The field of this invention is downhole tools that have control lines or other types of lines that run past them and ways of retaining and protecting said line or lines as they pass the downhole tool.
A frequent occurrence in downhole operations is the need to run control lines along a string and past downhole equipment to reach yet other equipment. The lines can conduct hydraulic fluid under pressure, or electric power, or electric signals in either direction. Frequently, a running string or production string is run through tight clearances and that causes a concern about damage to the control line or lines that are frequently run along side.
One solution that has been tried in the past is illustrated in
Those skilled in the art will appreciate that a big problem in this design was that it added to the diameter of the tool that was being run in. In some cases that would make it impossible to deliver the tool because the drift diameters downhole were simply not large enough. In other cases of close clearances the clamp 18 would get hung up and get sheared off and the control line or lines would come out from between rods 12 and 14 and would get damaged.
Another proposal to improve the previously described attempt was to take away some on the wall thickness such as at the thick portion of a side pocket mandrel and simply guide the control line through the longitudinal groove. While this idea did not add to the outer dimension of the assembly, it had another shortcoming. There were no provisions for retaining the control line in the groove except external bands that simply defeated the purpose of the recessed groove by adding back bulk that would either prevent advancement of the assembly altogether or it would present components sticking out that could get snagged and stick the tool or get sheared off.
What is needed and provided by the present invention is a way of retaining the control line or lines in a recess without components that stick out by allowing the placement of retainers at desired locations. These and other advantages of the present invention will be more readily apparent to those skilled in the art from a review of the description of the preferred embodiment and the claims that appear below.
One or more control lines or other types of lines can be run past a downhole tool such as a side pocket mandrel, for example, in a longitudinal groove with a retaining feature for the control line where the assembly leaves little to stick out and get damaged on run in or on pulling out of the hole. In the preferred version, the groove is a dovetail and at least one retainer can be slipped into the dovetail. Lateral bores into the dovetail allow pins to be driven into a wedge shaped retainer to force it against the control line or lines such that the shape of the dovetail and the shape of the wedge retainer trap the control line within the dovetail. Upon assembly, nothing sticks out from the dovetail or the downhole tool.
Wedge points can occur at desired locations along the groove 32. The wedge 44 can take a variety of forms within the scope of the invention. The groove shape can be varied as can the shape of the wedge 44, which can conform or not to the shape of the control line 33. The cross-sectional shape of the groove 32 can vary or be constant. Consistently, despite variations in the details, the control line 33 should be secured within groove 32 without exposing the control line 33 so that it could be damaged and without retaining devices that keep the control line 33 in place from extending beyond the groove 32 in a manner that could get such devices snagged going into or out of the wellbore or in a way that limits the ability of the downhole tool to pass a predetermined drift diameter. While one wedge is shown, opposing wedges can be used to hold the control line anywhere in the groove 32. The wedges can be mirror images or they can be different. Walls 34 and 36 can be flat or curved or sloping toward each other, or parallel or sloping away from each other.
The above description is illustrative of the preferred embodiment and many modifications may be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the invention whose scope is to be determined from the literal and equivalent scope of the claims below.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5394823 | Lenze | Mar 1995 | A |
5803170 | Garcia-Soule et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5892860 | Maron et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
6554064 | Restarick et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6681854 | Danos | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6805202 | Gillespie et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6817410 | Wetzel et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6877553 | Cameron | Apr 2005 | B2 |
20020134549 | Marangoni et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030000875 | Echols et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030168221 | Zachman | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040168794 | Vold | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040262013 | Tilton et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2354782 | Apr 2001 | GB |
2382831 | Nov 2003 | GB |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070039727 A1 | Feb 2007 | US |