Information
-
Patent Grant
-
6755003
-
Patent Number
6,755,003
-
Date Filed
Friday, December 11, 199826 years ago
-
Date Issued
Tuesday, June 29, 200420 years ago
-
Inventors
-
Original Assignees
-
Examiners
- Friedman; Carl D.
- McDermott; Kevin
Agents
- Eckert; Inger H.
- Barns; Stephen W.
- Gasaway; Maria C.
-
CPC
-
US Classifications
Field of Search
US
- 052 7291
- 052 7292
- 052 7293
- 052 7294
- 052 7295
- 052 6501
- 052 145
-
International Classifications
-
Abstract
A construction beam includes a pair of lateral members and a resilient web extending therebetween, so as to present a cross-sectional profile corresponding to commonly used construction beam members. The resilience of the web helps to attenuate sound transmission through the beam from one lateral member to the other. Ends of the resilient web are fixed to respective ones of the lateral members on opposite sides of an imaginary reference plane passing orthogonally through both of the lateral members. In particular, in a wall frame, the lateral members are mounted at opposite ends thereof to end plates consisting of other construction beams according to the present invention. When used in a frame of a building structure, the lateral members of the end plates on the same side are attached to the surrounding structure, leaving the other side of the frame resiliently free floating.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD AND INDUSTRIAL APPLICABILITY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to members used in construction, especially in applications where the importance of sound attenuation and isolation is significant. In particular, the present invention relates to construction members used to construct building structures in which sound transmission from one room to another is to be prevented or reduced.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
In general, it is conventionally known to resiliently mount a wall or ceiling in order to isolate sound or attenuate transmission therethrough.
U.S. Pat. No. 3,445,975 to Nelsson discloses a partition in which first and second lath panels are held against a metallic stud, channel, or furring member by a clip fastener. One portion of the stud, channel, or furring member is cantilevered away from the portion at which the lath panels are clipped thereto. According to Nelsson, this permits the free portion of the stud, channel, or furring member to flex as the lath panels mechanically respond to sound waves incident thereon. The remainder of the structure dampens this surface movement, reducing sound transmission to the opposite surface of the partition.
U.S. Pat. No. 3,324,615 to Zinn discloses a construction member having a plurality of laterally extending supporting tabs by which wallboard segments are resiliently mounted.
U.S. Pat. No. 3,046,620 to Tvorik et al. discloses a ceiling hanger member whereby a furring strip (to which a ceiling member is attached) is resiliently attached to a joist, such that the weight of the furring strip and ceiling member resiliently separates the furring strip from the joist.
Another known method of sound attenuation is to build a wall frame in which studs are laterally staggered relative to a toe plate and head plate. Therefore, alternate studs are used to mount wall board on respective sides of the frame so that a given stud is spaced away from one of wall boards.
Unfortunately, the foregoing conventional methods of noise attenuation are problematic in that they generally move away from basic construction methods and thereby increase complexity and cost. For example, they require additional parts (such as Tvorik et al. and Nelsson) or specially made parts (such as the channel member with specially formed support tabs, as in Zinn). The staggered stud arrangement necessarily results in a thicker wall partition which reduces the area of the room whose walls are framed in this manner, and increases the cost of the toe and head plates.
In addition, nail fasteners generally cannot be used with metal members, thereby undesirably restricting available construction methods.
In addition to the devices for sound attenuation described hereinabove, a wood I-beam is commercially available (e.g., under the brand name “BCI Advantage” from Boise Cascade Corporation) that comprises a pair of wood members with a rigid wooden panel extending therebetween. However, because the wooden panel is essentially non-resilient, this I-beam offers little or no sound attenuation benefit.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention is therefore directed to a construction member that relies on resilient flexibility in order to attenuate sound transmission therethrough, but also more closely conforms to conventional building members in order to minimize or eliminate the need for any special handling or the like in use.
In particular, the present invention is directed to a construction beam member sized comparably to conventional wood beams (for example, 2″×4″ or 2″×6″). The beam comprises a pair of spaced of lateral members having a resilient web extending therebetween. Ends of the resilient web are fixed to respective ones of the lateral members on opposite sides of an imaginary reference plane passing orthogonally through both of the lateral members. The web is preferably relatively stiff, but permits a slight flexure between the lateral members. The lateral members are preferably made from an easily workable material such as wood.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
The present invention will be described in detail hereinbelow, with reference to the drawings appended hereto, in which:
FIG. 1
is a partial perspective view of an end of a construction beam according to the present invention;
FIG. 2
is an end view of a beam according to the present invention;
FIG. 3
is a plan view of a beam according to a different embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 4
is a perspective view of an example of a linkage for linking lateral members in a beam according to the present invention;
FIG. 5
is a partial perspective view of a framework for mounting wallboard or the like, utilizing beams according to the present invention;
FIG. 6
is a partial perspective view of a beam according to yet another embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 7
is a plan view of a beam according to the embodiment of the present invention shown in
FIG. 6
; and
FIG. 8
is a plan view of a variant of the beam shown in FIG.
7
.
And
FIG. 9
is an end view of a beam according to the invention that incorporates an I-beam.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION AND PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS OF THE PRESENT INVENTION
FIGS. 1 and 2
illustrate a portion of a beam
100
according to the present invention. In general, beam
100
comprises lateral members
102
and
104
with a web
106
spanning therebetween.
FIGS. 1 and 2
depict an imaginary reference plane
108
passing orthogonally through the lateral members
102
and
104
as well as through the resilient web
106
. Ends of the resilient web
106
are fixed to the lateral members
102
and
104
on opposite sides of the imaginary reference plane
108
. Preferably, but not necessarily, the imaginary reference plane
108
is also a line of symmetry for each of the lateral members
102
and
104
. Alternatively, the imaginary reference plane
108
divides each of the lateral members
102
and
104
in substantially the same manner.
Lateral members
102
,
104
are generally squared in cross-sectional profile and have at least the same thickness y (see FIG.
2
). Moreover, lateral beams
102
,
104
are preferably identical so that each has the same width, proportionately spaced with web
106
therebetween so as to present an overall beam width x. Lateral members
102
,
104
are preferably (but not necessarily) identical in shape so as to facilitate manufacture of beam
100
from one source of stock.
The beam
100
presents a cross section having a major dimension x and minor dimension y corresponding to any standard beam size (for example, 2″×4″, 2″×6″, and so on, without limitation).
According to the present invention, lateral members
102
,
104
are elongate rigid members. Accordingly, a variety of suitably rigid materials could be used. However, lateral members
102
,
104
are preferably (but not exclusively) made from wood, (in part, in keeping with an intent of the present invention to present a construction member very similar to those conventionally used in the art). Wood is also desirable because it can be worked, generally, in more ways than comparable metal members (e.g., it can be easily cut, driven with nails or screws, etc.). Not only can continuous lumber be used, but composite materials, such as plywood or wood particle board can be used. In addition, finger jointed wood members can be used according to the present invention. A plastic material reinforced with glass fibers may also be used in accordance with the present invention.
Web
106
is made from a relatively rigid material that has some flexibility. If web
106
is relatively too flexible, lateral members
102
,
104
have too much relative freedom of movement and beam
100
is no longer, overall, a rigid member. If web
106
is relatively too stiff, then the benefits of sound isolation/attenuation are lost. Generally, web
106
may be made from any suitably stiff and resilient material, including (without limitation) rubber, asphalt, plastic or other resilient polymeric material.
In one example of the present invention, web
106
is made from galvanized
22
gauge steel. As seen in
FIG. 4
, web
106
includes edge portions
106
a
and an intermediate portion
106
b
. Edge portions
106
a
are embedded in lateral members
102
,
104
, and intermediate portion
106
b
extends obliquely between lateral members
102
,
104
. However, intermediate portion
106
b
may, most generally, extend between lateral members
102
,
104
in any orientation so long as flexure between lateral members
102
,
104
is relatively easy (compared to, for example, an intermediate portion extending straight across the gap between lateral members
102
,
104
, which does not readily flex).
It is noted that the use of galvanized steel as described here may offer additional ancillary benefits, such as improved fire safety protection.
Edge portions
106
a
are embedded in lateral members
102
,
104
in any conventional manner. One possible method (not illustrated) is to form grooves in lateral members
102
,
104
that are wider than the thickness of edge portions
106
a
. Once edge portions
106
a
are suitably disposed in the respective grooves, additional strips of material (such as wood) are pressed into the remaining space in the grooves, such that edge portions
106
a
are wedged into place and retained in the grooves.
Web
106
may extend continuously substantially the entire length of lateral members
102
,
104
. However, when beams
100
are used in construction, it is useful to provide a plurality of spaced apart webs
106
, such that piping, wiring and the like can be passed through the openings between webs
106
(see FIG.
3
).
Whether one or a plurality of webs
106
are provided, it is specifically contemplated that beams
100
are provided in standardized lengths (e.g.,
8
′) as seen in FIG.
3
and can be cut down as required.
As mentioned above, it is an important feature of the present invention to provide a construction member that can be used like conventional construction beams. Accordingly,
FIG. 5
is a partial perspective view of a frame work (as might be used for walls in a building).
As seen in
FIG. 5
, beams
100
a
,
100
b
are mounted as studs on a laterally extending beam (i.e., a head plate or toe plate)
100
c
. (Another laterally extending beam (not shown) is provided at the other end of beams
100
a
,
100
b
.) The structure of each of beams
100
a
-
100
c
is in accordance with the description of the present invention hereinabove, and will not be repeated here. Attention is drawn to the manner in which lateral members
102
a
and
102
b
and
104
a
and
104
b
are mounted with respect to lateral members
102
c
and
104
c
, respectively, with nails, screws or any other conventional fasteners (not shown here). Accordingly, it can be appreciated that one side of the frame (i.e., lateral members
102
a
-
102
c
) are resiliently separated by way of respective webs
106
′,
106
″, and
106
′″ from the other side of the frame (i.e., lateral members
104
a
-
104
c
). Accordingly, sound impinging on a wall member mounted on one side of the frame is attenuated upon transmission to the other side of the frame because of the resilience of webs
106
′,
106
″, and
106
′″.
Furthermore, it is possible to resiliently mount a wall so that it acts like a diaphragmatic sound absorber. In particular, only one “side” of the frame assembly (e.g., lateral member
104
c
and/or lateral members
104
a
,
104
b
) is fixed to the surrounding structure, and the other side of the frame assembly has wall board or the like mounted thereon (i.e., on lateral members
102
a
,
102
b
), without attachment to the surrounding structure. The wall is therefore mounted on the “free” or “floating” side of the studs.
In order to enhance the effect of decoupling the one side of the wall frame from the surrounding structure, it is desirable to provide a soft gasket (made from, for example, foam rubber) between the lateral beam
100
c
and the surrounding structure (i.e., the ceiling and/or floor). This promotes relatively free movement of the one side of the frame that is not fixed to the surrounding building structure.
To further enhance the effect of decoupling the wall from the surrounding structure, it is preferable to provide flexible joint material at junctions between wall board segments, including at corners of rooms. Therefore the wall surface is visually continuous, but physically decoupled, in order to take advantage of the resultant sound attenuation effects.
Also, it is very desirable to provide additional sound and/or thermal insulation in the spaces defined by the studs and end plates. Such insulation can be of any conventional type, including blown, rolled or batting, foam board, etc. The addition of such insulation enhances sound attenuation effects resulting from the present invention.
FIGS. 6 and 7
are a partial perspective view and a partial plan view, respectively, of beam
200
, in accordance with another embodiment of the present invention.
The design concept underlying beam
200
is fundamentally similar to that of beam
100
. Like before, lateral members
202
and
204
are provided, and are resiliently spaced apart from each other by web
206
. Unlike web
106
in beam
100
, however, web
206
is not embedded in lateral members
202
,
204
. Instead, web
206
is fixed (by any conventional means, such as nails, as shown in
FIGS. 6 and 7
) relative to opposite faces of lateral members
202
,
204
along the major dimension of the beam cross section.
An imaginary reference plan
208
is depicted in FIG.
6
. The imaginary reference plane
208
relates to the lateral members
202
and
204
similarly to how the imaginary reference plane
108
of
FIGS. 1-2
relates to the lateral members
102
and
104
in both the preferred and alternative arrangements.
As in the first embodiment, a plurality of spaced apart webs
206
may be provided along the length of beam
200
(see, for example, FIG.
7
).
Web
206
is preferably made from a material that is slightly more flexible than that used for web
106
, such as
24
gauge galvanized steel.
Initial comparative testing has been undertaken comparing the sound attenuation characteristics of conventional construction members versus beam
100
and beam
200
. Initial results indicate that beam
100
has greater than expected attenuation characteristics, and that beam
200
should have even better attenuation performance than beam
100
. This latter effect is thought to be caused by the shape and orientation of web
206
, which more easily permits a normal compression between lateral members
202
,
204
.
In addition, as a variation of the embodiment illustrated in
FIG. 7
, the plurality of webs are alternately arranged so that the portion of the webs extending obliquely thereacross alternates (thereby crossing each other, as seen from an end of beam
200
) (see FIG.
8
). In
FIG. 8
, beam
300
comprises lateral beams
302
and
304
, and includes a plurality of first webs
306
a which are spaced from and alternate with a plurality of second webs
306
b
. Accordingly, respective intermediate portions of webs
306
a
and
306
b
criss-cross as seen from an end of beam
300
.
Inasmuch as sound that one seeks to attenuate or isolate is typically physically unique relative to particular environments (e.g., a home theater room, a movie theater, a machine shop, a recording studio, a concert hall), it is an important feature of the present invention to provide a construction member that can be “tuned” in order to tailor its sound attenuation properties for a specific environment. In other words, a beam according to the present invention can be specifically manufactured so that its resilient properties (in terms of, for example, spring constant) are made to correspond to a particular kind of sound (especially in terms of its frequency) so that sound attenuation can be maximized.
Such “tuning” can be accomplished by varying the thickness of web
106
,
206
, either uniformly or variably over the entire area of web
106
,
206
. In addition, notches, slits, or other openings can be formed in web
106
,
206
to control the resilience of web
106
,
206
in accordance with known principles of physics. In addition, suitably sized perforations or openings in a continuous web can be formed so as to create a tunable Helmholtz resonator effect between adjacent cavities defined between studs in the framework illustrated in FIG.
5
. By altering the number and/or size of the perforations or openings, a resultant Helmholtz resonant frequency can be controlled, at which attenuation of sound at that frequency is maximized. It should be noted that this is different from reference to a plurality of webs as shown in
FIGS. 3
,
7
, and
8
.
It can therefore be appreciated that adjoining rooms may be constructed (e.g., adjoining musical studios) such that each room can be tuned in accordance with its respective mode of use. In particular, this may be accomplished by constructed “double wall” framework, where two frames of the structure illustrated in
FIG. 5
are constructed face-to-face, such that the respective opposing sides of the frames are fixed to the surrounding building structure and their respective opposite sides are left free floating in the manner discussed above.
Although construction members according to the present invention have been described hereinabove for wall frames and the like, they are also contemplated for use in mounting floating ceilings which are acoustically isolated from a building structure. In addition, construction members according to the present invention may also be used in floor construction.
In particular, a construction member for mounting a floating ceiling may be used by fixing one of the lateral members to the building structure and fixing a ceiling member to the free floating lateral member (i.e., the lateral member not fixed to the building structure).
Although the use of substantially identical lateral members is contemplated according to the present invention, it is expressly within the scope of the present invention to use dissimilar lateral members. For example, one of the lateral members
102
,
104
shown in
FIG. 2
may be replaced by a conventional wood I-beam of the type described above. In particular as in
FIG. 9
, web
106
may be embedded in the flange portion
904
of the wood I-beam
902
(that also includes another flange portion
906
with a rigid web
908
between the flanges
904
and
906
), in the manner disclosed above.
Although the present invention is directed primarily to construction members made from non-metal materials, the design concepts may be of interest in the manufacture of metal studs comprising a pair of metal members with a resilient web extending therebetween in accordance with the foregoing description. In particular, a metal stud using the inventive principles disclosed herein could be made from a single piece of sheet metal, formed into shape.
The present invention being thusly described, it will be obvious that the same may be varied in many ways. Such variations are not to be regarded as a departure from the spirit and scope of the invention, and all such modifications as would be obvious to one skilled in the art are intended to be included within the scope of the following claims.
Claims
- 1. A beam comprising:a pair of spaced apart lateral members; and at least one resilient web extending between said respective pair of said lateral members and having respective end portions fixed to respective ones of said lateral members on opposite sides of an imaginary reference plane passing orthogonally through both of said lateral members; wherein said end portions are fixed to respective facing sides of said lateral members, said facing sides being parallel to said imaginary reference plane.
- 2. The beam member according to claim 1, wherein said lateral members are squared in cross-section.
- 3. The beam member according to claim 1, wherein said web extends obliquely between said lateral members.
- 4. The beam member according to claim 1, wherein said web is made from metal.
- 5. The beam member according to claim 4, wherein said web is made from galvanized steel.
- 6. The beam member according to claim 4, wherein said web is made from 22 gauge stock or thinner.
- 7. The beam member according to claim 5, wherein said web is made from 22 gauge stock or thinner.
- 8. The beam member according to claim 1, wherein said lateral members are made from wood.
- 9. The beam member according to claim 1, wherein said lateral members are made from wood particle board.
- 10. The beam member according to claim 8, lateral members are made from finger jointed wood segments.
- 11. The beam member according to claim 1, wherein said end portions are fixed in grooves formed is said lateral members, respectively.
- 12. The beam member according to claim 1, wherein said end portions are fixed to respective opposite sides said lateral members.
- 13. The beam member according to claim 1, wherein said web includes at least one opening therein sized in accordance with Helmholtz resonator principles so as to correspond to predetermined sound frequency.
- 14. The beam member of claim 1, wherein said spaced apart lateral members are connected by a vibration damping spacer interposed therebetween, whereby said spaced apart lateral members are elastically disposed relative to each other.
- 15. The beam member according to claim 1, wherein one of said lateral members is and I-beam, a respective said end portion of said resilient web being fixed to a flange portion of said I-beam.
- 16. The beam member according to claim 1, comprising a plurality of spaced apart said web extending between respective pairs of said lateral members.
US Referenced Citations (30)
Foreign Referenced Citations (8)
Number |
Date |
Country |
872 894 |
Apr 1979 |
BE |
552 110 |
Jul 1974 |
CH |
18 14 435 |
Jun 1970 |
DE |
17 84 729 |
Aug 1971 |
DE |
0 136 618 |
Apr 1985 |
EP |
0 745 470 |
Dec 1996 |
EP |
630 311 |
Oct 1949 |
GB |
91 02865 |
Mar 1991 |
WO |