The invention relates to a resonator for reducing airborne noise having at least a first ring-shaped chamber arranged between an inlet piece and an outlet piece, and having an inner tube or inner tube pieces arranged between the inlet piece and the outlet piece, with wall apertures being provided as a connection to the adjacent ring-shaped chamber.
DE 603 01 437 T2 discloses a resonator for reducing airborne noise with ring-shaped chambers arranged between an inlet piece and an outlet piece. An inner pipe serving as a conduit is arranged between the inlet piece and outlet piece. The inner tube has wall apertures serving as a connection to the adjacent ring-shaped chambers. The adjacent ring-shaped chambers are each separated from one another by means of a constriction of an outer pipe, which delimits the ring-shaped chambers in a radial outward direction.
With regard to the known resonator, it is disadvantageous that a passage, which ensures a supply flow from one chamber to the next, is arranged between the constriction and the inner tube. This arrangement is intended to avoid complicated seals which are replaced by a leakage flow.
Furthermore, DE 199 56 172 B4 discloses a resonator for reducing airborne noise by means of ring-shaped chambers arranged between an inlet piece and an outlet piece. Inner tube pieces are arranged as a conduit between the inlet piece and the outlet piece. The conduit is connected to the ring-shaped chambers by way of circumferential slits formed between the ends of inner tube pieces.
With regard to this known resonator, which has basically proved reliable, it is disadvantageous that additional adjustment options are desirable to improve the frequency-dependent silencing values, without requiring complicated inner seals.
The purpose of the present invention is to improve the known resonators. In particular, by means of a simple design, it is intended to improve the silencing values and their adjustment options while avoiding complicated seals as well as undesired leakage flows.
This problem is solved in connection with the features of the preamble of claim 1 in that the first ring-shaped chamber is subdivided by at least one radially encircling dividing rib into at least two sub-chambers and in that the dividing rib has a free end which forms, toward the adjacent wall in a radial direction, an encircling annular space to accommodate an air layer that co-resonates in steady-state fashion.
The arrangement of a radially encircling dividing rib makes it relatively easy to divide the ring-shaped chamber into two sub-chambers. The fact that the dividing rib has a free end that forms, toward the adjacent wall, an encircling annular space to accommodate an air layer that co-resonates in steady-state fashion makes it possible to dispense with relatively complicated seals, on the one hand, while on the other hand avoiding leakage flows, since the air layer accommodated by the annular space remains stationary at that point and only co-resonates. The mass inertia of the air layer therefore prevents leakage flows between the sub-chambers via the dividing rib. This improves the silencing values, on the one hand, while providing more adjustment options, on the other.
According to a preferred embodiment of the invention, the dividing rib is designed as an encircling double rib, where the double rib delimits a circumferential gap, and said gap is open to the circumferential annular space (for the purposes of this application, “double rib” also refers to multiple ribs with multiple gaps). In conjunction with the circumferential annular space, the circumferential gap creates a type of labyrinthine seal, which encourages the air layer that is co-resonating in steady-state fashion to remain in place.
According to another preferred embodiment of the invention, the inner tube or inner tube piece delimiting the sub-chambers has wall apertures forming a connection to the adjacent sub-chamber. In this way, each of the two sub-chambers is connected to the inflow via the inlet piece and the inner tube.
At least one of the sub-chambers may have a circumferential control fin. In the radial direction, the control fin is the same height as or lower than the dividing rib. By means of the same or a lower height of the control fins and the lack of a gap, it is ensured that the control fins do not actually function as a seal but rather enable a controlled build-up of pressure resonance. This further augments the adjustment options. In particular, by introducing control or dummy fins, it is possible to obtain an additional stable base resonance and higher-frequency reactions, which enable additional design adjustments with a larger silencing range.
According to one embodiment, the height of the annular space in the radial direction between the free end of the dividing rib and the adjacent wall is between 0.3 and 2 mm. Furthermore, it is preferable for the height of the annular space to be between 0.5 and 1.5 mm. A height of 1 mm for the annular space has proved especially effective.
The dividing rib may be arranged on the inner tube or the inner tube piece, with the wall adjacent to the free end of the dividing rib being formed by the outer wall of the first ring chamber, said wall facing away from the inner tube or tube piece. In principle, the dividing rib can however also be arranged on the outer wall of the first ring-shaped chamber, with the wall adjacent to the free end of the dividing rib being formed by the inner tube or the first inner tube piece.
The inlet piece may be attached to a pot-like first jacket-sheath, the cylindrical wall of which forms the outer wall of the first ring-shaped chamber and whose ring-shaped side wall forms a connection to the inlet piece while simultaneously forming the lateral delimitation of the first ring-shaped chamber toward the inlet piece.
The outlet piece may be formed by an extension of the inner tube, with the outlet piece having, in the direction of the inlet piece, a ring-shaped lateral wall that forms the lateral delimitation of the first ring-shaped chamber towards the outlet piece.
The end of the first inner tube piece facing away from the inlet piece may have a ring-shaped lateral wall that forms the lateral delimitation of the first ring-shaped chamber toward the outlet piece and via which the first inner tube piece is connected with the first jacket-sheath. The outlet piece transitions into the second inner tube piece, and the outlet piece penetrates the base of a pot-shaped second jacket-sheath, the cylindrical wall of which, at its end facing toward the first jacket-sheath, is connected to the ring-shaped lateral wall that also forms a first lateral wall for a second ring-shaped chamber, the second lateral wall of which is formed by the base of the pot-shaped second jacket-sheath.
Further features and advantages of the invention result from the following specific description and the drawings.
A resonator 1 to reduce airborne noise essentially consists of a first ring-shaped chamber 2, an inner tube 3 or inner tube pieces 4, 5.
The first ring-shaped chamber 2 is arranged between an inlet piece 6 and an outlet piece 7. As seen in
In the exemplary embodiment seen in
In the exemplary embodiment seen in
The dividing rib 13 is designed as a circumferential double rib that delimits a circumferential gap 17. The gap 17 is open in the radial direction toward the annular space 16. The inner tube 3 that delimits the sub-chambers 14, 15 has wall apertures 18 forming a connection to the first sub-chamber 14 and wall apertures 19 forming a connection to the second sub-chamber 15. In the exemplary embodiment shown in
According to the exemplary embodiment shown in
As shown in the exemplary embodiment depicted in
As shown in the exemplary embodiment in
The first sub-chamber 14′ has wall apertures 28 in the first inner tube piece. The second sub-chamber 15′ has wall apertures 29 between the control fins 22′ and 23′ and has wall apertures 30 between the control fin 23′ and the lateral wall 12′.
The resonator 1″ in the exemplary embodiment shown in
As shown in the exemplary embodiment in
The embodiments discussed in the specific description and shown in the figures obviously represent merely illustrative embodiments of the present invention. For example, the inlet and outlet, i.e. the flow direction, can be reversed. In addition to being applied to cylindrical cross-sections, the functional principle can also be used in connection with other cross-sectional shapes. In the light of the present disclosure a person skilled in the art has a broad spectrum of optional variations available.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2014 115 898 | Oct 2014 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2015/075334 | 10/30/2015 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2016/066836 | 5/6/2016 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1821688 | Bourne | Sep 1931 | A |
2323955 | Wilson | Jul 1943 | A |
3092206 | Moreau | Jun 1963 | A |
3113635 | Allen | Dec 1963 | A |
4027740 | Martin | Jun 1977 | A |
4055231 | Martinez | Oct 1977 | A |
4244442 | Scarton | Jan 1981 | A |
4346781 | Ingard | Aug 1982 | A |
4874062 | Yanagida | Oct 1989 | A |
6508331 | Stuart | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6983820 | Boast | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7367424 | Brown | May 2008 | B2 |
7810609 | Sikes | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7934581 | Kim | May 2011 | B2 |
8256571 | Butler | Sep 2012 | B1 |
8323556 | Khami | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8408357 | Cheung | Apr 2013 | B2 |
9010485 | Bornemann | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9175648 | Dobrin | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9625077 | Barbolini | Apr 2017 | B2 |
20030173146 | Wolf et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20140196977 | Hartmann | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20180223779 | Buck | Aug 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1637269 | Jul 2005 | CN |
102575538 | Jul 2012 | CN |
203335225 | Dec 2013 | CN |
199 56 172 | May 2001 | DE |
10 2008 015 353 | Sep 2009 | DE |
10 2008 032 491 | Jan 2010 | DE |
2 256 330 | Dec 2010 | DE |
2 757 235 | Jul 2014 | EP |
9-177627 | Jul 1997 | JP |
WO-2015055310 | Apr 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
English Translation of International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Feb. 24, 2017. |
International Search Report dated Feb. 15, 2016. |
Chinese Office Action dated Aug. 31, 2018. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170316771 A1 | Nov 2017 | US |