1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates generally to blocks used for the construction of retaining walls. More specifically, the invention relates to a cementitious block that is easier to place into a secure block retaining wall than existing blocks while also being able to be offer alternative methods for increasing the retaining strength of the wall made from the blocks.
2. Description of Related Art
Retaining walls made from dry stacked concrete blocks have become widely accepted for both landscaping and construction projects. These concrete blocks are mass produced, which makes them relatively inexpensive, and are available in several colors and textures. These blocks offer the durability of concrete with the attractiveness of various architectural features. Due to their significant weight, when the blocks are assembled to form a wall, they have the ability to retain soil and earth while aesthetically defining walkways, property lines, and other landscaping features. It is possible to build a wall from such blocks quickly and without the need for special skilled labor, and how quickly the wall is constructed depends on the size of the blocks used and ease of stacking the blocks for the workers.
To increase the structural integrity of the wall made from these blocks, various methods have been introduced to provide features on the blocks to interlock them together. Furthermore, walls formed from blocks that have been interlocked look more professional as the blocks are uniformly and consistently arranged. One example of an interlocking feature is a lip or protrusion extending along the lower rear edge of each block. As each successive course is laid over an underlying course, the lips of the blocks in the new course are fitted over the rear upper edge of the underlying course of blocks, which interlocks the blocks and also sets the new course back from the lower course it is resting on a predetermined distance. Another interlocking method is the use of pins extending vertically between courses of blocks to resist lateral shifting or movement between adjacent blocks and courses. Similar to the lip discussed above, pins also provide a registry function, by assuring that the front faces of the blocks are vertically aligned or setback a predetermined distance.
As the use of these concrete retaining wall blocks becomes prevalent in commercial and large-scale projects, additional soil-reinforcing materials and methods are needed to ensure that the retaining wall can prevent lateral displacement of the soil and toppling of the wall. One material that is used is a geogrid, which are commonly used to reinforce retaining walls by preventing the soils from moving by transferring the forces to a larger area of soil other than just the soil in contact with the wall. Alternatively, soil anchors or metal ribbed or wave-shaped strips can be attached to the wall and then buried in the backfilled area to provide additional strength to the retaining wall. Additionally, several of these larger commercial projects have specifications requiring engineered backfill rather than just retaining the native soil to ensure the wall maintains its integrity.
It is therefore desirable to have relatively lightweight block that allows easier and quicker installation while allowing the use of various soil-reinforcing methods and materials with increased room for more engineered backfill in contact with the individual blocks of the wall.
The present invention provides for a retaining wall block that includes a number of features making it easier to place the block into a secure block retaining wall than existing blocks while also being able to be offer alternative methods for increasing the retaining strength of the wall made from the blocks. The invention provides for a wall block generally comprising a block body having a front face with a plurality of support legs extending rearward therefrom, opposed first and second side surfaces, and opposed and substantially parallel upper and lower surfaces. The rearward extending legs of the block increase the depth of the lower surface, which provides a more stable base for the block, while also providing a reduced weight compared to a rectangle block having the same depth. Significantly lowering the weight of the concrete blocks by removing large portions of the blocks behind the front face make for much easier handling by the installer. It also saves cementitious material without compromising the strength and structural integrity of the block.
Additionally, the use of the legs to provide a stable base rather than a fully rectangular block allows more space for engineered backfill to be added to the area between the legs and behind the wall to increase drainage and stability of the retained area. In the preferred embodiment, the contour of the legs provide additional soil retaining capabilities and serve as hand holds to ease in installation. Specifically, the legs taper as they extend away from the block but terminate in a larger than the narrowed taper diameter cylinder shape. This larger termination-point shape of the legs allows the engineered backfill or soil to be compacted between the legs while also providing an anchor to help to increase the retaining strength of the blocks.
Preferably, the blocks of the present invention have three rearward extending support legs. The two side legs are not adjacent to either of the side edges of the block and are spaced an equidistance apart from the center leg. The center leg does not extend rearward from the middle of the block, but is rather offset from the middle to allow for increased manufacturing efficiency. Because the side legs are spaced equidistance apart from the center leg, which is offset, the side legs are also offset the same amount (i.e., the distance from one side leg to the side of the block nearest it is greater than the distance from the other side leg to the side of the block nearest it. The distance between the center points of the two side legs is the same as the total distance from the center point of both side legs and the respective edge of the block nearest each. This preferred leg spacing of the side legs allows the side legs of each successive course of blocks to rest on the side legs of the prior-laid rows, while allowing the center legs to float freely (i.e., not resting on the course below) as will be discussed fully below. The free-floating center leg allows for attachment of additional stabilization means to the bottom of the center leg without preventing the blocks from resting directly on the course below. The third center leg also balances the weight of the block such that the block is not front heavy, and the use of the two side legs makes the block better balanced from side-to-side than other prior art blocks. Because the weight of the block is better balanced, the block is easier to move and install and less likely to be dropped or broken during installation.
The blocks also employ a retaining pin system adapted to align and secure the blocks together. At least one retaining pin extends vertically from a bore on the upper surface of each block. Instead of relying upon a singular bore or a relatively small cavity into which the pin is to be located, longitudinal channels are provided in the bottom face of the blocks. This enables an upper block to be slid into a proper position over a lower block, where the pin in the lower block merely enters the channel in the upper block, rather than having to be located with a discrete bore or cavity. Additionally, two or more retaining pins may also be employed, for additional interlocking strength, with each pin easily being accommodated within a channel of the overlying blocks. In one embodiment, the bores and channels in the blocks are axially coincident with the center line of the block, and located an identical distance from the rear face of each block. This arrangement effects a co-planar alignment for the front faces of the blocks (i.e., the blocks form a vertical wall when interlocked). Alternatively, the upper pin bore holes may be located closer to the rear face of each block than the longitudinal channel, effecting a setback for the front face of each successively higher course of blocks.
An alternative, novel retaining pin system is provided for as well. In this embodiment, the retaining pin has a head portion and then shoulders down to a smaller diameter body section. The pin is placed in a bore that extends through the entire height of the block and shoulder of the pin rests on the shoulder of the bore to prevent the pin from falling through the bore. The head of the pin is sized so as to not protrude through the top of the block when resting on the shoulder of the bore. The body of the pin is long enough so that when resting in the block, the pin extends vertically downward from the bottom surface of the block. The downward extending portion of the pin rests behind and adjacent to the rear surface of the block in the course below, which prevents the upper block from moving forward with respect to the lower block and creates a setback for the front face of the upper block. Instead of relying upon a singular bore or a channels in the bottom face of the upper blocks that have to be aligned, this retaining pin system allows the blocks to be slid into a greater ranges of position, limited only by the distance between the rearward extending legs of the lower block. This system also allows easier installation as the upper block can be set upon the lower block and the retaining pins can be placed in the bores. Because the bottom of the upper block is resting on the top of the lower block, the pins will not be able to seat completely and extend from the bottom until the upper block is slid back into place. Once the bottom of the bore hole passes behind the top of the lower block, the pins will fall the remaining distance into place and lock the block in place.
A parapet wall block is also provided for that can be used in conjunction with the retaining wall block of the present invention to create a parapet wall. The parapet wall block generally comprises a block body having a front face, a rear face with a plurality of recesses shaped and spaced to accept the rearwardly extending support legs of the retaining wall block, opposed first and second side surfaces, and opposed and substantially parallel upper and lower surfaces. The parapet wall block has less depth than the retaining wall block, and when used in conjunction with the retaining wall blocks allows the construction of a narrower freestanding wall or fence. The preferred embodiment of the parapet wall block has a pin-receiving channel located on the upper surface to receive and engage the retaining pins used to anchor the retaining wall blocks. To construct a parapet wall, a retaining wall block is placed on a level surface, and then a parapet wall block is placed with its rearward side engaging the legs extending the rearward side of the retaining wall block. For the next course above, the parapet wall block is placed on the retaining wall block of the first course, and the retaining wall block of the second course is placed on the parapet wall block of the first course. This altering layout is used to create additional stability when coupled with the retaining pin system.
For the purposes of this application “upper” and “lower” refer to the placement of the block in a retaining wall, wherein the lower surface faces down towards the ground. To create a retaining wall, a row of blocks is placed in a first course. Subsequently, a second course is laid on top of this by positioning the lower surface of one block on the upper surface of the blocks in the first course. This process continues until the desired height of the retaining wall is achieved. The blocks of this invention are preferably made from concrete, but other suitable materials may be used. The front face of the blocks may be smooth or may have a roughened appearance to appear more like natural stone as the blocks are formed in a mold and various textures can be formed on the surface, which is known in the art.
The novel features and construction of the present invention, as well as additional objects thereof, will be understood more fully from the following description when read in connection with the accompanying drawings.
The improved process of the invention is further described and explained in relation to the following figures of the drawings wherein:
Like reference numerals are used to describe like parts in all figures of the drawings.
Referring to
Rearward extending legs 20, 22 of retaining wall block 10 provide a stable base for block 10 by increasing the overall footprint depth of block 10. The use of rearward extending legs 20, 22 rather than a solid rectangular block provides a significant savings in the weight of the block and the materials necessary to form the block while still providing a significant footprint depth to increase the stability of block 10. Significantly lowering the weight of block 10 by the use of legs 20, 22 and foregoing a solid block makes block 10 much easier to handle and install. It also saves cementitious material without compromising the strength and structural integrity of block 10. Furthermore, the use of rearward extending legs 20, 22 to provide a stable base allows more space for engineered backfill to be added to the area between legs 20, 22 and behind the wall to increase drainage and stability of the retained area. Preferably, rearward extending legs 20, 22 are contoured and taper as they extend rearward from block 10 before terminating in a cylindrical shape. As shown in
In the preferred embodiment, block 10 of the present invention has three rearward extending support legs: center leg 20 and two side legs 22. Center leg 20 extends rearward from block 10, but not directly from the middle of block 10 as it is offset to allow for increased manufacturing efficiency, as will be discussed below and shown in
Referring to
Leveling pads 24, 26 and 27 help prevent the rocking of block 10 when placed in a retaining wall on top of other courses of blocks due to any manufacturing imperfections, such as a block that is bowed or twisted. Blocks without leveling pads that are bowed or banana-shaped from side surface to side surface have a tendency to break vertically through the face of the block when placed in a wall due to the vertical forces all being concentrated in the one point at the apex of the curve. The use of leveling pads 24, 26 and 27 accounts for and corrects any slight bowing that would be present due to their extension from the surface and spreads the weight of block 10 out over leveling pads 24, 26 and 27 rather than it being concentrated in the one bowed point. Similarly, blocks that have a slight twist (i.e., where two of the four corners of the block would be floating when placed on a flat surface) tend to break diagonally through the face due to a torsion load as the weight of the blocks above put undue pressure on the floating corners. The use of leveling pads 24, 26 and 27 accounts for and corrects and slight twisting that would be present due to their extension form the surface and by spreading the weight of the block 10 out over leveling pads 24, 26 and 27. Additionally, blocks with leveling pads are capable of holding geogrid materials in place better than blocks without leveling pads due to the entire weight of the block being located in the three load-bearing points rather than dispersed across the entire bottom surface area.
Referring to
Referring back to
In this embodiment, there are two pin apertures 30 and two pin-receiving channels 28 per block, and pin apertures 30 are located further away from face 12 of block 10 than pin-receiving channels 28, which effects a setback for the front face of each successively higher course of blocks equivalent to the offset distance between pin-receiving channels 28 and pin apertures 30. In an alternate embodiment of this pinning system, pin-receiving channels 28 and pin apertures 30 are not offset and are axially coincident with the center line of block 10, which creates co-planar alignment for the front faces of the blocks (i.e., the blocks form a vertical wall) when interlocked.
Referring to
Referring to
In general, when a second course of blocks is added on top of a first course, edge 14 of block 10 in the second course is aligned and placed in horizontal center of block 10 in the first course. This placement causes left side leg 22 of the upper block to align directly over right said leg 22 of the lower block. Specifically referring to
Center leg 122 of upper block 120 is free-floating and not in contact with lower blocks 100 and 110 or any portion of the first course of blocks. As the wall is built, the center legs of the blocks never come into contact with the row below. This is by design, as having a free-floating center leg allows for attachment of additional stabilization means to the bottom of the center leg without preventing the blocks from resting directly on the course below. For example, soil anchors or metal ribbed or wave-shaped strips can be attached to the underside of the center legs that are not in contact with the other blocks and then buried in the backfilled area to provide additional strength to the retaining wall. Additionally, due to the cylindrical-shaped termination points of rearward extending legs 20, 22, other wall and soil stabilization means can be attached that have an open socket shape that would slide down and fit around the cylindrical-shaped termination points. For example, concrete trunk blocks could be sized to run from the center leg of a block on one wall to a center leg of a block on an adjacent perpendicular wall (i.e., to stabilize a wall with a right angle corner). Alternatively, a “dead man” with an open socket shape could be slid over a cylindrical termination point of a leg and then buried in the backfilled area to provide additional strength.
Referring to
Referring specifically to
Referring specifically to
Referring to
As can be seen in
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Other alterations and modifications of the invention will likewise become apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art upon reading the present disclosure, and it is intended that the scope of the invention disclosed herein be limited only by the broadest interpretation of the appended claims to which the inventors are legally entitled.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3269125 | Moore | Aug 1966 | A |
4524551 | Scheiwiller | Jun 1985 | A |
4592678 | McNinch, Jr. | Jun 1986 | A |
4957395 | Nelson | Sep 1990 | A |
4990032 | Smith | Feb 1991 | A |
5044834 | Janopaul, Jr. | Sep 1991 | A |
5161918 | Hodel | Nov 1992 | A |
5163261 | O'Neill | Nov 1992 | A |
5178492 | Meheen | Jan 1993 | A |
RE34314 | Forsberg | Jul 1993 | E |
5257880 | Janopaul, Jr. | Nov 1993 | A |
5315802 | Hart | May 1994 | A |
5490363 | Woolford | Feb 1996 | A |
5540525 | Miller | Jul 1996 | A |
5567089 | Akamine | Oct 1996 | A |
5601384 | Dawson | Feb 1997 | A |
D387434 | Dawson | Dec 1997 | S |
5704183 | Woolford | Jan 1998 | A |
5741339 | DuMars | Apr 1998 | A |
5913790 | Dawson | Jun 1999 | A |
5951210 | Maguire | Sep 1999 | A |
5975809 | Taylor | Nov 1999 | A |
6082933 | Maguire | Jul 2000 | A |
6371700 | Rich | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6615561 | MacDonald | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6622445 | Shillingburg | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6701687 | Shillingburg | Mar 2004 | B1 |
7396190 | Price | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7621095 | Dean, Jr. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7645098 | Rainey | Jan 2010 | B1 |
7780141 | Dawson | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7818919 | Maxwell-Merrill | Oct 2010 | B1 |
8132988 | Dawson | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8297887 | Ness | Oct 2012 | B2 |
20010016150 | Greenberg | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010019684 | Manthei | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20020023403 | Whitson | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020083657 | Mattox | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020172563 | Rainey | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030012608 | Race | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030017011 | DeVoe | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030029127 | Tierney | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030188497 | Price | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030213203 | Bott | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040074192 | Mason | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040159065 | Burgess | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040161307 | Hammer | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040237445 | Kliethermes | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040265070 | Nanayakkara | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050016106 | Dawson | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050100418 | Lee | May 2005 | A1 |
20050252122 | Geiger | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050254906 | Dolan | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050279046 | Gravier | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060051166 | Lee | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060101770 | Price | May 2006 | A1 |
20070277471 | Gibson | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080047218 | Abella | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080134603 | Henderson | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080229698 | Ulguner | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080289283 | Shin | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080313988 | MacDonald | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090208298 | Ness | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100251649 | Woolbright | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100284751 | Price | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100290842 | Cho | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100303555 | Herse | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110072753 | MacDonald | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20120057939 | Bone | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120063853 | Bott | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120151862 | Daoust | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20130049259 | Hammer | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130074436 | Bott | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20150063924 | Brookhart | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150308698 | Weber | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20170218622 | Manthei | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170254041 | Yu | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170260743 | Simonson | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20180023303 | MacDonald | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180051436 | Smith | Feb 2018 | A1 |