RESIN APPLICATION SYSTEM AND METHOD

Information

  • Patent Application
  • 20140178592
  • Publication Number
    20140178592
  • Date Filed
    December 19, 2013
    11 years ago
  • Date Published
    June 26, 2014
    10 years ago
Abstract
Non-woven matrices and, more particularly, cotton shoddy and/or natural fiber matrices, and systems and methods for producing the matrices are described herein.
Description
BACKGROUND

The subject matter disclosed herein relates generally to non-woven matrices and, more particularly, to cotton shoddy and/or natural fiber matrices and systems and methods for producing cotton shoddy matrices.


Commercially available technology exists today for the purpose of applying liquids to a non-woven matrix, such as a matrix constructed from natural fiber and/or cotton shoddy. One technology includes dipping a continuous feed of a non-woven matrix into a tank of emulsion resin, then squeezing the resin-saturated matrix to remove excess content, while a second technology includes converting emulsion resin into a dense foam using a foam generating system, and injecting the foam into the matrix under pressure using a specially designed application head made for this purpose. While both of these technologies may work to some degree for certain natural fiber non-woven matrices, neither is well suited to resin-saturate cotton shoddy.


Several disadvantages exist with conventional foam injection processes. Foam injection requires a continuous feed of a non-woven matrix. After foam is injected into the non-woven matrix, the non-woven matrix is cut to appropriate size requirements and dried prior to final processing. Further, foam injection requires a wider matrix than an actual foam application area. This excess material provides an edge seal to prevent foam from escaping from an edge area of the continuously moving matrix during foam impregnation. This process does not allow the recycling of the excess of material after cutting to size before resin impregnation. In addition, only one side of the continuously feed matrix can be injected with foam having a certain desired uniformity of application. This, therefore, requires two passes of the non-woven matrix through the foam injection applicator in order to completely resonate the non-woven matrix. Foam injection also tends to be expensive. Capital costs are higher, process application of resonating matrix is slower, and therefore this is an undesirable means of applying a liquid resin into non-woven matrix.


Several disadvantages also exist with conventional dip and squeeze processes. The conventional dip and squeeze process is often undesirable because of problems associated with accuracy of application. However, dip and squeeze may have a better throughput capability than conventional foam injection processes. Similar to the foam injection process, conventional dip and squeeze technology requires the product to be run using a continuous feed of non-woven matrix. It does not allow the recycling of the excess material after cutting to size before resin impregnation.


It is desirable to develop an application system that utilizes the simplicity of a dip and squeeze process or applying the resin on a scrim and then laminating the scrim on a matrix made of thermoplastic and cotton shoddy and/or natural fibers, and achieves the accuracy results of a foam injection process, while doing so with a feed of precut matrix blanks as opposed to roll goods required for existing technology.


SUMMARY

In one aspect, a process system incorporates a modified dip and squeeze process system combined with a modified injection system that pumps non-foam resin directly into a non-woven matrix while the non-woven matrix remains substantially submerged in a resin contained within a resin tank.


In another aspect, a method for producing cotton shoddy and/or natural fiber matrices includes a modified dip and squeeze process combined with a modified injection process that pumps non-foam resin directly into the non-woven matrix while the non-woven matrix remains substantially submerged in a resin contained within a resin tank.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a schematic view of an exemplary device for impregnating a matrix blank with a resin;



FIG. 2A is a schematic view of the device shown in FIG. 1, with the framing and support structure removed for clarity;



FIG. 2B is a schematic view of an exemplary device for impregnating a matrix blank with a resin including a plurality of compression squeeze rolls;



FIG. 3 is a schematic view of an exemplary application line including the device shown in FIGS. 1 and 2A, coupled to a microwave forced air drying oven; and



FIG. 4 is a schematic view of an exemplary application line including the device shown in FIGS. 1 and 2A, coupled to a hot air drying oven.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The embodiments described herein are directed to a non-woven matrix, such as a non-phenol formaldehyde cotton shoddy matrix, for example, and a process system for the application of a suitable emulsify resin, such as an Acrodur™ resin available from BASF Aktiengesellschaft Corp., Ludwigshafen am Rhein, Germany, for example, that substantially completely saturates the cotton shoddy matrix through a thickness of the cotton shoddy matrix. In certain embodiments, the process system is scalable to meet any application requirement. In addition and for means of practicality, in certain embodiments the system design intent includes the ability to resonate individual cut sheet sizes without the need for a continuous feed of matrix. This will facilitate recycling the excess of material after cutting to size before resin impregnation.


In the following description, the embodiments are described in relation to a cotton shoddy matrix. This is by way of example only, it being understood that the embodiments may be implemented for use with suitable natural fiber non-woven matrices.


In one embodiment, the process system incorporates a modified dip and squeeze process system combined with a modified injection system that pumps non-foam resin directly into the non-woven matrix while the non-woven matrix remains substantially submerged in a resin contained within a resin tank, as described in greater detail below with reference to FIGS. 1-4. Unlike conventional dip and squeeze systems, the process system described herein allows for the use of precut matrix blanks prior to resonating. In a particular embodiment, the process system includes two open weave, glass fiber belts coated with a Teflon™ coating to carry each matrix blank through the resin application process to significantly reduce the strain on the non-woven matrix blank during saturation, and further reduce or eliminate any tensile pull on the matrix blank during the process, an undesirable affect caused by conventional systems. This system allows to dip and squeeze material in both directions (machine direction and cross-machine direction) which is not reasonably possible in conventional foam injection and continuous dip and squeeze systems.


Resonating cotton shoddy with a liquid resin product is virtually impossible to achieve using existing dip and squeeze technology. A cotton shoddy non-woven matrix does not have sufficient tensile strength to carry the matrix through a conventional dip and squeeze system without tearing under the nominal tensile pulls that are typically exerted on a product during a resin application and post-matrix drying. Additionally, the wet pick up rate (the rate of added weight of resin and water to fully impregnate the cotton shoddy matrix) adds more than 110% additional weight to a pre-resonated matrix weight. The additional weight, in addition to the weak strengths of short fiber cotton shoddy, renders existing technologies impractical to adopt for this purpose.


Referring to FIGS. 1-4, an exemplary process system 10 includes a resin application station 12, a drying station 14 and a palletizing station 16 operatively coupled in series. Referring further to FIGS. 1, 2A and 2B, resin application station 12 includes a tank, such as a stainless steel tank 20 configured to contain a suitable amount of an aqueous solution of a resin material and water. In a particular embodiment, the aqueous solution comprises an Acrodur™ resin and water. A first or lower carrying belt 22 is operatively coupled to and supported by a frame 24. In one embodiment, lower carrying belt 22 is a fiberglass-reinforced, Teflon™ coated open webbing belt, although other belts can be used as lower carrying belt 22. As shown in FIG. 1, frame 24 is a stainless steel construction frame configured to support the associated components of resin application station 12, for example, associated belts, bearings, and drives. Resin application station 12 also includes one or more belt rolls 26 and a fixed compression roll 28 to further support lower carrying belt 22, and a bottom belt drive unit 30 configured to drive lower carrying belt 22 about belt rolls 26. In one embodiment, belt drive unit 30 includes a PLC-controlled, AC inverter drive with gear reductions for lower carrying belt 32, as well as for a cooperating upper carrying belt 32.


In one embodiment, upper carrying belt 32 is a fiberglass-reinforced, Teflon™ coated open webbing belt, as described above with reference to lower carrying belt 22, although other belts can be used as upper carrying belt 32. In other embodiments, upper carrying belt 32 may be the same as or different than lower carrying belt 22. Upper carrying belt 32 is operatively coupled to and supported by stainless steel frame 24, one or more belt rolls 36, and an adjustable compression roll 38. A belt drive unit 40 is configured to drive upper carrying belt 32 about belt rolls 36. In one embodiment, belt drive unit 40 includes a PLC-controlled, AC inverter drive with gear reductions for upper carrying belt 32. Alternatively, belt drive unit 30 may include a PLC-controlled, AC inverter drive with gear reductions for upper carrying belt 32, as well as for lower carrying belt 22.


Referring again to FIG. 1, a level 42 of the aqueous solution is maintained in tank 20 to sufficiently submerge a matrix blank 43, securely positioned between lower carrying belt 22 and upper carrying belt 32, in the aqueous solution. In one embodiment, level 42 is maintained by using a sonic level control device or other suitable level control device, which adds a desired amount of pre-mixed aqueous solution to tank 20 as required.


In one embodiment, electrically-driven screw jacks 44, shown in FIG. 1, are configured to move or urge adjustable compression roll 38 with respect to fixed compression roll 28. In a particular embodiment, screw jacks 44 are activated to move adjustable compression roll 38 to a predetermined point with respect to an outer surface of fixed compression roll 28 to define a gap 46, shown in FIG. 2A, through which lower carrying belt 22 and upper carrying belt 32 carry matrix blank 43 saturated with resin. A gap clearance is adjustable through the activation of screw jacks 44 to set a compression force applied to the saturated matrix blank 43 as matrix blank 43 is carried by lower carrying belt 22 and upper carrying belt 32 through gap 46. As the saturated matrix blank 43 moves continuously through gap 46 under a desired compression force applied by the cooperating adjustable compression roll 38 and fixed compression roll 28, excess resin and water is flushed from the saturated matrix blank 43 providing an impregnated matrix blank 43 having an amount of resin/water solution equal to a total wet pickup required to achieve a desired percentage of resin dry solids add-on. As shown in FIG. 2B, in one embodiment, resin application system 12 includes a plurality of adjustable compression roll sets, such as a series of three adjustable compression roll sets 38A, 38B, and 38C, to facilitate removing excess resin and water from the saturated matrix blank 43.


Referring to FIG. 3, the impregnated matrix blank 43 is transferred from resin application station 12 to drying station 14 by a transfer belt 50. In this embodiment, drying station 14 includes a microwave drying oven 60 having an air suction fan 62 configured to remove water vapor as means to accelerate drying time. Drying oven size depends on dimensions, such as a width, of matrix blanks 43 being dried, as well as a linear flow speed of matrix blanks 43 through drying oven 60. In a particular embodiment, drying oven 60 is a 75 Kw magnetron microwave drying oven capable of drying resonated matrix blanks 43 having a width of 1.5 meters traveling through drying oven 60 at linear flow speed of 5 meters per minute. Microwave drying oven 60, as described herein, provides for an overall size reduction in the line foot print of process system 10 and a reduction in energy cost to remove excess water, for example, when compared with conventional drying stations. Once the impregnated matrix blank 43 is dried, the impregnated matrix blank 43 is transferred from an outlet of drying oven 60 to an automatic stacking device 70 of palletizing station 16 by a dry matrix blank conveyor 72 to form a stack of dry matrix blanks 43.


Alternatively, referring to FIG. 4, the impregnated matrix blank 43 is transferred from resin application station 12 to drying station 14 by a transfer belt 50. In this embodiment, drying station 14 includes a hot air drying oven 80. Like microwave drying oven 60 described above, hot air drying oven size depends on dimensions, such as a width, of matrix blanks 43 being dried, as well as a linear flow speed of matrix blanks 43 through drying oven 60. Once the impregnated matrix blank 43 is dried, the impregnated matrix blank 43 is transferred from an outlet of hot air drying oven 80 to an automatic stacking device 70 of palletizing station 16 by a dry matrix blank conveyor 72 to form a stack of dry matrix blanks 43.


Process system 10 as described with reference to drying station 14 shown in FIGS. 3 and 4 can be utilized with either pre-cut matrix blanks 43 or a matrix roll 82 of desired material, as shown in FIG. 4. With process system 10 operating with matrix roll 82 to supply a continuous feed of material, a guillotine cross-cutter 84 cuts matrix blanks 43 from the continuously fed matrix prior to palletizing, for example, as the continuous feed of matrix material exits drying oven 80 onto conveyor 72, as shown in FIG. 4.


Referring again to FIGS. 1-4, a method for forming impregnated matrix blanks 43 with process system 10 as described herein includes, in one embodiment, placing a precut matrix blank 43 of cotton shoddy, or another suitable fibrous non-woven matrix that will absorb an aqueous resin solution, on a top surface of lower carrying belt 22 coated with a suitable coating, such as a Teflon™ coating. Lower carrying belt 22 moves at a speed equal to a speed at which upper cooperating carrying belt 32 moves. In this embodiment, upper carrying belt 32 is also coated with a suitable coating, such as a Teflon™ coating.


Lower carrying belt 22 and upper carrying belt 32 meet to secure or trap the precut matrix blank 43 between lower carrying belt 22 and upper carrying belt 32 prior to or as matrix blank 43 enters tank 20 containing a liquid resin, such as an aqueous solution of a resin and water. As lower carrying belt 22 and upper carrying belt 32 move through tank 20, matrix blank 43 secured between opposing and cooperating lower carrying belt 22 and upper carrying belt 32 is submerged into the aqueous solution contained within tank 20 at a suitable speed to ensure that matrix blank 43 is submerged in the aqueous solution for a sufficient exposure time so that full saturation of the resin throughout matrix blank 43 is achieved. For highly absorbent and dense products, such as cotton shoddy, lower carrying belt 22 and upper carrying belt 32 slide between two stainless steel spring loaded plates that cover a full width of the belts and at least 24 inches of a running length of the belts at any time. One or more nozzles are positioned in a middle portion of each plate in a machine direction, and run across the width of the each plate. Resin is pumped through the one or more nozzles at a predetermined velocity to force resin into a center of matrix blank 43 while matrix blank 43 moves in the machine direction. An added length of the plates ensures that pressure is focused in a desired treatment area. Pre-load spring pressure is sufficient to keep the nozzles and pressure plates compressed to each belt, thereby forming a seal to prevent resin blow by. Resin is forced under pressure into matrix blank 43 to facilitate accelerating absorption of the resin to a center core of matrix blank 43. Other matrices can be resonated similarly to accelerate the resonating speed, but this is the only process which ensures cotton shoddy is fully resonated throughout a Z dimension.


At the end of the submersion process, lower carrying belt 22 and upper carrying belt 32 carrying the resin impregnated non-woven matrix blank 43 tum 90 degrees upwards ascending above tank 20 and entering a squeeze process to remove excess liquid resin to achieve the desired application rate. Using cooperating fixed compression roll 28 and adjustable compression roll 38, with lower carrying belt 22 and upper carrying belt 32 securing matrix blank 43 therebetween, matrix blank 43 moves into and through the squeeze rolls. In one embodiment, three compression roll sets are used, one above the other, to facilitate extracting excess resin from the resonated matrix blank. Each of the three vertical compression rolls, as shown in FIG. 2B, is set at a particular gap to provide less strain on matrix blank 43, and at the same time applying three different rates of pressure on the wetted matrix blank 43 to optimize solution extraction. (FIG. 1 shows only one set of such compression rolls). This squeeze action allows excess resin to flush out of matrix blank 43, flowing equally on opposing sides of the incoming pre-squeezed matrix blank 43 to maintain consistent and uniform liquid exposure equally to opposing sides of matrix blank 43. Exiting squeeze rolls, upper carrying belt 32 separates from matrix blank 43 to allow lower carrying belt 22 to deliver matrix blank 43 into a drying oven for downstream final processing.


EXAMPLES

Example of formulation for application of liquid resin is as follows.

    • Resonated cotton shoddy matrix at desired dry weight=1000 gsm.
    • Based weight of composite matrix pre-resonating=770 gsm at 0% moisture. Active resin required to meet resonated gram weight of matrix=230 gsm. Acrodur™ resin as supplied by BASF=50% water, 50% active dry solids resin. Required active dry solids solution to apply resin to cotton shoddy=25%.
    • True wet pick required to apply 230 gsm dry solids resin=(100/25)=3×230=690 gsm or 89%.


Wet pick up for cotton shoddy to fully wet out matrix blank during solution application is greater than 125% or 1250 gsm of aqueous solution, pick up during dipping matrix in solution or 55%′ greater dilution in solution mix in order to apply 230 gsm dry solids resin. Therefore the aqueous solution mix needs to be further diluted to (100/18)=5.55×230=1276 gsm.


After resin impregnation, the impregnated matrix blank 43 is dried of excess water prior to use. Because the rate of water evaporation is very high compared to the final matrix blank weight (up to 70%), conventional technology using air impingement driers to perform this task requires ovens lengths often exceeding 50 feet and normally greater than 100 feet in length to run at any appreciable speed. This large foot print takes up valuable floor space and, as a means of energy utilization for drying, is one of the least efficient means to control drying costs. Based on test results, adopting microwave technology in the processing line reduces operating costs and reduces floor space requirements. Microwave oven technology works on the principal of exciting water molecules through energy waves causing the water molecules to vibrate rapidly. Further, microwave technology works on the mass inside out, a more desirable drying method than conventional air impingement ovens that work through transpiration or wicking water from the inside to the drier outside. Because final moisture content is critical to thermal processing (Acrodur™ resin requires moisture to be present in a sufficient quantity to cross-link resin), microwave heating and the ability to precisely control the amount of applied energy allows the process system to deliver matrix blank 43 having a desired pre-set moisture content exiting the drying oven without overheating matrix blank 43. Also, due to the intense focused energy microwave technology offers, the footprint required for oven drying is reduced by 75% over conventional hot air impingement-type drying. Therefore, in contrast to a conventional air oven that must be about 100 feet long to dry matrix blanks, a microwave drying oven, such as described herein, may be less than 25 feet in length. With the use of focused energy, the amount of energy required to dry the same material in the same time cycle is also greatly reduced.


In certain embodiments, cotton shoddy was formulated to include, without limitation, the following: cotton shoddy comprising cotton shoddy ranging from 10% to 90% of dry composite matrix weight, and hi-component polyester fiber ranging from 10% to 90% of composite matrix weight, and natural fiber comprising one or more of the following: jute, tossa, hemp, cori, sisal, curaua, kenaf and other similar fibers ranging from 5% to 90% of composite matrix weight, and polyester fiber ranging from 10% to 90% of matrix weight.


An exemplary Composite Matrix Weight 770 gsm, comprises the following:





10% hi-component polyester=(770×0.10)=77 grams.  1.





35% natural fiber of any fiber type above=(770×0.35)=269.5 grams.  2





55% cotton shoddy=(770×0.55)=432.5 grams.  3


Another exemplary Composite Matrix has the same weight as follows:





10% bi-component polyester=(770×0.10)=77 grams.  1





90% cotton shoddy=(770×0.90)=693 grams.  2


Yet another exemplary Composite Matrix has the same weight as follows:





10% hi-component polyester=(770×0.10)=77 grams.  1





35% polyester fiber of any fiber type above=(770×0.35)=269.5 grams.  2





55% cotton shoddy=(770×0.55)=432.5 grams.  3


Yet another exemplary Composite Matrix has the same weight as follows:





10% bi-component polyester=(770×0.10)=77 grams.  1





20% polyester fiber of any fiber type above=(770×0.20)=154 grams.  2





45% cotton shoddy=(770×0.45)=346.5 grams.  3





25% natural fiber of any fiber type above=(770×0.25)=192.5 grams.  4


The combination of fiber types used can be in any percent always requiring two or more of the above fiber types. The percentage and combination of blends is dependent on the application requirements.


This combination of systems provides a unique opportunity to apply liquid resins to a fibrous matrix, such as a cotton shoddy matrix, that is sensitive to line process strain and resistant to absorption due to density. The system viewed in whole, may include one or more of the following in various embodiments.

    • 1. Resonating matrix blanks of non-woven matrix, which can include matrix made with one or more of the following materials: cotton shoddy, natural bast fiber including, but not limited to, jute, kenaf, curaua, hemp, and other similar cellulous fibers.
    • 2. Using twin belts to carrying matrix blanks into a resin tank.
    • 3. Using twin belts to limit any strain associated with a dip and squeeze or direct injection application of any liquid including resins, adhesives or other such products used as a binder in matrix.
    • 4. Twin plate injection system spring load to apply predetermined load during direct liquid injection.
    • 5. Flow design of system, including upper and lower belts, belt types and direction of flow.
    • 6. Direct pump resin system.
    • 7. Parallel resin flow back under squeeze rolls to keep resin contact equally on both sides.


Additional Data is attached as Appendix A, noting the following:

    • 1. Sample A, B, C, D, E & L are made with 90% cotton Shoddy and 10% Bico
    • 2. Sample F, G and H are made with 20% Hemp+25% Regenerated Polyester+10% Bico+45% Cotton Shoddy
    • 3. Sample I & J are made with 50% PP+40% shoddy+10% Bico
    • 4. All the samples with Jute (K samples) are from old runs and they are all made with 90% Jute (coffee bag)+10% Shoddy.


The described system and methods are not limited to the specific embodiments described herein. In addition, components of each system and/or steps of each method may be practiced independent and separate from other components and method steps, respectively, described herein. Each component and method also can be used in combination with other systems and methods.


This written description uses examples to disclose the invention, including the best mode, and also to enable any person skilled in the art to practice the invention, including making and using any devices or systems and performing any incorporated methods. The patentable scope of the invention is defined by the claims, and may include other examples that occur to those skilled in the art. Such other examples are intended to be within the scope of the claims if they have structural elements that do not differ from the literal language of the claims, or if they include equivalent structural elements with insubstantial differences from the literal language of the claims.









APPENDIX A







Sample 1*& 2* cut to size 20″ × 65¼″

























1*
1014.1
0.0894
923.43

11.00%
60
3680
2585.92
2.55
284.45
1207.88
30.80%
23.55%
1413
1329




2*
1053.4
0.0894
959.24

11.00%
60
3550
2496.59
2.37
274.62
1233.86
28.63%
22.26%
1444
1357







Sample D10 cut to size 20″ × 65½″

























D10*
1043
841.8
0.0894
766.56
 7.00%
60
3150
2308.18
2.7419
161.57
928.13
21.08%
17.41%
1086
1021








Sample E10 cut to size 20″ × 65-½″

























E10*
946
743.4
0.0894
676.91
11.00%
60
3000
2256.63
3.0357
248.23
925.14
36.67%
26.83%
1082
1018











Sample L cut to size 20″ × 65½″







































Dry to
Dry to


















17%
10%
Dry to 5%







L1
0.0
1038.6
0.0894
945.73
11.00%
60
3500
2461.42
2.37
270.76
1216.48
28.63%
22.26%
1423
1338
1277



L2

1170.2
0.0894
1065.60
11.00%
60
3850
2679.79
2.29
294.78
1360.37
27.66%
21.67%
1592
1496
1428



L3

983.1
0.0894
895.25
11.00%
60
3500
2516.85
2.56
276.85
1172.11
30.92%
23.62%
1371
1289
1231



L4

1014.5
0.0894
923.80
11.00%
60
3500
2485.51
2.45
273.41
1197.20
29.60%
22.84%
1401
1317
1257



L5

1116.1
0.0894
1016.29
11.00%
60
3750
2633.93
2.36
289.73
1306.03
28.51%
22.18%
1528
1437
1371



L6

1038.6
0.0894
945.73
11.00%
60
3500
2461.42
2.37
270.76
1216.48
28.63%
22.26%
1423
1338
1277









































Dry to
Dry to
Weight after
















17%
10%
Drying










Sample L6 cut to size 12″ × 12″























L6


















1
0.0
114.2
0.0894
104.03
11.00%
60
385
270.76
2.37
29.78
133.81
28.63%
22.26%
157
147
159


2

103.9
0.0894
94.57
11.00%
60
350
246.14
2.37
27.08
121.65
28.63%
22.26%
142
134
144


3

114.2
0.0894
104.03
11.00%
60
385
270.76
2.37
29.78
133.81
28.63%
22.26%
157
147
151


4

101.5
0.0894
92.41
11.00%
60
342
240.52
2.37
26.46
118.87
28.63%
22.26%
139
131
142


5

108.9
0.0894
99.17
11.00%
60
367
258.10
2.37
28.39
127.56
28.63%
22.26%
149
140
148







Sample L5 cut to size 12″ × 12″























L5


















1
0.0
109.5
0.0894
99.73
11.00%
60
368
258.48
2.36
28.43
128.16
28.51%
22.18%
150
141
150


2

116.7
0.0894
106.24
11.00%
60
392
275.33
2.36
30.29
136.52
28.51%
22.18%
160
150
156


3

112.5
0.0894
102.44
11.00%
60
378
265.50
2.36
29.21
131.65
28.51%
22.18%
154
145
148


4

127.4
0.0894
115.99
11.00%
60
428
300.62
2.36
33.07
149.06
28.51%
22.18%
174
164
166


5

131.8
0.0894
120.06
11.00%
60
443
311.15
2.36
34.23
154.29
28.51%
22.18%
181
170
169







Sample L4 cut to size 12″ × 12″























L4


















1
0.0
84.1
0.0894
76.54
11.00%
60
290
205.94
2.45
22.65
99.20
29.60%
22.84%
116
109
125


2

89.0
0.0894
81.03
11.00%
60
307
218.01
2.45
23.98
105.01
29.60%
22.84%
123
116
126


3

100.6
0.0894
91.59
11.00%
60
347
246.42
2.45
27.11
118.69
29.60%
22.84%
139
131
137


4

95.4
0.0894
86.84
11.00%
60
329
233.64
2.45
25.70
112.54
29.60%
22.84%
132
124
135


5

113.0
0.0894
102.94
11.00%
60
390
276.96
2.45
30.47
133.40
29.60%
22.84%
156
147
157







Sample L3 cut to size 12″× 12″























L3


















1
0.0
91.0
0.0894
82.87
11.00%
60
324
232.99
2.56
25.63
108.50
30.92%
23.62%
127
119
140


2

104.5
0.0894
95.15
11.00%
60
372
267.51
2.56
29.43
124.58
30.92%
23.62%
146
137
151


3

99.4
0.0894
90.55
11.00%
60
354
254.56
2.56
28.00
118.55
30.92%
23.62%
139
130
138


4

96.6
0.0894
87.99
11.00%
60
344
247.37
2.56
27.21
115.20
30.92%
23.62%
135
127
135


5

103.4
0.0894
94.13
11.00%
60
368
264.63
2.56
29.11
123.24
30.92%
23.62%
144
136
144







Sample L2 cut to size 12″ × 12″























L2


















1
0.0
109.4
0.0894
99.64
11.00%
60
360
250.58
2.29
27.56
127.20
27.66%
21.67%
149
140
147


2

107.6
0.0894
97.98
11.00%
60
354
246.40
2.29
27.10
125.08
27.66%
21.67%
146
138
144


3

110.6
0.0894
100.75
11.00%
60
364
253.36
2.29
27.87
128.62
27.66%
21.67%
150
141
148


4

115.5
0.0894
105.18
11.00%
60
380
264.50
2.29
29.09
134.27
27.66%
21.67%
157
148
154


5

115.5
0.0894
105.18
11.00%
60
389
264.50
2.29
29.09
134.27
27.66%
21.67%
157
148
162













Dry to
Weight after



17%
Drying











Jute Fiber samples K2 & K3 cut to size 12″ × 12″
























K3


















1
0.0
120.5
0.06
113.23
11.00%
60
418
297.54
2.47
32.73
145.96
28.90%
22.42%
171
173



2

113.5
0.06
106.73
11.00%
60
394
280.46
2.47
30.85
137.58
28.90%
22.42%
161
157



3

117.0
0.06
109.98
11.00%
60
406
289.00
2.47
31.79
141.77
28.90%
22.42%
166
163



4

115.9
0.06
108.90
11.00%
60
402
286.15
2.47
31.48
140.38
28.90%
22.42%
164
159



5

111.8
0.06
105.11
11.00%
60
388
276.18
2.47
30.38
135.49
28.90%
22.42%
159
155



6

119.3
0.06
112.15
11.00%
60
414
294.69
2.47
32.42
144.57
28.90%
22.42%
169
169



7

112.4
0.06
105.65
11.00%
60
390
277.61
2.47
30.54
136.19
28.90%
22.42%
159
140



8

117.0
0.06
109.98
11.00%
60
400
289.00
2.47
31.79
141.77
28.90%
22.42%
166
153



9

110.1
0.06
103.48
11.00%
60
382
271.91
2.47
29.91
133.39
28.90%
22.42%
156
155



10 

108.9
0.06
102.40
11.00%
60
378
269.07
2.47
29.60
131.99
28.90%
22.42%
154
145



11 

123.3
0.06
115.94
11.00%
60
428
304.66
2.47
33.51
149.45
28.90%
22.42%
175
170



12 

113.5
0.06
106.73
11.00%
60
394
280.46
2.47
30.85
137.58
28.90%
22.42%
161
161



13 

114.7
0.06
107.82
11.00%
60
398
283.30
2.47
31.16
138.98
28.90%
22.42%
163
161



14 

121.0
0.06
113.78
11.00%
60
420
298.96
2.47
32.89
146.66
28.90%
22.42%
172
171



15 

131.4
0.06
123.53
11.00%
60
456
324.59
2.47
35.70
159.23
28.90%
22.42%
186
189



K2



1
0.0
123.1
0.06
115.73
11.00%
60
426
302.88
2.46
33.32
149.05
28.79%
22.35%
174
175



2

122.5
0.06
115.19
11.00%
60
424
301.46
2.46
33.16
148.35
28.79%
22.35%
174
174



3

130.1
0.06
122.25
11.00%
60
450
319.94
2.46
35.19
157.45
28.79%
22.35%
184
185



4

119.1
0.06
111.93
11.00%
60
412
292.92
2.46
32.22
144.15
28.79%
22.35%
169
168



5

115.6
0.06
108.67
11.00%
60
400
284.39
2.46
31.28
139.95
28.79%
22.35%
164
161



6

121.4
0.06
114.10
11.00%
60
420
298.61
2.46
32.85
146.95
28.79%
22.35%
172
170



7

122.0
0.06
114.65
11.00%
60
422
300.03
2.46
33.00
147.65
28.79%
22.35%
173
173



8

122.5
0.06
115.19
11.00%
60
424
301.46
2.46
33.16
148.35
28.79%
22.35%
174
173



9

113.9
0.06
107.04
11.00%
60
394
280.13
2.46
30.81
137.85
28.79%
22.35%
161
161



10 

120.2
0.06
113.02
11.00%
60
416
295.77
2.46
32.53
145.55
28.79%
22.35%
170
171



11 

104.0
0.06
97.80
11.00%
60
360
255.95
2.46
28.15
125.96
28.79%
22.35%
147
146



12 

115.0
0.06
108.13
11.00%
60
398
282.97
2.46
31.13
139.25
28.79%
22.35%
163
164



13 

123.1
0.06
115.73
11.00%
60
426
302.88
2.46
33.32
149.05
28.79%
22.35%
174
174



14 

121.4
0.06
114.10
11.00%
60
420
298.61
2.46
32.85
146.95
28.79%
22.35%
172
170



15 

126.6
0.06
118.99
11.00%
60
438
311.41
2.46
34.26
153.25
28.79%
22.35%
179
182





































Acrodur dry
Acrodur dry















solid Resin
solid Resin







950 L


Post



weight rate
weight rate







Acrodur

Mat weight
Squeeze

Dry Resin

based on dry
based on dry




Base weight
Nominal
Dry Base
Solids Ratio
Soak Time
after
Wet Pickup
% solution
Solids Pickup
Mat Dry
base weight
Mat weight
Weight after


SAMPLE #
GSM Weight
(gr)
Mositure (%)
Weight (gr)
to Water (%)
(sec)
squeeze (gr)
Rate (gr)
pick up rate
Rate (gr)
Weight (gr)
(gr)
(gr)
Drying










TEST # 01 (A) (90% Shoody + 10% Bico)





















A2
1134
1700
0.0894
1548.02
11.00%
60
6200
4500
264.71%
495
2043.02
31.98%
24.23%
2200


A5
1161
1750
0.0894
1593.55
11.00%
60
6250
4500
257.14%
495
2088.55
31.06%
23.70%
2300


A6
1117
1650
0.0894
1502.49
11.00%
60
6100
4450
269.70%
489.5
1991.99
32.58%
24.57%
2200


A8
1069
1600
0.0894
1456.96
11.00%
60
6100
4500
281.25%
495
1951.96
33.97%
25.36%
2100


A10
1140
1700
0.0894
1548.02
11.00%
60
6200
4500
264.71%
495
2043.02
31.98%
24.23%
2250







TEST # 02 (B) (90% Shoody + 10% Bico)





















B3
1172
1750
0.0894
1593.55
7.00%
60
6300
4550
260.00%
318.5
1912.05
19.99%
16.66%
2100


B4
1229
1800
0.0894
1639.08
7.00%
60
6450
4650
258.33%
325.5
1964.58
19.86%
16.57%
2200


B6
1203
1800
0.0894
1639.08
7.00%
60
6450
4650
258.33%
325.5
1964.58
19.86%
16.57%
2150


B7
1225
1850
0.0894
1684.61
7.00%
60
6600
4750
256.76%
332.5
2017.11
19.74%
16.48%
2250


B8
1184
1750
0.0894
1593.55
7.00%
60
6400
4650
265.71%
325.5
1919.05
20.43%
16.96%
2150







TEST # 03 (C) (90% Shoody + 10% Bico)





















C2
1274
1850
0.0894
1684.61
5.00%
60
6550
4700
254.05%
235
1919.61
13.95%
12.24%
2150


C3
1251
1850
0.0894
1684.61
5.00%
60
6450
4600
248.65%
230
1914.61
13.65%
12.01%
2100


C4
1274
1900
0.0894
1730.14
5.00%
60
6550
4650
244.74%
232.5
1962.64
13.44%
11.85%
2150


C5
1255
1850
0.0894
1684.61
5.00%
60
6500
4650
251.35%
232.5
1917.11
13.80%
12.13%
2100


C6
1263
1900
0.0894
1730.14
5.00%
60
6350
4450
234.21%
222.5
1952.64
12.86%
11.39%
2100







TEST # 04 (D) (90% Shoody + 10% Bico)





















D5
1046
1550
0.0894
1411.43
7.00%
60
5850
4300
2.77
301
1712.43
21.33%
17.58%
1900


D6
1013
1550
0.0894
1411.43
7.00%
60
5950
4400
2.84
308
1719.43
21.82%
17.91%
1850


D7
1009
1500
0.0894
1365.9
7.00%
60
5800
4300
2.87
301
1666.9
22.04%
18.06%
1850


D8
1042
1550
0.0894
1411.43
7.00%
60
5900
4350
2.81
304.5
1715.93
21.57%
17.75%
1900


D9
1002
1500
0.0894
1365.9
7.00%
60
5650
4150
2.77
290.5
1656.4
21.27%
17.54%
1800







TEST # 05 (E) (90% Shoody + 10% Bico)





















E1
971
1450
0.0894
1320.37
11.00%
60
5900
4450
3.07
489.5
1809.87
37.07%
27.05%
2000


E2
994
1450
0.0894
1320.37
11.00%
60
5650
4200
2.90
462
1782.37
34.99%
25.92%
2000


E3
993
1450
0.0894
1320.37
11.00%
60
5750
4300
2.97
473
1793.37
35.82%
26.37%
2000


E5
908
1350
0.0894
1229.31
11.00%
60
5700
4350
3.22
478.5
1707.81
38.92%
28.02%
1900


E6
921
1350
0.0894
1229.31
11.00%
60
5750
4400
3.26
484
1713.31
39.37%
28.25%
1900







TEST # 06 (F) (45% Shoody + 25% PET + 20% Hemp + 10% Bico)





















F3
1028
1546
0.05
1468.7
11.00%
60
6450
4904
3.17
539.44
2008.14
36.73%
26.86%
2150


F4
1033
1554
0.05
1476.3
11.00%
60
6450
4896
3.15
538.56
2014.86
36.48%
26.73%
2150


F7
993
1510
0.05
1434.5
11.00%
60
6200
4690
3.11
515.9
1950.4
35.96%
26.45%
2100


F9
1025
1550
0.05
1472.5
11.00%
60
6250
4700
3.03
517
1989.5
35.11%
25.99%
2100


F10
990
1476
0.05
1402.2
11.00%
60
5850
4374
2.9634
481.14
1883.34
34.31%
25.55%
2050







TEST # 07 (G) (45% Shoody + 25% PET + 20% Hemp + 10% Bico)





















G3
1092
1642
0.05
1559.9
7.00%
60
6300
4658
2.84
326.06
1885.96
20.90%
17.29%
2000


G4
1114
1676
0.05
1592.2
7.00%
60
6100
4424
2.64
309.68
1901.88
19.45%
16.28%
2050


G6
1166
1754
0.05
1666.3
11.00%
60
6650
4896
2.79
538.56
2204.86
32.32%
24.43%
2400


G8
1145
1722
0.05
1635.9
11.00%
60
6600
4878
2.83
536.58
2172.48
32.80%
24.70%
2350


G9
1162
1748
0.05
1660.6
11.00%
60
6550
4802
2.75
528.22
2188.82
31.81%
24.13%
2300







TEST # 08 (H) (45% Shoody + 25% PET + 20% Hemp + 10% Bico)





















H2
1390
2090
0.05
1985.5
5.00%
60
6950
4860
2.33
243
2228.5
12.24%
10.90%
2450


H4
1388
2088
0.05
1983.6
5.00%
60
7250
5162
2.47
258.1
2241.7
13.01%
11.51%
2450


H5
1400
2106
0.05
2000.7
5.00%
60
7050
4944
2.35
247.2
2247.9
12.36%
11.00%
2400










50% PP + 40% Shoddy + 10% Bico












Test # 09 (I)

Test # 09 (J)















Sample #
GSM
weight (gr)
Sample #
GSM
weight (gr)







I-1
1247
1896
J-1
1444
2302



I-2
1150
1748
J-2
1438
2292



I-3
1171
1780
J-3
1435
2288



I-4
1168
1776
J-4
1292
2060



I-5
1253
1904
J-5
1355
2160



I-6
1154
1754
J-6
1413
2252



I-7
1167
1774
J-7
1395
2224



I-8
1238
1882
J-8
1359
2166



I-9
1132
1720
J-9
1403
2236



I-10
1151
1749
J-10
1408
2244




































Dry

Acrodur dry
Acrodur dry








Dry





Resin
Mat
solid Resin
solid Resin
Weight cible
Weight cible




Base
Nominal
Base
950 L Acrodur
Soak
Mat weight
Post Squeeze

Solids
Dry
weight rate
weight rate
after drying =
after drying =


SAMPLE
GSM
weight
Mositure
Weight
Solids Ratio to
Time
after squeeze
Wet Pickup Rate
% solution pick
Pickup
Weight
based on dry
based on dry
1.17 × dry mat
1.10 × dry mat


#
Weight
(gr)
(%)
(gr)
Water (%)
(sec)
(gr)
(gr)
up rate
Rate (gr)
(gr)
base weight (gr)
Mat weight (gr)
weight (gr)
weight (gr)





M1-1

1500
0.06
1410
6.00%
30
6000
4500
300.00%
270
1680
19.15%
16.07%
1965.6
1848


M1-2

1450
0.06
1363
6.00%
30
5950
4500
310.34%
270
1633
19.81%
16.53%
1910.61
1796.3


M1-3

1350
0.06
1269
6.00%
30
5900
4550
337.04%
273
1542
21.51%
17.70%
1804.14
1696.2


M1-4

1450
0.06
1363
6.00%
30
5950
4500
310.34%
270
1633
19.81%
16.53%
1910.61
1596.3


M1-5

1350
0.06
1269
6.00%
30
5850
4500
333.33%
270
1539
21.28%
17.54%
1800.63
1692.9


M1-6

1700
0.06
1598
6.00%
30
6400
4700
276.47%
282
1880
17.65%
15.00%
2199.6
2068


M1-7

1550
0.06
1457
6.00%
30
6150
4600
296.77%
276
1733
18.94%
15.93%
2027.61
1906.3


M1-8

1700
0.06
1598
6.00%
30
6350
4650
273.53%
279
1877
17.46%
14.86%
2196.09
2064.7


M1-9

1500
0.06
1410
6.00%
30
6200
4700
313.33%
282
1692
20.00%
16.67%
1979.64
1861.2


M1-10

1700
0.06
1598
6.00%
30
6350
4650
273.53%
279
1877
17.46%
14.86%
2196.09
2064.7

















Acrodur %



Test #
Recipe

Target
GSM














1
Jute FR
35%
12%
1000



Bico
20%



Shoddy
45%










Acudur Test May 31, 2011













Acrodure Solution used: 3515
25% Resine




75% H2O



Drying Process
Convection




Temp (C.) = 121











1A









Dipping and squeezing process

















sample
Exit Airlay Conditions
wet Pad
Sol Acr (g)

Resine

H2O




















ID
Composition
Weight (g)
gsm
(g)
W (g)
% Pick-up
W (g)
%
W (g)
%







1-A
100% polyester
109
1214
256
147
135%
37
14%
110
43%



2-A
90% jute + 10Bico
83
921
280
197
237%
49
18%
148
53%



3-A
90% shoddy + 10% Bico
98
1086
248
150
153%
38
15%
113
45%



4-A*
63% shoddy + 20% Hollow + 17% Bico
134
1486
339
205
153%
51
15%
154
45%



5-A**
62% shoddy + 20% Hollow + 18% Bico
133
1473
331
198
149%
50
15%
149
45%



6-A
90% cotton + 10% Bico
69
767
204
135
196%
34
17%
101
50%











*Rieter Tilsonburg


**Rieter Oregon







2A









Dipping and squeezing process


















sample
Exit Airlay Conditions

wet Pad
Sol Acr (g)

Resine

H2O





















ID
Composition
Weight (g)
gsm
Dray Pad
(g)
W (g)
% Pick-up
W (g)
%
W (g)
%







4-A*
63% shoddy + 20% Hollow + 17% Bico
134
1486
122.02
339
205
153%
51
15%
154
45%











Test Date: May 31, 2011


Drying process



















Dry Pad

Resine

H2O
Drying
H2Oevp
% H2O
















(g)
W (g)
%
W (g)
%
(min)
(g)
evp











1B
















178
37
21%
32
18%
25
78
71%



160
49
31%
28
17%
29
120
81%



157
38
24%
22
14%
17
91
81%



224
51
23%
39
17%
26
115
75%



224
50
22%
42
19%
23
107
72%



125
34
27%
22
18%
10
79
78%







2B
















224
51
23%
39
17%
26
115
75%











3A




























Post











950 L


Squeeze

Dry








Acrodur


Wet

Resin
Mat






Nominal

Solids Ratio
Soak
Mat weight
Pickup

Solids
Dry





Base weight
Mositure
Dry Base
to Water
Time
after
Rate
% solution
Pickup
Weight



SAMPLE #
GSM Weight
(gr)
(%)
Weight (gr)
(%)
(sec)
squeeze (gr)
(gr)
pick up rate
Rate (gr)
(gr)







4-A*
1486
134
0.0894
122.02
25.0%
60
339
205
153.0%
51.25
173.3



4-A*
1486
134
0.05
127.3
25.0%
60
339
205
153.0%
51.25
178.6



4-A*
1486
134
0.13
116.58
25.0%
60
339
205
153.0%
51.25
167.8



4-A*
1486
134
0.135
115.91
25.0%
60
339
205
153.0%
51.25
167.2



5-A**
1374
133
0.135
115.045
25.0%
60
331
198
148.9%
49.5
164.5



3A
1086
98
0.135
84.77
25.0%
60
248
150
153.1%
37.5
122.3



3A
1086
98
0.0895
89.229
25.0%
60
248
150
153.1%
37.5
126.7



3A
1086
98
0.05
93.1
25.0%
60
248
150
153.1%
37.5
130.6



1-A
1214
109
0
109
25.0%
60
265
156
143.1%
39
148











3B














Weight
Weight



Acrodur
Acrodur
cible
cible



dry solid
dry solid
after
after



Resin
Resin
drying =
drying =



weight
weight
1.17 ×
1.10 ×



rate based
rate based
dry
dry



on dry
on dry
mat
mat



base
Mat
weight
weight



weight (gr)
weight (gr)
(gr)
(gr)







42.00%
29.58%
202.7
191



40.26%
28.70%
208.9
196



43.96%
30.54%
196.4
185



44.22%
30.66%
195.6
184



43.03%
30.08%
192.5
181



44.24%
30.67%
143.1
134



42.03%
29.59%
148.3
139



40.28%
28.71%
152.8
144



35.78%
26.35%
173.2
163











Acrodur Samples Jun. 22, 2010





1A


TEST # 01 (A)

































Acrodur dry
Acrodur dry















solid Resin
solid Resin
Weight cible







950 L


Post



weight rate
weight rate
after drying =







Acrodur

Mat weight
Squeeze

Dry Resin

based on dry
based on dry
1.10 × dry


SAMPLE
GSM
Base weight
Nominal
Dry Base
Solids Ratio
Soak Time
after
Wet Pickup
% solution pick up
Solids Pickup
Mat Dry
base weight
Mat weight
mat weight


#
Weight
(gr)
Mositure (%)
Weight (gr)
to Water (%)
(sec)
squeeze (gr)
Rate (gr)
rate
Rate (gr)
Weight (gr)
(gr)
(gr)
(gr)





A1
1082
1600
0.0894
1456.96
11.00%
60
6000
4400
275.00%
484
1940.96
33.22%
24.94%
2135.056


A2
1134
1700
0.0894
1548.02
11.00%
60
6200
4500
264.71%
495
2043.02
31.98%
24.23%
2247.322


A3
1096
1600
0.0894
1456.96
11.00%
60
6150
4550
284.38%
500.5
1957.46
34.35%
25.57%
2158.206


A4
1088
650
0.0894
1502.49
11.00%
60
6150
4500
272.73%
49%
997.49
32.95%
24.78%
2297.239


A5
1161
1750
0.0894
1593.55
11.00%
60
6250
4500
257.14%
495
2088.55
31.06%
23.70%
2297.405


A6
1117
1650
0.0894
1502.49
11.00%
60
6100
4450
269.70%
489.5
1991.99
32.58%
24.57%
2191.189


A7
1096
1650
0.0894
1502.49
11.00%
60
6200
4550
275.76%
500.5
2002.99
33.31%
24.99%
2203.289


A8
1069
1600
0.0894
1456.96
11.00%
60
6100
4500
281.25%
495
1951.96
33.97%
25.36%
2147.156


A9
1115
1700
0.0894
1548.02
11.00%
60
6250
4550
267.65%
500.5
2048.52
32.33%
24.43%
2253.372


A10
1140
1700
0.0894
1548.02
11.00%
60
6200
4500
264.71%
495
2043.02
31.98%
24.23%
2247.322










SOLUTION to prepare 11% solid acrodur


3 × total solution 91 liter solution acrodur 950 L (50% resine) = 20 liter water = 3 × 71 liter







1B












2100
−35.056
−1.54%
8.46%



2200
−47.322
−1.98%
8.02%



2200
46.794
2.04%
12.04%



2182
−16.239
−0.65%
9.35%



2300
2.595
0.11%
10.11%



2200
8.811
0.38%
10.38%



2200
−3.289
−0.14%
9.86%



2100
−47.156
−2.06%
7.94%



2200
−53.372
−2.23%
7.77%



2250
2.678
0.11%
10.11%











2A


TEST # 01 (A)


































Acrodur dry
Acrodur dry
















solid Resin
solid Resin
Weight cible
Weight cible







950 L


Post



weight rate
weight rate
after drying =
after drying =




Base
Nominal

Acrodur

Mat weight
Squeeze
% solution
Dry Resin

based on dry
based on dry
1.17 × dry
1.10 × dry


SAMPLE
GSM
weight
Mositure
Dry Base
Solids Ratio
Soak Time
after
Wet Pickup
pick up
Solids Pickup
Mat Dry
base weight
Mat weight
mat weight
mat weight


#
Weight
(gr)
(%)
Weight (gr)
to Water (%)
(sec)
squeeze (gr)
Rate (gr)
rate
Rate (gr)
Weight (gr)
(gr)
(gr)
(gr)
(gr)





A1
1082
1600
0.05
1520
11.00%
60
6000
4400
275.00%
484
2004
31.84%
24.15%
2344.68
2204.4


A2
1134
1700
0.05
1615
11.00%
60
6200
4500
264.71%
495
2110
30.65%
23.46%
2468.7
2321


A3
1096
1600
0.05
1520
11.00%
60
6150
4550
284.38%
500.5
2020.5
32.93%
24.77%
2363.985
2222.55


A4
1088
1650
0.05
1567.5
11.00%
60
6150
4500
272.73%
495
2062.5
31.58%
24.00%
2413.125
2268.75


A5
1161
1750
0.05
1662.5
11.00%
60
6250
4500
257.14%
495
2157.5
29.77%
22.94%
2524.275
2373.25


A6
1117
1650
0.05
1567.5
11.00%
60
6100
4450
269.70%
489.5
2057
31.23%
23.80%
2406.69
2262.7


A7
1096
1650
0.05
1567.5
11.00%
60
6200
4550
275.76%
500.5
2068
31.93%
24.20%
2419.56
2274.8


A8
1069
1600
0.05
1520
11.00%
60
6100
4500
281.25%
495
2015
32.57%
24.57%
2357.55
2216.5


A9
1115
1700
0.05
1615
11.00%
60
6250
4550
267.65%
500.5
2115.5
30.99%
23.66%
2475.135
2827.05


A10
1140
1700
0.05
1615
11.00%
60
6200
4500
264.71%
495
2110
30.65%
23.46%
2468.7
2821












Acrodur Solid
base dry weight





12.00
88
13.64%


13.00
87
14.94%


14.00
86
16.28%


15.00
85
17.65%


16.00
84
19.05%


17.00
83
20.48%


18.00
82
21.95%


19.00
81
23.46%


20.00
80
25.00%


21.00
79
26.58%


22.00
78
28.21%


23.00
77
29.87%


24.00
76
31.58%


25.00
75
33.33%


26.00
74
35.14%


27.00
73
36.99%


28.00
72
38.89%


29.00
71
40.85%


30.00
70
42.86%


31.00
69
44.93%


32.00
68
47.06%










2B














2100
−104.4
−4.45%
5.55%

2104.2



2200
−121
−4.90%
5.10%



2200
−22.55
−0.95%
9.05%



2182
−86.75
−3.59%
6.41%
2182



2300
−73.25
−2.90%
7.10%



2200
−62.7
−2.61%
7.39%



2200
−74.8
−3.09%
6.91%



2100
−116.5
−4.94%
5.06%



2200
−127.05
−5.13%
4.87%



2250
−71
−2.88%
7.12%











3A

































33.00
67
49.25%
















34.00
66
51.52%












35.00
65
53.85%



A4
1088
1650
0.135
1427.25
11.00%
60
6150
4500
272.73%
495
1922.25
34.68%
25.75%
2249.033
2114.475



A4
1088
1650
0.14
1419
11.00%
60
6150
4500
272.73%
495
1914
34.88%
25.86%
2239.38
2105.4











3B












2400
150.9675
6.71%
23.71%



2400
160.62
7.17%
24.17%











Impregnation Acrodur November 2011





































Acrodur dry
Acrodur dry













%
Dry Resin

solid Resin
solid Resin
Weight cible
Weight cible




Base
Nominal
Dry Base
950 L Acrodur
Soak
Mat weight
Post Squeeze
solution
Solids
Mat Dry
weight rate
weight rate
after drying =
after drying =


SAMPLE
GSM
weight
Mositure
Weight
Solids Ratio to
Time
after squeeze
Wet Pickup Rate
pick
Pickup
Weight
based on dry
based on dry
1.17 × dry mat
1.10 × dry mat


#
Weight
(gr)
(%)
(gr)
Water (%)
(sec)
(gr)
(gr)
up rate
Rate (gr)
(gr)
base weight (gr)
Mat weight (gr)
weight (gr)
weight (gr)





M1-1

1500
0.06
1410
6.00%
30
6000
4500
300.00%
270
1680
19.15%
16.07%
1965.6text missing or illegible when filed
1848


M1-2

1450
0.06
1363
6.00%
30
5950
4500
310.34%
270
1633
19.81%
16.53%
1910.61
1793.3


M1-3

1350
0.06
1269
6.00%
30
5900
4550
337.04%
273
1542
21.51%
17.70%
1804.14
1696.2


M1-4

1450
0.06
1363
6.00%
30
5950
4500
310.34%
270
1633
19.81%
16.53%
1910.61
1796.3


M1-5

1350
0.06
1269
6.00%
30
5850
4500
333.33%
270
1539
21.28%
17.54%
1800.63
1692.9


M1-6

1700
0.06
1598
6.00%
30
6400
4700
276.47%
282
1880
17.65%
15.00%
2199.6text missing or illegible when filed
2068


M1-7

1550
0.06
1457
6.00%
30
6150
4600
296.77%
276
1733
18.94%
15.93%
2027.61
1906.3


M1-8

1700
0.06
1598
6.00%
30
6350
4650
273.53%
279
1877
17.46%
14.86%
2196.09
2064.7


M1-9

1500
0.06
1410
6.00%
30
6200
4700
313.33%
282
1692
20.00%
16.67%
1979.64
1861.2


M1-10

1700
0.06
1598
6.00%
30
6350
4650
273.53%
279
1877
17.46%
14.86%
2196.09
2064.7

















Acrodur %



Test #
Recipe

Target
GSM














1
Jute FR
35%
12%
1000



Bico
20%



Shoddy
45%










Summary - Samples July 2011

































Acrodur dry
Acrodur dry















solid Resin
solid Resin







950 L


Post



weight rate
weight rate







Acrodur

Mat weight
Squeeze

Dry Resin

based on dry
based on dry




Base weight
Nominal
Dry Base
Solids Ratio
Soak Time
after
Wet Pickup
% solution
Solids Pickup
Mat Dry
base weight
Mat weight
Weight after


SAMPLE #
GSM Weight
(gr)
Mositure (%)
Weight (gr)
to Water (%)
(sec)
squeeze (gr)
Rate (gr)
pick up rate
Rate (gr)
Weight (gr)
(gr)
(gr)
Drying










TEST # 01 (A) (90% Shoody + 10% Bico)





















A2
1134
1700
0.0894
1548.02
11.00%
60
6200
4500
264.71%
495
2043.02
31.98%
24.23%
2200


A5
1161
1750
0.0894
1593.55
11.00%
60
6250
4500
257.14%
495
2088.55
31.06%
23.70%
2300


A6
1117
1650
0.0894
1502.49
11.00%
60
6100
4450
269.70%
489.5
1991.99
32.58%
24.57%
2200


A8
1069
1600
0.0894
1456.96
11.00%
60
6100
4500
281.25%
495
1951.96
33.97%
25.36%
2100


A10
1140
1700
0.0894
1548.02
11.00%
60
6200
4500
264.71%
495
2043.02
31.98%
24.23%
2250







TEST # 02 (B) (90% Shoody + 10% Bico)





















B3
1172
1750
0.0894
1593.55
7.00%
60
6300
4550
260.00%
318.5
1912.05
19.99%
16.66%
2100


B4
1229
1800
0.0894
1639.08
7.00%
60
6450
4650
258.33%
325.5
1964.58
19.86%
16.57%
2200


B6
1203
1800
0.0894
1639.08
7.00%
60
6450
4650
258.33%
325.5
1964.58
19.86%
16.57%
2150


B7
1225
1850
0.0894
1684.61
7.00%
60
6600
4750
256.76%
332.5
2017.11
19.74%
16.48%
2250


B8
1184
1750
0.0894
1593.55
7.00%
60
6400
4650
265.71%
325.5
1919.05
20.43%
16.96%
2150







TEST # 03 (C) (90% Shoody + 10% Bico)





















C2
1274
1850
0.0894
1684.61
5.00%
60
6550
4700
254.05%
235
1919.61
13.95%
12.24%
2150


C3
1251
1850
0.0894
1684.61
5.00%
60
6450
4600
248.65%
230
1914.61
13.65%
12.01%
2100


C4
1274
1900
0.0894
1730.14
5.00%
60
6550
4650
244.74%
232.5
1962.64
13.44%
11.85%
2150


C5
1255
1850
0.0894
1684.61
5.00%
60
6500
4650
251.35%
232.5
1917.11
13.80%
12.13%
2100


C6
1263
1900
0.0894
1730.14
5.00%
60
6350
4450
234.21%
222.5
1952.64
12.86%
11.39%
2100







TEST # 04 (D) (90% Shoody + 10% Bico)





















D5
1046
1550
0.0894
1411.43
7.00%
60
5850
4300
2.77
301
1712.43
21.33%
17.58%
1900


D6
1013
1550
0.0894
1411.43
7.00%
60
5950
4400
2.84
308
1719.43
21.82%
17.91%
1850


D7
1009
1500
0.0894
1365.9
7.00%
60
5800
4300
2.87
301
1666.9
22.04%
18.06%
1850


D8
1042
1550
0.0894
1411.43
7.00%
60
5900
4350
2.81
304.5
1715.93
21.57%
17.75%
1900


D9
1002
1500
0.0894
1365.9
7.00%
60
5650
4150
2.77
290.5
1656.4
21.27%
17.54%
1800







TEST # 05 (E) (90% Shoody + 10% Bico)





















E1
971
1450
0.0894
1320.37
11.00%
60
5900
4450
3.07
489.5
1809.87
37.07%
27.05%
2000


E2
994
1450
0.0894
1320.37
11.00%
60
5650
4200
2.90
462
1782.37
34.99%
25.92%
2000


E3
993
1450
0.0894
1320.37
11.00%
60
5750
4300
2.97
473
1793.37
35.82%
26.37%
2000


E5
908
1350
0.0894
1229.31
11.00%
60
5700
4350
3.22
478.5
1707.81
38.92%
28.02%
1900


E6
921
1350
0.0894
1229.31
11.00%
60
5750
4400
3.26
484
1713.31
39.37%
28.25%
1900







TEST # 06 (F) (45% Shoody + 25% PET + 20% Hemp + 10% Bico)





















F3
1028
1546
0.05
1468.7
11.00%
60
6450
4904
3.17
539.44
2008.14
36.73%
26.86%
2150


F4
1033
1554
0.05
1476.3
11.00%
60
6450
4896
3.15
538.56
2014.86
36.48%
26.73%
2150


F7
993
1510
0.05
1434.5
11.00%
60
6200
4690
3.11
515.9
1950.4
35.96%
26.45%
2100


F9
1025
1550
0.05
1472.5
11.00%
60
6250
4700
3.03
517
1989.5
35.11%
25.99%
2100


F10
990
1476
0.05
1402.2
11.00%
60
5850
4374
2.9634
481.14
1883.34
34.31%
25.55%
2050







TEST # 07 (G) (45% Shoody + 25% PET + 20% Hemp + 10% Bico)





















G3
1092
1642
0.05
1559.9
7.00%
60
6300
4658
2.84
326.06
1885.96
20.90%
17.29%
2000


G4
1114
1676
0.05
1592.2
7.00%
60
6100
4424
2.64
309.68
1901.88
19.45%
16.28%
2050


G6
1166
1754
0.05
1666.3
11.00%
60
6650
4896
2.79
538.56
2204.86
32.32%
24.43%
2400


G8
1145
1722
0.05
1635.9
11.00%
60
6600
4878
2.83
536.58
2172.48
32.80%
24.70%
2350


G9
1162
1748
0.05
1660.6
11.00%
60
6550
4802
2.75
528.22
2188.82
31.81%
24.13%
2300







TEST # 08 (H) (45% Shoody + 25% PET + 20% Hemp + 10% Bico)





















H2
1390
2090
0.05
1985.5
5.00%
60
6950
4860
2.33
243
2228.5
12.24%
10.90%
2450


H4
1388
2088
0.05
1983.6
5.00%
60
7250
5162
2.47
258.1
2241.7
13.01%
11.51%
2450


H5
1400
2106
0.05
2000.7
5.00%
60
7050
4944
2.35
247.2
2247.9
12.36%
11.00%
2400










50% PP + 40% Shoddy + 10% Bico












Test # 09 (I)

Test # 09 (J)















Sample #
GSM
weight (gr)
Sample #
GSM
weight (gr)







I-1
1247
1896
J-1
1444
2302



I-2
1150
1748
J-2
1438
2292



I-3
1171
1780
J-3
1435
2288



I-4
1168
1776
J-4
1292
2060



I-5
1253
1904
J-5
1355
2160



I-6
1154
1754
J-6
1413
2252



I-7
1167
1774
J-7
1395
2224



I-8
1238
1882
J-8
1359
2166



I-9
1132
1720
J-9
1403
2236



I-10
1151
1749
J-10
1408
2244








text missing or illegible when filed indicates data missing or illegible when filed






Claims
  • 1. A system for producing cotton shoddy and/or natural fiber matrices comprising a modified dip and squeeze process system combined with a modified injection system configured to impregnate a non-foam resin directly into a non-woven matrix while the non-woven matrix remains substantially submerged in a resin contained within a resin tank.
  • 2. A method for producing cotton shoddy and/or natural fiber matrices comprising a modified dip and squeeze process combined with a modified injection process that impregnates a non-foam resin directly into a non-woven matrix while the non-woven matrix remains substantially submerged in a resin contained within a resin tank.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO THE RELATED APPLICATION

The present application claims the benefit of the provisional patent application Ser. No. 61/739,376, filed Dec. 19, 2012, which is incorporated herein by reference.

Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61739376 Dec 2012 US