The gathering of downhole information has been done by the oil industry for many years. Modern petroleum drilling and production operations demand a great quantity of information relating to the parameters and conditions downhole. Such information typically includes the location and orientation of the wellbore and drilling assembly, earth formation properties, and drilling environment parameters downhole. The collection of information relating to formation properties and conditions downhole is commonly referred to as “logging”, and can be performed during the drilling process itself.
Various measurement tools exist for use in wireline logging and logging while drilling. One such tool is the resistivity tool, which includes one or more antennas for transmitting an electromagnetic signal into the formation and one or more antennas for receiving a formation response. When operated at low frequencies, the resistivity tool may be called an “induction” tool, and at high frequencies it may be called an electromagnetic wave propagation tool. Though the physical phenomena that dominate the measurement may vary with frequency, the operating principles for the tool are consistent. In some cases, the amplitude and/or the phase of the receive signals are compared to the amplitude and/or phase of the transmit signals to measure the formation resistivity. In other cases, the amplitude and/or phase of the receive signals are compared to each other to measure the formation resistivity.
When plotted as a function of depth or tool position in the borehole, the resistivity tool measurements are termed “logs” or “resistivity logs”. Such logs may provide indications of hydrocarbon concentrations and other information useful to drillers and completion engineers. However, such logs may exhibit limited spatial resolution and boundary-related artifacts that make interpretation difficult, particularly in situations where the borehole penetrates formations at an angle. Various techniques exist for processing logs to improve resolution and reduce artifacts, but such techniques may not be feasible for use in a real-time environment.
In the following detailed description of the various disclosed embodiments, reference will now be made to the accompanying drawings in which:
While the described embodiments are susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, specific examples thereof are shown for illustrative purposes and will be described in detail below. It should be understood, however, that the drawings and detailed description thereto are not intended to limit the claims to the particular examples described, but on the contrary, the intention is to cover all modifications, equivalents and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the present invention as defined by the appended claims.
Certain terms are used throughout the following description and claims to refer to particular system components and configurations. As one skilled in the art will appreciate, companies may refer to a component by different names. This document does not intend to distinguish between components that differ in name but not function. In the following discussion and in the claims, the terms “including” and “comprising” are used in an open-ended fashion, and thus should be interpreted to mean “including, but not limited to . . . ”. Also, the term “couple” or “couples” is intended to mean either an indirect or a direct electrical connection. Thus, if a first device couples to a second device, that connection may be through a direct electrical connection, or through an indirect electrical connection via other devices and connections. In addition, the term “attached” is intended to mean either an indirect or a direct physical connection. Thus, if a first device attaches to a second device, that connection may be through a direct physical connection, or through an indirect physical connection via other devices and connections.
The foregoing background section identifies various potential shortcomings of existing resistivity logging systems and methods that are at least in part addressed by the systems and methods disclosed below. Some resistivity logging system embodiments include an azimuthally sensitive resistivity tool that makes at least one formation resistivity measurement and at least one boundary detection measurement that can be combined to reduce boundary-related artifacts in the formation resistivity measurement. Various logging method embodiments employ the boundary detection measurement to operate on the formation resistivity measurement to reduce boundary-related artifacts in a number of ways.
As one illustrative context for the disclosed systems and methods,
Drilling fluid, termed mud, is pumped by mud recirculation equipment 16 through supply pipe 18, through drilling kelly 10, and down through the drill string 8 at high pressures and volumes to emerge through nozzles or jets in the drill bit 14. The mud then travels back up the hole via the annulus formed between the exterior of the drill string 8 and the borehole wall 20, through a blowout preventer, and into a mud pit 24 on the surface. On the surface, the drilling mud is cleaned and then recirculated by recirculation equipment 16.
Logging while drilling (LWD) sensors 26 are located in the drillstring 8 near the drill bit 14. Sensors 26 include directional instrumentation and a modular resistivity tool with tilted antennas for detecting bed boundaries. The directional instrumentation measures the inclination angle, the horizontal angle, and the rotational angle (a.k.a. “tool face angle”) of the LWD tools. As is commonly defined in the art, the inclination angle is the deviation from vertically downward, the horizontal angle is the angle in a horizontal plane from true North, and the tool face angle is the orientation (rotational about the tool axis) angle from the high side of the well bore. In some embodiments, directional measurements are made as follows: a three axis accelerometer measures the earth's gravitational field vector relative to the tool axis and a point on the circumference of the tool called the “tool face scribe line”. (The tool face scribe line is drawn on the tool surface as a line parallel to the tool axis.) From this measurement, the inclination and tool face angle of the LWD tool can be determined. Additionally, a three axis magnetometer measures the earth's magnetic field vector in a similar manner. From the combined magnetometer and accelerometer data, the horizontal angle of the LWD tool can be determined. In addition, a gyroscope or other form of inertial sensor may be incorporated to perform position measurements and further refine the orientation measurements.
In a some embodiments, downhole sensors 26 are coupled to a telemetry transmitter 28 that transmits telemetry signals by modulating the resistance to mud flow in drill string 8. A telemetry receiver 30 is coupled to the kelly 10 to receive transmitted telemetry signals. Other telemetry transmission techniques are well known and may be used. The receiver 30 communicates the telemetry to a surface installation (not shown) that processes and stores the measurements. The surface installation typically includes a computer system of some kind, e.g. a desktop computer, that may be used to inform the driller of the downhole measurements such as formation resistivity and/or relative position and distance between the drill bit and nearby bed boundaries.
The drill bit 14 is shown penetrating a formation having a series of layered beds 34 dipping at an angle. A first (x,y,z) coordinate system associated with the sensors 26 is shown, and a second coordinate system (x″,y″,z″) associated with the beds 32 is shown. The bed coordinate system has the z″ axis perpendicular to the bedding plane, has the y″ axis in a horizontal plane, and has the x″ axis pointing “downhill”. The angle between the z-axes of the two coordinate systems is referred to as the “dip” and is shown in
Referring now to
Coils 104 and 116 are coaxial with tool 102, meaning that the axes of coils 104 and 116 coincide with the tool axis. The illustrated tool 102 further includes a first angled recess 108 having a tilted coil antenna 110, and a second angled recess 112 having a second tilted coil antenna 114. The term “tilted” indicates that the plane of the coil is not perpendicular to the tool axis.
In some contemplated embodiments, coils 104 and 116 are used as transmitter antennas, and coils 110 and 114 are used as receiving antennas. However, one of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that the transmitting and receiving roles may be readily interchanged. Moreover, in some alternative embodiments, coils 104 and 116 may be tilted while coils 110 and 114 are coaxial. In operation, a transmitter coil 104 transmits an interrogating electromagnetic signal which propagates through the well bore and into the surrounding formation. Signals from the formation reach receiver coils 110, 114, inducing a signal voltage that is detected and measured to determine an amplitude attenuation and phase shift between coils 110 and 112. The measurement is repeated using transmitter 116. From the measured attenuation and phase shifts, the resistivity of the formation can be estimated using conventional techniques.
In the illustrated embodiment of
As suggested in U.S. Pat. No. 7,138,803, “Electromagnetic Wave Resistivity Tool Having a Tilted Antenna for Geosteering within a Desired Payzone,” to Michael Bittar, the receivers of tool 102 have azimuthal sensitivities in opposite directions when receiving from the different transmitters. The phase differences in response to the first and second transmitters can be expressed as:
δT1(γ)=ΦR1T1(γ)−ΦR2T1(γ) (1)
δT2(γ)=ΦR2T2(γ)−ΦR1T2(γ) (2)
where, e.g., ΦR2T1 represents the phase of Receiver 2's voltage signal in response to the signal sent by Transmitter 1, and angle γ is the rotational orientation of the tool. Apart from a longitudinal shift in tool position,
δT2(γ)≅δT1(γ+180°). (3)
This observation will be helpful to the understanding relationships between the various alternative bed boundary indicators below.
In block 420, a bed boundary indicator is calculated from the attenuation and/or phase measurements of blocks 410 and 415. The bed boundary indicator is a signal having a magnitude that is near zero for distant boundaries and grows larger for nearby boundaries. The polarity of the bed boundary indicator may be indicative of whether the boundary is with a bed of higher or lower resistivity than the current bed. The bed boundary indicators described hereafter are derived from observations in opposite azimuthal directions. One bed boundary indicator is:
I(γ)=δT1(γ)−δT1(γ+180°). (4)
Equations (3) and (4) can be combined to create an alternative bed boundary indicator:
I(γ)=δT1(γ)−δT2(γ). (5)
Or, rather than simply comparing in opposite directions, an integral or average may be used as a baseline for determining the indicator:
where γ is now expressed in radians. As yet another alternative, equations (6) and (7) may be averaged or added together (after accounting for the longitudinal shift):
A potential advantage of using measurements from both transmitter antennas (and accounting for the appropriate longitudinal shift) is that the inherent errors of the phase measurement circuitry (perhaps due to thermal drift) can be automatically compensated.
The foregoing bed boundary indicators have been based on the measured phase shift. An alternative basis for the bed boundary indicators is the attenuation:
δT1(γ)=ln(AR1T1(γ))−ln(AR2T1(γ)) (9)
δT2(γ)=ln(AR2T2(γ))−ln(AR1T2(γ)) (10)
where, e.g., AR1T2 represents the amplitude of Receiver 1's voltage signal in response to the signal sent by Transmitter 2. The foregoing bed boundary indicator equations (4)-(8) can be based on the values taken from equations (9) and (10).
Monotonic functions of the phase and/or attenuation can also be incorporated into the bed boundary indicator calculations without departing from the scope and spirit of the claims. One particularly suitable example of a monotonic function is the formation resistivity that the tool is designed to calculate.
In block 425 (
The compensated phase difference (or compensated attenuation measurement) offers a more symmetric response to formation beds than do the individual measurements in response to the first and second transmitters.
In block 430, the compensated measurement is processed to remove the artifacts. In some embodiments, the processing includes adding a function of the bed boundary indicator to suppress the horns, e.g.:
where k is chosen to provide optimal removal of the horns. In some embodiments, k=−½. The compensation can alternatively be done in the resistivity domain:
In block 432, the processed phase difference δP (or the resistivity determined from the processed phase difference, R(δP)) is plotted as a function of tool position. As additional measurements are made, processed, and plotted, the user is provided with a formation resistivity log. In block 434, a check is made to determine if additional measurements are available. If so, the process repeats, beginning with block 405.
The foregoing method has been described as a simple sequence of actions for illustrative purposes. In practice, various method actions may be performed concurrently and independently by different tool components. In some embodiments, transmitters of different frequencies may be used to enable simultaneous measurements using both transmitters.
As mentioned above,
In some system embodiments, the azimuthally-directed resistivity R(γ) logs are used alone or in conjunction with the bed boundary indicator I(γ) to determine distance and direction to nearby bed boundaries. In some cases, it is possible to estimate the formation resistivity on the far side of the boundary.
While the present invention has been described with respect to a limited number of embodiments, those skilled in the art will appreciate numerous modifications and variations therefrom. For example, the bed boundary indicator signal may be derived from a different set of transmitter and/or receiver antennas than the resistivity signal. It is intended that the appended claims cover all such modifications and variations as fall within the true spirit and scope of this present invention.
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/US2007/075455 | 8/8/2007 | WO | 00 | 1/19/2010 |
| Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| WO2008/021868 | 2/21/2008 | WO | A |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2901689 | Barrett | Aug 1959 | A |
| 3014177 | Hungerford et al. | Dec 1961 | A |
| 3187252 | Hungerford | Jun 1965 | A |
| 3510757 | Huston | May 1970 | A |
| 3539911 | Youmans et al. | Nov 1970 | A |
| 3808520 | Runge | Apr 1974 | A |
| 3982176 | Meador | Sep 1976 | A |
| 4302722 | Gianzero | Nov 1981 | A |
| 4319191 | Meador et al. | Mar 1982 | A |
| 4360777 | Segesman | Nov 1982 | A |
| 4536714 | Clark | Aug 1985 | A |
| 4553097 | Clark | Nov 1985 | A |
| 4611173 | Bravenec et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
| 4636731 | Savage et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
| 4651101 | Barber et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
| 4697190 | Oswald | Sep 1987 | A |
| 4700142 | Kuckes | Oct 1987 | A |
| 4780857 | Lyle et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
| 4785247 | Meador et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
| 4791373 | Kuckes | Dec 1988 | A |
| 4808929 | Oldigs | Feb 1989 | A |
| RE32913 | Clark | Apr 1989 | E |
| 4845433 | Kleinberg | Jul 1989 | A |
| 4873488 | Barber et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
| 4899112 | Clark et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
| 4933640 | Kuckes | Jun 1990 | A |
| 4940943 | Bartel et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
| 4945987 | Wittrisch | Aug 1990 | A |
| 4949045 | Clark et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
| 4968940 | Clark et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
| 4980643 | Gianzero et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
| 5089779 | Rorden | Feb 1992 | A |
| 5115198 | Gianzero et al. | May 1992 | A |
| 5200705 | Clark et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5210495 | Hapashey et al. | May 1993 | A |
| 5230386 | Wu et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
| 5241273 | Luling | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5243290 | Safinya | Sep 1993 | A |
| 5260662 | Rorden | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5278507 | Bartel et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5329448 | Rosthal | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5332048 | Underwood et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5389881 | Bittar et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5402068 | Meador et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5442294 | Rorden | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5485089 | Kuckes | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5508616 | Sato et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5530358 | Wisler et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5550473 | Klein | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5563512 | Mumby | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5589775 | Kuckes | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5594343 | Clark et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5656930 | Hagiwara | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5720355 | Lamine et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5725059 | Kuckes et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5757191 | Gianzero | May 1998 | A |
| 5781436 | Forgang et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5854991 | Gupta et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5886526 | Wu | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5892460 | Jerabek et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5923170 | Kuckes | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5999883 | Gupta et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6044325 | Chakravarthy et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6147496 | Strack et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6163155 | Bittar | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6181138 | Hagiwara et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6191586 | Bittar | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6218841 | Wu | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6218842 | Bittar | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6297639 | Clark et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6304086 | Minerbo et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6351127 | Rosthal et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6353321 | Bittar | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6359438 | Bittar | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6373254 | Dion et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6466020 | Kuckes et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
| 6476609 | Bittar | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6538447 | Bittar | Mar 2003 | B2 |
| 6541979 | Omeragic | Apr 2003 | B2 |
| 6566881 | Omeragic et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
| 6573722 | Rosthal et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
| 6614229 | Clark et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6693430 | Rosthal et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6710600 | Kopecki et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6727706 | Gao et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6736222 | Kuckes et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6777940 | Macune | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6810331 | Bittar et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6863127 | Clark et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6885943 | Bittar et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6900640 | Fanini et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6911824 | Bittar | Jun 2005 | B2 |
| 6944546 | Xiao et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6958610 | Gianzero | Oct 2005 | B2 |
| 7019528 | Bittar | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7038455 | Beste et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7046010 | Hu et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7138803 | Bittar | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7202670 | Omeragic et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7227363 | Gianzero et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7265552 | Bittar | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7345487 | Bittar et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7394257 | Martinez et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7427863 | Bittar | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7557579 | Bittar | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7557580 | Bittar | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7657377 | Sinclair et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7659722 | Bittar | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7786733 | Seydoux et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7848887 | Yang et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7948238 | Bittar | May 2011 | B2 |
| 8085049 | Bittar et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8085050 | Bittar et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8222902 | Bittar et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8264228 | Bittar et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8274289 | Bittar et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8305082 | Merchant et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8319498 | Wang | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8433518 | Omeragic et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
| 8487625 | Fang et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
| 20030051914 | Bittar | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030055565 | Omeragic | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030076107 | Fanini et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030229450 | Strickland | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20040059513 | Bittar et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040196047 | Fanini et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20050006090 | Chemali et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050024060 | Bittar | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050083063 | Omeragic et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050134280 | Bittar et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050140373 | Li et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050218898 | Fredette et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20060011385 | Seydoux et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060015256 | Hassan et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060125479 | Chemali et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060244455 | Bittar | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20070278008 | Kuckes et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080018895 | Opsal | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080136419 | Seydoux et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20090015260 | Bittar | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090230968 | Bittar et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20100127708 | Bittar | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20110006773 | Bittar | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110180327 | Bittar et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110221443 | Bittar et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110234230 | Bittar et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110251794 | Bittar et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110309835 | Barber et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20120249149 | Bittar et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20120306500 | Bittar et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 0527089 | Feb 1993 | EP |
| 0814349 | Dec 1997 | EP |
| 0840142 | May 1998 | EP |
| 1155343 | Mar 2011 | EP |
| 2279149 | Dec 1994 | GB |
| 2279697 | Oct 2003 | RU |
| 2305300 | Aug 2007 | RU |
| WO9800733 | Jan 1998 | WO |
| WO0041006 | Jul 2000 | WO |
| WO0155748 | Aug 2001 | WO |
| WO-2007149106 | Dec 2007 | WO |
| WO-20077149106 | Dec 2007 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| “Advisory Action”, dated Apr. 13, 2007, U.S. Appl. No. 11/457,709, “Electromagnetic Wave Resistivity Tool Having a Tilted Antenna for Geosteering Within a Desired Payzone”, filed Jul. 14, 2006. |
| “Advisory Action”, dated Sep. 15, 2005, U.S. Appl. No. 10/616,429, “Electromagnetic Wave Resistivity Tool Having a Tilted Antenna for Geosteering Within a Desired Payzone”, filed Jul. 9, 2003. |
| “Canadian Office Action”, dated Jun. 7, 2005, Application No. 2,415,563, “Electromagnetic Wave Resistivity Tool With a Tilted Antenna”, filed Jul. 10, 2001. |
| “Canadian Office Action”, dated Jan. 23, 2009, Application No. 2,415,563, “Electromagnetic Wave Resistivity Tool With a Tilted Antenna”, filed Jan. 10, 2001. |
| “Canadian Office Action”, dated Jan. 29, 2007, Application No. 2,415,563, “Electromagnetic Wave Resistivity Tool With a Tilted Antenna”, filed Jul. 10, 2001. |
| “Canadian Office Action”, dated Jul. 21, 2003, Appl No. 2,359,371, “Electromagnetic Wave Resistivity Tool Having a Tilted Antenna for Determining the Horizontal and Vertical Resistivities and Relative Dip Angle in Anisotropic Earth Formations”, Jan. 24, 2000. |
| “Canadian Office Action”, dated Nov. 1, 2007, Application No. 2,415,563, “Electromagnetic Wave Resistivity Tool With a Tilted Antenna”, filed Jan. 10, 2001. |
| “European Office Action”, dated Jul. 17, 2006, Appl No. 01962294.3, “Electromagnetic Wave Resistivity Tool Having a Tilted Antenna for Determining the Horizontal and Vertical Resistivities and Relative Dip Angle in Anisotropic Earth Formations”, filed Jul. 10, 2001. |
| “European Office Action”, dated Apr. 29, 2008, Application No. 00908351.0, “Electromagnetic Wave Resistivity Tool Having Tilted Antenna”, filed Jan. 24, 2000. |
| “European Office Action”, dated Jul. 31, 2007, Application No. 00908351.0, “Electromagnetic Wave Resistivity Tool Having Tilted Antenna”, filed Jan. 24, 2000. |
| “European Office Action”, dated Sep. 13, 2007, Application No. 01962294.3, “Electromagnetic Wave Resistivity Tool Having a Tilted Antenna for Determining the Horizontal and Vertical Resistivities and Relative Dip Angle in Anisotropic Earth Formations”, filed Jul. 10, 2001. |
| “European Office Action”, dated Sep. 23, 3008, Application No. 01096 294.3, Electromagnetic wave resistivity tool having a tilted antenna for determining the horizontal and vertical resistivities and relative dip angle in anisotropic earth formations Jul. 10, 2001. |
| “European Supplemental Search Report”, dated Jun. 12, 2003 Application No. 00908351.0, “Electromagnetic Wave Resistivity Tool Having Tilted Antenna”, filed Jan. 24, 2000. |
| “Eurpoean Office Action”, dated Sep. 27, 2005, Application No. 01962294.3, “Electromagnetic Wave Resistivity Tool Having a Tilted Antenna for Determining the Horizontal and Vertical Resistivities and Relative Dip Angle in Anisotropic Earth Formations”, filed Jul. 10, 2001. |
| “PCT International Preliminary Examination Report”, dated Nov. 4, 2002, Application No. PCT/US01/41319 “Electromagnetic Wave Resistivity Tool Having a Tilted Antenna for Geosteering Within a Desired Payzone”, filed Jul. 10, 2001. |
| “PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion”, dated May 15, 2000, Application No. PCT/US00/01693, “Electromagnetic Wave Resistivity Tool Having a Tilted Antenna for Determining the Horizontal and Vertical Resistivities and Relative Dip Angle in Anisotropic Earth Formations”, 01/24/200. |
| “PCT International Search Report”, dated Jan. 31, 2008, Application No. PCT/US07/15806, “Modular Geosteering Tool Assembly”, filed Jul. 11, 2007. |
| “PCT International Search Report”, dated Feb. 5, 2008, Application No. PCT/US07/64221, “Robust Inversion Systems and Methods for Azimuthally Sensitive Resistivity Logging Tools”, filed Mar. 16, 2007. |
| “PCT International Search Report”, dated Feb. 27, 2008, Application No. PCT/US07/75455, “Resistivity Logging with Reduced Dip Artifacts”, filed Aug. 8, 2007. |
| “PCT International Search Report”, dated Apr. 30, 2008, Application No. PCT/US06/62149, Antenna Coupling Component Measurement Tool Having a Rotating Antenna Configuration, filed Dec. 15, 2006. |
| “PCT International Search Report”, dated May 15, 2002, Application No. PCT/US00/01693, Electromagnetic Wave Resistivity Tool Having a Tilted Antenna for Determining the Horizontal and Vertical Resistivities and Relative Dip Angle in Anisotropic Earth Formations, filed Jan. 24, 2000. |
| “PCT International Search Report”, dated May 15, 2008, Application No. PCT/US07/15744, “Method and Apparatus for Building a Tilted Antenna”, filed Jul. 11, 2007. |
| “PCT International Search Report”, dated Sep. 18, 2001, Application No. PCT/US01/41319 “Electromagnetic Wave Resistivity Tool Having a Tilted Antenna for Geosteering Within a Desired Payzone”, filed Jul. 10, 2001. |
| “PCT International Search Report”, dated Sep. 18, 2001, Application No. US01/41319, “Electromagnetic Wave Resistivity Tool Having a Tilted Antenna for Determining the Horizontal and Vertical Resistivities and Relative Dip Angle in Anisotropic Earth Formations”, filed Aug. 6, 2002. |
| “PCT Written Opinion”, dated Aug. 6, 2002, International Application No. PCT/US01/41319, “Electromagnetic Wave Resistivity Tool Having a Tilted Antenna for Geosteering Within a Desired Payzone”, filed Jul. 10, 2001. |
| “US Final Office Action”, dated Jan. 19, 2007, U.S. Appl. No. 11/457,709, “Electromagnetic Wave Resistivity Tool Having a Tilted Antenna for Geosteering Within a Desired Payzone”, filed Jul. 14, 2006. |
| “US Final Office Action”, dated Jun. 6, 2005, U.S. Appl. No. 10/616,429, “Electromagnetic Wave Resistivity Tool Having a Tilted Antenna for Geosteering Within a Desired Payzone”, filed Jul. 9, 2003. |
| “US Final Office Action”, dated Jun. 16, 2004, U.S. Appl. No. 10/255,048, “Electromagnetic Wave Resistivity Tool Having a Tilted Antenna for Determining the Horizontal and Vertical Resistivities and Relative Dip Angle in Anisotropic Earth Formations”, filed Sep. 25, 2002. |
| “US Non-Final Office Action”, dated Feb. 24, 2009, U.S. Appl. No. 12/127,634, “Electromagnetic Wave Resistivity Tool Having a Tilted Antenna for Determining the Horizontal and Vertical Resistivities and Relative Dip Angle in Anisotropic Earth Formations”, filed May 27, 2008. |
| “US Non-Final Office Action”, dated Apr. 26, 2000, U.S. Appl. No. 09/238,832, “Electromagnetic Wave Resistivity Tool Having a Tilted Antenna for Determining the Horizontal and Vertical Resistivities and Relative Dip Angle in Anisotropic Earth Formations”, filed Jan. 28, 1999. |
| “US Non-Final Office Action”, dated Jul. 28, 2003, U.S. Appl. No. 10/255,048, “Electromagnetic Wave Resistivity Tool Having a Tilted Antenna for Determining the Horizontal and Vertical Resistivities and Relative Dip Angle in Anisotropic Earth Formations”, filed Sep. 25, 2002. |
| “US Non-Final Office Action”, dated Sep. 6, 2007, U.S. Appl. No. 11/745,822, Electromagnetic Wave Resistivity Tool Having a Tilted Antenna for Geosteering Within a Desired Payzone:, filed May 8, 2007. |
| “US Non-Final Office Action”, dated Dec. 21, 2005, U.S. Appl. No. 11/198,066, “Electromagnetic Wave Resistivity Tool Having a Tilted Antenna for Determining the Horizontal and Vertical Resistivities and Relative Dip Angle in Anisotropic Earth”, filed Aug. 5, 2005. |
| “US Non-Final Office Action”, dated Aug. 18, 2006, U.S. Appl. No. 11/457,709, “Electromagnetic Wave Resistivity Tool Having a Tilted Antenna for Geosteering Within a Desired Payzone”, filed Jul. 14, 2006. |
| Bell, C. et al., “Navigating and Imaging in Complex Geology With Azimuthal Propagation Resistivity While Drilling”, 2006 SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, SPE 102637, San Antonio, TX, USA, (Sep. 24, 2006),pp. 1-14. |
| Bittar, Michael S., “Processing Resistivity Logs”, U.S. Appl. No. 60/821,721, filed Aug. 8, 2006. |
| Bittar, Michael S., “Tool for Azimuthal Resistivity Measurement and Bed Boundary Detection”, U.S. Appl. No. 60/821,988, filed Aug. 10, 2006. |
| Bittar, Michael S., et al., “A True Multiple Depth of Investigation Electromagnetic Wave Resistivity Sensor: Theory, Experiment, and Prototype Field Test Results”, SPE 22705, 66th Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition of the SPE, Dallas, TX, (Oct. 6, 1991), pp. 1-8, plus 10 pgs of Figures. |
| Bittar, Michael S., et al., “Invasion Profiling with a Multiple Depth of Investigation, Electromagnetic Wave Resistivity Sensor”, SPE 28425, 69th Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition of the SPE, New Orleans, LA, (Sep. 25, 1994), pp. 1-12, plus 11 pgs of Figures. |
| Bittar, Michael S., et al., “The Effects of Rock Anisotropy on MWD Electromagnetic Wave Resistivity Sensors”, The Log Analyst, (Jan. 1996), pp. 20-30. |
| Bittar, Michael S., et al., “The Effects of Rock Anisotropy on MWD Electromagnetic Wave Resistivity Sensors”, SPWLA 35th Annual Logging Symposium, (Jun. 19, 1994), 18 pgs. |
| Bittar, Michael S., “A New Azimuthal Deep-Reading Resistivity Tool for Geosteering and Advanced Formation Evaluation”, 2007 SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, SPE 109971, Anaheim, CA, USA, (Nov. 11, 2007), pp. 1-9. |
| Bittar, Michale S., PCT Application US2007/075455, filed Aug. 8, 2007, Resistivity Logging with Reduced Dip Artifacts. |
| Bonner, S. et al., “A New Generation of Electrode Resistivity Measurements for Formation Evaluation While Drilling”, SPWLA 35th Annual Logging Symposium, (Jun. 19, 1994), pp. 1-19. |
| Clark, Brian et al., “A Dual Depth Resistivity Measurement for Fewd”, SPWLA 29th Annual Logging Symposium, (Jun. 1988), 25 pgs. |
| Clark, Brian et al., “Electromagnetic Propagation Logging While Drilling: Theory and Experiment”, SPE Formation Evaluation, (Sep. 1990), pp. 263-271. |
| Hagiwara, T. “A New Method to Determine Horizontal-Resistivity in Anisotropic Formations Without Prior Knowledge of Relative Dip”, 37th Annual SPWLA Logging Symposium, New Orleans, LA, (Jun. 16, 1996), pp. 1-5, plus 3 pgs of Figures. |
| Li, Qiming et al., “New Directional Electromagnetic Tool for Proactive Geosteering and Accurate Formation Evaluation While Drilling”, SPWLA 46th Annual Logging Symposium, New Orleans, LA, USA, (Jun. 26, 2005), pp. 1-16. |
| Luling, M. et al., “Processing and Modeling 2-MHz Resistivity Tools in Dipping, Laminated, Anisotropic Formations: SPWLA”, SPWLA 35th Annual Logging Symposium, paper QQ, (1994), pp. 1-25. |
| Mack, S. G., et al., “MWD Tool Accurately Measures Four Resistivities”, Oil & Gas Journal, (May 25, 1992), pp. 1-5. |
| Mechetin, V. F., et al., “Temp—A New Dual Electromagnetic and Laterolog Apparatus—Technological Complex”, All-Union Research Logging Institute, Ufa, USSR. Ch. Ostrander, Petro Physics Int'l, Dallas, Texas, USA, 17 pgs. |
| Meyer, W. H., “New Two Frequency Propagation Resistivity Tools”, SPWLA 36th Annual Logging Symposium, (Jun. 26-29, 1995),12 pgs. |
| Rodney, Paul F., et al., “Electromagnetic Wave Resistivity MWD Tool”, SPE Drilling Engineering, (Oct. 1986), pp. 37-346. |
| Bittar, Michael S., et al., “A 3D Borehole Imager and a Dielectric Measurement Tool”, PCT Appl No. US09/65537, filed Nov. 23, 2009, 13 pgs. |
| Bittar, Michael S., et al., “Antenna Coupling Component Measurement Tool Having a Rotating Antenna Configuration”, PCT Appl No. US06/062149, filed Dec. 15, 2006, 26 pgs. |
| Bittar, Michael S., et al., “Antenna Coupling Component Measurement Tool Having a Rotating Antenna Configuration”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/294,557, filed Sep. 25, 2008, 22 pgs. |
| Bittar, Michael S., et al., “EM-Guided Drilling Relative to an Existing Borehole”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/526,552, filed Aug. 10, 2009, 13 pgs. |
| Bittar, Michael S., et al., “Look-Ahead Boundary Detection and Distance Measurement”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/067,582, filed Mar. 20, 2008, 16 pgs. |
| Bittar, Michael S., et al., “Method and Apparatus for Building a Tilted Antenna”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/306,954, filed Dec. 30, 2008, 13 pgs. |
| Bittar, Michael S., et al., “Method and Apparatus Having Antennas Configured to Measure Electrical Anisotropy”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/088,061, filed Mar. 25, 2008, 16 pgs. |
| Bittar, Michael S., et al., “Method and Apparatus with High Resolution Electrode Configuration for Imaging in Oil-Based Muds”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/680,868, filed Mar. 30, 2010, 16 pgs. |
| Bittar, Michael S., et al., “Modular Geosteering Tool Assembly”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/306,267, filed Dec. 23, 2008, 16 pgs. |
| Bittar, Michael S., et al., “Multimodal Geosteering Systems and Methods”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/679,502, filed Mar. 23, 2010, 20 pgs. |
| Bittar, Michael S., et al., “Robust Inversion Systems and Methods for Azimuthally Sensitive Resistivity Logging Tools”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/229,760, filed Nov. 5, 2008, 15 pgs. |
| Bittar, Michael S., et al., “Systems and Methods for Displaying Logging Data”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/295,158, filed Sep. 29, 2008, 15 pgs. |
| Bittar, Michael S., et al., “Systems and Methods Having Radially Offset Antennas for Electromagnetic Resistivity Logging”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/300,876, filed Nov. 14, 2008, 16 pgs. |
| Gianzero, Stanley et al., “Method and Apparatus Having Antennas Configured to Measure Electrical Anisotropy”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/173,528, filed Jun. 17, 2002, 24 pgs. |
| Gianzero, Stanley et al., “Method and Apparatus Having Antennas Configured to Measure Electrical Anisotropy”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/957,415, filed Oct. 1, 2004, 27 pgs. |
| Moran, J. H. et al., “Effects of formation anisotropy on resistivity-logging measurements”, Geophysics, vol. 44, No. 7 (Jul. 1979): p. 1266-1286, 21 Figs., 4 Tables., 21 pgs. |
| “Preliminary Report on Patentability”, dated Jul. 29, 2010, Appl No. PCT/US08/51447, “EM-Guided Drilling Relative to an Existing Borehole”, filed Jan. 18, 2008, 7 pgs. |
| “U.S. Final Office Action”, dated Feb. 22, 2011, U.S. Appl. No. 12/689,435, “Tool for Azimuthal Resistivity Measurement and Bed Boundary Detection” filed Jan. 19, 2010, 10 pgs. |
| “U.S. Non-Final Office Action”, dated Feb. 16, 2011, U.S. Appl. No. 12/294,557, “Antenna Coupling Component Measurement Tool Having a Rotating Antenna Configuration”, filed Sep. 25, 2008, 16 pgs. |
| “U.S. Non-Final Office Action”, dated Sep. 26, 2011, U.S. Appl. No. 12/294,557, “Antenna Coupling Component Measurement Tool Having a Rotating Antenna Configuration”, filed Sep. 25, 2008, 9 pgs. |
| “US Final Office Action”, dated Jul. 7, 2011, U.S. Appl. No. 12/299,760, “Robust Inversion Systems and Methods for Azimuthally Sensitive Resistivity Logging Tools”, filed Nov. 5, 2008, 16 pgs. |
| “US Final Office Action”, dated Nov. 17, 2011, U.S. Appl. No. 12/306,267, “Modular Geosteering Tool Assembly”, filed Dec. 23, 2008, 14 pgs. |
| “US Final Office Action”, dated Dec. 8, 2011, U.S. Appl. No. 12/306,954, “Method and Apparatus for Building a Tilted Antenna”, filed Dec. 30, 2008, 17 pgs. |
| “US Non-Final Office Action”, dated Mar. 13, 2012, U.S. Appl. No. 12/294,557, “Antenna Coupling Component Measurement Tool Having a Rotating Antenna Configuration”, filed Sep. 25, 2008, 6 pgs. |
| “US Non-Final Office Action”, dated Jul. 18, 2011, U.S. Appl. No. 12/306,954, “Method and Apparatus for Building a Tilted Antenna”, filed Dec. 30, 2008, 21 pgs. |
| “US Non-Final Office Action”, dated Nov. 26, 2010, U.S. Appl. No. 12/299,760, “ Robust Inversion Systems and Methods for Azimuthally Sensitive Resistivity Logging Tools”, filed Nov. 5, 2008, 18 pgs. |
| “US Non-Final Office Action”, dated Dec. 23, 2010, U.S. Appl. No. 12/306,267, “Modular Geosteering Tool Assembly”, filed Dec. 23, 2008, 18 pgs. |
| Sato, Motoyuki et al., “Directional Induction Logging Methods”, SPWLA 35th Annual Logging Symposium, (Jun. 19-22, 1994),16 pgs. |
| Kashihara, Koji et al., “Proposal of a Directional Induction Tool”, The First Annual Well Logging Symposium of Japan (Sep. 21-22, 1995), 8 pgs. |
| Lyons, William C., “Standard Handbook of Petroleum & Natural Gas Engineering”, Gulf Publishing Company, Houston, Texas, vol. 1, (1996), pp. 497-498, and 979-980. |
| US Non-Final Office Action, dated Nov. 2, 2012, U.S. Appl. No. 12/526,552, “EM-Guided Drilling Relative to an Existing Borehole”, filed Sep. 26, 2010, 9 pgs. |
| US Non-Final Office Action, dated Jan. 11, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 12/689,435, “Tool for Azimuthal Resistivity Measurement and Bed Boundary Detection”, filed Jan. 19, 2010, 6 pgs. |
| US Final Office Action, dated Mar. 26, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 12/526,552, “EM-Guided Drilling Relative to an Existing Borehole”, filed Sep. 26, 2010, 11 pgs. |
| US Final Office Action, dated Apr. 2, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/095,420, “Electromagnetic Wave Resistivity Tool Having a Tilted Antenna for Determining the Horizontal and Vertical Resistivities and Relative Dip Angle in Anisotropic Earth Formations”, filed Apr. 7, 2011, 32 pgs. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20100127708 A1 | May 2010 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60821721 | Aug 2006 | US |