1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to a pad for handling force loads to prevent wear on the load bearing surface of a pedestal of a rail vehicle, and more particularly relates to improvements in force handling in an arrangement where a wear plate specifically designed for convenient and removable installation in the pedestal opening of a railway side frame is used in order to prevent wear on the load bearing surface of the pedestal.
2. Brief Description of the Related Art
For the sake of brevity, the teachings and complete disclosures of previous U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,897,736 and 4,203,371 are incorporated herein by reference. In many cases, a bearing adapter is provided over the axle bearing, said adapter having a slightly arcuate top surface which bears directly against a corresponding downwardly facing surface in the pedestal opening of the side frame. This arcuate top surface provides the wheel and axle with a freely pivoting end condition to avoid binding loads on the roller bearing. In order to reduce wear on the pedestal, a wear plate is placed between the downwardly facing pedestal surface and the top surface of the bearing adapter. The wear plate may have side lips and may clip onto the pedestal.
In service, movement or frictional sliding may occur between the bearing adapter and the clip-on pedestal wear plate, which may cause damage to the clip-on pedestal wear plate, resulting in the need to replace the wear plate. This condition also may result in the loss of the freely pivoting end condition and may weaken the frame at a load-bearing location. Repair of the frame surface is both expensive and time-consuming, since the worn surface must be ground down to return it to a flat condition. The amount of grinding allowed, however, is limited by structural considerations; after the limit has been reached, the side frame casting is condemned. Replacing the clip-on wear plate is less expensive, but still costly, as it involves removing the railroad car from service and jacking the car so that the broken clip-on wear plates can be removed and replaced.
The plate working load and stress are defined as the frictional forces applied to the wear plate by the bearing adapter as a rail car in service shifts and moves about laterally. These frictional forces induce a tendency for lateral movement of the wear plate, and are opposed by the corresponding friction developed between the plate top and the pedestal roof surface. If this opposing frictional force is insufficient to resist this movement, additional bending load and stress are imposed on the side lips of the wear plate. The sensitivity to imbalance in these frictional forces, and hence the tendency to impose stress and load on the plate side lips, increases with heavily loaded rail cars such as coal cars.
The result of the total installation related tensile stresses in combination with stress related to bearing adapter friction can result in a significant shortening of the plate service life. In some cases, the total tensile stresses developed may reach the yield strength of the plate and thereby cause bending of the plate. In other more severe cases the ultimate strength of the plate may be reached causing cracking of the plate.
The problem of the frictional force load handling has been further complicated as of late because of recent frame painting practices. As environmental concerns have caused an effort to reduce volatile organic emissions from sources including paints, rail car frames are increasingly being painted with solvent-free and alternative solvent based paints. One of the disadvantages of these paints is that a resultant painted surface will have a significantly lower coefficient of friction as compared to a surface painted by older “traditional” paints; at times the new paint may even be thought of as acting as a sort of lubricant. This has the disadvantageous result of greatly reducing the frictional force between the plate top surface and the pedestal roof surface, thereby increasing the effective tensile stress in the plate. This has in turn resulted in an increased occurrence in wear plate bending and cracking.
Increasing the thickness of the plate would seem to offer a means to achieving increased plate strength sufficient to resist lateral movement and consequent failure. The benefits of increasing plate thickness, however, are limited. A practical limit on plate thickness exists as installation bending stresses caused as the side lips are forced apart during plate installation increase in direct proportion to the plate thickness. The difference between these installation bending stresses and the ultimate stress at which failure occurs determine the working capacity of the plate to resist movement. At some thickness a maximum plate working capacity is reached and further thickness increases actually decrease working capacity.
For the above stated reasons, an unresolved need exists for a pedestal wear plate or wear plate assembly with an improved ability to withstand tensile stresses and thereby enjoy a reduced occurrence of bending and cracking.
According to a preferred embodiment, a resilient pad for use in connection with a pedestal wear plate is provided. The pad prevents or minimizes the aforesaid problems associated with plate tensile stress bending and cracking, while not introducing any significant increase in required installation effort. The pad is configured to facilitate handling of the load forces and stresses, and preferably accomplishes this by substantially absorbing and distributing the stresses while increasing the friction between the clip-on wear plate and the pedestal roof.
According to preferred embodiments, the pad has a configuration that facilitates the distribution of force loads and prevents or minimizes the concentration of force loads at a particular location.
According to a preferred embodiment, the pad comprises a face with a substantially flat surface that engages the pedestal wear plate and has a bulged opposite face. Retaining elements preferably are provided to facilitate holding of the pad on the wear plate. According to one embodiment, two lips at opposite ends of the pad running perpendicular to the pad's length, as well as two extensions on either side of the pad running parallel to the pad's length, hold the pad in a preferred location, centered on the clip-on wear plate.
According to a preferred embodiment, the force handling structures include two bulges, which preferably are dome-shaped, and act to distribute downward force loads and horizontally spread these loads out over the surface of the clip-on wear plate.
According to one embodiment, the force handling structures are provided on both sides of the pad. According to another embodiment, one side of the pad has a substantially flat surface and the other side of the pad has a surface that contains bulged regions.
It is an object of the invention to provide a pad that provides a more evenly distributed force load relative to the wear plate so as to avoid concentration of force loads in a particular location on the wear plate.
It is another object of the present invention to provide a pad that reduces or eliminates point loading associated with the poor surface finish of the cast pedestal roof, where the surface finishes are associated with lower coefficients of friction.
It is an object of the invention to extend the life of a resilient pedestal wear plate by changing the load bearing and friction characteristics to offer improved capacity to withstand tensile stresses, while not significantly increasing required installation effort.
According to an alternate embodiment, a pad is provided and is configured for disposition between a bearing adapter and a pedestal surface to facilitate the handling of force loads. The alternate embodiment preferably is constructed with one or more features to facilitate alignment of the pad with the bearing adapter surface. According to some embodiments, the pad may be installed between the bearing adapter and the pedestal roof surface (such as the flat surface in a pedestal opening), with the lower surface of the pad engaging the bearing adapter and the upper surface of the pad engaging the pedestal roof surface.
Referring to
Preferably, the raised portions 15a, 15b are configured as two dome shaped bulges which, when encountering the force from the frame 510 or pedestal 511 (see
Referring to
Preferably, the pads 10, 110, 210 are constructed from a suitable elastomeric material that is durable and resilient. Preferred materials from which the pads 10, 110, 210 may be made include natural and synthetic rubbers, polyurethanes, urethanes, elastomers, co-elastomers, thermoplastic elastomers (TPE), copolyester elastomers (COPE) and other suitable materials. Preferably, the durometer of the pad is from about 58 A to 75 D, and more preferably from about 70 A to 75 D, or from about 90 A to 58 D. Although the pads 10, 110, 210 shown and described herein preferably may be constructed having a thickness suitable to handle the force loads that are anticipated being received from the truck and associated rail cars and the car loads, it has been found that preferred pad thicknesses may range from between about 1/32″ and 4/7″. The pads shown and described herein may be constructed from a one-piece component, or alternately, the pads may be constructed from one or more components. For example, in some instances it may be advantageous to utilize a two-part pad, where, for example, the locking lips 16a, 16b, 116a, 116b, 216a, 216b, and centering arms, 17a, 17b, 217a, 217b are made from lower cost tougher plastic or metal. The pad 10, 110, 210 may be constructed by molding, casting, extruding, or other suitable production technique.
The present invention thereby offers a practical and effective solution to the serious tensile stress related plate bending and breaking problems experienced by clip-on pedestal wear plates. An exemplary environment is illustrated in
Referring to
According to an alternate configuration, the second pad 310b is provided and installed between the wear plate 525 and the adapter 516, and the wear plate upper surface 528 is permitted to carry the pedestal 511 directly thereon. According to another alternate installation configuration, a pad, such as those pads 10, 110, and 210 shown and described herein, is positioned between the bearing adapter 516 and the downwardly facing flat surface 517 in the pedestal opening so that the flat surface 517 engages a surface on one side of the pad and the upper portion of the bearing adapter 516 engages the surface on the other side of the pad. The pad 10, 110, 210 facilitates the force handling by handling force loads received through the pedestal 511. In
While preferred embodiments and example configurations have been shown and described, it is to be understood that various further modifications and additional configurations will be apparent to those skilled in the art. Other embodiments of the invention, for example, may comprise more or fewer bulges on the top face and/or bottom face. Although locking lips 16, 116 and 216 are illustrated along the edge of the pad 19, 110, 210, respectively, the locking lips may be configured as one or more segments or elements, such as, for example, the locking segments 316 shown in
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1964671 | Nesbitt | Jun 1934 | A |
2648573 | Wheildon | Aug 1953 | A |
3381629 | Jones | May 1968 | A |
3638582 | Beebe | Feb 1972 | A |
3699897 | Sherrick | Oct 1972 | A |
3785298 | Reynolds | Jan 1974 | A |
3897736 | Tack | Aug 1975 | A |
4094253 | Gage | Jun 1978 | A |
4108080 | Garner et al. | Aug 1978 | A |
4168666 | Gage | Sep 1979 | A |
4170180 | Houston | Oct 1979 | A |
4203371 | Tack | May 1980 | A |
4239007 | Kleykamp et al. | Dec 1980 | A |
4313384 | Holden et al. | Feb 1982 | A |
4363278 | Mulcahy | Dec 1982 | A |
4380199 | Thomson et al. | Apr 1983 | A |
4428303 | Tack | Jan 1984 | A |
4785740 | Grandy | Nov 1988 | A |
5009521 | Wiebe | Apr 1991 | A |
5081935 | Pavlick | Jan 1992 | A |
5237933 | Bucksbee | Aug 1993 | A |
5404826 | Rudibaugh et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5425312 | Tack, Jr. | Jun 1995 | A |
5562045 | Rudibaugh et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5799582 | Rudibaugh et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
6178894 | Leingang | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6234083 | Tack, Jr. | May 2001 | B1 |
6347588 | Leingang | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6823741 | Gammon | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6895866 | Forbes | May 2005 | B2 |
7004079 | Forbes | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7143700 | Forbes et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7174837 | Berg et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7231878 | Wike | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7255048 | Forbes | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7263931 | Forbes | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7267059 | Forbes | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7308855 | Van Auken | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7328659 | Forbes | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7387074 | Myers | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7497169 | Forbes et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7739961 | East et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7845288 | Forbes et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120186486 A1 | Jul 2012 | US |