A resin product includes a resin base material, and a luster metallic coating film provided on the resin base material. The metallic coating film is made of indium, and has a discontinuous structure.
The resin product also includes a corrosion-resistant protective film that improves the corrosion resistance of the metallic coating film. The corrosion-resistant protective film is made of at least one of silicon oxynitride, aluminum nitride, aluminum oxynitride, and chromium oxide, and is provided only in a position under the metallic coating film.
Another resin product includes a resin base material, and a luster metallic coating film provided on the resin base material. The metallic coating film is made of tin, and has a discontinuous structure.
The resin product also includes a corrosion-resistant protective film that improves the corrosion resistance of the metallic coating film. The corrosion-resistant protective film is made of at least one of silicon oxynitride, aluminum nitride, aluminum oxynitride, and chromium oxide, and is provided in at least one of a position on the metallic coating film and a position under the metallic coating film.
Examples and comparative examples of the metallic coating film on a resin base material (substrate) made of polycarbonate, as shown in Table 1 below, will be explained below. The examples and comparative examples vary according to the type of the metallic coating film, the method by which the metallic coating film was formed, the presence or absence of the corrosion-resistant protective film which is provided on or under the metallic coating film, the type of the corrosion-resistant protective film, and the method by which the corrosion-resistant protective film was formed. Note that the examples of the present invention and the comparative examples are divided into nine groups by study item.
As shown in
In this example, oxynitride films were formed, and their nitrogen content ratios were measured, as described below.
(a) Film-Forming Method
Films of silicon oxynitride and aluminum oxynitride were formed as described below.
A film of silicon oxynitride (SiOxNy) formed by spattering, using silicon (Si) in a target and using the partial pressures of nitrogen (N2) and oxygen (O2) in the atmosphere to control the composition.
A film of silicon oxynitride (SiOxNy) formed by ion plating, using silicon nitride (Si3N4) in an evaporation material and using an output of an RF plasma in a nitrogen (N2) (oxygen (O2)) atmosphere to control the composition.
A film of silicon oxynitride (SiOxNy) formed by vacuum vapor deposition, using silicon nitride (Si3N4) in an evaporation material.
A film of aluminum oxynitride (AlOxNy) formed by spattering, using aluminum (Al) in a target and using the partial pressures of nitrogen (N2) and oxygen (O2) in the atmosphere to control the composition.
A film of aluminum oxynitride (AlOxNy) formed by ion plating, using aluminum nitride (AlN) in an evaporation material and using an output of an RF plasma in a nitrogen (N2) atmosphere to control the composition.
(b) Nitrogen Content Ratios
The nitrogen content ratios (N/(O+N)) of the films were measured by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS).
In this group of examples, the indium metallic coating film 12 was formed by vacuum vapor deposition. Silicon oxide, aluminum oxide, aluminum nitride, titanium oxide, cerium oxide, zirconium oxide, and zinc sulfide films formed by ion plating were provided as the underlying corrosion-resistant protective films 13. The press coating film 15 was provided over the indium metallic coating film 12. In the comparative example, the underlying corrosion-resistant protective film 13 was not provided.
In this group of examples, the metallic coating film 12 was changed to tin formed by vacuum vapor deposition, in contrast to group la. The underlying corrosion-resistant protective films 13 were changed to films of silicon oxynitride formed by spattering and aluminum oxide formed by vacuum vapor deposition. In the comparative example, the underlying corrosion-resistant protective film 13 was not provided.
In this group of examples, the tin metallic coating film 12 was formed by vacuum vapor deposition. Silicon oxynitride films (including silicon oxide and silicon nitride) formed by vacuum vapor deposition and by ion plating, and having different nitrogen content ratios, were provided as the underlying corrosion-resistant protective films 13. In the comparative example, the underlying corrosion-resistant protective film 13 was not provided.
In this group of examples, in contrast to group 2a, the metallic coating film 12 was changed to indium formed by spattering, and the press coating film 15 was provided over the indium metallic coating film 12. In the comparative example, the underlying corrosion-resistant protective film 13 was not provided.
In this group of examples, the indium metallic coating film 12 was formed by vacuum vapor deposition. Aluminum oxynitride films (including aluminum oxide and aluminum nitride) formed by ion plating, and having different nitrogen content ratios, were provided as the underlying corrosion-resistant protective films 13. The press coating film 15 was provided over the indium metallic coating film 12. In the comparative example, the underlying corrosion-resistant protective film 13 was not provided.
In this group of examples, in contrast to group 3a, the thickness of the indium metallic coating film 12 was increased, and the underlying corrosion-resistant protective films 13 were changed to silicon oxide films formed by ion plating. In the comparative example, the underlying corrosion-resistant protective film 13 was not provided.
In this group of examples, the indium metallic coating film 12 was formed by vacuum vapor deposition. A chromium oxide film formed by ion plating was provided as the underlying corrosion-resistant protective film 13. In the comparative example, the underlying corrosion-resistant protective film 13 was not provided.
In this group of examples, in contrast to group 4a, the metallic coating film 12 was changed to tin formed by vacuum vapor deposition. Both the underlying and overlying corrosion-resistant protective films 13, 14 made of chromium oxide were provided, and the thicknesses of the underlying and overlying corrosion-resistant protective films 13, 14 were varied. In the comparative example, the underlying and overlying corrosion-resistant protective films 13, 14 were not provided.
In this group of examples, the underlying corrosion-resistant protective film 13 was not provided. Only the overlying corrosion-resistant protective film 14, made of silicon oxynitride and formed by spattering, was provided on the tin metallic coating film 12 formed by vacuum vapor deposition. In one comparative example, neither of the underlying and overlying corrosion-resistant protective films 13, 14 was provided. In the other comparative examples, the overlying corrosion-resistant protective film 14, made of aluminum oxynitride and formed by vacuum vapor deposition, was provided.
Moisture resistance was tested in order to evaluate corrosion resistance (environmental resistance).
(a) Test Conditions
Moisture resistance was tested under the following conditions:
Humidity: 98% to 100%
Temperature: 40° C.
Time: 480 hours
(b) Evaluation Methods
Amount of change in transmittance
In cases where the press coating film was not provided, as shown in
Color change: ΔE (Change in hue)
In cases where the press coating film was provided, as shown in
ΔE=√{square root over ((ΔL)2+(Δa)2+(Δb)2)}{square root over ((ΔL)2+(Δa)2+(Δb)2)}{square root over ((ΔL)2+(Δa)2+(Δb)2)} Equation 1
ΔL: Luminance difference
Δa: Chromaticity difference (red-green direction)
Δb: Chromaticity difference (yellow-blue direction)
The evaluations were conducted as described below.
(a) As shown by the results for group 1a and group 1b, in the examples which were provided with the underlying corrosion-resistant protective film 13, the corrosion resistance was improved in comparison to the comparative examples which was not provided with the underlying corrosion-resistant protective film 13. In the examples, in which the film made of aluminum oxide (by vacuum vapor deposition), silicon oxide, cerium oxide, zirconium oxide, tinanium oxide, silicon oxynitride, or zinc sulfide was used as the underlying corrosion-resistant protective film 13, the improvement in the corrosion resistance was smaller than the other examples. This is considered to be due to the low denseness of the film and the effects of damage to the film from the oxygen and oxygen plasmas during the formation of the film.
(b) As shown by the results for group 2a, group 2b, group 3a, and group 3b, in the examples, in which the film made of silicon oxynitride, aluminum oxynitride or the like was used as the underlying corrosion-resistant protective film 13, the corrosion resistance was improved in comparison to the comparative examples which was not provided with the underlying corrosion-resistant protective film 13. In the examples, in which the film made of silicon nitride or aluminum nitride was used as the underlying corrosion-resistant protective film 13, the improvement in the corrosion resistance was smaller than the other examples. This is considered to be due to the effects of damage to the film from the high-output plasmas that are required during the formation of the film.
(c) As shown by the results for group 4a and group 4b, in the examples, in which the film or films made of chromium oxide was used as the underlying corrosion-resistant protective film 13 or the underlying and overlying corrosion-resistant protective films 13, 14, respectively, the corrosion resistance was improved in comparison to the comparative examples which were not provided with the underlying or overlying corrosion-resistant protective film 13, 14.
(d) The results for group 5 showed an effect of the corrosion resistance with a nitrogen content ratio of 60 mol % in the silicon oxynitride.
The adhesion (abrasion resistance) between the metallic coating film 12 and the resin base material 11 was evaluated by conducting a gauze abrasion test using a test material of group 2b.
(a) Test Conditions
The gauze abrasion test was conducted under the following conditions:
A (100% cotton) gauze 12 mm wide was used as an abrasive material. A load of 6.9 N was applied to the gauze, and the gauze was moved reciprocally 100 times over a distance of 30 mm.
(b) Evaluation Method
Amount of change in transmittance
The transmittance was measured as described above. The gauze abrasion test reduces the thickness of the metallic coating film 12 (luster layer), increasing the transmittance of the light. Accordingly, the transmittance was measured before and after the gauze abrasion test to determine the amount of change in the transmittance from before the test to after the test. The amount of change in the transmittance was then used as the evaluation of adhesion.
It was seen that the adhesion increased to the extent that the nitrogen content ratio of the silicon oxynitride increased.
Note that the present invention is not limited by the examples described above, and that the structure of each part may be freely modified without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
JP2006-264910 | Sep 2006 | JP | national |