This invention relates to sleep modes for digital computers and, more particularly, to a novel method and apparatus for reducing battery power drain in portable computers during periods in which the computer is left idle for a time, even momentarily, while restoring CPU operation instantaneously once processing is to resume.
Portable digital computers rely on rechargeable DC batteries to provide the electrical power necessary for operation. When the computer is powered on for processing operation, but allowed to remain idle, the battery continues nonetheless to supply current to all the components of the computer, including the central processing unit (CPU), memory, the chipset (e.g. the Southbridge) and the display of the computer. If the user fails to turn off the computer, the battery continues to supply full current and, eventually, becomes drained of the stored electrical power. The foregoing action leads to more frequent recharging of the battery, and reduces the utility and usability of the computer system.
To reduce battery drain under such circumstances, a power management technique was previously introduced for portable computers, called the “sleep” mode. Typically, portable computers based on the INTEL X86 CPU and associated chip set, referred to as “PC's”, include multiple sleep modes (e.g. states of sleep mode). The multiple sleep modes enable the portable computer, when left idle, to selectively power down the components and devices of the computer in stages, although the main power remains on. With the computer spending an increasing amount of time idling, the computer progresses through increasingly deeper and deeper stages of sleep mode (and hence, greater reductions in power consumption). One of the deepest of those modes is characterized by all of the devices, including the CPU, but excepting the main memory (RAM) and the Southbridge chip, being powered down. This latter mode is typically referred to as “Suspend to RAM” (“STR”) or as “Power-on-Suspend” (“POS”) or like terms. In the STR condition power consumption is dramatically reduced and offers the greatest power reduction short of that power reduction obtained by turning off every component of the computer, the latter being referred to as “suspend to disk”, essentially completely shutting down the computer.
The sleep modes in the PC are defined and controlled by the operating system software, such as familiar Windows 9X, Unix, Linux and the like, in conjunction with the system BIOS of the computer. When in STR, the Southbridge portion of the chip set, which is responsible for power management of the PC, continues to monitor the keyboard and mouse (and/or resume key) of the PC for any user activity, signifying an end to the computer idle condition.
When the user later returns to perform computing and observes the computer is in a sleep mode, the user operates a “resume” key (or any key of the keyboard) or the like. That action initiates a chain of events in the computer, transparent to the user, that restores full power to the CPU; and the computer recovers quickly. Return from the upper stages of the sleep mode recovers more quickly than recovery from the STR stage, the deepest stage after the Suspend to Disk stage, the latter recovery procedure being referred to as a “resume from STR”.
Of particular convenience, the user may immediately resume computing at the precise location in any application program that was active in the computer at the time the computer entered the sleep mode. To reach that point from the STR stage of sleep mode, the CPU processes a number of steps of the “boot-up” routine for the computer; steps that typically occur in a manner transparent to the user. The computer is able to resume where it left off, because, prior to entering STR, the computer preserved the complete state of all software applications and of all components and devices, including the CPU, in a memory that remained powered up during the “sleep”.
For the power management technique of sleep mode, the CPU and the external memory (DRAM) are independently supplied with power, that is, are located in separate power domains. In the deepest sleep mode, STR, power is removed from the CPU (and other electronic components of the computer, such as the display), while maintaining the DRAM memory and the Southbridge chip under power. The application programs and the state of those application programs (e.g. the CPU “context”) is preserved by transferring the state information to the DRAM.
In processing operation, the CPU executes application programs by continuously modifying both its internal state and memory contents according to the instructions of the program. The internal CPU memory of the X86 system resides in the same power domain as the CPU. Thus, whenever the CPU is powered down, such as for an STR procedure, the internal memory is also powered down, and normally results in the loss of that CPU context. In order for the CPU of the X86 system to resume processing of an application program on Resume from STR, the processor must at that time at least “know” the state of the program on entering STR. Before entering STR, the CPU executes an instruction (of the power management software) that saves the CPU context at a well defined location in external memory, such as the DRAM memory. That context information subsumes the state of the operating system and the state of the application program. By maintaining power to the DRAM during STR, the state information of the program is preserved, and is available for use later upon a Resume from STR.
Once the resume button is pressed and is detected by the Southbridge chip, power is reapplied to the CPU, which commences its start-up routines. The CPU processes the normal boot-up routine stored in the ROM of the BIOS chip. That boot up procedure initializes the internal registers of the CPU and flushes its caches, thereby establishing a baseline state for the CPU. The process takes a noticeable time in which to complete. However, prior to loading the operating system, such as Windows 9x, the routine checks to determine if the boot-up procedure is a “power up reset” as occurs upon initially powering up the computer, or instead is a Resume from STR. When the routine detects the latter condition, the computer “knows” that the state of the operating system software, any application program, and the corresponding CPU context already resides in the external memory (DRAM). The CPU then completes the boot-up procedure by restoring the device states, and, with a special instruction, finally restores the CPU context from the external memory. Thereafter, the CPU is able to simply proceed with executing the next application program instruction exactly where the CPU left off when entering STR.
In a stage of sleep mode that lies one stage above the STR stage, the penultimate stage (e.g. the pre-STR stage) referred to as “deep sleep”, existing operating systems issue an instruction to remove the system clock from the CPU, but to maintain the CPU powered up, continuing to consume battery power. The removal of the system clock reduces power consumption also, but that is not as great a reduction as when power is removed from the CPU, such as during STR. Without clock signals being applied, the CPU is no longer able to process (as would consume additional current), but maintains system context in the associated internal registers of the CPU. That context is not lost and is not required to be saved to external memory as is the case in entering the STR stage. As an advantage, the invention powers down the CPU in all sleep modes and preserves the CPU context, saving additional power.
Accordingly, an object of the invention is to reduce the power consumption or a computer during periods in which the computer is idle, providing a more effective sleep mode.
Another object of the invention is to promote the pre-STR stage of sleep mode in existing power management systems to the STR stage, creating an “Instant STR”, and reduce the time required by the computer system to return from that stage, ideally providing a Resume from STR that appears instantaneous.
And, a related object of the invention is to replace on-the-fly a CPU context maintaining sleep mode of existing computer systems that is governed by the operating system with a substitute sleep mode that affords a lower power consumption and remains transparent to the software.
In accordance with the foregoing objects and advantages, the present invention provides for saving the internal context of the CPU (which includes the state of the application software) and powering down the CPU not only for an STR condition but for any pre-STR stage of sleep mode, and for restoring the state, including such internal context, on the Resume from STR condition, whereby the processor system is quickly restored for operation ready to execute the next instruction of the application program. With the invention, any stage of sleep mode can be promoted to an STR condition to completely power down the CPU in a manner that is transparent to the operating system.
When applied to directly to existing X86 applications and operating systems, the present invention intercepts (or converts) an instruction that calls for an X86 type computer system to enter a CPU context-maintaining sleep mode, a pre-STR stage of sleep mode, and “promotes” or converts that instruction into an instruction to enter the STR stage, and thereafter perform all of the actions described for entering STR. Whereas the X86 operating system of the CPU may “think” that the context of the application program has been saved in one way, the present system actually saves that program context and the CPU context in a different manner, transparent to the X86 operating system. When. Resuming from STR, the context is restored, and the X86 operating system is none the wiser.
In accordance with a more specific aspect, the present invention provides a private memory within the processor system, a memory external to the CPU, that is accessible only to the CPU and is powered independently of the CPU to store the CPU context when the CPU is powered down in a sleep mode. The private memory may constitute a logical portion of the external memory, DRAM, in the X86 system, or may be physically separate therefrom or may constitute a logical partition of the CPU internal memory, such as a cache or subset of such cache. Like the existing DRAM, a key characteristic of the foregoing memory is that such memory is independently powered from the CPU core. In the Transmeta processing system, hereafter noted, that memory may be commandeered to serve as private memory for code morphing software (e.g. “CMS memory”). The power down routine for sleep mode includes reading the internal. CPU context from the internal memory of the CPU, caches and registers, and writing that context within the private memory. When powered up, either initially or on return from STR, the processor determines whether to perform a normal power up operation, called a power on reset, or a context-restoring operation.
On entering into the Instant STR condition, before concomitant powering down of the CPU of the computer, the CPU preserves the entire CPU context in the independently powered private external memory of the CPU. So long as the private memory remains powered up, the CPU context is preserved despite the fact that the CPU is powered down. Upon Resume from Instant STR to resume processing, power is restored to the CPU. During the boot-up process, the CPU detects that the condition is a resume from Instant STR and, in response, restores its entire internal state from the preserved CPU context located in the private memory. Thereafter the CPU may perform an internal resume to the instruction of the application program that follows the last completed instruction of that program.
As an advantage, the CPU is able to automatically and transparently recover from a sleep mode that powers down the CPU and continue execution of any arbitrary computer program after lapses of arbitrary duration in the sleep mode without any assistance being required of the operating system, BIOS or the like.
The present invention is particularly adaptable to incorporation within and enhances a newly disclosed processor system that is found to already contain a private memory that is powered separately from the processor, but is used to store, among other things, only a part of the Internal context of the CPU. That processor system is the very long instruction word (VLIW) processor described, for one, in U.S. Pat. No. 6,031,992, granted Feb. 29, 2000, entitled Combining Hardware and Software to provide an Improved Microprocessor, assigned to Transmeta Corporation, (referred to as the 992 Transmeta patent), which is incorporated herein by reference.
The processor of the 992 Transmeta patent is formed by a combination of a hardware processing portion (called a “morph host”), and an emulating software portion, referred to therein as code morphing software. Among other things, the code morphing software carries out a significant portion of the functions of processors in software, reducing the hardware required for processing and the greater electrical power that such hardware requires. The Transmeta processor serves as the host processor system capable of executing software programs (the “target application”) designed with an instruction set intended to run on a processor system of different design, the target processor, one that contains an instruction set unique to the target processor, but foreign to the host system, such as the X86 type processor.
That processor translates instructions that comprise a target software program is “on-the-fly” into instructions of the host instruction set (the host instructions) and then executes the latter instructions. In so doing, the morph host processor executes the code morphing software which, functioning as either a software “interpreter” or “translator” of target application programs into host processor instructions, which are able to accomplish the purpose of the original application software. For translation, the code morphing software defines a translator, which converts the target instructions to host instructions, and a translation process that translates the target application programs dynamically and optimizes the latter host instructions to provide an optimized translation.
The foregoing Transmeta processing system, hereafter referred to as the Transmeta processor, necessarily keeps track of its state or CPU context during processing operation. It is found that the Transmeta processor places a considerable portion of its CPU context on memory external of the CPU, such as DRAM. Conceptually, that external memory is herein referred to as “private” CPU memory, because that memory is not visible to (and cannot be accessed by) external application programs; and only the code morphing software of the CPU is able to access the private memory. Further the CPU private memory resides in a different power domain than the CPU, and, therefore, may be powered up or down independently of the CPU. Consequently, the private memory is able to maintain a portion of the internal state of the CPU when the CPU is powered down.
Other portions of the CPU context are saved in memory (caches) internal to the CPU, apart from the private memory. Normally that portion of the CPU context (information) would disappear whenever the Transmeta processor is powered down. In accordance with the present invention, the entire CPU context of the Transmeta processor is stored in the private memory in the Instant STR is process. Accordingly, a further object of the invention is to provide a portable computer constructed in accordance with the Transmeta processing system with an improved power saving sleep mode.
When powered up, either initially or on return from Instant STR, the processor determines whether it is to perform a normal power up operation (a power on reset) or a context-restoring operation. Traditional processors typically employ external circuitry to make that decision. The Transmeta processor deposits the corresponding persistent information in the private memory. The presence of that information in the private memory is called an “STR signature”.
As an advantage, the Transmeta CPU is able to automatically and transparently recover from a sleep mode in which the CPU is powered down and continue execution of any arbitrary application program, including target applications, after time lapses of arbitrary duration in the sleep mode without any assistance required of the application program. Upon resume from such a sleep mode, the Transmeta processor is able to continue with execution of a target application program. The Transmeta processor is capable of suspending arbitrary X86 computer programs to private memory (e.g. CMS memory) and automatically and transparently resume executing the next instruction of the program without any assistance of the target application.
The foregoing and additional, objects and advantages of the invention together with the structure characteristic thereof, which was only briefly summarized in the foregoing passages, will become more apparent to those skilled in the art upon reading the detailed description of a preferred embodiment of the invention, which follows in this specification, taken together with the illustrations thereof presented in the accompanying drawings.
In the drawings:
The invention is preferably implemented within the improved 992 Transmeta processor system earlier described, which implements software-enhanced execution (eg. dynamic translation), and is best explained in connection with that processor. The principal elements of that processing system as modified to incorporate the invention are symbolically illustrated in
The foregoing architecture is recognized as different from the traditional, processor systems, such as the X86 system, which does not contain memory 5. As represented by the power arrows P1, the private memory 5 resides in a separate power domain than CPU 1 (and memory 3). Hence, electrical power to each component of the system may be separately and independently controlled, more specifically, CPU 1 may be powered down, while private memory 5 remains powered.
During processing operation, the Transmeta CPU 1 keeps track of its state or context. Since the Transmeta computer “virtualizes” the target processor, such as the X86 processor system, the computer must also keep track of the state of the X86 processor system, possibly including part of the chipset and the target (X86) application program for that processor, which is being translated and executed by the code morphing software. Hence, the context of the Transmeta processor constitutes a super-set of and subsumes the state of the X86 processor system.
The context, of the Transmeta processing system is reflected in the contents of the general purpose registers, including core special registers (“CSR's”), peripheral special registers (“PSR's”), and the Northbridge registers, the D-cache, the I-cache, local program memory (“LPM”), and local data memory (“LDM”). Some of that context is stored in private memory 5. However, the internal context of CPU 1 is stored in internal memory, represented in the dotted block 6 within CPU 1.
The Transmeta computer includes a start up procedure to initialize and configure (“set up”) the computer and begin processing, a procedure defined by software or in firmware, such as ROM code, which is included. That start-up procedure (“boot-up”) is initiated once power to the computer is switched on to apply power (P1, P2, and P3) to both the CPU 1 and memories 3 and 5, a “boot-up” procedure referred to as “power-on reset”.
The processor commences the start up procedure, as represented by operation 11 in
The CPU locates the CMS boot loader routine in the flash ROM and installs that routine in internal memory 6, as represented at block 13. As represented by operation 15, the CMS boot loader continues with configuring the cache, the private memory 5, and, possibly, the other memory.
At this juncture, and in accordance with the invention, the boot loader looks for an “STR signature”, operation 19, which is later described herein in greater detail in connection with a Resume from STR condition. However, since the initial power on reset of the computer is presently being described, the STR signature is not present, and the decision at decisional block 21 is negative. A discussion of the operation that occurs when the STR signature is found is reserved to a later point in this description. The normal power on reset process continues, represented at operation 23, with the boot loader program requiring CPU 1 to locate the compressed CMS in the flash ROM, decompress the CMS and load that software in the private memory 5 where stored for use in processing. Depending upon the design of the computer, the program may also set up a debugging environment for the processor, prior to decompressing the code morphing software.
Once stored in private memory 5, the boot loader routine “jumps” into the code morphing software at its “reset” vector in private memory 5, as represented at block 25 and begins executing (e.g. starts) the CMS. On starting, the CMS resets the CPU registers and establishes the CPU context, as represented by block 27A, configures other memory, block 27B, and then commences normal processing, the details of which are not relevant or material to the present invention.
Continuing with right side of
Should the period of inactivity continue until the comparison determination results in an interval of greater than Tmax, a flag is set, represented by an affirmative decision at block 12. On finding that flag, the CPU program branches from the main routine to retrieve and execute the Instant STR routine, as represented at block 16
An initial step in the Instant STR routine is to retrieve the part of the CPU context and Northbridge registers that is stored in the CPU's internal memory, and save that context in private memory 5. As represented at block 18, the foregoing state information is stored in the private memory along with the normal X86 execution state information, which the Transmeta processor normally saves in that memory.
Thereafter, the processor initiates the chipset to shut down power to CPU 1 (and other components of the processor), excepting the private memory 5, after a defined short: time interval and sets the STR signature, as represented by operation 20. The chipset withdraws the power P1 to the CPU, which ceases operation at this point. Any information in the internal memories of the CPU disappears. Since private memory 5 remains powered up, that is, P2 (
While shutting down (i.e. before removing the power), CMS detects the Instant STR event and sets a corresponding flag (e.g. the “STR signature”) in non-volatile memory. This enables the code morphing software to detect the Instant STR condition upon a power-on-reset, as later herein described. The foregoing flag may be implemented by writing the STR signature into private memory 5 Concurrently additional hardware, such as the Southbridge chip, serves to monitor the user input device 7 (
The sequence of operation proceeds through the operations represented by operational blocks 13, 15 and 19, earlier described and not here repeated. When the boot loader checks for an STR signature this time as represented at block 19, an affirmative determination is made at decisional block 21. The processor clears the STR signature, 30, skips decompressing CMS as the software resides in the private memory, and, as represented in block 32 directly jumps into the CMS “resume from STR” routine vector in private memory 5. The CMS commences by restoring the internal CPU context and Northbridge registers from the private memory into the appropriate registers of the CPU as represented at operation 34 and configures other memory 36. With internal CPU context restored, all memories configured, and program state present in the private memory, the processor is restored to the state existing at the time of initiation of the sleep mode procedure at which juncture the processor may then retrieve the next instruction of the X86 target application for execution, as represented at block 38. As one appreciates, the foregoing method completes rapidly.
An alternative embodiment of the sleep mode invention would employ faster memory still, but would require modification to the structure of the Transmeta computer. Specifically, where it is practicable to modify the integrated circuit chip that contains the processor of the Transmeta computer so as to permit the on-chip caches to be powered up or down separately from the remaining elements of the processor, then it is possible to retain the internal context of the CPU within the processor during the sleep mode, avoiding the necessity for transferring the internal context to the private memory and back again during resume from the Instant STR procedure. Such a configuration is illustrated in
The foregoing invention may be incorporated within target processing systems that currently employ a sleep mode, such as the X86 system, but requires some modification to the target system's operating software. Since a memory of the X86 system is already powered separately from the CPU of the processing system and for sleep mode operation that memory is already used to store the state of the operating system and the application program, an extra portion of that external memory may be used to also store the internal context of the X86 CPU.
Assume two levels of “sleep” for the X86 type computer: A first level in which the central processing unit (CPU) of the processor maintains the CPU context and a second level, more deep than the first, in which the context of the CPU is not maintained. In the first level, the Southbridge circuit of the processor shuts off (sic “kills”) the input clocks to the CPU, but maintains power to the CPU. The BIOS and operating system (“OS”) of the computer typically uses the first level or state a good deal of the time, because the state is low-overhead. In the second level, the Southbridge circuit kills the CPU input clocks, as before, and then also removes electrical power to the CPU and other devices of the processor. As a result of the removal of electrical power, the context information of the CPU state is lost. The BIOS and OS of the computer uses this second state less frequently than the first because the state is high overhead.
The present invention permits transparent power cycling of the CPU, turning the CPU off and then turning the CPU on, repeatedly at will, with low overhead (e.g. virtually maintaining the CPU context). Two embodiments of the invention are thus possible. The invention may replace the STR process found in the X86 processor system. In such an embodiment, the resume process restores the processor more quickly than the existing STR procedure although no savings is made in power consumption.
In a preferred embodiment, the invention replaces the CPU context-maintaining sleep state of the X86 system (e.g. “deep sleep” which is the deepest CPU context maintaining sleep mode) and the invention “tricks” the BIOS and/or OS to “think” that the CPU is placed in the sleep mode, deep sleep, when, in fact, once the BIOS and OS initiates the “deep sleep” action, all electrical power is removed from the CPU and the CPU enters the Instant STR condition. The advantage is that less power is consumed over time than when the CPU is placed in sleep mode. And with the benefit of the very rapid resume from STR action available with the invention the computer user never knows that the CPU had been turned off.
The foregoing second embodiment is possible of accomplishment in two different species. In the first specie of the preferred embodiment the code morphing software of the Transmeta processor intercepts the command issued by the operating system, such as Windows 9X, to shut down the CPU clock input to the CPU. Then the code morphing software issues a command to power down the CPU completely, that is, disable the CPU clock input and also remove electrical power from the CPU. Thus while the operating system “thinks” that the CPU remains powered. In fact, the CPU is completely powered down. In that sense the action is transparent to the X86 OS software and to the BIOS. In existing computers the context of the CPU is lost in this power saving mode. In the present invention the CPU context is saved in private memory 5.
The second species of the preferred embodiment requires the BIOS and/or the OS software to be modified to explicitly invoke an Instant STR operation. It may not be possible to accomplish this in computers that use a “closed” operating system, such as WINDOWS 9X, that can only be modified by the copyright owner, but can be readily accomplished in “open” operating systems, such as the familiar LINUX operating system. In new generations of BIOS and OS software, such a command may be easily incorporated, if timely suggested to the designers of such software.
By powering down the CPU additional power savings may be achieved when the computer is left idle. In the case of present CPU's operating at 600 MHz, the power saving is about sixty milliwatts. That savings would increase for computers in the future that contain future versions of CPU's containing process technology advances that typically allow higher operating frequencies, but result in greater power consumption in sleep mode.
It is believed that the foregoing description of the preferred embodiments of the invention is sufficient in detail to enable one skilled in the art to make and use the invention. However, it is expressly understood that the detail of the elements presented for the foregoing purpose is not intended to limit the scope of the invention, in as much as equivalents to those elements and other modifications thereof, all of which come within the scope of the invention, will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon reading this specification. Thus, the invention is to be broadly construed within the full scope of the appended claims.
This application is a continuation application of the U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/201,624, filed Aug. 10, 2005, by Fleischmann et al., and entitled “A System and Method for Saving and Restoring a Processor State Without Executing Any Instructions From a First Instruction Set,” now U.S. Pat. No. 7,730,330, which in turn is a continuation application of the U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/595,198, filed Jun. 16, 2000, by Fleischmann et al., and entitled “System and Method for Preserving Internal Processor Context When the Processor Is Powered Down and Restoring the Internal Processor Context When Processor Is Restored,” now U.S. Pat. No. 6,968,469, both of which are hereby incorporated by reference in entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3863228 | Taylor | Jan 1975 | A |
4245302 | Amdahl | Jan 1981 | A |
4409665 | Tubbs | Oct 1983 | A |
4458316 | Fry et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
4467411 | Fry et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
4481573 | Fukunaga et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4523206 | Sasscer | Jun 1985 | A |
4530050 | Fukunaga et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4590549 | Burrage et al. | May 1986 | A |
4598402 | Matsumoto et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4607331 | Goodrich, Jr. et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4720811 | Yamaguchi et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4763333 | Byrd | Aug 1988 | A |
4825412 | Sager et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4833347 | Rabe | May 1989 | A |
4875160 | Brown, III | Oct 1989 | A |
4896257 | Ikeda et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4907150 | Arroyo et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4912628 | Briggs | Mar 1990 | A |
4914577 | Stewart et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4928225 | McCarthy et al. | May 1990 | A |
4937473 | Statz et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4937789 | Matsubara | Jun 1990 | A |
4954942 | Masuda et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4992934 | Portanova et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5021950 | Nishikawa | Jun 1991 | A |
5041964 | Cole et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5086501 | DeLuca et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5097409 | Schwartz et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5138708 | Vosbury | Aug 1992 | A |
5142672 | Johnson et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5142684 | Perry et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5163153 | Cole et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5167024 | Smith et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5175853 | Kardach et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5197144 | Edenfield et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5201059 | Nguyen | Apr 1993 | A |
5204863 | Saint-Joigny et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5204963 | Noya et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5218704 | Watts, Jr. et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5222239 | Rosch | Jun 1993 | A |
5230055 | Katz et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5239646 | Kimura | Aug 1993 | A |
5239652 | Seibert et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5247628 | Grohoski | Sep 1993 | A |
5247648 | Watkins et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5257223 | Dervisoglu | Oct 1993 | A |
5274815 | Trissel et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5276888 | Kardach et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5280592 | Ryba et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5282274 | Liu | Jan 1994 | A |
5291604 | Kardach et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5317720 | Stamm et al. | May 1994 | A |
5321845 | Sawase et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5327566 | Forsyth | Jul 1994 | A |
5337285 | Ware et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5349658 | O'Rourke et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5355468 | Jeppesen, III et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5361340 | Kelly et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5410658 | Sawase et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5410665 | Molnar | Apr 1995 | A |
5410713 | White et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5422806 | Chen et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5437017 | Moore et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5440520 | Schutz et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5442766 | Chu et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5455834 | Chang et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5461266 | Koreeda et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5463767 | Joichi et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5465337 | Kong | Nov 1995 | A |
5467473 | Kahle et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5473767 | Kardach et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5481685 | Nguyen et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5481719 | Ackerman et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5493660 | DeLano et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5497494 | Combs et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5502838 | Kikinis | Mar 1996 | A |
5507030 | Sites | Apr 1996 | A |
5511203 | Wisor et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5517615 | Sefidvash et al. | May 1996 | A |
5526510 | Akkary et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5528127 | Streit | Jun 1996 | A |
5528755 | Beardsley et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5532958 | Jiang et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5537559 | Kane et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5539885 | Ono et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5542059 | Blomgren | Jul 1996 | A |
5546552 | Coon et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5553255 | Jain et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5560020 | Nakatani et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5561814 | Glew et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5563839 | Herdt et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5564014 | Yamashita et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5564018 | Flores et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5564104 | Pourfarzaneh | Oct 1996 | A |
5564111 | Glew et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5566298 | Boggs et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5568614 | Mendelson et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5572719 | Biesterfeldt | Nov 1996 | A |
5574922 | James | Nov 1996 | A |
5574927 | Scantlin | Nov 1996 | A |
5577231 | Scalzi et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5581198 | Trimberger | Dec 1996 | A |
5581722 | Welland | Dec 1996 | A |
5592173 | Lau et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5598546 | Blomgren | Jan 1997 | A |
5598560 | Benson | Jan 1997 | A |
5600588 | Kawashima | Feb 1997 | A |
5604753 | Bauer et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5613083 | Glew et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5613090 | Willems | Mar 1997 | A |
5615162 | Houston | Mar 1997 | A |
5615327 | Magee et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5617572 | Pearce et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5623628 | Brayton et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5625835 | Ebcioglu et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5628001 | Cepuran | May 1997 | A |
5630110 | Mote, Jr. | May 1997 | A |
5630143 | Maher et al. | May 1997 | A |
5632037 | Maher et al. | May 1997 | A |
5634131 | Matter et al. | May 1997 | A |
5638525 | Hammond et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5644742 | Shen et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5652890 | Foster et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5657483 | Kardach et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5671229 | Harari et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5675808 | Gulick et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5682093 | Kivela | Oct 1997 | A |
5682345 | Roohparvar et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5682351 | Han | Oct 1997 | A |
5682471 | Billings et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5687114 | Khan | Nov 1997 | A |
5692204 | Rawson et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5701493 | Jaggar | Dec 1997 | A |
5701783 | Lin | Dec 1997 | A |
5704040 | Gunji | Dec 1997 | A |
5710929 | Fung | Jan 1998 | A |
5713030 | Evoy | Jan 1998 | A |
5717319 | Jokinen | Feb 1998 | A |
5719800 | Mittal et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5721927 | Baraz et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5726901 | Brown | Mar 1998 | A |
5727208 | Brown | Mar 1998 | A |
5732243 | McMahan | Mar 1998 | A |
5737615 | Tetrick | Apr 1998 | A |
5740391 | Hunt | Apr 1998 | A |
5740416 | McMahan | Apr 1998 | A |
5745375 | Reinhardt et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5751982 | Morley | May 1998 | A |
5752011 | Thomas et al. | May 1998 | A |
5752074 | Gallup et al. | May 1998 | A |
5754869 | Holzhammer et al. | May 1998 | A |
5757171 | Babcock | May 1998 | A |
5760636 | Noble et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5761518 | Boehling et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5765001 | Clark et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5765004 | Foster et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5768567 | Klein et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5774703 | Weiss et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5778237 | Yamamoto et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5787294 | Evoy | Jul 1998 | A |
5790825 | Traut | Aug 1998 | A |
5792970 | Mizobata | Aug 1998 | A |
5799188 | Manikundalam et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5799200 | Brant et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5805490 | Machida | Sep 1998 | A |
5812860 | Horden et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5815724 | Mates | Sep 1998 | A |
5825674 | Jackson | Oct 1998 | A |
5828861 | Miyayama et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5832205 | Kelly et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5832284 | Michail et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5835951 | McMahan | Nov 1998 | A |
5835967 | McMahan | Nov 1998 | A |
5838948 | Bunza | Nov 1998 | A |
5842029 | Conary et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5844422 | Trimberger et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5848281 | Smalley et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5852737 | Bikowsky | Dec 1998 | A |
5864659 | Kini | Jan 1999 | A |
5875340 | Quarnstrom et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5878264 | Ebrahim | Mar 1999 | A |
5884049 | Atkinson | Mar 1999 | A |
5887152 | Tran | Mar 1999 | A |
5894577 | MacDonald et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5898880 | Ryu | Apr 1999 | A |
5903766 | Walker et al. | May 1999 | A |
5913067 | Klein | Jun 1999 | A |
5914946 | Avidor et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5915262 | Bridgers et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5919262 | Kikinis et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5923545 | Nguyen | Jul 1999 | A |
5930832 | Heaslip et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5933649 | Lim et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5935259 | Anderson | Aug 1999 | A |
5939915 | Curran | Aug 1999 | A |
5940785 | Georgiou et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5940786 | Steeby | Aug 1999 | A |
5951702 | Lim et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5958061 | Kelly et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5963737 | Mealey et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5974557 | Thomas et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5978923 | Kou | Nov 1999 | A |
5986962 | Bertin et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5991531 | Song et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5996083 | Gupta et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5996084 | Watts | Nov 1999 | A |
6021500 | Wang et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6026018 | Herdt et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6031992 | Cmelik et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6034886 | Chan et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6035407 | Gebara et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6038661 | Yoshioka et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6047248 | Georgiou et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6058063 | Jang | May 2000 | A |
6078319 | Bril et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6079003 | Witt et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6081890 | Datta | Jun 2000 | A |
6088806 | Chee | Jul 2000 | A |
6088807 | Maher et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6094367 | Hsu et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6111806 | Shirley et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6112164 | Hobson | Aug 2000 | A |
6118306 | Orton et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6119241 | Michail et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6128243 | Chan et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6128746 | Clark et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6141762 | Nicol et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6157092 | Hofmann | Dec 2000 | A |
6173376 | Fowler et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6182231 | Gilgen | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6199152 | Kelly et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6202090 | Simone | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6202104 | Ober | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6208127 | Doluca | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6208543 | Tupuri et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6216235 | Thomas et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6231147 | Bosshart | May 2001 | B1 |
6233293 | Myers et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6243831 | Mustafa et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6246627 | Yamauchi et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6249473 | Lau et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6256252 | Arimoto | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6266752 | Witt et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6266776 | Sakai | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6272642 | Pole et al. | Aug 2001 | B2 |
6279048 | Fadavi-Ardekani et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6279078 | Sicola et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6304824 | Bausch et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6308279 | Toll et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6308285 | Bowers | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6311281 | Pole, II et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6311287 | Dischler et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6314522 | Chu et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6343363 | Maher et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6345363 | Levy-Kendler | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6347379 | Dai et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6353552 | Sample et al. | Mar 2002 | B2 |
6378081 | Hammond | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6388432 | Uchida | May 2002 | B2 |
6397242 | Devine et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6405320 | Lee et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6415379 | Keppel et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6415388 | Browning et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6425086 | Clark et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6427211 | Watts, Jr. | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6437623 | Hsu et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6442746 | James et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6457082 | Zhang et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6457135 | Cooper | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6477654 | Dean et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6484265 | Borkar et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6484274 | Lee et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6487668 | Thomas et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6501999 | Cai | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6502196 | Chang et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6510400 | Moriyama | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6510525 | Nookala et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6513124 | Furuichi et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6519706 | Ogoro | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6564328 | Grochowski et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6571316 | D'Souza et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6574739 | Kung et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6577153 | Kodama | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6580650 | Ellis et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6615300 | Banning et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6675304 | Pole et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6694443 | Maher et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6704880 | Dai et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6718457 | Tremblay et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6775786 | Toll et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6826682 | Rozas et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6880152 | Torvalds et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6910141 | Maher et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6978390 | Maher et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7000132 | Maher et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7062666 | Maher et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7120810 | Maher et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7305502 | Kadatch et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
20020026597 | Dai et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020073348 | Tani | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020083356 | Dai | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020087896 | Cline et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020138778 | Cole et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
5425896 | Oct 1996 | AU |
69614515 | Apr 2002 | DE |
0651331 | May 1995 | EP |
0742512 | Nov 1996 | EP |
53-63820 | Jun 1978 | JP |
60-54048 | Mar 1985 | JP |
01100638 | Apr 1989 | JP |
01255933 | Oct 1989 | JP |
02-213942 | Aug 1990 | JP |
03-30022 | Feb 1991 | JP |
03-269628 | Feb 1991 | JP |
03255535 | Nov 1991 | JP |
04-246728 | Sep 1992 | JP |
7-505242 | Jun 1995 | JP |
8314721 | Nov 1996 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11201624 | Aug 2005 | US |
Child | 12136679 | US | |
Parent | 09595198 | Jun 2000 | US |
Child | 11201624 | US |