The present disclosure generally relates to displays for use in retail environments, and more particularly, relates to a sampling display for demonstrating fragrance products.
Displays for promoting and demonstrating fragrance products within a retail environment are well known in the art. Such displays serve to catch the attention of consumers and persuade consumers to purchase the product being advertised. To accomplish this, fragrance product displays generally aim to provide pleasing aesthetics and proper samples of the fragrance products. Although appearance is important, consumers prefer to know exactly what the fragrance smells like before purchasing a product for personal or home use. For the most part, descriptions on the packaging or labeling are not sufficient or accurate in describing a scent of the product. Accordingly, displays for promoting a fragrance share the common goal of providing an accurate sample of the fragrance being advertised.
Some of the currently existing solutions range from something as simple as scratch and sniff pads on product packaging to more complex devices which selectively atomize one of a plurality of scents according to user input. Scratch and sniff pads generally wear off too easily and fail to accurately reproduce the actual scent of the product. More complicated devices and atomizers typically take up too much space and are not cost effective. Therefore, displays promoting fragrance products within a retail environment usually resort to providing a plurality of sample bottles or testers to allow consumers to examine each available scent at the point of sale.
Testers are essentially sample bottles or containers of the actual fragrance that consumers can spray into the air or onto a sampling card to examine the fragrance firsthand. However, multiple testers from different manufacturers are usually grouped together in a single area designated for sampling, such as on countertops, shelves, or the like. This takes up a considerable amount of space and adds clutter. Such an arrangement also makes it difficult to distinguish and advertise one particular fragrance product over a competing brand or product line. Additionally, testers are typically provided only for perfumes and colognes, but not for fragrance dispensers designed for the home. Consequently, when selecting a fragrance for home use, consumers are forced to guess by reading the description on package labels, smelling the packaging, or by opening the package in the store.
Furthermore, as fragrance samples and testers are exposed and easily accessible, they are more likely to be misplaced, stolen, damaged, or the like. This can cause confusion or frustration to consumers and the staff of a retail establishment. In addition to being easily accessible, testers tend to lack substantial means of controlling or limiting the amount of the sample to be dispensed per use. For instance, sprays or active fragrance dispensers may be used in excess amounts than is necessary, while opened passive fragrance dispensers may be left unsealed and prone to evaporation. Therefore, providing samples of a fragrance product via testers often results in significant volumes of the product being wasted on refilling or replacing depleted samples.
Therefore, multiple needs exist for an aesthetically pleasing display which provides a proper demonstration of a brand or product line of fragrances. More specifically, needs exist for a display that reduces clutter and sets the products apart from the competition. The need also exists for a fragrance display which provides means of minimizing the amount of the product that is wasted on sampling. An ideal display should also be cost-conscious and provide a display that may be easily installed and readily adaptable to new products or changing retail environments. The display should also require minimal space and be mountable on existing shelving units.
In accordance with one aspect of the disclosure, a fragrance sampling display apparatus is provided. The fragrance sampling display comprises a dock attachable to a shelving unit; one or more receptacles disposed on a surface of the dock; and one or more scent modules, each scent module comprising a volatile active of a different fragrance, each scent module being associated with and retractably coupled to one of the receptacles, and each scent module being biased into a retracted state.
In accordance with another aspect of the disclosure, a fragrance sampling display apparatus is provided. The fragrance sampling display apparatus comprises a dock attachable to a shelving unit; one or more receptacles disposed on a surface of the dock; and one or more scent modules, each scent module comprising a volatile active of a different fragrance, each scent module being associated with and retractably coupled to one of the receptacles, and each scent module being substantially prohibited from emitting the associated fragrance when in a retracted state.
In accordance with another aspect of the disclosure, a fragrance sampling display apparatus is provided. The fragrance sampling display apparatus comprises a dock attachable to a shelving unit and having a faceplate; one or more receptacles disposed on the faceplate; and one or more scent modules, each scent module comprising a volatile active of a different fragrance, each scent module being associated with and retractably coupled to one of the receptacles with a retractable cord, each scent module being configured to passively emit a fragrance from a surface thereof when removed from the associated receptacle and being substantially prohibited from emitting the associated fragrance when in a retracted state.
These and other aspects of this disclosure will become more readily apparent upon reading the following detailed description when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
While the present disclosure is susceptible to various modifications and alternative constructions, certain illustrative embodiments thereof have been shown in the drawings and will be described below in detail. It should be understood, however, that there is no intention to limit the present invention to the specific forms disclosed, but on the contrary, the intention is to cover all modifications, alternative constructions, and equivalents falling with the spirit and scope of the present invention.
Referring now to the drawings and with particular reference to
As shown in
Turning to
Referring to
To ensure that each scent module 18c is retained within its respective receptacle 14c, each scent module 18c may be retractably coupled to its corresponding receptacle 14c, as shown in the cross-sectional view of
Still referring to the embodiment of
Turning now to
Referring to
Referring now to
Turning to
Referring now to
Based on the foregoing, it can be seen that the present disclosure provides an aesthetically pleasing display which properly promotes and demonstrates a brand or product line of fragrances. More specifically, the present disclosure provides a compact display that reduces clutter and sets the sampled products apart from the competition. The fragrance display requires minimal space and is mountable on existing shelving units. The fragrance display is also cost-conscious in that it provides means of minimizing the amount of the product that is wasted on sampling. Furthermore, the fragrance display is also readily adaptable to new products or changing retail environments.
While only certain embodiments have been set forth, alternatives and modifications will be apparent from the above description to those skilled in the art. These and other alternatives are considered equivalents and within the spirit and scope of this disclosure.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3661838 | Enomoto | May 1972 | A |
3966902 | Chromecek | Jun 1976 | A |
D243647 | Schoenfeld | Mar 1977 | S |
4110261 | Newland | Aug 1978 | A |
D269310 | Wells | Jun 1983 | S |
4405509 | Rogers et al. | Sep 1983 | A |
4486169 | Lewis | Dec 1984 | A |
4598006 | Sand | Jul 1986 | A |
4762493 | Anderson | Aug 1988 | A |
D307088 | Frieden, Jr. | Apr 1990 | S |
D331337 | Krinke et al. | Dec 1992 | S |
5282571 | Smith et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
D348122 | Susini et al. | Jun 1994 | S |
D351076 | Eliadis et al. | Oct 1994 | S |
D370801 | Oliver et al. | Jun 1996 | S |
D385581 | Linz | Oct 1997 | S |
5707696 | Boxler | Jan 1998 | A |
5713462 | Hansen | Feb 1998 | A |
5955034 | Zaunbrecher et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
D418330 | Schumacher | Jan 2000 | S |
6103201 | Green | Aug 2000 | A |
D430432 | Mason | Sep 2000 | S |
6206189 | Huot, Jr. et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6471731 | Elliott, III et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6503285 | Murphy | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6607275 | Cimini et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6645479 | Shefer et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6716276 | Loop et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
D493309 | Moss et al. | Jul 2004 | S |
6803033 | McGee et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6827448 | Cimini et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6899486 | Wetzel et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6913733 | Hardy et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
D515681 | Muir et al. | Feb 2006 | S |
7051681 | Pope | May 2006 | B2 |
7105064 | Popplewell et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7111794 | Timpson | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7122512 | Brain et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7125835 | Bennett et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
D532506 | Caserta et al. | Nov 2006 | S |
D544086 | Wu | Jun 2007 | S |
D551748 | Butler et al. | Sep 2007 | S |
D553730 | Wu | Oct 2007 | S |
D554247 | Wu | Oct 2007 | S |
7291187 | Welch et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7294612 | Popplewell et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
D557785 | Wu | Dec 2007 | S |
D557937 | Hafif | Dec 2007 | S |
D559589 | Stellon-Solimine et al. | Jan 2008 | S |
D577803 | Fabrega et al. | Sep 2008 | S |
D577804 | Fabrega et al. | Sep 2008 | S |
D578199 | Fabrega et al. | Oct 2008 | S |
D578804 | Norman et al. | Oct 2008 | S |
7431901 | Stiros et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7566185 | Samuelson et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7658307 | Skupin | Feb 2010 | B2 |
20030000177 | Landau | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030199421 | Copfer | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040068920 | Steele et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20050227906 | Schudel et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050265904 | Hardy et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060104933 | Bell et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060169796 | Timpson et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060254125 | Tully et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060283957 | Blumenfeld et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070022644 | Lynch et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070032400 | Bell et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070056878 | Walsh et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070065332 | Stiros et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070187516 | Bell et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080056959 | Cuthbert | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080173665 | Oshinski et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20090019741 | Schwartz et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090294390 | Weshler | Dec 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 836 170 | May 2001 | EP |
1779885 | May 2007 | EP |
2768906 | Apr 1999 | FR |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110006072 A1 | Jan 2011 | US |