The present disclosure relates generally to wireless multi-carrier communications and more particularly to resource allocation in wireless multi-carrier communication systems having communication terminals utilizing both frequency selective (FS) and frequency non-selective (FNS) scheduling techniques, devices and methods.
Frequency-Selective (FS) techniques have the potential for significantly increasing performance in wireless multi-carrier communication systems. Such techniques are expected to be included in the currently developing Third Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) Evolved—(Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (UTRA) standards. FS techniques improve system performance based on knowledge of the frequency profile of the channel, for example, by changing the modulation and coding scheme with frequency. In contrast, Frequency Non-Selective (FNS) techniques use a frequency-averaged channel quality information report.
FS techniques are generally not applicable to all user equipment (UE) in the network. For example, it is difficult to track time variations of the channel for user equipment moving at relatively high velocities. Some system base stations may apply FS techniques to only subsets of users to limit signaling overhead. UE in or near flat-fading conditions also may not require FS techniques because of the nature of the channel. FS techniques may also not be required for UE employing multiple-antenna techniques. FS and FNS users will therefore likely co-exist in many wireless communication systems. Therefore, there is a need for a resource assignment scheme and associated signaling that can accommodate both FS and FNS users.
The various aspects, features and advantages of the disclosure will become more fully apparent to those having ordinary skill in the art upon careful consideration of the following Detailed Description thereof with the accompanying drawings described below. The drawings may have been simplified for clarity and are not necessarily drawn to scale.
In
As suggested in the Background discussion above, Frequency Selective (FS) and Frequency Non-Selective (FNS) users will likely co-exist in many wireless communication systems. Exemplary systems include but are not limited to systems compliant with the currently developing 3GPP Evolved-UTRA standards and other Orthogonal Frequency-Division Multiplexed (OFDM) wireless communication systems. In these and other wireless communication systems supporting both FS and FNS users, the scheduling entity must generally allocate resources to the system users, typically in the form of mobile terminals or UEs. Several resource allocation schemes are discussed further below.
In one embodiment, resources are assigned to frequency selective (FS) and frequency non-selective (FNS) users, for example, in an OFDM or other wireless communication system having FS and FNS users. In one embodiment, a first frequency resource is assigned to at least one FS user during one time interval, and a second frequency resource, including at least two non-contiguous sub-carriers, is assigned to at least one FNS user during the same time interval during which the FS assignment is made. In one embodiment, the first and second frequency resources are part of a common frequency channel.
The first frequency resource assigned to each FS user includes at least two near contiguous sub-carriers. In one embodiment, near contiguous sub-carriers are adjacent or separated by not more than one sub-carrier. More generally the first frequency resource may include additional sub-carriers, though these additional sub-carriers need not necessarily be near contiguous. The second frequency resource assigned to each FNS user includes at least two non-contiguous sub-carriers. In some embodiments, the second frequency resource may also include additional sub-carriers that are not necessarily non-contiguous. In another embodiment, the at least two non-contiguous sub-carriers of the second frequency resource assigned to each FNS user are separated by not less than one quarter of the common frequency channel.
The base station performs channel coding and interleaving data for each FNS user over the correspondingly assigned second frequency resources. Channel coding and interleaving for the FS user may be on a per-sub-channel basis. Coding and interleaving for the FS user may be on a per-sub-channel basis, or across multiple sub-channels assigned to a user. For example, if the assigned sub-channels for a FS user all have similar channel quality they may all be assigned the same modulation and coding rate, and may also be channel coded and interleaved together to form a larger codeword. In all cases, a maximum codeword size may be imposed, and in some cases multiple codewords may be needed to protect either a FS or a FNS user.
In
In one resource assignment scheme, all sub-channels are assigned to different FS users, and one or more sub-carriers are punctured from each sub-channel for assignment to one or more FNS users. In
In the resource allocation scheme of
In
The control channel structure for assigning sub-channels to FS and FNS users generally comprises a FS user assignment block for identifying one or more FS users and a FNS user assignment block for identifying one or more FNS users and one or more sub-channels assigned thereto. The FNS user assignment block also includes a first unique sub-channel assigned to each FNS user, a number of unique sub-channels assigned to each FNS user, and a sub-channel skip factor for each FNS user. In one embodiment, each sub-channel assigned to each FNS user includes at least one sub-carrier, wherein the sub-channels assigned to each FNS user are selected from a group of sub-channels not assigned to FS users.
The FS user assignment block and the FNS user assignment block occupy a common time interval, for example, in the control/pilot symbol 220 illustrated in
In an alternative embodiment, the FNS user assignment block includes a first unique sub-carrier assigned to each FNS user, a number of unique sub-carriers assigned to each FNS user, and a sub-carrier skip factor for each FNS user.
In one embodiment, the control channel structure includes a first unique list including at least one sub-channel assigned to each FS user, wherein each sub-channel assigned to each FS user includes at least two near-contiguous sub-carriers as discussed above. In another embodiment, the control channel structure includes a field identifying FS resources. The field may be in the form of a bit map that identifies FS and FNS resources wherein “1” or “0” may be used to indicate whether a particular resource is assigned to FS or FNS users. In another embodiment, the control channel structure includes a field indicating whether both FS and FNS users have been allocated resources. For example, a “1” bit at the beginning of the frame may be used to indicate that assignments are mixed. In other embodiments, the bit may be used to indicate that the assignments all are either for all FN or FNS users. The FS and FNS user assignment blocks, whether in the form of a bit map or tree structure, and any other data, including CRC, tail bits, etc. are generally mapped to the control channel using means and schemes well known to those having ordinary skill in the art.
In one embodiment, the control channel structure is generated for assigning sub-channels to FS and FNS users by assigning each FS user at least one unique sub-channel from a group of sub-channels before assigning sub-channels to any FNS users, and then assigning each FNS user a first unique sub-channel, a number of unique sub-channels, and a sub-channel skip factor, wherein the sub-channels assigned to each FNS user are selected from a group of sub-channels remaining after the assignment of sub-channels to the FS users. In some embodiments, the group of sub-channels remaining after the assignment of sub-channels to FS users is re-numbered, and each FNS user is assigned the first unique sub-channel, the number of unique sub-channels, and the sub-channel skip factor based on the re-numbered sub-channels. In frequency hoping applications wherein one of the FNS users is a frequency hopping user, each frequency hopping FNS user is assigned a frequency hopping factor, wherein the frequency hopping factor is based on the re-numbered sub-channels.
While the present disclosure and the best modes thereof have been described in a manner establishing possession by the inventors and enabling those of ordinary skill in the art to make and use the same, it will be understood and appreciated that there are many equivalents to the exemplary embodiments disclosed herein and that modifications and variations may be made thereto without departing from the scope and spirit of the inventions, which are to be limited not by the exemplary embodiments but by the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6064662 | Gitlin et al. | May 2000 | A |
6567416 | Chuah | May 2003 | B1 |
6598200 | Greenwood et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
20020118666 | Stanwood et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020119781 | Li et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020172184 | Kim et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020178449 | Yamamoto et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030003920 | Sebastian | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030189918 | Das et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040095907 | Agee et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040127223 | Li et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040258134 | Cho et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050085236 | Gerlach et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050111397 | Attar et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050111406 | Pasanen et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050232181 | Park et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050254461 | Shin et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060013325 | Agrawal et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060039274 | Park et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060203707 | Lee et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060245384 | Talukdar et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070058595 | Classon et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070097887 | Kim et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070140102 | Oh et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070165694 | Parizhsky et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070211657 | McBeath et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070214400 | Smith et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080049690 | Kuchibhotla et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080084845 | Kuchibhotla et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20090268695 | Zhao et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090316614 | Kim et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1610333 | Apr 2005 | CN |
1526674 | Apr 2005 | EP |
11355195 | Dec 1999 | JP |
2005130491 | May 2005 | JP |
2006505219 | Feb 2006 | JP |
0241520 | May 2002 | WO |
0249305 | Jun 2002 | WO |
2004042954 | May 2004 | WO |
2004095851 | Nov 2004 | WO |
2004100569 | Nov 2004 | WO |
2005109705 | Nov 2005 | WO |
2006039812 | Apr 2006 | WO |
2006065069 | Jun 2006 | WO |
2006102746 | Oct 2006 | WO |
2006105004 | Oct 2006 | WO |
2006105005 | Oct 2006 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070110104 A1 | May 2007 | US |