method as recited in claim 10, wherein orienting the first and second tunnels comprises orienting the first and second tunnels in alignment with the direction of minimum horizontal stress in the hydrocarbon bearing formation.
  • 14. The method as recited in claim 10, wherein orienting the first and second tunnels comprises orienting at least one of the first and second tunnels to intersect a natural fracture.
  • 15. The method as recited in claim 10, wherein forming the first and second tunnels comprises forming the first and second tunnels to extend laterally at least 10 feet.
  • 16. The method as recited in claim 10, wherein drilling comprises drilling a generally vertical borehole and wherein orienting the first and second tunnels comprises orienting the first and second tunnels to extend outwardly from the generally vertical borehole.
  • 17. The method as recited in claim 10, wherein drilling comprises drilling a generally horizontal borehole and wherein orienting the first and second tunnels comprises orienting the first and second tunnels to extend outwardly from the generally horizontal borehole.
  • 18. A system to enhance hydrocarbon production, comprising: a generally vertical wellbore having a wellbore diameter in a formation containing a hydrocarbon bearing target zone;at least two tunnels each having a tunnel diameter less than the wellbore diameter, wherein the tunnel diameter is 2 inches or less and extends laterally from the wellbore at least 10 feet, the at least two tunnels being formed by a one of drilling and hydraulic jetting and extending into the hydrocarbon bearing target zone, and wherein the at least two tunnels are oriented to intersect the hydrocarbon bearing target zone at predetermined angles with respect to a direction of maximum horizontal stress in the formation, wherein the predetermined angle is determined by a forecast production level from a well production modeling technique; anda fracture network extending laterally from each tunnel of the at least two tunnels.
  • 19. The system as recited in claim 18, wherein the at least two tunnels extend at least 15 feet from the generally vertical wellbore.
  • 20. The system as recited in claim 19, wherein the at least two tunnels are oriented generally horizontally in opposed directions and extend at least 20 feet from the generally vertical wellbore.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

The present document is based on and claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/442,240, filed Jan. 4, 2017, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/US2018/012312 1/4/2018 WO
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO2018/129136 7/12/2018 WO A
US Referenced Citations (122)
Number Name Date Kind
2731414 Binder, Jr. Jan 1956 A
2808109 Kirk Oct 1957 A
3282337 Pye Nov 1966 A
3336221 Ralston Aug 1967 A
3553099 Savage Jan 1971 A
3704750 Miles Dec 1972 A
3878884 Raleigh Apr 1975 A
3892274 Dill Jul 1975 A
4007797 Jeter Feb 1977 A
4032460 Zilch et al. Jun 1977 A
4036732 Irani et al. Jul 1977 A
4046668 Farcasiu et al. Sep 1977 A
4046669 Blaine et al. Sep 1977 A
4108760 Williams et al. Aug 1978 A
4139450 Hanson et al. Feb 1979 A
4347118 Funk et al. Aug 1982 A
4479541 Wang Oct 1984 A
4519463 Schuh May 1985 A
4613631 Espenscheid et al. Sep 1986 A
4640362 Schellstede Feb 1987 A
4666683 Brown et al. May 1987 A
4848486 Bodine Jul 1989 A
4977961 Avasthi Dec 1990 A
RE33660 Jelsma Aug 1991 E
5261489 Jennings, Jr. et al. Nov 1993 A
5335726 Rodrigues Aug 1994 A
5358051 Rodrigues Oct 1994 A
5373906 Braddick Dec 1994 A
5868210 Johnson et al. Feb 1999 A
5893416 Read Apr 1999 A
6581690 Van Drentham-Susman et al. Jun 2003 B2
7347260 Ferguson et al. Mar 2008 B2
7422059 Jelsma Sep 2008 B2
7431083 Olsen Oct 2008 B2
7441595 Jelsma Oct 2008 B2
7686101 Belew et al. Mar 2010 B2
7788037 Soliman Aug 2010 B2
7971658 Buckman, Sr. Jul 2011 B2
7971659 Gatlin et al. Jul 2011 B2
8167060 Brunet et al. May 2012 B2
8201643 Soby et al. Jun 2012 B2
8220547 Craig et al. Jul 2012 B2
8372786 Berkland et al. Feb 2013 B2
8408333 Pai et al. Apr 2013 B2
8420576 Eoff et al. Apr 2013 B2
8424620 Perry, Jr. et al. Apr 2013 B2
8590618 Jelsma Nov 2013 B2
8672034 Al-Ajmi et al. Mar 2014 B2
8770316 Jelsma Jul 2014 B2
9121272 Potapenko et al. Sep 2015 B2
9567809 Savage Feb 2017 B2
9803134 De Wolf et al. Oct 2017 B2
9976351 Randall May 2018 B2
10005955 Beuterbaugh et al. Jun 2018 B2
20020005286 Mazorow et al. Jan 2002 A1
20030062167 Surjaatmadja et al. Apr 2003 A1
20050056418 Nguyen Mar 2005 A1
20050230107 McDaniel et al. Oct 2005 A1
20060048946 Al-Muraikhi Mar 2006 A1
20060070740 Surjaatmadja et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060102343 Skinner et al. May 2006 A1
20070261852 Surjaatmadja et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070261887 Pai et al. Nov 2007 A1
20080078548 Pauls et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080135292 Sihler et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080139418 Cioletti et al. Jun 2008 A1
20090017678 Meier et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090065253 Suarez-Rivera et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090101414 Brunet et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090114385 Lumbye May 2009 A1
20090250211 Craig Oct 2009 A1
20090288884 Jelsma Nov 2009 A1
20100126722 Cornelissen et al. May 2010 A1
20100187012 Belew et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100243266 Soby et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100282470 Alberty et al. Nov 2010 A1
20110005762 Poole Jan 2011 A1
20110017468 Birch et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110061869 Abass Mar 2011 A1
20110067871 Burdette et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110068787 Freedman et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110147088 Brunet et al. Jun 2011 A1
20120024530 Todd Feb 2012 A1
20120067646 Savage Mar 2012 A1
20120160567 Belew et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120325555 Jette et al. Dec 2012 A1
20130000908 Walters et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130032349 Alekseenko Feb 2013 A1
20130062125 Savage Mar 2013 A1
20130213716 Perry et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130220606 Yhuel et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130233537 McEwen-King et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130304444 Strobel et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130341029 Roberts et al. Dec 2013 A1
20140096950 Pyecroft et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140096966 Freitag Apr 2014 A1
20140102708 Purkis et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140144623 Pyecroft et al. May 2014 A1
20140340082 Yang et al. Nov 2014 A1
20150007988 Ayasse Jan 2015 A1
20150096748 West Apr 2015 A1
20150107825 Miller et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150218925 Lecampion et al. Aug 2015 A1
20150337613 Belew et al. Nov 2015 A1
20150356403 Storm, Jr. Dec 2015 A1
20160053597 Brown et al. Feb 2016 A1
20160115772 Graham et al. Apr 2016 A1
20160131787 Quirein et al. May 2016 A1
20160153239 Randall Jun 2016 A1
20160160619 Randall Jun 2016 A1
20160215581 Ingraham et al. Jul 2016 A1
20160281480 Pyecroft et al. Sep 2016 A1
20160312587 Montaron et al. Oct 2016 A1
20170030180 Maurer Feb 2017 A1
20170204713 Bell et al. Jul 2017 A1
20180023375 Potapenko et al. Jan 2018 A1
20180112468 Savage et al. Apr 2018 A1
20180163122 Panga et al. Jun 2018 A1
20180306017 Savage Oct 2018 A1
20180328118 Morse et al. Nov 2018 A1
20190017358 Morse et al. Jan 2019 A1
20200157901 Cardon et al. May 2020 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (30)
Number Date Country
102504292 Jun 2012 CN
105349166 Feb 2016 CN
2631422 Aug 2013 EP
2672409 Dec 2013 EP
2198119 Oct 2017 EP
2406863 Apr 2005 GB
9113177 Sep 1991 WO
9420727 Sep 1994 WO
0046484 Aug 2000 WO
03050377 Jun 2003 WO
2004046494 Jun 2004 WO
2005090747 Sep 2005 WO
2009096805 Aug 2009 WO
2009157812 Dec 2009 WO
2013019390 Feb 2013 WO
2015089458 Jun 2015 WO
2016138005 Sep 2016 WO
2017074722 May 2017 WO
2017078989 May 2017 WO
2018049311 Mar 2018 WO
2018049367 Mar 2018 WO
2018049368 Mar 2018 WO
2019014160 Jan 2019 WO
2019014161 Jan 2019 WO
2019168885 Sep 2019 WO
2019241454 Dec 2019 WO
2019241455 Dec 2019 WO
2019241456 Dec 2019 WO
2019241457 Dec 2019 WO
2019241458 Dec 2019 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (12)
Entry
Alekseenko, O. P., Potapenko, D.I., Chemy, S.G., Esipov, D.V., Kuranakov, D.S., Lapin, V.N. “3-D Modeling of fracture initiation from perforated non-cemented wellbore”, SPE J., vol. 18, No. 3, 589-600, 2013.
Alekseenko O.P. , Potapenko D.I. , Kuranakov D.S., Lapin V.N., Cherny S.G., and Esipov D.V. “3D Modeling of Fracture Initiation from Cemented Perforated Wellbore”, presented at 19th European Conference on Fracture, Kazan, Russia, Aug. 26-31, 2012.
Potyondy, “Simulating stress corrosion with a bonded-particlle model for rock”, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, vol. 44, Issue 5, Jul. 2007, pp. 677-691.
Atkinson et al., “Acoustic Emission During Stress Corrosion Cracking in Rocks”, Earthquake Prediction: An International Review, vol. 4, pp. 605-616, 1981.
Wikipedia.org, “Wood's metal”, edited May 4, 2019, Accessed Jul. 3, 2019; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wood%27s_metal.
Pinto, I.S.S. et al., “Biodegradable chelating agents for industrial, domestic, and agricultural applications—a review”, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2014, 21, pp. 11893-11906.
Office Action received in U.S. Appl. No. 16/629,992 dated Apr. 21, 2021, 53 pages.
Office Action received in U.S. Appl. No. 16/629,992 dated Jan. 18, 2022, 11 pages.
Office Action issued in Eurasian Patent Application No. 201991640 dated Nov. 17, 2021, 4 pages with English translation.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 16/332,418 dated Nov. 29, 2021, 12 pages.
Office Action issued in Kuwait patent application No. KW/P/2019/221 dated Oct. 13, 2021, 6 pages.
2nd Office Action issued in Chinese patent application 201880014781.6 dated Oct. 22, 2021, 23 pages with English Translation.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20210131242 A1 May 2021 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
62442240 Jan 2017 US