I. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a fin retention system for a projectile having deployable fins to hold the fins in their undeployed position until after launch.
II. Description of Related Art
Many projectiles, such as mortars, missiles, and the like, have deployable fins, i.e. fins that are movable between an undeployed position and a deployed position. In their undeployed position, the fins are folded or pivoted towards the projectile thus reducing the overall diameter of the projectile around its fins. Conversely, upon deployment, the fins pivot or fold outwardly to their deployed position thus increasing the overall circumference of the projectile around the fins (i.e., super-caliber fins).
In practice, the fins are maintained in their undeployed position all the way through the launch of the projectile from a launch tube. It is only after the projectile exits from the launch tube that the projectile fins move to their deployed position. Any conventional means, such as springs, or simply the inertia of the fins may be used to move the fins to their deployed position immediately after exiting from the launch tube.
There have been previously known methods and devices to hold the fins in their undeployed position until immediately after launch. For example, there have been previously known active electric or mechanical actuators which move the fins from their undeployed and to their deployed position immediately after launch. These systems, however, are relatively expensive and heavy in construction. Furthermore, since these systems are active systems, the failure of the fin deployment system can occur, possibly with catastrophic results.
Still other systems, such as Kevlar strings and passive bore guides similar to a sabot, have also been previously known to hold the fins in their undeployed position until immediately after launch. These previously known systems have all suffered various disadvantages such as high cost and insufficient reliability.
The present invention provides an externally mounted fin retention system for a projectile having deployable fins which overcomes the above mentioned disadvantages of the previously known devices.
In brief, the fin retention system of the present invention comprises a plurality of identical fin retention units wherein each fin retention unit is associated with one of the deployable fins of the projectile and, whereby, each fin deploys independently of the others. Thus, a projectile having three independently-deploying fins will have three fin retention units, a projectile having four independently-deploying fins will have four fin retention units, and so forth.
Each fin retention unit includes an alignment device and a pair of generally planar span arms. The span arms protrude laterally outwardly from opposite sides of the alignment device.
An attachment device is positioned adjacent to a free end of one of the span arms for each retention unit while a cooperating attachment device is positioned adjacent to a free end of the other of the span arms. Each attachment device is dimensioned to lock with its cooperating attachment device and, preferably, the attachment device and cooperating attachment device are snap locks.
With the fins of the projectile in an undeployed position, one alignment device is aligned with each fin. Simultaneously, the attachment device of each retention unit is attached to the cooperating attachment device of the adjacent retention unit. This locks the retention units in place surrounding both the projectile and the undeployed fins. A pin on each alignment device preferably engages a receiving notch in the projectile fin so that, with the fin retention units positioned around the undeployed fins and locked together, the fin retention system is not only locked against axial movement relative to the projectile, but also holds the undeployed fins in their undeployed position.
In order to launch the projectile, the projectile with its attached fin retention unit is positioned within the launch tube. Separating the fin retention system from the projectile immediately after launch, i.e. upon exiting from the launch tube, may be achieved in different fashions. For example, the fin retention units may be constructed of a combustible material so that, during launch, the combustion products from the projectile launch also combust the fin retention system to such a degree that any remaining remnants of the fin retention units after launch will be separated from the projectile by inertial and/or aerodynamic drag forces. Alternatively, the fin retention units may be constructed of a flame-retardant material and simply separate from the projectile immediately after launch by breaking away from the projectile through inertial and/or aerodynamic drag forces.
The fin retention system of the present invention enjoys low cost and high reliability due in large part to its simplicity, lack of moving parts and suitability for being mass produced. The fin retention system of the present invention relies solely upon existing events during the launch of the projectile in order to separate the fin retention system from the projectile.
A better understanding of the present invention will be had upon reference to the following detailed description when read in conjunction with the accompanying drawing, wherein like reference characters refer to like parts throughout the several views, and in which:
With reference first to
The deployable fins 12 are movable from their undeployed position, illustrated in phantom line in
The number of fins 12 may vary for different projectiles 10. However, typically each projectile 10 includes at least three fins 12 and usually not more than four or five. Additionally, the fins 12 are usually equidistantly circumferentially spaced around the projectile 10.
With reference now to
With reference now to
A pair of span arms 24 and 26, respectively, extends outwardly from opposite sides of the alignment member 18. Each span arm 24 and 26, furthermore, is substantially planar and the span arms 24 and 26 intersect each other at an angle equal to 60, 90, and 108 degrees for a typical projectile 10 with 3, 4, or 5 fins, respectively. Each span arm 24 and 26 also includes a pair of struts 27 which reduces the weight of the retention unit 16.
An attachment device 28 is positioned adjacent a free end 30 of the span arm 24 while a cooperating attachment device 32 is positioned adjacent a free end 34 of the other span arm 26. The attachment devices 28 and 32 selectively lock together in order to secure the adjacent retention units 16 together as shown in
With reference now to
In operation the fin retention units 16 are positioned over their associated fins 12 and locked together as shown in
For most efficient use, the fin retention system should separate from the projectile immediately after exiting from the launch tube. In order to achieve the separation, two different systems may be used.
First, the fin retention units 16, which are preferably of a one piece construction, may be constructed of a flammable material which ignites during the launch of the projectile and burns through at least the struts 27 on the span arms 24 or 26 before exiting from the launch tube. Thus, upon launch, any remaining portions of the fin retention system will merely separate from the projectile due to inertial and/or aerodynamic drag forces.
Alternatively, the fin retention units 16 may be constructed of an inert and flame-retardant material. In this case, the inertial forces acting on the fin retention unit during the launch will cause the fin retention units 16 to separate from each other and/or fragment. In either case, the fin retention units 16 will separate from the projectile 10 immediately after launch as desired.
From the foregoing, it can be seen that the present invention provides a simple external fin retention unit for use with a projectile having deployable fins. Since the fin retention system of the present invention utilizes no moving parts, it enjoys high reliability in operation. Furthermore, the fin retention units which form the fin retention system may be mass produced thus reducing the overall cost of the fin retention system.
Additional details and advantages of the present invention may be provided in U.S. Army Research Laboratory Technical Report titled “Tactical Means to Stow Super-Caliber Tailfins of a Developmental Flight-Controlled Mortar” by the present inventors and is hereby incorporated by reference herein.
Having described my invention, many modifications thereto will become apparent to those skilled in the art to which it pertains without deviation from the spirit of the invention as defined by the scope of the appended claims.
The invention described herein may be manufactured, used, and licensed by or for the United States Government.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1509336 | Borden | Sep 1924 | A |
3819132 | Rusbach | Jun 1974 | A |
3845922 | Mayer | Nov 1974 | A |
4332360 | Topliffe | Jun 1982 | A |
4334657 | Mattson | Jun 1982 | A |
4431147 | Paley | Feb 1984 | A |
4444115 | Romer et al. | Apr 1984 | A |
H905 | Rottenberg | Apr 1991 | H |
H1412 | Kline et al. | Feb 1995 | H |
5474256 | Garner | Dec 1995 | A |
5503080 | Goward et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5685503 | Trouillot et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5780766 | Schroppel | Jul 1998 | A |
6272997 | James et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6314886 | Kuhnle et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6588700 | Moore et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6764042 | Moore et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
7083140 | Dooley | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7100865 | Byrne et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7308981 | Noel Du Payrat et al. | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7628353 | Peterson | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7851734 | Hash et al. | Dec 2010 | B1 |
8387508 | Niemi et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8415598 | Terhune et al. | Apr 2013 | B1 |
20030071166 | Moore et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20040108412 | Moore et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20070084961 | Johnsson et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20080000781 | Noel Du Payrat et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Army Research Laboratory Technical Report titled “Tactical Means to Stow Super-Caliber Tailfins of a Developmental Flight-Controlled Mortar” by Christian A. Valledor and John A. Condon. |
M395 Precision Guided Mortar Munition (PGMM). Defense Update. 2006. http://defenseupdate.com/products/x/xm395.htm (accessed 2011). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140008483 A1 | Jan 2014 | US |