1. Technical Field
United States of America generally to the field of well logging. More particularly, this disclosure relates to tools and methods for measuring electrical properties of geological formations. Still more specifically, this disclosure relates to tools and methods for measuring the resistivity of a formation at relatively large radial distances from the borehole.
2. Description of the Related Art
Induction and propagation resistivity tools have been used for many years to measure the resistivity of geological formations surrounding a borehole in the presence of borehole fluids that may have invaded the formations Induction logging tools measure the resistivity (or, more accurately, its inverse, conductivity) of the formation by inducing eddy currents in the formations in response to an AC transmitter signal. The eddy currents induce secondary magnetic fields that in turn induce voltages in receiver antennas. Because the magnitudes of the eddy currents depend on formation conductivities, the magnitudes of the received signals thus reflect the formation conductivities
A typical induction tool includes at least two, and preferably three, induction arrays having different spacings between the transmitters and the receivers to provide different depths of investigation. An early example of a dual array tool is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,067,383. A minimal configuration of such a tool includes two arrays having different transmitter-receiver spacings to measure two different depth of investigation: a deep array (ILD) and a medium array (ILM). The deep array is designed to “see” beyond the zone invaded by mud filtrate in order to provide true formation resistivity (Rt) In the prior art, the transmitters and receivers are common to one tool.
To determine the minimum parameters (the invaded zone resistivity, Rxo, the resistivity of the uninvaded zone, Rt, and the radius of invasion, r1) of a formation invaded by drilling fluids, at least three measurements at different depths of investigation are required. Therefore, a third shallow measurement (a shallow measurement) has been provided by a focused electrode array placed on the tool. One such tool is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,329,889. The shallow measurement, together with the medium (ILM) and deep (ILD) measurements provided by the induction arrays, provide sufficient data to solve for formation resistivities in a formation having a simple invasion profile.
However, such a tool may not provide sufficient data for the determination of formation properties such as anisotropy or when the invasion profile is complex. Therefore, multi-array tools having non-axially aligned antennas have been introduced for the determination of formation resistivity in formations with mote complex invasion profiles Examples of multi-array tools include those disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,157,605. The multiple arrays, having fixed spacings between the transmitter and the receiver, can provide measurements at fixed depths of investigation. Therefore, when mud invasion occurs to different extents (radii) in different formation layers, sufficient data may still be provided to solve for the true formation resistivity
A significant drawback to prior art tools is the fixed spacing between transmitters and receivers within a single tool, limiting the measurements to fixed depths of investigation.
A wireline tool string used in a wellbore to determine formation properties is disclosed which comprises one or mote transmitter tools disposed within the tool string, each transmitter tool having three linearly independent coils; a receiver tool disposed within the tool string, wherein the receiver tool has three linearly independent coils; and a tool string component disposed between the one or more transmitter tools and the receiver tool; wherein the one or more transmitter tools are selectably spatially separated from the receiver tool along the tool string to provide a desired depth of investigation and measurements made using the one or more transmitter tools and receiver tool are used to determine formation properties
Other advantages and features will be apparent from the following detailed description when read in conjunction with the attached drawings.
For a more complete understanding of the disclosed methods and apparatuses, reference should be made to the embodiment illustrated in greater detail on the accompanying drawings, wherein:
It should be understood that the drawings are not necessarily to scale and that the disclosed embodiments are sometimes illustrated diagrammatically and in partial views In certain instances, details which are not necessary for an understanding of the disclosed method and apparatus or which render other details difficult to perceive may have been omitted It should be understood that this disclosure is not limited to the particular embodiments illustrated herein.
The present invention preferably uses relatively long spacing(s) between a receiver tool 16 and one or more transmitter tools. Three exemplary transmitter tools 17, 18, and 19 are shown in
The spacing between transmitter tool 17 and receiver tool 16, for example, can be of any desired length since transmitter tool 17 and receiver tool 16 are separate tools. Because the depth of investigation of the measurement is proportional to the spacing, longer spacings allow for deeper depths of investigation. An operator may decide a priori what depth of investigation is desired, and the transmitter-receiver spacing can be set accordingly. The spacing may be roughly equal to the depth of investigation, or may be derived from a mote detailed calculation. Thus, other tools may be placed in tool string 12 between transmitter tool 17 and receiver tool 16, or alternatively, blank pipe can be used to provide the desired spacing
To obtain sufficient information to characterize the formation properties, the antennas in transmitter tool 17 and receiver tool 16 are preferably triaxial coils A triaxial coil 24 (
As the depth of investigation is increased, the signal intensity is attenuated, resulting in a poorer signal-to-noise ratio. This can be compensated for, to some extent, by using a lower frequency. The lower frequency also helps to provide a deeper depth of investigation, for reasons discussed below Thus, multi-frequency antennas may be used to allow flexibility in choosing the depth of investigation. In addition, the signal-to-noise ratio can be improved by increasing the magnetic moment of the antenna. This can be done, for example, by placing multiple triaxial coils 24 in close proximity to each other within each transmitter tool 17 or receiver tool 16. Different coils of say, transmitter tool 17, can be selectively energized to multiply the magnetic moment. At large depths of investigation, the multiple coils will “appear” to be a single coil with enhanced moment.
With respect to
By the principle of reciprocity, receiver tools 17′, 18′, 19′ (shown in phantom in
The transmitters tools 17, 18, 19 may be deployed to provide either a two-coil response or a propagation-type response. In the latter configuration, two transmitter tools (say, 17, 18 and 18, 19, for example) are used and their responses combined to yield attenuation and phase shift. Transmitter tools 17, 18, 19 can operate at multiple frequencies such as 0.5, 2, 5, 10, 20, and 50 kHz with corresponding magnetic moments near 3.3, 6.6, and 10 Am2. In the case of a two-coil measurement, transmitter tools 17, 18 and 19 need to be synchronized with receiver tool 16 to measure a trans-impedance tensor. Transmitter tools 17, 18, 19 can be calibrated using a triaxial receiver coil mounted on each transmitter tool Receiver tool 16 can be calibrated using a tilted test loop to excite receiver tool 16 and then comparing the measured response to a modeled response.
In the embodiment of
As stated above, receiver tool 16 and transmitter tools 17, 18, 19 must be synchronized such that the voltage sensed by receiver tool 16 is measured with respect to the drive current in transmitter tools 17, 18, 19. The phase angle between the transmitter drive current and the receiver voltage must be measured extremely accurately. This can be achieved, for example, by sending a timing signal through a wire from each transmitter tool 17, 18 and 19 to receiver tool 16.
As described above, transmitter tools 17, 18, 19 are placed in tool string 12 at selected distances from receiver tool 16. Those distances are input into processing software. The input and the measured data can be processed downhole, but are preferably delivered to processing station 13 via wireline 11 and processed at the surface Alternatively, the information may be recorded and sent to a computing center for processing. The processing produces three-dimensional resistivity images of the formation surrounding the borehole. The more transmitter-receiver spacings measured, the more detailed the 3-D image will be. Those images can be used for formation evaluation.
To confirm the present invention can be used at the larger spacings, the signal that would be received when the invention is operated in a homogeneous formation was modeled. Typical voltage response curves for an axial 2-coil tool versus formation conductivity at drive frequencies of 2, 5, 10, 20 and 50 kHz are shown in
The invention's response was also modeled using a three-bed formation in which the invention is operating in a vertical borehole, as shown in
The invention's response was further modeled using a three-bed formation in which the invention is operating in a horizontal borehole, as shown in
A tool string 12 can be placed in one wellbore while one or more transmitter tools are placed in a nearby wellbore such that the receiver tool 16 of tool string 12 interacts with the transmitter tools in the other wellbore. As another alternative, surface to borehole measurements may be made by employing a transmitter on the surface and one or more receiver tools in the wellbore.
While only certain embodiments have been set forth, alternatives and modifications will be apparent from the above description to those skilled in the art. These and other alternatives ate considered equivalents and within the scope of this disclosure and the appended claims.
This is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 11/160,533 filed on Jun. 28, 2005, which claims priority under 35 U.S. C. §119(e) to Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/587,689 filed on Jul. 14, 2004
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3067383 | Tanguy | Dec 1962 | A |
3329889 | Tanguy | Jul 1967 | A |
4209747 | Huchital | Jun 1980 | A |
4511843 | Thoraval | Apr 1985 | A |
4739325 | MacLeod | Apr 1988 | A |
5117927 | Askew | Jun 1992 | A |
5157605 | Chandler et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5661402 | Chesnutt et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5955884 | Payton et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6047240 | Barber et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6057784 | Schaaf et al. | May 2000 | A |
6188222 | Seydoux et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6294917 | Nichols | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6480000 | Kong et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6525540 | Kong et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6538447 | Bittar | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6591673 | Liu | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6594584 | Omeragic et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6690170 | Homan et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6969994 | Minerbo et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7023213 | Nichols | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7091722 | Homan et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7091877 | Barber et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7093672 | Seydoux et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
20060011385 | Seydoux et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070137854 A1 | Jun 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60587689 | Jul 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11160533 | Jun 2005 | US |
Child | 11612881 | US |