The present invention relates to systems and methods used in the manufacture of carbon nanostructure-laden materials, and more specifically to measuring the resistance of carbon nanostructure-laden materials during their manufacture.
High-performance materials incorporating carbon nanostructures (CNSs) are becoming increasingly important industrially. CNSs may impart desirable properties to composites, for example, such as enhanced mechanical strength, and thermal and electrical conductivity. The small diameter and robust individual carbon-carbon bonds of carbon nanotubes (CNTs), in particular, provide stiffness, strength, and thermal conductivity which exceed most known natural and synthetic materials.
In order to harness these properties, a continuing challenge has been to reliably incorporate CNTs and other CNSs into various structures, preferably in a controlled and ordered fashion. While the preparation of CNTs, in particular, has been successfully scaled up, employing loose CNTs has been problematic due, at least in part, to their tendency to agglomerate. Moreover, when combined in a typical matrix material, CNT loading can be severely limited by the concomitant increases in viscosity, ultimately putting an upper limit on the amount of CNTs that can be placed in the matrix material. As a consequence, there has been increased interest in the preparation of CNTs on various substrates as scaffolds to pre-organize the CNTs and to allow access to higher CNT loadings.
As the means for synthesizing CNSs, such as CNTs, on a variety of substrates begins to mature and industrial scale up begins to take hold, it will be beneficial to put into place measures to ensure quality control of the materials being prepared. Although there are means for analyzing CNT loading of a substrate, there are no real-time quantitative evaluations adapted for in-line use. CNT loading evaluation methods include, for example, thermogravimetric analysis employing CNT burnoff, measuring mass per unit length, and the use of scanning electron microscope (SEM) techniques. Currently, such evaluations are done “offline,” that is, after the material is prepared and via random sampling.
Thermogravimetric analysis employs random sampling and destroys the very substrate being prepared. Measuring mass per unit length provides only an averaged evaluation of loading over an entire stretch of substrate and is difficult to employ real-time and fails to identify regions that may not be up to quality standards. Similarly, SEM techniques are inadequate for large scale quality control assurance, because only random samplings of the CNS-laden substrate are evaluated. Each of these post synthesis analyses may be inadequate to detect problems that may occur, for example, during a long synthesis run. Moreover, the use of CNS-laden materials that may have undesirable imperfections, such as regions of poor CNS coverage, may be catastrophic under high stress conditions of certain downstream applications.
The present invention relates to systems and methods used in the manufacture of carbon nanostructure-laden materials, and more specifically to measuring the resistance of carbon nanostructure-laden materials during their manufacture.
In some embodiments, the present invention provides a quality control system for the manufacture of carbon nanostructure (CNS)-laden substrates comprising a resistance measurement module for continuously measuring the resistance of the (CNS)-laden substrate.
In some embodiments, the present invention provides a method comprising continuously synthesizing carbon nanostructures (CNSs) on a substrate in a CNS growth chamber to provide a CNS-laden substrate and continuously monitoring the resistance of the CNS-laden substrate exiting a distal end of the growth chamber.
The features and advantages of the present invention will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art upon a reading of the description of the various embodiments that follows.
The following figures are included to illustrate certain aspects of the present invention, and should not be viewed as exclusive embodiments. The subject matter disclosed is capable of considerable modification, alteration, and equivalents in form and function, as will occur to those skilled in the art and having the benefit of this disclosure.
a shows a system comprising a resistance measurement module comprising an electric field- or inductive-based device for measurement of resistance.
b shows a system comprising a resistance measurement module comprising a conducting rollers linked to a resistance measurement device.
a-g show exemplary embodiments of a system employing four conductive rollers for measuring resistance of a CNS-laden substrate, in accordance with embodiments disclosed herein.
a-c show the four roller system of
The present invention relates to systems and methods used in the manufacture of carbon nanostructure-laden materials, and more specifically to measuring the resistance of carbon nanostructure-laden materials during their manufacture. In particular, embodiments disclosed herein provide a means of assessing the quality of CNS-laden substrates in real time. That is, the systems and methods employed in various embodiments allow for integration of a quality assessment system in-line as part of the CNS preparation process. This may be accomplished via a resistance measurement module that continuously measures the resistance of a moving substrate onto which CNS structures are being synthesized. Advantageously, when run in real-time in a continuous mode during CNS preparation, feedback mechanisms are readily incorporated and such feedback is reportable to an operator, other instrumentation (such as a CNS growth chamber/module), or both, so that the synthesis conditions may be altered, or, as necessary, operations halted.
Although beneficial to run such assessments in real-time, the resistance measurement module disclosed herein can also stand alone and can be useful for evaluating bulk quantities of materials that may have been prepared elsewhere. This is readily accomplished by independently running the CNS-laden substrate through the resistance measurement module, for example, in a simple spool to spool arrangement with the intervening resistance measurement module. Thus, the evaluation of CNS loading need not be limited to real-time evaluation during synthesis.
The systems and methods disclosed herein are sufficiently versatile that they can be used to evaluate CNS loading values for CNSs grown on a variety of substrates. Systems and methods disclosed herein are particularly well-suited to evaluating CNS growth on fibrous substrates, including, without limitation, carbon, glass, quartz, ceramic, aramids, such as Kevlar, basalt, and metal fibers. Metallic substrates may include, without limitation, aluminum, copper, and steel, for example. Fibrous substrates can take on numerous forms including, without limitation, fibers, tows, yarns, fabrics, tapes, and the like. Other forms, which may be common for metallic substrates include, without limitation plates, foils, thin films, meshes, wires, and the like.
Without being bound by theory, the presence of CNSs on a substrate, regardless of the substrate type, can alter the resistance of the substrate. Such alteration in resistance can be observed for non-conductive substrates such as glass fiber for which the substrate is altered from being electrically insulating to being a conductor as CNS loading is increased. That is, the resistance of the substrate decreases with increased in CNS loading. Such a correlation between CNS loading and resistance has been demonstrated as indicated in
Similar correlations hold for electrically conductive substrates such as carbon fiber for which the substrate may have a bulk conductivity greater than the CNSs grown thereon. In some such embodiments, the resistance may actually increase with increased CNS loading. Regardless of the substrate, the presence of CNSs on a substrate can alter the resistance value and thus, provides a means for correlation to a CNS loading value.
Finally, methods and systems disclosed herein offer the ability to capture CNS loading values on a moving substrate without stopping the line, providing both quality assurance and reduced production times. Data can be collected at very high acquisition rates with multiple readings per second. The systems and methods can be utilized independently of the linespeed of operation, whether the line is moving, for example, at 100 ft/min, 1 ft/min or even if the line has been temporarily stopped i.e. 0 ft/min. During long synthesis runs, methods and systems disclosed herein have the ability to detect changes in loading in real-time continuously throughout a given run providing a means for assessing consistency of CNS growth on manufacturing scale.
As used herein, the term “linespeed” refers to the speed at which a substrate of spoolable dimensions can be fed through the CNS infusion processes described herein, where linespeed is a velocity determined by dividing CNS chamber(s) length by the material residence time.
As used herein the term “spoolable dimensions” refers to fiber, ribbon, tapes, sheet, mesh and similar materials having at least one dimension that is not limited in length, allowing for the material to be stored on a spool or mandrel. Materials of “spoolable dimensions” have at least one dimension that indicates the use of either batch or continuous processing for CNS infusion as described herein. Commercial fiber roving, in particular, can be obtained on 1 oz, ¼, ½, 1, 5, 10, 25 lb, and greater spools, for example. Processes of the invention operate readily with 1 to 25 lb. spools, although larger spools are usable. Moreover, a pre-process operation can be incorporated that divides very large spoolable lengths, for example 100 lb. or more, into easy to handle dimensions, such as two 50 lb spools.
As used herein, the term “carbon nanostructure” (CNS, plural CNSs) refers to a nanostructured carbon network that includes elements of carbon nanotube structure in a complex morphology which can include any combination of branching, entanglement, and the like, while still providing typical mechanical, thermal, and electrical properties to substrates on which they are infused.
As used herein, the term “carbon nanotube” (CNT, plural CNTs) refers to any of a number of cylindrically-shaped allotropes of carbon of the fullerene family including single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWNTs), double-walled carbon nanotubes (DWNTS), multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWNTs). CNTs can be capped by a fullerene-like structure or open-ended. CNSs include those that encapsulate other materials.
As used herein, the term “carbon nanostructure (CNS)-laden substrate” refers to any substrate onto which carbon nanostructures have been infused.
As used herein, the term “infused” means bonded and “infusion” means the process of bonding. Such bonding can involve direct covalent bonding, ionic bonding, pi-pi, and/or van der Waals force-mediated physisorption. For example, CNSs may be infused directly to the substrate whose resistance is to be measured.
As used herein, the term “material residence time” refers to the amount of time a discrete point along a substrate of spoolable dimensions is exposed to CNS growth conditions during the CNS infusion processes described herein. This definition includes the residence time when employing multiple CNS growth chambers.
In some embodiments, the present invention provides a quality control system for the manufacture of carbon nanostructure-laden substrates comprising a resistance measurement module for continuously measuring resistance of the carbon nanostructure (CNS)-laden substrate. In some embodiments, the resistance measurement module measures resistance via an electric field or inductive based measurement. Referring now to
As shown in
In some embodiments, spacing between contacts both vertically (i.e. laterally, see roller examples in
In some embodiments, conductive contacts 250 can be configured to move along substrate 205. In some such embodiments, substrate 205 may be stationary. In other embodiments conductive contacts 250 can be configured to move along substrate 205 which is in motion. In some such embodiments, the direction of the moving conductive contacts 250 may be against the direction of the movement of substrate 205. In some embodiments, conductive contacts 250 may be configured to scan back and forth along substrate 205 while it is in motion. In some embodiments, two point conductive contact 250 can comprise a pair of conducting rollers that are configured to accept substrate 205, for example in a groove.
In some embodiments, system 200 of
In some embodiments, system 200 of
In some embodiments, the CNS-laden substrate is fed continuously to the resistance measurement module from a CNS growth module, the CNS growth module itself being configured to continuously synthesize CNSs on a substrate precursor. Referring now to
The following description is provided as guidance to the skilled artisan for producing carbon nanostructures (CNS)-laden substrates 205 in growth chamber 320. It will be recognized by those skilled in the art, that embodiments describing the preparation of carbon nanostructures on substrates disclosed below are merely exemplary. It is to be understood that the forgoing discussion uses the terms carbon nanostructure (CNS) and carbon nanotubes (CNT) interchangeably, as the exact nature of the CNS product is complex, but has as it primary structural element the carbon nanotube.
In some embodiments, the present invention utilizes fiber tow materials as pre-cursor substrate 305. The processes described herein allow for the continuous production of CNSs of uniform length and distribution along spoolable lengths of tow, roving, tapes, fabrics, meshes, perforated sheets, solid sheets, and ribbons. While various mats, woven and non-woven fabrics and the like can be functionalized by processes of the invention, it is also possible to generate such higher ordered structures from the parent roving, tow, yarn or the like after CNS functionalization of these parent materials. For example, a CNS-infused chopped strand mat can be generated from a CNS-infused fiber roving. As used herein the term “substrate” refers to any material which has fiber as its elementary structural component. The term encompasses, fibers, filaments, yarns, tows, tapes, woven and non-woven fabrics, plies, mats, and meshes.
Compositions having CNS-laden substrates are provided in which the CNSs may be substantially uniform in length. In the continuous process described herein, the residence time of the substrate in a CNS growth chamber can be modulated to control CNS growth and ultimately, CNS length. This provides a means to control specific properties of the CNSs grown. CNS length can also be controlled through modulation of the carbon feedstock and carrier gas flow rates, and growth temperature. Additional control of the CNS properties can be obtained by controlling, for example, the size of the catalyst used to prepare the CNSs. For example, 1 nm transition metal nanoparticle catalysts can be used to provide SWNTs in particular. Larger catalysts can be used to prepare predominantly MWNTs.
Additionally, the CNS growth processes employed are useful for providing CNS-laden substrate 205 with uniformly distributed CNSs on substrates while avoiding bundling and/or aggregation of the CNSs that can occur in processes in which pre-formed CNSs are suspended or dispersed in a solvent solution and applied by hand to the substrate. Such aggregated CNSs tend to adhere weakly to a substrate and the characteristic CNS properties are weakly expressed, if at all. In some embodiments, the maximum distribution density, expressed as percent coverage, that is, the surface area of fiber covered, can be as high as about 55%, assuming CNSs comprising CNTs with about 8 nm diameter with 5 walls. This coverage is calculated by considering the space inside the CNSs as being “fillable” space. Various distribution/density values can be achieved by varying catalyst dispersion on the surface as well as controlling gas composition, linespeed of the process, and reaction temperatures. Typically for a given set of parameters, a percent coverage within about 10% can be achieved across a substrate surface. Higher density and shorter CNSs are useful for improving mechanical properties, while longer CNSs with lower density are useful for improving thermal and electrical properties, although increased density is still favorable. A lower density can result when longer CNSs are grown. This can be the result of employing higher temperatures and more rapid growth causing lower catalyst particle yields.
The CNS-laden substrate 205 can include a substrate such as a metal filament, a fiber yarn, a fiber tow, a metal tape, a fiber-braid, a woven metal fabric, a non-woven fiber mat, a fiber ply, meshes ribbons, solid metal sheets, and perforated metal sheets. Metal filaments include high aspect ratio fibers having diameters ranging in size from between about 10 microns to about 12.5 mm or greater. Fiber tows are generally compactly associated bundles of filaments and are usually twisted together to give ropes.
Ropes include closely associated bundles of twisted filaments. Each filament diameter in a ropes is relatively uniform. Ropes have varying weights described by their ‘tex,’ expressed as weight in grams of 1000 linear meters, or denier, expressed as weight in pounds of 10,000 yards, with a typical tex range usually being between about 4000 tex to about 100000 tex.
Tows include loosely associated bundles of untwisted filaments. As in ropes, filament diameter in a tow is generally uniform. Tows also have varying weights and the tex range is usually between 2000 g and 12000 g. They are frequently characterized by the number of thousands of filaments in the tow, for example 10 wire rope, 50 wire rope, 100 wire rope, and the like.
Metal meshes are materials that can be assembled as weaves or can represent non-woven flattened ropes. Metal tapes can vary in width and are generally two-sided structures similar to ribbon. Processes of the present invention are compatible with CNS infusion on one or both sides of a tape. CNS-infused tapes can resemble a “carpet” or “forest” on a flat substrate surface. Again, processes of the invention can be performed in a continuous mode to functionalize spools of tape.
Fiber-braids represent rope-like structures of densely packed fibers. Such structures can be assembled from ropes, for example. Braided structures can include a hollow portion or a braided structure can be assembled about another core material.
In some embodiments, a number of primary substrate structures can be organized into fabric or sheet-like structures. These include, for example, woven metal meshes non-woven fiber mat and fiber ply, in addition to the tapes described above. Such higher ordered structures can be assembled from parent tows, ropes, filaments or the like, with CNSs already infused in the parent fiber. Alternatively such structures can serve as the substrate for the CNS infusion processes described herein.
Metals substrates can include any metal in zero-valent oxidation state including, for example, d-block metals, lanthanides, actinides, main group metals and the like. Any of these metals can also be used in non-zero-valent oxidation state, including, for example, metal oxides, metal nitrides, and the like. Exemplary d-block metals include, for example, scandium, titanium, vanadium, chromium, manganese, iron, cobalt, nickel, copper, zinc, yttrium, zirconium, niobium, molybdenum, technetium, ruthenium, rhodium, palladium, silver, cadmium, hafnium, tantalum, tungsten, rhenium, osmium, iridium, platinum, and gold. Exemplary main group metals include, for example, aluminum, gallium, indium, tin, thallium, lead, and bismuth. Exemplary metal salts useful in the invention include, for without limitation, oxides, carbides, nitrides, and acetates.
CNSs useful for infusion to substrates include single-walled CNTs, double-walled CNTs, multi-walled CNTs, and mixtures thereof. The exact CNSs to be used depends on the application of the CNS-infused fiber. CNSs can be used for thermal and/or electrical conductivity applications, or as insulators. In some embodiments, the infused CNSs are single-wall nanotubes. In some embodiments, the infused CNSs are multi-wall nanotubes. In some embodiments, the infused CNSs are a combination of single-wall and multi-wall nanotubes. There are some differences in the characteristic properties of single-wall and multi-wall nanotubes that, for some end uses of the fiber, dictate the synthesis of one or the other type of nanotube. For example, single-walled nanotubes can be semi-conducting or metallic, while multi-walled nanotubes are metallic.
CNSs lend their characteristic properties such as mechanical strength, low to moderate electrical resistivity, high thermal conductivity, and the like to the CNS-laden substrate. For example, in some embodiments, the electrical resistivity of a CNS-laden substrate is lower than the electrical resistivity of a parent substrate. The infused CNSs can also provide beneficial conductivity with lighter weights. Moreover, the use of shorter CNSs can be used to provide a greater tensile strength, while also improving electrical conductivity. More generally, the extent to which the resulting CNS-laden substrate expresses these characteristics can be a function of the extent and density of coverage of the fiber by the carbon nanotubes. Any amount of the fiber surface area, from 0-55% of the fiber can be covered assuming an 8 nm diameter, 5-walled MWNT (again this calculation counts the space inside the CNTs as fillable). This number is lower for smaller diameter CNSs and more for greater diameter CNSs. 55% surface area coverage is equivalent to about 15,000 CNSs/micron2. Further CNS properties can be imparted to the substrate in a manner dependent on CNS length, as described above. Infused CNSs can vary in length ranging from between about 1 micron to about 500 microns, including 1 micron, 2 microns, 3 microns, 4 micron, 5, microns, 6, microns, 7 microns, 8 microns, 9 microns, 10 microns, 15 microns, 20 microns, 25 microns, 30 microns, 35 microns, 40 microns, 45 microns, 50 microns, 60 microns, 70 microns, 80 microns, 90 microns, 100 microns, 150 microns, 200 microns, 250 microns, 300 microns, 350 microns, 400 microns, 450 microns, 500 microns, and all values in between. CNSs can also be less than about 1 micron in length, including about 0.5 microns, for example. CNSs can also be greater than 500 microns, including for example, 510 microns, 520 microns, 550 microns, 600 microns, 700 microns and all values in between.
CNSs may have a length from about 1 micron to about 10 microns. Such CNS lengths can be useful in application to increase shear strength. CNSs can also have a length from about 5-70 microns. Such CNS lengths can be useful in application to increase tensile strength if the CNSs are aligned in the fiber direction. CNSs can also have a length from about 10 microns to about 100 microns. Such CNS lengths can be useful to increase electrical/thermal and mechanical properties. The synthesis processes employed can also provide CNSs having a length from about 100 microns to about 500 microns, which can also be beneficial to increase electrical and thermal properties. One skilled in the art will recognize that the properties imparted are a continuum and that some tensile strength benefits can still be realized at longer CNS lengths. Likewise, shorter CNS lengths can still impart beneficial electrical properties as well. Control of CNS length is readily achieved through modulation of carbon feedstock and carrier gas flow rates coupled with varying process linespeeds and reaction temperatures, as described further below.
In some embodiments, spoolable lengths of CNS-laden substrates 205 can have various uniform regions with different lengths of CNSs. For example, it can be desirable to have a first section of CNS-laden substrate with uniformly shorter CNS lengths to enhance tensile and shear strength properties, and a second section of the same spoolable material with a uniform longer CNS length to enhance electrical or thermal properties.
Processes of the invention for CNS infusion to substrates allow control of the CNS lengths with uniformity and in a continuous process allowing spoolable substrates to be functionalized with CNSs at high rates. With material residence times between 5 to 300 seconds, linespeeds in a continuous process for a system that is 3 feet long can be in a range anywhere from about 0.5 ft/min to about 36 ft/min and greater. The speed selected depends on various parameters as explained further below.
In some embodiments, a material residence time in CNS growth chamber 320 of about 5 to about 300 seconds in a CNS growth chamber can produce CNSs having a length between about 1 micron to about 10 microns. In some embodiments, a material residence time of about 30 to about 180 seconds in a CNS growth chamber can produce CNSs having a length between about 10 microns to about 100 microns. In still other embodiments, a material residence time of about 180 to about 300 seconds can produce CNSs having a length between about 100 microns to about 500 microns. One skilled in the art will recognize that these numbers are approximations and that growth temperature and carrier and carbon feedstock flow rates can also impact CNS growth for a given material residence time. For example, increased temperatures typically increase the overall growth rate requiring less material residence time for a desired CNS length. Increased carbon feedstock flow rate ratio (inert to carbon feedstock) can also increase growth rates although this effect is less than changing the growth temperature.
CNS-laden substrate 205 may optionally include a barrier coating. Such barrier coatings may facilitate CNS synthesis on particularly challenging substrate materials. For example, materials that may not directly withstand CNS synthesis temperatures, or substrates on which CNS forming catalysts may be overly mobile on the surface and cause catalyst particles to undesirably agglomerate. Barrier coatings can include, for example, an alkoxysilane, such as methylsiloxane, an alumoxane, alumina nanoparticles, spin on glass and glass nanoparticles. As described below, the CNS-forming catalyst can be added to an uncured barrier coating material and then applied to the substrate together. In other embodiments the barrier coating material can be added to the substrate prior to deposition of the CNS-forming catalyst. The barrier coating material can be of a thickness sufficiently thin to allow exposure of the CNS-forming catalyst to the carbon feedstock for subsequent CVD growth. In some embodiments, the thickness is less than or about equal to the effective diameter of the CNS-forming catalyst. In some embodiments, the thickness is between about 10 nm and about 100 nm. In some embodiments, the thickness can be less than 10 nm, including 1 nm, 2 nm, 3 nm, 4 nm, 5 nm, 6 nm, 7 nm, 8 nm, 9 nm, and any value in between.
Without being bound by theory, the barrier coating can serve as an intermediate layer between the substrate and the CNSs and serves to mechanically infuse the CNSs to the substrate via a locked CNS-forming catalyst nanoparticle that serves as a site CNS growth. Such mechanical infusion provides a robust system in which the substrate serves as a platform for organizing the CNSs while still imparting properties of the CNSs to the substrate. Moreover, the benefit of including a barrier coating is the immediate protection it provides the substrate from chemical damage due to exposure to moisture, oxygen and any thermal effects of alloying, sintering, or the like when heating the substrate at the temperatures used to promote CNS growth.
In some embodiments the present invention provides a continuous process for CNS infusion that includes (a) disposing a carbon nanotube-forming catalyst on a surface of a substrate of spoolable dimensions; and (b) synthesizing carbon nanostructures directly on the substrate, thereby forming a CNS-laden substrate. For a 9 foot long system, the linespeed of the process can range from between about 1.5 ft/min to about 108 ft/min. The linespeeds achieved by the process described herein allow the formation of commercially relevant quantities of CNS-laden substrates with short production times. For example, at 36 ft/min linespeed, the quantities of CNS-infused fibers (over 5% infused CNSs on fiber by weight) can exceed over 250 pound or more of material produced per day in a system that is designed to simultaneously process 5 separate rovings (50 lb/roving). Systems can be made to produce more rovings at once or at faster speeds by repeating growth zones. Moreover, some steps in the fabrication of CNSs, as known in the art, have prohibitively slow rates preventing a continuous mode of operation. For example, in a typical process known in the art, a CNS-forming catalyst reduction step can take 1-12 hours to perform. The process described herein overcomes such rate limiting steps.
The linespeeds achievable using processes of the invention are particular remarkable when considering that some steps in the fabrication of CNSs, as known in the art, have otherwise prohibitively slow rates, thus preventing a continuous mode of operation. For example, in a typical process known in the art, a CNS-forming catalyst reduction step can take 1-12 hours to perform. CNS growth itself can also be time consuming, for example requiring tens of minutes for CNS growth, precluding the rapid linespeeds realized in the present invention. The process described herein overcomes such rate limiting steps.
The CNS-laden substrate-forming processes of the invention can avoid CNS entanglement that occurs when trying to apply suspensions of pre-formed carbon nanotubes to substrates. That is, because pre-formed CNSs are not fused to the substrate, the CNSs tend to bundle and entangle. The result is a poorly uniform distribution of CNSs that weakly adhere to the substrate. However, processes of the present invention can provide, if desired, a highly uniform entangled CNS mat on the surface of the substrate by reducing the growth density. The CNSs grown at low density are infused in the substrate first. In such embodiments, the fibers do not grow dense enough to induce vertical alignment, the result is entangled mats on the substrate surfaces. By contrast, manual application of pre-formed CNSs does not insure uniform distribution and density of a CNS mat on the substrate.
Producing CNS-laden substrate 205 may include at least the operations of functionalizing a substrate to be receptive to barrier coating; applying a barrier coating and a CNS-forming catalyst to the substrate; heating the substrate to a temperature that is sufficient for carbon nanotube synthesis; and Synthesizing CNSs by CVD-mediated growth on the catalyst-laden fiber.
To prepare a substrate for barrier coating, functionalizing the substrate is performed. In some embodiments, functionalizing the substrate can include a wet chemical oxidative etch to create reactive functional groups (metal oxo and/or hydroxyl groups) on the substrate surface. This can be particularly useful when using zero-valent metals to create a surface oxide layer. In other embodiments, functionalizing can include a plasma process, which may serve a dual role of creating functional groups as described above, and roughening the substrate surface to enhance the surface area and wetting properties of the substrate, including the deposition of the barrier coating. To infuse carbon nanotubes into a substrate, the carbon nanotubes are synthesized on a substrate which is conformally coated with a barrier coating. In one embodiment, this is accomplished by conformally coating the substrate with a barrier coating and then disposing CNS-forming catalyst on the barrier coating. In some embodiments, the barrier coating can be partially cured prior to catalyst deposition. This can provide a surface that is receptive to receiving the catalyst and allowing it to embed in the barrier coating, including allowing surface contact between the CNS forming catalyst and the substrate. In such embodiments, the barrier coating can be fully cured after embedding the catalyst. In some embodiments, the barrier coating is conformally coated over the substrate simultaneously with deposition of the CNS-form catalyst. Once the CNS-forming catalyst and barrier coating are in place, the barrier coating can be fully cured.
In some embodiments, the barrier coating can be fully cured prior to catalyst deposition. In such embodiments, a fully cured barrier-coated substrate can be treated with a plasma to prepare the surface to accept the catalyst. For example, a plasma treated substrate having a cured barrier coating can provide a roughened surface in which the CNS-forming catalyst can be deposited. The plasma process for “roughing” the surface of the barrier coating thus facilitates catalyst deposition. The roughness is typically on the scale of nanometers. In the plasma treatment process craters or depressions are formed that are nanometers deep and nanometers in diameter. Such surface modification can be achieved using a plasma of any one or more of a variety of different gases, including, without limitation, argon, helium, oxygen, nitrogen, and hydrogen. In order to treat substrate in a continuous manner, ‘atmospheric’ plasma which does not require vacuum must be utilized. Plasma is created by applying voltage across two electrodes, which in turn ionizes the gaseous species between the two electrodes. A plasma environment can be applied to a fiber substrate in a ‘downstream’ manner in which the ionized gases are flowed down toward the substrate. It is also possible to send the fiber substrate between the two electrodes and into the plasma environment to be treated.
In some embodiments, the precursor substrate 305 can be treated with a plasma environment prior to barrier coating application. For example, a plasma treated substrate can have a higher surface energy and therefore allow for better wet-out and coverage of the barrier coating. The plasma process can also add roughness to the fiber surface allowing for better mechanical bonding of the barrier coating in the same manner as mentioned above.
The CNS catalyst can be prepared as a liquid solution that contains CNS-forming catalyst that includes transition metal nanoparticles. The diameters of the synthesized nanotubes are related to the size of the metal particles as described above. In some embodiments, commercial dispersions of CNS-forming transition metal nanoparticle catalyst are available and are used without dilution, in other embodiments commercial dispersions of catalyst can be diluted. Whether or not to dilute such solutions can depend on the desired density and length of CNS to be grown as described above.
In some embodiments, systems disclosed herein providing CNS growth chamber 320 may be further equipped with a feedback module, the feedback module configured to receive an output from the resistance measurement module, the feedback module being optionally in electronic communication with the CNS growth module and being capable of signaling a change in at least one growth condition in the CNS growth module. Thus, as the resistance of CNS-laden substrate 205 is being monitored, any change in observed resistance can be a signal of altered CNS loading on the substrate as the two are correlated as described above and shown in
In some such embodiments, the at least one growth condition is selected from temperature, a partial pressure of a carbon feedstock gas, a partial pressure of an inert gas, linespeed, and combinations thereof. That is, if the resistance measurement indicates a deficiency in CNS coverage, operating conditions can be altered to compensate. This may be especially beneficial in longer synthesis runs where the buildup of carbonaceous materials on various parts of the synthesis apparatus may impact CNS growth efficiency. In some embodiments, the resistance data, and hence the CNS loading may indicate a halt to operations. In some embodiments, the resistance data may indicate simply adjusting any combination of the aforementioned parameters.
In some embodiments, the feedback module is configured to provide information to an operator in the form of a data log. In some such embodiments, the data log may simply indicate pass/fail criteria for quality control. Pass/fail criteria may include a measurement of CNS loading on the CNS-laden substrate. In some embodiments, where the feedback module reports directly to an operator via, for example, a monitor interface, the operating can make the decision on any parameter to alter. In some embodiments, the feedback module may report via an electronic signal to the growth chamber and its controls. In some such embodiments, the signal may indicate a halt in operations. In other embodiments, the signal may indicate and increase or decrease in temperature, a partial pressure of a carbon feedstock gas, a partial pressure of an inert gas, linespeed, and combinations thereof.
The system of the invention shown in
Referring now to
Systems of the invention may include even further contacts beyond a four point contact. In some such embodiments, one or more further contacts may be disposed between the outer pair, the additional contacts being further configured to take multiple voltage measurements. Such redundant voltage measurements may enhance the accuracy of the resistance measurements and may also, therefore, impact the accuracy of assessing CNS loading on the CNS-laden substrate. In some embodiments, the plurality of measured voltages may be averaged to arrive at an average resistance. In some embodiments, measurement of CNS loading on a CNS-laden substrate may provide the CNS loading figure with an accuracy in a range from about 0.01 weight percent to about 1.0 weight percent, including any value in between. In some embodiments, the accuracy can be in a range from about 0.01 weight percent to about 0.1 weight percent, including any value in between. In some embodiments, the accuracy can be in a range from about 0.1 weight percent to about 0.5 weight percent, including any value in between. The exact degree of accuracy may depend on, inter alia, the degree of CNS loading. For example, with detection at the linear portion of a calibration curve an accuracy of about one percent may read as an equivalent 48 ohm change in resistance. Assuming, for example, an ability to measure plus or minus about one ohm, a low end of detection, accounting for observed noise, may be as low as about 0.01 weight percent.
In accordance with the system embodiments disclosed herein above, the present invention further provides a method comprising continuously synthesizing carbon nanostructures (CNSs) on a substrate in a CNS growth chamber to provide a CNS-laden substrate and continuously monitoring the resistance of the CNS-laden substrate exiting a distal end of the growth chamber, as exemplified in
In some embodiments, methods of the invention may further comprise altering growth conditions in the CNS growth chamber in response to a threshold resistance measurement. In some such embodiments, this may include altering synthesis parameters, halting synthesis, any of which may be accomplished by an operator or, by a signal from the resistance measurement module to the CNS growth chamber.
To facilitate a better understanding of the present invention, the following examples of preferred embodiments are given. In no way should the following examples be read to limit, or to define, the scope of the invention.
This example demonstrates the detection capability of an in-line resistance monitoring system coupled with a continuous CNS-infused glass fiber growth system. In this case, detection of CNS as a function of weight percentage of the final fiber form is shown between 6-11% weight CNS on glass fiber.
Catalyst laden precursor substrate 305 consists of a E-glass fiber which has been catalyzed in a previous process with an iron-based catalyst. In this example, the input catalyst laden precurson substrate 305 remains constant.
The catalyst laden precursor substrate 305 is drawn through CNS growth chamber 310 at a constant rate of 6.1 meters per minute by take up spool 230. The CNS growth system is maintained at a constant growth temperature of 700-800° C. Nitrogen gas is utilized as the inert carrier gas and a hydrocarbon gas such as ethylene, ethane, acetylene, or methane is used as the reactant gas. The ratio of hydrocarbon gas to nitrogen gas is held constant at 0.3 and the total flow rate is modulated between 1.5-3 liters per minute.
By modulating the total flow of the incoming gas and maintaining a constant growth temperature and substrate feed rate, CNS-laden substrate 205 has a controlled amount of CNS growth described by weight percentage of total final fiber weight of between 6 and 11 percent.
CNS-laden substrate 205 is then drawn through a 2-point resistance measurement module 210 which utilizes conductive rollers and bearings to transfer a current supplied by ohm meter 260. Ohm meter 260 is coupled to a data acquisition system (not shown) which continuously acquires resistance measurement data for future correlation to measured CNS weight percent data.
After the CNS laden substrate 205 is drawn through resistance measurement module 210, it is finally wound at take-up spool 230.
The data collected as a result of this example is shown in
It is to be understood that the above-described embodiments are merely illustrative of the present invention and that many variations of the above-described embodiments can be devised by those skilled in the art without departing from the scope of the invention. For example, in this Specification, numerous specific details are provided in order to provide a thorough description and understanding of the illustrative embodiments of the present invention. Those skilled in the art will recognize, however, that the invention can be practiced without one or more of those details, or with other processes, materials, components, etc.
Furthermore, in some instances, well-known structures, materials, or operations are not shown or described in detail to avoid obscuring aspects of the illustrative embodiments. It is understood that the various embodiments shown in the Figures are illustrative, and are not necessarily drawn to scale. Reference throughout the specification to “one embodiment” or “an embodiment” or “some embodiments” means that a particular feature, structure, material, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment(s) is included in at least one embodiment of the present invention, but not necessarily all embodiments. Consequently, the appearances of the phrase “in one embodiment,” “in an embodiment,” or “in some embodiments” in various places throughout the Specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment. Furthermore, the particular features, structures, materials, or characteristics can be combined in any suitable manner in one or more embodiments. It is therefore intended that such variations be included within the scope of the following claims and their equivalents.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2883306 | Cotter | Apr 1959 | A |
2883396 | Cotter | Apr 1959 | A |
3580731 | Milewski et al. | May 1971 | A |
4065592 | McAllister | Dec 1977 | A |
4104083 | Hirano | Aug 1978 | A |
4313084 | Hosokawa et al. | Jan 1982 | A |
4488203 | Muranaka et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
4515107 | Fournier et al. | May 1985 | A |
4530750 | Alsenberg et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4581284 | Eggert et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
4707349 | Hjersted | Nov 1987 | A |
4920917 | Nakatani et al. | May 1990 | A |
5093155 | Miyazaki et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5103067 | Aldissi | Apr 1992 | A |
5130194 | Baker et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5156225 | Murrin | Oct 1992 | A |
5173367 | Liimatta et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5175224 | Horacek | Dec 1992 | A |
5187021 | Vydra et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5221605 | Bard et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5238808 | Bard et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5246794 | Blomgren et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5310687 | Bard et al. | May 1994 | A |
5449574 | Higley | Sep 1995 | A |
5470408 | Nielson et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5514217 | Niino et al. | May 1996 | A |
5547525 | Bennett et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5571749 | Matsuda et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5581438 | Halliop | Dec 1996 | A |
5583318 | Powell | Dec 1996 | A |
5639984 | Nielson | Jun 1997 | A |
5707758 | Iwatsu et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5714089 | Bard et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5731147 | Bard et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5891306 | Chase et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5908585 | Shibuta | Jun 1999 | A |
5949018 | Esker | Sep 1999 | A |
5968274 | Fujioka et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5997832 | Lieber et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6139956 | Endoh et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6140138 | Bard et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6146783 | Brohm et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6180281 | Schneider et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6184280 | Shibuta | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6194685 | Rutherford | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6221154 | Lee et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6225565 | Prysner | May 2001 | B1 |
6232706 | Dai et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6233135 | Farahmandi et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6251520 | Blizzard et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6265466 | Glatkowski et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6331209 | Jang et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6333016 | Resasco et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6361861 | Gao | Mar 2002 | B2 |
6413487 | Resasco et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6420293 | Chang et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6430031 | Dispennette et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6454816 | Lee et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6455021 | Saito | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6465057 | Nakahigashi et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6479028 | Kaner et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6479030 | Firsich | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6491789 | Niu | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6495258 | Chen et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6528572 | Patel et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6564744 | Nakahigashi et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6585152 | Farahmandi et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6602742 | Maletin et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6639786 | Noguchi et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6650531 | Ikeda et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6653619 | Chin et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6673392 | Lee et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6686537 | Gareis et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6692717 | Smalley et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6765949 | Chang | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6773466 | Hiratsuka et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6790425 | Smalley et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6818821 | Fujieda et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6831826 | Iwaida et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6837928 | Zhang et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6852410 | Veedu et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6863942 | Ren et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6887365 | Naughton | May 2005 | B2 |
6887451 | Dodelet et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6900264 | Kumar et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6900580 | Dai et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6908572 | Derbyshire et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6913075 | Knowles et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6934600 | Jang et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6936653 | McElrath et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6949237 | Smalley et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6955800 | Resasco et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6962892 | Resasco et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6967013 | Someya et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6979709 | Smalley et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6986853 | Glatkowski et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6986877 | Takikawa et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6994907 | Resasco et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7011760 | Wang et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7018600 | Yanagisawa et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7022776 | Bastiaens et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7045108 | Jiang et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7056452 | Niu et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7060326 | Hiel et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7061749 | Liu et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7074294 | Dubrow | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7085125 | Sung | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7094386 | Resasco et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7105596 | Smalley et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7108841 | Smalley et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7118693 | Glatkowski et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7125502 | Smalley et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7125534 | Smalley et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7132621 | Kumar et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7144563 | Rao et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7147966 | Ren et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7148619 | Ken et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7151129 | Ishikawa et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7153452 | Ogale et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7157068 | Li et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7160532 | Liu et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7189959 | Morison et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7211320 | Cooper et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
7226643 | Juang et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7235159 | Gu et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7253442 | Huang et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7261779 | Gardner | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7265174 | Carroll et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7265175 | Winey et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7278324 | Smits et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7282260 | LeGrande | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7289312 | Duff, Jr. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7294302 | Kolde et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7312608 | Georgeson et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7329698 | Noguchi et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7338684 | Curliss et al. | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7340134 | Hudson, II et al. | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7352559 | Sung | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7354877 | Rosenberger et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7354881 | Resasco et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7354988 | Charati et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7372880 | Jablonski et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7384663 | Olry et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7399794 | Harmon et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7407640 | Barrera et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7407901 | Bystricky et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7410628 | Bening et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7419601 | Cooper et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7431965 | Grigorian et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7435476 | Viswanathan et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7442284 | Ren et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7445817 | Kumar et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7448441 | Hendricks et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7448931 | Liu et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7449631 | Lee et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7459627 | Lee et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7465605 | Raravikar et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7466539 | Dementiev et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7473466 | Muradov | Jan 2009 | B1 |
7479052 | Kim et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7488455 | Dai et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7504078 | Jacques et al. | Mar 2009 | B1 |
7510695 | Smalley et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7610695 | Smalley et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7531267 | Kim | May 2009 | B2 |
7532454 | Plee et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7534486 | Boerstoel et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7553341 | Pan et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7563411 | Jiang et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7563428 | Resasco et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7569425 | Huang et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7579112 | Chiang et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7588700 | Kwon et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7592248 | Ventzek et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7597869 | Hsiao | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7608798 | Kumar et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7611579 | Lashmore et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7612985 | Dementiev et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7615204 | Ajayan et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7615205 | Jiang et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7632550 | Mizuno et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7632569 | Smalley et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7700943 | Raravikar et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7709087 | Majidi et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7718220 | D'Silva et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7771798 | Grosse et al. | Aug 2010 | B1 |
7776777 | Kim et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7793653 | Kuckelkorn et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7811632 | Eres | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7815820 | Tan et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7816709 | Balzano et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7820329 | Boulton et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7862795 | Zhang et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7871591 | Harutyunyan et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7880376 | Takai et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7927701 | Curliss et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8373971 | Young | Feb 2013 | B2 |
20020035170 | Glatkowski et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020048143 | Lee et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020085968 | Smalley et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020090330 | Smalley et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020098135 | Smalley et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020136683 | Smalley et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030042147 | Talin et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030044678 | ESq. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030055153 | Luippold et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030102585 | Poulin et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030111333 | Montgomery et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030143453 | Ren et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040007955 | Yaniv et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040018375 | Banno et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040020681 | Hjortstam et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040026234 | Vanden Brande et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040029019 | Clarke et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040055631 | Szymocha et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040071870 | Knowles et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040082247 | Desai et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040096389 | Lobovsky et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040105807 | Fan et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040111141 | Brabec et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040166417 | Nishio et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040184981 | Liu et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040197546 | Rinzler et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040210289 | Wang et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040241532 | Kim | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040245088 | Gardner | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040253167 | Silva et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050090176 | Dean et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050100501 | Veedu et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050112052 | Gu et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050113876 | Weiner et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050119371 | Drzal et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050150620 | Hamada et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050170177 | Crawford et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050172370 | Haq et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050176329 | Olry et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050188727 | Greywall | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050214648 | Boulton et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050231893 | Harvey | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050238810 | Scaringe et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050260412 | Gardner | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050263456 | Cooper et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050287064 | Mayne et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060052509 | Saitoh | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060054866 | Ait-Haddou et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060063065 | Clarke et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060110599 | Honma et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060121275 | Poulin et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060126268 | Sung | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060159916 | Dubrow et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060177602 | Dijon et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060198956 | Eres | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060233692 | Scaringe et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060241236 | Kuznetsov et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060249203 | Li et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060253942 | Barrera et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070020167 | Han et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070036709 | Lashmore et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070048521 | Istvan | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070054105 | Hsiao | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070062799 | Lee | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070070579 | Sung | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070076349 | Dementiev et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070092431 | Resasco et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070110977 | Al-Haik et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070128960 | Ghasemi Nejhad et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070134555 | Ren et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070135588 | Diakoumakos et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070166603 | Nakanishi et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070189953 | Bai et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070237990 | Kim | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070241962 | Shinoda et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070259128 | Parsapour | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070293086 | Liu et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080010796 | Pan et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080014431 | Lashmore et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080020193 | Jang et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080048364 | Armeniades et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080049380 | Miyahara et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080053922 | Honsinger, Jr. et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080057265 | Liang et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080063585 | Smalley et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080075954 | Wardle et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080102371 | Mitchell et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080117562 | Maruyama et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080118753 | Poulin et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080137890 | Petersen et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080146440 | Westin et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080160286 | Asrar et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080170982 | Zhang et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080173111 | Thostenson et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080182108 | Curliss et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080187482 | Chen et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080187648 | Hart et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080195187 | Li et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080212261 | Ajayan et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080247938 | Tsai et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080248192 | Long et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080248362 | Sayre et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080251971 | Kim et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080254675 | Lee et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080273290 | Dementiev et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080279753 | Harutyunyan | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080286564 | Tsotsis | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080296558 | Choi et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080297980 | Bourcier et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080299308 | Luo et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090017301 | Moireau | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090020734 | Jang et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090029127 | Watanabe et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090047453 | Folaron et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090047502 | Folaron et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090053512 | Pyun et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090059474 | Zhamu et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090068387 | Panzer et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090068461 | Reneker et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090072222 | Radisic et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090081383 | Alberding et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090081441 | Shah et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090087743 | Kim et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090092832 | Moireau | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090095051 | Suzuki et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090098453 | Liu et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090099016 | Carruthers et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090117269 | Hansen et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090121219 | Song et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090126783 | Lin et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090136707 | Ueno | May 2009 | A1 |
20090140098 | Lengsfeld et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090176100 | Higashi et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090176112 | Kruckenberg et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090181309 | Kwon et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090185327 | Seymour | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090186214 | Lafdi et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090186276 | Zhamu et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090191352 | DuFaux et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090192241 | Raravikar et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090194313 | Jiang et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090208743 | Pettit | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090212430 | Wyland | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090214800 | Saito | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090214944 | Rojeski | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090220409 | Curliss et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090226673 | Friedersdorf et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090244810 | Reynolds | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090255706 | Jiang et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090258164 | Nakai et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090262484 | Miyagi | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090272946 | Lu | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090282671 | Tao et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090286079 | Barker et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090294022 | Hayes et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090294753 | Hauge et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090305135 | Shi et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090311166 | Hart et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090314510 | Kukowski et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090325076 | Matsui et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100000520 | Vachon | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100000754 | Mann et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100000770 | Gupta et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100035124 | Thompson et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100059243 | Chang | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100074834 | Kim | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100087042 | Kim et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100098931 | Daniel et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100099319 | Lashmore et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100159240 | Shah et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100173228 | Wallace et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100178531 | Amaratunga et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100178825 | Shah et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100188833 | Liang et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100192851 | Shah et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100196695 | Garcia et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100196697 | D'Silva et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100197848 | Verghese et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100203362 | Lam et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100206504 | Akiyama et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100210159 | Zhu | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100221424 | Malecki et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100224129 | Malecki et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100227134 | Shah et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100227155 | Bao et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100254885 | Menchhofer et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100258111 | Shah et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100270069 | Shar et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100270513 | Haylock et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100271253 | Shah et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100272891 | Malecki et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100276072 | Shah et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100279569 | Shah et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100286395 | Newkome et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100311866 | Huang et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100330421 | Cui et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110024409 | Shah et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110024694 | Shah et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110036829 | Fugetsu et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110089958 | Malecki et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110104571 | Zhamu et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110123735 | Shah et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110124253 | Shah et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110124483 | Shah et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110143087 | Alberding et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110159365 | Loveness et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110159381 | Doe et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110163274 | Plee et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110171469 | Shah et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110174519 | Shah et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110186775 | Shah et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110216476 | Fleischer et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110235240 | Lu et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110242731 | Fleischer et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110281068 | David et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110287318 | Loveness et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110297892 | Shah et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110304964 | Fleischer et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120000691 | Shah et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120052363 | Fleischer et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1363123 | Aug 2002 | CN |
1838999 | Sep 2006 | CN |
1970612 | May 2007 | CN |
101189930 | May 2008 | CN |
101365740 | Feb 2009 | CN |
101654555 | Feb 2010 | CN |
101698975 | Apr 2010 | CN |
01900DE2008 | Mar 2010 | IN |
61-157495 | Jul 1986 | JP |
H-05-269874 | Oct 1993 | JP |
H 07-134911 | May 1995 | JP |
H 11-134949 | May 1999 | JP |
2001-517583 | Oct 2001 | JP |
2002-515847 | May 2002 | JP |
2003-239171 | Aug 2003 | JP |
2004-039668 | Feb 2004 | JP |
2004247064 | Sep 2004 | JP |
2005-353493 | Dec 2005 | JP |
2005-538026 | Dec 2005 | JP |
2007-070593 | Mar 2007 | JP |
2007-515364 | Jun 2007 | JP |
2007-194354 | Aug 2007 | JP |
2007-220841 | Aug 2007 | JP |
2007-246317 | Sep 2007 | JP |
2008-010329 | Jan 2008 | JP |
2008-270807 | Nov 2008 | JP |
2008-296338 | Dec 2008 | JP |
2009-173476 | Aug 2009 | JP |
2009-190948 | Aug 2009 | JP |
2009-533831 | Sep 2009 | JP |
2009-252745 | Oct 2009 | JP |
2009-535530 | Oct 2009 | JP |
2009-537339 | Oct 2009 | JP |
100829001 | May 2008 | KR |
200833861 | Aug 2008 | TW |
WO 03082733 | Oct 2003 | WO |
WO 2006048531 | May 2006 | WO |
WO-2006080702 | Aug 2006 | WO |
WO 2006115486 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO 2007015710 | Feb 2007 | WO |
WO 2007061854 | May 2007 | WO |
WO 2007089118 | Aug 2007 | WO |
WO 2007149109 | Dec 2007 | WO |
WO 2008012196 | Jan 2008 | WO |
WO-2008035730 | Mar 2008 | WO |
WO 2008041183 | Apr 2008 | WO |
WO-2008054409 | May 2008 | WO |
WO 2008054541 | May 2008 | WO |
WO 2008085634 | Jul 2008 | WO |
WO-2008085550 | Jul 2008 | WO |
WO 2008115168 | Sep 2008 | WO |
WO 2008115640 | Sep 2008 | WO |
WO-2008133299 | Nov 2008 | WO |
WO 2008145787 | Dec 2008 | WO |
WO 2009004346 | Jan 2009 | WO |
WO 2009110885 | Sep 2009 | WO |
WO-2009125421 | Oct 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Parikh et al. Flexible vapour sensors using single walled carbon nanotubes, Sensors and Actuators B, 113, 2006 pp. 55-63. |
Rebouillat et al. Measuring the Electrical Conductivity of Single Fibres, Int. J. Electrochem. Sci., 6 (2011) 5731-5740. |
Park et al. Strain-dependent electrical resistance of multi-walled carbon nanotube/polymer composite films, Nanotechnology 19 (2008) 055705, pp. 1-7. |
Garcia, et al., “Fabrication and multifunctional properties of a hybrid laminate with aligned carbon nanotubes grown In Situ”, Composites Science and Technology, Jul. 1, 2008, pp. 2034-2041, vol. 68, No. 9. |
Ago, et al., “Colloidal Solution of Metal Nanoparticles as a Catalyst for Carbon Nanotube Growth”, Proceedings Materials Research Society, Fall 2000, pp. A13.18.1-A13.18.5, vol. 633, Materials Research Society. |
Andrews, et al., “Nanotube Composite Carbon Fibers,” Applied Physics Letters, Aug. 1999, vol. 75, No. 9, pp. 1329-1331. |
Arepalli, et al., “Carbon-Nanotube-Based Electrochemical Double-Layer Capacitor Technologies for Spaceflight Applications,” JOM, Dec. 2005, pp. 26-31. |
Bradford, et al., “Electrical Conductivity Study of Carbon nanotube Yarns, 3-D Hybrid Braids and their Composites”, Jouranl of Composite Materials, pp. 1533-1545, vol. 42, No. 15, SAGE Productions, Los Angeles, London, New Delhi and Singapore. |
Bubert, et al., “Basic analytical investigation of plasma-chemically modified carbon fibers”, Spectrochimica Acta Part B., 2002, pp. 1601-1610, vol. 57, Elsevier Science B.V. |
Chae, et al., “A comparison of reinforcement efficiency of various types of carbon nanotubes in polyacrylonitrile fiber”, Polymer, Nov. 21, 2005, pp. 10925-10935, vol. 46, No. 24, Elsevier Ltd. |
Che, et al., “Chemical Vapor Deposition Based Synthesis of Carbon Nanotubes and Nanofibers Using a Template Method”, Chem. Mater., 1998, pp. 260-267, vol. 10, American Chemical Society. |
Chen, et al., “Basalt fiber-epoxy laminates with functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotubes”, Composites, Part A, 2009, pp. 1082-1089, vol. 40, Elsevier Ltd. |
Chen, et al., “Pulsed electrodeposition of Pt nanoclusters on carbon nanotubes modified carbon materials using diffusion restricting viscous electroyles”, Electrochemistry Communications, Jun. 2007, pp. 1348-1354, vol. 9, Elsevier B.V. |
Ci, et al., “Direct Growth of Carbon Nanotubes on the Surface of Ceramic Fibers”, Carbon, 2005, pp. 883-886, vol. 43, No. 4, Elsevier Ltd. |
Cui, et al., “Carbon—Silicon Core-Shell Nanowires As High Capacity Electrode For Lithium Ion Batteries,” American Chemical Society, vol. xx, No. x. |
Franz, et al., “Carbon Single-Wall Nanotube Growth in a Volumetrically Confined Arc Discharge System”, U.S. Departement of Energy Journal of Undergraduate Research, pp. 66-69, publication date unknown. |
Garcia, et al., “Aligned Carbon Nanotube Reinforcement of Advanced Composite Ply Interfaces,” 49th AIAA/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Apr. 7-10, 2008, Schaumburg, IL, MIT, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc. |
Hsieh, et al., “Synthesis of Carbon Nanotubes on Carbon Fabric for Use as electrochemical Capacitor,” Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, (2009), pp. 155-159, vol. 122. |
Hsu, et al., “Optical Absorption and Thermal Transport of Individual Suspended Carbon Nanotube Bundles”, Nano Lett., 2009, pp. 590-594, vol. 9, No. 2, American Chemical Society, Publication Date (Web): Jan. 13, 2009. |
Jiang, et al., “Carbon nanotube-coated solid-phase microextraction metal fiber based on sol-gel technique”, Journal of Chromatography A., May 29, 2009, pp. 4641-4647, vol. 1216, Elsevier B.V. |
Jiang, et al., “Plasma-Enhanced Deposition of Silver Nanoparticles onto Polymer and Metal Surfaces for the Generation of Antimicrobial Characteristics”, Journal of Applied—Polymer Science, 2004, pp. 1411-1422, vol. 93, Wiley Periodicals, Inc. |
Jo, et al., “Field Emission of Carbon Nanotubes Grown on Carbon Cloth,” Applied Physics Letters, Aug. 2, 2004, pp. 810-812, vol. 85, No. 5. |
Jung, et al., “Fabrication of radar absorbing structure (RAS) using GFR-nano composite and spring-back compensation of hybrid composite RAS shells”, Composite Structures, 2006, pp. 571-576, vol. 75, Elsevier Ltd. |
Kim, et al., “Processing, characterization, and modeling of carbon nanotube-reinforced multiscale composites,” Composites Science and Technology, 2009, pp. 335,342, vol. 69, Elsevier Ltd. |
Kind, et al., “Patterned Films of Nanotubes Using Microcontact Printing of Catalysts”, Adv. Mater., 1999, pp. 1285-1289, vol. 11, No. 15, Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH, D-69469 Weinheim. |
Kramer, et al., Constrained Iron Catalysts for Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube Growth?, Langmuir 2005, 21, 8466-8470 [http://pubs.acs.org/dol/abs/10.1021/la0506729]. |
Laachachi, et al., “A chemical method to graft carbon nanotubes onto a carbon fiber”, Materials Letters, 2008, pp. 394-397, vol. 62, Elsevier B.V. |
Lee, “Syntheses and properties of fluorinated carbon materials”, Journal of Fluorine Chemistry, 2007, pp. 392-403, vol. 128, Elsevier B.V. |
Lee, et al., “Fabrication and design of multi-layered radar absorbing structures of MWNT-filled glass/epoxy plain-weave composites”, Composite Structures, 2006, pp. 397-405, vol. 76, Elsevier Ltd. |
Li, et al., “A Miniature glucose/O2 biofuel cell with single-walled carbon nanotubes-modified carbon fiber microelectrodes as the substrate”, Electrochemistry Communications, Jun. 2008, pp. 851-854, vol. 10, Elsevier B.V. |
Li, et al., “Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) Shielding of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube Epoxy Composites”, Nano Lett., 2006, pp. 1141-1145, vol. 6, No. 6, American Chemical Society. |
Makris, et al., “Carbon Nanotubes Growth and Anchorage to Carbon Fibres”, Carbon Nanotubes, 2006, pp. 57-58, vol. 222, Springer, the Netherlands. |
Meyyappan, et al., “Carbon nanotube growth by PECVD: a review”, Plasma Sources Sci. Technol., 2003, pp. 205-216, vol. 12, IOP Publishing Ltd, UK. |
Mylvaganam, “Fabrication and Application of Polymer Composites Comprising Carbon Nanotubes”, Recent Pat Nanotechnol., 2007, pp. 59-65, vol. 1, Bentham Science Publishers, Ltd. |
Panhuis, et al., “Carbon Nanotube Mediated Reduction in Optical Activity in Polyaniline Composite Materials”, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2008, pp. 1441-1445, vol. 112, American Chemical Society. |
Parrish, “Carbon Nanotubes and Carbon Layer Nanostructured Composites Grown in Improved Process,” Capella University, Before It's News, Jul. 9, 2010. |
Pisco, et al., “Hollow fibers integrated with single walled carbon nanotubes: Bandgap modification and chemical sensing capability”, Sensors and Actuators B, 2008, pp. 163-170, vol. 129, Elsevier B.V. |
Ra{hacek over (c)}kauskas “Carbon nanotube growth and use in energy sector”, Energetika, 2006, pp. 43-46, vol. 2. |
Satishkumar, et al., “Bundles of aligned carbon nanotubes obtained by the pyrolysis of ferrocene-hydrocarbon mixtures: role of the metal nanoparticles produced in situ”, Chemical Physics Letters, 1999, pp. 158-162, vol. 307, Elsevier Science B.V. |
Suh, et al., “Highly ordered two-dimensional carbon nanotube arrays”, Applied Physics Letters, Oct. 4, 2002, pp. 2047-2049, vol. 75, No. 14, American Institute of Physics. |
Thostenson et al., “Carbon Nanotube Networks: Sensing of distributed Strain and Damage for Life Prediction and Self Healing,” Advanced Materials, Oct. 2, 1006, vol. 18, Iss. 21, pp. 2837-2841. |
Wang, et al., “Penetration depth of atmospheric pressure plasma surface modification into multiple layers of polyester fabrics”, Surface and Coatings Technology, 2007, pp. 77-83, vol. 202, Elsevier B.V. |
Wang, et al., “Processing and property investigation of single-walled carbon nanotube (SWNT) buckypaper/epoxy resin matrix nanocomposites”, Composites: Part A, 2004, pp. 1225-1232, vol. 35, Elsevier Ltd. |
Wichmann, et al., “Glass-fibre-reinforced composites with enhanced mechanical and electrical properties—Benefits and limitations of a nanoparticle modified matrix”, Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2006, pp. 2346-2359, vol. 73, Elisevier Ltd. |
Xu, et al., “Bone-Shaped Nanomaterials for Nanocomposite Applications”, Nano Lett., 2003, pp. 1135-1139, vol. 3, No. 8, American Chemical Society. |
Yabe, et al., Synthesis of well-aligned carbon nanotubes by radio frequency plasma enhanced CVD method, Diamond and Related Materials, 2004, pp. 1292-1295, vol. 13, Elsevier B.V. |
Yanagishita, et al., “Carbon Nanotubes with a Triangular Cross-section, Fabricated Using Anodic Porous Alumina as the Temple”, Adv. Mater., 204, pp. 429-432, vol. 16, No. 5, Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim. |
Yang, et al., “Electrical Conductivity and Electromagnetic Interference Shielding of Multi-walled Carbon Nanotube Filled Polymer Composites” Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 2005, pp. HH5.3.1-HH.5.3.5, vol. 858E, Materials Research Society. |
Yeh, et al., “Mechanical properties of phenolic-based nanocomposites reinforced by multi-walled carbon nanotubes and carbon fibers”, Composites: Part A, 2008, pp. 677-684, vol. 39, No. 4. |
Zhang et al., “Integration and characterization of aligned carbon nanotubes on metal/silicon substrates and effects of water”, Applied Surface Science 255 (2009) 5003-5008, entire document. |
Zhang, et al., “In situ growth of carbon nanotubes on inorganic fibers with different surface properties,” Materials Chemistry and Physics, 2008, pp. 317-321, vol. 107, Science Direct. |
Zhao et al., “The Use of Carbon Nanotubes to Sense Matrix Stresses Around a Single Glass Fiber,” Composites Science and Technology, Nov. 2001, vol. 61, No. 14, pp. 2139-2143. |
Zhao, et al., “Carbon Nanosheets as the Electrode Material in Supercapacitors,” Journal of Power Sources 194 (2009 pp. 1208-1212. |
Zhao, et al., “Growth of carbon nanotubes on the surface of carbon fibers”, Carbon, 2007, pp. 380-383, vol. 46, No. 2, Elsevier Ltd. |
Zhao, et al., “The growth of multi-walled carbon nanotubes with different morphologies on carbon fibers”, Carbon, 2005, pp. 651-673, vol. 43, Elsevier Ltd. |
Zhu, et al., “Carbon nanotube growth on carbon fibers”, Diamond and Related Materials, 2003, pp. 1825-1825, vol. 12, Elsevier B.V. |
Zhu, et al., “Synthesis of single-walled carbon nanotubes by the vertical floating catalyst method,” Chinese Science Bulletin, 2002, pp. 159-162, vol. 47, No. 2. |
Hou et al., “A resistance-based damage location sensor for carbon-fibre composites”, Smart Materials and Structures, Nov. 4, 2002, vol. 11, pp. 966-969. |
Thostenson et al., “Real-time in situ sensing of damage evolution in advanced fiber composites using carbon nanotube networks”, Nanotechnology, Apr. 23, 2008, vol. 19. |
Buehler GmbH, Safety Data Sheet 1907/2006/EC (GB) Buehler EpoThin Hardener, revised Apr. 21, 2008, 5 pages. |
Buehler GmbH, Safety Data Sheet 1907/2006/EC (GB) Buehler EpoThin Resin, revised Apr. 21, 2008, 5 pages. |
CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 95th Edition, 2014-2015, Physical Constants of Inorganic Compounds, p. 4-45. |
The University of Edinburgh School of GeoSciences, Sample Preparation Procedures, revised Aug. 23, 2008, 6 pages. |
Fiedler et al, “Can Carbon Nanotubes Be Used to Sense Damage in Composites?”, Annales de Chimie—Science des Materiaux, 2004, vol. 29, No. 6, pp. 81-94. |
vanSchalkwijk, et al., “Advances in Lithium-Ion Batteries,” Kluwer Academic Plenum Publishers, 2002, p. 499. |
Ma, et al., “Electrochemical properties of manganese oxide coated onto carbon nanotubes for energy-storage applications,” Dec. 2007, Journal of Power Sources, pp. 483-489, vol. 178, No. 1. |
Lee, et al., “Fabrication of polypyrrole (PPy)/carbon nanotube (CNT) composite electrode on ceramic fabric for supercapacitor applications,” Jun. 2011, Electrochimica ACTA, pp. 7460-7466, vol. 56, No. 22. |
Stoller, et al., “Best practice methods for determining an electrode material's performance for ultracapacitors,” Jan. 2010, Energy & Environmental Science, pp. 1294-1301, vol. 3, No. 9. |
CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 95th Edition, 2014-2015, Physical Constants of Inorganic Compounds, p. 4-88. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130236631 A1 | Sep 2013 | US |