Resistance measurement system and method of using the same

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9085464
  • Patent Number
    9,085,464
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, March 7, 2012
    12 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, July 21, 2015
    9 years ago
Abstract
A quality control system for the manufacture of carbon nanostructure-laden substrates includes a resistance measurement module for continuously measuring resistance of the carbon nanostructure (CNS)-laden substrate.
Description
BACKGROUND

The present invention relates to systems and methods used in the manufacture of carbon nanostructure-laden materials, and more specifically to measuring the resistance of carbon nanostructure-laden materials during their manufacture.


High-performance materials incorporating carbon nanostructures (CNSs) are becoming increasingly important industrially. CNSs may impart desirable properties to composites, for example, such as enhanced mechanical strength, and thermal and electrical conductivity. The small diameter and robust individual carbon-carbon bonds of carbon nanotubes (CNTs), in particular, provide stiffness, strength, and thermal conductivity which exceed most known natural and synthetic materials.


In order to harness these properties, a continuing challenge has been to reliably incorporate CNTs and other CNSs into various structures, preferably in a controlled and ordered fashion. While the preparation of CNTs, in particular, has been successfully scaled up, employing loose CNTs has been problematic due, at least in part, to their tendency to agglomerate. Moreover, when combined in a typical matrix material, CNT loading can be severely limited by the concomitant increases in viscosity, ultimately putting an upper limit on the amount of CNTs that can be placed in the matrix material. As a consequence, there has been increased interest in the preparation of CNTs on various substrates as scaffolds to pre-organize the CNTs and to allow access to higher CNT loadings.


As the means for synthesizing CNSs, such as CNTs, on a variety of substrates begins to mature and industrial scale up begins to take hold, it will be beneficial to put into place measures to ensure quality control of the materials being prepared. Although there are means for analyzing CNT loading of a substrate, there are no real-time quantitative evaluations adapted for in-line use. CNT loading evaluation methods include, for example, thermogravimetric analysis employing CNT burnoff, measuring mass per unit length, and the use of scanning electron microscope (SEM) techniques. Currently, such evaluations are done “offline,” that is, after the material is prepared and via random sampling.


Thermogravimetric analysis employs random sampling and destroys the very substrate being prepared. Measuring mass per unit length provides only an averaged evaluation of loading over an entire stretch of substrate and is difficult to employ real-time and fails to identify regions that may not be up to quality standards. Similarly, SEM techniques are inadequate for large scale quality control assurance, because only random samplings of the CNS-laden substrate are evaluated. Each of these post synthesis analyses may be inadequate to detect problems that may occur, for example, during a long synthesis run. Moreover, the use of CNS-laden materials that may have undesirable imperfections, such as regions of poor CNS coverage, may be catastrophic under high stress conditions of certain downstream applications.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to systems and methods used in the manufacture of carbon nanostructure-laden materials, and more specifically to measuring the resistance of carbon nanostructure-laden materials during their manufacture.


In some embodiments, the present invention provides a quality control system for the manufacture of carbon nanostructure (CNS)-laden substrates comprising a resistance measurement module for continuously measuring the resistance of the (CNS)-laden substrate.


In some embodiments, the present invention provides a method comprising continuously synthesizing carbon nanostructures (CNSs) on a substrate in a CNS growth chamber to provide a CNS-laden substrate and continuously monitoring the resistance of the CNS-laden substrate exiting a distal end of the growth chamber.


The features and advantages of the present invention will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art upon a reading of the description of the various embodiments that follows.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The following figures are included to illustrate certain aspects of the present invention, and should not be viewed as exclusive embodiments. The subject matter disclosed is capable of considerable modification, alteration, and equivalents in form and function, as will occur to those skilled in the art and having the benefit of this disclosure.



FIG. 1 shows a plot correlating carbon nanostructure loading with substrate resistance for CNS-infused fiberglass tow in a range in which about 10 percent to about 25 percent of the fiber weight consisted of CNS.



FIG. 2
a shows a system comprising a resistance measurement module comprising an electric field- or inductive-based device for measurement of resistance.



FIG. 2
b shows a system comprising a resistance measurement module comprising a conducting rollers linked to a resistance measurement device.



FIG. 3 shows a system comprising a resistance measurement module in the context of a continuous CNS growth process.



FIGS. 4
a-g show exemplary embodiments of a system employing four conductive rollers for measuring resistance of a CNS-laden substrate, in accordance with embodiments disclosed herein.



FIG. 5
a-c show the four roller system of FIG. 4a having variable lateral spacing of the conductive rollers, in accordance with embodiments disclosed herein.



FIG. 6 shows a plot corresponding to carbon nanostructure loading with substrate resistance for CNS-infused fiberglass tow in a range in which about 5 percent to about 15 percent of the fiber weight consisted of CNS.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The present invention relates to systems and methods used in the manufacture of carbon nanostructure-laden materials, and more specifically to measuring the resistance of carbon nanostructure-laden materials during their manufacture. In particular, embodiments disclosed herein provide a means of assessing the quality of CNS-laden substrates in real time. That is, the systems and methods employed in various embodiments allow for integration of a quality assessment system in-line as part of the CNS preparation process. This may be accomplished via a resistance measurement module that continuously measures the resistance of a moving substrate onto which CNS structures are being synthesized. Advantageously, when run in real-time in a continuous mode during CNS preparation, feedback mechanisms are readily incorporated and such feedback is reportable to an operator, other instrumentation (such as a CNS growth chamber/module), or both, so that the synthesis conditions may be altered, or, as necessary, operations halted.


Although beneficial to run such assessments in real-time, the resistance measurement module disclosed herein can also stand alone and can be useful for evaluating bulk quantities of materials that may have been prepared elsewhere. This is readily accomplished by independently running the CNS-laden substrate through the resistance measurement module, for example, in a simple spool to spool arrangement with the intervening resistance measurement module. Thus, the evaluation of CNS loading need not be limited to real-time evaluation during synthesis.


The systems and methods disclosed herein are sufficiently versatile that they can be used to evaluate CNS loading values for CNSs grown on a variety of substrates. Systems and methods disclosed herein are particularly well-suited to evaluating CNS growth on fibrous substrates, including, without limitation, carbon, glass, quartz, ceramic, aramids, such as Kevlar, basalt, and metal fibers. Metallic substrates may include, without limitation, aluminum, copper, and steel, for example. Fibrous substrates can take on numerous forms including, without limitation, fibers, tows, yarns, fabrics, tapes, and the like. Other forms, which may be common for metallic substrates include, without limitation plates, foils, thin films, meshes, wires, and the like.


Without being bound by theory, the presence of CNSs on a substrate, regardless of the substrate type, can alter the resistance of the substrate. Such alteration in resistance can be observed for non-conductive substrates such as glass fiber for which the substrate is altered from being electrically insulating to being a conductor as CNS loading is increased. That is, the resistance of the substrate decreases with increased in CNS loading. Such a correlation between CNS loading and resistance has been demonstrated as indicated in FIG. 1.


Similar correlations hold for electrically conductive substrates such as carbon fiber for which the substrate may have a bulk conductivity greater than the CNSs grown thereon. In some such embodiments, the resistance may actually increase with increased CNS loading. Regardless of the substrate, the presence of CNSs on a substrate can alter the resistance value and thus, provides a means for correlation to a CNS loading value.


Finally, methods and systems disclosed herein offer the ability to capture CNS loading values on a moving substrate without stopping the line, providing both quality assurance and reduced production times. Data can be collected at very high acquisition rates with multiple readings per second. The systems and methods can be utilized independently of the linespeed of operation, whether the line is moving, for example, at 100 ft/min, 1 ft/min or even if the line has been temporarily stopped i.e. 0 ft/min. During long synthesis runs, methods and systems disclosed herein have the ability to detect changes in loading in real-time continuously throughout a given run providing a means for assessing consistency of CNS growth on manufacturing scale.


As used herein, the term “linespeed” refers to the speed at which a substrate of spoolable dimensions can be fed through the CNS infusion processes described herein, where linespeed is a velocity determined by dividing CNS chamber(s) length by the material residence time.


As used herein the term “spoolable dimensions” refers to fiber, ribbon, tapes, sheet, mesh and similar materials having at least one dimension that is not limited in length, allowing for the material to be stored on a spool or mandrel. Materials of “spoolable dimensions” have at least one dimension that indicates the use of either batch or continuous processing for CNS infusion as described herein. Commercial fiber roving, in particular, can be obtained on 1 oz, ¼, ½, 1, 5, 10, 25 lb, and greater spools, for example. Processes of the invention operate readily with 1 to 25 lb. spools, although larger spools are usable. Moreover, a pre-process operation can be incorporated that divides very large spoolable lengths, for example 100 lb. or more, into easy to handle dimensions, such as two 50 lb spools.


As used herein, the term “carbon nanostructure” (CNS, plural CNSs) refers to a nanostructured carbon network that includes elements of carbon nanotube structure in a complex morphology which can include any combination of branching, entanglement, and the like, while still providing typical mechanical, thermal, and electrical properties to substrates on which they are infused.


As used herein, the term “carbon nanotube” (CNT, plural CNTs) refers to any of a number of cylindrically-shaped allotropes of carbon of the fullerene family including single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWNTs), double-walled carbon nanotubes (DWNTS), multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWNTs). CNTs can be capped by a fullerene-like structure or open-ended. CNSs include those that encapsulate other materials.


As used herein, the term “carbon nanostructure (CNS)-laden substrate” refers to any substrate onto which carbon nanostructures have been infused.


As used herein, the term “infused” means bonded and “infusion” means the process of bonding. Such bonding can involve direct covalent bonding, ionic bonding, pi-pi, and/or van der Waals force-mediated physisorption. For example, CNSs may be infused directly to the substrate whose resistance is to be measured.


As used herein, the term “material residence time” refers to the amount of time a discrete point along a substrate of spoolable dimensions is exposed to CNS growth conditions during the CNS infusion processes described herein. This definition includes the residence time when employing multiple CNS growth chambers.


In some embodiments, the present invention provides a quality control system for the manufacture of carbon nanostructure-laden substrates comprising a resistance measurement module for continuously measuring resistance of the carbon nanostructure (CNS)-laden substrate. In some embodiments, the resistance measurement module measures resistance via an electric field or inductive based measurement. Referring now to FIG. 2(a), there is shown a system 200 having a resistance module 210 configured to received a substrate 205 from a source 220. After measurement of resistance via an electric field or inductive based measurement via device 240 within resistance measurement module 210, substrate 205 is delivered to a take-up spool or mandrel 230. Source 220 can be any supply of a substrate for which resistance measurement is desired. In some embodiments source 220 is a CNS growth chamber. In other embodiments, source 220 is another spool or other holding source for delivery of substrate 205 to resistance measurement module 210. In some embodiments, source 220 can house any substrate 205 for which measurement of resistance is desired and substrate 205 need not be limited to CNS-laden substrates. In the configuration of FIG. 2a, device 240 may supply an electric or magnetic field of known strength across a length of substrate 205, inducing a current in substrate 205. In some such embodiments, device 240 may comprise a current clamp. Measurement of the induced current and voltage allows calculation of resistance according to Ohm's law V=IR.


As shown in FIG. 2(b), in some embodiments, resistance measurement module 210 comprises at least a two point conductive contact 250 with CNS-laden substrate 205. In use, substrate 205 is delivered to resistance measurement module 210 and at least a two point contact 250 is electronically linked to a resistance measurement device 260, such as an ohmmeter to provide real time measurement across a fixed length of substrate 205. In some embodiments, the length between at least two contact points can be selected by the operator. In some embodiments, the resistance measurement module 210 can be configured with movable conductive contacts 250, relative to each other, so that the length over which resistance is measured can be changed. In some such embodiments, alteration in the length can be performed manually, while in other embodiments, the length can altered in conjunction with a computer-assisted interface. In yet still further embodiments, the length between conductive contacts 250 can be programmed. In some embodiments, the length over which resistance is measured can be in a range from about 1 millimeter to about 1 meter. One skilled in the art will appreciate that shorter lengths between conductive contacts 250 may provide more variability in the resistance measurements as a function of time. Likewise, at larger lengths between conductive contacts 250, the variability may be smaller as the resistance being measured approaches the average of the bulk material and imperfections may be averaged out. In some embodiments, therefore, it may be desirable to maintain short lengths between conductive contacts 250, such as between about 1 millimeter to about 10 cm.


In some embodiments, spacing between contacts both vertically (i.e. laterally, see roller examples in FIG. 5) and horizontally are used to modulate the tension of the substrate as it goes over the contact points in order to optimize the resistance measurement. The tension can thus be regulated during winding of the substrate as it passes from source 220 to take up spool or mandrel 230.


In some embodiments, conductive contacts 250 can be configured to move along substrate 205. In some such embodiments, substrate 205 may be stationary. In other embodiments conductive contacts 250 can be configured to move along substrate 205 which is in motion. In some such embodiments, the direction of the moving conductive contacts 250 may be against the direction of the movement of substrate 205. In some embodiments, conductive contacts 250 may be configured to scan back and forth along substrate 205 while it is in motion. In some embodiments, two point conductive contact 250 can comprise a pair of conducting rollers that are configured to accept substrate 205, for example in a groove.


In some embodiments, system 200 of FIGS. 2a may comprise additional modules between source 220 and resistance measurement module 210 and/or additional modules between resistance measurement module 210 and take-up spool 230. For example, additional materials may be introduced onto substrate 205 before or after proceeding through resistance measurement module. Such additional materials can include, without limitation, sizing agents, coatings, lubricants, surfactants, antistatic agents, other conducting elements, and the like, the exact nature of which may depend on the particular downstream application for substrate 205. In some embodiments, substrate 205 can also undergo physical alteration prior to or after passing through resistance measure module 210. For example, in some embodiments, where the CNSs comprises substantially CNTs, the CNTs may be oriented in an electric field. Depending on the form of substrate 205, other alterations may be performed prior to or after resistance measurement. For example, a tow material may be spread or fibers that exit the source in a spread form may be re-bundled.


In some embodiments, system 200 of FIGS. 2a and 2b may be equipped with more than one resistance measurement module 210. For example, system 200 may comprise two, three, or four resistance measurement modules 210. Such additional resistance measurement modules 210 may be disposed before or after any additional substrate 205 altering modules as described above.


In some embodiments, the CNS-laden substrate is fed continuously to the resistance measurement module from a CNS growth module, the CNS growth module itself being configured to continuously synthesize CNSs on a substrate precursor. Referring now to FIG. 3, there is shown an exemplary configuration of this embodiment. System 300 includes a CNS growth chamber 310 which receives a precursor substrate 305, which is typically catalyst-laden. CNS synthesis occurs in chamber 310, to provide CNS-laden substrate 205 at its distal end. Substrate 205 can be directly delivered to resistance measurement module 210 and taken up on take-up spool 230, as described herein. CNS growth chambers 310 and methods for synthesizing CNS-laden substrates 205 have been described in detail in related pending published U.S. Patent Application Nos. 2010/0276072, 2010/0279569, 2011/0168083, 2011/0168089, 2011/0171469, 2010-0272891, the relevant portions of which are incorporated herein by reference.


The following description is provided as guidance to the skilled artisan for producing carbon nanostructures (CNS)-laden substrates 205 in growth chamber 320. It will be recognized by those skilled in the art, that embodiments describing the preparation of carbon nanostructures on substrates disclosed below are merely exemplary. It is to be understood that the forgoing discussion uses the terms carbon nanostructure (CNS) and carbon nanotubes (CNT) interchangeably, as the exact nature of the CNS product is complex, but has as it primary structural element the carbon nanotube.


In some embodiments, the present invention utilizes fiber tow materials as pre-cursor substrate 305. The processes described herein allow for the continuous production of CNSs of uniform length and distribution along spoolable lengths of tow, roving, tapes, fabrics, meshes, perforated sheets, solid sheets, and ribbons. While various mats, woven and non-woven fabrics and the like can be functionalized by processes of the invention, it is also possible to generate such higher ordered structures from the parent roving, tow, yarn or the like after CNS functionalization of these parent materials. For example, a CNS-infused chopped strand mat can be generated from a CNS-infused fiber roving. As used herein the term “substrate” refers to any material which has fiber as its elementary structural component. The term encompasses, fibers, filaments, yarns, tows, tapes, woven and non-woven fabrics, plies, mats, and meshes.


Compositions having CNS-laden substrates are provided in which the CNSs may be substantially uniform in length. In the continuous process described herein, the residence time of the substrate in a CNS growth chamber can be modulated to control CNS growth and ultimately, CNS length. This provides a means to control specific properties of the CNSs grown. CNS length can also be controlled through modulation of the carbon feedstock and carrier gas flow rates, and growth temperature. Additional control of the CNS properties can be obtained by controlling, for example, the size of the catalyst used to prepare the CNSs. For example, 1 nm transition metal nanoparticle catalysts can be used to provide SWNTs in particular. Larger catalysts can be used to prepare predominantly MWNTs.


Additionally, the CNS growth processes employed are useful for providing CNS-laden substrate 205 with uniformly distributed CNSs on substrates while avoiding bundling and/or aggregation of the CNSs that can occur in processes in which pre-formed CNSs are suspended or dispersed in a solvent solution and applied by hand to the substrate. Such aggregated CNSs tend to adhere weakly to a substrate and the characteristic CNS properties are weakly expressed, if at all. In some embodiments, the maximum distribution density, expressed as percent coverage, that is, the surface area of fiber covered, can be as high as about 55%, assuming CNSs comprising CNTs with about 8 nm diameter with 5 walls. This coverage is calculated by considering the space inside the CNSs as being “fillable” space. Various distribution/density values can be achieved by varying catalyst dispersion on the surface as well as controlling gas composition, linespeed of the process, and reaction temperatures. Typically for a given set of parameters, a percent coverage within about 10% can be achieved across a substrate surface. Higher density and shorter CNSs are useful for improving mechanical properties, while longer CNSs with lower density are useful for improving thermal and electrical properties, although increased density is still favorable. A lower density can result when longer CNSs are grown. This can be the result of employing higher temperatures and more rapid growth causing lower catalyst particle yields.


The CNS-laden substrate 205 can include a substrate such as a metal filament, a fiber yarn, a fiber tow, a metal tape, a fiber-braid, a woven metal fabric, a non-woven fiber mat, a fiber ply, meshes ribbons, solid metal sheets, and perforated metal sheets. Metal filaments include high aspect ratio fibers having diameters ranging in size from between about 10 microns to about 12.5 mm or greater. Fiber tows are generally compactly associated bundles of filaments and are usually twisted together to give ropes.


Ropes include closely associated bundles of twisted filaments. Each filament diameter in a ropes is relatively uniform. Ropes have varying weights described by their ‘tex,’ expressed as weight in grams of 1000 linear meters, or denier, expressed as weight in pounds of 10,000 yards, with a typical tex range usually being between about 4000 tex to about 100000 tex.


Tows include loosely associated bundles of untwisted filaments. As in ropes, filament diameter in a tow is generally uniform. Tows also have varying weights and the tex range is usually between 2000 g and 12000 g. They are frequently characterized by the number of thousands of filaments in the tow, for example 10 wire rope, 50 wire rope, 100 wire rope, and the like.


Metal meshes are materials that can be assembled as weaves or can represent non-woven flattened ropes. Metal tapes can vary in width and are generally two-sided structures similar to ribbon. Processes of the present invention are compatible with CNS infusion on one or both sides of a tape. CNS-infused tapes can resemble a “carpet” or “forest” on a flat substrate surface. Again, processes of the invention can be performed in a continuous mode to functionalize spools of tape.


Fiber-braids represent rope-like structures of densely packed fibers. Such structures can be assembled from ropes, for example. Braided structures can include a hollow portion or a braided structure can be assembled about another core material.


In some embodiments, a number of primary substrate structures can be organized into fabric or sheet-like structures. These include, for example, woven metal meshes non-woven fiber mat and fiber ply, in addition to the tapes described above. Such higher ordered structures can be assembled from parent tows, ropes, filaments or the like, with CNSs already infused in the parent fiber. Alternatively such structures can serve as the substrate for the CNS infusion processes described herein.


Metals substrates can include any metal in zero-valent oxidation state including, for example, d-block metals, lanthanides, actinides, main group metals and the like. Any of these metals can also be used in non-zero-valent oxidation state, including, for example, metal oxides, metal nitrides, and the like. Exemplary d-block metals include, for example, scandium, titanium, vanadium, chromium, manganese, iron, cobalt, nickel, copper, zinc, yttrium, zirconium, niobium, molybdenum, technetium, ruthenium, rhodium, palladium, silver, cadmium, hafnium, tantalum, tungsten, rhenium, osmium, iridium, platinum, and gold. Exemplary main group metals include, for example, aluminum, gallium, indium, tin, thallium, lead, and bismuth. Exemplary metal salts useful in the invention include, for without limitation, oxides, carbides, nitrides, and acetates.


CNSs useful for infusion to substrates include single-walled CNTs, double-walled CNTs, multi-walled CNTs, and mixtures thereof. The exact CNSs to be used depends on the application of the CNS-infused fiber. CNSs can be used for thermal and/or electrical conductivity applications, or as insulators. In some embodiments, the infused CNSs are single-wall nanotubes. In some embodiments, the infused CNSs are multi-wall nanotubes. In some embodiments, the infused CNSs are a combination of single-wall and multi-wall nanotubes. There are some differences in the characteristic properties of single-wall and multi-wall nanotubes that, for some end uses of the fiber, dictate the synthesis of one or the other type of nanotube. For example, single-walled nanotubes can be semi-conducting or metallic, while multi-walled nanotubes are metallic.


CNSs lend their characteristic properties such as mechanical strength, low to moderate electrical resistivity, high thermal conductivity, and the like to the CNS-laden substrate. For example, in some embodiments, the electrical resistivity of a CNS-laden substrate is lower than the electrical resistivity of a parent substrate. The infused CNSs can also provide beneficial conductivity with lighter weights. Moreover, the use of shorter CNSs can be used to provide a greater tensile strength, while also improving electrical conductivity. More generally, the extent to which the resulting CNS-laden substrate expresses these characteristics can be a function of the extent and density of coverage of the fiber by the carbon nanotubes. Any amount of the fiber surface area, from 0-55% of the fiber can be covered assuming an 8 nm diameter, 5-walled MWNT (again this calculation counts the space inside the CNTs as fillable). This number is lower for smaller diameter CNSs and more for greater diameter CNSs. 55% surface area coverage is equivalent to about 15,000 CNSs/micron2. Further CNS properties can be imparted to the substrate in a manner dependent on CNS length, as described above. Infused CNSs can vary in length ranging from between about 1 micron to about 500 microns, including 1 micron, 2 microns, 3 microns, 4 micron, 5, microns, 6, microns, 7 microns, 8 microns, 9 microns, 10 microns, 15 microns, 20 microns, 25 microns, 30 microns, 35 microns, 40 microns, 45 microns, 50 microns, 60 microns, 70 microns, 80 microns, 90 microns, 100 microns, 150 microns, 200 microns, 250 microns, 300 microns, 350 microns, 400 microns, 450 microns, 500 microns, and all values in between. CNSs can also be less than about 1 micron in length, including about 0.5 microns, for example. CNSs can also be greater than 500 microns, including for example, 510 microns, 520 microns, 550 microns, 600 microns, 700 microns and all values in between.


CNSs may have a length from about 1 micron to about 10 microns. Such CNS lengths can be useful in application to increase shear strength. CNSs can also have a length from about 5-70 microns. Such CNS lengths can be useful in application to increase tensile strength if the CNSs are aligned in the fiber direction. CNSs can also have a length from about 10 microns to about 100 microns. Such CNS lengths can be useful to increase electrical/thermal and mechanical properties. The synthesis processes employed can also provide CNSs having a length from about 100 microns to about 500 microns, which can also be beneficial to increase electrical and thermal properties. One skilled in the art will recognize that the properties imparted are a continuum and that some tensile strength benefits can still be realized at longer CNS lengths. Likewise, shorter CNS lengths can still impart beneficial electrical properties as well. Control of CNS length is readily achieved through modulation of carbon feedstock and carrier gas flow rates coupled with varying process linespeeds and reaction temperatures, as described further below.


In some embodiments, spoolable lengths of CNS-laden substrates 205 can have various uniform regions with different lengths of CNSs. For example, it can be desirable to have a first section of CNS-laden substrate with uniformly shorter CNS lengths to enhance tensile and shear strength properties, and a second section of the same spoolable material with a uniform longer CNS length to enhance electrical or thermal properties.


Processes of the invention for CNS infusion to substrates allow control of the CNS lengths with uniformity and in a continuous process allowing spoolable substrates to be functionalized with CNSs at high rates. With material residence times between 5 to 300 seconds, linespeeds in a continuous process for a system that is 3 feet long can be in a range anywhere from about 0.5 ft/min to about 36 ft/min and greater. The speed selected depends on various parameters as explained further below.


In some embodiments, a material residence time in CNS growth chamber 320 of about 5 to about 300 seconds in a CNS growth chamber can produce CNSs having a length between about 1 micron to about 10 microns. In some embodiments, a material residence time of about 30 to about 180 seconds in a CNS growth chamber can produce CNSs having a length between about 10 microns to about 100 microns. In still other embodiments, a material residence time of about 180 to about 300 seconds can produce CNSs having a length between about 100 microns to about 500 microns. One skilled in the art will recognize that these numbers are approximations and that growth temperature and carrier and carbon feedstock flow rates can also impact CNS growth for a given material residence time. For example, increased temperatures typically increase the overall growth rate requiring less material residence time for a desired CNS length. Increased carbon feedstock flow rate ratio (inert to carbon feedstock) can also increase growth rates although this effect is less than changing the growth temperature.


CNS-laden substrate 205 may optionally include a barrier coating. Such barrier coatings may facilitate CNS synthesis on particularly challenging substrate materials. For example, materials that may not directly withstand CNS synthesis temperatures, or substrates on which CNS forming catalysts may be overly mobile on the surface and cause catalyst particles to undesirably agglomerate. Barrier coatings can include, for example, an alkoxysilane, such as methylsiloxane, an alumoxane, alumina nanoparticles, spin on glass and glass nanoparticles. As described below, the CNS-forming catalyst can be added to an uncured barrier coating material and then applied to the substrate together. In other embodiments the barrier coating material can be added to the substrate prior to deposition of the CNS-forming catalyst. The barrier coating material can be of a thickness sufficiently thin to allow exposure of the CNS-forming catalyst to the carbon feedstock for subsequent CVD growth. In some embodiments, the thickness is less than or about equal to the effective diameter of the CNS-forming catalyst. In some embodiments, the thickness is between about 10 nm and about 100 nm. In some embodiments, the thickness can be less than 10 nm, including 1 nm, 2 nm, 3 nm, 4 nm, 5 nm, 6 nm, 7 nm, 8 nm, 9 nm, and any value in between.


Without being bound by theory, the barrier coating can serve as an intermediate layer between the substrate and the CNSs and serves to mechanically infuse the CNSs to the substrate via a locked CNS-forming catalyst nanoparticle that serves as a site CNS growth. Such mechanical infusion provides a robust system in which the substrate serves as a platform for organizing the CNSs while still imparting properties of the CNSs to the substrate. Moreover, the benefit of including a barrier coating is the immediate protection it provides the substrate from chemical damage due to exposure to moisture, oxygen and any thermal effects of alloying, sintering, or the like when heating the substrate at the temperatures used to promote CNS growth.


In some embodiments the present invention provides a continuous process for CNS infusion that includes (a) disposing a carbon nanotube-forming catalyst on a surface of a substrate of spoolable dimensions; and (b) synthesizing carbon nanostructures directly on the substrate, thereby forming a CNS-laden substrate. For a 9 foot long system, the linespeed of the process can range from between about 1.5 ft/min to about 108 ft/min. The linespeeds achieved by the process described herein allow the formation of commercially relevant quantities of CNS-laden substrates with short production times. For example, at 36 ft/min linespeed, the quantities of CNS-infused fibers (over 5% infused CNSs on fiber by weight) can exceed over 250 pound or more of material produced per day in a system that is designed to simultaneously process 5 separate rovings (50 lb/roving). Systems can be made to produce more rovings at once or at faster speeds by repeating growth zones. Moreover, some steps in the fabrication of CNSs, as known in the art, have prohibitively slow rates preventing a continuous mode of operation. For example, in a typical process known in the art, a CNS-forming catalyst reduction step can take 1-12 hours to perform. The process described herein overcomes such rate limiting steps.


The linespeeds achievable using processes of the invention are particular remarkable when considering that some steps in the fabrication of CNSs, as known in the art, have otherwise prohibitively slow rates, thus preventing a continuous mode of operation. For example, in a typical process known in the art, a CNS-forming catalyst reduction step can take 1-12 hours to perform. CNS growth itself can also be time consuming, for example requiring tens of minutes for CNS growth, precluding the rapid linespeeds realized in the present invention. The process described herein overcomes such rate limiting steps.


The CNS-laden substrate-forming processes of the invention can avoid CNS entanglement that occurs when trying to apply suspensions of pre-formed carbon nanotubes to substrates. That is, because pre-formed CNSs are not fused to the substrate, the CNSs tend to bundle and entangle. The result is a poorly uniform distribution of CNSs that weakly adhere to the substrate. However, processes of the present invention can provide, if desired, a highly uniform entangled CNS mat on the surface of the substrate by reducing the growth density. The CNSs grown at low density are infused in the substrate first. In such embodiments, the fibers do not grow dense enough to induce vertical alignment, the result is entangled mats on the substrate surfaces. By contrast, manual application of pre-formed CNSs does not insure uniform distribution and density of a CNS mat on the substrate.


Producing CNS-laden substrate 205 may include at least the operations of functionalizing a substrate to be receptive to barrier coating; applying a barrier coating and a CNS-forming catalyst to the substrate; heating the substrate to a temperature that is sufficient for carbon nanotube synthesis; and Synthesizing CNSs by CVD-mediated growth on the catalyst-laden fiber.


To prepare a substrate for barrier coating, functionalizing the substrate is performed. In some embodiments, functionalizing the substrate can include a wet chemical oxidative etch to create reactive functional groups (metal oxo and/or hydroxyl groups) on the substrate surface. This can be particularly useful when using zero-valent metals to create a surface oxide layer. In other embodiments, functionalizing can include a plasma process, which may serve a dual role of creating functional groups as described above, and roughening the substrate surface to enhance the surface area and wetting properties of the substrate, including the deposition of the barrier coating. To infuse carbon nanotubes into a substrate, the carbon nanotubes are synthesized on a substrate which is conformally coated with a barrier coating. In one embodiment, this is accomplished by conformally coating the substrate with a barrier coating and then disposing CNS-forming catalyst on the barrier coating. In some embodiments, the barrier coating can be partially cured prior to catalyst deposition. This can provide a surface that is receptive to receiving the catalyst and allowing it to embed in the barrier coating, including allowing surface contact between the CNS forming catalyst and the substrate. In such embodiments, the barrier coating can be fully cured after embedding the catalyst. In some embodiments, the barrier coating is conformally coated over the substrate simultaneously with deposition of the CNS-form catalyst. Once the CNS-forming catalyst and barrier coating are in place, the barrier coating can be fully cured.


In some embodiments, the barrier coating can be fully cured prior to catalyst deposition. In such embodiments, a fully cured barrier-coated substrate can be treated with a plasma to prepare the surface to accept the catalyst. For example, a plasma treated substrate having a cured barrier coating can provide a roughened surface in which the CNS-forming catalyst can be deposited. The plasma process for “roughing” the surface of the barrier coating thus facilitates catalyst deposition. The roughness is typically on the scale of nanometers. In the plasma treatment process craters or depressions are formed that are nanometers deep and nanometers in diameter. Such surface modification can be achieved using a plasma of any one or more of a variety of different gases, including, without limitation, argon, helium, oxygen, nitrogen, and hydrogen. In order to treat substrate in a continuous manner, ‘atmospheric’ plasma which does not require vacuum must be utilized. Plasma is created by applying voltage across two electrodes, which in turn ionizes the gaseous species between the two electrodes. A plasma environment can be applied to a fiber substrate in a ‘downstream’ manner in which the ionized gases are flowed down toward the substrate. It is also possible to send the fiber substrate between the two electrodes and into the plasma environment to be treated.


In some embodiments, the precursor substrate 305 can be treated with a plasma environment prior to barrier coating application. For example, a plasma treated substrate can have a higher surface energy and therefore allow for better wet-out and coverage of the barrier coating. The plasma process can also add roughness to the fiber surface allowing for better mechanical bonding of the barrier coating in the same manner as mentioned above.


The CNS catalyst can be prepared as a liquid solution that contains CNS-forming catalyst that includes transition metal nanoparticles. The diameters of the synthesized nanotubes are related to the size of the metal particles as described above. In some embodiments, commercial dispersions of CNS-forming transition metal nanoparticle catalyst are available and are used without dilution, in other embodiments commercial dispersions of catalyst can be diluted. Whether or not to dilute such solutions can depend on the desired density and length of CNS to be grown as described above.


In some embodiments, systems disclosed herein providing CNS growth chamber 320 may be further equipped with a feedback module, the feedback module configured to receive an output from the resistance measurement module, the feedback module being optionally in electronic communication with the CNS growth module and being capable of signaling a change in at least one growth condition in the CNS growth module. Thus, as the resistance of CNS-laden substrate 205 is being monitored, any change in observed resistance can be a signal of altered CNS loading on the substrate as the two are correlated as described above and shown in FIG. 1.


In some such embodiments, the at least one growth condition is selected from temperature, a partial pressure of a carbon feedstock gas, a partial pressure of an inert gas, linespeed, and combinations thereof. That is, if the resistance measurement indicates a deficiency in CNS coverage, operating conditions can be altered to compensate. This may be especially beneficial in longer synthesis runs where the buildup of carbonaceous materials on various parts of the synthesis apparatus may impact CNS growth efficiency. In some embodiments, the resistance data, and hence the CNS loading may indicate a halt to operations. In some embodiments, the resistance data may indicate simply adjusting any combination of the aforementioned parameters.


In some embodiments, the feedback module is configured to provide information to an operator in the form of a data log. In some such embodiments, the data log may simply indicate pass/fail criteria for quality control. Pass/fail criteria may include a measurement of CNS loading on the CNS-laden substrate. In some embodiments, where the feedback module reports directly to an operator via, for example, a monitor interface, the operating can make the decision on any parameter to alter. In some embodiments, the feedback module may report via an electronic signal to the growth chamber and its controls. In some such embodiments, the signal may indicate a halt in operations. In other embodiments, the signal may indicate and increase or decrease in temperature, a partial pressure of a carbon feedstock gas, a partial pressure of an inert gas, linespeed, and combinations thereof.


The system of the invention shown in FIGS. 2b and 3 include resistance measurement module having two point conductive contact 250, however, in some embodiments systems of the present invention may comprise a four point conductive contact, wherein an outer pair of contacts is configured to deliver a current, and an inner pair is configured to measure a voltage. By Ohm's law V=IR, the resistance can be determined as R=V/I. In some embodiments the four point contact may comprise conductive rollers allowing the advancement the CNS-laden substrate to a take-up spool 220 or similar collection mandrel.


Referring now to FIGS. 4a-g there are shown numerous configurations for threading substrate 205 through a four point conductive contact array, with pairs a/b, c/d, and e/f being degenerate. In some embodiments, the exact choice of configuration may depend on, inter alia, the desired tension on the substrate, the surface area of contact with the conductive roller, the flexibility of the substrate, and the like. In this regard, further adjustments may be made by disposition of the conductive contacts 250. Referring to FIGS. 5a-c, in some embodiments, the four point conductive contacts are co-linear, for example as indicated in FIG. 5a. In other embodiments, the four point conductive contacts are staggered as shown in FIGS. 5b and 5c. Note that lateral disposition of the conductive contacts can be especially effective in modulating the tension on the substrate. In some embodiments, the distance between a first and second contact and a third and forth contact are larger, individually, than the distance between the second contact and the third contact.


Systems of the invention may include even further contacts beyond a four point contact. In some such embodiments, one or more further contacts may be disposed between the outer pair, the additional contacts being further configured to take multiple voltage measurements. Such redundant voltage measurements may enhance the accuracy of the resistance measurements and may also, therefore, impact the accuracy of assessing CNS loading on the CNS-laden substrate. In some embodiments, the plurality of measured voltages may be averaged to arrive at an average resistance. In some embodiments, measurement of CNS loading on a CNS-laden substrate may provide the CNS loading figure with an accuracy in a range from about 0.01 weight percent to about 1.0 weight percent, including any value in between. In some embodiments, the accuracy can be in a range from about 0.01 weight percent to about 0.1 weight percent, including any value in between. In some embodiments, the accuracy can be in a range from about 0.1 weight percent to about 0.5 weight percent, including any value in between. The exact degree of accuracy may depend on, inter alia, the degree of CNS loading. For example, with detection at the linear portion of a calibration curve an accuracy of about one percent may read as an equivalent 48 ohm change in resistance. Assuming, for example, an ability to measure plus or minus about one ohm, a low end of detection, accounting for observed noise, may be as low as about 0.01 weight percent.


In accordance with the system embodiments disclosed herein above, the present invention further provides a method comprising continuously synthesizing carbon nanostructures (CNSs) on a substrate in a CNS growth chamber to provide a CNS-laden substrate and continuously monitoring the resistance of the CNS-laden substrate exiting a distal end of the growth chamber, as exemplified in FIG. 3. Methods of the invention may include continuously monitoring the resistance of the CNS-laden substrate, such monitoring comprising applying an electric field to the CNS-laden substrate or applying a current to the substrate and measuring at least one voltage.


In some embodiments, methods of the invention may further comprise altering growth conditions in the CNS growth chamber in response to a threshold resistance measurement. In some such embodiments, this may include altering synthesis parameters, halting synthesis, any of which may be accomplished by an operator or, by a signal from the resistance measurement module to the CNS growth chamber.


To facilitate a better understanding of the present invention, the following examples of preferred embodiments are given. In no way should the following examples be read to limit, or to define, the scope of the invention.


EXAMPLE

This example demonstrates the detection capability of an in-line resistance monitoring system coupled with a continuous CNS-infused glass fiber growth system. In this case, detection of CNS as a function of weight percentage of the final fiber form is shown between 6-11% weight CNS on glass fiber.



FIG. 3 depicts system 300 for producing CNS-infused fiber and continuously monitoring fiber resistance. System 300 includes a CNS growth chamber 310 which receives a catalyst laden precursor substrate 305. CNS synthesis occurs in chamber 310, to provide CNS-laden substrate 205 at its distal end. Substrate 205 is delivered to resistance measurement module 210 and wound on take-up spool 230.


Catalyst laden precursor substrate 305 consists of a E-glass fiber which has been catalyzed in a previous process with an iron-based catalyst. In this example, the input catalyst laden precurson substrate 305 remains constant.


The catalyst laden precursor substrate 305 is drawn through CNS growth chamber 310 at a constant rate of 6.1 meters per minute by take up spool 230. The CNS growth system is maintained at a constant growth temperature of 700-800° C. Nitrogen gas is utilized as the inert carrier gas and a hydrocarbon gas such as ethylene, ethane, acetylene, or methane is used as the reactant gas. The ratio of hydrocarbon gas to nitrogen gas is held constant at 0.3 and the total flow rate is modulated between 1.5-3 liters per minute.


By modulating the total flow of the incoming gas and maintaining a constant growth temperature and substrate feed rate, CNS-laden substrate 205 has a controlled amount of CNS growth described by weight percentage of total final fiber weight of between 6 and 11 percent.


CNS-laden substrate 205 is then drawn through a 2-point resistance measurement module 210 which utilizes conductive rollers and bearings to transfer a current supplied by ohm meter 260. Ohm meter 260 is coupled to a data acquisition system (not shown) which continuously acquires resistance measurement data for future correlation to measured CNS weight percent data.


After the CNS laden substrate 205 is drawn through resistance measurement module 210, it is finally wound at take-up spool 230.


The data collected as a result of this example is shown in FIG. 6. The correlation curve demonstrates a linear relationship between CNS weight percentage on glass fiber between 6-11% where the increase is resistance is approximately 48 ohms per 1 weight percent CNS on fiber. Based on the noise measured during this example of about 1 ohm, a measurement resolution of approximately 0.02 weight percentage on CNS-infused fiber is expected.


It is to be understood that the above-described embodiments are merely illustrative of the present invention and that many variations of the above-described embodiments can be devised by those skilled in the art without departing from the scope of the invention. For example, in this Specification, numerous specific details are provided in order to provide a thorough description and understanding of the illustrative embodiments of the present invention. Those skilled in the art will recognize, however, that the invention can be practiced without one or more of those details, or with other processes, materials, components, etc.


Furthermore, in some instances, well-known structures, materials, or operations are not shown or described in detail to avoid obscuring aspects of the illustrative embodiments. It is understood that the various embodiments shown in the Figures are illustrative, and are not necessarily drawn to scale. Reference throughout the specification to “one embodiment” or “an embodiment” or “some embodiments” means that a particular feature, structure, material, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment(s) is included in at least one embodiment of the present invention, but not necessarily all embodiments. Consequently, the appearances of the phrase “in one embodiment,” “in an embodiment,” or “in some embodiments” in various places throughout the Specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment. Furthermore, the particular features, structures, materials, or characteristics can be combined in any suitable manner in one or more embodiments. It is therefore intended that such variations be included within the scope of the following claims and their equivalents.

Claims
  • 1. A quality control system for the manufacture of carbon nanostructure-laden fibers or fabrics comprising a resistance measurement module configured to receive a carbon nanostructure (CNS)-laden fiber or fabric in motion for continuously measuring resistance of the CNS-laden fiber or fabric as the CNS-laden fiber or fabric moves across the resistance measurement module, wherein: the resistance measurement module comprises at least a two point conductive contact with the CNT-laden fiber or fabric,the two point conductive contact is configured to modulate tension on the CNS-laden fiber or fabric over the two point conductive contact as the CNS-laden fiber or fabric moves across the resistance measurement module, andthe two point conductive contact is configured to be in contact with different positions of the CNS-laden fiber or fabric as the CNS-laden fiber or fabric moves across the resistance measurement module.
  • 2. The system of claim 1, wherein the resistance measurement module is configured to measure resistance via an electric field or inductive based measurement.
  • 3. The system of claim 1, wherein the CNS-laden fiber or fabric is configured to be fed continuously to the resistance measurement module from a CNS growth module, the CNS growth module configured to continuously synthesize CNSs on a substrate precursor.
  • 4. The system of claim 3, further equipped with a feedback module, the feedback module configured to receive an output from the resistance measurement module; the feedback module being optionally in electronic communication with the CNS growth module and being capable of signaling a change in at least one growth condition in the CNS growth module.
  • 5. The system of claim 4, wherein the at least one growth condition is selected from temperature, a partial pressure of a carbon feedstock gas, a partial pressure of an inert gas, linespeed, and combinations thereof.
  • 6. The system of claim 4, wherein the feedback module is configured to provide information to an operator in the form of a data log.
  • 7. The system of claim 6, wherein the data log indicates pass/fail criteria for quality control.
  • 8. The system of claim 7, wherein pass/fail criteria comprises a measurement of CNS loading on the CNS-laden fiber or fabric.
  • 9. The system of claim 1, the at least a two point conductive contact comprising four point conductive contacts, wherein an outer pair of contacts is configured to deliver a current, and an inner pair is configured to measure a voltage.
  • 10. The system of claim 9, wherein the four point contact comprises conductive rollers allowing the advancement the CNS-laden fiber or fabric to a collection mandrel.
  • 11. The system of claim 9, one or more further contacts disposed between the outer pair configured to take multiple voltage measurements.
  • 12. The system of claim 9, wherein the four point conductive contacts are co-linear.
  • 13. The system of claim 9, wherein the four point conductive contacts are staggered.
  • 14. The system of claim 9, wherein the distance between a first and second contact and a third and fourth contact are larger, individually, than the distance between the second contact and the third contact.
  • 15. A method comprising: continuously synthesizing carbon nanostructures (CNSs) on a fiber or fabric in a CNS growth chamber to provide a moving CNS-laden fiber or fabric;continuously receiving, over at least a two point conductive contact, the moving CNS-laden fiber or fabric exiting a distal end of the growth chamber, wherein the two point conductive contact modulates tension on the moving CNS-laden fiber or fabric over the two point conductive contact; andcontinuously monitoring resistance of the moving CNS-laden fiber or fabric; wherein the two point conductive contact is configured to be in contact with different positions of the CNS-laden fiber or fabric as the CNS-laden fiber or fabric is moving.
  • 16. The method of claim 15, wherein continuously monitoring the resistance of the moving CNS-laden fiber or fabric comprises applying an electric field to the moving CNS-laden fiber or fabric.
  • 17. The method of claim 15, wherein continuously monitoring the resistance of the moving CNS-laden fiber or fabric comprises applying a current to the moving CNS-laden fiber or fabric and measuring at least one voltage.
  • 18. The method of claim 15, further comprising altering growth conditions in the CNS growth chamber in response to a threshold resistance measurement.
  • 19. The system of claim 1, wherein the two point conductive contact is configured to move along the CNS-laden fiber or fabric.
  • 20. The method of claim 15, wherein the continuously monitoring comprises continuously measuring the resistance of the moving CNS-laden fiber or fabric across a length between the two point conductive contact.
US Referenced Citations (417)
Number Name Date Kind
2883306 Cotter Apr 1959 A
2883396 Cotter Apr 1959 A
3580731 Milewski et al. May 1971 A
4065592 McAllister Dec 1977 A
4104083 Hirano Aug 1978 A
4313084 Hosokawa et al. Jan 1982 A
4488203 Muranaka et al. Dec 1984 A
4515107 Fournier et al. May 1985 A
4530750 Alsenberg et al. Jul 1985 A
4581284 Eggert et al. Apr 1986 A
4707349 Hjersted Nov 1987 A
4920917 Nakatani et al. May 1990 A
5093155 Miyazaki et al. Mar 1992 A
5103067 Aldissi Apr 1992 A
5130194 Baker et al. Jul 1992 A
5156225 Murrin Oct 1992 A
5173367 Liimatta et al. Dec 1992 A
5175224 Horacek Dec 1992 A
5187021 Vydra et al. Feb 1993 A
5221605 Bard et al. Jun 1993 A
5238808 Bard et al. Aug 1993 A
5246794 Blomgren et al. Sep 1993 A
5310687 Bard et al. May 1994 A
5449574 Higley Sep 1995 A
5470408 Nielson et al. Nov 1995 A
5514217 Niino et al. May 1996 A
5547525 Bennett et al. Aug 1996 A
5571749 Matsuda et al. Nov 1996 A
5581438 Halliop Dec 1996 A
5583318 Powell Dec 1996 A
5639984 Nielson Jun 1997 A
5707758 Iwatsu et al. Jan 1998 A
5714089 Bard et al. Feb 1998 A
5731147 Bard et al. Mar 1998 A
5891306 Chase et al. Apr 1999 A
5908585 Shibuta Jun 1999 A
5949018 Esker Sep 1999 A
5968274 Fujioka et al. Oct 1999 A
5997832 Lieber et al. Dec 1999 A
6139956 Endoh et al. Oct 2000 A
6140138 Bard et al. Oct 2000 A
6146783 Brohm et al. Nov 2000 A
6180281 Schneider et al. Jan 2001 B1
6184280 Shibuta Feb 2001 B1
6194685 Rutherford Feb 2001 B1
6221154 Lee et al. Apr 2001 B1
6225565 Prysner May 2001 B1
6232706 Dai et al. May 2001 B1
6233135 Farahmandi et al. May 2001 B1
6251520 Blizzard et al. Jun 2001 B1
6265466 Glatkowski et al. Jul 2001 B1
6331209 Jang et al. Dec 2001 B1
6333016 Resasco et al. Dec 2001 B1
6361861 Gao Mar 2002 B2
6413487 Resasco et al. Jul 2002 B1
6420293 Chang et al. Jul 2002 B1
6430031 Dispennette et al. Aug 2002 B1
6454816 Lee et al. Sep 2002 B1
6455021 Saito Sep 2002 B1
6465057 Nakahigashi et al. Oct 2002 B1
6479028 Kaner et al. Nov 2002 B1
6479030 Firsich Nov 2002 B1
6491789 Niu Dec 2002 B2
6495258 Chen et al. Dec 2002 B1
6528572 Patel et al. Mar 2003 B1
6564744 Nakahigashi et al. May 2003 B2
6585152 Farahmandi et al. Jul 2003 B2
6602742 Maletin et al. Aug 2003 B2
6639786 Noguchi et al. Oct 2003 B2
6650531 Ikeda et al. Nov 2003 B2
6653619 Chin et al. Nov 2003 B2
6673392 Lee et al. Jan 2004 B2
6686537 Gareis et al. Feb 2004 B1
6692717 Smalley et al. Feb 2004 B1
6765949 Chang Jul 2004 B2
6773466 Hiratsuka et al. Aug 2004 B1
6790425 Smalley et al. Sep 2004 B1
6818821 Fujieda et al. Nov 2004 B2
6831826 Iwaida et al. Dec 2004 B2
6837928 Zhang et al. Jan 2005 B1
6852410 Veedu et al. Feb 2005 B2
6863942 Ren et al. Mar 2005 B2
6887365 Naughton May 2005 B2
6887451 Dodelet et al. May 2005 B2
6900264 Kumar et al. May 2005 B2
6900580 Dai et al. May 2005 B2
6908572 Derbyshire et al. Jun 2005 B1
6913075 Knowles et al. Jul 2005 B1
6934600 Jang et al. Aug 2005 B2
6936653 McElrath et al. Aug 2005 B2
6949237 Smalley et al. Sep 2005 B2
6955800 Resasco et al. Oct 2005 B2
6962892 Resasco et al. Nov 2005 B2
6967013 Someya et al. Nov 2005 B2
6979709 Smalley et al. Dec 2005 B2
6986853 Glatkowski et al. Jan 2006 B2
6986877 Takikawa et al. Jan 2006 B2
6994907 Resasco et al. Feb 2006 B2
7011760 Wang et al. Mar 2006 B2
7018600 Yanagisawa et al. Mar 2006 B2
7022776 Bastiaens et al. Apr 2006 B2
7045108 Jiang et al. May 2006 B2
7056452 Niu et al. Jun 2006 B2
7060326 Hiel et al. Jun 2006 B2
7061749 Liu et al. Jun 2006 B2
7074294 Dubrow Jul 2006 B2
7085125 Sung Aug 2006 B2
7094386 Resasco et al. Aug 2006 B2
7105596 Smalley et al. Sep 2006 B2
7108841 Smalley et al. Sep 2006 B2
7118693 Glatkowski et al. Oct 2006 B2
7125502 Smalley et al. Oct 2006 B2
7125534 Smalley et al. Oct 2006 B1
7132621 Kumar et al. Nov 2006 B2
7144563 Rao et al. Dec 2006 B2
7147966 Ren et al. Dec 2006 B2
7148619 Ken et al. Dec 2006 B2
7151129 Ishikawa et al. Dec 2006 B2
7153452 Ogale et al. Dec 2006 B2
7157068 Li et al. Jan 2007 B2
7160532 Liu et al. Jan 2007 B2
7189959 Morison et al. Mar 2007 B1
7211320 Cooper et al. May 2007 B1
7226643 Juang et al. Jun 2007 B2
7235159 Gu et al. Jun 2007 B2
7253442 Huang et al. Aug 2007 B2
7261779 Gardner Aug 2007 B2
7265174 Carroll et al. Sep 2007 B2
7265175 Winey et al. Sep 2007 B2
7278324 Smits et al. Oct 2007 B2
7282260 LeGrande Oct 2007 B2
7289312 Duff, Jr. Oct 2007 B2
7294302 Kolde et al. Nov 2007 B2
7312608 Georgeson et al. Dec 2007 B2
7329698 Noguchi et al. Feb 2008 B2
7338684 Curliss et al. Mar 2008 B1
7340134 Hudson, II et al. Mar 2008 B1
7352559 Sung Apr 2008 B2
7354877 Rosenberger et al. Apr 2008 B2
7354881 Resasco et al. Apr 2008 B2
7354988 Charati et al. Apr 2008 B2
7372880 Jablonski et al. May 2008 B2
7384663 Olry et al. Jun 2008 B2
7399794 Harmon et al. Jul 2008 B2
7407640 Barrera et al. Aug 2008 B2
7407901 Bystricky et al. Aug 2008 B2
7410628 Bening et al. Aug 2008 B2
7419601 Cooper et al. Sep 2008 B2
7431965 Grigorian et al. Oct 2008 B2
7435476 Viswanathan et al. Oct 2008 B2
7442284 Ren et al. Oct 2008 B2
7445817 Kumar et al. Nov 2008 B2
7448441 Hendricks et al. Nov 2008 B2
7448931 Liu et al. Nov 2008 B2
7449631 Lee et al. Nov 2008 B2
7459627 Lee et al. Dec 2008 B2
7465605 Raravikar et al. Dec 2008 B2
7466539 Dementiev et al. Dec 2008 B2
7473466 Muradov Jan 2009 B1
7479052 Kim et al. Jan 2009 B2
7488455 Dai et al. Feb 2009 B2
7504078 Jacques et al. Mar 2009 B1
7510695 Smalley et al. Mar 2009 B2
7610695 Smalley et al. Mar 2009 B2
7531267 Kim May 2009 B2
7532454 Plee et al. May 2009 B2
7534486 Boerstoel et al. May 2009 B2
7553341 Pan et al. Jun 2009 B2
7563411 Jiang et al. Jul 2009 B2
7563428 Resasco et al. Jul 2009 B2
7569425 Huang et al. Aug 2009 B2
7579112 Chiang et al. Aug 2009 B2
7588700 Kwon et al. Sep 2009 B2
7592248 Ventzek et al. Sep 2009 B2
7597869 Hsiao Oct 2009 B2
7608798 Kumar et al. Oct 2009 B2
7611579 Lashmore et al. Nov 2009 B2
7612985 Dementiev et al. Nov 2009 B2
7615204 Ajayan et al. Nov 2009 B2
7615205 Jiang et al. Nov 2009 B2
7632550 Mizuno et al. Dec 2009 B2
7632569 Smalley et al. Dec 2009 B2
7700943 Raravikar et al. Apr 2010 B2
7709087 Majidi et al. May 2010 B2
7718220 D'Silva et al. May 2010 B2
7771798 Grosse et al. Aug 2010 B1
7776777 Kim et al. Aug 2010 B2
7793653 Kuckelkorn et al. Sep 2010 B2
7811632 Eres Oct 2010 B2
7815820 Tan et al. Oct 2010 B2
7816709 Balzano et al. Oct 2010 B2
7820329 Boulton et al. Oct 2010 B2
7862795 Zhang et al. Jan 2011 B2
7871591 Harutyunyan et al. Jan 2011 B2
7880376 Takai et al. Feb 2011 B2
7927701 Curliss et al. Apr 2011 B2
8373971 Young Feb 2013 B2
20020035170 Glatkowski et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020048143 Lee et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020085968 Smalley et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020090330 Smalley et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020098135 Smalley et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020136683 Smalley et al. Sep 2002 A1
20030042147 Talin et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030044678 ESq. Mar 2003 A1
20030055153 Luippold et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030102585 Poulin et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030111333 Montgomery et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030143453 Ren et al. Jul 2003 A1
20040007955 Yaniv et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040018375 Banno et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040020681 Hjortstam et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040026234 Vanden Brande et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040029019 Clarke et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040055631 Szymocha et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040071870 Knowles et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040082247 Desai et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040096389 Lobovsky et al. May 2004 A1
20040105807 Fan et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040111141 Brabec et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040166417 Nishio et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040184981 Liu et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040197546 Rinzler et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040210289 Wang et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040241532 Kim Dec 2004 A1
20040245088 Gardner Dec 2004 A1
20040253167 Silva et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050090176 Dean et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050100501 Veedu et al. May 2005 A1
20050112052 Gu et al. May 2005 A1
20050113876 Weiner et al. May 2005 A1
20050119371 Drzal et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050150620 Hamada et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050170177 Crawford et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050172370 Haq et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050176329 Olry et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050188727 Greywall Sep 2005 A1
20050214648 Boulton et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050231893 Harvey Oct 2005 A1
20050238810 Scaringe et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050260412 Gardner Nov 2005 A1
20050263456 Cooper et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050287064 Mayne et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060052509 Saitoh Mar 2006 A1
20060054866 Ait-Haddou et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060063065 Clarke et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060110599 Honma et al. May 2006 A1
20060121275 Poulin et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060126268 Sung Jun 2006 A1
20060159916 Dubrow et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060177602 Dijon et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060198956 Eres Sep 2006 A1
20060233692 Scaringe et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060241236 Kuznetsov et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060249203 Li et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060253942 Barrera et al. Nov 2006 A1
20070020167 Han et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070036709 Lashmore et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070048521 Istvan Mar 2007 A1
20070054105 Hsiao Mar 2007 A1
20070062799 Lee Mar 2007 A1
20070070579 Sung Mar 2007 A1
20070076349 Dementiev et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070092431 Resasco et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070110977 Al-Haik et al. May 2007 A1
20070128960 Ghasemi Nejhad et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070134555 Ren et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070135588 Diakoumakos et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070166603 Nakanishi et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070189953 Bai et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070237990 Kim Oct 2007 A1
20070241962 Shinoda et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070259128 Parsapour Nov 2007 A1
20070293086 Liu et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080010796 Pan et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080014431 Lashmore et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080020193 Jang et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080048364 Armeniades et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080049380 Miyahara et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080053922 Honsinger, Jr. et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080057265 Liang et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080063585 Smalley et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080075954 Wardle et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080102371 Mitchell et al. May 2008 A1
20080117562 Maruyama et al. May 2008 A1
20080118753 Poulin et al. May 2008 A1
20080137890 Petersen et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080146440 Westin et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080160286 Asrar et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080170982 Zhang et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080173111 Thostenson et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080182108 Curliss et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080187482 Chen et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080187648 Hart et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080195187 Li et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080212261 Ajayan et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080247938 Tsai et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080248192 Long et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080248362 Sayre et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080251971 Kim et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080254675 Lee et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080273290 Dementiev et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080279753 Harutyunyan Nov 2008 A1
20080286564 Tsotsis Nov 2008 A1
20080296558 Choi et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080297980 Bourcier et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080299308 Luo et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090017301 Moireau Jan 2009 A1
20090020734 Jang et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090029127 Watanabe et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090047453 Folaron et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090047502 Folaron et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090053512 Pyun et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090059474 Zhamu et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090068387 Panzer et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090068461 Reneker et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090072222 Radisic et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090081383 Alberding et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090081441 Shah et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090087743 Kim et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090092832 Moireau Apr 2009 A1
20090095051 Suzuki et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090098453 Liu et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090099016 Carruthers et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090117269 Hansen et al. May 2009 A1
20090121219 Song et al. May 2009 A1
20090126783 Lin et al. May 2009 A1
20090136707 Ueno May 2009 A1
20090140098 Lengsfeld et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090176100 Higashi et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090176112 Kruckenberg et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090181309 Kwon et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090185327 Seymour Jul 2009 A1
20090186214 Lafdi et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090186276 Zhamu et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090191352 DuFaux et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090192241 Raravikar et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090194313 Jiang et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090208743 Pettit Aug 2009 A1
20090212430 Wyland Aug 2009 A1
20090214800 Saito Aug 2009 A1
20090214944 Rojeski Aug 2009 A1
20090220409 Curliss et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090226673 Friedersdorf et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090244810 Reynolds Oct 2009 A1
20090255706 Jiang et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090258164 Nakai et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090262484 Miyagi Oct 2009 A1
20090272946 Lu Nov 2009 A1
20090282671 Tao et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090286079 Barker et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090294022 Hayes et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090294753 Hauge et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090305135 Shi et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090311166 Hart et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090314510 Kukowski et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090325076 Matsui et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100000520 Vachon Jan 2010 A1
20100000754 Mann et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100000770 Gupta et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100035124 Thompson et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100059243 Chang Mar 2010 A1
20100074834 Kim Mar 2010 A1
20100087042 Kim et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100098931 Daniel et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100099319 Lashmore et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100159240 Shah et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100173228 Wallace et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100178531 Amaratunga et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100178825 Shah et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100188833 Liang et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100192851 Shah et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100196695 Garcia et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100196697 D'Silva et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100197848 Verghese et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100203362 Lam et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100206504 Akiyama et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100210159 Zhu Aug 2010 A1
20100221424 Malecki et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100224129 Malecki et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100227134 Shah et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100227155 Bao et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100254885 Menchhofer et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100258111 Shah et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100270069 Shar et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100270513 Haylock et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100271253 Shah et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100272891 Malecki et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100276072 Shah et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100279569 Shah et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100286395 Newkome et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100311866 Huang et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100330421 Cui et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110024409 Shah et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110024694 Shah et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110036829 Fugetsu et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110089958 Malecki et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110104571 Zhamu et al. May 2011 A1
20110123735 Shah et al. May 2011 A1
20110124253 Shah et al. May 2011 A1
20110124483 Shah et al. May 2011 A1
20110143087 Alberding et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110159365 Loveness et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110159381 Doe et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110163274 Plee et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110171469 Shah et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110174519 Shah et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110186775 Shah et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110216476 Fleischer et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110235240 Lu et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110242731 Fleischer et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110281068 David et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110287318 Loveness et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110297892 Shah et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110304964 Fleischer et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120000691 Shah et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120052363 Fleischer et al. Mar 2012 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (57)
Number Date Country
1363123 Aug 2002 CN
1838999 Sep 2006 CN
1970612 May 2007 CN
101189930 May 2008 CN
101365740 Feb 2009 CN
101654555 Feb 2010 CN
101698975 Apr 2010 CN
01900DE2008 Mar 2010 IN
61-157495 Jul 1986 JP
H-05-269874 Oct 1993 JP
H 07-134911 May 1995 JP
H 11-134949 May 1999 JP
2001-517583 Oct 2001 JP
2002-515847 May 2002 JP
2003-239171 Aug 2003 JP
2004-039668 Feb 2004 JP
2004247064 Sep 2004 JP
2005-353493 Dec 2005 JP
2005-538026 Dec 2005 JP
2007-070593 Mar 2007 JP
2007-515364 Jun 2007 JP
2007-194354 Aug 2007 JP
2007-220841 Aug 2007 JP
2007-246317 Sep 2007 JP
2008-010329 Jan 2008 JP
2008-270807 Nov 2008 JP
2008-296338 Dec 2008 JP
2009-173476 Aug 2009 JP
2009-190948 Aug 2009 JP
2009-533831 Sep 2009 JP
2009-252745 Oct 2009 JP
2009-535530 Oct 2009 JP
2009-537339 Oct 2009 JP
100829001 May 2008 KR
200833861 Aug 2008 TW
WO 03082733 Oct 2003 WO
WO 2006048531 May 2006 WO
WO-2006080702 Aug 2006 WO
WO 2006115486 Nov 2006 WO
WO 2007015710 Feb 2007 WO
WO 2007061854 May 2007 WO
WO 2007089118 Aug 2007 WO
WO 2007149109 Dec 2007 WO
WO 2008012196 Jan 2008 WO
WO-2008035730 Mar 2008 WO
WO 2008041183 Apr 2008 WO
WO-2008054409 May 2008 WO
WO 2008054541 May 2008 WO
WO 2008085634 Jul 2008 WO
WO-2008085550 Jul 2008 WO
WO 2008115168 Sep 2008 WO
WO 2008115640 Sep 2008 WO
WO-2008133299 Nov 2008 WO
WO 2008145787 Dec 2008 WO
WO 2009004346 Jan 2009 WO
WO 2009110885 Sep 2009 WO
WO-2009125421 Oct 2009 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (69)
Entry
Parikh et al. Flexible vapour sensors using single walled carbon nanotubes, Sensors and Actuators B, 113, 2006 pp. 55-63.
Rebouillat et al. Measuring the Electrical Conductivity of Single Fibres, Int. J. Electrochem. Sci., 6 (2011) 5731-5740.
Park et al. Strain-dependent electrical resistance of multi-walled carbon nanotube/polymer composite films, Nanotechnology 19 (2008) 055705, pp. 1-7.
Garcia, et al., “Fabrication and multifunctional properties of a hybrid laminate with aligned carbon nanotubes grown In Situ”, Composites Science and Technology, Jul. 1, 2008, pp. 2034-2041, vol. 68, No. 9.
Ago, et al., “Colloidal Solution of Metal Nanoparticles as a Catalyst for Carbon Nanotube Growth”, Proceedings Materials Research Society, Fall 2000, pp. A13.18.1-A13.18.5, vol. 633, Materials Research Society.
Andrews, et al., “Nanotube Composite Carbon Fibers,” Applied Physics Letters, Aug. 1999, vol. 75, No. 9, pp. 1329-1331.
Arepalli, et al., “Carbon-Nanotube-Based Electrochemical Double-Layer Capacitor Technologies for Spaceflight Applications,” JOM, Dec. 2005, pp. 26-31.
Bradford, et al., “Electrical Conductivity Study of Carbon nanotube Yarns, 3-D Hybrid Braids and their Composites”, Jouranl of Composite Materials, pp. 1533-1545, vol. 42, No. 15, SAGE Productions, Los Angeles, London, New Delhi and Singapore.
Bubert, et al., “Basic analytical investigation of plasma-chemically modified carbon fibers”, Spectrochimica Acta Part B., 2002, pp. 1601-1610, vol. 57, Elsevier Science B.V.
Chae, et al., “A comparison of reinforcement efficiency of various types of carbon nanotubes in polyacrylonitrile fiber”, Polymer, Nov. 21, 2005, pp. 10925-10935, vol. 46, No. 24, Elsevier Ltd.
Che, et al., “Chemical Vapor Deposition Based Synthesis of Carbon Nanotubes and Nanofibers Using a Template Method”, Chem. Mater., 1998, pp. 260-267, vol. 10, American Chemical Society.
Chen, et al., “Basalt fiber-epoxy laminates with functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotubes”, Composites, Part A, 2009, pp. 1082-1089, vol. 40, Elsevier Ltd.
Chen, et al., “Pulsed electrodeposition of Pt nanoclusters on carbon nanotubes modified carbon materials using diffusion restricting viscous electroyles”, Electrochemistry Communications, Jun. 2007, pp. 1348-1354, vol. 9, Elsevier B.V.
Ci, et al., “Direct Growth of Carbon Nanotubes on the Surface of Ceramic Fibers”, Carbon, 2005, pp. 883-886, vol. 43, No. 4, Elsevier Ltd.
Cui, et al., “Carbon—Silicon Core-Shell Nanowires As High Capacity Electrode For Lithium Ion Batteries,” American Chemical Society, vol. xx, No. x.
Franz, et al., “Carbon Single-Wall Nanotube Growth in a Volumetrically Confined Arc Discharge System”, U.S. Departement of Energy Journal of Undergraduate Research, pp. 66-69, publication date unknown.
Garcia, et al., “Aligned Carbon Nanotube Reinforcement of Advanced Composite Ply Interfaces,” 49th AIAA/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Apr. 7-10, 2008, Schaumburg, IL, MIT, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc.
Hsieh, et al., “Synthesis of Carbon Nanotubes on Carbon Fabric for Use as electrochemical Capacitor,” Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, (2009), pp. 155-159, vol. 122.
Hsu, et al., “Optical Absorption and Thermal Transport of Individual Suspended Carbon Nanotube Bundles”, Nano Lett., 2009, pp. 590-594, vol. 9, No. 2, American Chemical Society, Publication Date (Web): Jan. 13, 2009.
Jiang, et al., “Carbon nanotube-coated solid-phase microextraction metal fiber based on sol-gel technique”, Journal of Chromatography A., May 29, 2009, pp. 4641-4647, vol. 1216, Elsevier B.V.
Jiang, et al., “Plasma-Enhanced Deposition of Silver Nanoparticles onto Polymer and Metal Surfaces for the Generation of Antimicrobial Characteristics”, Journal of Applied—Polymer Science, 2004, pp. 1411-1422, vol. 93, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Jo, et al., “Field Emission of Carbon Nanotubes Grown on Carbon Cloth,” Applied Physics Letters, Aug. 2, 2004, pp. 810-812, vol. 85, No. 5.
Jung, et al., “Fabrication of radar absorbing structure (RAS) using GFR-nano composite and spring-back compensation of hybrid composite RAS shells”, Composite Structures, 2006, pp. 571-576, vol. 75, Elsevier Ltd.
Kim, et al., “Processing, characterization, and modeling of carbon nanotube-reinforced multiscale composites,” Composites Science and Technology, 2009, pp. 335,342, vol. 69, Elsevier Ltd.
Kind, et al., “Patterned Films of Nanotubes Using Microcontact Printing of Catalysts”, Adv. Mater., 1999, pp. 1285-1289, vol. 11, No. 15, Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH, D-69469 Weinheim.
Kramer, et al., Constrained Iron Catalysts for Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube Growth?, Langmuir 2005, 21, 8466-8470 [http://pubs.acs.org/dol/abs/10.1021/la0506729].
Laachachi, et al., “A chemical method to graft carbon nanotubes onto a carbon fiber”, Materials Letters, 2008, pp. 394-397, vol. 62, Elsevier B.V.
Lee, “Syntheses and properties of fluorinated carbon materials”, Journal of Fluorine Chemistry, 2007, pp. 392-403, vol. 128, Elsevier B.V.
Lee, et al., “Fabrication and design of multi-layered radar absorbing structures of MWNT-filled glass/epoxy plain-weave composites”, Composite Structures, 2006, pp. 397-405, vol. 76, Elsevier Ltd.
Li, et al., “A Miniature glucose/O2 biofuel cell with single-walled carbon nanotubes-modified carbon fiber microelectrodes as the substrate”, Electrochemistry Communications, Jun. 2008, pp. 851-854, vol. 10, Elsevier B.V.
Li, et al., “Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) Shielding of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube Epoxy Composites”, Nano Lett., 2006, pp. 1141-1145, vol. 6, No. 6, American Chemical Society.
Makris, et al., “Carbon Nanotubes Growth and Anchorage to Carbon Fibres”, Carbon Nanotubes, 2006, pp. 57-58, vol. 222, Springer, the Netherlands.
Meyyappan, et al., “Carbon nanotube growth by PECVD: a review”, Plasma Sources Sci. Technol., 2003, pp. 205-216, vol. 12, IOP Publishing Ltd, UK.
Mylvaganam, “Fabrication and Application of Polymer Composites Comprising Carbon Nanotubes”, Recent Pat Nanotechnol., 2007, pp. 59-65, vol. 1, Bentham Science Publishers, Ltd.
Panhuis, et al., “Carbon Nanotube Mediated Reduction in Optical Activity in Polyaniline Composite Materials”, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2008, pp. 1441-1445, vol. 112, American Chemical Society.
Parrish, “Carbon Nanotubes and Carbon Layer Nanostructured Composites Grown in Improved Process,” Capella University, Before It's News, Jul. 9, 2010.
Pisco, et al., “Hollow fibers integrated with single walled carbon nanotubes: Bandgap modification and chemical sensing capability”, Sensors and Actuators B, 2008, pp. 163-170, vol. 129, Elsevier B.V.
Ra{hacek over (c)}kauskas “Carbon nanotube growth and use in energy sector”, Energetika, 2006, pp. 43-46, vol. 2.
Satishkumar, et al., “Bundles of aligned carbon nanotubes obtained by the pyrolysis of ferrocene-hydrocarbon mixtures: role of the metal nanoparticles produced in situ”, Chemical Physics Letters, 1999, pp. 158-162, vol. 307, Elsevier Science B.V.
Suh, et al., “Highly ordered two-dimensional carbon nanotube arrays”, Applied Physics Letters, Oct. 4, 2002, pp. 2047-2049, vol. 75, No. 14, American Institute of Physics.
Thostenson et al., “Carbon Nanotube Networks: Sensing of distributed Strain and Damage for Life Prediction and Self Healing,” Advanced Materials, Oct. 2, 1006, vol. 18, Iss. 21, pp. 2837-2841.
Wang, et al., “Penetration depth of atmospheric pressure plasma surface modification into multiple layers of polyester fabrics”, Surface and Coatings Technology, 2007, pp. 77-83, vol. 202, Elsevier B.V.
Wang, et al., “Processing and property investigation of single-walled carbon nanotube (SWNT) buckypaper/epoxy resin matrix nanocomposites”, Composites: Part A, 2004, pp. 1225-1232, vol. 35, Elsevier Ltd.
Wichmann, et al., “Glass-fibre-reinforced composites with enhanced mechanical and electrical properties—Benefits and limitations of a nanoparticle modified matrix”, Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2006, pp. 2346-2359, vol. 73, Elisevier Ltd.
Xu, et al., “Bone-Shaped Nanomaterials for Nanocomposite Applications”, Nano Lett., 2003, pp. 1135-1139, vol. 3, No. 8, American Chemical Society.
Yabe, et al., Synthesis of well-aligned carbon nanotubes by radio frequency plasma enhanced CVD method, Diamond and Related Materials, 2004, pp. 1292-1295, vol. 13, Elsevier B.V.
Yanagishita, et al., “Carbon Nanotubes with a Triangular Cross-section, Fabricated Using Anodic Porous Alumina as the Temple”, Adv. Mater., 204, pp. 429-432, vol. 16, No. 5, Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.
Yang, et al., “Electrical Conductivity and Electromagnetic Interference Shielding of Multi-walled Carbon Nanotube Filled Polymer Composites” Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 2005, pp. HH5.3.1-HH.5.3.5, vol. 858E, Materials Research Society.
Yeh, et al., “Mechanical properties of phenolic-based nanocomposites reinforced by multi-walled carbon nanotubes and carbon fibers”, Composites: Part A, 2008, pp. 677-684, vol. 39, No. 4.
Zhang et al., “Integration and characterization of aligned carbon nanotubes on metal/silicon substrates and effects of water”, Applied Surface Science 255 (2009) 5003-5008, entire document.
Zhang, et al., “In situ growth of carbon nanotubes on inorganic fibers with different surface properties,” Materials Chemistry and Physics, 2008, pp. 317-321, vol. 107, Science Direct.
Zhao et al., “The Use of Carbon Nanotubes to Sense Matrix Stresses Around a Single Glass Fiber,” Composites Science and Technology, Nov. 2001, vol. 61, No. 14, pp. 2139-2143.
Zhao, et al., “Carbon Nanosheets as the Electrode Material in Supercapacitors,” Journal of Power Sources 194 (2009 pp. 1208-1212.
Zhao, et al., “Growth of carbon nanotubes on the surface of carbon fibers”, Carbon, 2007, pp. 380-383, vol. 46, No. 2, Elsevier Ltd.
Zhao, et al., “The growth of multi-walled carbon nanotubes with different morphologies on carbon fibers”, Carbon, 2005, pp. 651-673, vol. 43, Elsevier Ltd.
Zhu, et al., “Carbon nanotube growth on carbon fibers”, Diamond and Related Materials, 2003, pp. 1825-1825, vol. 12, Elsevier B.V.
Zhu, et al., “Synthesis of single-walled carbon nanotubes by the vertical floating catalyst method,” Chinese Science Bulletin, 2002, pp. 159-162, vol. 47, No. 2.
Hou et al., “A resistance-based damage location sensor for carbon-fibre composites”, Smart Materials and Structures, Nov. 4, 2002, vol. 11, pp. 966-969.
Thostenson et al., “Real-time in situ sensing of damage evolution in advanced fiber composites using carbon nanotube networks”, Nanotechnology, Apr. 23, 2008, vol. 19.
Buehler GmbH, Safety Data Sheet 1907/2006/EC (GB) Buehler EpoThin Hardener, revised Apr. 21, 2008, 5 pages.
Buehler GmbH, Safety Data Sheet 1907/2006/EC (GB) Buehler EpoThin Resin, revised Apr. 21, 2008, 5 pages.
CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 95th Edition, 2014-2015, Physical Constants of Inorganic Compounds, p. 4-45.
The University of Edinburgh School of GeoSciences, Sample Preparation Procedures, revised Aug. 23, 2008, 6 pages.
Fiedler et al, “Can Carbon Nanotubes Be Used to Sense Damage in Composites?”, Annales de Chimie—Science des Materiaux, 2004, vol. 29, No. 6, pp. 81-94.
vanSchalkwijk, et al., “Advances in Lithium-Ion Batteries,” Kluwer Academic Plenum Publishers, 2002, p. 499.
Ma, et al., “Electrochemical properties of manganese oxide coated onto carbon nanotubes for energy-storage applications,” Dec. 2007, Journal of Power Sources, pp. 483-489, vol. 178, No. 1.
Lee, et al., “Fabrication of polypyrrole (PPy)/carbon nanotube (CNT) composite electrode on ceramic fabric for supercapacitor applications,” Jun. 2011, Electrochimica ACTA, pp. 7460-7466, vol. 56, No. 22.
Stoller, et al., “Best practice methods for determining an electrode material's performance for ultracapacitors,” Jan. 2010, Energy & Environmental Science, pp. 1294-1301, vol. 3, No. 9.
CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 95th Edition, 2014-2015, Physical Constants of Inorganic Compounds, p. 4-88.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20130236631 A1 Sep 2013 US