Resilient construction member, especially a unitary construction member

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6615559
  • Patent Number
    6,615,559
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, April 4, 2001
    23 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, September 9, 2003
    20 years ago
Abstract
A resiliently flexible construction beam includes a pair of lateral flange portions and a web extending therebetween, preferably, but not necessarily, so as to present a cross-sectional profile corresponding to commonly used construction beam members (e.g., 2″×4″ or 2″×6″). The resilience of the beam helps to attenuate sound transmission through the beam from one lateral member to the other. In particular, in a wall frame, beams according to the present invention are mounted at opposite ends thereof to end plates. In one example, the end plates include slits into which the webs of the beams can be received. The resilient web according to the present invention is conveniently made from a unitary piece of material such as, for example, steel.
Description




TECHNICAL FIELD AND INDUSTRIAL APPLICABILITY OF THE INVENTION




The present invention relates to members used in construction, especially in applications where sound attenuation and sound isolation is important. In particular, the present invention relates to construction members used to construct building structures in which sound transmission from one room to another is to be prevented or reduced. In particular, the present invention relates to construction members having a unitary, or “one-piece” form, especially those made from metallic materials including, but not limited to, steel.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




Standard wall frame systems including a plurality of interconnected individual studs have long been used to construct walls. Also, in general, it is conventionally known to resiliently mount a wall or ceiling in order to isolate sound or attenuate transmission therethrough.




U.S. Pat. No. 3,445,975 to Nelsson discloses a partition in which first and second lath panels are held against a metallic stud, channel, or furring member by a clip fastener. One portion of the stud, channel, or furring member is cantilevered away from the portion at which the lath panels are clipped thereto. According to Nelsson, this permits the free portion of the stud, channel, or furring member to flex as the lath panels mechanically respond to sound waves incident thereon. The remainder of the structure dampens this surface movement, reducing sound transmission to the opposite surface of the partition.




U.S. Pat. No. 3,324,615 to Zinn discloses a construction member having a plurality of laterally extending supporting tabs by which wallboard segments are resiliently mounted.




U.S. Pat. No. 3,046,620 to Tvorik et al. discloses a ceiling hanger member whereby a furring strip (to which a ceiling member is attached) is resiliently attached to a joist, such that the weight of the furring strip and ceiling member resiliently separates the furring strip from the joist.




Another known method of sound attenuation is to build a wall frame in which individual studs are laterally staggered relative to a toe plate and head plate. Therefore, alternate studs are used to mount wall board on respective sides of the frame so that a given stud is spaced away from one of wall boards.




Unfortunately, the foregoing conventional methods of noise attenuation are problematic in that they generally move away from basic construction methods and thereby increase complexity and cost. For example, they require additional parts (such as Tvorik et al. and Nelsson) or specially made parts (such as the channel member with specially formed support tabs, as in Zinn). The staggered stud arrangement necessarily results in a thicker wall partition which reduces the area of the room whose walls are framed in this manner, and increases the cost of the toe and head plates.




In addition, nail fasteners generally cannot be used with metal members, thereby undesirably restricting available construction methods.




Finally, a standard wall frame system must generally be completely torn down to put a conventional sound attenuating systems into place. It would be therefore desirable to be able to retrofit a standard wall frame system so as to increase its sound attenuation characteristics.




In addition to the devices for sound attenuation described hereinabove, a wood I-beam is commercially available (e.g., under the brand name “BCI Advantage” from Boise Cascade Corporation) that comprises a pair of wood members with a rigid wooden panel extending therebetween. However, because the wooden panel is essentially non-resilient, this I-beam offers little or no sound attenuation benefit.




Commonly owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/209,308 is directed to a resilient construction member comprising a pair of spaced apart lateral members and a resilient web extending between the lateral members. A frame system using such members is also disclosed. The resilience provided by the resilient web advantageously attenuates sound transmission across the construction beam member.




Commonly owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/338,892 is directed to a construction beam member of the type generally disclosed in application Ser. No. 09/209,308, but in which one or more resilient webs are provided with one or more spacer structures. In this manner, the respective lateral members are easily oriented relative to the web, in a manner generally known in the construction art as “self-jigging.” This configuration is particularly suitable for retrofitting a preexisting frame structure (made from single studs) so as to create, after the fact, a frame comprising resilient construction members according to the, present invention. The application discloses providing a single lateral member having one or more resilient webs thereon. The one or more resilient webs include spacer structures so as to facilitate orientation of the lateral member/web(s) relative to a preexisting stud.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




The present invention is therefore most generally directed to a construction member that relies on resilient flexibility in order to attenuate sound transmission therethrough, but also more closely conforms to conventional building members in order to minimize or eliminate the need for any special handling or the like in use.




In particular, the present invention is directed to a construction beam member which are comparable in size to conventional wood beams (e.g., 2″×4″ or 2″×6″). The beam comprises a pair of spaced lateral members having at least one resilient web extending therebetween. The web is preferably relatively stiff, but permits a slight flexure between the lateral members. The lateral members are preferably, but not necessarily, made from an easily workable material such as wood.




In addition, the web is preferably, but not necessarily, provided with one or more spacers so as to facilitate the arrangement of the respective lateral members relative to each other and relative to the web. In part, this facilitates the assembly of the lateral members relative to each other and relative to the lateral web so as to obtain a beam member according to the present invention:




In a particular embodiment of the present invention, a retrofit system comprising one lateral member having a resilient web attached thereto is provided. The resilient web is provided with one or more spacers so that the one lateral member having the resilient web attached thereto can be easily positioned relative to a respective beam in a standard wall frame construction, thereby imparting the sound attenuation benefits of a frame using resilient construction beams without needing to completely tear down the original structure. In this arrangement, respective beams in the standard wall frame act as the other lateral member of the beam according to the present invention.




In one embodiment of the present invention, in accordance with the foregoing, the resilient web is made from a unitary piece of material. In one form, the beam has an x-shaped cross-section. The respective ends of the “x” are attached to the respective lateral members in a known manner. Furthermore, the resilient web formed in this manner may include spacers, as discussed above, to facilitate orientation of the respective lateral members relative to the resilient web. Moreover, the x-shaped resilient web may be used in combination with one lateral member, such that the other side of the resilient web may be used to retrofit a beam in a standard wall frame construction, as discussed above.




In yet another embodiment, the construction beam member according to the present invention is made from a single piece of resiliently rigid material, such as bent steel. The beam member includes at least one flange member (usually two), and a web extending therefrom. The beam member according to this embodiment of the present invention (especially when a metal material is used) is particularly suitable for applications when conventional C-shaped steel studs are to be replaced so as to provide greater sound attenuation benefit.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS




The present invention will be described in detail hereinbelow, with reference to the drawings appended hereto, in which:





FIG. 1

is a partial perspective view of an end of a construction beam according to the present invention;





FIG. 2

is an end view of a beam according to the present invention;





FIG. 3

is a plan view of a beam according to a second embodiment of the present invention;





FIG. 4

is a perspective view of an example of a resilient web for linking lateral members in a beam according to the present invention;





FIG. 5

is a partial perspective view of a framework for mounting wallboard or the like, utilizing beams according to the present invention;





FIG. 6

is a partial perspective view of a beam according to a third embodiment of the present invention;





FIG. 7

is a plan view of a beam according to the embodiment of the present invention shown in

FIG. 6

;





FIG. 8

is a plan view of a variant of the beam shown in

FIG. 7

;





FIG. 9

is a perspective view of a retrofit assembly including a lateral member and a web, according to a fourth embodiment of the present invention;





FIG. 10

is a cross-sectional view of a construction member according to a fifth embodiment of the present invention shown in

FIG. 9

;





FIG. 11

is a plan view of a resilient web according to a sixth embodiment of,the present invention;





FIG. 12

is a front perspective view of the resilient web illustrated in

FIG. 11

;





FIG. 13

is a front elevational view of a resilient construction member according to the sixth embodiment of the present invention;





FIG. 14

is an end view of a resilient construction member according to the sixth embodiment of the present invention;





FIG. 15



a


is a partial perspective view of a resilient construction member according to a seventh embodiment of the present invention;





FIG. 15



b


is a cross-sectional view of the resilient construction member according to the seventh embodiment of the present invention in situ;





FIG. 15



c


is a partial perspective view of the resilient construction member according to the seventh embodiment of the present invention in situ;





FIG. 15



d


is a partial perspective view of an end plate associated F with a resilient construction member according to the seventh embodiment;





FIG. 16



a


is a partial perspective view of a resilient construction member according to a eighth embodiment of the present invention;





FIG. 16



b


is a cross-sectional view of the resilient construction member according to the eighth embodiment of the present invention in situ;





FIG. 16



c


is a partial perspective view of the resilient construction member according to the eighth embodiment of the present invention in situ;





FIG. 16



d


is a partial perspective view of an end plate associated with a resilient construction member according to the eighth embodiment;





FIG. 17



a


is a partial perspective view of a resilient construction member according to a ninth embodiment of the present invention;





FIG. 17



b


is a cross-sectional view of the resilient construction member according to the ninth embodiment of the present invention in situ;





FIG. 17



c


is a partial perspective view of the resilient construction member according to the ninth embodiment of the present invention in situ;





FIG. 17



d


is a partial perspective view of an end plate associated with a resilient construction member according to the ninth embodiment;





FIG. 18

is a cross-sectional view of an end plate arrangement corresponding to the seventh through ninth embodiments;





FIG. 19

is a cross-sectional view of a conventional double-wall framing arrangement, e.g., used to effect a physical break between adjacent floor assemblies;





FIGS. 20



a


-


20




c


are perspective views of an end plate and two resilient construction members according to tenth and eleventh embodiments of the present invention; and





FIGS. 21



a


and


21




b


are perspective views of the resilient construction members of the tenth and eleventh embodiments of the present invention mounted with respect to the end plate shown in

FIG. 20



a.













DETAILED DESCRIPTION AND PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS OF THE PRESENT INVENTION





FIGS. 1 and 2

illustrate a portion of a beam


100


according to the present invention. In general, beam


100


comprises lateral members


102


and


104


with a web


106


spanning therebetween.




Lateral members


102


,


104


are generally (but not always, as discussed below) rectangular or squared in cross-sectional profile and preferably have at least the same thickness y (see FIG.


2


). Moreover, lateral beams


102


,


104


are preferably identical so that each has the same width, proportionately spaced with web


106


therebetween so as to present an overall beam width x. Lateral members


102


,


104


are preferably (but not necessarily) identical in shape so as to facilitate manufacture of beam


100


from one source of stock.




Accordingly, beam


100


can present a cross section having a major dimension x and minor dimension y corresponding to any standard beam size (e.g., 2″×4″, 2″×6″, and so on, without limitation).




According to the present invention, lateral members


102


,


104


are elongate rigid members. Accordingly, a variety of suitably rigid materials could be used. However, lateral members


102


,


104


are preferably (but not exclusively) made from wood, (in part, in keeping with an intent of the present invention to present a construction member very similar to those conventionally used in the art). Wood is also desirable because it can be worked, generally, in more ways than comparable metal members (e.g., it can be easily cut, driven with nails or screws, etc.). Not only can continuous lumber be used, but composite materials, such as plywood or wood particle board can be used. In addition, finger jointed wood members can be used according to the. present invention. A plastic material reinforced with glass fibers may also be used in accordance with the present invention.




Web


106


is made from a relatively rigid material that has some flexibility. If web


106


is relatively too flexible, lateral members


102


,


104


have too much relative freedom of movement and beam


100


is no longer, overall, a rigid member. If web


106


is relatively too stiff, then the benefits of sound isolation/attenuation are lost. Generally, web


106


may be made from any suitably stiff and resilient material, including (without limitation) rubber, asphalt, plastic or other resilient polymeric material.




In one example of the present invention, web


106


is made from galvanized


22


gauge steel. As seen in

FIG. 4

, web


106


includes edge portions


106




a


and an intermediate portion


106




b.


Edge portions


106




a


are embedded in lateral members


102


,


104


, and intermediate portion


106




b


extends obliquely between lateral members


102


,


104


. However, intermediate portion


106




b


may, most generally, extend between lateral members


102


,


104


in any orientation so long as flexure between lateral members


102


,


104


is relatively easy (compared to, for example, an intermediate portion extending straight across the gap between lateral members


102


,


104


, which does not readily flex). The use of galvanized steel as described here may offer additional ancillary benefits, such as improved fire safety protection.




Edge portions


106




a


are embedded in lateral members


102


,


104


in any conventional manner. One possible method (not illustrated) is to form grooves in lateral members


102


,


104


that are wider than the thickness of edge portions


106




a.


Once edge portions


106




a


are suitably disposed in the respective grooves, additional strips of material (such as wood) are pressed into the remaining space in the grooves, such that edge portions


106




a


are wedged into place and retained in the grooves.




Web


106


may extend continuously substantially the entire length of lateral members


102


,


104


. However, when beams


100


are used in construction, it is useful to provide a plurality of spaced apart webs


106


, such that piping, wiring and the like can be passed through the openings between webs


106


(see FIG.


3


).




Whether one or a plurality of webs


106


are provided, it is specifically contemplated that beams


100


are provided in standardized lengths (e.g., 8′) as seen in FIG.


3


and can be cut down as required.




As mentioned above, it is an important feature of the present invention to provide a construction member that can be used like conventional construction beams. Accordingly,

FIG. 5

is a partial perspective view of a frame work (as might be used for walls in a building).




As seen in

FIG. 5

, beams


100




a,




100




b


are mounted as studs on a laterally extending beam (i.e., a head plate or toe plate)


100




c.


(Another laterally extending beam (not shown) is provided at the other end of beams


100




a,




100




b.


) The structure of each of beams


100




a


-


100




c


is in accordance with the description of the present invention hereinabove, and will not be repeated here. Attention is drawn to the manner in which lateral members


102




a


and


102




b


and


104




a


and


104




b


are mounted with respect to lateral members


102




c


and


104




c,


respectively, with nails, screws or any other conventional fasteners (not shown here). Accordingly, it can be appreciated that one side of the frame (i.e., lateral members


102




a


-


102




c


) is resiliently separated by way of respective webs


106


′,


106


″, and


106


′″ from the other side of the frame (i.e., lateral members


104




a


-


104




c


). Accordingly, sound impinging on a wall member mounted on one side of the frame is attenuated upon transmission to the other side of the frame because of the resilience of webs


106


′,


106


″, and


106


′″.




Furthermore, it is possible to resiliently mount a wall so that it acts like a diaphragmatic sound absorber. In particular, only one “side” of the frame assembly (e.g., lateral member


104




c


and/or lateral members


104




a,




104




b


) is fixed to the surrounding building structure, and the other side of the frame assembly has wall board or the like mounted thereon (i.e., on lateral members


102




a,




102




b


), without attachment to the surrounding structure. The wall is therefore mounted on the “free” or “floating” side of the studs.




A particularly beneficial wall board structure is disclosed in commonly owned and co-pending application Ser. No. 09/260,272, and comprises, generally, first and second dry wall layers with a visco-elastic material layer interposed therebetween. In particular, a visco-elastic asphalt material is useful with such a wall board structure.




In order to enhance the effect of decoupling the one side of the wall frame from the surrounding structure, it is desirable to provide a soft gasket (made from, for example, foam rubber) between the lateral beam


100




c


and the surrounding structure (i.e., the ceiling and/or floor). This promotes relatively free movement of the one side of the frame that is not fixed to the surrounding building structure.




To further enhance the effect of decoupling the wall from the surrounding structure, it is preferable to provide flexible joint material at junctions between wall board segments (not illustrated here), including at corners of rooms. Therefore the wall surface is visually continuous, but physically decoupled, in order to take advantage of the resultant sound attenuation effects.




Also, it is very desirable to provide additional sound and/or thermal insulation in the spaces defined by the studs and end plates. Such insulation can be of any conventional type, including blown, rolled or batting, foam board, etc. The addition of such insulation enhances sound attenuation effects resulting from the present invention.





FIGS. 6 and 7

are a partial perspective view and a partial plan view, respectively, of beam


200


, in accordance with another embodiment of the present invention.




The design concept underlying beam


200


is fundamentally similar to that of beam


100


. Like before, lateral members


202


and


204


are provided, and are resiliently spaced apart from each other by web


206


. Unlike web


106


in beam


100


, however, web


206


is not embedded in lateral members


202


,


204


. Instead, web


206


is fixed (by any conventional means, such as nails


205


, as shown in

FIGS. 6 and 7

) relative to opposite faces of lateral members


202


,


204


along the major dimension of the beam cross section.




As in the first embodiment, a plurality of spaced apart webs


206


may be provided along the length of beam


200


(see, for example, FIG.


7


).




Web


206


is preferably made from a material that is slightly more flexible than that used for web


106


, such as


24


gauge galvanized steel.




Initial comparative testing has been undertaken comparing the sound attenuation characteristics of conventional construction members versus beam


100


and beam


200


, respectively. Initial results indicate that beam


100


has greater than expected attenuation characteristics, and that beam


200


should have even better attenuation performance than beam


100


. This latter effect is thought to be caused by the shape and orientation of web


206


, which more easily permits a normal compression between lateral members


202


,


204


.




In addition, as a variation of the embodiment illustrated in

FIG. 7

, the plurality of webs are alternately arranged so that the portion of the webs extending obliquely thereacross alternates (thereby crossing each other, as seen from an end of beam


200


) (see FIG.


8


). In

FIG. 8

, beam


300


comprises lateral beams


302


and


304


, and includes a plurality of first webs


306




a


which are spaced from and alternate with a plurality of second webs


306




b.


Accordingly, respective intermediate portions of webs


306




a


and


306




b


criss-cross as seen from an end of beam


300


.




Inasmuch as sound that one seeks to attenuate or isolate is typically physically unique relative to particular environments (e.g., a home theater room, a movie theater, a machine shop, a recording studio, a concert hall), it is an important feature of the present invention to provide a construction member that can be “tuned” in order to tailor its sound attenuation properties for a specific environment. In other words, a beam according to the present invention can be specifically manufactured so that its resilient properties (in terms of, for example, spring constant) are made to correspond to a particular kind of sound (especially in terms of its frequency) so that sound attenuation can be maximized.




Such “tuning” can be accomplished by varying the thickness of web


106


,


206


, either -uniformly or variably over the entire area of web


106


,


206


. In addition, notches, slits, or other openings can be formed in web


106


,


206


to control the resilience of web


106


,


206


in accordance with known principles of physics. In addition, suitably sized perforations or openings in a continuous web can be formed so as to create a tunable Helmholtz resonator effect between adjacent cavities defined between studs in the framework illustrated in FIG.


5


. By altering the number and/or size of the perforations or openings, a resultant Helmholtz resonant frequency can be controlled, at which attenuation of sound at that frequency is maximized. It should be noted that this is different from reference to a plurality of webs as shown in

FIGS. 3

,


7


, and


8


.




It can therefore be appreciated that adjoining rooms may be constructed (e.g., adjoining musical studios) such that each room can be tuned in accordance with its respective mode of use. In particular, this may be accomplished by constructed “double wall” framework, where two frames of the structure illustrated in

FIG. 5

are constructed face-to-face, such that the respective opposing sides of the frames are fixed to the surrounding building structure and their respective opposite sides are left free floating in the manner discussed above.




Assembly of lateral members and resilient webs according to the present invention is facilitated by providing at least one spacer on the resilient web or webs to orient the lateral members relative to the resilient web.





FIG. 10

is a schematic cross-sectional view of a beam


400


, somewhat similar to beams


200


and


300


in

FIGS. 6-8

. Here again, beam


400


comprises lateral members


402


and


404


, and a resilient web


406


extending therebetween.




Resilient web


406


is attached to opposite facing sides of lateral members


402


and


404


, respectively, by, for example, staples


408


(although any conventional attachment method can be used, including, without limitation, screws, nails, bolts, and the like).




Resilient web includes a first portion


406




a,


a second portion


406




b


bent at an angle to first portion


406




a,


and a third portion


406




c


bent at an angle to second portion


406




b


and generally parallel with first portion


406




a.


Generally, lateral members


402


and


404


are received in the bends defined by the first and second portions


406




a


and


406




b,


and by the second and third portions


406




b


and


406




c,


as shown in FIG.


10


.




It is a particular feature of this embodiment to provide a spacer


410


(


412


) on at least one of first and third portions


406




a


and


406




c


to space a respective at least one of the lateral members


402


and


404


away from second portion


406




b


of the resilient web


406


. In general, the provision of spacers


410


(


412


) allows easy assembly of the lateral members and the resilient web (known in the art as “self-jigging”). In particular, the provision of spacers


410


,


412


prevents the respective lateral members


402


,


404


from being placed in abutting relation to second portion


406




b.


If such an arrangement were to be had, then the abutment of the resilient members against the second portion


406




b


would undesirably retard the resilient sound-damping characteristics of the resilient web


406


.




It is noted that the slight spacing shown in

FIG. 10

between lateral members


402


and


404


and the resilient web


406


is for clarity of illustration only and is not necessarily illustrative of the present invention.




The arrangement of the present invention illustrated in

FIG. 10

can be extended desirably to an apparatus and method for retrofitting standard beam members, especially beam members already assembled into a standard frame arrangement.





FIG. 9

illustrates a retrofitting assembly


500


comprising a lateral beam


502


, to which at least one resilient web


506


is attached by staples


508


or the like. Each resilient web


506


as shown includes spacers


510


and


512


. However, the provision of spacers


512


is most important here. It is emphasized that assembly


500


in and of itself is not a construction member per se, but is used in conjunction with standard beams in order to provide a resilient beam arrangement.




As before, resilient web


506


may be made from any suitably resilient material, including (without limitation) metal, rubber, asphalt, plastic, or other resilient polymeric material. In one example, spacers


510


,


512


are protruding tabs formed integrally with the resilient web


506


. In a specific example, spacers


510


,


512


may be punch-formed into the material of the resilient web


506


(especially, but not necessarily only, where the resilient web


506


is made from metal). The punch-formed portions can simply be turned away from the web material as needed to form the required spacers.




In the arrangement illustrated in

FIG. 9

, it is especially important to provide spacers


512


as shown. The assembly


500


is arranged relative to a single standard beam such as a 2″×4″ (not shown here) and fastened thereto (again, by staples, screws, nails, bolts, or any known and suitable fastener). The arrangement of the assembly


500


relative to a standard beam is made simple by the provision of spacers


512


, especially where assembly


500


is coupled to a standard beam forming part of a conventional framework.




In addition, the resilient webs


506


may be provided in an alternating arrangement, so that opposite sides of lateral member


502


are attached to respective resilient webs


506


, as seen in

FIG. 9

(this is similar to the arrangement illustrated in FIG.


8


and discussed above). With this arrangement, the assembly


500


may be even more easily arranged relative to a standard beam by orienting the assembly


500


so that respective free ends of the resilient webs


506


are arranged on opposite sides of the standard beam. Although the alternating arrangement of resilient webs


506


seen in

FIG. 9

is beneficial (for reasons similar to those discussed above relative to FIG.


8


), it is not necessary according to the present invention. The present invention is certainly operable with the resilient webs


506


all arranged in like manner along lateral member


502


.




As with the other embodiments discussed above, lateral member


502


may be rectangular or squared in cross-section, and may preferably be made from continuous lumber or a composite wood material, as well as plastic reinforced with glass fibers.




In one example of the present invention, the spacers


410


,


412


,


510


,


512


may be arranged to space the respective lateral members about 0.25 inches from the portion of the resilient web spanning the space between the lateral members. However, the present invention is not restricted to a specific spacing, except for that sufficient to prevent the respective lateral members from fully abutting the resilient web, as discussed above.




One of ordinary skill will appreciate that the resilient web


506


may be shaped so as to be attached to lateral members of different profiles. In one example, a lateral member


502


which is rectangular or squared in cross-section attached to the resilient web


506


may be used so as to be attached to a conventional rigid I-beam (discussed above relative to the related art) or vice versa.




It will be appreciated that the assembly


500


as seen in

FIG. 9

can been seen as somewhat analogous to a conventional resilient channel. However, at least because of the self-jigging aspect of the assembly


500


(due to the provision of spacers), the assembly


500


is much easier to work with compared with resilient channel structures.





FIG. 11

is a plan view of a resilient web


600


according to sixth embodiment of the present invention. Resilient web


600


is characteristically made from a single piece of material formed so as to generally have a x-shape in cross-section. In general, resilient web includes first and second main portions


602


,


604


which are angled relative to one another (see, for example, FIG.


12


). Each main portion


602


,


604


has first and second end portions (


602




a,




602




b,




604




a,




604




b


) adapted to be attached to lateral members


608


(see, for example,

FIGS. 13 and 14

) so as to form a construction member according to the present invention. For example, the first and second end portions of each main portion may be bent relative to their respective main portions at fold; lines


606


, whereby the lateral members


608


are arranged between generally parallel but unaligned first portions


602




a,




604




a


and second portions


602




b,




604




b


(see, again, for example, FIGS.


13


and


14


).




Resilient web


600


may, for example, be made from a flat piece of metal (for example, steel). Longitudinal cuts


610




a


and


610




b


are formed generally down the midwidth of the piece of metal, all the way to the respective longitudinal ends of the piece of metal. Longitudinal cuts


610




a


and


610




b


may or may not be aligned with each other. Furthermnore, longitudinal cuts


610




a


and


610




b


do not meet (lest the piece of metal be completely severed), but end at a pivot point or line


610




c.


In forming the resilient web, first and second main portions


602


and


604


are rotated relative to each other about a pivot axis lying in the plane of the originally flat piece of metal and extending through the pivot point


610




c.


Although steel was specified above as a material of manufacture, any suitable metallic material may be used instead. Indeed, any (metallic or non-metallic) material that is similar in bending stiffness to steel may be used, as long as its physical characteristics are amenable as a whole to the invention disclosed herein (especially with regard to resilient flexibility). In addition, the first and second end portions of each main portion


602


,


604


may be bent as needed so as to be attachable to lateral members


608


. As seen, by way of example in

FIG. 14

, the respective end portions are attached to lateral members


608


conventional fasteners such as nails


612


, but alternatively including, without limitation, screws, rivets, staples, liquid or solid adhesive, or any combination of one or more conventional fasteners.




Instead of cutting and bendingly forming a metal plate, as discussed above, resilient web


600


may be molded from any suitable thermoplastic material, as long as that material possesses resilient properties that make it amenable as a whole to the invention disclosed herein (especially with regard to resilient flexibility).




Like the lateral members disclosed elsewhere herein, lateral members


608


are preferably made from any easily workable material, especially, but not only, wood and various formed wood products. Plastic material reinforced with, for example, glass fiber, is also suitable.




The resilient web of the sixth embodiment, as seen in

FIGS. 11-14

, is conveniently made using a conventional method of manufacture (e.g., using conventional metal stamping or conventional molding). From an acoustical perspective, a construction member using the resilient web of the sixth embodiment allows linear relative motion between the lateral members, but resists rotational or lateral relative motion.




Although not specifically illustrated herein, resilient web


600


may be provided with one or more spacers as illustrated in, for example,

FIGS. 9 and 10

, from which comparable benefits are gained. Also, although not specifically illustrated herein, the wall board structure disclosed in commonly owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/260,272 is also desirable for use in connection with a construction member using the resilient web of this sixth embodiment.




As disclosed elsewhere herein, it is beneficial to provide at least one opening in resilient web


600


so as to provide a Helmholtz resonator effect.




It will be appreciated that resilient web


600


may be used with only one lateral member


608


, in a manner similar to the arrangement illustrated in FIG.


9


. The combination of resilient web


600


and one lateral member


608


can therefore be mounted on a stud in a preexisting wall frame so as to provide retrofit sound attenuation benefits. As with the arrangement in

FIG. 9

, one or more spacers (similar to spacers


512


) may be provided to facilitate arrangement of the web/lateral member combination relative to a stud in the preexisting wall frame.





FIGS. 15



a


-


15




d


illustrate a resilient construction member


700


according to a seventh embodiment of the present invention. Construction member


700


is characteristically made from a single material portion that is formed into the requisite shape. Preferably, the single material portion is a metallic material, such as steel, but can also be, for example and without limitation, fiberglass, resin, etc.




As seen in, for example,

FIG. 15



a,


construction member


700


has a beam form. It is:desirable, but not necessary, to provide construction member


700


with width and thickness dimensions that are comparable to conventional beam construction members, such as 2″×4″, 2″×6″, etc.




Generally, construction member


700


has a form similar to the other embodiments of the present invention. That is, construction member includes, broadly, lateral flange portions


702


with a web


708


extending transversely therebetween. However, as mentioned above, construction member


700


is made from a single material portion, such as steel, that is formed into the requisite beam shape. In the case of metallic materials such as steel, the material can be, for example, bent into shape using convention metal fornming processes. If other materials are used, suitable conventional methods such as molding or extruding can be used.




At least one of the lateral flange portions


702


includes a first subportion


704


extending, most generally, in a first direction skewed relative to the plane of web


708


. In the example illustrated in

FIGS. 15



a


-


15




d,


first subportion


704


extends generally perpendicular to web


708


at, for example, a lateral edge of web


708


. Second subportion


706


extends in the opposite direction as first subportion


704


, and generally parallel therewith. In this particular example, second subportion


706


is also generally perpendicular to web


708


. Second subportion


706


extends beyond the plane of web


708


to an extent generally corresponding to the overall thickness of construction member


700


. The first subportion


704


and second subportion


706


may be spaced from each other by a third spacer subportion


710


extending between first subportion


704


and second subportion


706


in a direction, for example, generally parallel with web


708


. Finally, second subportion


706


may include a fourth subportion


712


along a distal edge thereof. Fourth subportion


712


may be turned laterally inward (i.e., towards the other flange portion) as illustrated in, for example,

FIG. 15



a,


or laterally outward (i.e., away from the other flange portion) as illustrated in, for example,

FIG. 16



a.






Although

FIG. 15



a


shows the first and second subportions


704


,


706


of the respective flange portions


702


extending in the same directions, the first and second subportions


704


,


706


of each flange portion


702


could be provided so as to extend in mirror-reverse directions.





FIGS. 15



b


and


15




d


illustrate the manner in which member


700


can be mounted using an end plate (sometimes known in the art as a footplate)


750


. As seen in

FIG. 15



d,


an end of member


700


is mounted with respect to end plate


750


by inserting web


708


into one of a plurality of appropriately sized slits


752


formed therein. Specifically, as seen in cross-section, end plate


750


includes first and second base or feet portions


754


, and a raised central portion


756


therebetween. Slits


752


are formed in central portion


756


in any desired interval corresponding to a desired spacing between members


700


(for example,


8


inches apart). Preferably, each slit


752


is just wide enough to somewhat snugly receive web


708


therein.




The cross-sectional profile of end plate


750


also helps to attenuate sound transmission between rooms, as illustrated in FIG.


18


.

FIG. 18

illustrates in cross-section a construction between two rooms


800


and


800


′. Each room includes floors


802


and


802


′ and a wall system


850


therebetween. Sound transmission between room


800


and room


800


′ can be attenuated in part by providing a gap


804


between floors


802


and


802


′. This interrupts a sound transmission path (


2


) that would be available if a contiguous floor were provided.




In conventional wall systems as illustrated in

FIG. 19

, it can be seen that in order to achieve a physical break it would be necessary to utilize a double-wall arrangement. This approach would be expensive and could diminish available dwelling space.




The end plate


750


according to the present invention, however, provides a comparatively much longer transmission path (


1


) through the cross-sectional periphery of central portion


756


, as seen in FIG.


18


. This extended transmission path facilitates the dissipation of vibrational energy over its length, and thus, in effect, allows the physical break in the flooring assembly to function as an interruption of sound transmission through the flooring itself. The economic advantage of this approach over the double-wall arrangement would be significant in terms of construction cost & additional available dwelling space.





FIG. 15



b


is a plan view of a member


700


mounted with respect to an end plate


750


, similar to the arrangement seen in

FIG. 15



d.


Each member


700


may be fixed relative to end plate


750


by any known and suitable method including, without limitation, one or more of fastening members (such as nails, screws, and rivets), welding, and adhesives and the like. As seen in

FIG. 15



b,


for example, a fastening member (such as a nail, screw, or rivet)


760


can be driven through first and second subportions


704


,


706


into a sidewall of central portion


756


.




Also,

FIG. 15



b


illustrates a wall member


762


mounted on a second subportion


706


of one of the flange portions of member


700


. Such mounting can be accomplished in any known and acceptable manner, including without limitation, fastening members, adhesive, etc. It is particularly desirable, but not necessary, according to the present invention to mount wall member


762


only on second subportion(s)


706


of one or more members


700


so that the wall member


762


is resiliently supported in accordance with principles of the present invention discussed hereinabove.




It will be appreciated that the distance between respective flange portions


702


may be suitable to receive thermal and/or acoustic insulation therebetween. For example,

FIG. 15



c


illustrates the use of insulation batts


770


on either side of a member


700


.





FIGS. 16



a


-


16




d


and


17




a


-


17




d


are substantially similar to the present invention illustrated in

FIGS. 15



a


-


15




d,


but include construction members having different flange portion configurations. For example, as seen in

FIG. 16



a,


one flange portion


702


includes a laterally outward extending fourth subportion


712


, as discussed above. Furthermore, a fifth subportion


714


extends from fourth subportion


712


. In a particular example of the present invention, fourth subportion


712


is generally parallel with web


708


and perpendicular with fifth subportion


714


. The other flange portion


702


in

FIG. 16



a


has the same configuration as in

FIGS. 15



a


-


15




d,


so a repeated explanation of that structure is omitted here.





FIGS. 17



a


-


17




d


illustrate a construction member according to the present invention having both flange portions


702


that include a fifth subportion


714


. Otherwise,

FIGS. 17



a


-


17




d


are generally similar to

FIGS. 15



a


-


15




d


and


16




a


-


16




d.







FIGS. 20



a


-


20




c


illustrate other embodiments of the present invention which in this case can be seen as an arrangement which more closely resembles that of conventional steel framing in so much that a “U” channel of specific cross section is used as the end plate, to locate and secure the top and bottom of the wall framing arrangement. In particular,

FIG. 20



a


illustrates an end plate


900


according to the present invention.

FIG. 20



b


illustrates a member


902


having one flange portion


904


, while

FIG. 20



c


illustrates a member


906


having two flange portions


908


. Member


904


can be used for exterior walls, for example, where a floating wall is needed only on one side of a frame system, whereas member


906


can be used in frames located between two rooms that both require sound attenuation such as, for example, music practice rooms, multiplex theaters, etc.




Each flange portion has a structure generally similar to the flange portions


702


of

FIG. 15



a,


including a first subportion


1000


, a second subportion


1002


, and a third subportion


1003


. Preferably, third subportion is generally perpendicular to first and second subportions


1000


,


1002


.




Each flange portion


904


,


908


can be provided with one or more openings


1006


. Openings


1006


can be sized, in accordance with well-known principles of Helmholtz resonance, to define sound-dissipating Helmholtz resonators between respective members


902


or


906


.





FIGS. 21



a


and


21




b


illustrate how members


902


and


906


can be mounted on end plate


900


in a manner illustrated in

FIGS. 21



a,


and


21




b.


An important feature to note in this arrangement is that it is important to use an end plate or “U” channel with clearance in the corners. This would ensure that the flange portions of members


902


and


906


will have the degree of freedom required to allow the entire framing structure to react to impinging sound, that is perform as a resilient structure. Recommended corner clearance would be achieved by providing a recess with a minimum lateral width of ¼ inch, and a minimum depth of {fraction (1/16)} inch.




The end plate


900


and members


902


and


906


are also preferably made from a single piece of material each, such as bent steel of a desired gauge. Other materials, such as fiberglass, resin, etc. are also usable.




Although construction members according to the present invention have been described hereinabove for wall frames and the like, they are also contemplated for use in mounting floating ceilings which are acoustically isolated from a building structure. In addition, construction members according to the present invention may also be used in floor construction.




In particular, a construction member for mounting a floating ceiling may be used by fixing one of the lateral members (or flange portions) to the building structure and fixing a ceiling member to the free floating lateral member (i.e., the lateral member not fixed to the building structure).




The use of substantially identical lateral members is contemplated according to the present invention. However, use of dissimilar lateral members is also expressly within the scope of the present invention for all embodiments. For example, one of the lateral members


102


,


104


shown in

FIG. 2

may be replaced by a conventional wood I-beam of the type described above., In particular, web


106


may be embedded in one of the flange portions of the wood I-beam, in the manner disclosed above. Similarly, webs


506


and


600


(as illustrated in

FIGS. 9 and 10

and

FIGS. 11-14

, respectively) are arranged to have end portions on opposite sides of one of the flange portions of the wood I-beam.




Although the present invention is directed primarily to construction members made from non-metal materials, the design concepts may be of interest in the manufacture of metal studs comprising a pair of metal members with a resilient web extending therebetween in accordance with the foregoing description. In particular, a metal stud using the inventive principles disclosed herein could be made from a single piece of sheet metal, formed into shape.




The present invention being thusly described, it will be obvious that the same may be varied in many ways. Such variations are not to be regarded as a departure from the spirit and scope of the invention, and all such modifications as would be obvious to one skilled in the art are intended to be included within the scope of the following claims. It is specifically noted that several embodiments are directed to particular features of the present invention. The manner in which different specific aspects of the present invention can be used in conjunction is discussed to some extent hereinabove. However, the mere fact that one particular feature disclosed herein is not expressly disclosed as being used in conjunction with another particularly disclosed feature is, alone, not meant to be limiting. It should be appreciated that the various embodiments of the present invention are meant to be interrelated such that features from each, to the extent possible, are interchangeable but in keeping with the present invention as contemplated.



Claims
  • 1. A wall system comprising:at least one beam member comprising first and second spaced apart and elongate flange portions, and a web extending therebetween, wherein at least one of said first and second spaced apart flange portions comprises at least a first subportion extending from said web in a direction skewed with respect to a plane in which said web lies, and a second subportion extending in a direction from a distal edge of said first subportion back towards said web; and an end plate including, in cross-section, first and second spaced apart feet and a raised central portion extending in a direction opposite to said first and second spaced apart feet, said central portion including at least one slit receiving said web of said at least one beam member therein.
  • 2. The system according to claim 1, wherein said central portion has a lateral width corresponding to a distance between said first and second flange portions of said at least one beam member.
  • 3. The system according to claim 1, comprising a wall member attached to said second subportion of said at least one beam member.
  • 4. The system according to claim 3, wherein said wall member is attached only to said second subportion of said at least one beam member.
  • 5. The system according to claim 3, wherein said at least one beam member is resiliently flexible, such that said wall member is resiliently supported by said at least one beam member.
  • 6. The system according to claim 1, comprising a plurality of said beam members and at least one of acoustic and thermal insulation provided in the spaces between respective said beam members.
Parent Case Info

This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/430,432 entitled “Resilient Construction Member and Retrofit System Using Same” (filed on Oct. 29, 1999 and still pending), the entire contents of which is incorporated herein by reference. U.S. application Ser. No. 09/430,432 is in turn a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/338,892 entitled “Self-Jigging Resilient Construction Member and Retrofit System Using Same” (filed on Jun. 23, 1999 and still pending), the entire contents of which is incorporated herein by reference. U.S. application Ser. No. 09/338,892 is in turn a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/209,308 entitled “Resilient Wall Stud” (filed on Dec. 11, 1998 and still pending), that entire application being also incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (45)
Number Name Date Kind
1204956 Day Nov 1916 A
RE16183 Burrell Oct 1925 E
1610578 Murphy Dec 1926 A
1729741 Heltzel Oct 1929 A
1732348 Balduf Oct 1929 A
1894933 Venzie Jan 1933 A
1946560 Wick Feb 1934 A
2026117 Balduf Dec 1935 A
2075772 Vass Mar 1937 A
2081765 Prudden May 1937 A
2187904 Hurley Jan 1940 A
2565875 Musacchia Aug 1951 A
2710335 Wong Jun 1955 A
3046620 Tvorik et al. Jul 1962 A
3229435 Olsen Jan 1966 A
3324615 Zinn Jun 1967 A
3349535 Balinski Oct 1967 A
3445975 Nelsson May 1969 A
3609933 Jahm et al. Oct 1971 A
3712846 Daniels et al. Jan 1973 A
3721050 Perina Mar 1973 A
3950912 Lundberg et al. Apr 1976 A
3999343 Roberts Dec 1976 A
4207719 Knowles Jun 1980 A
4317503 Soderquist et al. Mar 1982 A
4337287 Falkenberg Jun 1982 A
4364212 Pearson et al. Dec 1982 A
4466225 Hovind Aug 1984 A
4661392 Kapstad Apr 1987 A
4794746 Ramer Jan 1989 A
5079894 Lau Jan 1992 A
5117598 Livingston et al. Jun 1992 A
5146721 Candiracci Sep 1992 A
5157883 Meyer Oct 1992 A
5272284 Schmanski Dec 1993 A
5301487 Wiebe Apr 1994 A
5502931 Munir Apr 1996 A
5511355 Singler Apr 1996 A
5605024 Sucato et al. Feb 1997 A
5606833 Anderson Mar 1997 A
5606841 Carter, Jr. Mar 1997 A
5743058 Boomsma Apr 1998 A
5852908 Nankin Dec 1998 A
5923002 McGrath et al. Jul 1999 A
6007890 DeBlander Dec 1999 A
Foreign Referenced Citations (13)
Number Date Country
872 894 Apr 1979 BE
1122377 Apr 1982 CA
552 110 Jul 1974 CH
1 814 435 Jun 1970 DE
1 784 729 Aug 1971 DE
0 136 618 Apr 1985 EP
0 249 085 Dec 1987 EP
0 745 470 Dec 1996 EP
2 221 604 Oct 1974 FR
2 541 707 Aug 1984 FR
2575243 Jun 1986 FR
630 311 Oct 1949 GB
WO 91 02865 Mar 1991 WO
Continuation in Parts (3)
Number Date Country
Parent 09/430432 Oct 1999 US
Child 09/826131 US
Parent 09/338892 Jun 1999 US
Child 09/430432 US
Parent 09/209308 Dec 1998 US
Child 09/338892 US