1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates generally to a circuit for and method of processing an audio frequency signal and more particularly relates to hearing aid signal processing.
2. Description of the Prior Art
It is well known in the art to utilize electronic devices to assist the hearing impaired. The earliest such instruments consisted of a microphone coupled to an electronic amplifier which was in turn coupled to an earphone. Quite apart from the technical difficulties experienced, these early hearing aids were sufficiently large and intrusive that the hearing impaired could be readily identified providing a degree of self-consciousness.
The coming of electronic miniaturization and sub-miniaturization permitted the manufacture of hearing aid systems which are totally inserted in the outer auditory canal during use. The resulting systems provide substantially greater hearing assistance along with a much more pleasing (and almost unnoticeable) aesthetic appearance. A modern, totally in-the-ear device has a microphone acoustically coupled to the ambient with all of the electronics packaged in a form factor which is accommodated by the outer ear of the patient. A transducer is electronically coupled to the output stage of the hearing aid circuit and acoustically coupled to the distal portion of the outer auditory canal.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,689,818, issued to Ammitzboll on Aug. 25, 1987, purports to describe the circuitry and operation of the Siemens Custom In-The-Ear Hearing Aid 007, sold by Siemens Hearing Instruments, Inc. This is a typical example of a totally in-the-ear device.
A key problem in the miniaturization process is reducing the size of the battery. Whereas substantial progress has been made in battery development, much credit is also appropriately given to designers of low power consumption electronic circuitry. Current state of the art instruments utilize class D output stages which are particularly helpful in reducing overall power consumption. However, as is known to those of skill in the art, the class D output stage tends to have a frequency response curve whose peak gain frequency is not easily modified to accommodate differences in patient pathologies. Yet, abnormalities in middle ear functioning are known to shift the peak in the unaided ear canal resonance to a lower frequency.
The present invention overcomes the disadvantages of the prior art by providing a technique for utilizing the power saving characteristics of a class D output stage within a system which has sufficient adjustability in frequency response peak gain frequency to accommodate various differences in patient-to-patient middle ear pathology. Specifically, the present invention employs an active low-pass filter which has adjustable overshoot. This filter is coupled through a buffering stage to the class D output amplifier. By adjusting the degree of overshoot, the level of the peak in the frequency response of the entire system is readily adjustable within a given therapeutic range even though the class D output amplifier is inherently difficult to tune.
When practicing the present invention, the resonance curve of the outer auditory canal of the patient is determined utilizing existing techniques. This curve is relatively consistent for patients having normal ear physiology. However, various middle ear pathologies often lower the frequency of the basic resonance producing a unique frequency response curve for a given patient.
In accordance with the present invention, the overshoot of the low pass filter stage is adjusted such that the frequency response curve of the hearing aid system most nearly matches the resonance curve of the patient's outer auditory canal. Thus, when the hearing aid is properly inserted, the resulting interface between the hearing assistance device and the patient's middle ear are very closely correlated.
As a result of this frequency response match, the patient is provided with a smooth insertion frequency response without extra amplification at the frequency of the ear canal resonance. The advantages of lower power consumption, lessened probability of acoustic feedback, and improved auditory acuity are the direct products of practicing the present invention.
In a preferred mode of practicing the present invention and not to be deemed to be limiting of the scope of the invention, the output of the preamp or signal processing stage is applied to a standard R-C circuit. The resulting signal is coupled through a variable resistor to an amplifying stage, wherein the resistance variability adjusts the overshoot. The active low pass filter output is capacitively coupled to a buffering stage employing a normal operational amplifier. The output of the buffering stage is applied directly to the class D output amplifier.
Other objects of the present invention and many of the attendant advantages of the present invention will be readily appreciated as the same becomes better understood by reference to the following detailed description when considered in connection with the accompanying drawings, in which like reference numerals designate like parts throughout the figures thereof and wherein:
The present invention is described in accordance with several preferred embodiments which are to be viewed as illustrative without being limiting. In the preferred mode, the present invention is employed as a totally within the ear hearing aid system having a class D output stage.
In a patient having normal middle ear physiology, the ear canal can be thought of as an open organ pipe having a primary resonance at about 2.8 kilohertz and a relatively flat response from about 300 hertz to about 3 kilohertz. As shown in diagram 10, gain curve 16 for the hearing aid is deliberately designed to match this response to replace the peak in gain lost when the ear canal is occluded by an ear mold. Gain peak 18 occurs at about 2.8 kilohertz.
As explained above, the ear canal can be thought of as an open organ pipe having a primary resonance at about 2.8 kilohertz and a relatively flat response from about 300 hertz to about 3 kilohertz. As shown in diagram 11, REUR curve 15 shows the resonance curve for the typical patient. Resonance peak occurs at about 2.8 kilohertz.
For a hearing impaired patient having a totally in-the-ear hearing aid device, the outer auditory canal is totally or partially blocked thus removing the natural resonance at resonance peak 18. However, it is typical that the class D amplifiers employed in current devices deliberately have a corresponding response peak at about 2.8 kilohertz (see also
A number of various problems can cause this lowering of the resonance of the outer auditory canal including punctured ear drum, abnormal middle ear bone physiology, etc. If a standard totally in-the-ear hearing aid device, having a class D output amplifier, is utilized in the patient of resonance curve 22, there will be a substantial mismatch in the frequency response curve of the hearing aid device and that of the open ear of the patient.
This mismatch renders most hearing aids incapable of providing enough amplification at the abnormally low resonant peak of frequency of the patient. The result is under-amplification at this frequency and a jagged insertion gain frequency response.
Microphone 28 is a standard hearing aid microphone acoustically coupled to the ambient. The signal produced by microphone 28 is coupled through standard preamplifier 29 and standard signal processing stage 31 to the low pass filter consisting of resistor 30 and capacitor 32. Variable resistor 38 couples the filtered signal to operational amplifier 42 and forms another pole of the low pass filter with capacitor 40. In this way, variable resistor 38 controls the amplification gain of the overshoot and the peak frequency of the low pass filter. Thus, variable resistor 38 controls frequency of peak gain in the frequency response curve of the entire hearing aid system.
The processed audio frequency signal is capacitively coupled via capacitor 44 to operational amplifier 50 via resistor 46. Resistor 48 provides feedback for operational amplifier 50 which functions as a buffering stage between the active low pass filter stage and the class D output amplifier.
The output of operational amplifier 50 is capacitively coupled via capacitor 52 to standard class D output amplifier 54.
Having thus described the preferred embodiments of the present invention, those of skill in the art will be readily able to adapt the teachings found herein to yet other embodiments within the scope of the claims hereto attached.
It will be understood that this disclosure, in many respects, is only illustrative. Changes may be made in details, particularly in matters of shape, size, material, and arrangement of parts without exceeding the scope of the invention. Accordingly, the scope of the invention is as defined in the language of the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2112569 | Lybarger | Mar 1938 | A |
2308931 | Penn | Jan 1943 | A |
3527901 | Geib | Sep 1970 | A |
4366349 | Adelman | Dec 1982 | A |
4396806 | Anderson | Aug 1983 | A |
4419544 | Adelman | Dec 1983 | A |
4471490 | Bellafiore | Sep 1984 | A |
4637402 | Adelman | Jan 1987 | A |
4689819 | Killion | Aug 1987 | A |
4882762 | Waldhauer | Nov 1989 | A |
5044373 | Northeved et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5243662 | Sogn et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5263089 | Ribic | Nov 1993 | A |
5390254 | Adelman | Feb 1995 | A |
5406633 | Miller et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5434924 | Jampolsky | Jul 1995 | A |
5502769 | Gilbertson | Mar 1996 | A |
5553152 | Newton | Sep 1996 | A |
5581747 | Anderson | Dec 1996 | A |
5659621 | Newton | Aug 1997 | A |
5710820 | Martin et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5757933 | Preves et al. | May 1998 | A |
5822442 | Agnew et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5825631 | Prchal | Oct 1998 | A |
5835611 | Kaiser et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5852668 | Ishige et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5862238 | Agnew et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
6041129 | Adelman | Mar 2000 | A |
6236731 | Brennan et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6240192 | Brennan et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6347148 | Brennan et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6366863 | Bye et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6389142 | Hagen et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6449662 | Armitage | Sep 2002 | B1 |
20010007050 | Adelman | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20020076073 | Taenzer et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO-0021332 | Apr 2000 | WO |