This application relates to lockboxes, and more specifically to using restricted range wireless communications, between a lockbox and an access device.
Lockboxes are typically used to a provide a secured storage area for a key or other access aid at a location close to a locked property accessible by the key. In this way, an authorized user can unlock the secured storage area, obtain the key and then use the key to unlock the locked property.
The locked property may be a home or other property that is locked while unattended by a traditional lock that requires a key. In other situations, the locked property may be a commercial or industrial site, or other type of property.
The lockbox is typically attached to a door handle or to another stationary object near the traditional lock. The lockbox is typically configured to require the user to demonstrate that he is authorized to obtain access to the locked property before the secured storage area is unlocked to allow the user to obtain the key. In a mechanical lockbox, the user might be required to enter a correct lock combination to access the secured storage area. In an electronic lockbox, the user might be required to communicate a credential to the lockbox (via a physical connection to the lockbox or via a wireless link to the lockbox) to access the secured storage area.
Conventional electronic lockboxes allow users to communicate their credentials wirelessly via the IrDa standard, i.e., by using infrared signals generated by the user's cellular telephone or personal digital assistant and directed toward the lockbox. In addition, information is typically communicated in the other direction, i.e., from the lockbox to the access device. Also, the lockbox and/or the access device may have other communications links, such as with a central authorization authority that issues credentials to users and collects information from lockboxes on access activity. Infrared communications require line of sight alignment, which is often inconvenient.
Other lockbox approaches use far-field RF communications, but these can lead to problems with interference, excessive power drain, regulatory concerns, difficulty in addressing only a specific desired lockbox among multiple lockboxes located in close proximity and higher component and maintenance costs.
It would be desirable to provide a lockbox, lockbox and access device system and associated methods that address some of the problems of the prior art. It would be desirable to provide a lockbox with restricted range wireless communications capability, such as within about 30 cm or even about 15 cm, that is reliable, is convenient to operate and provides improved security.
According to one implementation, a lockbox includes a housing, a key storage area and a lockbox circuit. The key storage area is shaped to receive a stored key and is attached to or positioned within the housing. The key storage area is secured with a lock mechanism to prevent unauthorized access to the stored key. The lockbox circuit comprises a transceiver operable by a magnetically induced current generated by a closely positioned radio access device that can send and receive signals. The circuit is configured to unlock the key storage area upon determining that an access request is authorized to providing access to the stored key.
According to another implementation, a lockbox and access device system comprises a lockbox with a key storage area shaped to store a key, a lock mechanism actuatable to secure the key storage area and a circuit coupled to the lock mechanism and responsive to wireless signals within the near field region, an access device capable of near field region communication with the lockbox by magnetically inducing a current within the lockbox circuit to request access to the key storage mechanism and a networked authorization authority linkable with the access device to receive information about a user of the device and to send an authorization to the device.
According to another implementation, a lockbox with restricted range wireless communication capability comprises a housing, a key storage area shaped to receive a stored key, the key storing area being attached to or positioned within the housing and secured with a lock mechanism to prevent unauthorized access to the stored key, a lockbox circuit comprising a transceiver that can send communications to and receive communications a device within a restricted range of less than about 15 cm, the circuit being configured to unlock the key storage area upon receipt of a predetermined unlock signal, thereby providing access to the stored key.
According to another implementation, a lockbox comprises a lockbox housing, a key storage area within the lockbox housing, the key storage area having a locking mechanism for controlling access to the key storage area, a loop antenna physically coupled to the lockbox housing, an NFC transceiver coupled to the loop antenna, a controller coupled to the NFC transceiver and an opening circuit coupled between the controller and the locking mechanism of the key storage area for opening the key storage area in response to a request from the controller.
According to another implementation, a method of controlling a lockbox, comprises receiving electrical power from an access device through inductive coupling, using the received electrical power to activate an NFC transceiver positioned within the lockbox, and communicating wirelessly between the NFC transceiver and the access device to receive a command from the access device relating to the lockbox.
Disclosed below are representative embodiments of a lockbox that should not be construed as limiting in any way. Instead, the present disclosure is directed toward all novel and nonobvious features and aspects of the various disclosed methods, apparatus, and equivalents thereof, alone and in various combinations and subcombinations with one another. The disclosed technology is not limited to any specific aspect or feature, or combination thereof, nor do the disclosed methods and apparatus require that any one or more specific advantages be present or problems be solved.
As used in this application and in the claims, the singular forms “a,” “an” and “the” include the plural forms unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Additionally, the term “includes” means “comprises.” Moreover, unless the context dictates otherwise, the term “coupled” means physically connected or electrically or electromagnetically connected or linked and includes both direct connections or direct links and indirect connections or indirect links through one or more intermediate elements.
Although the operations of some of the disclosed methods and apparatus are described in a particular, sequential order for convenient presentation, it should be understood that this manner of description encompasses rearrangement, unless a particular ordering is required by specific language set forth below. For example, operations described sequentially may in some cases be rearranged or performed concurrently. Moreover, for the sake of simplicity, the attached figures may not show the various ways in which the disclosed methods and apparatus can be used in conjunction with other methods and apparatus.
Described below is a lockbox with restricted range communications capability that does not require line of sight alignment. In specific implementations, the lockbox has a key storage area, which is typically positioned within or attached to a housing of the lockbox and is sized to store a key or other access aid (e.g., a card). The key storage area has a cover (e.g., door) that is locked or secured with a lock mechanism. According to some implementations, the lockbox has a circuit responsive to wireless communications from an access device within the working restricted range of the lockbox. The circuit is configured to provide access to the stored key, such as by unlocking the lock mechanism or other action, when an authorized request for access is received from the access device.
The lockbox includes a transceiver (if implemented for two-way communication) or a receiver (if implemented for one-way communication), and an appropriate antenna. The lockbox circuit also includes logic or a controller that controls and coordinates the operation of the lockbox and a lock mechanism activation portion operable to energize or otherwise enable operation of the lock mechanism. One function of the logic or controller is to process information from the access device representing an identity of a user seeking access (such as a credential), determine whether access is authorized, and, depending upon that determination, either grant access (i.e., by unlocking the lock mechanism) or deny access (i.e., by maintaining the lock mechanism in a locked state). In some embodiments, the lockbox circuit includes a real time clock and a battery for the real time clock. In some embodiments, power for the lockbox circuit is provided by the access device and the lockbox does not have a battery for providing a primary source of power. In some embodiments, the lockbox circuit includes a memory and/or a display or other type of indicator.
The access device, also called a “key” or “electronic key,” may be a cellular telephone, “smart” phone or other type of telephone (hereinafter “phone”), personal digital assistant (PDA) or other personal electronic device with restricted range communication capability. A dedicated access device, i.e., a device having a primary function of communicating with lockboxes, may also be used. Although this application is primarily concerned with restricted range wireless communications between the access device and the lockbox not limited to line of sight alignment, the lockbox may also support other forms of communication, such as WiFi, Bluetooth, IrDA, etc., to allow other forms of access devices to be used in the system.
Conventional technologies are not well suited to providing a restricted range yet easy to use and secure lockbox. Bluetooth wireless technology was designed to replace cables between cell phones, laptops, and other computing and communication devices within a 10-meter range. Wi-Fi technology was designed and optimized for Local Area Networks (LAN). Wi-Fi provides an extension or replacement of wired networks for dozens of computing devices within a +100-meter range. ZigBee wireless technology is a standard enabling control and monitoring capabilities for industrial and residential applications within a +100-meter range. IrDA technology is a short range (<1 meter), line-of-sight communication standard for exchange of data over infrared light. IrDA interfaces are frequently used in computers, and in some mobile phones (at least currently). RFID (Radio Frequency Identification) is an automatic identification method, relying on storing and remotely retrieving data using devices called RFID tags. An RFID tag is a small object that can be attached to or incorporated into a product. RFID tags contain silicon chips to enable them to receive and respond to queries from an RFID reader/writer.
Lockbox Environment
Using a restricted range wireless technology in the lockbox environment overcomes a number of deficiencies in current technologies and offers several advantages.
Conventional lockboxes that establish an electrical connection by physical contact are sometimes unreliable and are less convenient.
One conventional wireless approach using infrared communication (such as according to IrDa) requires line of sight alignment. Current infrared lockboxes, such as the GE Security iBox 1692, may consume more power over the life of the lockbox because it must wake up from a sleep mode at periodic intervals and monitor for incoming infrared signals.
Other conventional wireless approaches, such as far-field RF communications, also must wake up and monitor for signals at periodic intervals. In addition, far-field communications require a relatively high current even when the lockbox is in a sleep mode, which consumes battery power more quickly than desired. If larger batteries are used, then larger devices and larger antennas may also be required. In general, conventional systems require that lockbox and the access device each has its own source of power, which increases initial expense and maintenance costs.
Conventionally, pairing an access device to a lockbox can require several manual steps, which is inefficient. Far-field RF communications and Bluetooth have greater operating ranges, leading to a higher risk that communications will be intercepted. In addition, technologies with greater operating ranges cause pairing problems when a user is attempting to access one lockbox where several others are located nearby. One pairing problem is correctly addressing only one lockbox among several that are located in close proximity to each other. Another pairing problem is avoiding inadvertently accessing another lockbox, because it is located within the extended range, such that an unauthorized person might gain access.
Also, far-field RF can be subject to interference and may be subject to regulation at higher power. Far-field radio communications refer to those between an antenna emitting radiating radio waves and a device receiving those waves. According to one definition, the far-field is defined as a separating distance between two devices in communication (such as a lockbox and an access device) exceeding more than one wavelength of the radio signal. Far-field signals decay as the square of the distance from the antenna.
Alternatively, radio communications can be carried out in a near field region where the devices are positioned much closer together than in far field communications. Near field communications, according to one definition, occur within a separating distance less than one wavelength. According to another definition, the boundary of the near field region is located at a distance of c=2Πf, where f is the frequency of the alternating current field generated by the transmitting device. In the near field region, the magnetic field lines of one device interact with those of the other device, thus allowing the transmitting device to magnetically induce an electric current in the receiving device. This near field signal decays as the cube of the distance from the antenna, and thus decays even more rapidly than far-field signal strength.
Thus, a lockbox and access device capable of magnetically induced coupling within the near field region is one example of a restricted range system providing advantages over conventional approaches. Because the near field region exists only at a limited distance between the lockbox and the access device, the access device must be positioned close to the lockbox for communications, which enhances the privacy of the communications. At the same time, the access device need not be aligned along a precise direction with the lockbox, as is the case with infrared communications. Also, because the near field signal decays so rapidly with increasing distance, there is a much reduced chance of inadvertent communication with other nearby lockboxes and less chance of signal interception by others.
Communications between the lockbox 110 and the cellular telephone 120 may be two-way, as indicated by the two-way arrow representing a communications link 115. In some cases, one-way communication from the cellular telephone 120 to the lockbox 110 may be sufficient.
All of the conventional lockbox functions are supported. Thus, the communications from the cellular telephone 120 to the lockbox 110 would include the ability for the user of the cellular telephone 120 to make an access request directed to the lockbox 110. This access request would include communication of a credential indicating that the user is authorized for access.
In response, the lockbox may communicate a message, either via a display on the lockbox or via a message transmitted to the cellular telephone 120, denying access. Access may be denied, e.g., if the user is unauthorized, if the user's credentials have expired, or if the access privileges have been superseded (i.e., if the property owner has overridden access privileges or is invoking the call before showing feature).
If access is granted, the lockbox 110 allows the user to gain access to a key storage area 112 (
The lockbox 110 may be a conventional lockbox, such as the GE Security iBox 1692, modified to use restricted range wireless communications, either instead of or in addition to the current IrDa communications capability. The lockbox 110 may be further modified to function with power received from the access device, instead of from a dedicated battery in the lockbox 110. The cellular telephone 120 may be any cellular telephone having restricted range wireless communications capability or other equivalent access device.
Optionally, the system 100 may also include an authorization authority 140, which can be linked to the lockbox 110 (via a link 145), or to the cellular telephone 120 (via the link 150) or to both the lockbox 110 and the cellular telephone 120. The authorization authority can administer granting credentials to users, collect information on usage and activity and provide for updates to devices (lockboxes and access devices) in the system 100.
There are a number of possible ways to implement restricted range wireless communications by which the communicating devices are magnetically coupled. As only one example, the devices can be configured according to the Near Field Communication standards.
Near Field Communication (NFC) is described as a standards based, short range wireless connectivity technology that enables simple and safe two-way interactions among appropriately configured electronic devices. Near Field Communication is based on inductive-coupling, where loosely coupled inductive circuits share power and data over a distance of a few centimeters. NFC devices share some similarities with proximity (13.56 MHz) RFID tags and contactless smartcards, but have a number of new features.
NFC is described as being fast, private and easy as compared to other wireless standards. The NFC set-up time is less than 0.1 millisecond, which is much less than the Bluetooth set-up time of about 6 seconds and less than the IrDa set-up time of about 0.5 second. The NFC operating range is 10 cm or less, which is shorter and provides for more privacy than RFID (operating range up to 3 meters) and Bluetooth (up to 30 meters). At the same time, NFC is more convenient than IrDa which requires line of sight alignment for communication between devices, whereas NFC requires only that the devices be within the NFC operating range of each other. Thus, NFC is one communications technology ideally suited to implementing a restricted range lockbox. In addition, RFID is largely limited to item tracking, and Bluetooth is comparatively more difficult to use because some configuration of the device is required.
NFC operates at 13.56 MHz and transfers data at up to 424 Kbits/second (current data rates are 106 kbps, 212 kbps and 424 kbps). The 13.56 MHz band is not currently regulated, so no license is required. NFC is both a “read” and “write” technology. NFC devices are unique in that they can change their mode of operation to be in reader/writer mode, peer-to-peer mode, or card emulation mode. In reader/writer mode, an NFC device is capable of reading NFC tag types, such as in the scenario of reading an NFC Smartposter tag. The reader/writer mode is on the RF interface compliant with the ISO 14443 and FeliCa schemes. In Peer-to-Peer mode, two NFC devices can exchange data. For example, Bluetooth or Wi-Fi link set up parameters can be shared, and/or data such as virtual business cards or digital photos can be exchanged. Peer-to-Peer mode is standardized on the ISO/IEC 18092 standard. In Card Emulation mode, the NFC device itself acts as an NFC tag (which is a passive device that stores data), appearing to an external reader much the same as a traditional contactless smart card. This enables, for example, contactless payments and eticketing.
Communication between two NFC-compatible devices occurs when they are brought within operating range of each other: a simple wave or touch of a device can establish an NFC connection, which is then compatible with other known wireless technologies such as Bluetooth or Wi-Fi. Because the transmission range is so short, NFC-enabled transactions are inherently secure. Also, the required physical proximity of one device to another is intuitive and gives users the reassurance of being in control of the process.
The underlying layers of NFC technology follow ISO/IEC (International Organization for Standardization/International Electrotechnical Commission, ECMA (European Telecommunications Standards Institute), and ETSI (European Telecommunications Standards Institute) standards. NFC compliant devices in the NFC Reader/Writer mode must support the RF requirements for ISO/IEC 14443A, ISO/IEC 14443 B and FeliCa as outlined in the relevant parts in the ISO 18092. As of this time, there are five published NFC specifications: Smart Poster Record Type Definition (RTD); Data Exchange Format; Record Type Definition; Text RTD and URI RTD. NFC devices are naturally interoperable, as NFC is based on pre-existing contactless payment and ticketing standards that are used on a daily basis by millions of people and devices worldwide. These standards determine not only the “contactless” operating environment, such as the physical requirements of the antennas, but also the format of the data to be transferred and the data rates for that transfer.
Because NFC components are generally smaller, the size of the access device can be kept small, which increases convenience. Also, the size of the lockbox can be reduced.
In some embodiments, the NFC-enabled lockbox can be designed as a passive device that receives its operating power from an NFC access device brought into the NFC operating range of the lockbox. In this way, the battery can be eliminated from the lockbox.
The transceiver 204 can be coupled to a controller 206, such as a microprocessor or microcontroller. A clock 208 can be coupled to the controller 206 in a well-known fashion. The controller 206 is coupled to the NFC transceiver for two-way communication there between. The controller can also be coupled to one or more lock opening circuits associated with the lock box that open associated locking mechanisms. For example, a shackle opening circuit 212 opens a locking mechanism of shackle 113 in response to an activation signal 214 from the controller. Likewise, the controller 206 can be coupled to a key storage opening circuit 216 to open a locking mechanism associated with the key storage area 112 in response to activation of a signal 215. The circuits used at 212 and 216 are well-known in the art and generally include charge pumps and capacitors to raise the voltage levels needed to operate the locking mechanisms. A power source 218, such as a battery, can be coupled to all of the components in the circuit 200 needing power, such as the clock 208, the controller 206, and the circuits 212 and 216. The power source 218 may optionally also be coupled to the NFC transceiver 204. Alternatively, the NFC transceiver may obtain power from the loop antenna 202, as described further below. The access device generally also includes an antenna, such as antenna 220. For example, the antenna 220 can be a loop antenna located in the cell phone 120. The antenna 220 is desirably tuned to the same frequency as antenna 202 for high-quality communication there between. The cell phone 120 can also include a transceiver (not shown) that communicates with transceiver 204 via their respective antennas using known protocols.
The lock box 110 is generally made of metal or other conductive material, which can interfere with eddy currents in the loop antenna 202 and de-tune the antenna. As a result, it can be beneficial to decouple the antenna from the metal through appropriate insulation or other electrical isolation techniques.
In view of the many possible embodiments to which the disclosed principles may be applied, it should be recognized that the illustrated embodiments are only preferred examples and should not be taken as limiting in scope.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/923,395, filed Apr. 12, 2007, which is hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4064558 | Hughes et al. | Dec 1977 | A |
4310720 | Check, Jr. | Jan 1982 | A |
4369434 | Mueller | Jan 1983 | A |
4616111 | Vasquez | Oct 1986 | A |
4681504 | Welch, Sr. | Jul 1987 | A |
4697171 | Suh | Sep 1987 | A |
4727368 | Larson et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4760393 | Mauch | Jul 1988 | A |
4766746 | Henderson et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4791669 | Kage | Dec 1988 | A |
4808993 | Clark | Feb 1989 | A |
4831851 | Larson | May 1989 | A |
4851652 | Imran | Jul 1989 | A |
4887292 | Barrett et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4887296 | Horne | Dec 1989 | A |
4896246 | Henderson et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4897875 | Pollard et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4914732 | Henderson et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4916443 | Barrett et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4926665 | Stapley et al. | May 1990 | A |
4929880 | Henderson et al. | May 1990 | A |
4947163 | Henderson et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4988987 | Barrett et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
4993069 | Matyas et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5007089 | Matyas et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5046084 | Barrett et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5107258 | Soum | Apr 1992 | A |
5131038 | Puhl et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5140317 | Hyatt, Jr. et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5202922 | Iijima | Apr 1993 | A |
5245652 | Larson et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5253294 | Maurer | Oct 1993 | A |
5267460 | Burleigh | Dec 1993 | A |
5280518 | Danler et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5313521 | Torii et al. | May 1994 | A |
5319710 | Atalla et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5321242 | Heath, Jr. | Jun 1994 | A |
5322992 | Castleman et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5340968 | Watanabe et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5373282 | Carter | Dec 1994 | A |
5381478 | Iijima | Jan 1995 | A |
5397884 | Saliga | Mar 1995 | A |
5410301 | Dawson et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5437057 | Richley et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5451757 | Heath, Jr. | Sep 1995 | A |
5475375 | Barrett et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5506575 | Ormos | Apr 1996 | A |
5539824 | Bjorklund et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5541581 | Trent | Jul 1996 | A |
5563579 | Carter | Oct 1996 | A |
5598476 | LaBarre et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5602536 | Henderson et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5602918 | Chen et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5612668 | Scott | Mar 1997 | A |
5612683 | Trempala et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5654696 | Barrett et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5705991 | Kniffin et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5706347 | Burke et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5708716 | Tisdale et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5710557 | Schuette | Jan 1998 | A |
5719938 | Haas et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5729609 | Moulart et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5745044 | Hyatt, Jr. et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5751813 | Dorenbos | May 1998 | A |
5758522 | York | Jun 1998 | A |
5768921 | Hill | Jun 1998 | A |
5774058 | Henry et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5778256 | Darbee | Jul 1998 | A |
5791172 | Deighton et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5801618 | Jenkins | Sep 1998 | A |
5801628 | Maloney | Sep 1998 | A |
5815557 | Larson | Sep 1998 | A |
5878613 | Tabacchi et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5881584 | Brunoski et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5905798 | Nerlikar et al. | May 1999 | A |
5909491 | Luo | Jun 1999 | A |
5937065 | Simon et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5942985 | Chin | Aug 1999 | A |
5953425 | Selker | Sep 1999 | A |
5960086 | Atalla | Sep 1999 | A |
5987139 | Bodin | Nov 1999 | A |
5999095 | Earl et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6005487 | Hyatt, Jr. et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6041408 | Nishioka et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6044155 | Thomlinson et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6046558 | Larson et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6047575 | Larson et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6065880 | Thompson | May 2000 | A |
6072402 | Kniffin et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6075441 | Maloney | Jun 2000 | A |
6075864 | Batten | Jun 2000 | A |
6088450 | Davis et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6094487 | Butler et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6097306 | Leon et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6130621 | Weiss | Oct 2000 | A |
6151676 | Cuccia et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6157720 | Yoshiura et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6167137 | Marino et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6182220 | Chen et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6195005 | Maloney | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6204764 | Maloney | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6209367 | Hyatt, Jr. et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6230269 | Spies et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6232876 | Maloney | May 2001 | B1 |
6243811 | Patel | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6262664 | Maloney | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6263435 | Dondeti et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6269445 | Nishioka et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6275936 | Kyojima et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6317044 | Maloney | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6330816 | O'Connor | Dec 2001 | B1 |
D456852 | Maloney | May 2002 | S |
6392543 | Maloney | May 2002 | B2 |
6407665 | Maloney | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6411212 | Hecht et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6424260 | Maloney | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6427913 | Maloney | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6472973 | Harold et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6501379 | Maloney | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6538560 | Stobbe et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6693538 | Maloney | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6707380 | Maloney | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6727801 | Gervasi et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6727817 | Maloney | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6803882 | Hoetzel | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6813777 | Weinberger et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6822553 | Henderson et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6839838 | Fukuda | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6867695 | Prado et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6937140 | Outslay et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
7061367 | Mosgrove et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7086258 | Fisher et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7123127 | Mosgrove et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7128274 | Kelley et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7239238 | Tester et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7340400 | McGinn et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7386876 | Kim | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7606558 | Despain et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
8164419 | Fisher | Apr 2012 | B2 |
20010022552 | Maloney | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010025340 | Marchant | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20020075154 | Maloney | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020145520 | Maloney | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020153418 | Maloney | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030030543 | Castle et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030231103 | Fisher | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040025039 | Kuenzi et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040212493 | Stilp | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20070018787 | Martinez de Velasco Cortina et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070018789 | Yuhara | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070024417 | Gerstenkorn | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070090921 | Fisher | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070159297 | Paulk et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20080252461 | Sugata et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20100011418 | Despain et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20110053557 | Despain et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1338941 | Feb 1997 | CA |
1296112 | May 2001 | CN |
4444913 | Jun 1995 | DE |
19644052 | May 1998 | DE |
29904431 | May 1999 | DE |
0086617 | Aug 1983 | EP |
0086617 | Aug 1983 | EP |
0410024 | Jan 1991 | EP |
0410024 | Jan 1991 | EP |
0427188 | May 1991 | EP |
0427188 | May 1991 | EP |
0427188 | May 1991 | EP |
0668421 | Aug 1995 | EP |
0719899 | Jul 1996 | EP |
0911475 | Apr 1999 | EP |
0911475 | Apr 1999 | EP |
0935041 | Aug 1999 | EP |
1088958 | Apr 2001 | EP |
1088958 | Apr 2001 | EP |
2566823 | Jan 1986 | FR |
2593310 | Jul 1987 | FR |
2705116 | Nov 1994 | FR |
2760874 | Sep 1998 | FR |
2080383 | Feb 1982 | GB |
2280709 | Feb 1995 | GB |
2305214 | Apr 1997 | GB |
2315804 | Feb 1998 | GB |
7-229336 | Aug 1995 | JP |
10-54166 | Feb 1998 | JP |
11-71943 | Mar 1999 | JP |
2001-182388 | Jul 2001 | JP |
2002-256748 | Sep 2002 | JP |
8501907 | Aug 1987 | NL |
191268 | Nov 1994 | NL |
2186919 | Aug 2002 | RU |
WO8705069 | Aug 1987 | WO |
WO 9010134 | Sep 1990 | WO |
WO 9417268 | Aug 1994 | WO |
WO 9939066 | Aug 1999 | WO |
WO 0120413 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO 0125570 | Apr 2001 | WO |
WO 0186098 | Nov 2001 | WO |
WO 0245031 | Jun 2002 | WO |
WO 03093997 | Nov 2003 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Ardiri, Aaron, “Palm OS® Platform Software Protection,” retrieved from http://oasis.palm.com/dev/kb/papers/2169.cfm (18 pages) (printed May 16, 2002). |
DisplayKEY, www.supra-products.com/verticals/realestate/products/displaykey.asp, (1 page) (printed Jan. 25, 2003). |
iButton Products: iButtons, www.ibutton.com/products/ibuttons.html, (3 pages) (printed Nov. 13, 2003). |
ISO/IEC 18092, “Information technology—Telecommunications and information exchange between systems—Near Field Communication—Interface and Protocol (NFCIP),” (66 pages) (Apr. 1, 2004). |
KeyTrak, www.keytrak.com/markets/auto—features.asp, (18 pages) (printed Jan. 15, 2003). |
NFC Forum News Conference, Powerpoint presentation (36 pages) (Jun. 5, 2006). |
Rinnai Operation/Installation Manual, (48 pages) (Printed in Japan, Jun. 2003). |
The extended European Search Report in counterpart European Application No. 08154226 filed Apr. 9, 2008. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080252415 A1 | Oct 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60923395 | Apr 2007 | US |